Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
by
S.NANDAKUMAR
MASTER OF ENGINEERING
IN
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
bonafide work of Mr.S.NANDA KUMAR, who carried out the research under my
supervision. Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the work reported herein does
not form part of any other project report or dissertation on the basis of which a degree or
Dr.A.M.THIRUMURTHY Dr.E.ARUMUGAM
Professor and Head, Professor in Civil Engineering,
Department of Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering Division,
College of Engineering, Guindy Campus, College of Engineering, Guindy Campus,
Anna University, Anna University,
Chennai- 600 025. Chennai- 600 025.
iii
கி ெபாறியய க
,
க
அணா பகைலகழக
ெசைன – 600025
திடபணக
க'மானெபாறியய ம!"
ேமலாைமயய
(0 2007)
அறிைக
பதி# எ :200511828
ேபராசிய/,
கி ெபாறியய! க ,
அணா பகைலகழக,
ெசைன – 600025.
iv
ஒ" உவாகப'.ள%.
இட: ெசைன
நா. : (ெச.ந4த5மா/)
மாணவ/ ைகெயாப
v
AND MANAGEMENT
SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
Safety plays an important role in almost all the aspect of Civil Engineering. Safety
procedures in construction site are well established, but the culture of a project site and
workers attitudes often result in procedures not being followed to achieve the best safety
outcome. The importance of safety as a cost controlling measure is often overlooked by
vi
owners and contractors. As a means of reducing the risks associated with construction, safety
can significantly impact the overall cost. A dedicated commitment to safety by both the
owner and contractor helps to ensure the success of the project and can impact the bottom-
line considerably.
The questionnaire was modified based on the feedback of the pilot survey. The survey
was conducted with ninety construction companies in and around Chennai and other major
cities in Tamilnadu. Fundamental statistical analysis was made with the surveyed
questionnaire and the results were reported. A booklet of minimum safety precautions to be
followed in construction sites has been prepared based on the available codes, guidelines and
distributed to construction companies.
Place : Chennai
Date : (S.NANDAKUMAR)
Signature of the Student
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Professor, Structural Engineering Division, Anna University for his expert guidance,
Department of Civil Engineering, for his kind permission to undertake this project.
and other faculties in Structural Engineering Division for their valuable suggestions.
The author records herewith immeasurable gratitude to all his family members for
their blessings, encouragement, advice and support. The author thanks the Almighty for the
THE AUTHOR
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL 1
1.2 SAFETYIMPORTANCE OF SAFETY
IN CONSTRUCTION 1
1.3 IMPORTANCE OF SAFETY IN
CONSTRUCTION 1
1.4 NEED FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT 2
1.5 RESPONSIBILITY OF SAFETY 3
1.6 SAFETY CLAUSES IN CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS 4
1.7 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 4
1.8 SAFETY PROGRAMME 5
1.9 SAFETY POLICY 6
1.10 RESULTS OF AN ACCIDENT 7
1.11 HEINRICH’S DOMINO THEORY 8
1.12 A MODEL OF SAFETY CULTURE 9
1.13 SAFETY BEHAVIOUR 10
1.14 SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN 11
1.15 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT & POLICIES 13
1.16 THE IMPACT OF SAFETY CULTURE
ix
ON QUALITY 14
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 21
3 METHODOLOGY 29
3.1 METHODOLOGY 29
3.2 QUESTIONNAIRE STRUCTURE 30
4 RESULT ANALYSIS 32
x
5 CONCLUSION 39
5.1 CONCLUSION 39
5.2 SUGESSION FOR FUTURE WORK 40
REFERENCES 41
ANNEXURE – A 43
ANNEXURE – B 49
xi
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
The significance of the construction industry to the economic and social life of the
country is noteworthy. The industry needs much investment and involves various types of
stakeholders and participants. From the point of view of safety the conditions normally
encountered in the construction industry does not lend themselves to the degree of
control, possible in other industries where more stable conditions are generally obtained.
The construction industry is usually very large, complex, and different from other
industries. Hence it is prone to numerous health hazards.
1.2 SAFETY
The construction industry, employing the largest labour force, has accounted for about
11% of all occupational injuries and 20% deaths resulting from occupational accidents.
International Labour Organisation (ILO) has estimated that at least 60,000 fatalities occur
at construction sites around the world every year. This means that one fatal accident
occurs approximately every ten minutes in this sector. Most of these accidents are created
due to unsafe behaviour and unsafe conditions.
The construction industry has some special features which have a direct bearing
on the accident potential. In this trade the pattern of work is ever changing. The
operations and physical circumstances change constantly unlike in the factories where the
process, the method and the operations are generally repetive. Timings and schedules
vary considerably from place to place. The most important changing factor is the change
of men themselves. The inherent nature of construction jobs combined with the above
factors make this industry as one with accident risks. Safety is a critical item on all
construction projects for multiple reasons including protecting the welfare of employees,
providing a safe work environment and controlling construction costs. However, the
importance of safety as a cost controlling measure is often overlooked by owners and
contractors. As a means of reducing the risks associated with construction, safety can
significantly impact the overall cost. A dedicated commitment to safety by both the
owner and contractor helps to ensure the success of the project and can impact the
bottom-line considerably.
There are contracts of many trade involved in a construction project. Hence the
main responsibilities for safety and health are upon the principal contractor, but that each
employer is responsible for applying measures relating to workers under their own
control. The construction industry demands the attention of everyone involved. It requires
the government, trade unions, sector’s associations, developers, architects, engineers,
contractors, subcontractors and workers to play their role. All the members involved must
work together to create a safe and healthy workplace for all.
To avoid the high losses caused by injuries, contractors are required to implement
various safety procedures like fall protection, respiratory protection, confined space
entry, competent person and other programs that control the causes of injuries. If the
contractor is successful in preventing these injuries, overhead cost of insurance and
hidden costs of accidents are significantly reduced, bringing more profit to the contractor.
Hidden costs of an accident are four to ten times the actual costs of the claim and account
for items such as employee replacement costs, loss of use, increased insurance costs,
damaged product, etc. The direct cost of accidents only includes items such as doctor’s
consultation fee, ambulance, as well as medicine costs.
