You are on page 1of 14

11/12/2010

1
Design Using the Strut-and-Tie
Method, Part 1
ACI Spring 2010 Xtreme Concrete Convention
March 21 - 25, Chicago, IL
ACI Web Sessions
The audio for this web session will begin momentarily and
will play in its entirety along with the slides.
However, if you wish to skip to the next speaker, use the scroll
bar at left to locate the speakers first slide (indicated by the
icon in the bottom right corner of slides 9 and 29). Click on the
thumbnail for the slide to begin the audio for that portion of
the presentation.
Note: If the slides begin to lag behind the audio, back up one
slide to re-sync.
ACI Web Sessions
ACI is bringing you this Web Session in keeping with its
motto of Advancing Concrete Knowledge. The ideas
expressed, however, are those of the speakers and do not
necessarily reflect the views of ACI or its committees.
Please adjust your audio to an appropriate level at this time.
ACI Web Sessions
ACI Web Sessions are recorded at ACI Conventions and
other concrete industry events. At regular intervals, a new set
of presentations can be viewed on ACIs website free of
charge.
After one week, the presentations will be temporarily
archived on the ACI website or made part of ACIs Online
CEU Program, depending on their content.
Fall 2010 ACI Seminars
Concrete Repair Basics
Troubleshooting Concrete Construction
Concrete Slabs on Ground
Anchorage to Concrete
Simplified Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
Chicago, IL 9/28
New York, NY 10/12
Atlanta, GA 11/2
Sacramento, CA 11/16
Dallas, TX 12/7
Denver, CO 9/29
Salt Lake City, UT 10/13
Chicago, IL 11/3
Orlando, FL 12/8
Baltimore, MD 9/30
Phoenix, AZ 10/14
Louisville, KY 11/4
Atlanta, GA 12/2
Richmond, VA 10/5
Detroit, MI 10/7
Pittsburgh, PA 10/28
Little Rock, AR 11/9
Los Angeles, CA 11/30
Des Moines, IA 12/14
Minneapolis, MN 10/6
Boston, MA 10/20
Seattle, WA 11/10
Charlotte, NC 11/17
St. Louis, MO 12/1
Houston, TX 12/15
Visit www.ConcreteSeminars.org for more
information.
ACI conventions provide a forum for networking, learning the
latest in concrete technology and practices, renewing old
friendships, and making new ones. At each of ACIs two
annual conventions, technical and educational committees
meet to develop the standards, reports, and other documents
necessary to keep abreast of the ever-changing world of
concrete technology.
With over 1,300 delegates attending each convention, there is
ample opportunity to meet and talk individually with some of
the most prominent persons in the field of concrete
technology. For more information about ACI conventions,
visit www.aciconvention.org.
ACI Conventions
11/12/2010
2
ACI Web Sessions
This ACI Web Session includes two speakers presenting at
the ACI Xtreme Concrete convention held in Chicago, IL,
March 21
st
through 25
th
, 2010.
Additional presentations will be made available in future ACI
Web Sessions.
Please enjoy the presentations.
Design Using the Strut-and-Tie
Method, Part 1
ACI Spring 2010 Xtreme Concrete Convention
March 21 - 25, Chicago, IL
Daniel Kuchma holds a B.A.Sc., M.A.Sc., and
Ph.D., all in civil engineering, from the
University of Toronto. Since 1997, he has been
an Associate Professor in the department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering at the University
of Illinois, and has taught courses in structural
dynamics, statics, reinforced concrete, and pre-
stressed concrete. His work includes a variety of consulting
projects involving offshore structures, hydroelectric dams,
towers, buildings and specialty structures. Dr. Kuchma is an
active member of ACI, and the Federation International de Beton
(fib). He received a National Science Foundation CAREER
Award on Tools and Research to Advance the Use of Strut-and-
Tie Models in Education and Design. He is also a National
Center for Supercomputing Applications Faculty Fellow and
University of Illinois Collins Scholar.
10
Dan Kuchma
The STM Design Process and
ACI Requirements
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
11
Basis of the Strut-and-Tie Method
B (Beam) and D (Discontinuity) Regions
Basis of the Strut-and-Tie Method
Applications of Strut-and Tie Method
The STM Design Process
ACI Code Provisions for Design Using the STM
Challenges to Design by the STM
12
D
D B B B D D D
D
B
B
B
B B
B
B
D
D
D
D D D
D
h1
h1
h2 h2
h2
h3
h4 h4
h3
h4
Region Strain Condition Design Procedure
B
(Beam or Bernoulli)
D
(Discontinuity or
Disturbed)
Sectional
Complex Empirical, FEM, STM
Region Strain Condition Design Procedure
B
(Beam or Bernoulli)
D
(Discontinuity or
Disturbed)
Sectional
Complex Empirical, FEM, STM
B-Regions and D-Regions
11/12/2010
3
13

