Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Short-Term Memory:
Duration: Up to 30secs. Capacity: 7+/-2digit span; can be increased with chunking. Encoding: Visually and Acoustically.
Long-Term Memory:
Duration: Potentially unlimited. Capacity: Potentially unlimited. Encoding: Visually, Acoustically and Semantically.
Murdock (1962)
Aim: To investigate free recall and its effect on a persons memory. Method: Ppts were given words to remember and he asked them to recall as many as possible, in any order. Results: The first words to be recalled were those the ppts heard last; the recency effect, evidence that the last words are stored in the STM. The other words recalled were then heard first; the primacy effect, stored in the LTM. Conclusion: When we are asked to recall a list of words we mainly remember the first and last words. This is because the first words have been stored in the LTM while the last words are still in the STM.
Explanations of Memory
Multi-Store Model:
Atkinson and Shiffrin Evidence: Murdock (1962) - suggests there are multiple stores where information such as words are stored. Beardsley (1997) the hippocampus and the prefrontal lobe suggests that there are physical stores as well.
Evaluation: + Provides simple description of memory process. + Atkinson and Shiffrin used a scientific approach to carry out research. + There is research to support the MSM. - Criticised for its focus on memory of new facts, doesnt explain everyday experiences with memory.
Levels of Processing:
Developed by Craig and Lockhart. Agreed with MSM except they said that the ability to remember information is based on how we process it. Deep processing processing at a deeper level, e.g. thinking about meaning. Shallow processing- processing a shallow level, e.g. rhyming words.
Reconstructive Memory:
Schema - a pocket of associated information.
Bartlett (1932)
Aim: To test the idea that people use existing knowledge to understand new information. Method: Ppts were given The War of the Ghosts to read. Once they had read it they were asked to recall everything they could about the story (over varying periods of time, serial reproduction). Results: The majority of people added their own meaning to the story and reconstructed their memories to try to make sense of the story. He noticed that they: - Missed out some details and added new ones. - Added emphasis to some parts. - Changed the order of incidents. Conclusion: We use schemas to help us fill in gaps in our memory. Evaluation: - Very dated and other theories have taken a more scientific approach. - The research is artificial and not an everyday experience of memory, when researchers have asked people to recall real experiences their recollections were very similar.
Explanations of Forgetting
Interference Theory:
Retroactive interference - new information interferes with the ability to remember old. Proactive interference - old information interferes with the ability to learn new.
Amnesia:
Retrograde - cannot remember events what occurred before the development of amnesia. Anterograde - a loss of memory of what happens after the development of amnesia.
Case Study of HM
- H.M was epileptic, at 27 he underwent surgery to try and cure his epilepcy. - The hippocampus was removed from both sides of his brain causing anterograde amnesia. - His memory of events prior to surgery were near normal but he couldnt remember anything after the surgery e.g. he didnt recognise people. - His short term memory was working and so could recall facts, but couldnt transfer information into his LTM.
Eyewitness Testimony
Face Recognition:
Bruce and Young(1998) Developed a model that suggest how facial perception and our memory of faces work.
We see individual features of the face, e.g. eyes, mouth, nose, etc. We put all of the features together to form a mental picture of the face. We use the metal picture to 'look up' the face to see if we do or don't know the person.
Reliable?
+ The model shows that we can look up the face and remember it how we saw it before. - Our correct perception of things can be influenced by our own experiences. - The face is not just a collection of features as it carries information about other things such as age and emotion. - Photofit is used to put a collection of features onto a face, however Bruce and Young say that it is the interaction between the features that is important and so does not work effectively.
Leading Questions:
The idea that the recall of an event can change by the way in which the question is asked.
Memory Improvement
Organisation:
Bousfield (1963)
Aim: To see if people organise information in the LTM. Method: Ppts were shown 60 randomly presented words and then asked them to recall the words in any order they wanted; free recall. Words came from 4 categories: vegetables, animals, professions and names. Results: The order ppts recalled the words were in clusters from these categories. Conclusion: Concluded that people spontaneously organised by meaning.
Context:
Godden and Baddeley (1975)
Aim: To see if context improves a persons memory. Method: Deep-sea divers were asked to memorise a list of words. There were 2 groups; one learnt the words on a beach and the others learnt them 5metres under water. These 2 groups were then split into 2 sub-groups (into halves). One half was asked to stay put while the other went to the opposite place, e.g. if they learnt on the beach they would recall underwater and vice versa. This was a free recall test and a field experiment. Results: Those who recalled in the same environment as that in which they had learned the words recalled 40% more than those recalling in a different environment. Conclusion: The recall of information is improved if it occurs in the same context it was learnt.
