The Strategy The drama strategy of still image was one of seven strategies used in the five teaching

sessions for the Onion Tears plan. One 60-minute session, during which still image was the main strategy, is reported here to highlight how this technique enhanced critical reading of the beginning of the book. For more detailed information, I refer readers to Hertzberg (1997) for the complete drama sequence and Hertzberg (2000a) for a detailed report on findings. In what follows, first I explain the drama strategy and its implementation; the general procedures of showing, viewing, reflection, and de-roling used during any drama process are also explained. Second, a synopsis of the book and the purpose of the drama plan are provided. This is followed by the data analysis, with links to the theoretical underpinnings that inform both literacy and drama pedagogy to qualify points made. Prominence is given to the childrens voices through examples of their writing, drawing, and comments recorded as part of interviews. These demonstrate not only the childrens reaction to using drama as a teaching and learning activity, but also how they achieved a critical interpretation of the text. Preparing to Use the Strategy Still image is also referred to as frozen moment, depiction, or tableaux. It involves participants creating a still or frozen image with their bodies to portray a dramatic moment (see Figure 1 for examples). The analogy of a still photograph is useful when explaining this strategy to children. Photographs record something in time, depict an idea, or capture a dramatic moment. The meaning is conveyed using body language; in particular, facial expression, gesture, and body position. When explaining this strategy to children for the first time I use two photographs taken at a childs birthday party. One depicts the birthday child surrounded by friends and family, blowing out the candles on the birthday cake. This explains the notion of a moment in time. The other shows a child at the same party receiving a water bomb during one of the birthday games. This illustrates a dramatic moment. Figure 1 Children Performing Still Images

Before groups begin work on their still images, the exemplar (Figure 2) should be displayed on an overhead transparency. This helps to explain that when creating a still image, the drama elements to be emphasized are facial expression, gesture, posture, and placement in space (position, levels, and so forth). Figure 2 Overhead Transparency of Exemplar

Drama Language to Be Emphasized in a Still Image

STILL IMAGE

Emphasis on:

Body languagebody gesture and facial expression

Positionspace (eg. near or far) and levels (eg. sitting/standing) Then, to help students prepare their interpretations, I write the following questions on cardboard and display them prominently (where they remain for the duration of the drama activities). We call them the drama framework questions.

Who are we? (characters, roles) Where are we? (setting, context) What are we doing? (problem, tension) Why are we doing it? (focus, theme, issue) How will we show this? (body language, movement, mood)

I usually ask children to choose their own groups to work in, because this alleviates many management problems (Reid, 2002). Drama requires children to negotiate their ideas, and they are more likely to listen constructively and engage in give and take in this environment. At times, it is useful to suggest that one person in the group take notes as the others discuss their ideas.

It is crucial to allow enough time for planning, as this enables students to really explore and discuss their interpretation and, by implication, the issue or theme. However, it is equally important to encourage the students to get up and rehearse, as it is in the doing that most refinement occurs. Viewing A significant part of any drama is the viewing stage. Not only is it important to allow enough time for all of the groups to show their work to others, but this process also allows the class to see how the nuances in each groups performance make all interpretations slightly different -- an important part of critical literacy. However, if a group does not want to show its work, it should not have to. This reticence happens occasionally -- usually when a group does not feel it has finished its work to a satisfactory standard. I suggest that each group show its work in the space in the room where it has been rehearsing. This way they do not need to rearrange themselves or meet the demands of an unfamiliar space. As a group prepares to show its work, I ask the remaining children to close their eyes. One member of the performing group counts down from 3 and, on the count of 1, the audience opens its eyes to see the prepared still image. This is a useful procedure because the audience is not watching the preparation, but rather can focus on the still image itself. Reflection and De-rolling Reflection is the discussion phase, in which students present their thoughts about what they have learned and compare their experiences. Open-ended questions from the teacher are useful to begin these sessions. For example, one could ask, How do you think the still images reflected some major issues this excerpt addresses? De-rolling involves disengaging from the role that was taken on. This process is essential when a drama activity involves taking on a role that evokes strong emotions or thoughts for that person. Questions such as, You took on the role of the bully. How did you feel in that role? are appropriate. Often de-rolling occurs as part of the reflective discussion, as is evident in the examples that follow from the study. The distinction between the two may not be important for children, but teachers must be aware of it and ensure that both aspects are covered. For the discussion and de-rolling phase, it is preferable that the children and teacher sit in a large circle (often called the drama circle), so that eye contact can be made among all speakers. I always sit on the floor with the children to diminish the power or status effect. It is also important that all children have ample opportunity to speak their thoughts. For this reason, I have found whole-class discussion desirable when beginning to address key issues. I open the discussion and then go around the circle, giving each child an opportunity to say something. In this way, all children (and not just the more gregarious) have an opportunity to talk. If children do not want to participate at that moment, they say pass and the next person has a turn. I avoid giving any opinions during these sessions, so that children are not tempted to give responses they think I want to hear. After this we often break into friendship groups of about six for further discussion, or children write their thoughts in their reflective drama journals. This session often leads naturally to other activities, such as retelling of the story from the point of view of another character.

