Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0
in Advancing Democracy, Human Rights
and Other U.S. Global Interests
Impact, Technology and Applications
Joel Postman
Chief Enterprise Social Media Strategist, Intridea
Author of “SocialCorp: Social
Media Goes Corporate”
The Role of Mobile Web 2.0 in Advancing Democracy, Human Rights
and Other U.S. Global Interests
Impact, Technology and Applications
Introduction
Mobility, once available only to senior officials and on-call staff in
communications and other disciplines, has become pervasive due to a
number of factors, expanding greatly the viable applications for this
technology. This report will help communications managers, business
strategists and end users understand Mobile Web 2.0; the advances in mobile
technology and Web 2.0 that have converged to bring about the latest wave
of mobile computing; its availability to a broader user base; and some of the
mobile applications currently in use in the advancement of democracy,
human rights, and related fields.
Advances in Mobility
Ten years ago, a mobile computing strategy might have included a few niche
applications running on proprietary, purpose-built devices, like handhelds
designed for inventory taking or data collection, or a fleet of laptops for field
support people. The high cost of hardware and accompanying software
development limited applications to those that were either mission critical,
like security and compliance, or those that generated direct revenue. Mobile
devices, in the form of handheld computers, ranged from $1500 to $3000 or
more, and in most cases required expensive, proprietary development
environments, making it costly and difficult to create and deploy new
applications and functionality.
So-called “smart” mobile phones and 3rd Generation (3G) devices offer the
integration of Short Message Service (SMS) for text messaging, and
Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), to allow bi-directional sending and
receiving of files, still images, flash animations, audio, archival video and
streaming video, for a rich, dynamic and highly useful user experience.
At the same time, the devices have become smaller and lighter, and cost less
to own and operate than they have in the past. Most of these mobile devices
are now available for under US $300.
Ideally, users of Mobile Web 2.0 should be able to interact with a set of
services, perform the same tasks, and retrieve the same kind of information
regardless of what mobile device they are using. A company or
organization’s regular web site can be adapted for viewing on mobile
devices, but it is not automatic. Mobile Web sites can be developed that
detect the type of device accessing them and present the user with an
appropriately scaled version of the site, with a user interface adapted to the
user’s particular platform. This is dynamic, and generally requires no user
intervention, vastly simplifying mobile access to Web-based information and
services.
Since there are many mobile platforms and hardware types, there are other
factors developers must consider. Some of these include adapting to varying
screen sizes (resolutions), JavaScript and Flash support, etc. Often users do
not have access to a high speed data connection, so complex screens may not
load quickly, requiring changes to the user interface in the mobile
environment. Limits to bandwidth, along with the reduced processor power
and memory availability in the typical handheld platform as compared to a
desktop or notebook computer, require that processes be kept compact so as
not to impact performance in a way that limits utility to the end user.
For example, the typical desktop or laptop does not have a touchscreen,
while the mobile device might. There are also graphical considerations.
Complex, high resolution graphics, which might make a regular Web site
more visually interesting, might be nothing more than a nuisance on a
mobile device. Information also needs to displayed differently, to allow the
mobile user to navigate efficiently in a small screen space. This might
involve splitting complex web pages into multiple mobile Web pages.
Exane BNP Paribas and Arthur D. Little forecast “As consumer demand for
mobile broadband services reaches critical mass - telecom operators can
expect that 50 percent of the European population will access the internet
through broadband on their mobile phones by 2012”2
Not all Moble Web 2.0 “applications” benefit the public good. Mobile
phones were used to encourage insurrection after a rigged election in Kenya
in 2007. “On January 1, 2008, as word spread throughout Kenya that
incumbent presidential candidate Mwai Kibaki had rigged the recent
presidential election, text messages urging violence spread across the
country and tribal and politically motivated attacks were perpetrated
throughout Kenya.
The Web proved the great equalizer in this story, however, and when “the
violence escalated out of control… a group of Kenyans … (launched) an
online campaign to draw local and global attention to the violence taking
place in their country. Within weeks they had documented in detail hundreds
of incidents of violence that would have otherwise gone unreported, and
received hundreds of thousands of site visits from around the world,
sparking increased global media attention.”3
3
Digitally Networked Technology in Kenya's 2007-2008 Post-Election Crisis, Harvard
University, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, September 29, 2008
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/node/4703
4
Estonia to vote by mobile phone in 2011, Associated Press, December 12, 2008
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28197990/
5
Kenyan Agricultural Commodity Exchange
http://www.kacekenya.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=
26
6
Mobile Phones to Serve as Doctors in Developing Countries, ReadWriteWeb, February
20, 2009
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mobile_phones_to_serve_as_doctors_in_develop
ing_countries.php and http://www.unfoundation.org/global-issues/technology/mhealth-
report.html
7
Dimagi HIV Mobile Decision Support http://www.dimagi.com/content/hiv-support.html
8
White Paper on Mobile Web for Social Development, World Wide Web Consortium,
December, 2006 http://www.w3.org/2006/12/digital_divide/ajc
9
Mobile and Wireless communications - An opportunity for Emerging Markets in Europe
and Community Level Action, European Union’s Mobile Cooperation and Coordination
Action, February 2005 www.ovum.com/mocca/content/tt3/record.pdf
10
IBM kicks off universal translator, mobile soul removal, Mobile Industry Review,
April 28, 2008
http://www.mobileindustryreview.com/2008/04/ibm_kicks_off_universal_translator_mob
ile_soul_removal.html
Conclusion
Whether by improving the crop prices realized the farmer in Kenya,
guaranteeing that every vote is counted in an election in Zimbabwe, or by
gathering critical information to help treat the AIDS patient in South Africa,
Mobile Web 2.0 has already proven to be the great democratizer, affording
the world’s citizens a level of participation in the democratic process and
access to information and services unparalleled in our history.
About Intridea
Intridea is a full service developer of Enterprise 2.0 applications, services,
and technologies. The company offers design, development and strategy for
large companies, government organizations, non-governmental
organizations and non-profits wishing to implement and make the most of
social media in communications, collaboration and other areas of their
business.
Intridea, Inc.
1875 I St. NW Suite 520
Washington, D.C. 20006
Viq Hussain
Senior Partner, Intridea
viq@intridea.com
443.838.7106