Elaboration:
We process the information deeply and so elaboration improves our ability to recall.
Methods of Investigation 1:
Aims and Hypothesis:
Aim - a general statement of why the study is being carried out. A hypothesis is: - A clear statement - A prediction - Testable - Created at the beginning of the research process. Directional - states there will be a difference in results and predicts this difference. E.g. females will score higher than males in the test. Non-Directional - states that there will be a difference in results. E.g. There will be a difference in score between males and females on the test. Null Hypothesis - written alongside the main hypothesis and predicts that any differences or similarities in results are due to chance alone; as we can never rule out this as a possibility.
Variables:
Independent Variable - the variable which researchers manipulate and is assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable. Dependent Variable - the variable that is affected by the change in the independent variable. Operationalizing the variables - knowing how to measure the variables such as in mph.
Naturalistic The independent variable Experiment occurs naturally meaning the researcher does not control it they just notice it.
+ More likely to produce natural behaviour. - Less chance of demand characteristics. + Allows researchers to investigate behaviours that may be unethical to otherwise study or create. + Low chance of demand characteristics.
Research Design:
Design Description Independent Testing separate groups of ppts, Groups each group tested in a different condition. Advantages + Avoids order effects. Disadvantages - More people needed compared to repeated measures. - Differences between ppts may affect results. - Order effects are likely to occur.
Repeated Measures
Matched Pairs
Testing separate groups of ppts but each member in one group has a pair in the other matched based on things such as age, sex or social background.
+ Avoids difference in ppts. + Fewer people needed. + Reduces ppts variables. + Avoids order effects.
Sampling:
Sample Random Sample Description Every member of target population has equal chance of being selected. E.g. names in a hat. Using anyone in the target population who is available at the time. E.g. the first people in the lunch hall. Selecting ppts at fixed intervals. E.g. selecting every 10th person on a register. A proportional sample. The categories which you split ppts into have an equal number in the sample. E.g. if you wanted to test womens attitudes towards childcare and if it differs with job type you might take 30 self-employed and 30 unemployed. Advantages + Provides unbiased, representative sample of the target population. + Quick. + Cheap. Disadvantages - Can be time consuming and is often impossible when there is a very large target population. - May not be representative of target population in general. - Need to ensure the list does not contain a hidden order. - Time consuming. - Expensive.
Opportunity Sample
Systematic Sample
+ Fairly quick. + Fairly cheap. + Can eliminate biased. + Very representative sample.
Stratified Sample
2:
Qualitative Research Methods:
Method Interview Description/Use Researcher asks questions face to face. Advantages + Can obtain detailed information. + Avoids having to simplify complex issues. + Greater attention to individuals point of view. + Quick and easy. + Large sample can be used. + People who are geographically distant can be studied. Disadvantages - May feel need to give desirable answers. - Difficult to analyse if unstructured. - Can be time consuming and expensive. - Sample is biased; relies on people returning it. - Respondents may not give accurate answers, possibly because of misunderstanding or boredom. - Unable to give consent.
Naturalistic Observation
Researcher watches peoples behaviour and measures specific aspects as precise as possible. An in depth description/observation & analysis of one person or situation.
Case Study
+ More natural behaviour. + Good way to observe people in natural environment. + Rich, detailed data. + Can study a topic which may be unethical to study via an experiment. + Permits study over time.
- Researcher can be bias. - Results cant be generalised. - No control over extraneous variables.
Confounding Variables
Standardised Procedure:
To ensure that all participants are tested in the same way the researcher must make sure that: - The investigation is in the same place, with the same equipment and materials placed in the same way. - The investigation is under the same conditions, including level of lighting, noise and heat. - The investigation is done at roughly the same time, as many people behave differently if tested at 9am rather than 5pm.
Controlling Variables:
If variables are not controlled, they can make the results invalid. A confounding variable is something that can affect the results. In order to control variables, all participants must undergo the same experience.
Standardised Instructions:
Participants must be given the same instructions in the same way. It is often better to write down instructions rather than to read them out loud as this eliminates bias in terms of accent and reading speed. Instructions must be clear, simple and unambiguous.
Data 1:
Descriptive Statistics:
Allows data to be described an presented, providing a summary of data gathered in the form of tables, graphs, averages, etc.