4
All contract documents signed by the owner and contractor contains various
safety clauses wherein the contractor is obligated to make provisions for the safety of
men and structures, and the consequences for failure to do so. The contractor is already
mandated by law to comply with state and national regulations. The owner has to demand
that the contractor document and implement the proper safety programs that will protect
employees working on the job site. Owners sometimes hesitate and feel that they are
interfering with the contractor’s way of doing business if they express concerns over
safety at a jobsite. In reality, owners have the absolute right to mandate that a good
quality safety program be an important part of the selected contractor’s culture. The
contract documents are an effective tool in conveying the owner’s safety requirements to
the contractor. In addition, there are many benefits to prequalifying a contractor by
comparing the firm’s safety record and other company statistics with the competition. A
contractor with a good safety program is often a better choice even if the initial bid
package is higher than the firm’s competitors. Poor safety compliance increases the
owner’s risks and often inflates the final costs of a completed contract, and it is the final
cost that need to be considered into this decision making process.
Safety at construction sites is covered under many legal enactments. The Building
and other Construction Workers Act, 1996 is a comprehensive piece of legislation that
provides for registration of contractors, setting up of construction labour boards,
regulation of working conditions, health and safety of construction workers etc. many
other statutes are applicable to construction sites.
establishment Act, 1962. The Contract labour Act, 1971, regulates the employment and
working conditions of contractors labour. The immigrant labour is regulated under the
Inter-State migrant Workers Act, 1971. The Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 is
applicable to all construction sites throughout the country. It makes the employer liable to
pay compensation and provide medical care to workers who meet with accident out of or
in the course of employment. Child labour and maternity is dealt with under separate
statutes.
Document
Are inspection reports filed out?
levels to achieve the objectives. The safety policy will enjoy higher credibility and get
better implemented if the safety reports reach the top management.
Generally, most companies follow established safety guidelines and policies that
meet OSHA guidelines. However, most incidents and injuries on construction sites are a
direct result of not adhering to the established safety procedures .Therefore, to ensure a
successful safety program, three conditions must exist:
• Management commitment and leadership,
• Safe working conditions, and
• Safe work habits by all employees.
Some of the risks that are caused due to accidents both to owners and to contractors
are listed below:
• Employee injuries and fatalities
• Cost and time over-run
• Damage to property
• Unidentified repairs
• Contract extensions
• Bad publicity caused by incidents
• Increased insurance costs.
8
Many of the research efforts in construction safety have been focused on safety
management. These efforts have identified a variety of ways that supervisors and
managers of construction companies can impact the safety performance on a construction
project. For instance, as early as in1931Heinrich suggested that unsafe acts are the cause
of a high percentage of accidents. His study found that 88% of all accidents were caused
by people, while10% of accidents were attributed to unsafe conditions. Heinrich is the
first to state that incidents are symptoms of a lack of management commitment to safety,
and that 98% of accidents are preventable by management.Komakiin1986 reemphasized
Heinrichs theory and suggested monitoring and providing feed back as attributes of
effective management .Komaki added that the performance of management might affect
workers performance and attitudes. Similarly, many studies have concluded that
management’s commitment is a precursor to a successful safety program.
analogous to a row of dominos in line with each other. If one fell, it automatically
knocked down all the other dominos. Neutralising any one of the first four would prevent
the fifth: the injury. Heinrich concluded that the key domino was that pertaining to unsafe
acts. This perhaps reflected his findings that approximately 80% of accidents were
triggered by unsafe acts, with the remaining 20% being caused by unsafe conditions
(known as the 80:20 rule).Heinrich concluded that unsafe acts were caused by poor
attitudes, a lack of knowledge and skill, physical unsuitability and an unsafe
environment.
PERSON
Safety climate
Internal psychological factors perceptual audit.
ORGANISATION
Safety management
systems and
objective audit JOB
Behavioural safety and
safety programs
For many years safety professionals have been aware that the majority of workplace
accidents are triggered by unsafe behaviours, and that their control is one of the keys to
successful accident prevention. However, many organisations, even those companies with
low accident rates have been frustrated by their inability to control unsafe acts.
Traditional approaches have tended to focus on raising the safety awareness of employees
through publicity campaigns, safety training or disciplinary actions in an attempt to
change both behaviour and attitudes. Although each of these approaches has its place,
they are not in themselves efficient methods for managing change in either attitudes or
unsafe behaviours.
The fact that changing behaviour leads to a change in attitudes enables management
to focus attention on these behaviours, utilising techniques of goal setting and
performance feedback, which result in significant and lasting improvements. The
combination of goal-setting and performance feedback is a powerful management tool
that has previously been used to good effect of improve a whole host of safety
performance factors. By harnessing these motivational forces, behavioural safety
approaches offer an effective alternative to traditional methods such as safety raining or
11
safety information campaigns, because they have to take into account the
interrelationships between the organisation, the job and the individual. Thus behavioural
safety initiatives meet the needs of both the individual and the organisation, while also
positively impacting on safety culture.
Over many years, regardless of the industrial sector, scientific evaluations have
typically found that implementing a behavioural safety initiative leads to: improved
levels of safety performance, significant reductions in accident rates and associated costs.
Improvements in co-operation, involvement and communication between management
and the workforce improvements in safety climate ongoing improvements to safety
management systems ownership of safety by the workforce enhanced acceptance of
responsibility for safety better understandings of the relationship between safe behaviour
and accidents. Clearly, these motivational techniques are central to the improvement of
safety culture as they impact upon behaviour, perceptions and attitudes, and on safety
management systems. Nonetheless, the degree to which they are successful is dependent
upon many factors, such as the mechanisms used to set goals, how committed people are
to reaching the goals, how confident people are in their abilities, whether or not safety
goals conflict with other goals, the methods used to deliver feedback, the prevailing
safety climate, and the current status of the safety management system.
safety management plan will vary depending on the size and complexity of the project.
Much of a plan and its documentation will be transferable from project to project. At the
planning stage of every project the principal contractor must review its safety
management systems and generic Plan components against the new project requirements
and tailor the plan to suit.
Policy documents outline, in broad terms, the commitment to measurable goals and
form the framework for the development of detailed procedures and safe work method
statements. Policies, procedures and safe work method statements help form the safety
management plan.
14
and loyalty to the organisation, resulting in greater job satisfaction, productivity and
reduced absenteeism.
1.20 BENCHMARKING
Benchmarking can be carried out against any organisation or target that is deemed
to be best in class. A full benchmarking exercise will involve not only the collection and
comparison of data, but will include fact-finding studies to unearth the reasons for
superior performance.
The following are the three types of benchmarking.
