Feasibility Report For S.T.R.I.V.E. PROJECT

Feasibility Study
2013 March
County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster

Relocation of Business Resource Center
CSArch Project No. 413-12-01 CS
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 SECTION 7 SECTION 8 SECTION 9 SECTION 10 APPENDICES
Introduction and Executive Summary Space Inventory Space Requirements Summary Architectural Concept Building Systems Summary Code Analysis Evaluations of Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment Conceptual Project Budget Logistical Planning and Scheduling Summaries of Design-Build and Project Labor Agreements
A B C
Existing Floor Plans Meeting Minutes Proposed Design
Feasibility Study March 2013
County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center
Introduction and Executive Summary
SECTION 1
The County of Ulster and SUNY Ulster have retained CSArch to provide a Feasibility Study for the CS relocation of Ulster County Community College satellite campus from the Business Resource Center (BRC) located on One Development Court in Kingston, NY to Sophie Finn Elementary School, 94 Marys Avenue, in the city of Kingston.
PROJECT TEAM
The following team of professional consultants participated in preparing this report: Architect/Engineer CSArch Architecture | Engineering | Construction Management CS 40 Beaver Street Albany, NY 12207 www.csarchpc.com Site/Civil Engineer Weston & Sampson 22 High Street Rensselaer, NY 12144 Construction Service Consultant Turner Construction 374 Hudson Street Albany, NY 10014
A.
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed scope of work includes: Existing Building Condition Assessment Phase 1 Environmental Assessment (provided as a separate 200 page report entitled, Environmental Due Diligence Audit 02-02-2013) Code Evaluation Space Programming, Planning and Concept Design Evaluation of Existing Building Systems Logistical Planning and Scheduling Evaluation of Existing Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment Conceptual Project Budget Summaries of: o Design-Build o Project Labor Agreements o Construction Management at Risk The proposed scope of work includes rehabilitation and alterations, and a building entry addition to Sophie Finn Elementary School to accommodate SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center (BRC). Per semester, the BRC provides credited collegiate courses to nearly 600 in-county and out of county residents, and noncredited courses to another 1000+ students. Additionally, the BRC is the home of the certified SUNY Ulster Police Basic Training Program which provides full-time pre-employment police basic training to students in preparation to appointment in law enforcement.

1
Introduction and Executive Summary
SECTION 1
Minor reorganization of existing space is being proposed to address program needs, improve efficiency of current spaces, and improve overall aesthetics to create a collegiate environment. The alterations will correct noted code, life safety and ADA deficiencies as required, and replace outdated building systems with modern energy-efficient systems and equipment. Site improvements are being considered to accommodate current and projected student enrollment, staff and faculty. A proposed new main building entrance and parking area at the second story will accommodate 115 student parking spaces and provide a clear sense of arrival. A generous, welcoming entry lobby will telegraph student and faculty activity upon entry. In total, the site has the capacity to accommodate nearly 170 parking spaces, 55 of which will be located at the existing parking area on the lower level for faculty and staff. Police Academy Cadets could utilize the Kingston High School lower lot adjacent to the tennis courts, on the south side of Sophie Finn. The Kingston High School lower parking level on the north side of the building could be utilized for additional spill over parking. The proposed design schemes take advantage of the abundant naturally day-lit spaces and the overall open feel of the existing building. The new main entrance at the second floor brings visitors and students to the heart of the building upon arrival. The new entry lobby is situated between the two existing building wings with views looking out to the Catskills and south over the town of Kingston. The light filled space sits across from the main open stair and new building elevator providing direct access to the first floor. A detailed scope of work is further described in Sections 4 and 5.
B.
RESOURCES
This report is based upon observations made during walk-through surveys and meetings conducted by the project team lead by CSArch during January and February, 2013.
C. CONDITION OF FACILITY
Section 2 Space Inventory, describes the condition of the BRCs existing home on One Development Court. Section 4 Space Inventory, describes the construction and condition of the facility on 94 Marys Avenue. Existing floor plans of Sophie Finn are included as Appendix B.

