Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMER INTERNSHIP AT
Project by: Ankur Bansal Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Roorkee
Preface
The interconnection between theoretical study and the practical implementation is the very need of engineering and this internship helps me in understanding the nuances of actual world application of the theoretical knowledge of engineering. The internship with Zeus Numerix Pvt Ltd gave me the opportunity to apply my engineering skills and it was a scintillating experience to have successfully completed the project. Knowledge of something useful can become redundant. The difference between a successful and an unsuccessful professionals lies not only in the amount of knowledge one has, much he can actually use in various situations. In this report presented here, a sincere effort has been made by me to mention the knowledge attained by me during the training. The information is given as provided by the company.
Page 2
Abstract
Nowadays the reduction of drag is becoming a very important challenge for all the car manufacturers as they are competing intensely to produce powerful pickup trucks with better gas mileage in the market regulated with law reinforcement on fuel emissions and consumers need for bigger size trucks with more horse power and cargo capacity. Lower drag provides better performances such as higher top speed and better stability. It also often lowers aerodynamic noise and greenhouse gas emission above all decreases in fuel consumption. However, modern designs of pickup trucks tend to go higher and wider and thus they have higher frontal areas due to the functional, economic and aesthetic requirements. Increasing frontal area of the vehicle tend to increase the drag force acting on the vehicle which is proportional to the dimensionless drag coefficient Cd and the projected area of the vehicle. Consequently, to hold or even decrease the drag on a truck that has a larger frontal area, tremendous effort has to be made. The purpose of this project is to carry out complete transient, three dimensional numerical simulations of the flow field around a pickup truck. A simplified truck with smooth under body and no side mirrors is considered in the study. CFD simulations were carried out using the CFD expert-lite software which is an unstructured finite-volume based Navier-Stokes solver. In the simulations k- turbulence model with high Re model was used. The results show all the flow structures around the truck. Through this research work, our understanding of the complex flow field around a pickup truck could be improved
Page 3
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Irshad khan, COO, Zeus Numerix Pvt Ltd, Pune, who is also my mentor, for their immense support and guidance throughout the project.
I would also like to thank Mr. Vijay P, Sr. CAE Engineer; Mr. Vivek Warade, CAE Engineer; Mr. Manjunath, CAE Engineer, Zeus Numerix Pvt Ltd for their help and without whom it would have been difficult for me to implement the project.
Lastly, I would like to thank all other office colleagues at for their support and cooperation which immensely helped me in the completion of my project and my stay at Zeus Numerix.
Page 4
Services
Consultancy
Zeus Numerix delivers solutions to a continually expanding number of applications and industries. Our competencies in these technologies stem from the fact that we are engaged in development of engineering analysis packages & implementation of latest state-of-the-art innovations in them. The key technologies that Zeus Numerix masters are: CFD Electromagnetism Structural Analysis Dynamics High Performance Computing
Computational Aerodynamics Aerodynamic configurations recently addressed include: Complete Low Subsonic Civil Aircraft Miniaturized Air Vehicles (MAV) and Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV) Fighter Aircraft: Delta Wing, Multi-role & Trainer Hypersonic Vehicle / Reusable Launch Vehicle Missiles, Rockets and similar Projectiles
Page 5
Products
CFD In the field of Computational Fluid Dynamics, company professionals are providing services and solutions for applications across the industry vertical. Zeus with its pressure based and density based solvers cover the entire task of grid generation, solutions and visualization. Software: CEM Zeus Numerix in the field of Computational Electromagnetics, createdEMWaveZ - a solver for solving Maxwell's Equations and later on came out with a suite, CEMExpert, for solving problems involving electromagnetics. Zeus now provides end-to-end services and solutions using its indigenous and customized CEM software. Pre- and Post-Processors Every engineering problem which requires computational analysis requires a CAD import, grid generation and finally visualization of the results. Keeping this in mind, a number of products have been developed by the company which took external data in different forms, processed it to make them compatible with the solvers and then a post processor to visualize the result. Software: GridZ ViewZ FlowZ CFDExpert-Lite ZNTutor-CFD
Page 6
Introduction to CFD
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a computer based mathematical modeling tool that can be considered the amalgamation of theory and experimentation in the field of fluid flow and heat transfer. It is now widely used and is acceptable as a valid engineering tool in industry. CFD calculations are based upon the fundamental governing equations of fluid dynamics: the conservation of mass, momentum and energy. These equations combine to form the Navier-Stokes equations, which are a set of partial differential equations that cannot be solved analytically except in a limited number of cases.
However, an approximate solution can be obtained using a discretization method that approximates the partial differential equations by a set of algebraic equations. There are a variety of techniques that may be used to perform this discretization; the most often used are the finite volume method, the finite element method and the finite difference method. The resulting algebraic equations relate to small sub-volumes within the flow, at a finite number of discrete locations.