• Internal Benchmarking
• Competitive Benchmarking
• Generic Benchmarking
Transmission of knowledge
Abstraction Application
Learning
1.24 PROCESS
• Acquire the skills. People who undertake benchmarking require a small amount of
training and guidance. An experienced in-house facilitator or external consultant
will probably be required to provide technical assurance and encouragement in
making use of reference models.
The method can be applied at various levels from relatively straightforward in-
house comparisons through to industry-wide search for best practice. It comprises
four basic stages: planning, analysis, action and review.
1.24.1 Planning
• Selecting the broad business process or function to benchmark Within that
process defining the activity to be benchmarked Identifying the resources required
for the study
• Confirming the key performance measures or indicators to measure the
performance in carrying out the activity
• Documenting the existing way in which the activity is carried out
• Identifying appropriate reference models as a starting point for your assessment;
you may also find supplier intelligence information useful
1.24.2 Analysis
• Collecting information to identify the scope for improvement
• Comparing the existing process with that of appropriate reference models to
identify differences and innovations
• Agreeing targets for improvement which are expected as a result of adopting new
ways of doing things.
1.24.3 Action
• Communicating the results of the study throughout the relevant parts of the
organisation
• Planning how to achieve the improvements
• Implementing the improvement plan, monitoring progress and reviewing as
necessary.
20
1.24.4 Review
• Reviewing performance when the changes have been bedded in
• Identifying and rectifying anything which may have caused the organisation to
fall short of its target
• Communicating the results of the changes implemented to the organisation
• Considering benchmarking again to continue the improvement process.
1.25 OBJECTIVE
It is clear from the construction industries safety record that there is room for
improvement in the implementation of safety procedures and guidelines. However, no
attempts have been made to define what is really meant by management’s commitment to
construction safety and what steps must be followed to achieve an effective commitment
to safety. The problem becomes further complicated in case of small and medium level
establishment. The top level contractors are growing while the medium level contractors
are lagging behind mainly because of their quality and safety standards.
The objective of the present study is to find the construction safety factors affecting
the medium level contractors and to improve their safety performance.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Tang.S.L et.al (1997) worked out a method which will help improve construction
safety proactively by correlating the two auditing scores (quality and safety) with safety
performance. The principle objective of this work was to develop two indicators. The
first indicator is the relationship between accident rates and quality auditing scores and
the second one is the relationship between accident rates and safety auditing scores. The
indicators would be in the form of simple graphs relating accident rates with the scores
achieved in quality audit and safety audit exercises being used by local construction
contractors. Both problems inherently reflect the insufficient effort input by management
of the construction contractors.
22
Helen Lingard et.al (1998) have aimed to test the effectiveness of Behavioral
Safety Methods (BSM) by applying goal-setting and feedback interventions to specific
areas of safety performance on Hong Kong Housing Authority construction sites. Using a
within-group experimental design and with the use of a proportional rating safety
measurement instrument, data were collected on the effectiveness of BSM on Hong Kong
sites. The data were analyzed using autoregressive moving averages models, and the
results were mixed in that a significant improvement in safety performance occurred in
the housekeeping category of intervention but no improvement was observed in the
access to heights and bamboo scaffolding categories. They concluded with a goal
setting/expectancy theory model of site safety improvement has been synthesized, and the
lack of provision of an adequate safety infrastructure has been identified as a serious
impediment to improvement.
Edwin Sawacha et.al (1999) have discussed the factors influencing safety on
construction sites. The impacts of the historical, economical, psychological, technical,
procedural, organizational and the environmental issues are considered in terms of how
these factors are linked with the level of site safety. The historical factor is assessed by
the background and characteristics of the individual, such as age and experience. The
economic factor was determined by the monetary values which are associated with safety
such as, hazard pay. The psychological factor is assessed by the safety behavior of fellow
workers onsite including supervisors. The technical land procedural factors were assessed
by the provision of training and handling of safety equipment on site. The organizational
and environmental factors are assessed by the type of policy that the management adapts
to site safety. Information regarding these factors was correlated with accidents records in
a sample of 120 operatives. The top five important issues found to be associated with site
safety were: (1) management talk on safety; (2) provision of safety booklets; (3)
provision of safety equipment; (4) providing safety environment and (5) appointing a
trained safety representative onsite.
Albert W.K. Kwok. et.al (2000) outlines the results of research conducted with
Civil Engineers regarding their views and knowledge on Construction Design and
Management (CDM) regulations. The CDM regulations were introduced in the United
23
Kingdom on 31st March 1995 in compliance with European Directives. The objectives of
this regulation were to improve construction safety by enhancing co-ordination and
communication among project parties through out all stages of the construction project.
The results revealed that more than 95% of the respondents did not know about the
requirements of CDM regulations.
Christopher Auld .M. et.al (2001), have measured the impact of on-site safety
inspections on the frequency of work-related injury and death in the Alberta construction
sector. The data were disaggregated by sub industry allowing different risk levels to be
associated with different work activities. In the sample study, there was a dramatic
decrease in inspection activity, which allows us to assess the necessity for continuing
with current levels of inspection effort. It was concluded that the on-site safety
inspections have no effect on the risk of accident and injury but have a positive effect in
reducing the number of work-related fatalities.
standards would be easier to follow. It was also stated that the employer’s motivation is
required for providing a safety environment.
Evelyn Ai Lin Teo et.al (2004) proposed a policy, process, personnel and
incentive framework which may help project managers manage construction site safety.
A postal survey of contractors in Singapore was conducted by them to test the
framework. It is found that site accidents are more likely to happen when there was
inadequate company policies, unsafe practices, and poor attitudes of construction
personnel, poor management commitment and insufficient safety knowledge and training
of workers. It is recommended that project managers need to pay more attention to the
important factors identified in this study to help them enhance performance at
construction sites and reduce the frequency of accidents. The main finding of this study
was that site safety is affected by four main factors: company safety policy; construction
process; personnel management with regard to safety; and incentives. In terms of safety
policies, it recommended that project managers implement policies relating to safety
management systems.
25
Ricardo Ramírez.R et.al (2004) presented the results of the first application of a
management evaluation system for benchmarking management practices in the
construction industry. The system supports a National Benchmarking System recently
established in the Chilean Construction Industry by incorporating qualitative
management aspects in addition to quantative performance indicators. Different analyses
were made to determine trends in the industry sector by correlating the qualitative
evaluations from surveys with the performance indicators. Thirteen construction
companies participated in the initial application of the benchmarking system. A
correlation analysis carried out by them and found that safety performance was strongly
related to companies having superior planning and control, quality management, cost
control and subcontractor management policies.
