OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010

Staying Roman - Becoming Greek: the Roman Presence in Greek Cities

1 Introducing the Romans
With the arrival of the Roman legions in the cities of Greece and Asia Minor from the second century BCE, individual Romaioi started to make an appearance in the Greek cities: in Latin texts they are known as the cives romani qui negotiantur (the Romans who are doing business) or as the Romani consistentes (the Romans who are resident). In the Greek inscriptions we find them under names as hoi Romaioi; hoi Romaioi pragmateuomenoi and hoi Romaioi katoikountes. Terminology:
'

A diverse terminology was used to describe a unusually high degree of personal mobility and large scale immigration, that altered the history and the social make-up of the Greek city for ever integrating it into the globalizing world of the Roman empire.1 This is a draft version, and the annotation is still limited. The terms globliazation is of course a modern concept that is usually applied only to the study of the modern world, mainly from an economic perspective. Although this seems to change, as I have seen (but not yet read) studies that apply this concept to footbal, or other cultural forms such as music. Chris Bayly has suggested the term archaic globalisation for earlier forms of globalising proceses, (with an emphasis on the developments round the Indian Ocean). He applies his analysis also to the cultural and religious fields. Bayly, C. A. (2002). 'Archaic' and 'modern' globalization in the Eurasian and African arena. c. 1750-1850. Globalization in world history. A. G. Hopkins. London, Pimlico: 46-73, Bayly, C. A. (2004). The Birth of the Modern World. Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.In a

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010

This paper is meant as preliminary study to set the contours for a PhD project, I want to explore some elements of emigration of Romans into the Eastern Mediterranean and on their collective- role in the Greek cities. I shall not consider the often complicated ways in which the Roman state got involved with - even entangled in the Hellenistic East, I shall not speak about senatorial Philhellenism, or about the political or economical motives behind Roman imperialism. Nor shall I discuss the instruments of empire -although tax farmers will make an occasional appearance. In this paper I shall discuss the in rough chronological order how Roman traders got integrated into the kosmos opf the city and on some of the effects of their presence, especially in the imperial perio I discuss four aspects of Roman presence: contents 1: Starting in the Republic , I shall first discuss the settlement of individual Romans in the Greek cities, with special attention for their participation in social and cultural sides of Greek civic life 2: I shall then discuss on the basis of some political-religious ritual practices how the Greek cities responded by granting the Romans a collective status, though which they were allowed to connect with the kosmos of the later Greek polis 3: I shall then discuss how in the imperial period Romans were getting fully enshrined in urban life, by organizing themselves in more formally structured associations that seem to have acquired a quasi-political status in the cities. 4: Finally I shall argue that in this form they appear to have acted as political cultural mediators as brokers between the Greek cities and Rome. There are two major omissions: I shall skip in this paper an important phase: the troubles of the first century BCE and more in particular the Ephesian Vespers the massacres of the Mithridatic wars and their aftermath. Nor shall I discus the Romans in Delos, which was not a normal Greek city, and which I suspsect distort the picture. These I shall have leave to a different occasion, but I had to begin somewhere.

Who were the Romaioi?

Romaioi in greek cities

recent article on the role of athletes and performers as the cultural agents of aglobalising roman empire I have used the term ancient globalisation, as Archaic would be confusing. van Nijf, O. M. (2006). Global players: Athletes and performers in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Between Cult and Society. The cosmopolitan centres of the ancient Mediterranean as setting for activities of religious associations and religious communities (Special Issue of Hephaistos,Kritische Zeitschrift zu Theorie und Praxis der Arcologie und angrenzender Gebiete). I. Nielsen. Hamburg, van Nijf, O. M. (2006). "Global players: Griekse atleten, artiesten en de oikoumene in de Romeinse keizertijd." Leidschrift..

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010

Economic interests
Even though Roman foreign policy was not mercantilist in the sense that it was shaped by the commercial interests; it is still obvious that the presence of Romaioi was closely connected with the growth of empire, even though it was more a case of trade following the flag, than the other way around. Romaioi were active in a range of economic activities: they appeared as shippers (naukleroi) traders (mercatores or negotiatores),2 but equally as financiers and moneylenders (trapezitai). In the words of Malcolm Errington In fact they seem to have turned a hand to anything that could bring in a handsome profit, and appear almost anywhere where reasonably ordered commercial conditions could be found.3 However, as all entrepreneurs in pre-industrial economies, they would invest their money as soon as possible in the only stable source of income, land. So quite a few Romaioi were in fact (colonial) landowners: which is in fact proven in some inscriptions that list them explicitly as landowners: romaioi engaiountes etc. Romaioi were clearly among the main beneficiaries of the growing empire, but they had an active function in this process as well. It is probably redundant to add that the economic activities of these Romaioi would have included tax farming: the Roman state practiced what we now call outsourcing or privatization, by farming the provincial taxes to companies of publicani, that were based in Rome, but with large networks in the provinces. In Greek cities you would, therefore, also encounter all kinds of Roman publicani, ranging from high ranking negotiatores who had a stake in a tax-farming company, their agents who negotiated with the authorities of the Greek cities, as well as the more humble telonai, who were had the job of actually extracting the money from the Greek cities, or from traders and travellers who passed by the toll-stations along the borders of city territories and tax regions.4 The reputation of these publicans for rapacity and corruption is well-known, not to say notorious. But tax-farmers and moneylenders may have colluded, and all negotiatores were implicated in the exploitation of the Greek provinces. Together with the Roman soldiers, such men would have represented to many, the (ugly) face of Roman imperialism. To the Greeks there may have been simply not too much difference, as became in fact clear in the early first century BC. When Roman negotiatores and publicani the usual villains- were so closely associated, that they were massacred together during one of the most terrible events of the first Mithridatic War the so-called Ephesian Vespers in the spring of 88 BC. The eighty thousand Romans or more that are reputed that were massacred were surely not only tax farmers.