Measures of Dispersion:
How spread out the scores are. Range - the difference between the highest and lowest score. Percentages - divide the score by the total maximum score and multiply by 100. Graphical Representations - used to display data so it is easy to read.
2:
Correlational Studies:
Used to access the strength of the relationship between variables. Often used when it is inappropriate or unethical to use an experiment.
Ethical Considerations
Ethics:
Confidentiality - ppts information must not be shared unless agreed to by the ppt. Withdrawal - the ppts have the right to quit the experiment at any point. Distress - researchers must ensure that ppts are not caused any physical or mental harm. Deception - intentionally misleading/misinforming ppts with regards to the aim of the study. Informed Consent - ppts must be given information about the experiment to decide whether to take part or not. Debriefing - ppts are given enough information as possible after the experiment and given the option to discuss the experiment to ensure they leave in the same emotional and physical state as before.
Eye Contact:
Eye contact can indicate whether someone is interested. Pupil size can indicate emotion as it changes depending on your mood. Argyle created a list of function of eye contact: Reaction of the listener. Interest of the listener in the conversation. Make turn taking easier. To show emotion.
Facial Expressions
Universal:
Ekman (1972) suggested there are 6 universal facial expressions: Sadness Anger SAD FiSH with Disgust no eyes! Fear Surprise Happiness
Composites:
Sackheim (1978)
Aim: To test whether different sides of peoples faces display similar levels of emotion. Method: Ppts were given images of human faces posing 6 distinct emotions, plus a neutral expression, and their mirror reversals were split down the middle and left side and right side composites were created. Results: Subjects judged left side composites as expressing emotions more intensely than right side composites. Conclusion: The findings indicate hemispheric asymmetry in the control over emotional expression of the face. The left side displays emotion more intensely than the right.
Body Language
Posture:
Posture Type Postural Echo Open Posture Description People copy each others posture; often between friends. When you are not touching similar body parts and closing yourself in with body parts. When you are touching similar body parts and closing yourself in with your body parts. What Does It Tell Us? Conveys message of I am similar to you. Positive person, persuasive, welcoming. Shy, not positive, wants to be left alone.
Closed Posture
Gestures:
A form of NVC made with movement of part of the body. Often combined with speech for emphasis.
Body Gestures:
Humans often push their chest out and tilt their heads up to express superiority.
Facial Gestures:
E.g. eye rolling, nodding, head shaking, etc.
Personal Space
Distances:
Personal space - an emotionally charged bubble surrounding a person into which we dislike people entering. Hall (1966) defined 4 distances/zones of personal space each which we associate with different social interaction. Zone Size of Distance Social Uses Intimate Distance 0 - 0.5m Intimate relationships. Personal Distance 0.5 - 1.5m Close friends. Social Distance 1.5 - 4.0m Formal situations. Public Distance 4m+ Distance between one person and a group.
Research:
There are 3 main ways to investigate personal space: > Simulation technique; a situation of personal space is simulated through the use of dolls. The ppt is asked to move the doll to a location where they would feel comfortable. + Avoids emotional strain. - May not place accurately as they arent in the situation themselves. > Questionnaire; ppts complete a series of questions asking them about their feelings towards a variety of situations. + Anonymous, so more likely to be honest. - Closed questions only provide a limited number of answers which the person may not otherwise choose. > Field experiments; a confederate invade the personal space of ppts without their knowledge and observe their responses and sometimes give questionnaires afterwards to assess how the person reacted. + Response in a real setting. - Can cause distress to ppts.
Cultural Differences:
Hall (1966) conducted cross-cultural research into personal space. Cultures with high levels of sensory contact such as Spain and Greece had smaller personal space distances than countries with low level of sensory contact such as England and America.
Location:
Baxter (1970) found that personal space not only differs with culture but location too. He found that African-Americans interacted more closely in indoor settings than outdoor ones whilst Mexicans did the opposite.
Gender Differences:
Fisher and Byrne (1975) investigated differences in personal space between males and females. They arranged a confederate to sit either next to or opposite the ppt. After a few minutes the confederate would leave and another would approach the ppt asking for the ppts impression and opinions on the invasion. They found that males disliked people sitting opposite them whereas females disliked people sitting next to them. They also found that males were more likely to place belongings in front of them and females were more likely to place theirs to the side; showing that we try to create barriers to protect our personal space.
Status Differences:
The higher a persons status the more personal space commanded by them.