John A. Gambatese. et.al (2005) presented a pilot study that was conducted to
investigate the practice of addressing construction worker safety when designing a
project and to determine the feasibility and practicality of such an intervention. It was
found through interviews with architects and engineers that a large percentage of design
professionals are interested and willing to implement the concept in practice. They
26
described the key changes needed for implementation of the concept in practice which
include: a change in designer mindset toward safety; establishment of a motivational
force to promote designing for safety; increase designer knowledge of the concept;
incorporate construction safety knowledge in the design phase; utilize designers
knowledgeable about design-for-safety modifications; make design for safety tools and
guidelines available for use and reference; and mitigate designer liability exposure
equipment damage, combined with the associated financial loss resulting from schedule
disruptions, insurance hikes, and workers compensation, impact the profitability of any
construction operation. They have concluded that these costs may be minimized or
avoided through focused safety efforts on construction job sites.
Xinyu Huang et.al (2006) described the owner’s role in construction safety. They
were claiming that the recent improvements in construction industry were due to the
concerted efforts of owners, contractors, subcontractors, and designers. While past safety
studies have investigated the roles of contractors, subcontractors, and designers, the
owner’s impact on construction safety has not been previously investigated. Data were
obtained by conducting interviews on large construction projects. The relationship
between project safety performance and the owner’s influence was examined, with
particular focus on project characteristics, the selection of safe contractors, contractual
safety requirements, and the owner’s participation in safety management during project
execution. By identifying practices of owners associated with good project safety
performances, the author has given guidance on how owners directly impact safety
performance.
.
29
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 METHODOLOGY
QUESTIONNAIRE STRUCTURE
The effectiveness of the designed questionnaire was checked with the help of a pilot
survey carried out in the first phase of the project work. The pilot survey was carried out
with four construction companies in Chennai. The questionnaire was modified based on
the feedback of the survey.
In the date collection phase the data was obtained from ninety construction companies
mostly around Chennai and other major cities in Tamilnadu. The construction sites were
visited in person and the questionnaire was distributed to the concerned person. The
response was obtained immediately or collected later at the planned time. The projects
that were executed currently by the surveyed companies are mostly residential complex
and information technological parks. The cost of the project varies from eight crores and
31
one hundred and twenty crores. The respondents were mostly project managers and site
engineers.
In the data analysis phase the questionnaire was numbered when it is obtained from
the respondent. The data analysis sought to establish the variables that affect construction
safety. The mean and standard deviation for each response was made for the optional
questions and Likert scaled questions. In case of other questions the total response of the
questionnaire is counted. The results are presented in terms of tables and charts.
In the implementation phase, based on the results of the survey conclusion was made
and the results are presented. A booklet of minimum safety precautions to be followed in
construction sites was prepared based on the available codes and guidelines. The booklet
was prepared keeping in mind the medium and small level contractors who are lagging
behind in construction safety standards. The booklet was distributed to the companies for
possible implementation in their construction site, to minimise accident and to improve
safety in their construction sites.
32
CHAPTER 4
RESULT ANALYSIS
The questionnaire was distributed among two hundred companies mostly around
Chennai and other important cities. Totally ninety questionnaire returned as on date. The
response rate was (45%).The percentage of companies that had participated in the survey
are shown in the table 4.1
Table 4.1 Distribution of companies
The respondents were from various departments as shown in table 4.2. The average
experience of the respondents was 6 years and varies from a minimum of one year to a
maximum of sixteen years. The projects currently handled by the surveyed companies are
residential complexes, information technology parks and commercial complexes.
The break up of the number of workers working in the construction site is shown
in the figure 4.1. The working shifts in most of the sites are two shift bases. The working
hours in each shift varies from ten to fourteen hours.
50-100
workers
22%
0-50
workers
42%
100-150
workers
Figure 4.1 Percentage of workers in construction site.
60
48
50
Percentage of workers
40 37
30
20 15
10
0
<10 crews 10 - 20 crews > 20 crews
Number of crews
The percentage of safety investment that was made by the companies is less and
not defined clearly. The general types of accident that commonly occur in construction
site as observed by the respondents are stated below:
1. Falling from height.
2. Failure of temporary structures.
3. Fall of objects.
4. Hit by object.
5. Electrocution.
6. Slippage.
7. Caught in between.
8. Collapse.
The cause for the accidents as stated by the respondents is shown in Figure 4.3.
Out of the ninety companies surveyed accident has occurred in twelve construction sites.
There is no fatality in the surveyed companies. The damages that are reported after an
accident are worker injury, loss of man days, wastage of material, breakage of form
materials, financial claims, etc. The financial loss in terms of claim for medical treatment
to injured worker, insurance claims and material costs vary from rupees ten thousand for
minor injuries to one lakhs fourty thousand rupees. Out of the ninety companies surveyed
four companies face legal suits for the cause of accident.
Unsafe act
Coworker 9%
6%
Unexpected/
Natural
7%
Worker was at
fault
53%
Unsafe
condition
25%
Out of the companies surveyed only thirty two companies (35 percent) have a
separate safety department. In the remaining companies the safety measures are taken
care by the execution department. Seventy four companies (82 percent) admitted that the
top management has involvement in safety measures at site. The site safety is checked
frequently by the top managements of these companies. In most of the companies the
supervisors are given authority to stop work for identified hazards. Fourty companies (44
percent) accepted that they do not provide adequate personal protective equipment to
their workers. In most of the companies even though the company provide adequate
personal protective equipment, due to non availability of strict rules and regulation the
workers are not using them properly.
Project managers of twenty two companies (24 percent) attend safety meeting
regularly. Almost all the companies surveyed have first aid facility in site and pays for
the medical expenses of the injured workers, only six companies (7 percent) have medical
practitioner available in site during the working hours. Totally fifty two companies (58
percent) provide safety training to their workers and seventy eight companies (87
percent) accepted that the training given to workers are effective. Fifty companies (56
percent) keep daily safety records of the project. Very few companies provide workers
compensation insurance for their injured workers. All the companies accepted that the
schedule pressure in completing the project was passed directly to construction workers.
Six companies (8 percent) have won safety award. The results are shown in figure 4.4.