The term negotiator seems to have conveyed the idea of trade and commerce on a wider scale, and may have given them an air of respectability 3 Errington, R. M. (1988). Aspects of Roman acculturation in the East under the Republic. Alte geschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift fr K. Christ zum 65. Geburtstag. P. K. a. V. Losemann. Darmstadt: 140-157., 143 4 See Van Nijf (Forthcoming) The social world of Roman Tax farmers.

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Although I shall not discuss these events, It is worth pointing out, however, that the stories about the thousands of Roman victims of the Mithridatic Wars prove at least that the Romans must have had a sizeable presence in the Greek cities. It is a fact of Roman imperial history, that many Romans had settled in the Greek cities, and that they had a role to play there. Is it possible to come to a more positive appreciation of the nature of their involvement in these communities? It has been argued (by Ferrary among others) that it is very difficult to appreciate the relationships between the Romaioi and the Greek city in the Republican period, but it is worth making the attempt.5

Greek cities
Where do we find these Romans? It is clear that we should differentiate between the different types of cities: the integration of the Romans did not happen everywhere in the same pace or along the same lines. Jean Louis Ferrary has recently argued that Roman business men would have been particularly attracted to cities where Roman magistrates and pro-magistrates were based.6 The absence of a system of international law would have made it attractive for Roman traders to have easy access to a Roman official with imperium or iuris dictio, who could guarantee the security of personnel and property, and intervene when transactions went wrong. Roman traders will have sought protection one way or another: protection of the law where available, but there is sufficient evidence to proof that they will have resorted to exerting pressure and bullying or buying their way around where necessary. In these bigger centres, Romans may have been numerous enough to form a kind of large expat-communities, but Romans were also to be found in smaller or larger numbers- in many different smaller cities. We find evidence for the presence of associations and groups of Romaioi in many cities, including as Pagai, Amorgos, Adramytteion, Priene, Abydos, Ilion Erythrae and many others (but the number of cities in which individual Romaioi are attested is many times greater), where they will have had to accommodate themselves to their new environment and way of life more or less on their own. What was the place in the cities of these settlers? Were they all (hated?) outsiders, or do we find evidence of their integration within the kosmos of the polis?

Romans and other foreigners

To appreciate this we need to know how Greek cities normally coped with foreigners. Foreign traders had existed before, of course: the major Greek harbours had always hosted larger or smaller numbers of foreigners, who often banded together, and developed a collective identity on the joint basis of origin, shared cult or occupation. On an individual basis, these men could be integrated into the kosmos of the polis as metics which offered them a form of integration, but stopping short of full blown Ferrary, J.-L. (2001). Rome et la gographie de l'hellnisme: rflexions sur les "hellnes" et "panhellnnes" dans les inscriptions d'poque romaine. The Greek East in Roman context. Proceedings of a colloquium organised by the Finnish Institute at Athens, May 21-and 22 , 1999. O. Salomies. Helsinki, Finnish Institute at Athens: 1936. 6 Ibid.
5

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 citizenship. Occasionally groups of foreigners were sometimes allowed privileges: temples, headquarters and burial places. In some cases they were also allowed to express their own ethnic and religious identity collectively in public ritual. In most cases this was a matter of toleration than of complete integration, however: even though the Thracian Bendis worshippers of Athens seem have been connected to aspects of city life, these men and their associations remained ultimately outsiders, marginal to the concerns of the Greek city. So, what happened when Roman xenoi began to establish themselves in the Greek cities? The fact that they came in incomparably large numbers, and that they were backed by what was rapidly becoming a Mediterranean superpower, must have made a difference. As I said, much of the scholarly interest in these Romans has focused on the tensions that they caused. However, in an interesting article of 1988, Robert Malcolm Errington has taken a different perspective: he investigated aspects of Roman acculturation in the East, focusing on the (mainly epigraphic) evidence for Roman settlers and traders.7 Errington shows that there is evidence that -right from the start- Romans were actively participating in many aspects of the life of the city. There is particularly good epigraphic evidence for the integration of Romans in the world of the gymnasia and festivals.

