A TERM PAPER ON "International Monetary System" Submitted By DARSHANKUMAR GARAG (1PI11MBA46) Under the Guidance of Prof Srinivas

PES Institute of Technology 100 Feet Ring Road, BSK III Stage, Bangalore-560085.

Page 1

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY SYSTEM

Financial markets are getting more and more integrated in recent years due to globalization and people and corporates are entering into more and more cross-boarder financial deals and international trade. In order to make these transactions feasible, a system for determination of the amount and method of payment of underlying financial flows is needed. Since the domestic currencies of the parties involved will be different, the flows will take place in some mutually acceptable currencies. The set of rules, regulations, institutions, procedures, practices, and mechanisms which determine the exchange rate between currencies and the movements in exchange rate over a period is called the international monetary system. Thus, it is the institutional framework within which international payments are made, exchange rates among currencies are determined, international trade and capital flows are accommodated, and balanceof-payments adjustments made. International monetary system forms the backbone of all cross-border transactions because it makes the settlement of international payments possible. A well-functioning monetary system will facilitate international trade and investment and smooth adaptation to change.

Alternative Exchange Rate Systems (Exchange Rate Regimes)

An exchange rate is the price of one currency in terms of another currency. As in the case of any other goods, the price of a currency is affected by supply and demand. As demand for a currency increases (or supply decreases) its price will rise. This is referred as an appreciation. Conversely, as demand for a currency decreases, or supply increases, its value will depreciate. The prospect of large and rapid swings in exchange rates introduces uncertainty into the business environment. A well-functioning international monetary system ensures stability in the exchange rates. The central element of the international monetary system involves the arrangements by which exchange rates are set. The purpose of an exchange-rate system is to facilitate and promote international trade and finance. There have been three major exchange rate regimes from a historical perspective fixed, floating, and managed exchange rates. Fixed Exchange Rate System A fixed (or pegged) exchange rate system is one where governments or central banks set official exchange rates and defend the set rates through foreign exchange market intervention and monetary polices. Under this system, the currency is pegged to another currency (or basket of currencies) and the central bank promises to exchange currency at a specified rate against the other currency. Each central bank actively buys or sells its currency in foreign exchange market whenever its exchange rate threatens to deviate from its stated par value by more than an agreed-upon percentage.

Page 2

For example, Bahrain pegs its dinar to the U.S. dollar at a rate of 0.40 dinar per dollar. The Bahrain central bank must always be willing to buy dinar with dollars or to buy dollars with dinar in any amount at the fixed rate of 0.40 dinar per dollar. Otherwise, there could be excess supply of or demand for dinar, and its value would depreciate or appreciate to restore equilibrium. For example, if there were excess demand for dinar, the dinar would become more valuable relative to the dollar, and the number of dinar to buy a dollar would decrease, implying an appreciation of the dinar. In order to prevent such a move in the exchange rate, the Bahrain central bank intervenes in foreign exchange markets to meet the excess demand by increasing the supply of dinar through buying dollars. Thus, while the exchange rate does not move, the dollar reserves of the central bank do change. Were these reserves to run out, the Bahrain central bank would indeed have little choice but to float the dinar (or, more precisely, watch the dinar float). In order to avoid the need to respond to all movements in the supply and demand for currency, a country may fix its currency within a band to allow some fluctuation in value. For example, from 1979 to 1998, a number of countries participated in the European Monetary System. Under this system, countries' exchange rates were fixed but allowed to fluctuate up or down by as much as 6% (widened to 15% in 1993) relative to an assigned par value. The bands allowed countries some latitude with choosing monetary policies and also were intended to reduce the risks of speculative attacks. In 2004, only one large economy-Denmark-used this type of exchange rate regime. The gold standard, the Bretton Woods system, and the European Monetary System (EMS) are historical examples of fixed exchange rate regimes, although they differ in specific aspects. The key features of the fixed exchange rate system are: Domestic currency is pegged to an anchor currency. Prices and interest rates have to be in line with the anchor currency, which ensures monetary discipline. Central bank has responsibility to defend exchange rate by foreign exchange market intervention. Central bank has to maintain adequate international reserves to intervene in the foreign exchange market.