T
C
T
C
C C
P
P
2
| > A f T
s y
P
2
|



>

A
f
C
c
c
u
| > A f T
s y
|



>

A
f
C
c
c
u
Basis of the Strut-and-Tie Method
14
Nodal
Zones P
2
P
P
2
C C
T T
C C
Strut
Fill
Fill
Tie
Fill
Conceptual Validity
Basis of the Strut-and-Tie Method
15
Application of Strut-and-Tie Method
Strut Tie Node
16
Examples of Strut-and-Tie Models
Strut Tie Node
Application of Strut-and-Tie Method
17
Examples of Strut-and-Tie Models
Application of Strut-and-Tie Method
18
The STM Design Process
STEP 1
D B
h
h
STEP 2
121 kN
4
4
2
k
N
7
4
7
k
N
4
8
9
k
N
3
2
2
k
N
407 kN
454 kN 810 kN
50
3
k
N
5
9
6
k
N
3
5
6
k
N
383 kN
71 kN
3
5
6
k
N
309 kN-m
3
5
6
k
N
L
71 kN
STEP 3 & 4
3
7
.5
m
m
7
5 m
m
125
m
m
7
5 m
m
5
0
m
m
3 #25
8
#
1
3
8
#
1
6
4 #19
STEP 5 4 #16 two-legged,
closed stirrups
@50 mm
4 #16 two-legged
stirrups @100 mm
2 #13 U bars
2 #19 U bars
3 #25 bars
4 #19 bars
welded to angle
Framing bars 2 #19 2 #13 bars
two-legged
closed stirrups
11/12/2010
4
19
CSA A23.3-84
CEB-FIP Model Code 90
AASHTO LRFD 94
ACI 318-02
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
20

T
C
T
C
C C
P
P
2
| > A f T
s y
P
2
|



>

A
f
C
c
c
u
| > A f T
s y
|



>

A
f
C
c
c
u
Struts, Ties, and Nodal Zones (Joints)
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
21
Struts -- Compression Members
Design Strength of Struts = |F
ns
where F
ns
= f
cs
A
cs
f
cs
= 0.85|
s
f'
c
|
s
= 1.00 for prismatic struts in uncracked compression zones
|
s
= 0.75 when struts may be bottle shaped
and crack control reinforcement* is included
|
s
= 0.60 when struts may be bottle shaped
and crack control reinforcement* is not included
|
s
= 0.40 for struts in tension members
|
s
= 0.60 for other cases
*crack control reinforcement requirement is E
vi
sin
i
> 0.003
| = 0.75 for all elements of truss
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
fc
w
fc
22
Compressive Stress Limit f
cs
= 0.85
s
f
c
v = 0.85 v = 0.51
v = 0.85
v = 0.51 v = 0.51 v = 0.64
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
|
s
= 1.0
|
s
= 0.60 |
s
= 0.75
|
s
= 1.0
|
s
= 0.60
23
Ties Tension Members
Capacity of combined ordinary
and bonded prestressing steel:
Components of Strut-and-Tie Models
F
nt
= A
ts
f
y
+ A
tp
(f
se
+ f
p
)
Note that the tie reinforcement must be spread over a
large enough area such that the tie force divided by
the anchorage area is less than the limiting stress for
that nodal zone.
24
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
11/12/2010
5
25
Nodal Zones (Joints)
Design Strength of Each Nodal Zone Face = |F
nn
where F
nn
= f
cn