2
Space Inventory Summary
SECTION 2
SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center currently resides in an Ulster County owned building on One Development Court, Kingston, NY. The one story office facility was once occupied by IBM until the mid 1990s when IBM closed its operations in Kingston. The building sits on a main thoroughfare and houses both Ulster County offices such as, County Office of Employment and Training, County Child Support Enforcement and Social Services. SUNY Ulsters BRC, the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) and several community programs run under the BRC are also housed at One Development Court. Though the building is of no architectural significance, its location has benefited enrollment as its located in the shopping district and along several bus lines. The BRC occupies nearly 20,000 SF of floor space. Spaces consist of classrooms ranging from approximately 600 SF to 950 SF, offices of 140 SF to 200 SF, a Continuing Education and Registrar Suite, and a Reception/Lobby space that is part of the buildings general reception and manned by a Security Guard. There is no true sense of Entry as a Security Guard acts as the greeter to all guests, and directional signage is lacking. The overall feel of the space suggests neither a place of higher educational learning nor a professional inspiring environment. Daylight is scarce and artificial lighting is poor. The organization of spaces seems to be based upon space availability throughout the building, and therefore, the BRC lacks identity.

3
Space Requirements
SECTION 3
The space program on the following page compares the BRCs current space utilization to the proposed layout at Sophie Finn. The program lists existing and required spaces, and respective square footages at the BRC in the both the existing facility and the proposed location at 94 Marys Avenue. The first column, Space Description, lists the current spaces in the BRC and spaces that the BRC may or may not occupy in the future. The second column is a list of existing spaces, square foot areas and the maximum number of occupants that utilize the space at the current location on One Development Court. The alternate design layout is reflected in the third column. This column provides the quantity of spaces and their respective square foot areas that will be provided in the relocation. Refer to Appendix C for alternate design layout drawings.

4
Space Requirements
SECTION 3

5
Architectural Design Concept
SECTION 4
Sophie Finn Elementary School, owned by the Kingston City School district, is a two story steel framed and bearing wall building with brick veneer constructed in 1962. Designed by Perkins and Will Architects, the buildings appearance is consistent with many elementary schools of its time. Sophie Finn is approximately 29,000 gross square feet and currently houses students from pre-k through grade 5. The basement floor occupies a small portion of the building and consists of the boiler room, an electrical room, storage and a custodial room totaling approximately1500 SF. Direct access to the exterior is available from all but one space, the electrical room. A spiral stair from a central core provides access to the basement from the interior. The remainder of the building is simply configured with two main single loaded corridors on both the first and second floors. A specials core which includes the Playroom, Library and Cafeteria, as well as the Main Office, sits at the crux of the two main wings and is linked by a central open stair. Daylight filters through the first and second floors from a two story glass wall system at the central stair. All classrooms are situated in building wings with abundant direct and indirect daylight. Classrooms are generally separated from the corridors with masonry walls and a vision panel between top of the wall and the ceiling providing a means of indirect daylight and a sense of openness. The understated Main Entrance is situated on the first floor off of Marys Avenue, across from St. Benedictine Hospital. A small parking lot serves faculty and staff at this location and provides a bus loop and student drop off drive. The Main Offices are situated directly off of the Main Entrance. The first floor of Sophie Finn houses mainly Pre-K and Kindergarten classrooms, the Cafeteria and the Main Offices, while the second floor provides classrooms for the remaining grade levels, the Library and the Playroom. The Playroom is flanked by Toilet Rooms, Locker Rooms and Showers that have been out of operation for some time. Though the building has not seen a major renovation project since its construction, it is generally in good condition. The most significant exterior component requiring improvements is the exterior window system which is single pane and original. Replacing the window system would provide an increase in the buildings energy performance; the payback period exceeds 15 years. The majority of architectural renovation and upgrades is needed in the building interiors on both the first second floors. While the building looks and feels like an elementary school, the simplistic layout and organization provides great opportunity to transform the building into a state of the art higher education facility. Renovations will include new ceiling systems and lighting, interior masonry wall treatment, new interior glass wall systems, wall paint and base, new flooring, new and existing doors, and a combination of new and relocated furniture. Toilet Rooms on each floor will be renovated to comply with ADA Standards for Accessible Design. New lavatories, water closets and urinals will be provided, and existing finishes including wall tile and floor tiles will be replaced. Components such as, hand dryer's, paper towel dispensers and mirrors will also be replaced. In general, Toilet Rooms will be refurbished to be ADA compliant, comfortable, and up to date. The design intent for entire facility, particularly the classrooms and main student spaces, includes clean, forward thinking spaces that promote interaction between students and faculty, and stimulate the desire to learn. Registrar, computer rooms and the student lounge/cafe will become more visible and welcoming engaging students and prompting them to utilize the spaces and services. Corridor walls will be resurfaced