Page 3

The various forms of fixed exchange rate system are as follows: 1. Conventional Fixed Peg Arrangement: In this system, a country pegs its currency at a fixed rate to a major currency or a basket of currencies with a band of variation not exceeding plus or minus 1% around the central rate. 2. Currency Board System: Under the currency board system a country pegs its currency with another major currency and fixes the rate of its domestic currency in terms of that foreign currency. Its exchange rate in terms of other currencies depends on the exchange rates between the domestic currency and the currency to which it is pegged. . The monetary policies and the economic variables are kept in line with that of the reference country by the central monetary authority, called the currency board. The currency board maintains reserves of the anchor currency up to 100% or more of the domestic currency in circulation. This means that a unit of domestic currency cannot be introduced into the economy without an additional unit of foreign exchange reserves being obtained first. Currency board commits to convert its domestic currency on demand into the anchor foreign currency to an unlimited extent, at the fixed exchange rate. Thus, a currency board has three important components: the establishment of a fixed exchange rate, the requirement that central bank reserves cover 100% of the monetary base at that exchange rate, and the obligation that the central bank meets all demand for anchor currency. As such, a currency board imposes discipline on governments by prohibiting increases in money supply beyond the level of reserves. It also prohibits the central bank from extending credit to commercial banks and rules out a role as lender of last resort. Clearly, a currency board does not make a country immune to speculative attack. But it provides a more credible guarantee of a country's commitment to a fixed exchange rate by limiting the ability of traders to launch speculative attacks against the local currency. 3. Crawling Pegs: Another variation on a fixed exchange rate regime is the crawling peg or crawling band. Under a crawling peg, the central bank adjusts the value of its currency periodically in small amounts at a fixed, preannounced rate or in response to changes in specific indicators. 4. Target Zone Arrangement: A group of countries agree to maintain the exchange rate between the currencies within the certain band around fixed central exchange rates. The system is called the target zone arrangement in which convergence of economic policies of the participating countries are a prerequisite for this system.

Page 4

5. Monetary Union: Under this system the member nations of monetary unions agree to use a common currency, instead of their individual currencies. This wipes out the fluctuations of exchange rates and the attendant inefficiencies completely. A common central bank of member countries is set up, which has the sole authority to issue currency and to determine the monetary policy of the group as a whole. The central bank has the power to alter economic variables of member nations to maintain the same inflation rate in all the member nations. European monetary union is an example of a monetary union. It has its own common currency (Euro) and has a common central bank. The ability of the central bank to defend its currency under a fixed exchange rate regime is limited by its stock of foreign exchange reserves and by its ability to raise interest rates. If there is persistent excess demand for anchor currency, the central bank must sell anchor currency, and its reserves therefore fall. If the central bank's reserves run low and it is unable to secure financing from private markets, it may have to devalue the exchange rate. Likewise, countries may be unable to increase interest rates to the levels necessary to defend their national currency, maybe because unemployment is too high already or the public debt is becoming unsustainable. Advantages of a fixed exchange rate regime It leads to orderly foreign exchange market. Fixed exchange rates require countries to adopt restrictive monetary and fiscal policies that foster an anti-inflationary environment. Thus it ensures monetary and fiscal discipline on the domestic economy. Fixed exchange rate regimes promote institutional credibility by signaling monetary discipline. It promotes international trade by providing stability in international prices and reducing the cost of trading.

Disadvantages of fixed exchange rate regime Loss of monetary independence: Central bank cannot use money supply as a tool to stimulate the economy. The central bank would also be unable to respond to unemployment through lowering the interest rate to stimulate investment because of concerns about the effect on the exchange rate. Burden to keep adequate reserves. It is subject to destabilizing speculative attacks. Example, speculative attacks on British pound in 1992, on east Asian currencies in 1997 and Argentinean peso in 2001. Page 5

Danger of sudden collapse of system and financial and economic instability. Fixed rates may be maintained at rates that are inconsistent with economic fundamentals, thereby exacerbating periods of recession.