36
100
90
80
Percentage of companies 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Most of the companies that take part in the survey have a separate environment
health and safety (EHS) document. But the safety provisions that are recommended in the
EHS document are not implemented in construction sites.
The results of the Likert scaled questions are shown in Table 4.3. The mean value
of all the factors that affect construction site safety vary between 2.22 to 4.78, which
emphasis that in the whole of the companies that was surveyed the safety features are
between low and very high level.. Out of the thirty one factors considered three factors
were ranked as very high, ten factors as high, fourteen factors as medium and four factors
37
as low effect with respect to safety. The coordination and control of sub contractor,
control on sub contractor’s safety behaviour and the provision of personal protective
equipment by the company were ranked as top three factors that affect construction safety
with an average mean of 4.78, 4.72 and 4.56 respectively.
The standard deviation (σ) of the respondents varies around 1, revealing that the
response is same for all the companies. The maximum deviation of 1.19 and 1.18 was
observed in case of usage of heavy equipment and application of new technology in the
project respectively. This is due to the reason that most of the companies surveyed use
traditional methods for building construction. The management of most of the companies
is not willing to invest much on plant and machinery. Implementing the safety practices
in construction sites was a major hurdle as said by the respondents. This is mainly due to
the lack of management commitment/ interest in safety measures.
38
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
5.1 CONCLUSION
The important finding of this study is that site safety is affected by company
safety policy; construction process; personnel management with regard to safety. If these
factors are addressed and monitored closely, accident reduction may be realized in
construction sites. The construction companies shall also be willing to give safety
training/awareness to the construction workers to reduce and eliminate the future lost
time injuries, time and cost. Certain ground rules need to framed by the construction
companies for effective and efficient use of personnel protective equipment.
40
The results show that it is very important for both workers and supervisors to
adopt safe work behaviours. The willingness of workers to adopt safe work practices also
depends largely on the perception of safety, level of safety education and training
received, cultural back-grounds and communication between fellow workers and
superiors. Supervisors play an important role in influencing their workers in the adoption
of safe work behaviours. The supervisor’s safety behaviours and actions have a direct
impact and influence on workers. To portray positive safety behaviours, supervisors are
required to lead by example, integrate safety into all phases of the job, never ignore near
miss occurrences and have no blame cultural mind sets.
The results also show that the influence of management on the safety and health
standards on site is very crucial. The responsibilities and roles that management plays
will determine the over all safety performance of the entire site. Safety culture has to be
adopted in all organisations through strong support and encouragement by senior
management. By management’s endorsement, safety promotion will boost the morale and
motivate site personnel to think and works safely.
A booklet was prepared based on the “Building and other construction workers
(regulation of employment and conditions of service) rules, 1996”. The booklet was
distributed to small and medium level construction companies for possible
implementation on their construction sites.
1. The questionnaire can be modified based on the need for a particular type of
project and surveyed.
2. The survey can be carried out by separating the construction companies based on
the factors like type of company, annual turn over, location of the company, etc.
3. Statistical analysis can be further carried out to explore the results of the survey.
4. The effective use of the booklet prepared can be checked and corrections can be
made based on the needs of the construction site requirement.
41
REFERENCES
1. Christopher Auld.M, J. C. Herbert Emery and Daniel V. Gordon (2001), “The
Efficacy of Construction Site Safety Inspections”, Journal of Labor
Economics, volume 19, The University of Chicago, 900–921.
2. Dayana. B. Costa; Carlos T. Formoso; Michail Kagio glou; Luis F. Alarcón;
and Carlos. H.Caldas,M (2006) “Benchmarking Initiatives in the Construction
Industry: Lessons Learned and Improvement Opportunities” Journal of
Management in Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 1,2006.ASCE,158–167.
3. Dominic Cooper, “Improving Safety Culture-A Practical Guide”, John Wiley
and son’s ltd, 1998.
4. Edwin Sawacha ,Shamil Naoum and Daniel Fong (1999) “Factors affecting
safety performance on construction sited” International Journal of Project
Management, Volume 17, 307-315.
5. Evelyn Ai Lin Teo , Florence Yean Ling, Adrian Fook (2005) “Framework for
project managers to manage construction safety” International Journal of
Project Management ,volume 23 september 2005, 329–341.
6. Fang D. P; X. Y. Huang; and Jimmie Hinze, M. (2004) “Benchmarking
Studies on Construction Safety Management in China” Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 3, June 1, 2004.
ASCE. 424–432.
7. Gregory Carter and Simon D. Smith (2006) “Safety Hazard Identification on
Construction Projects” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,
Vol.132, No. 2, February 1, 2006. ASCE, 197-205.
8. Guidelines for safety management plans”, Department of Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources, workplace standards Tasmania.
9. Helen Lingard, Steve Rowlinson (1998), “Behaviour-based safety
management in Hong Kong's construction industry”,Construction
Management & Economics, Volume 16, July 1, 1998, 481 – 488.
10. Joe M. Wilson Jr. and Enno Koehn,(2000) “Safety management : problems
encountered and recommended solutions” Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 1, January 2000. ASCE, 77-79.
42
11. John A. Gambatese, Michael Behm, and Jimmie W. Hinze, (2005) “Viability
of Designing for Construction Worker Safety” Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 9,September 1, 2005,ASCE ,
80-88.
12. Michael Toole.P.E (2005) “Increasing Engineers Role in Construction
Safety: Opportunities and Barriers” Journal of Professional Issues in
Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 3, July 1, 2005. ASCE, 199–207.
13. OsamaAbudayyeh , Tycho K. Fredericks , Steven E. Butt , Areen Shaar(2006)
“An investigation of managements commitment to construction safety”
International Journal of Project Management , volume 20,167–174.
14. Ricardo Ramírez R. , Luis Fernando Alarcón C. and Peter Knights (2002)
“Benchmarking management practices in the construction industry”
International Journal of Project Management , volume 12,158-166.
15. Ron Sharpe; (1995)“safety plus improving construction worker safety”.
Journal of construction Industry Institute, Australia Inc.
16. Satish B. Mohan and Bryan D. Niles (2002) “ Effectiveness of Occupational
safety and Health Administration Citations”, Practical periodical on structural
design and construction,Vol.7, No.2, May 1, 2002,ASCE,85-89.
17. Sherif Mohamed (2003) “Scorecard Approach to Benchmarking
Organizational Safety Culture in Construction”, Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 1, February 1, 2003,ASCE,
80-88.