6
Architectural Design Concept
SECTION 4
and/or rebuilt to provide an academic feel and allow for informal student/faculty meeting along the length of the corridor. To provide a larger, more accessible entrance and lobby, a proposed one story addition will be located on the second floor. A main parking lot will accompany the new entrance and provide parking for nearly 115 students, while the lower existing lot will provide 55 parking spaces for faculty and staff. The new transparent glass entrance addition will offer a more collegiate atmosphere. Upon entry, students will be presented with an open lobby with lounge seating to encourage informal meeting and discussion amongst students, faculty and staff. Through aptly appointed renovations, we strive to provide the BRC with a healthy and stimulating learning environment, and to achieve greater interest and engagement from students, staff, faculty and visitors. Consequently, through improving the overall environment and endowing a collegiate setting, proposed plans will strengthen the BRCs ability to positively impact students and attract perspective students whom may be considering continuing education.

7
Building Systems Summary
SECTION 5
I.
MECHANICAL
Existing Conditions A. The existing heating system is comprised of (2) cast iron, dual fuel (oil/natural gas) heating hot water boilers which were replaced in 2011. (De Dietrich Model 430-8A). The pumps and piping in the boiler room was replaced during the boiler upgrade however, the building distribution is original. B. Heating terminals include unit ventilators and finned tube radiation. Cooling is provided in the administrative areas by window air conditioning units. The Gymnasium and Cafeteria are served by indoor air handling units with hot water heating coils and outdoor air intake while most classrooms are ventilated by a unit ventilator with a wall mounted fresh air intake louver. Exhaust air was vented through louvered doors to roof mounted gravity ventilators located in the adjacent corridors. Unit ventilators were omitted from the original kindergarten classrooms. C. Water service is original 3 municipal connection serving domestic water and fire sprinkler system. Backflow preventer and water pressure booster pump were installed in 2011 due to poor water pressure. D. Underground fuel oil storage tank and monitoring system replaced in 2011. Heating A. The existing boilers are new and will be reused in the project however, new heating hot water distribution piping shall be provided. Cooling A. Provide the following: 1. A split system modular chiller, 100 tons nominal cooling capacity, with evaporators and compressors located in the 1st Floor Mechanical Room. 2. Refrigerant piping to roof mounted air-cooled condensers. 3. Chilled water circulation pump and distribution piping to unit ventilators, fan coils and air handling units, and condensate drainage piping from each terminal. Ventilation A. Provide roof mounted gravity relief ventilator for each classroom unit ventilator and a roof mounted centrifugal exhaust fans for toilet rooms and locker rooms. Air Handling Units A. The Physical Training Room and Fitness Classroom shall be served by separate indoor air handling units. B. A central air handling unit will be located in the 1st Floor Mechanical Room to provide ventilation and cooling to core areas including caf, open lab, and related support spaces. Refrigerant piping to roof mounted air-cooled condensers.
II.
III.
IV.
V.

8
SECTION 5
VI.
Terminal Units A. New unit ventilators with 2-pipe combination heating/cooling coil shall be provided for classroom spaces and conference rooms. B. Spaces not served by unit ventilators or air handling units such as corridors and main entry shall be conditioned by fan coil units with limited supply/return air ductwork. Outside air may be ducted to fan coil units where required. Controls/Building Automation: A. Remove original pneumatic control system including air compressor, control air tubing and control devices and provide web-based building automation system including digital controllers at each fan coil unit, unit ventilator and air handling unit. Integrate existing sensors in boiler room with proposed system. Plumbing A. Existing gas-fired wall mounted instantaneous type water heater shall remain and the original hot water storage tank shall be removed. Provide one 120 gallon factory insulated stainless steel storage tank. B. Provide new cold water, hot water and hot water recirculation piping systems to new plumbing fixtures. Piping larger than 1-inch shall be Type L copper and piping 1-inch and smaller shall be copper or PEX. C. Replace plumbing fixtures or provide new as required. Extend and connect to existing underground drainage piping, and provide new PVC sanitary waste and vent piping above ground. D. Replace original storm drainage piping above grade. Fire Protection A. Existing system covering the boiler room will remain. Because of low water pressure, opt to rate corridor walls in lieu of providing a full NFPA sprinkler system.
VII.
VIII.
IX.

