You are on page 1of 15

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 1 of 15

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

User Account
Register Login

Main navigation
Economists' ClubExclusive commentaries and debate featuring the world's leading economic thinkers. Mind, Matter & PoliticsExclusive cutting-edge commentaries on science, philosophy, and global affairs. Topics Focal Points Focal Points Asia's Tipping Point? The Roubini Factor Back to Mexico's Future? Free Trade in Troubled Times Europe's Crisis Goes Global Central Banks in the Firing Line Soros on Europe The Big Bank Theory The Road to Rio+20 Would Eurobonds Work? Will India's Boom Go Bust? Austerity and its Discontents America's Precarious Recovery The Euro at Bay China's Scandalous Politics

View all Focal Points Africa Africa African Politics African Economies African Development Public Health

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 2 of 15

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Asia Asia Asian Politics Asian Economies China India Japan Korean Peninsula Southeast Asia Central Asia

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Culture and Society Culture and Society Social Changes/Social Movements Philosophy and Ethics Religion Human Rights Technology Health and Medicine Science and Society

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Economic Reflections Economic Reflections Economic Justice Economic History Economic Theory Market Economy/Capitalism

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Environment Environment Global Warming/Climate Change The Environment and the Economy

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 3 of 15

Natural Resources Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Europe Europe European Politics European Economies Eurozone EU Member States Non-EU Europe Germany France United Kingdom Russia Central Europe

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Finance Finance Financial Institutions Banking Central Banking Monetary Policy Financial Regulation

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Growth and Development Growth and Development Fiscal Policy Development Strategies Regulatory Policy Corporate Governance Trade

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

International Economics International Economics

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 4 of 15

International Financial Institutions US Economy European Economies Asian Economies Developing World

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

International Institutions International Institutions G-7, G-8, G-20 IMF/World Bank UN EU NATO International Justice Others

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

International Relations International Relations US Foreign Policy European Affairs Asian Affairs Military Affairs Diplomacy

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Latin America Latin America Latin American Politics Latin American Economies Brazil Argentina Mexico

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Middle East

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 5 of 15

Middle East Israel/Palestine Egypt Turkey Iran Iraq Islam

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

Politics Politics US Politics European Politics Asian Politics Human Rights Women's Issues Democratic Transitions Constitutional Government

Most recent commentaries on this topic


type to search live in this topic

United States United States US Politics US Economy US Foreign Policy Most recent commentaries on this topic
type to search live in this topic

Videos/ Podcasts On DeckWeb-only features and blogs. About us About Project Syndicate Submission Guidelines Contributors Member Papers Archive RSS Feeds search Facebook Twitter RSS

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 6 of 15

LinkedIn Google+ Youtube More

Featured Articles

Daniel Gros

A Banking Union Baby Step


BRUSSELS At the beginning of the financial crisis, it was said that banks were, in Charles Goodharts crisp phrase, international in life

Javier Solana

The Egyptian Crucible


MADRID As Egyptians tensely awaited the results of their countrys presidential elections, a thread of pessimism ran through the discourse

Mark Roe

Greece and the Limits of Anti-Austerity


CAMBRIDGE Is austerity dead? At last months G-8 meeting at Camp David, the German-led austerity program for the eurozones troubled south

Christopher R. Hill

Where Are the Syrian Peacemakers?


DENVER Much has been said about the similarities between the chaos in Syria and the Balkan wars of the 1990s. But, while the prolonged ki Asian PoliticsAsian EconomiesChina Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 7 of 15

Minxin Pei
Minxin Pei is Professor of Government at Claremont McKenna College. Full profile Jul. 5, 2012Email | Print EnglishEnglish ArabicArabic ChineseChinese FrenchFrench GermanGerman SpanishSpanish

Why China Cant Adjust


Share this Select a serviceX google bookmark delicious digg Tweet
Like 10 24 88

CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphCLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA Chinas current economic slowdown has no shortage of causes: Europes financial turmoil, sputtering recovery in the United States, and weak domestic investment growth, to name the most commonly cited factors. Since exports and investment account, respectively, for 30% and 40% of Chinas GDP growth, its economy is particularly vulnerable to weakening external demand and accumulation of non-performing loans caused by excessive and wasteful spending on fixed assets.