Page 7
Pickup Truck
The continuing increase in fuel price coupled with uncertainty of future supply has created widespread interest in vehicles with high efficiency including pickup trucks. Pickup trucks, vans and SUVs account for 48% of sales fraction of light duty vehicle in United States while light duty vehicles account for approximately 40% of all US oil consumption. Therefore improving the fuel economy of pickup trucks will have tremendous impact on energy security, emission of green house gas and cost of fueling when gasoline price rises.
Today auto manufacturers are competing intensely to produce a powerful pickup truck with better gas mileage in the market regulated with law reinforcement on fuel emissions and consumers need for bigger size truck with more horse powers and cargo capacity. Energy efficiency of vehicles can be improved by reducing the total structural mass, using engine with higher thermally efficiency, or altering the exterior body shape to reduce the aerodynamic drag. According to US department of energy, in urban driving aerodynamic drag accounts for 2.6% of the 12.6% of fuel energy being used to propel the car as shown in Fig. Since the aerodynamic drag increases at higher speeds, the aerodynamic drag on a highway driving accounts for 11% of 20% fuel energy needed to propel the vehicle. Therefore improving vehicle aerodynamics is one of the factors that play crucial role for getting better mileage and better performance including the handling of the vehicle especially at high speeds.
Page 8
Model Design
Grabbing the geometry of the truck under study
The geometry to be studied was searched on the internet and was finally downloaded from Grabcad.com. The downloaded CAD model closely resembles the truck
Geometry cleaning
Geometry cleaning is one of the most important and time consuming part of any CFD analysis. It involves1. Making the geometry air tight.
2. Ensuring no Tripple coons are present. That is there is no junction which has more than two shared surfaces. If present, it is treated as open boundary by the solver.
3. Some amount of geometry cleaning is sometimes also required after the generation of surface and volume mesh to improve the quality of the mesh.
Step added to improve quality of prisms and tetra mesh Flow through a Pickup Truck Page 10
Initial geometry
Final geometry
Page 11
*dimensions in cm
One geometrical change done for this study is the creation of the road and tire interaction zone.
Page 12
Tri element
Surface mesh generating method are also varied depending upon the algorithm and the element type used. Some of them area. Unstructured mesh Consisting of only triangular elements.
Page 13
For this project is have generated both unstructured and hybrid mesh due to the complexity of the geometry and the time restraint, as generating a structured mesh requires more time than the other two meshes. The guidelines followed while creating the surface mesh area. Measure the dimension of the CAD model. This gives us an idea of the maximum size which can be used as a global input. b. Measure the dimensions of the smallest detail to be captured; this gives us an idea of the smallest element size which can be assigned to the model.
c. Decide the physics to be captured and perform the meshing operation accordingly i.e. capture accurately only those parts of the body which might have a part to play in the physics to be captured.
Page 14
Truck bed
d. There must be a smooth transition (growth) of elements both in the same macro and from one macro to the other. As a rule of the thumb the size of adjacent elements of two macros must not be more than 1.2 time of each other. e. The ultimate aim must be to make the best mesh, according to the problem statement, by using the least number of elements. The result of following the above mentioned guidelines was a mesh good enough to capture all the physics intended to be studied. The mesh thus obtained had approximately .2 million elements (both tri and quad).
Page 15
Pickup Truck
Page 16
Minimum aspect ratio is b/w 0.1 and 0.2. So, need to improve the quality of surface mesh. b. Skewness: The skewness of a grid is an apt indicator of the mesh quality and suitability. Large skewness compromises the accuracy of the interpolated regions.
Page 17
Minimum skewness is 0.25. So, skewness of my grid is appropriate. c. Determinant: The Determinant is the ratio of the smallest determinant of the Jacobian matrix divided by the largest determinant of the Jacobian matrix, where each determinant is computed at each node of the element. A Determinant value of 1 would indicate a perfectly regular mesh element, 0 would indicate an element degenerate in one or more edges, and negative values would indicate inverted elements.
Various methods are used to improve the quality of bad elements, depending upon the parameter to be improved. Some of these methods area. Node movement.
Page 18
Page 19
Thus minimum quality achieved is 0.29 which is suitable for generating volume mesh.
Each element has its own advantage and useTetrahedral elements are easy generate and are mostly used when neither viscous forces nor boundary layer is to be captured. Hexahedral and Prism layers are good to capture the boundary layer and the viscous forces. Pyramids are basically used as transition elements between one type of element to another.
For the current project I have used a combination of Prism layer and tetra along with the use of density zone, which would have helped capture all the viscous forces and the boundary layer.