9
SECTION 5
ELECTRICAL I. Power Systems

A. Normal Power Distribution System Description: 1. Utility: Currently the building is fed by a three transformer system located in a locked room near the boiler room exterior wall. Service to the building shall be upgraded hence the transformer system shall be replaced. A new pad-mounted 500KVA transformer will be coordinated with the utility company during the design phase. 2. Power distribution summary: The current service entrance is thru the exterior wall in boiler room (002). The conduits are routed into the electric room where the main service I-line, utility meter, meter cabinet and a second MDP (MDP-2) are located. The main distribution panel is 1200A rated, 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire. The panel has a 600-Amp main circuit breaker. As a result of intended change in occupancy and the addition of HVAC equipment in this building, the electrical load will increase. The existing 600-Amp service will not be sufficient to accommodate the new loads; therefore a service upgrade will be required. The anticipated new service shall be 1200-Amps, 3-phase, 4-wire. A new 500KVA pad mounted transformer shall be provided by the utility company. New feeders from the transformers secondary into the building electrical room shall be provided. The distance between the exterior wall where the service comes in and the location of the main panel appears to be greater than 10 ft., further code investigation will determine if a service entrance disconnect is required in the boiler room, prior to the feeders reaching the I-line main distribution panel. As part of the service upgrade, the branch panels shall also be replaced with new panels. The existing panels currently appear to be nearing the end of their useful life and a replacement at the time of the power distribution upgrade is recommended. The feeders for the panels may be salvaged for re-use. The affected panels are: BR-1, I, II, III, IV, PP1 and PP2. The main distribution panels MDP and MDP-2 may be re-used with the new service. A new main service 1200A circuit breaker matching the existing panel rating shall be provided in MDP I-line panel. 3. Interior Power Distribution: There is a number of branch circuit panels located throughout the building. MDP-2 is 600-Amp rated, main lug only (MLO) sub-distribution panel of MDP. Panel BR-1, which is 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire, 42-pole, MLO, is located in the boiler room. On the first floor, four (4) electrical panels are located in the maintenance room (111);panel I, 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire, 42-pole, MLO; panel II, 120/208V, 3phase, 4-wire, 24-pole, MLO; panel III 120/208V, 3-Phase, 4-wire, 42 pole, MLO; and panel IV 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire, 42-pole, MLO. The panels are located in a room near a sprinkler head. Upon further coordination with fire protection engineers, the panel or the sprinkler head shall be relocated. A second set of two (2) electrical panels is located on the second floor. These panels are PP1, 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire, 42-pole, MLO and panel PP2, 120/208V, 3-phase, 4-wire, 42-pole, MLO. None of the existing panels have a panel rating tag, therefore; the exact rating of each panel could not be determined at the time of the field visit. The breakers in the panels are Siemens style breakers. 4. Ratings: Short-circuit ratings and coordination is based on existing equipment. All short circuit ratings will be shown on the Drawings, 5. Branch circuits: Convenience perimeter power outlets will be provided as required in renovated rooms and existing rooms which require extra power. A field visit to document all existing devices and locations will help determine outlets necessary. Tamper-proof receptacles and AFCI (arc-fault circuit interrupter) breakers will be provided per current electrical codes.