Floating or Flexible Exchange Rate System A floating or flexible exchange rate system is one in which the exchange rate between currencies is determined purely by supply and demand of the currencies without any government invention. The rates depend on the flow of money between the countries, which may either result due to international trade in goods or services, or due to purely financial flows. Hence in case of a deficit or surplus in the balance of payment, the exchange rates get automatically adjusted and this leads to a correction of the imbalance. In a floating exchange rate system, economic parameters like price level changes, interest differentials, economic growth and government policies have an impact on the exchange rate as these factors influence the supply and demand of currencies. A purely floating exchange rate system is more of a theoretical benchmark rather than reality in practice. Most economies fall in between the two extremes a rigidly fixed system and a purely floating system. The United States, the EU, and Japan are close to the flexible exchange rate system, although central banks of these countries intervene in the foreign exchange market from time to time. Key features of a floating exchange rate system are: No government intervention required. Exchange rate determined by market forces. Frequent fluctuations. Balance of payments adjusts simultaneously with the exchange rate.

Floating exchange rates can be of two types: Free float and Managed float

Page 6

Free float: Under the free float, market exchange rates are determined by the interaction of currencies' supply and demand. The supply and demand schedules, in turn, are influenced by price level changes, interest differentials and economic growth. As these economic parameters change, market participants will adjust their current and expected future currency needs. There is no intervention either by the government or by the central bank. Managed float: In the free float, there is always an uncertainty in exchange rate movements that reduce economic efficiency by acting as a tax on trade and foreign investments. In order to reduce the volatility associated with the free float, the central bank generally intervenes in the currency markets to smoothen the fluctuations. Such a system of managed exchange rates is referred to as a managed float or a dirty float. There are three approaches to manage the float: 1. Smoothing out daily fluctuations: The central bank may occasionally enter the market on the buy or sell side to ease the transition from one rate to another, rather than resist fundamental market forces, tending to bring about long-term currency appreciation or depreciation. 2. Leaning against wind: This approach is an intermediate policy designed to moderate an abrupt short and medium-term fluctuations brought about by random events whose effects are expected to be only temporary. Intervention may take place to prevent these short and medium-term effects, while letting the markets find their own equilibrium rates in the long-term, in accordance with the fundamentals. 3. Unofficial pegging: In the third variation, though officially the exchange rate may be floating, in reality the central bank may intervene regularly in the currency market, thus unofficially keeping it fixed. Advantages of Floating Exchange Rate System Since the country is not required to defend the exchange rate at a certain level, the government and central bank are free to choose independent domestic macroeconomic policies to deal with domestic issues such as inflation or unemployment. Under floating exchange rate regime, market intervention by the central bank is not required to defend the exchange rate. Since there is no need for market intervention, there is only very low requirement for international reserves. For countries that lack monetary and fiscal disciplines, a floating exchange rate sets no pressure for a country to observe these disciplines. Page 7

Disadvantages of Floating Exchange Rate System Floating exchange rate system is susceptible to large swings in the exchange rate causing substantial swings in the real economy, especially in the case of small emerging market economies where exports, imports, and international capital flows make up a relatively large share of the economy. Floating exchange rate system provides uncertainty and exchange rate risk in international trade and investment. Although exchange rate risk could be hedged under a floating exchange rate regime, such hedges could be expensive. Since the volatility in exchange rate is higher under floating exchange rate system, any depreciation of the domestic currency may disrupt the financial system, especially in the case of a country where banks make significant loans in foreign currency.