Romans as athletes and ephebes

We are all aware of the crucial role of athletic training in the gymnasium and athletic competition in the religious festivals for the creation of Greek identity at a personal level, and at the level of cities.8 Moreover, these manifestations of Greek culture underwent an explosive growth precisely in the Hellenistic period: festivals were founded in increasing numbers and the gymnasia of this period developed into monumental masterpieces that started to play a crucial role - as a second agora it has been said- in the social, cultural and political life of the cities. From the third century BCE we see individual Romaioi are.9 From the second c. BCE Romaioi appear as participants in and, not infrequently, as victors of a growing number of games and festivals throughout the Greek world. From the mid 2nd century this became quite common: in 142 BC a long list of victors at the Athenian Theseia (HDT 1) list a Roman as the victor of the hoplomachia (armed fight);10 around the same time we find that in Chalkis in one single year no less than 5 Romans won at the local Herakleia (HDT 2). And there are many other examples: a list of victors of the Errington, R. M. (1988). Aspects of Roman acculturation in the East under the Republic. Alte geschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift fr K. Christ zum 65. Geburtstag. P. K. a. V. Losemann. Darmstadt: 140-157.. 8 I have discussed this question i.a in: van Nijf, O. (1999). "Athletics, festivals and Greek identity in the Roman East." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 175-200. 9 In fact the first attested Roman victories at traditional Greek Games go back to the end of 3rd century, when Roman athletes took part in (and won) the great Panhellenic Games of the Isthmia of 228. Cassius Dio reports the name of the victor as Plautus, and many modern historians may have their suspicions about his identity. Yet, Roman participation in Greek games seems plausible enough. 10 IG II.2, 960
7

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Romaia (HDT3)of Xanthos includes a Roman victor in the major horse race: Caius Octavius Pollio, who even had himself announced as a Telmessian.11 The success of these festivals, and the increasing participation and athletic successes of Romans in them, are indeed an indication of the successful integration of Romans in Greek cities and certainly in their gymnasia. For, in order to succeed in these contests with the best full-time Greek athletes, the Romaioi must have been frequenting the Greek gymnasia for some time. Errington identifies in fact quite a number of Romans among the ephebes 12who trained in the gymnasia, that were gradually opening up to foreigners: from big centres like Athens and Pergamon to smaller ports as Naxos and Larissa. But their acculturation went beyond the mere adoption of Greek physical culture: it must rank as a sign of the thorough cultural integration of Roman expats, that they were also able to win in literary contests as well: A Quintus Ocrius Quinti Filius (HDT 4)is on record as the victor in a competition for the Egkomion logikon (contest in laudatory rhetoric) at Tanagra in Boeotia, and a man called Publius Romaios (not on HDT)won the second prize in the dramatic competition of the Sarapieia in the same place at the turn of the second to first century BCE. Roman traders may have had a modest social status in their home country, but whatever their status in Italy, in the East young Romans were able join the jeunesse dore of the Greek cities who spent their time in the gymnasia and share in their athletic and intellectual pursuits. This can only have promoted their successful integration into their host communities. Membership of the ephebeia would even open up the road to local citizenship - whatever the Roman rules about the incompatibility between roman and local citizenship

Romans as benefactors
Errington also mentions as another symptom of their integration the willingness of some Romaioi to invest in their host communities as benefactors: from the third century Roman benefactors we find large numbers of monumental inscriptions that rewarded Roman benefactors for their generosity with proxenia (appointment as an official friend of the city i. a kind of honorary consul), proedria (the right to reserved seats in the front rows at games) ateleia (exemption from import/export duties), ges enktesis (the right to own property) in sum by all the traditional Greek rewards for public generosity. Robert, L. (1978). "Catalogue agonistique des Rmaia de Xanthos." Revue Archologique: 277-290 [= OMS VII, no 176].. - Incidentally, this texts shows that many of these games had their part to play in the symbolic integration of Greek cities in the Roman imperial system. From the third onwards we also find games in traditional Greek style that were celebrated in honour of Rome the Romaia- that were celebrated separately or joined with existing festivals, as for example in Xanthos where the Koinon (league) of the Lycian cities organised Roman Games. I shall discuss this feature in more detail in a forthcoming paper Sporting for Rome: Greek athletic festivans in the servie of the cult of Rome and the Emperors. 12 NB the ephebeia was of course an entry into citizenship. Cf Habicht
11

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Errington suggests that this implies a basic identity of interest between the Greek communities and the Roman traders, but I am less optimistic about this identity of interest and the civic spirit of these benefactors and magistrates. This type of honorific inscriptions was often set up for individuals who were not so much members of the community, but outsiders who somehow towered over the cities, like kings, military commanders, and magnates. Many of the inscriptions were actually set up for Roman bankers and moneylenders. The tone of the honorific inscriptions set up for them suggest that rather than as local men, such men were seen as powerful outsiders who held the cities more or less in their grip. An example of this is an honorific text for the Cloatii Marcus and Nemerius (HDT 5) who were proclaimed proxenoi and euergetai by the city of Gytheion on account of their devotion and honourable ambition towards the city, but who also appear to have been the citys main creditors.13 Since Numerius and Marcus Cloatius, sons of Numerius Romans proxenoi and benefactors of our city, from the beginning have continued to act justly both towards our polis and, privately towards those of the citizens who approached them (with a request) , never lacking in zeal and honourable ambition, because of which the city gratefully made public mention and voted suitable honours for them, in the year of Lachares magistracy when they were negotating our release from the obligations of the first loan; and in the year of Phleinos magistracy, when concerning the second loan of 3965 drachmas, which the city had borrowed in the year of Damarmanos magistracy, they accepted the people of Athens, as arbitratror in the time of Marcilius and then after being implored by the citizens they permitted the payment of what the citizens persuaded them etc This is the benefaction of a couple of loan sharks: Euergetism, like patronage, is often a myth used to dress up fundamentally skewed relationships. We have no way of telling how often a honorific monument was used to present a respectable faade to a relationship that turned around extortion and fear. I conclude therefore, that these instances do not tell us much about the social integration of the Romans in these cities, or about an identity of interest

