Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CallAgendaHighlights
GivebackgroundontheRacialJusticeInitiative Articulatethelegalandsystemschangestrategy Addressquestions/concernssubmittedduringthe preteleconferencecommentperiod Fieldnewquestionsfromparticipants Discussnextstepsforfollowup
7/22/2009
Page 2 of 14
FormatoftheTeleconference
Guestspeakers p includeProfessor&CoAuthorEdgar g Cahn, CoAuthorCynthiaRobbins,ProfessorJoeTulman Allotherparticipantswillremainmutedthroughoutthecall unlesstheyrequesttospeak Participantsmayrequesttohavetheirphonesunmutedto question/comment i / by b pressing i 5*ontheir h i phone h keypad k d Duetothenumberofcallers,onlyoneparticipantatatime mayhavehis/herphoneunmuted Questionswillbeaddressedintheordertheyarereceived andastimepermits
7/22/2009
Page 3 of 14
TimeBanksUSABackground
TimeBanking,developedin1980byEdgarCahn,isanetworkfor people l to t exchange h ti timewith ithth their i neighbors i hb i inorder d t toserveth their i respectiveneeds,buildsocialcapital,andachievesystemschange. TimeBankingisin40statesand32countries. TimeBanks k USA( (TBUSA), ) f formed din1995,isaThink h k and dDoTank k forreweavingcommunity.TBUSAcreatednovelinnovationssuchas TimeDollarYouthCourt,alargescalediversionprogramfor arrestedyouthinWashington,DCandothercitieswhichgreatly reducesjuvenilerecidivism. TBUSAhashosted5internationalTimeBankingconferences.The mostrecentone one,inJune2009 2009,includedaColloquiumcalled DismantlingStructuralRacisminJuvenileJusticeandChildWelfare. TheColloquiumpubliclylaunchedTUBSAsRacialJusticeInitiative.
7/22/2009
Page 4 of 14
OverviewofTBUSAs RacialJusticeInitiative
In2008, ,Edgar g (Cahn) ( )securedap planning gg grantfromthe WKKelloggFoundationandbeganalandmarkeffortto addressstructuralracism,andrecruitedCynthia(Robbins) tocoleadtheeffort. effort TBUSAsRacialJusticeInitiativecombinesatargetedlegal theory h with i hTime Ti Bankings B ki coreprinciples i i l toaddress dd disproportionalityinjuvenilejustice,childwelfareand special p education. Thisteleconference,likethelawreviewarticle,AnOffer TheyCant Can tRefuse,focusesonjuvenilejustice.
7/22/2009
Page 6 of 14
7/22/2009
Page 7 of 14
LegalTheoryOverview
ThebasisoftheArticlesnewtheoryisauniqueapplicationinthe j juvenile il justice j ti and dEqual E lProtection P t ti context t tof fthe th Deliberate D lib t IndifferencestandardfromCityofCantonvHarris (1989) UnderCityofCantonvHarris,amunicipalitycanbeliableunder42 USC 1983onlywhereitspoliciescausetheConstitutional violation Onlyifamunicipalitys municipality spracticesevidencedeliberate indifferencetotherightsofitsinhabitantscansucha shortcomingbeproperlythoughtofasacitypolicyorcustom actionableunder42USC 1983(inthiscase,itwasafailureto t i its train it employees) l ) Municipalliabilityunder42USC 1983attachesif,andonlyif, citypolicymakersdeliberatelychooseapracticeorpolicyfrom amongvarious i alternatives lt ti
7/22/2009
Page 8 of 14
7/22/2009
Page 9 of 14
ProvingDeliberateIndifference
Afailurebypolicymakerstouseknowledgeabouteffective alternativestoincarcerationthatreduceDMCgivesriseto liabilityunder42USC 1983 Toprovedeliberateindifferenceforpurposesofaclaim under42USC 1983,aplaintiffmustdemonstrate:
Injury I j to t aright i htprotected t t dby b the th Constitution C tit ti orfederal f d llaw l Thattheinjurywasrelativelycertaintooccur Thatthegovernment governments scourseofactionwasoneselectedfromamong variousalternatives
7/22/2009
Page 10 of 14
APathtoProvingDeliberate Indifference d ff
Onceofficialsreceiveformalnoticeoftheraciallydisparate injurycausedbytheirpresentpracticeandnotice,aswell, oftheavailabilityofeffectivealternatives alternatives,the governmentscontinuationofthestatusquoconstitutes deliberateindifferenceandprovesintentfor42USC 1983 cases. cases juvenilej justicecontext, ,continuing gtoincarcerate Inthej youthofcoloratdisproportionateratesinsteadofusing moreeffective,lessexpensivealternativesconstitutes deliberate deliberateindifference. indifference
7/22/2009
Page 11 of 14
APathtoProvingDeliberate Indifference d ff
Toestablishdeliberateindifferenceinthej juvenilej justice context,AnOfferTheyCantRefuseproposesaPublic Hearingprocesstoputofficialsonformalnoticethat:
ThepresentsystemresultsindocumentedDMCthatviolatesthe Constitution; Theracialdisparityremainsevenwhenaccountingforallrace neutral factors; Injuriesflowfromthisdisparity,specificallyfromthe disproportionatelyhighdetentionandincarcerationratesforyouthof color but color, but,infact fact,ateverypointinthesystemyouthofcolorare subjectedtoharshertreatment; Highlyeffective,evidencebased,replicable,andlesscostly alternativeswouldsubstantiallyreduceDMC DMC.
7/22/2009
Page 12 of 14
7/22/2009
Page 13 of 14
NextSteps
Comments We W invite i it statements t t t of fsupport tfor f the th Initiatives I iti ti legal l land dsystems t changestrategy. Pleasesendanemailwithanysupportstatementor indicatingawillingnesstobecalledtodevelopabriefstatement to comments@racialjusticeinitiative.org comments@racialjusticeinitiative org Wealsoinvitecommentsonthelawreviewarticle,AnOfferTheyCant RefuseuntilJuly30,2009via comments@racialjusticeinitiative.org Actions Wouldyouoryourorganizationbeinterestedinhelpingtoorganizea publichearing p gtoaddressdisproportionality? p p y Doy youknowlegislators, g , judgesand/oradministratorswhomightbewillingtoconveneahearingto putofficialsonnotice?
7/22/2009
Page 14 of 14