Managed Exchange Rate System A managed-exchange-rate system is a hybrid of fixed and flexible rates in which governments attempt to affect their exchange rates directly by buying or selling foreign currencies or indirectly, through monetary policy, by raising or lowering interest rates. Other Exchange Rate Regimes There have been other arrangements that are variations of the one of the three regimes. Each of these exchange rate regimes has its own characteristics which may be classified in the following dimensions: the role of the government, how the exchange rate is determined, and how a balance of payments imbalance is adjusted. For example, under a purely floating exchange rate system, the central bank does not intervene in the foreign exchange market; the exchange rate is determined purely by market forces; the balance of payments and the exchange rates adjust simultaneously to equilibrium. Convertibility of currency In addition to exchange rate policy (what type of exchange rate regime to adopt), a country also has to decides whether to allow free convertibility of its currency to other currencies. Based on the two major parts of the balance of payments, convertibility can be applied to either account alone or both. Current account convertibility means that foreign exchange can be freely bought and sold provided its use is associated with international trade in goods and services. But there are still restrictions when the intended use of the foreign exchange is to purchase foreign financial assets or to make equity investments. Free trade in currencies for the latter purpose is called capital account convertibility. If convertibility is allowed for transactions in both the current and the capital accounts, we say there is full convertibility. Full convertibility is equivalent to free capital mobility. Restrictions on convertibility are referred to as foreign exchange control. Page 8

A Brief History of the International Monetary System The international monetary system went through several distinct stages of evolution in the past. These stages can be summarized as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Bimetallism: Before 1875 Classical Gold Standard: 1875-1914 The Gold-Exchange Standard: Inter-war period 1915-1944 Bretton Woods System: 1945-1972 Flexible Exchange Rate Regime: Since 1973.

These five stages are briefly examined in the following sections. Bimetallism Prior to 1870 many countries had bimetallism, that is, a double standard in that free coinage was maintained for both gold and silver. The international monetary system before 1870s can be characterized as bimetallism in the sense that both gold and silver were used as international means of payment and that the exchange rates among currencies were determined by either their gold or silver contents. Gold Standard The gold standard, which is a fixed exchange rate system, in its classical form, was followed from 1875 to 1914. Under the gold standard, all major countries set values for their currencies in terms of gold and agreed to buy and sell gold on demand with any other country at that rate. As such, all exchange rates were fixed against one another. For example, the United States agreed to buy and sell gold for $20.67 per ounce, while Britain set the rate at 4.2474 pounds per ounce. The dollar-pound exchange rate was therefore fixed at 4.8665 dollars per pound. If the exchange rate veered from this value to, say, 5 dollars per pound, gold traders could buy gold in the United States for $20.67 and sell it in London for $21.237. With excess demand for U.S. gold, the exchange rate would quickly be pushed back to 4.8665 dollars per pound. In order to fix their exchange rates in this way, countries had to maintain adequate gold reserves. Some of the characteristics of the gold standard include the gold contents of currencies, money supply being determined by a countrys gold stock, and automatic adjustment of the balance of payments and prices (and the entire economy) or no requirement of government intervention.

Page 9

The main advantages of the gold standard were its monetary discipline and symmetric monetary adjustment. There was monetary discipline because central banks throughout the world were obliged to fix the money price of gold. They could not allow their money supplies to grow more rapidly than real money demand, since such rapid monetary growth eventually raises the money prices of all goods and services, including gold. Symmetric monetary adjustment refers to the fact that no country in the system occupied a privileged position by being relieved of the commitment to intervene (or to defend the value of its currency). Countries shared equally in the cost or burden (relative prices changes, unemployment or recession) of balance of payments adjustment. The gold standard had a number of drawbacks as well. Since the money supply was tied up to the stock of gold in a country, there were constraints on the use of monetary policy to fight unemployment. In a worldwide recession, it might be desirable for all countries to expand their money supplies jointly even if this were to raise the price of gold in terms of national currencies. But they could not do that if they were to keep the gold standard. A second drawback was a reserve shortage. As the economy grew, more money would be needed to facilitate the increasing economic transactions. But limits in gold supply might not keep up with economic growth and therefore would hinder economic growth. Another drawback of the gold standard was the asymmetric distribution of gold production and stock. The gold standard could give countries with potentially large gold production considerable ability to influence macroeconomic conditions throughout the world through market sales of gold. Failure of Gold Standard The gold standard was suspended with the outbreak of World War I, which interrupted trade flows, restricted the free movement of gold, and resulted in high inflation for many countries. The outbreak of World War I was a direct cause for the collapse of the gold standard. Governments abandoned the gold standard during the war and financed part of their massive military expenditures by printing money without the backing of gold. Further, labor forces and productive capacity had been reduced sharply through war losses. As a result, price levels were higher everywhere at the war's conclusion in 1918. The loss of confidence in the British pound as a reserve currency was another reason. A reserve currency is one that the central banks hold in their international reserves, and under a fixed exchange regime, each nations central bank fixes its currencys exchange rate against the reserve currency by standing ready to trade domestic money for reserve assets at that rate. Under gold standard, the British pound was the reserve currency and was regarded as good as gold. The U.K. deficits in its balance of payments made other countries worry about the U.K.s inability to convert s into gold.