Collective presence of Romans in civic festivals:

My discussion has focused so far mainly on the evidence for individual Romaioi, who were often identified on the basis of their names. Such men may have been integrated in their cities, but in the end they were (albeit important, wealthy or powerful) treated not fundamentally differently from other (wealthy) foreigners. What I want to discuss now, however, is evidence for collective action, or rather for a collective presence of Romans as a recognizable group with a special status in the city. To find out more about this, we can investigate the rich evidence for the ritual life of the post-classical Greek cities. Civic rituals and ceremonies, and in particular sacrificial banquets and processions are a particularly good place to look as these often serve as a dramatic representation of the social and political order in the city.
13

IG 5.2, 1146.

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Moreover, regulations about and records of ritual activities often list the participants, and can serve as a kind of Who is who? in the Hellenistic city. In this context I can only discuss to the public banquets, that were organized by priests, magistrates or benefactors in the Greek cities of the Hellenistic period. Banquets (and especially sacrificial banquets) had always been a major event in Greek cities. The distribution of sacrificial meat, which is at the core of banquets, had always been one an important collective activity. In the words of Pauline SchmittPantel who has studied public commensality in the Greek city, participation in the civic sacrifices and the civic banquets is of the same nature as integration into the civic group. Rules about participation to Greek civic banquets had always been strict. In the third part of her study Schmitt-Pantel investigates the development of public commensality in the Hellenistic period. She shows how the organization of public banquets responded to, and was a factor in, the structural transformation of Greek polis society in this period. Just as Greek cities were gradually taking on a more cosmopolitan character there was also A gradual widening of the groups that were entitled to participate, and an increasing participation of strangers in these quintessential civic rituals.14 From the second century BC onwards we find that Roman citizens got invited to these banquets, as a separately mentioned category. The earliest examples are found in Eretria (IG 12.9, 234)15 (not on handout) and Aigiale on Amorgos (IG 12, 7, 515)16 (HDT 7), but they are also found in Priene, Pergamon, Kyme, Eresos (Lesbos), et Pagai (Megaris). What is important to me here is that in these case the Roman visitors were not singled out individually, as before, but listed collectively as hoi Romaioi (The Romans) apparently they had become a group that was both recogniseable and considered important. This is clearly an indication that they had developed a corporate status, a collective identity that was now being recognised by the organisers of the civic banquets: i.e by city authorities, magistrates and benefactors. It is important to note here the difference with the other foreigners (non-citizens), who were normally simply referred to collectively as xenoi (foreigners), but who were rarely identified by their individual place of origin.

une ouverture plus grande du groupe des ayants droit et la participations frquente des trangers, quils soient domicilis dans la cits ou de passage. SP 490 15 at the sacred gathering of the Artemisia he met the expenses of the unguents out of his own pocket; accepting this expense not only for the citizens but for the rest of those who attended the gathering and shared common privileges, and, in undertaking the sacrifice to Hermes, he invited by public proclamation both the citizens and those Romans who were resident, and on the fourth day he banqueted those who shared the common privileges and on the fifth others of the citizens and many of the strangers 16 ... he provided a deipnon (meal) to all citizen who happened to be in Aigiale and the residents and the foreigners and those of the Romans who happened to be present and their sons (or wives)

14

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 There are some caveats here: this may not have happened everywhere at the same rate, and the inclusion of the Romans may at times have been a personal choice of the benefactor who paid for the banquets. This was so in the case of Kritolaos, the benefactor from Aigiale who was one of the first to invite the Romans (2BC), but this appears to have been still the case at the end of the first century BC when the benefactor Kleanax invited Romans to a number of banquets in Kyme (SEG 32, 1243) (HDT 8)17. But the effect will have been the same: to single them out as a special category: Romans could be invited collectively to take part in festivals and ritual occasions that were organised in the polis where they distinguisghed (in the banquets) from citizens on the one hand and other foreigners on the other. This lifted the Romans to an intermediate level also somewhat between foreigners and citizens. Yet, a certain ambiguity remained: the Romaioi were invited as a recogniseable group, above other foreigners, but in the end, they remained -and were listed as- foreigners, outsiders to the city.But Roman traders, and even Roman residents, were still relatively marginal to the Greek cities. They lived in the cities, but they were not a fully integral part of the cities. Yet, an important step had been made which had repercussion throughout the Greek world. Epigraphic material from Delos illustrates this from an other perspective: early Delian inscriptions often refer to Athenians, Roman and other xenoi (foreigners), but from the first century inscriptions on the island start refer to Athenians, Romans and other Greeks, which was clearly a major upgrade in the status of the Romans - from a Greek perspective. A process of adaptation and acculturation had apparently been set into motion, that would continue well into the Imperial period.