Area on Face of Nodal Zone perpendicular to the line of action of the
associated strut or tie force. Again f
cn
= 0.85|
n
f'
c
|
n
= 1.00 in nodes bounded by struts and bearing areas
|
n
= 0.80 in nodes anchoring a tie in one direction only
|
n
= 0.60 in nodes anchoring a tie in more than one direction
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
26
ACI Code Provisions for Design using the STM
Dimensions of Nodal Zones
27
Selection of Shape of the STM Model
Determination of Member Forces in Indeterminate Models
Design for Multiple Load Cases
Uncertainty in Nodal Zones Dimensions
Time Consuming Geometric Calculations
Selecting What Needs to be Checked and Not Checked
Designing for Good Performance Under Service Loads
Validity of Design in Complex Models
Performance under Overloads
Challenges to Design by the STM
28
This method involves imagining that an internal truss, consisting of
concrete struts and steel ties, carries the load through a D(Discontinuity)
Region to its supports. With this idealization, structural design involves
detailing reinforcement to serve as the ties, and checking that the capacity
of the struts and joints (nodal zones) are sufficient to carry the imposed
load.
The nominal compressive strength of the strut can be taken as a stress
limit times the area of the strut. The strength of the ties is equal to the
yield strength of the reinforcement. The strength of each have of a nodal
region can be taken as equal to the perpendicular area of the face to the
direction of the applied loading times the appropriate stress limit. In all
cases, the design strength will be taken as phi times the nominal strength
and this must be greater than the factored applied load.
The (phi) factor for concrete struts, steel ties, and nodal zones shall be
taken as 0.75.
Summary of the Strut-and-Tie Design Method
Leonard De Rooy is Professor and Department
Chair in the Civil and Environmental
Engineering department at Calvin College in
Grand Rapids, Michigan. He holds a B.S.E
from Calvin College and an M.S.E in Civil
Engineering from the University of Michigan.
He is a licensed professional engineer in the
state of Michigan. Mr. De Rooy also spent 13 years as a
Structural Engineer for URS Greiner, where his work included
structural design and retrofit of industrial structures, multistory
steel structures, multistory concrete structures, theaters, and
large high school complexes. He was involved in the design of
Calvin College DeVries Hall, a four-story concrete waffle slab
structure.
Examples for Design of Structural
Concrete with Strut and Tie Models
Example 3: Strut-and-Tie Design and
Detailing of Foundation Grade Beam
Presented by:
Leonard P. De Rooy
Calvin College
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Co-Authored by:
Bob Anderson, URS Corporation
Tim Den Hartigh, URS Corporation
11/12/2010
6
Site Constraints
Existing Site Constraints
Caissons for building 2 placed when building
1 was built.
60 sanitary sewer
Matching existing floors
floor 1 and 2
Parking deck
Location of tower crane.
Structural Model
Used FEM for our modeling.
Input data file > 27,400 lines
Approx 500 load cases
2 models
cracked and uncracked
Modeling
Modeling
11/12/2010
7
Grade Beams
Grade Beams
Grade Beams Grade Beams
Grade Beams
11/12/2010
8
11/12/2010
9
Nodal Zone Node N-4
Node N-4
= 0.75 ACI 318-05 Section 9.3.2.6

n
= 0.80 (one tie) ACI 318-05 Section A.5.2.2
F
nn
= f
ce
A
nz
ACI 318-05 Section A.5
f
ce
= 0.85
n
fc ACI 318-05 Section A.5.2
f
ce
= 0.85 x 0.80 x 5,000 psi = 3,400 psi (23.4 MPa)
Node N-4 Left Face (Force Due to Member E-3)
Factored Design Force = F
ut
= 4,788 k (21,300 kN)
A
nz
= 32 in. x 90 in. = 2,880 in.
2
(1,858,100 mm
2
)
F
nn
= f
ce
A
nz
F
nn
= 0.75 x 3,400 psi x 2,880 in.
2
F
nn
= 7,344,000 lbs = 7,344 k (32,670 kN)
7,344 k > 4,788 k => OK (32,670 kN > 21,300 kN)
Node N-4 Bottom Face (Force Due to member E-13)
Factored Design Force = F
ut
= 6,148 k (27,350 kN)
A
n
= 48 in. x 90 in. = 4,320 in.
2
(2,787,100 mm
2
)
F
nn
= f
ce
A
nz
F
nn
= 0.75 x 3,400 psi x 4,320 in.
2
= 11,016,000 lbs. = 11,016 k (49,000 kN)
11,016 k > 6,148 k => OK (49,000 kN > 27,350 kN)
Node N-4 Top Face (Force Due to Column load)
Factored Design Force = F
ut
= 3,857 k (17,160 kN)
A
n
= 42 in. x 42 in. = 1,764 in.
2
(1,138,100 mm
2
)
Note: the transverse strut-and-tie model converts this area from the
42 in. (1,070 mm) diameter column to an area of
42 in. (1,070 mm) x 90 in. (2,290 mm).
Using the smaller area here is a conservative check.
F
nn
= f
ce
A
nz
F
nn
= 0.75 x 3,400 psi x 1,764 in.
2
= 4,498,200 lbs. = 4,498 k (20,000 kN)
= 4,498 k > 3,857 k => OK (20,000 kN > 17,160 kN)
11/12/2010
10
Alternate Load Path
Final Design Final Design
Final Design Final Design
11/12/2010
11
Final Design Final Design
11/12/2010
12
11/12/2010
13
11/12/2010
14
Click on the text below to go to the web page.
Seminar Schedule Bookstore Web Sessions Conventions
Online CEU Program ACI eLearning Concrete Knowledge Center

You might also like