Page 10

During the inter-war years (1918-1939), several countries returned briefly to gold standard. But as the great depression continued, many countries renounced their gold standard obligations and allowed their currencies to float in the foreign exchange market. Inflation was rampant in some economies at the end of WWI. The loss of confidence in the U.K., the existence of multiple reserve currencies (, $, French franc) and the hyperinflation in Germany all contributed to the failure to restore the gold standard. Multiple attempts in the following years to revive the gold standard failed. The Gold-Exchange Standard After the gold standard broke down during the World War I, it was briefly reinstated from 1925 to 1931 as the Gold exchange Standard. Under this standard, the United States and England could only hold gold reserves, but other nations could hold both gold and dollars or pounds as reserves. In 1931, England departed from gold in the face of massive gold and capital flows, owing to an unrealistic exchange rate, leading to the failure of the gold exchange standard. The Bretton Woods System of Exchange Rates In 1944 the major Allied trading nations met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to lay the basis for the post-World War II payments and trading system. In addition to designing the framework for a new international monetary system, they created two international institutions - the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) and the International Monetary Fund. Since the participating officials believed that the inter-war Great Depression had been aggravated by the instability of exchange rates and restrictions on currency convertibility, representatives to the Bretton Woods meetings concluded that the post-War system should be governed by fixed exchange rates. Following the perceived success of the classical gold standard prior to 1914, the new system was to include a link to gold. However, in 1944 about 70 percent of the world's monetary gold was in the hands of the United States. Thus, there emerged a system that has been called the "gold exchange standard." Under the Bretton Woods gold exchange standard, the United States committed itself to buy gold from, or sell gold to, any participating country's official monetary institution for $35 per ounce. But - in contrast to the classical gold standard - the United States undertook no commitment to transact in gold with private parties, whether they were U.S. citizens or foreign citizens. The other participating countries agreed to constrain the value of their currencies within plus or minus one percent of an announced "par rate" with the U.S. dollar. A country was only allowed to change this par rate (devalue or revalue) in response to a "fundamental disequilibrium" in its balance of payments. The system was to be overseen by the International Monetary Fund, which had the capacity to lend, in limited amounts, currencies to countries in temporary need, and which was supposed to be consulted about any proposed changes in par values.