III Getting organised Romans in Greek cities of the Principate

So far I have been discussing the Romaioi of the Hellenistic (or Republican) era, but now I shall discuss the developments in the imperial period - with a focus more on Asia Minor than on Greece. At the end of the first century BC the epigraphical record of Roman traders and settlers shows two fundamental changes. First a quantitative change: There is a sharp increase in the number of texts that refer to associations of Romans. In Asia Minor alone we know about 20 inscriptions from the Republican period, but in the first centuries AD their number quadruples to about 80. I havent done the numbers yet for all the areas, but it is my impression that they rose as well in Greece and the islands. But a more important development is qualitative. During the late Hellenistic period Romaioi had appeared largely in the inscriptions that were set up by others, by natives of the Greek cities in which they were mentioned as guests to public banquets and other festivities, as a privileged category, as [pseudo-]benefactors or as victors in games. ... As the first and only person he hosted in the prytaneion (town hall) the citizens and the Romans and the foreigners and after a proclamation he gave a treat in the market place to the Hellenes by Phyle (district) and to the Romans, and the residents and the foreigners
17

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 But from the late first century onwards the situation seems to be reversed. Romans start to appear in their own right, as the collective authors of public inscriptions in the Greek cities: the greater part of the evidence was produced by the Romans themselves They started to use themselves actively the Greek monumental language in order to claim a place in the civic world. My interest here, is not so much to explain this rise, but rather to draw attention to the effects of this manner of Romans selfrepresentation and to the implication of this self-fashioning for their role in the civic communities. It is important to emphasise that many of these texts were set up by Romans as a group, as a community. They present themselves as a clearly demarcated group with a corporate identity, and capable of taking collective action. They behave like civic bodies: They have magistrates, and make decisions, pass decrees, erect buildings and set up their own inscribed monuments in public space; in every respect they mimick the established civic institutions. In my book I dubbed this development, that we also find with other types of associations, ordo-making. In some cases they even started to behave like proper cities (or like other building blocks of empire such as provincial koina, and associations of performers18) by sending out envoys especially to Romejust as though they were cities themselves. In short the epigraphic record suggest that the Romans started to organise themselves formally and that they began to play a more active role in the public sphere of their host communities.

10

The status of Romaioi: conventus?

There has been some interest in the exact legal status of the organizations of Romans in Greek cities. Unfortunately it is not always easy to understand the exact nature of the relationship between these associations and the cities. Traditionally it has been suggested by Kornemann and Schulten- that they operated in the form of a conventus which was supposedly a formal body instituted in each city by the Roman state under a kind of state appointed direction: curatores, (Kornemann). There are some texts that support this view, such as an inscriptions from Hierapolis in Phrygia (Judeich 32 (HDT 9) where the Romans honour a conventarch: The most shining boule (council) and the most shining demos ( people) of Hierapolis and the gerousia (council of elders) and the synedrion of the Romaioi and the neoi (young men) and the associations have repeatedly honoured Ageleius Apollonides from Ania, a man who belonged to (a family of) excellent councillors, who was a strategos of the city and agoranomos (market supervisor) and dekaprotos (one of the ten rich men who were responsible for the payment of central taxes) and 'conventarch' (Greek for official responsible for the conventus) of the For an interpretation of associations of athletes and perfoprmers as quasi agents in the servie of Rome see my: van Nijf, O. M. (2006). Global players: Athletes and performers in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Between Cult and Society. The cosmopolitan centres of the ancient Mediterranean as setting for activities of religious associations and religious communities (Special Issue of Hephaistos,Kritische Zeitschrift zu Theorie und Praxis der Archologie und angrenzender Gebiete). I. Nielsen. Hamburg..
18

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Romans, and responsible for the oil distributions, and formerly auditor, and supervisor of public building, who had shown himself most useful on matters to do with the emperor (?) and from Thyateira in Lydia (TAM 5.2, 1002) HDT 10: The leather workers honour T. Flavius Alexander of the tribus Quirina son of Metrophanes, having been agoranomos for 6 months with vim and vigour, and with many expenses, having been curator of the Roman conventus, having been 3 times ambassador to the emperor in Rome, and having succeeded in his missions concerning large sums of money, having been priest of Artemis at his own expense, piously and generously, and who has dedicated... on behalf of Flavia Alexandra and Flavia Glycinna his daughters. But there are some problems: the term conventus for a group of traders is awkward, as these conventus would have to have been distinguished from the juridical conventus, which had a precise and recogniseable meaning of court districts, as well as the court assemblies that were held there on fixed days with the governor presiding. Moreover, it is not clear to that the term conventus of traders was universally adoptedand even less that it was promoted by the Roman state. This view was, therefore, discredited, i.a. by Hatzfeld, but in an unpublished Leiden MA thesis, Hermann Roozenbeek has argued that we need to reconsider our views, as these groups of Roman residents and traders must have had a kind of more formal status. He suggests that these conventus were linked to the cities in a kind of sympoliteia (joined citizenship), which would have given them a separate status and a close link to the city at the same time: again an expression that is found in the epigraphical record: sympoliteia (IGR 3, 294) (HDT 11). [] The Boule and the Demos of the Isaurians and the Romans who are in joined citizenship with us (have decided etc) However, I am not sure that this solution can be employed in all cases. Surely not all Romans in all cities would have established a formal settlement that could be described in terms of sympoliteia. In some cases groups of Romans seem to have an identity that exceeded the limits of an individual city: various inscriptions refer to the Romans that were active in a region or an entire province, which suggests that these associations could have a translocal character, which would preclude any idea of sympoliteia. We find, for example evidence of Groups that were active all over the province associations of Romaioi (HDT 12) : (IEphesos 5, 1517) The Roman businessmen throughout Asia And In Smyrna (IK 24.1, 642) . The Roman businessmen in Asia