Illustration by Paul Lachine CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphBut Chinas vulnerability to these factors, as serious as they are, is symptomatic of deeper institutional problems. Until these underlying constraints are addressed, talk of a new consumption-based growth model for China, reflected in the governments recently approved 12th FiveYear Plan, can be no more than lip service.

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 8 of 15

CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphAfter all, Chinas major trading partners, international financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and senior Chinese officials themselves have long recognized the structural vulnerabilities caused by excessive investment and low household consumption. And, for nearly a decade, China has been urged to undertake reforms to redress these economic patterns, which have undermined the welfare of ordinary Chinese and strained the global trading system. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphThe best-known feature of Chinas macroeconomic imbalances is heavy dependence on exports for growth, which is typically attributed to weak domestic demand: as a middle-income country, China lacks the purchasing power to consume the goods that it produces. With nearly unlimited access to advanced-country markets, China can tap into global external demand and raise its GDP growth potential, as it has done for the past two decades. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphIf this view is right, the solution is straightforward: China can correct its imbalances by increasing its citizens incomes (by cutting taxes, raising wages, or increasing social spending), so that they can consume more, thereby reducing the economys dependence on exports. Indeed, nearly all mainstream economists prescribe this approach for China. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphBut there is another explanation for Chinas excessive export dependence, one that has more to do with the countrys poor political and economic institutions. Specifically, export dependence partly reflects the high degree of difficulty of doing business in China. Official corruption, insecure property rights, stifling regulatory restraints, weak payment discipline, poor logistics and distribution, widespread counterfeiting, and vulnerability to other forms of intellectual-property theft: all of these obstacles increase transaction costs and make it difficult for entrepreneurs to thrive in domestic markets. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphBy contrast, if Chinas private firms sell to Western multinationals, such as Wal-Mart, Target, or Home Depot, they do not have to worry about getting paid. They can avoid all of the headaches that they would have encountered at home, because well-established economic institutions and business practices in their export markets protect their interests and greatly reduce transaction costs. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphThe Chinese economys institutional weakness is reflected in international survey data. The World Bank publishes an annual review of the ease of doing business for 183 countries and sub-national units. In its June 2011 survey, China was ranked 91st, behind Mongolia, Albania, and Belarus. It is particularly difficult to start a business in China (151st), pay taxes (122nd), obtain construction permits (179th), and get electricity (115th). CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphFaced with such a hostile environment, Chinese private entrepreneurs have been forced to engage in institutional arbitrage taking advantage of efficient Western economic institutions to expand their business (most export-oriented businesses are owned by private entrepreneurs and foreign firms). CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphUnfortunately, as China has already claimed a large share of the worlds merchandise exports (10.4% in 2010) and economic stagnation in the West is constraining external demand, this strategy can no longer work. But reorienting their businesses toward the Chinese domestic market requires far more than government policies that put more money in consumers' pockets. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphIn order to enjoy the same low transaction costs that they have in exporting, Chinas entrepreneurs need a much better business environment: an effective legal system, a sound regulatory framework, a government that protects their brands by fighting intellectual-property theft, dependable logistics and distribution networks, and a graft-resistant bureaucracy. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphChina cannot create such an environment quickly. In essence, the Chinese government must transform a predatory state into a nurturing one, and treat private

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 9 of 15

entrepreneurs as creators of wealth rather than targets of extraction. In nearly all other countries, such a transformation was accomplished by establishing the rule of law and/or moving from autocracy to democracy. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphThe impossibility of sustaining growth in the absence of the rule of law and political accountability presents the Chinese Communist Party with an existential dilemma. Ever since it crushed the pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square in 1989, the party has vowed not to surrender its political monopoly. The investment boom and the globalization dividend of the last two decades allowed the Party to have its cake and eat it maintaining its rule on the basis of economic prosperity, while failing to establish the institutions critical to sustaining such prosperity. Today, this is no longer possible. CommentsView/Create comment on this paragraphSo in a sense, the Chinese bubble as much an intellectual and political bubble as an economic one has burst. As Chinas economic deceleration exposes its structural vulnerabilities and flawed policies, the much-hyped notion of Chinese exceptionalism that China can continue to grow without the rule of law and the other essential institutions that a modern market economy presupposes is proving to be nothing but a delusion. Reprinting material from this Web site without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact us. Share this Select a serviceX google bookmark delicious digg Tweet
Like 10 24 88

Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space

New comment Filter Explain this

Comments (3)
You need to login in order to leave a comment. If you do not yet have an account, please register. 1. Commented

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 10 of 15

Daniel Gomes 1 week ago


China's economic model is its last strides due to many different reasons: 1. Energy costs: For a low cost export based economy all production and transportation costs are critical. Take energy costs for example, besides the amounts required to keep factories running, the amount required dor transportation of goods all the way to europe and U.S is far from negligible. And as we've seen in 2008, the oil prices will sky rocket as soon as the western economies start growing again. This will give a major advantage to local production and too countries (e.g. EU members) which have learner not to rely on cheap energy. 2. Inflation and income gap: China's currency policy and lack of any kind of social protection in particular for the armies of migrant workers which keep factories running, generates a continuously widening gap between purchasing power of the masses and the general cost of living since early 2000s. The government has started to tackle this but its too little too late, over the past 10 years basic salaries in south china factories stagnated in around $300 US dollars where as a small flat costs around $200.000 US. Migrant workers are making barely enough to sustain their families in the countryside. Only a small minority of the native city dwellers is seeing some of the benefits from the China's growth, but even these are being eroded by inflation. 3. On the other hand the government is simply not able to allow the hordes of migrant workers to further increase to sustain manufacturing expansion and therefore abandoning the country side and food production, without seriously endangering food safety, and again, as we all seen in 2008 with rice and pork prices going haywire and china producers preferring to sell to other countries to maximize their profit instead of selling at government fixed prices to their own citizens, we can all see how easy it would be for basic laws of supply and demand to cause a serious uprise. 4. With an internal market with no relevant aggregate demand other than essential products plus cars and status products there is little incentive for the continuous large scale investments in china, in fact most of the manufacturing industry which could have been transferred to China has already happened and other countries like Vietnam are presenting themselves as more economical alternatives. 6. China is a demographic time bomb, in Asia due to the lack of social security (or the low coverage incipient ones like in china) the older generations depend on direct cash handouts from the younger generations and the current generation in their 30s will have to sustain 2 or even 6 elders with their own income. 2. Commented

Dennis Argall 1 week ago


While keenly awaiting the comments of others, let me offer this link: http://www.smh.com.au/national/defence-boss-uses-rare-tools-to-build-foreign-friendships-2012070621mfw.html as illustration of how human perspectives contribute to the general need of which I wrote thus: "...Construction of collaborative connections with China by the US, Japan and others including Australia, is of the utmost importance for global security. We will all do better if we shift from zero sum gaming,

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 11 of 15

make room." Hostility and pessimism, in my view, breed hostile and pessimistic outcomes. 3. Commented

Dennis Argall 1 week ago


Elsewhere http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304746604577380073854822072.html Prof Pei has spoken of China's government as a statistical outlier in its longevity among autocracies. China is also an outlier for its population size and consequent governance issues, its poverty and the historically unique rate of revolutionary change and its climb from poverty since 1978. There are problems with generalisations for the whole country. I was saying to people in the 1980s that the Chinese coastal strip contained at least four equivalents of post-war Japan, not like the 'little tigers' of Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore, but on the scale of Japan itself; same picture more dramatic now. While other parts of China are less developed. The discussion in Prof Pei's later paragraphs about problems of accountability might be put in context of the way things have gone in western economies in recent times. There has not been much on offer for China as exemplary (or successful) political or commercial conduct in the US or EU or Russia, or India in the reform era from 1978. I have argued elsewhere http://dennisargall.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/china-and-future-of-everything.html that Chinese leaders work with more freedom, plan with more freedom than currently evident in many western democratic systems or academic institutions. I am not aware of any thread of political desire in this generation (or the next, the graduates mentioned) to break up this unprecedentedly large country, apart from some elements in minority populations. If we say there are problems for the rich and productive in China in getting more deeply into the markets of less developed parts of China, compare the EU dilemma, Germany needing to sustain and build its poorer and 'less well governed' fellow EU members if it is not to lose its own wealth. Mind you, I worry about my country's 20% GDP dependence on exports http://www.tradingeconomics.com/australia/exports-of-goods-and-services-percent-of-gdp-wb-data.html ... while having more confidence in China's government to address big new issues than I have in the capacities of my own country's political system, let alone those of the US. We need to think about ourselves when doing this too-common rough-up of China. Yes, there are dinosaurs in the Chinese system, I recognise them because they are familiar locally. But there needs to be something more than this kind of statistical chartism, some more refined political examination, to really claim that China is on the verge of collapse. I am concerned not least because arguing in the United States about China in this way has for decades fed adversarial ways of thinking about China, which do nothing to lead towards positive outcomes. Feeding the kind of thinking that still imagines Reagan brought down the Soviet Union. Construction of collaborative connections with China by the US, Japan and others including Australia, is of the utmost importance for global security. We will all do better if we shift from zero sum gaming, make room.