Page 11

Under the Bretton Woods arrangements, a country was obligated to intervene in the foreign exchange market if its exchange rate began to move outside the one percent band around its announced par value with the dollar. If, for example, the German mark began to fall in value and approach its one percent limit from the par value, the German central bank would buy marks in the foreign exchange markets. It would generally use dollars for such an intervention, although it was free to use any currency. If it needed dollars to sell for marks, it could sell gold from its reserves to the United States, which was obligated to buy them for dollars. It could then use those dollars to support the mark. On the other hand, if the mark were to rise in value, the German central bank would be expected to sell marks in the market; generally, it would acquire dollars in exchange, which it could hold in reserve (and earn interest, if it invested them, in US Treasury securities, for example) for future intervention, or it could sell them to the United States in exchange for gold. Since a major goal of the participants in the Bretton Woods meetings was expansion of international trade, member countries were encouraged to make their currencies freely convertible for trade-related (or current account) transactions. Most Western European countries achieved this goal in 1958, and Japan followed in the early 1960s. Most countries maintained some kind of controls over capital account transactions for a number of years. Until October 1979, for example, a British citizen could not use his or her pounds to buy dollars for capital transactions (say to buy foreign stocks) without the permission of the British government. The United States, however, did not impose foreign exchange controls, with the exception of a period in the late 1960's when it limited foreign direct investment by U.S. firms and imposed a tax on the purchases by Americans of bonds and equities from foreign countries. Key features of Bretton Woods System are: Reserves: Gold, U.S. $ and SDR (added in 1960s) The U.S. dollar replaced the British pound as the reserve currency and was treated as good as gold. Fixed parities Under the original provisions of the Bretton Woods agreement, all countries fixed the value of their currencies in terms of gold but were not required to exchange their currencies for gold. Only the dollar remained convertible into gold (at $35 per ounce). Therefore each country established its exchange rate vis--vis the dollar. This is often called the two-tier system: (1) US $ pegged to gold: $35/ounce of gold dollar-gold parity, and (2) other currencies pegged to dollar. For example, the British pound was fixed to the dollar at $2.80/, and Japanese yen was pegged to the dollar at 360/$.

Page 12

Adjustable parities Although each country's exchange rate was fixed, it could be changed devalued or revalued against the dollar if the IMF agreed that the country's balance of payments was in a situation of "fundamental disequilibrium." Narrow band (1% on either side of parity) The exchange rates were allowed to fluctuate within 1% of its stated par value. Other countries would buy and sell U.S. dollars to keep market exchange rates within the 1 percent band around par value foreign exchange market intervention (as required by the system). An integral part of the Bretton Woods system was the establishment of the IMF, which still administers the international monetary system and operates as a central bank for central banks. Member nations subscribe by lending their currencies to the IMF; the IMF then re-lends these funds to help countries in balance-of-payments difficulties. The main function of the IMF is to make temporary loans to countries to help them tide over difficulties with current account deficits and financial crises. Member countries are entitled to borrowing from the IMF up to a certain limit its contribution to the IMF. Beyond that limit, the IMF lending is conditional upon the borrowing countrys accepting the IMF surveillance over its policies. One of the differences between the gold standard and the Bretton Woods system is that, while both are fixed exchange rate systems, the Bretton Woods system allowed a member country to adjust the values of its currency, the exchange rate, when there was a fundamental problem with the countrys balance of payments. Failure of Bretton Wood System With its currency as the sole reserve currency, the United States was in a unique position in the Bretton Woods system. Its money supply, unlike other countries, was not tied up to defend the exchange rate system. The expansionary policy in the United States in the 1960s led to higher inflation in the U.S. than in Japan and West Germany. The U.S. balance of payments suffered increasing deficits. In the meantime, Japan and West Germany became increasingly competitive in the world market and their currencies were under pressure to revalue. While the United States called on Japan and West Germany to revalue their currencies, Japan and West Germany called upon the United States to control its government spending and inflation. From purchasing power parity, we know that when the exchange rates are fixed, inflation rates for countries under the fixed exchange rate system have to be the same. That is, countries have to coordinate their macroeconomic policies. But policy coordination is often difficult due to issues of sovereignty.