11

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 For the purpose of this paper I suggest that we leave this matter open: I for one am ready to accept that associations of Romans often enjoyed a permanent and fixed status in the cities, but that the precise legal installation of such groups could differ from case to case, and that it may have been a matter of local conditions and local preferences.

12

Civic identity
More important than their legal status is to see what these Romans were actually doing in the cities, and how they expressed their role in what I have called the civic world. It is quite obvious that these Romans often expressed a close tie, if not their identity, with the Greek cities in which they were active. Associations of Roman negotiatores often had titles that clearly indicated their belonging to a particular city They could be known as (HDT 13) - (Chios 5-14 AD SEG 22, 507) The Romans who are with them - [ ] .) (Ilion IK 3, 230) The Romans who are living in Ilion - ' in Assos (IK 4, 26) The Romans who do business amongst us (change of perspective) - (Kyzikos, SEG 28, 953) The Romans who do business in the city - E I or (Ephesos, IEphesos 3, 800) The Roman (or Italian) traders who do business in Ephesos. - O T , in Tralleis, ITralleis, 77 The Romans who live in Tralleis - IIasos 90 The Romans who do business in Iasos And such examples could easily be multiplied. I Erythrae 2, 405: Another perhaps stronger argument for their increasing identification with the interests of the city and hence of their integration into the city- is to be found on honorific monuments and dedications that were set up by the Romans for local priests, magistrates and benefactors of the city as a whole. The first instances of this identification are to be found on funerary monuments that simply represented side by side the honorific crowns that the deceased had received from the city and from groups such as the Romans HDT 14 in corona: dmos [ ---- son of Krateas , (greetings good man) in corona Romans But later texts were much more detailed. When we consider the aforementioned inscriptions from Hierapolis and Thyateira we see Romans appearing as a civic institution, passing its honorific decrees for important citizens. Such inscriptions highlighted the essential solidarity of the Romaioi with the city, and by adopting the discourse of public praise the Romaioi now showed that they had

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 effectively internalised the core values of their host communities. Initially the Roman associations acted still alone, but it became increasingly common that Romaioi appeared as the (joint) authors of inscriptions and even decrees, alongside cities, or alongside political institutions of cities, suggesting that they were fully integrated in the decision making process. This phenomenon, which we encounter also in the case of artisanal collegia associated the Romans even closer to the core interests of the city in which they were active. A text from Apameia in Phrygia shows that the Romans were even allowed to take part in a pandemos ekklesia a general assembly- which a clear sign of a near full social and political integration in the city. IGR 4 791; formal status HDT 15 The boule and the demos and the resident Romans, at a plenary meeting of the assembly, honour Publius Manneius Ruso, son of Publius, of the tribe Romilia, a good and high-minded man for the benefactions of his ancestors and his own comparable benefactions towards the fatherland. He frequently nourished the city in difficult circumstances and he led embassies to the emperors concerning many useful matters, and he obtained generosities from the imperial priests, and he was a friend of the people at every occasion and he increased the income of the people. The statue was set up by the tradesmen (ergastai) of the Thermaia Plateia. Eumenes son of Dionysios and Iulius son of Doubassion were responsible. In accordance with a decree of the city. These examples show, I think that full integration into the city, that an identity of interest was not, as Errington suggested achieved, when Romans started to appear as the recipients of civic honour, but rather when they start to side with the cities and make an appearance as the authors of inscriptions and honorific monuments for civic benefactors.

13

IV Romaioi as cultural and political brokers

Having said that, it want to emphasise that this was not simply a case of Romans going native, of simply Romans becoming Greek as it were, thereby gradually shedding their Roman character and loosening their links with Rome. On the contrary: Romanness was the basis of their name and of the identity of their organization, and it was exactly in becoming Greek and simultaneously staying Roman that they were able to maintain links with Rome and that they found their ultimate raison dtre. In this final part I want to discuss the evidence that the Romans started to play an ideologically significant role as agents in the representation of the emperor and of imperial power in the cities of the Greek provinces. It is quite obvious that the self-representation of these associations of Romaioi was often closely bound up with the representation of Rome itself an imperial power. About half the number of inscriptions that were set up by associations of Romans in Asia Minor (that is to say 40 out of 80) - were used to convey in one way or another loyalty to the city of Rome and most of all to the emperors. (also in Greece most of