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 12 of 15

Related Resources More on this topic


facebooktwitter

Shashi Tharoor Jul. 13, 2012

Indias Frugal Dynamism


NEW DELHI Indias sliding economy has inspired gloom and doom far and wide, but increasingly bearish sentiment is misplaced. India still o facebooktwitter

Andrew Sheng, Geng Xiao Jul. 12, 2012

The East Asian Miracle Revisited


HONG KONG Almost two decades ago, the World Bank published its landmark study The East Asian Miracle, analyzing why East Asian economies g facebooktwitter

Malcolm Fraser Jul. 11, 2012

Obamas China Card?


MELBOURNE According to the United States Federal Reserve, Americans net worth has fallen 40% since 2007, returning to its 1992 level. Pro facebooktwitter

Jagdish Bhagwati, Arvind Panagariya Jul. 8, 2012

The Bell Tolls for Indias Congress Party


NEW YORK Politics in Asias two giants, India and China, has suddenly turned very uncertain. China remains in authoritarian mode, of cours Show more

Other commentaries by this author

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 13 of 15

facebooktwitter

May 14, 2012

The Myth of Chinese Meritocracy


CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA Political scandals sometimes perform a valuable function in cleansing governments. They destroy the political career facebooktwitter

Apr. 17, 2012

The Paranoid Style in Chinese Politics


HONG KONG Henry Kissinger, who learned a thing or two about political paranoia as Richard Nixons national security adviser and Secretary Show more

Related articles
facebooktwitter

Michael Raska Jun. 6, 2012

China on the Launch Pad


SINGAPORE Behind a veil of secrecy, Chinas development of strategic and tactical missiles is well into its third generation of modernizat facebooktwitter

Jamie F. Metzl May 18, 2012

The Paradox of Chinas Reform


NEW YORK The compelling drama of former Chongqing Communist Party chief Bo Xilais ouster amid allegations of corruption and murder, and o facebooktwitter

Minxin Pei May 14, 2012

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 14 of 15

The Myth of Chinese Meritocracy


CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA Political scandals sometimes perform a valuable function in cleansing governments. They destroy the political career facebooktwitter

Minxin Pei Apr. 17, 2012

The Paranoid Style in Chinese Politics


HONG KONG Henry Kissinger, who learned a thing or two about political paranoia as Richard Nixons national security adviser and Secretary Show more

Top Project Syndicate commentaries


Most read Most commented Most shared

Most read
facebooktwitter

Joseph E. Stiglitz Jul. 3, 2012

The Euros Latest Reprieve


NEW YORK Like an inmate on death row, the euro has received another last-minute stay of execution. It will survive a little longer. The ma facebooktwitter

Mohamed A. El-Erian Jul. 2, 2012

Will Europe Be Willing but Disabled?


NEWPORT BEACH When it comes to describing Europes ever-worsening crisis, metaphors abound. For some, it is five minutes to midnight; for facebooktwitter

Norbert Walter Jul. 5, 2012

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

"Why China Cant Adjust" by Minxin Pei | Project Syndicate

Page 15 of 15

What Euro Crisis?


FRANKFURT What constitutes a crisis? Is it sustained economic decline, high and long-term unemployment, poverty, rampant inflation, a prec facebooktwitter

Raghuram Rajan Jul. 10, 2012

Is Inequality Inhibiting Growth?


CHICAGO To understand how to achieve a sustained recovery from the Great Recession, we need to understand its causes. And identifying caus Show more Contributors Archive Contact Advertising Terms & Privacy

(c) 1995-2012 Project Syndicate RSS Twitter Facebook App Store

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-china-can-t-adjust

7/17/2012

You might also like