Page 13

The coordination failures among the large economies led to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. In August 1971, the United States suspended total convertibility of the dollar to gold. This resulted in no parity between currencies. Most major currencies began to float against the dollar. Attempts to re-adopt the fixed rate system failed by 1973 (coupled with first oil shock). . By early 1973, the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates was abandoned altogether. Countries eventually accepted what is now the current exchange rate system a hybrid of different exchange rate regimes. The biggest advantage of the Bretton Woods regime was that it provided a stable exchange rate environment that nurtured the reconstruction of the world economy and the growth of international trade and finance. The main disadvantage was that it required coordination of policies among member countries. European Monetary System After the break down of the Bretton Woods system in 1973, several European countries attempted various mechanisms to fix their exchange rates to each other. While allowing their currencies to float against the dollar, these European countries tried progressively to narrow the extent to which they let their currencies fluctuate against each other. Six members of the European Economic Community (EEC), including France and Germany, jointly floated their currencies against the dollar. The currencies of the participating countries were allowed to fluctuate in a narrow band with respect to each other (1.125% on either side of the parity exchange rate), and the permissible joint float against other currencies was also limited (to 2.5% on either side of the parity). This fixed exchange rate system that arose concurrently with the fall of the Bretton Wood System was called the snake as this gave the currency movement the look of a snake. In 1979, eight European countries created a formal system of mutually fixed exchange rates, called the European Monetary system (EMS). They fixed their exchange rates relative to each other, floating jointly against the dollar. The system was quite similar to the Bretton Wood System, with the exception that instead of the currencies being pegged to the currency of one of the participating nations, a new currency was created for the purpose. It was named the European Currency Unit (ECU) and was defined as a weighted average of the various European currencies. Each member had to fix the value of its currency in terms of the ECU. This had the effect of pegging these currencies with each other. Each currency could vary against the ECU and against other currencies within a certain band on either side of the parity rate thereby forming a parity grid. When EMS was first set up, a currency was allowed to deviate from parities with other currencies by a maximum of plus or minus 2.25%, with the exception of Italian lira, for which a maximum deviation of plus or minus 6% was allowed. In September 1993, however the band was widened to a maximum of plus or minus 15%. When a currency is at the lower or upper bound, the central bank of both countries are required to intervene in the foreign exchange markets to keep the market exchange rate within the band. To intervene in the exchange markets, the central bank can borrow from a credit fund to which member countries contribute gold and foreign reserves.

Page 14

For example, if the French franc depreciates to its lower limit relative to the DM, it is obligated to sell DM reserves to make Franc appreciate. German central bank is obligated to loan DM to France. Initially there had been capital controls that limited the ability of private citizens to trade in foreign currencies. This was to prevent speculators from starting a currency crisis. These restrictions were later relaxed in 1987. Since the EMS members were less than fully committed to coordinating their economic policies, the EMS went through a series of realignments. Despite the recurrent turbulence in the EMS, European Union members met at Maastricht (Netherlands) in December 1991 and signed the Maastricht Treaty. According to the treaty, the European Union will irrevocably fix exchange rates among the member currencies by January 1, 1999, and subsequently introduce a common European currency, replacing individual national currencies. The European Central Bank, to be located in Frankfurt, Germany, will be solely responsible for the issuance of common currency and conducting monetary policy in the European Union. To pave the way for the European Monetary Union (EMU), the member countries of the European Union agreed to closely coordinate their fiscal, monetary, and exchange rate policies and a achieve a convergence of their economies. European Monetary Union On January 1 2002, 12 European countries finalized their monetary union. This meant that they had a common central bank in Frankfurt in Germany, at which all 12 countries had to agree on a common monetary policy. Eleven European countries adopted a common currency called the euro, voluntarily giving up their monetary sovereignty. With the launching of the euro on January 1, 1999, the European Monetary Union (EMU) was created. The EMU is a logical extension of the EMS, and the European Currency Unit (ECU) was the precursor of the euro. As the euro was introduced, each national currency of the euro-11 countries was irrevocably fixed to the euro at a conversion rate as of January 1, 1999. National currencies such as the French franc, German mark, and Italian lira are no longer independent currencies. Rather, they are just different denominations of the same currency, the euro. Once the changeover is completed the legaltender status of national currencies will be canceled, leaving the euro as the sole legal tender in the euro countries. Monetary policy for the euro countries will be conducted by the European Central Bank (ECB) headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany, whose primary objective is to maintain price stability. The independence of the ECB is legally guaranteed so that in conducting its monetary policy, it will not be unduly subjected to political pressure from any member countries or institutions. The national central banks of the euro countries will not disappear. Together with the European Central Bank, they form the European System of Central Banks (ESCB). The tasks of the ESCB are threefold: (1) to define and implement the common monetary policy of the Union; (2) to conduct foreign exchange operations; and (3) to hold and manage the official foreign Page 15