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 the inscriptions set up by the Romaioi were in one way or another declarations of loyalty). dedications (HDTS 16, 17, 18, 19) Dedications - IK 4. 240 : Thea Rome, benefactress of the world - IK 4, 13: Gaius Caesar hgemon of the neotes (princeps juventutis) by the dmos and the Roman traders - IK4, 19 to Livia Hera - IEphesos 2, 409 To Claudius - IGR 4, 684 To Domitian and the Demos Romain Moreover many other inscriptions that were not used to explicitlly for the emperor can still be read as an expression of loyalty with Rome: The inscriptions set up by the Romaioi include a large number of honours for Roman (pro)magistrates and imperial priests or other individuals who were concerned with he local representation of Rome And a striking number was involved or at least concerned with the sending of ambassies to Rome, or with praising past ambassadors. PPT 19 Mantineia (HDT 21) the city of the Antigoneans and the Roman businessmen there honour Epigone, their benefactress as well as her husband who: having paid for a variety of benefactions to the polis he went beyond the boundaries of Hellas and sailed until the signet ring of the Augustus19, over the Adriatic - a sea that even the coastal residents hesitate to sail only once, he the landlubber despised by sailing it a second time Maroneia Only a few years ago Kevin Clinton published an inscription that illustrates this interest in a spectacular fashion. I am talking of course about the decree from Maroneia on the privileges the city wanted reconfirmed under Claudius. This is a decree by Boule and demos, in praise for a successful embassy to the emperor Claudius (who is hailed as the most conspicuous god of the universe and creator of new blessings for all men) as well as making provisions for future embassies to deal with new threats to the citys freedom and privileges. It is striking that this degree was passed on a gnome (resolution) of a selection of civic groups: HDT 22

14

A cumbersome way to express meeting the emperor in person (charaktera implies kissing of the signet ring; it was suggested by Kostas Burasleis that the charaktera refer to the signing by the emperor of an imperial rescript which it would have been tne purpose of the ambassador to obtain.

19

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Resolution of the bouleutai and priests and the magistrates and the Romans residents in the city and all other citizens This text shows how the Roman residents - as the co-sponsors of the decree- were playing a major part in organising and regulating the relations between the city and the emperor. Moreover, the texts also shows how the mention of the Romans in the series of decision making bodies contributed to a new representation of local society- not as an isonomic community- but as a hierarchy of status groups that were linked symbolically and effectively to the imperial centre: other examples of this practice (alo involving romans) are not difficult to find: the text from Apamaiea in Phrygia that I mentioned earlier (where the Romans took part in a pandemos ekklesia) was another. But the most spectacular example of this practice is found in a long inscription of Assos that I shall quote in full:20 Assos (HDT 23) IK 4.26 In the consulship of Gnaeus Acerronius Proculus and Gaius Pontius Petronius Nigrinus. The Assians on motion of the people. Whereas the rule of Gaius Caesar Germanicus Augustus, hoped and prayed for by all men, has been proclaimed and the world has found unended joy and every city and every people has been eager for the sight of the god since the happiest age for mankind has now begun, it was decreed by the council and the Roman businessmen among us and the people of Assos to appoint an embassy chosen from the foremost most distinguished Romans and Greeks to seek an audience and congratulate him, and beg him to remember the city with solicitude, as he personally promised when together with his father Germanicus he first set foot in our city's province. Oath of the Assians: We swear by Zeus the Savior and by the deified Caesar Augustus and by the ancestral Holy Maiden, to be loyal to Caius Caesar Augustus and all his house and to regard as friends whomever he chooses and as enemies whomever he censures. If we remain faithful to our oath may it go well with us; if we swear falsely the opposite. The envoys proposed themselves voluntarily at their own expense Caius Varius C.F. Voltinia Castus Hermophanes son of Zolos Kttos so. Pisistratos What we have here, is a decree of the city of Assos referring to a joint decision of the city and the Romans to send envoys to Caligula on the occasion of his elevation to the imperial purple. The envoys conveyed the citys congratulations, but also the text of a public oath of loyalty in which the Romans joined in with the Greeks of Assos. IK 4. 26. Other texts that show the involvement of the Roman communities in such declarations of loyalty, include a text of the year 3BC that records the oath of loyalty sworn to Augustus by the inhabitants of Paphlagonia. The Romans from Assos were clearly not exceptional.
20