10
SECTION 5
II.
Power for HVAC and Plumbing System: A. Coordination with mechanical and plumbing engineers will determine equipment to be disconnected for removal by electrical contractor. B. Preliminary coordination with mechanical scope indicates that significant mechanical equipment load (approx. 130KW) will be added to the building. Proper circuit breakers, feeders, disconnect and other necessary control devices shall be indicated in the drawings. Emergency Power for Fire Safety System: A. No existing emergency power generator is present in the facility. Currently the building does not include a fire protection system in which an electric fire pump would be required. An existing sprinkler system exist at the facility, however, it only covers a small area of the facility. B. A fire protection system including an electric fire pump is a viable option for this facility. If this approach is approved, an emergency generator will be required. The generator will be approximately 100-kW (400-Amps @ 208/120-Volt, 3-Phase) diesel or natural gas generator. This size generator will meet the fire pump requirement as well as provide some emergency power for the facility. The generator would consist of a dedicated feed to the electric fire pump, one feeder for life safety power (emergency lighting) and one feeder for standby power. Lighting: A. System Description: 1. The existing building lighting was recently retrofitted with surface mounted T5 fluorescent fixtures and motion detection in classrooms and corridors. High bay 5-lamp T5 fluorescent fixtures are present in the gym area. Switching in the facility is currently single switch with alb bi-fixture switching in classrooms. The retrofitted fixtures in the corridor are 1x4 surface mounted fixtures with prismatic lenses. The ceilings in most areas will be removed for architectural and mechanical work; hence fixtures will require to be replaced with efficient fixtures that also add to the esthetics of the space. 2. The new fixtures will be required to satisfy the new space requirements. i. All new lighting shall be fluorescent T8 or T5 depending on the application. ii. New fixtures shall meet IESNA recommended levels and controls. The interior luminaires shall utilize predominantly 120 volt high performance T8 program start electronic ballast with less than 10% harmonic distortion. iii. Central Hudson will be contacted to review if incentives are available as part of the lighting renovations and/or additions. Utility incentives tend to yield higher rebated than NYSERDA and shall be pursued first. iv. Initial interior illumination levels in foot candles (FC), will be aimed to be as follows: 1. Corridors: 10FC 2. Toilet Rooms: 10FC 3. Offices: 30FC 4. Class rooms: 40FC
III.
IV.
3. In general, lighting controls will be required and arranged according to new rooms and spaces.

11
SECTION 5
4. Existing emergency lighting is provided by wall mounted batter pack units which cover all means of egress. These battery packs appear to be older. Replacement with LED type emergency lighting units will prove more reliable. 5. Existing exit signs appear to have proper coverage and do not appear to require replacements. 6. Exterior Lighting System Description: Existing exterior lighting is very minimal. There exist two (2) wall pack units at the front of the school and one (1) on the back. It is proposed that additional LED exterior wall mount fixtures are added to improve the school perimeter lighting. In the new upper level parking lot, new exterior lighting will be required. The parking lot lighting shall utilize LED pole lighting to minimize energy use and maintenance costs while promoting pedestrian safety. In addition to base energy savings, another potential advantage to using LED system is that the system can optionally dim during periods of inactivity and increase upon motion detection to augment energy cost savings. If costs do not allow for the use of LED, pulse start metal halide would be used. In order to keep a secure area, building perimeter lighting shall be added to provide a lighting level of 1-2 foot candles (maintained). Basis of design is suggested as 20-foot poles for parking spaced at 70-feet centers and 15-foot building mounted lighting, spaced at 60-feet centers, Phillips Gardco GL18 (PSMH) and GL18-LED (LED). Building mounted lighting will be provided on all sides for security purposes. Separate emergency lights will be provided at all exterior egresses to meet Code. V. Fire Alarm A. System Description 1. The existing building is covered by a SAFECO ALARMS SYSTEMS Zone Fire Alarm panel located in the electric room. Smoke detector, fire alarm visual strobes and horn coverage throughout the school appears to be adequate for the school usage, but a more sophisticated system is required for an increased occupation. 2. It was requested during the time of the field visit, that a new Addressable Fire and LifeSafety System is provided at the facility. This system will incorporate fire alarm with audio notifications during not only fire emergencies, but any other emergency via a PA system. In addition to the audio notification capabilities, the panel will also include smoke detection, new entrance lobby fire alarm annunciator panel, and fire annunciation devices. Further investigation and coordination with the new facilitys staff will assist in selecting the proper panel for the facility. 3. Tamper and flow switches as required per code will be provided. 4. All fire alarm wiring will be plenum rated. 5. All devices will be designed to be located where they will meet ADA guidelines. Telecommunications A. System Description 1. Telephone and fiber optic cables enter the building in the basement. The service is located in the electrical room where the main distribution panel is located. Coordination with the
VI.

