218

BIBLIOGRAPHY

centenary of the publication of the Investigations , and this anniversary was celebrated with a number of collections examining the Investigations . Included among them are the collections edited by Dan Zahavi and Frederik Stjernfelt ( O ne H undred Years of Phenomenology , 2003), D enis Fisette ( Husserl's Logical Investigations Reconsidered , 2003), Daniel Dahlstrom ( H usserls Logical Investigations, 2005 ), and K wok-ying Lau and John Drummond ( Husserls Logical Investigations in the New Century: Western and Chinese Perspectives , 2007). Husserls other major logical work Formal and Transcendental Logic has been the subject of two extended commentaries: Suzanne Bachelards (1957) La logique de Husserl and Dieter Lohmars (2000) Edmund Husserls Formale und transzendentale Logik. Husserls discussions of intentionality, meaning or sense, temporality, and the self and ego are systematically intertwined, and treatments of any one necessarily touch upon at least som e o f the others. Important treatments of Husserls theory of meaning can be found in M ohantys (1964) Edmund Husserls Theory of Meaning , James Edies (1976) Speaking and Meaning , Ernst Orths (1967) Bedeutung, Sinn, Gegenstand , Sokolowskis Husserlian Meditations and Presence and Absence (1978), and Weltons (1983) The Origins of Meaning and The Other Husserl. There has been much controversy over the interpretation of Husserls theory of intentionality and, in particular, the doctrine of the noema . Aron G urwitsch was am ong the first of H usserl's followers to focus attention specifically upon the noema as a theme (see, for example, Husserls Theory of Intentionality in Historical Perspective, 1967). Gurwitschs view was criticized by H ubert Dreyfus (The Perceptual Noema, 1972), but his criticism simply assumed the interpretation of the noem a forwarded by Dagfinn Fllesdal (Husserls Notion of Noema, 1969) and developed (in a slightly different direction) b y R onald M cIntyre and D avid Woodruff Smith ( Husserl and Intentionality , 1982). That interpretation, in turn, was c ritic iz ed a nd th e G u rw itsc h in te rp re ta tio n d e fe n d e d b y R ic h a r d H o lmes (A n E xp lication of H usse rls T h e o ry o f the N o em a, 1975), Sokolowski (Intentional A nalysis and the N oema, 1984), and Lenore Langsdorf (T he N oema as Intentional Entity, 1984). T here have been attempts to reconcile the varying interpretations; chief among the irenic interpreters are M ohanty ( H usse rl and F re ge ), Welton ( The O rigins of Meaning ), and M ary Jeanne Larrabee (The Noema in Husserls Phenomenology, 1986). Drummond ( Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism , 1990) has denied that the interpretations can be reconciled and, although coming closer to the G urwitsch interpretation, he has criticized both views. Treatments of intentionality lead to discussions of the temporality of consciousness and of inner time-consciousness. On these topics, pioneer-