15

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Joined in is perhaps not the right expression as the Romaioi seem to have had a pole position among the authors of the decree: as in the text from Akmoneia they were mentioned after the boule but before the demos which clearly shows that they had played an active -perhaps initiating- part in the negotiations, and which the city recognised. And, finally, the leading role of associations of Romans in establishing links with Rome is also in evidence on a long inscriptions from Klaudiou Neapolis in Paphlagonia. When in about 5 BCE the province Paphlagonia was created, all inhabitants took an oath of loyalty to Augustus and his descendants:21 IGR Gangra HDT 24 .. on the day before the Nones of march (6 March) in Gangra, in camp (or in the agora) , the oath completed by the inhabitants of Paphlagonia and the Romans who do business among them: "I swear by Zeus, eart, Sun, all the godsand goddesses and Augustus himself that I will be favourably disposed toward Caesar Augustus and his children and descendants all the time of my life in word and deed and thought .... etc. In the same words was this oatch sworn by all the inhabitants of the land in the temples of Augustus throughout the districts of the province, by the altars of Augustus. And likewise the Phazimomians living in what is now called Neapolis swore the oath, all of them, in the temple of Augustus by the altar of Augustus Again we see that the Romans took a prominent part in this highly charged occasion. It would appear then that the one of the functions of these associations of Romans in the civic world of the Greek city was somehow to monitor or channel the symbolic exchanges between the Greek cities and the imperial center. It is not possible to establish whether in these cases the Romans took the initiative, or whether they merely responded to local demands or pressures, but that may be besides the point. One way or another, the associations of Romans in Greek cities had an important part to play as a exemplry trait dunion, as the political and cultural brokers in a globalising Roman empire.

16

Conclusion and envoy

I have presented a fairly rough sketch of the changing nature of Roman presence in the Greek city in a period of a crucial transformation of the Imperium Romanum in the East. I have discussed how at the early stages Roman negotiatores settled in Greek cities in the slipstream of Roman diplomatic moves and of the army. Initially they seem to have settled as individual expats, who show considerable sign of adaptation and acculturation to their new environments. I have shown how the Greek cities responded, granting these newcomers a kind of collective status, that found expression i.a. in their collective participation in growing numbers of community
21

IGR cf Herrmann,Peter.1968.DerrmischeKaisereid.

UntersuchungenzuseinerHerkunftundEntwicklung.Hypomnemata; untersuchungenzurAntikeundzuihremNachleben,Heft20. Gttingen:Vandenhoecku.Ruprecht.

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 rituals, and in particular public banquets, with which the cities celebrated their collective identity. And I have argued how in the imperial period Roman identity formed the basis of increasingly formally structured associations that seem to have acquired a fixed place in the social and political hierarchy of the city. In this context it turned out that the association of Romans began to play the role as a kind of symbolic or ideological intermediaries. They had a key role in the spread of the imperial cult and in the representation of Roman imperial power in the city. There is one final stage of this history that I have not discussed as yet: how did it finish? When I started my research for this paper. I was mainly interested in the role of the formal associations of Romans in Greek cities, and that story is fairly straightforward. The associations of Romans are widely attested in the first two centuries AD, but when the Constitutio Antoniniana extends Roman citizenship to all the free inhabitants there is no need for associations of Roman citizens - and they disappear from the record: after 212 there are no associations of Romaioi attested - as every Greek was now a Roman A Romaios too, and that identity would only become more important But when we think of Roman identity, the story does not end, quite yet. The history of the Greek city of the imperial period, which coincides with the cultural movement that we call the Second Sophistic. This is was a Greek cultural phenomenon of course, that affected elite culture and civic identity to a high degree. But it can also be seen to make room for a specifically Greek interpretation of Roman identity. Throughout the Greek East, Greek culture was used to give expression to a personal and political identity that was both Greek and Roman, or even primarily Roman.22 I am cutting corners here, and will probablt seem to deril to many of you, but this development culminates in the well-known phenomenon that the Greeks of the Byzantine empire were able to present themselves as the Romaioi - the true and only Romans. This Greek notion of Roman-ness - Romaiosyne- remained relevant in the Greek world well into the twentieth century, but that is another story.

17

Bibliography
Bayly, C. A. (2002). 'Archaic' and 'modern' globalization in the Eurasian and African arena. c. 1750-1850. Globalization in world history. A. G. Hopkins. London, Pimlico: 46-73. Bayly, C. A. (2004). The Birth of the Modern World. Global Connections and Comparisons. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing. Errington, R. M. (1988). Aspects of Roman acculturation in the East under the Republic. Alte geschichte und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Festschrift fr K. Christ zum 65. Geburtstag. P. K. a. V. Losemann. Darmstadt: 140-157. Ferrary, J.-L. (2001). Rome et la gographie de l'hellnisme: rflexions sur les "hellnes" et "panhellnnes" dans les inscriptions d'poque romaine. The Greek East in Roman context. Proceedings of a colloquium organised by the Finnish Institute at Athens, May 21-and 22 , 1999. O. Salomies. Helsinki, Finnish Institute at Athens: 19-36.

22

I argue this more fully in a forthcoming paper.

OVN Staying Roman- Becoming Greek 06-01-2010 Robert, L. (1978). "Catalogue agonistique des Rmaia de Xanthos." Revue Archologique: 277-290 [= OMS VII, no 176]. van Nijf, O. (1999). "Athletics, festivals and Greek identity in the Roman East." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 175-200. van Nijf, O. M. (2006). Global players: Athletes and performers in the Hellenistic and Roman World. Between Cult and Society. The cosmopolitan centres of the ancient Mediterranean as setting for activities of religious associations and religious communities (Special Issue of Hephaistos,Kritische Zeitschrift zu Theorie und Praxis der Arcologie und angrenzender Gebiete). I. Nielsen. Hamburg. van Nijf, O. M. (2006). "Global players: Griekse atleten, artiesten en de oikoumene in de Romeinse keizertijd." Leidschrift.

18