Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
academic success (Bishop & Edmundson, 1987; Fazio, Naremore, & Connell, 1996) Narrative plays a central role in education Tool of instruction Foundation of event knowledge Foster cognitive growth (Peterson, 1994)
years to exhibit weaknesses in narrative story grammar structure evaluative information lexical complexity (Manhardt & Rescorla, 2002)
The consideration of narrative abilities in assessment and
intervention with very young children who are at risk for language learning difficulties is critical given the importance of narrative in future academic and social success (Boudreau, 2008).
Effects of Poverty
Children raised in poverty are at risk for language delay, jeopardizing successful academic achievement (Hart & Risley, 1995; Roseberry-McKibben, 2008) Vocabulary Grammar Narrative Skills A child from impoverished home may have fewer contexts and practice opportunities to develop narrative skills as
Narrative Elicitation
Elicitation characteristics have been
demonstrated to significantly influence a child's production of a narrative (Ripich & Griffith, 1988; Schneider, 1996; Schneider & Dub, 2005; Spinillo & Pinto, 1994) Children are more sensitive at different ages to different elicitation methods (Schneider, 1996; Schneider & Dub, 2005)
Research Question
Are there differences between preschoolers from low and middle socioeconomic (SES) homes in their production of story grammar units, evaluative information, and lexical complexity in story retelling with pictures compared to story retelling without pictures?
Expected to find
The oral-with-pictures condition will provide more
support than the oral-only retell condition for preschoolers of both groups. Preschoolers from low-SES homes will not tell stories with as many story grammar units and evaluative elements or have as much lexical complexity as their mid-SES peers.
Methodology - Participants
56 children ages 4;0 5;0 Attend preschools in northeast Kansas Two groups based on socioeconomic status (SES) Low
Below poverty ($20,000/year/family of 4) Maternal education no higher than HS grad Above poverty but below $100,000/year Maternal education higher than HS grad but below the graduate level
Middle
Methodology - Participants
English the sole language of the home Hearing within normal limits Cognitive skills within normal limits Screened with KBIT-2 (Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004) Language skills across language continuum Testing with CELF-P-2 (Wiig, Secord, & Semel, 2004) Testing with standardized measures accomplished individually during first session (~30 minutes)
Methodology - Stimuli
Equivalent story episodes from wordless picture book OOPS by Mercer Mayer (1977) Balanced for story grammar units, evaluative information, and lexical complexity Two narratives elicited from children during second session following an introductory story (~15 minutes) Two experimental conditions Oral-only retell Oral retell with pictures Puppet used to act as nave listener
OOPS
OOPS
OOPS
OOPS
Data Measures
# of Story Grammar Units (Stein & Glenn, 1979;
Schneider, 1996) # of Evaluative Elements (Bamberg & Damrad-Frye, 1990) Lexical Complexity (Justice, Bowles, Kaderavek, Ukrainetz, Eisenberg, Gillam, 2006; Schneider, 2003)
C-units, total number of words, number of different words,
MLU-words, MLU-morphemes
Results
~75% of data have been collected Mid-SES: n = 16 Low-SES: n = 25 Significant main effects for SES Group, F(1,39) =3.696, p<.05, p2 =.439 , with mid-SES group performing more robustly than the low-SES group Elicitation Method, F(1,39)=3.617, p<.05, p2 =.434, with subjects performing more proficiently under the picturesupported retell condition than the oral-only retell Both SES and Elicitation are approaching a medium effect size Insignificant interaction
F(1,39)= 4.389, p<.05*, p2 =.101 F(1,39)= 9.952, p<.05*, p2 = .203 F(1,39)= 9.989, p<.05*, p2 =.204 F(1,39)=14.643, p<.05*, p2 =.273 F(1,39)=13.524, p<.05*, p2 =257
=.302 # Evaluative Elements F(1,39)= 6.849, p<.05*, p2 =.149 # C-Units F(1,39)=17.157, p<.05*, p2 =.306 # Total Words F(1,39)=22.283, p<.05*, p2 =.364 # Different Words F(1,39)=21.271, p<.05*, p2 =.353 MLU Words F(1,39)= 8.870, p<.05*, p2 =.185 MLU Morphemes F(1,39)= 7.908, p<.05*, p2 =.169
Results Summary
Differences are seen between preschoolers from low
and middle socio-economic homes in their production of their narrative retells. These differences are most notable in terms of lexical complexity measures of total number of words, number of different words, and MLU. Differences are seen in the narrative retells of preschoolers when elicited using pictures as compared with oral-only. These differences are most notable in terms of story grammar units, number of C-units, total number of words, and number of different words.
Clinical Implications
Narrative retells may be a useful clinical tool for exploring the language skills of 4-year-old preschool children Use wordless picture books along with an oral model Children from low-SES homes may perform more poorly as a result of lower language skills Potentially a quick tool to initially assessment and then monitor progress of narrative skills
THANK YOU!
Questions?
References
Bamberg, M., & Damrad-Frye, R. (1991). On the ability to provide evaluative comments: Further explorations of children's narrative competencies. Journal of Child Language, 18, 689-710. Bishop, D. V. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language impaired four year olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156-173. Boudreau, D. M. (2008). Narrative abilities: Advances in research and implications for clinical practice. Topics in Language Disorders, 28 (2), 99-114. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Fazio, B. B., Naremore, R. C., & Connell, P. J. (1996). Tracking children from poverty at risk for specific language impairment: A three year longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 611624. Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Quinn, R. (1993). Assessing narratives of children from diverse cultural/linguistic groups. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 24, 2-9. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes. Hymes, D. (1982). Narrative form as a" grammar" of experience: Native Americans and a glimpse of English. Journal of Education, 164 (2), 121-143. Justice, L. M., Bowles, R. P., Kaderavek, J. N., Ukrainetz, T. A., Eisenberg, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2006). The index of narrative microstructure: A clinical tool for analyzing school-age childrens narrative performances. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 177-191. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services. Manhardt, J., & Rescorla, L. (2002). Oral narrative skills of late talkers at ages 8 and 9. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 1-21. Mayer, M. (1977). Oops. New York: Dial Press.
References
McCabe, A. (1991). Preface: Structure as a way of understanding. In A. McCabe & C. Peterson (EDS.), Developing Narrative Structure (pp. i-xvii). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a childs narrative. New York: Plenum Press. McCabe, A., & Rollins, P. R. (1994). Assessment of preschool narrative skills. American Journal of SpeechLanguage Pathology, 3, 45-56. Peterson, C. (1994). Narrative skills and social class. Canadian Journal of Education, 19 (3), 251-266. Ripich, D. N., & Griffith, P. L. (1988). Narrative abilities of children with learning disabilities and nondisabled children: Story structure, cohesion, and propositions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 165173. Roseberry-McKibbin, C. (2008). Increasing language skills of students from low income backgrounds: Practical strategies for professionals. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing. Schneider, P. (1996). Effects of pictures versus orally presented stories on story retellings by children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5. 86-96. Schneider, P., & Dub, R. V. (2005). Story presentation effects on childrens retell content. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 52-60. Spinillo, A. G., & Pinto, G. (1994). Children's narratives under different conditions: A comparative study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 177-193. Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing, Vol. 2: Advances in discourse processing. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Wiig, E., Secord, W. A., Semel, A. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals PreschoolSecond Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.