pre-test post-test 22 31 26 27 28 32 28 32 28 34 31 36 32 30 31 32 26 27 31 28 26 37 34 34 30 36 30 30 26 25 30 28 28 26 35 33 17 19 Highest 35 37 Lowest 17 19

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 pre-test post-test

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means Variable 1 30.36842105 20.02339181 19 0.572280623 0 18 2.179449472 0.021412037 1.734063592 0.042824075 2.100922037

Mean Variance Observations Pearson Correlation Hypothesized Mean Difference df t Stat P(T<=t) one-tail t Critical one-tail P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail

Pre-Test & Post Test Analysis

Interpretation of Data
The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from17 to 35 while post test scores ranged from 19 to 37 which means an increase of scores as shown in the gap between the red line(posttest) and blue line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 30.36 for posttest and 28.36 for pre-test. Analysis The table reveals that the t Stat is equal 2.179, this is the mean difference between the post test and pres test scores. The p-value is .021 which is greater than .01 which means that the test scores are NOT significantly different at 1% level. Conclusion As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the Competency-Based Training(CBT) for Trainers Methodology Level I has no effect with the trainees. Recommendation Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore recommended:

Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore recommended: 1. CBLM must contain sufficient information and is relevant to the objectives. 2. Select methods that are appropriate with the training need. 3. Provide appropriate course activities.

Variable 2 28.36842105 17.24561404 19

PRE-TEST POST-TEST 41 61 49 57 53 62 53 62 53 64 59 66 61 60 59 62 49 57 59 58 49 67 65 64 57 66 57 60 49 55 57 58 53 56 67 63 31 49 53.74 60.37

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means Variable 1 Mean 60.36842105 Variance 20.02339181 Observations 19 Pearson Correlation 0.572280623 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0 df 18 t Stat 4.240504413 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.000245961 t Critical one-tail 1.734063592 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.000491922 t Critical two-tail 2.100922037 Variable 2 53.73684211 68.98245614 19

Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis

Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis

Interpretation of Data The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 31 to 67 while post test scores ranged from 49 to 67 which means increase of scores as shown in the gap between the red line(posttest) and blue line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 60.37 for posttest and 53.74 for pre-test. Analysis Comparison between pre-test and posttest using paired t-test as revealed by the table of values shows pre-test and posttest are significantly different with a p = 0.00025. This means that mean scores increased. Conclusion As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the Competency Based Training(CBT) for Enhanced Training Methodology I effectively increased the learnings of the trainees. Recommendation Competency-Based Training for Trainers Methodology I is therefore recommended for use in all TESDA institutions using the Competency-Based Training Materials(CBLM).

PRE-TEST POST-TEST

ost test scores ranged from posttest) and blue test.

by the table of values shows mean scores increased.

during the Competencylearnings of the trainees.

mended for use in all TESDA