reserves of the euro member states. Although national central banks will have to follow the policies of the ECB, they will continue to perform important functions in their jurisdiction such as distributing credit, collecting resources, and managing payment systems. Current Exchange Rate Regimes The current exchange rate system is a hybrid of many different arrangements. The International Monetary Fund classifies these exchange rate regimes into eight specific categories. The eight categories span the spectrum of exchange rate regimes from rigidly fixed to independently floating: 1. Exchange Arrangements with No Separate Legal Tender: The currency of another country circulates as the sole legal tender or the member belongs to a monetary or currency union in which the same legal tender is shared by the members of the union. 2. Currency Board Arrangements: A monetary regime based on an implicit legislative commitment to exchange domestic currency for a specified foreign currency at a fixed exchange rate, combined with restrictions on the issuing authority to ensure the fulfillment of its legal obligation. 3. Other Conventional Fixed Peg Arrangements: The country pegs its currency at a fixed rate to a major currency or a basket of currencies , where the exchange rate fluctuates within a narrow margin or at most 1% around a central rate. 4. Pegged Exchange Rates within Horizontal Bands: The value of the currency is maintained within margins of fluctuation around a formal fixed peg that are wider than 1% around a central rate. 5. Crawling Pegs: The currency is adjusted periodically in small amounts at a fixed, pre-announced rate or in response to changes in selective quantitative indicators. 6. Exchange Rates within Crawling Pegs: The currency is maintained within certain fluctuation margins around a central rate that is adjusted periodically at a fixed preannounced rate or in response to change in selective quantitative indicators. 7. Managed Floating with No Pre-Announced Path for the Exchange Rate: The monetary authority influences the movements of the exchange rate through active intervention in the foreign exchange market without specifying or pre-committing to a pre-announced path for the exchange rate. 8. Independent Floating: The exchange rate is market determined, with central bank intervening only to moderate the speed of change and to prevent excessive fluctuations, but not attempting to maintain it at or drive it to any particular level.

Page 16

The United States, the EU, Japan, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Canada are among the major countries that follow an independent floating policy. At the other end of the exchange rate regime spectrum (from floating to fixed) is the currency board, which is a monetary regime based on an explicit legislative commitment to exchange domestic currency for a specified foreign currency at a fixed rate, combined with restrictions on the issuing authority to ensure the fulfillment of its legal obligation. Argentina was an example before the system failed in 2002. Currently, Hong Kong is a well known example of such an arrangement.

Page 17

Conclusion
The International monetary system has evolved from the days of the gold standard to todays eclectic currency arrangement Gold Standard (1876 1913) Inter-war period (1914 1944) Bretton Woods (1944) Elimination of dollar convertibility into gold (1971) Exchange rates began to float Eurocurrencies are domestic currencies of one country on deposit in a second country If the ideal currency existed in todays world, it would have three attributes: a fixed value, convertibility, and independent monetary policy Emerging market countries must often choose between two extreme exchange rate regimes, either free-floating or fixed regime such as a currency board or dollarization The 15 members of the EU are also members of the EMS. Twelve members of this group have formed an island of fixed exchange rates amongst themselves in a sea of floating currencies They rely heavily on trade among themselves, so day-to-day benefits are great May 1, 2004 the European Union admitted 10 more countries The euro affects markets in three ways Countries within the zone enjoy cheaper transaction costs Currency risks and costs related to exchange rate uncertainty are reduced, All consumers and businesses, both inside and outside of the euro zone enjoy price transparency and increased price-based competition

Page 18