18. Todd W. Loushine, Peter Hoonakker , Pascal Carayon , Michael J. Smith ,
and E. Andrew Kapp (2005) “Safety and quality management systems in
construction some insight from contractors” Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol. 152, No. 1, April, 2006,ASCE,52-61.
19. Xinyu Huang and Jimmie Hinze (2006) “Owner’s Role in Construction
Safety” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.132, No.
2, February 1, 2006. ASCE, 164–173.
20. www.ogc.gov.uk/sdtoolkit/deliveryteam/index.html.
21. www.constructingexcellence.org.uk/zones/kpizone/benchmarking/default.jsp.
43
ANNEXURE - A
BENCHMARKING STUDIES ON SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES
The significance of construction industry to the economic and social life of the
country is note worthy. The construction industry is very large, complex, and different
from other industries. Hence it is prone to the effect of accidents that may be even fatal.
Hence safety plays an important role in all aspects of the construction industry.
GENERAL INFORMATION
13. What is the total number of accidents that occurred in the project?
14. What is the number of fatalities?
15. What are the types of damages reported?
16. What is the cause for the accident?
17. What is the financial loss due to accident (Till date)?
18. What is the time delay due to accident (Till date)?
19. What is the number of complaints/grievances/legal suits your company is facing
due to accident?
20. What is the number of workers / supervisors given medical training?
46
PART - 2
1. Is there a separate safety department in your company? Yes / No
2. Whether top management inspects site safety regularly? Yes / No
3. Whether top management checks safety records of the project? Yes / No
4. Whether the company provides adequate personnel protective equipment to all
workers? Yes / No
5. Whether the safety supervisor has authority to stop site work for identified
hazards? Yes / No
6. Whether the project manager attends the safety meetings? Yes / No
7. Whether safety meetings are attended by workers ?Yes / No
8. Whether daily safety records are kept? Yes / No
9. Whether there is any safety training for new workers? Yes / No
10. Is the training effective? Yes / No
11. Whether the schedule pressures are passed on to the workers? Yes / No
12. Whether medical professional available in the site? Yes / No
13. Whether first aid facilities are available in the site? Yes / No
14. Whether the company buys workers compensation insurance? Yes / No
15. Whether the company pays for the medical expenses of injured workers? Yes / No
16. Has your company received any award for safety? Yes / No
47
PART - 3
ANNEXURE B
This booklet has been prepared based on the provisions of “BUILDING AND
OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT
AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) RULES, 1996”. The booklet has been prepared
for possible implementation of required safety measures in construction sites.
The Act has been made applicable to even small establishments employing
10 workers in any building and other construction work.
SAFETY COMMITTEES.
Every establishment wherein 500 or more building workers are ordinarily
employed, there shall be a safety committee constituted by the employer which shall be
represented by equal number of representatives of employer and the building workers
employed in such establishment
The main functions of the safety committee, shall be,
1. To identify probable cases of accident and safe practice in building or other
construction work and to suggest remedial measures.
2. To stimulate interest of employees and building workers in safety by organising
safety weeks, safety competitions, talks and film shows on safety, preparing
posters or taking similar other measures as and when required or as necessary.
3. To go round the construction site with a view to check unsafe practices and defect
unsafe conditions and to recommend remedial measures for their rectification
including first aid, medical and welfare facilities.
4. To look into the health hazards associated with handling different types of
explosives, chemicals and other construction materials and to suggest remedial
measures including use of proper personal protective equipment.
5. To suggest measures for improving welfare amenities in the construction site and
other miscellaneous aspects of safety, health and welfare in building or other
construction work.
50
FIRE PROTECTION
The such construction site is provided with,-
1. Fire extinguishing equipment sufficient to extinguish any probable fire at such
construction site.
2. An adequate water supply at ample pressure to control fire hazard.
3. Number of trained persons required to operate the fire extinguishing equipment
4. Fire extinguishing equipment provided properly maintained and inspected at
regular intervals of not less than once in a year by the responsible person and a
record of such inspections is maintained;
FENCING OF MOTORS
1. All motors, cogwheels, chains and friction gearing, flywheels, shafting, dangerous
and moving parts of machinery and steam pipes are securely fenced.
2. The fencing of dangerous parts of machinery is not removed while such
machinery is in motion or in use.
51
3. No part of any machinery which is in motion and which is not securely fenced is
examined, lubricated, adjusted or repaired except by a person skilled for such
examination, lubrication , adjustment or repairs.
4. Machine parts are cleaned when such machine is stopped.
5. When a machine is stopped for servicing or repairs adequate measures are taken
to ensure that such machine does not restart inadvertently.
OVERHEAD PROTECTION
1. The employer shall ensure at the building or other construction work that
overhead protection is erected along the periphery of every building under
construction which shall be of 15 m or more in height when completed.
2. Overhead protection referred shall not be less than 2 m wide and shall be erected
at a height not more than 5 m above the base of the building and. the outer edge
of such overhead protection shall be 150mm higher than the inner edge thereof or
shall be erected at an angle of not more than 20° to its horizontal sloping into the
building.
3. The employer shall ensure at the building and other construction work that any
area exposed to risk or falling material articles or objects is roped off or cordoned
off or otherwise suitably guarded from inadvertent entry of persons other than
building worker at work in such area.
CORROSIVE SUBSTANCES
The employer shall ensure that corrosive substances, including alkalis and acids,
shall be stored and used by a person dealing with such substances at a building or other
construction work in such a manner that it does not endanger the building worker and
54
EYE PROTECTION.
Suitable personal protective equipment for the protection of eyes shall be
provided by an employer and used by the building worker engaged in operations like
welding, cutting, chipping, grinding or similar operations which may cause hazard to his
eyes at a building or other construction work.
ELECTRICAL HAZARDS
1. . The employer shall display and maintain suitable warning signs at conspicuous
places at a building or other construction work.
2. Before commencement of any building or other construction work, the employer
shall take adequate measures to prevent any worker from coming into physical
contact with any electrical equipment or apparatus, machines or live electrical
circuit which may cause electrical hazard during the course of his employment at
a building or other construction work
3. In workplaces at a building or other construction work where the exact location of
underground electric power line is not known, the building workers using
jackhammers, crow bars or other hand-tools which may come in contact with a
live electrical line shall be provided by the employer with insulated protective
gloves and footwear of the type in accordance with the national standards.