Using Drama in a Critical Reading of Onion Tears In Diana Kidds Onion Tears, a Vietnamese refugee girl, Nam-Huong, arrives in Australia without her immediate family. She lives with an adopted aunt and attends the local school, where her reticence about joining in or talking to the other children is misunderstood. Although this book is based on circumstances surrounding the migration process experienced by many refugees from Vietnam and a major focus is cultural difference, it is universal themes of isolation, identity, friendship, betrayal, and emotional abuse that are highlighted in the story. The purpose of the drama sequence in this part of the study was for children to make links between reality and fiction by using strategies that engaged them in making explicit and implicit connections between their own lives and the story world (Booth, 1994; OToole & Dunn, 2002). This was intended to help them read and interpret the recurrent themes of displacement and cultural difference more critically. First, I read from the beginning of the book to page 14. At the same time, the following excerpt from the text was displayed on an overhead transparency: Everyone at school keeps asking me what my name means. Does it mean princess? Mary says. COCONUT! Tessa shouts. Butterfly! Dragon! They all try and guess. I know, says Danny. It means DIM SIM! But I just shake my head. One day Ill tell them what it means. My Mum loved my name. She said it was very special. (Kidd, 1989, p. 9) The children then formed friendship groups of four to make a still image of this scene, assuming the roles of Nam-Huong, Danny, Tessa, and Mary. Each group worked through the showing, viewing, reflection, and de-roling stages. Examples of their still images are shown in Figure 3. It is interesting to see how each group interprets the scene in slightly different ways. Note also how the language of drama (facial expression, gesture and posture, space and levels) communicates the meaning.

Figure 3 Still Images of a Scence from Onion Tears

Findings The excerpt from the text quoted above was selected for children to unpack because it is the first critical event in the book to address the recurrent themes of isolation and identity. By selecting the excerpt I was controlling the content to be analyzed, and there was the risk that childrens responses could be of the guess what the teacher wants to hear variety. However, for children to have the opportunity to read Onion Tears critically, these themes do need to be highlighted. Selecting this passage for the still image strategy presented one way of doing so without explicitly directing or stressing the intent in a the way that a discussion might. In interviews, students noted that they learned more by doing drama than they did in whole class discussions. As Rachel put it, students can improve understanding of the book a little bit through discussion activities, but not that much because youre not in that position -- youre just talking about it.

