Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Object #2: Listen carefully and make notes about things like style, instruments used etc.
Take a minute to write down what aspects of these two objects you see as similar.
Which one of our three ways to show triangles similar (AA, SAS, SSS) do you think shows these objects to be similar? Give a brief explanation in the space below.
Now, we are going to view some similar things that are not mathematical objects. In the spaces below, please make notes about how you see these objects as similar. Again, recall the three theorems about similarity (AA, SAS, & SSS). Keep these in mind as you look for factors that make these objects similar. Object #1: Watch carefully and make notes about things like style, instruments used etc.
Object #2: Watch carefully and make notes about things like style, instruments used etc.
Object #3: Watch carefully and make notes about things like style, instruments used etc. (This one may be silly)
Take a minute to write down what aspects of these objects you see as similar.
Which one of our three ways to show Triangles similar (AA, SAS, SSS) do you think shows these objects to be similar? Give a brief explanation in the space below.
After viewing the final video, ask yourself this: Would I have seen these things as similar before today? Why or Why not?
The grading rubric for each of these five criteria is located on the reverse side of this sheet.
Criteria # Score
1
This criterion is not present in the project. The description is weak and lacks use of a pictorial representation The description is weak and pictorial representations are included and/or description is average but lacks a pictorial representation. Description is average and includes pictorial representation or the description is strong, but lacks pictorial representations Description is strong and includes pictorial representations.
2
This criterion is not present in the project. The explanation is weak and lacks use of specific examples or details Some ideas are presented in a clear way but some are not. Few details may be included and some details may be missing. The ideas are presented in a clear way but some extraneous details may be included. The important ideas are presented in a clear, complete, accurate way with appropriate details.
3
This criterion is not present in the project. The explanation is weak and lacks use of specific examples or details Some ideas are presented in a clear way but some are not. Few details may be included and some details may be missing. The ideas are presented in a clear way but some extraneous details may be included. The important ideas are presented in a clear, complete, accurate way with appropriate details.
4
This criterion is not present in the project. The explanation is weak and lacks use of specific examples or details Some ideas are presented in a clear way but some are not. Few details may be included and some details may be missing. The ideas are presented in a clear way but some extraneous details may be included. The important ideas are presented in a clear, complete, accurate way with appropriate details.
5
This criterion is not present in the project. The explanation is weak and lacks use of specific examples or details Some ideas are presented in a clear way but some are not. Few details may be included and some details may be missing. The ideas are presented in a clear way but some extraneous details may be included. The important ideas are presented in a clear, complete, accurate way with appropriate details.
0 1 2 3 4
Category Score:
20