4. The employer shall ensure that as far as practicable, no wiring, which may come
in contact with water or which may be mechanically damaged, is left on ground or
floor at a building or other construction work.
5. The employer shall ensure that all electrical appliances and current currying
equipment used at a building or other construction work are made of sound
material and are properly and adequately earthed. The employer shall ensure that
all temporary electrical installations at building or other construction work are
provided with earth-leakage circuit breakers.
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
1. Whenever any building or other construction work is being carried on, or is
located in close proximity to a road or any other place where any vehicular traffic
may cause danger to building workers, the employer shall ensure that such
building or other construction work is barricaded and suitable warning signs and
lights displayed or erected to prevent such danger.
2. The employer shall ensure that all vehicles used at construction site of building or
other construction work comply with the requirements of the Motor Vehicles Act
1988 (Central Act 59 of 1988) and the rules made there under.
56
3. The employer shall ensure that a driver of a vehicle of any class or description
operating at a construction site of a building or other construction work holds
valid driving licence under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Central Act 59 of
1988).
4. The maximum speed of vehicles plying in the construction sites should not exceed
20 Kmph
STABILITY OF STRUCTURES
The employer shall ensure that no wall, chimney or other structure or part of a
structure is left unguarded in such condition that it may fall, collapse or weaken due to
wind pressure vibration due to any other reason at a site of a building or other
construction work.
ILLUMINATION OF PASSAGE-WAYS
The employer shall ensure that illumination sufficient for maintaining safe
working conditions at a site of a building or other construction work is provided where
building workers are required to work or pass and for passage ways, stairways and
landing as per the requirement.
STACKING OF MATERIALS
1. All building materials are stored or stacked in safe and orderly manner to avoid
obstruction of any passageway or place of work;
2. Material piles (or) stored or stacked in such a manner as to ensure stability;
3. Material or equipment is not stored upon any floor or platform in such quantity as
to exceed its safe carrying capacity: and
4. Material or equipment is not stored or placed so close to any edge of a floor or
platform as to endanger the safety of persons below or working in the vicinity.
DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS
1. Debris are handled and disposed of by a method which does not cause danger to
the safety of a person.
57
INSTALLATION
1. Installation of cranes shall be made by competent persons.
2. It shall be installed as such appliances cannot be displaced by the load, vibration
or other influences.
58
3. In a manner that the operator of such appliances is not exposed to danger from
loads, ropes or drums.
4. In a manner that the operator can either see over the zone of operation or
communicate with all loading and unloading points by signal, or other
communication system.
5. Adequate clearance is provided between parts or loads of lifting appliances and
the fixed objects such as walls and posts or electrical conductors.
6. The lifting appliances, when exposed to wind loading are given sufficient
additional strength, stability and rigidity to withstand such loading safely; and no
structural alterations or repairs are made on any part of the lifting appliances that
affect the safety of such appliances without obtaining the opinion of the
competent person to this effect.
10. Every receptacle used for hoisting bricks, tiles, slates or other material is suitably
enclosed as to prevent the fall of any such materials.
11. The hoisting platform is enclosed when loose materials or loaded wheel-barrows
are placed directly on such platform or lowering such material or wheel-barrows.
12. No material is raised, lowered or slowed with any lifting appliance in such a way
as to cause sudden jerks to such appliance.
13. In hoisting a barrow any wheel of such barrow is not used as a means of support
unless adequate steps are taken to prevent the axle of such wheel from slipping
out of its bearings.
14. Long objects like planks or girders are provided with a tag line to prevent any
possibility of danger while raising or lowering such objects.
15. during the process of landing of material, a building worker is not permitted to
lean out into empty space for finding out of the loading and unloading of such
material.
16. The hoisting of loads at places where there is regular flow of traffic is carried out
in an enclosed space, or in case such hoisting is impracticable in enclosed space,
measures are taken to hold up or divert the traffic during the time of such hoisting.
17. Adequate steps are taken to prevent a load in the course of being hoisted or
lowered from coming into contact with any object to avoid any displacement of
such load.
18. Appliances are provided and used for building heavy loads when raising or
lowering heavy loads to avoid crushing of hands of building workers during such
raising or lowering of loads.
HOISTS
1. Hoist towers are, designed according to relevant national standards.
2. Hoist shafts are provided with rigid panels or other adequate fencing,
(i) At the ground level on all sides of such shafts; and
(ii) At all other levels on all sides of the access to such shafts;
3. The walls of hoist shafts, except at approaches, extend at least 2 m above the
floor or platform of access to such shafts.
60
17. A hoisting engine is protected by a suitable cover against weather and falling
objects.
18. A hoisting engine set up in a public thoroughfare is completely enclosed.
19. All exhaust steam pipes discharge steam in such a manner that the steam so
discharged does not scald any person or obstruct the operator's view.
20. The motion of a hoist is not reversed without first bringing it to rest to avoid any
harm from such reverse motion.
21. A hoist not designed for the conveyance of persons, is not set in motion from the
platform of such hoist.
22. Pawls and ratchet wheels of a hoist, requiring disengagement of such pawls from
such ratchet wheels, before the platform of such hoist is lowered, are not used.
23. A platform of a hoist is capable of supporting such maximum load that such
platform may carry, with a safety factor of at least three.
24. A platform of a hoist is equipped with suitable safety gear which can hold such
platform with its maximum load in case its hoisting rope breaks.
25. On platform of a hoist, the wheelbarrows or truck are efficiently blocked in a safe
position.
26. A cage of a hoist or a platform, where the building workers are required to enter
into such cage or to go on such platform at landing level, is provided with a
locking arrangement to prevent such cage or platform from moving during the
time a worker enters or leaves such cage or platform.
27. The sides of a platform of a hoist, which are not used for loading or unloading, are
provided with toe-board and enclosures of a wire mesh or any other suitable
means to prevent the fall of any part of a load from such platform.
28. A platform of a hoist, which has any probability of falling and part of load from it.
is provided with an adequate covering with such fall.
29. The counter-weights of a hoist consisting of an assemblage of several parts are so
constructed that such parts are rigidly connected together,
30. The counter-weights of a hoist run between guides.
31. At every level of work the building workers are provided with adequate platforms
for performing such work.
62
CONCRETING WORK
1. Explain the sequence of steps to be taken for completion of the construction.
2. Formwork and shores used for concrete work are structurally safe and are
properly braced or tied together so as to maintain position and shape.