It was clear to students that this scene was a portrayal of emotional abuse, but through assuming roles and then planning the still image, they were able to explore the physical nuances that contribute to the development of both the characters and the themes. Students not only analyzed the authors meanings, but they brought to the text their own voices and experiences. Using drama and, by implication, paralinguistics as a means for interpreting a point of tension, helped because children were able to represent more than they would be able to communicate through words alone (Neelands, 1999, p. 19). The following comments from various audio and video interviews are representative of the classs view about still image: Bill: Yeah, acting out that character, like, it makes you feel like you are them. You know more about the character. Jake: You can understand it, cause youre the one whos, like, in the shoes sort of. And youre the one whos doing it, so you understand it. Kate: You can use as much body and facial expression as you want to, so people watching us can see who our characters are.... By the expression on your face and the way youre sitting and moving around, people can tell how you feel. John: Because it, like, helps you in reading, writing. Helps you understand heaps of stuff that you never understand, as well as if you dont do drama. Usually, like, when you read books, you dont understand it but when youre doing drama you understand why theyre feeling and how. Luke: [I like still image] cause I like working in groups.... Its, like, interesting to hear all the ideas that other people have, and you learn to cooperate and combine your ideas with theirs. Students also indicated that they reread the text to delve more deeply into the meaning. Of interest was the amount of discussion about the roles of Mary and Tessa that this rereading prompted. By page 14 of the oral reading of the book, students were aware that Mary was trying to include Nam-Huong, but they were not quite as sure about Tessas intentions. The following discussion, which took place in one group of four boys who were in the process of planning their still image, illustrates their interpretation of meaning through attention to linguistic form: Chris: Yeah, but Mary was asking her to come bike riding, remember. So she is nice. Tim: What about Tessa? Chris: I dont know. Sam: Hey, but look: Coconut is in capitals, so shes shouting at her. I dont think thats nice. [The group moves closer to read the text on the overhead transparency.] Chris: Yeah, and princess is nicer than saying coconut or dragon.

The group then began positioning itself and decided that Nam-Huong would be seated toward the front, with Mary nearest to her because she was trying to be kind. Tessa was positioned further away, whilst Danny was placed furthest away and stood in an upright and aggressive posture. In the viewing and reflection stages, this was discussed further. At this stage, students are taken out of the action of the plot and into the action of the theme (Morgan & Saxton, 1988, p. 36). We viewed each groups still image and discussed what it was saying. From their comments, it was evident that children were attending to both the drama and the English teaching and learning focus by using reflective processes. In particular, the children were attending to the multiple interpretations each individual brings to a reading of a text. As Ned said, I really liked watching everybody else...to see what interpretation they have of it. Although there is a distinction between reflection and debriefing, often the two are intertwined. This was the case with this use of still image. After several children had made comments on the drama process itself and the meanings they were portraying, students were asked to contemplate how they felt in their particular role or to give their opinions on the messages being conveyed in their interpretations. In this session, it became apparent that many children were responding personally to the text, though from an as if because of the process of enactment. For example, Clive said, Like, if you were Nam-Huong, youd feel really sad. It is significant that Clive rarely volunteers his thoughts in larger groups. I encouraged him to continue by asking, Researcher: How did you feel [as Nam-Huong]? Clive: Sad. [pause] I didnt actually feel sad, but I acted sad. This gave Clive the opportunity to put the situation into the past tense. Whether he felt sad or just acted sad was something that only Clive knew, but the drama did seem to give him a role to speak. Within the protection of that role, he could express an opinion in front of his peers that he may not have felt comfortable about in other circumstances. That is, he could either pretend or clarify in front of peers how he felt (real life) by being in role as Nam-Huong (fictional context). Furthermore, it might be that he responded quickly because drama helped him form his thoughts. As he said later in the interview, [Its] good to act out...so you just dont talk about it. You can just, like, do it, so you can like actually do more about it. Like, you can act it out more and you can do more than talk.... Because when youre just talking about it, youre just talking about it -- youre not actually doing anything, youre just sitting there and talking. But when youre acting, youre standing up and doing something, so it gives you more opinion [about] what youre doing. Its more interesting to do things like that. As well, children justified the positions of various characters and events within the book. Although all children felt Dannys actions were inappropriate, the actions of Mary (particularly) and Tessa were another matter, as indicated in these comments: Clara: Mary wasnt being mean. She was just calling her a princess and

