Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Memo
For this next project I intend to respond to a sir Ritchie King who interviewed a Kenneth foster that works for IEEE. I also am a little confused about whom to respond to, is it the author of the article or is it is the person interviewed by the author of the article? I want this response to take the form a newspaper article or magazine article, but something that is definitely a paper source. As for which magazine I am not totally sure which would be better Prevention or health and wellness? I think both sources are equally as good of a host. The audience in this case will likely be women or the elderly since those are who read magazines mostly now. Although I guess it would be possible for a much larger audience if they put the article online as well. I want to respond to this article since this lead me to question about the legitimacy of some of this stuff they call science, better known as junk science. My purpose for writing this piece is to understand more about the research thats going into this issue and whether or not it is a flawed research program or not, also to spread my opinion in hopes to get others thinking and questioning about it as well.
Comment [V2]: I would make this a new sentence.
their concern for the topic, or to show the public that they are a part of the solution rather than the problem. For example the research company ICNIRP that works conjointly with the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) has achieved labeling electromagnetic fields as a class 2 carcinogen. A class 2 is extremely bad since they are almost a class 1 right? Wrong. Actually a class 2 is classified only to have a possibility of being carcinogenic with no direct links to being the root cause. A few other examples of a class 2 carcinogen is coffee, lead, and titanium among several others. So how likely is it that this research is trustworthy and should it be taken to heart for its suggestions? I would most certainly not rely on their statements to be the complete truth to what their research found, whether in a good way or a bad way. Instead I would view them more as advice to what might be a possibility and try to steer away from talking on the phone for prolonged amounts of time. As well as stay current on the research, and decide for myself whether or not the research was biased or flawed in any way. If the research is flawed then my next step would be to determine the magnitude of this flaw, from this I could then finally determine the reliability of the source and information. .
Comment [V7]: You need to add a works cited to the paper to see the sources as well as page numbers with your last name. Comment [V6]: Work on in text citations for your information so people know where it comes from.