3. Formwork structure used for concrete work has sufficient cat-walks and other
secure access for inspection of such structure if such structure is in two or more
tiers.
4. A building worker handling cement or concrete, wears close-fitting clothing,
gloves, helmet or hard hat, safety goggles, proper foot wear and respirator or
mask to protect him from danger in such handling.
5. Moving parts of the elevators, hoists, screens, bunkers, chutes, grouting
equipment used for concrete work and of other equipment used for storing,
transport and other handling ingredients of concrete are securely fenced to avoid
contact of building workers with such moving parts.
6. Concrete buckets used with cranes or aerial cable ways are free from projections
from which accumulations of concrete could fall; and movements of concrete
buckets are governed by signals necessary to avoid any danger by such
movements.
7. Scaffolding carrying a pipe for pumped concrete is strong enough to support such
pipe at time when such pipe is tilled with concrete or water or any other liquid and
to bear all the building workers who may be on such scaffold at such time, safely.
8. Every pipe for carrying pumped concrete is securely anchored at its end point and
at each curve on it; provided near the top of such pipe with an air release valve:
and securely attached to a pump nozzle by a bolted collar or other adequate
means.
9. The operation of concrete pumps is governed by standard signals.
10. A building worker, who is in good physical condition, operates vibrators used in
concreting work; all practical measures are taken to reduce the amount of
vibration transmitted to the operators working in concreting work.
11. Care to be taken that the building workers do not stand directly over jacking
equipment while stressing of concrete girders and beams is being done.
63
STRIPPING
1. Stripping of form work used in concreting work commenced until the concrete
such form work is fully set, examined and certified to this effect by the
responsible person and record of such examination and certification is maintained.
2. Stripped forms in concreting work are removed or stock-piled promptly after
stripping from all areas in which building workers are required to work or pass.
3. Protruding nails, wire ties and other form work accessories not required for
subsequent concreting work are pulled, cut or otherwise made safe.
RESHORING
Reshoring used in concreting work is provided to a slab or beam for its safe
support after its stripping or where such slab or beam is subjected to superimposed loads
due to construction above such slab or beam.
11. For type C soils like gravel, sand, loamy sand, submerged soil or soil from which
water is freely seeping; or submerged rock that is not stable a sloping of 1.5 : 1 is
to be provided.
SAFETY BELT
1. Safety belt, life lines and devices for the attachment of such life line conform to
the relevant national standards; every building worker is supplied with safety belt
and safety life lines for his protection and such building worker uses such bells
and life lines during the performance of his work.
66
2. The minimum breaking strength for anchors should be 3.5 kN or 4 times the
weight of worker and that of the wires of lifeline should not be less than 26.7 kN
for vertical lifeline and 89 kN for horizontal lifeline.
3. The use of safety belt must be insisted for working at height more than 2 m.
Free-fall of a person should not to exceed 1.80 m
4. All building workers using safety belts and safety life lines have the knowledge of
safe use and maintenance of such belts and life lines and are supplied with
necessary instructions.
SAFETY NET
Every safety net is of adequate strength made of sound material and is suitable for use
and conforms to the relevant national standards.
1. The responsible person for maintenance of the safety nets and their use ensures
safe fixing of such safety nets and provides such safety nets with suitable and to
sufficient anchorage so that the purpose for which such safety net is intended for
use is served.
2. The net used for protecting person from falling should be 100 x 100 mm mesh
and that used to protect person working below be 25 x 25 mm mesh.
3. The free fall distance should not exceed 6.0 m
4. For working at a height of 3.0 m the net shall extend up to 1.5 to 3.0 m. When the
height exceeds 4.0 m the net shall be provided for a minimum extension of 4.0 m.
FORM WORK
1. All form works are properly designed keeping in view the safety of building
workers, building or structures.
2. A responsible person for structural frame and form work,-inspects and examines
the material, timber, structural steel and scaffolding for its strength and suitability
before being taken into use.
3. Necessary steps or measures to correct any situation with a view to prevent
accident or dangerous occurrence during performance of such structural frame
and form work be taken.
67
SCAFFOLD
1. Every scaffold and every component thereof is of adequate construction, made of
sound material and free from defects and is safe for the purposes for which it is
intended for use.
2. When bamboo is used for scaffolding, such bamboo is of suitable quality, good
condition, free from protruding knots and stripped off to avoid any injury to
building workers during handling such bamboo.
3. No building worker is permitted to work on a scaffold which has been damaged or
weakened unless adequate safety measures have been taken to ensure the safety of
such building workers; and necessary warning signs are displayed at such places
where repairs of scaffold are undertaken.
4. Where a scaffold or a part of a scaffold is used which has previously been used by
another employer for his building workers, such scaffold or part thereof is used
only after its inspection and examination by a responsible person for its use that
such scaffold or part is safe and fit for such use.
5. The height of every tower scaffold used in building or other construction work is
not more than 8 times, the lesser of a base dimension of such scaffold.
6. All metal scaffolds used in building or other construction work conform to the
relevant national standards.
WORKING PLATFORM.
1. Working platform is provided around the face or edge of a building adjoining
at every uppermost permanent floor of such building under construction and at
any level where construction work of such building is carried out.
2. A platform is designed to suit the number of building workers to be employed
on each bay of a scaffold work on such platform and the materials or articles
and tools to be carried with them in such bay.
3. The safe working load and the number of building workers to be employed in
each bay of a scaffold are displayed for the information of all the building
workers employed at such construction site.
68
OPENING
1. There is no opening in any working platform except for allowing access to
such working platform.
2. Wherever opening on a platform is unavoidable, necessary measures for
protection against falling of objects or building workers from such
platform are taken by providing suitable safety nets, belts or any other
similar means.
3. Access from one working platform to another platform on a scaffold, if
required, is provided with suitable and safe ladder for the use of building
workers, working on such platform.
69
GUARDRAILS
1. Every side of a working platform from which a person is liable to fall is provided
with suitable and safety guardrails and toe-board of adequate strength to prevent
fall of any building worker, material or tools from such platform.
2. Rails must be able to withstand a minimum force of 75 kgs. / mt.
3. The top rails should be provided at a height of 900 mm.
4. Toe boards for guardrail should be at least 150 mm wide.
Preventable Accidents,
if not prevented due to our negligence,
It is nothing short of a murder.
- Dr.S.Radhakrishnan