butterfly -- nice things which isnt mean, and compared to Danny.... Well, Danny could get in trouble for teasing her and if he was her he wouldnt like it. Rob: Clara said Mary was being nice by saying she was a princess but she was being sarcastic by saying oh well, shes a princess In terms of critical literacy, this discussion is interesting. Multiple interpretation of meaning is acceptable because individuals respond to a text based on their own unique experiences and sociocultural background (Campbell & Green, 2003). This scene comes at the beginning of the book, so both viewpoints are feasible and important because the issue continues to be prominent throughout the text. Dannys character and the concept of bullying in general were also explored. The discussion provided evidence that many children were moving beyond surface impressions to discover and penetrate the deeper meaning of the issues both in the book and in their own situations. In response to one childs comment that Danny was a bully, almost all children wanted to give reasons as to why children bully. The links between fiction and reality were evident in this session, as the following comments demonstrate: Rachel: I reckon that bullies reckon theyre tough, but theyre not really tough. Like, they reckon they are so good and everything, but theyre not really good. I bet you theyre scared inside, but they want to be really tough like some other people who are tough, so they bully other people to make them feel down and out and to make them[selves] look really tough.... I reckon he [Danny] was just showing off in front of the other girls like Tessa, and just trying to make other people feel bad to make him feel good about himself. Eloise: Well, usually bullies pick on people who are smaller or not as popular or whimpier...and they think that just because theyre bigger and taller -- and, like, Danny, hes the person.... Like, he has a normal name cause he comes from Australia so all the Australians probably think Dannys a normal name. But when they go [to Vietnam] Danny might be the weirdest name there. Debbie: If you think about it, really lots of kids do actually get put in the position that Nam-Huong is in every day at school. So really, there isnt much pretending for some kids. At this stage, the drama seemed to move from the text itself to a point of metaxis. It was then that Mirelli said that she thought the drama seemed to give the participants a voice to speak, both in terms of their own experiences and those of the characters in the book. After this reflection and de-roling session, children returned to their desks and were asked to consolidate and reflect on their learning by doing the following for their drama journal: Draw your groups still image and write the names of the characters underneath each figure. Write who you were by writing me underneath that character. Write what each of the

characters said in a speech bubble. Write what you think the characters were thinking in a thought bubble. Figure 4 is representative of the childrens responses to this activity. Figure 4 Izrams Drawing of Still Image Scene

During this activity, Mirelli alerted me to Izrams work. Izram was learning English as an additional language. Mirelli wanted to show me the detail in his drawing, because she said she had already noted how engaged he had been in the drama activity. He is a bright child, but [in previous book response sessions, he] usually just sits there and Im never sure how much he understands or what he thinks. But now, after this session, I could see that he was understanding, she recorded in her field notes.

Of interest, for example, is the drawing of a skateboard and ball alongside Danny. The book does not say that Danny does either of these activities. When asked why he included these items, Izram said he thought Danny was the sort of kid whod do those things.

Conclusion Izrams viewpoint demonstrates one of the fundamental aspects of critical literacy. He is transacting with the text and delving below surface impressions to scrutinize the character. In so doing, he brings his own social and cultural context to explain the meaning for him. It cannot be known whether the same depth of understanding would have happened without the preceding drama activity in which he had engaged. Nevertheless, he did participate in this drama, and it was evident that Izram understood the deeper meaning of this excerpt. Understanding this excerpt from Onion Tears was important so that the character development of these protagonists could be better understood as the story continued. The above drama session helped in this process and illustrates how such activities can precede talking, listening, reading and writing activities or be interwoven with them. Drama does not need to be an add-on, an if there is time to do it retell role-play undertaking. The power of metaxis through enactment that aids in connecting the real world to the fiction of the book is the unique quality that process drama can bring to a critical reading of a text. By making personal connections to events in the book, children can more deeply explore issues both within and beyond their immediate lives. Furthermore, the protection of being in role allows many children to feel they have a role to speak. Children can debate and challenge their own thoughts and the thoughts of others from an as if stance. As one child said after participating in the drama activity, They might be being bullied in the story and the same things happening to you, so theres a link between reality and fiction.