Flow through a Pickup Truck Page 20
Where u* is the friction velocity at the nearest wall, y is the distance to the nearest wall and v is the local kinematic viscosity of the fluid. y+ is often referred to simply as y plus and is commonly used in boundary layer theory and in defining the law of the wall. For my project, y+ factor = 3 was taken (reference: CFD Online) to capture the boundary layer. b. Reynolds number: The Reynolds number characterises the relative importance of inertial and viscous forces in a flow. It is important in determining the state of the flow, whether it is laminar or turbulent. At high Reynolds numbers flows generally tend to be turbulent. From CFD Online, Y+ wall estimation distance (first prism layer height which is very important) was calculated:
which comes out to be 3.7e-5 m. Boundary layer height of .012 m was given in calculations. From first layer height, Boundary layer height and exponential growth rate, 12 prism layers were formed on the truck to capture viscous forces.
Page 21
b. Another approach is to generate a density zone around the object. A density zone is user defined volume in which a user can restrict the size and growth of the volume elements. The commands given in the density zone supersedes those given as a global input for volume meshing.
Page 22
Page 23
Initial quality
Final quality
So, minimum volume mesh quality achieved is 0.18 which is suitable for CFD simulation.
Flow through a Pickup Truck Page 24
Simulation model
Page 25
Flow initialization
Page 26
INLET (yellow)
FARFIELD (red)
GROUND (blue)
OUTLET (black)
INLET Velocity magnitude: 18 m/s, Boundary condition type: BCInflow, Velocity specification method: MAGNITUDE_NORMAL_TO_BOUNDARY OUTLET Outflow static pressure: 0 Pascal, Boundary condition type: BCOutflow VAN Boundary condition type: BCWall Viscous FARFIELD Boundary condition type: SYMMETRY GROUND Boundary condition type: BCWall Viscous
Page 27
Figure given below shows the pressure coefficient plot on the symmetry plane from present simulation. The pressure coefficient plot shows that the stagnation point was created on the front surface of the pickup truck. The pressure coefficient also indicates that CFD simulations have a tendency to overshoot the Cp value at stagnation point. The Maximum Cp value obtained in present simulation was Cp= 1.52
Page 28
Figure given below show pressure coefficient distribution on the tail-out surface of the vehicle on symmetry plane.
Page 29
Figure given below shows the u-velocity plots in at x = 450 in the horizontal plane (z = 73 cm).
The static pressure distribution on the symmetry plane and on the surface of the pickup truck is shown in fig (below), indicating that pressure dooms were created in front of the vehicle and the maximum pressure was created on the front vehicle surface near the bumper. The figure also shows that the low pressure was created in the pickup box and also over the cab of the vehicle, which tends to increase the drag and lift coefficient of the baseline truck. The total pressure distribution in the symmetry plane and over the surface
Flow through a Pickup Truck Page 30
Total pressure distributions over the baseline truck and symmetry plane
Page 31
Page 32
Streamline on z=73 cm The aerodynamic drag and lift coefficients computed from the simulation were Cd = 0.345 and Cl = 0.235 respectively. The non dimension drag coefficient is defined as
Where: Cd : Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient D : Drag force = 125.2 N (calculated through CFD simulations) A : Frontal area of truck = 1.8422 sq. m V : Air density = 1.225 kg/m3 : Air velocity = 18 m/s
However, in the real world pickup trucks manufactured today have a drag coefficient at Cd = 0.463 ~ 0.491. These might be due to the fact that the generic pickup model lacks accessories such as side mirror and windshield wipers. Also in the case of the generic pickup model there were no exposed axles, underbody, radiator cooling vents and many cavities on the surface of the vehicle that connects the inside of the vehicle to the flow.
Conclusion
Flow over the generic pickup model was simulated using CFD and the results from the simulation were validated against CFD results of flow over the same generic model from Yang and Khalighi[1]. The results from present simulation were compared and found to be in agreement. The complex features in the flow fields are well captured in the simulations and the validation with experimental data is very encouraging. To avoid the over-prediction of the turbulent kinetic energy near stagnation points caused by standard k- model, high RE modifications were implemented into CFD analysis.
Page 34
2. Al-Garni, A., Bernal, L., and Khalighi, B., Experimental investigation of the Near Wake of a Pickup Truck, SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0651, 2003. 3. Cooper, K., Pickup trucks Aerodynamics - Keep your tailgate Up, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1146, 2004. 4. Mokhtar, W., Britcher, C., Camp, R.,Further Analysis of Pickup trucks Aerodynamics, SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1161, 2009. 5. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, Edited by Wolf-Heinrich Hucho, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 1998. 6. Barnard, R.H., Road Vehicle Aerodynamic Design-An Introduction, 2nd Edition, Longman ISBN 0-582-24522-2, 1996. 7. White, F.M., Fluid Mechanics 4th Ed. Boston. MA. WCB McGraw-Hill, 1999 8. Ahmed, S.R., Computational Fluid Dynamics, Chapter XV in Hucho, W.H (Ed.), Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, 4th Edition, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1998 9. Munson, Young, Okiishi Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics 4th Edition John Wiley and Sons, 2002
Page 35