12
SECTION 5
colleges network department will determine exact locations of all new data and telephone locations. 2. Existing tel/data outlets will be removed as required in the renovated areas. New tel/data boxes will be provided as required to accommodate the renovation. 3. It is anticipated that box and conduit will be provided by electrical contractor while the college provides all necessary cables and connections. If the construction project requires that all data/telephone boxes, cabling and raceway to be provided, then, cabling system shall have a raceway system consisting of conduit in concealed inaccessible spaces and Jhooks for open wiring in accessible spaces for routing of the communications cabling from individual outlets leading to the local distribution frame per all EIA/TIA Standards. VII. Code Summary A. Preliminary building survey did not reveal any electrical code deficiencies that would require correction under this project. All new electrical work will be installed per all required codes and standards.

13
SECTION 5
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN APPROACH

The County of Ulster and SUNY Ulster have expressed their concern and responsibility to progress and building project, and provide a renovated campus environment that consciously minimizes its impact on the environment. Although the County of Ulster has mandated that new construction projects meet LEED Silver, this project is exempt from the mandate as it is a major renovations project and not a new construction project. The project however, will indeed implement LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations without necessarily seeking certification. Our proposed design practices include many sustainable measures that may also qualify for LEED points as defined by the 2009 New Construction and Major Renovations checklist. The following list of examples, include some of the measures being considered for the BRC: Occupancy sensors to control heating and ventilation reducing energy demand and increasing occupant comfort Motion sensor lighting control reducing lighting demand and increasing occupant comfort Daylight activated lighting controls reducing lighting demand Low flow fixtures reducing water usage Energy efficient windows reducing heating and cooling demands as well as increasing occupant comfort Pervious paving and native plant landscape elements reducing stormwater runoff, irrigation demand, and improving sustainability of the site Bicycle storage, changing rooms, and shower facilities encouraging alternative transportation means for building occupants A preliminary LEED 2009 New Construction and Major Renovations check list is provided on the following page. Though certification is not being sought, LEED Certified designation is within reach.

14
LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations

Project Checklist
7
Y
SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Feb.22, 2013
5
?
2
N
Sustainable Sites
Prereq 1 Credit 1
Possible Points: 26
Y ? N
Materials and Resources, Continued

2 1 1 14 1 Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3
Credit 4
Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 Y 2 4 1 Y Y Y 1 4 30 2 2
Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8
Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Site Selection Development Density and Community Connectivity Brownfield Redevelopment Alternative TransportationPublic Transportation Access Alternative TransportationBicycle Storage and Changing Rooms Alternative TransportationLow-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Alternative TransportationParking Capacity Site DevelopmentProtect or Restore Habitat Site DevelopmentMaximize Open Space Stormwater DesignQuantity Control Stormwater DesignQuality Control Heat Island EffectNon-roof Heat Island EffectRoof Light Pollution Reduction
1 5 1 6 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
Credit 5 Credit 6 Credit 7
Recycled Content Regional Materials Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood
1 to 2 1 to 2 1 1
Indoor Environmental Quality

Prereq 1 Prereq 2 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 Credit 5 Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8.1 Credit 8.2
Possible Points: 15
Water Efficiency
Prereq 1 Credit 1
Possible Points: 10
2 to 4 2 2 to 4
2 2
Credit 2 Credit 3
Water Use Reduction20% Reduction Water Efficient Landscaping Innovative Wastewater Technologies Water Use Reduction
Energy and Atmosphere

Prereq 1 Prereq 2 Prereq 3
Possible Points: 35
Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Increased Ventilation Construction IAQ Management PlanDuring Construction Construction IAQ Management PlanBefore Occupancy Low-Emitting MaterialsAdhesives and Sealants Low-Emitting MaterialsPaints and Coatings Low-Emitting MaterialsFlooring Systems Low-Emitting MaterialsComposite Wood and Agrifiber Products Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control Controllability of SystemsLighting Controllability of SystemsThermal Comfort Thermal ComfortDesign Thermal ComfortVerification Daylight and ViewsDaylight Daylight and ViewsViews
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 14 7 2 2 3 2 1
Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4 Credit 5 Credit 6
Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems Minimum Energy Performance Fundamental Refrigerant Management Optimize Energy Performance On-Site Renewable Energy Enhanced Commissioning Enhanced Refrigerant Management Measurement and Verification Green Power
Innovation and Design Process

Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credit 1.4 Credit 1.5 Credit 2
Possible Points: 6
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 to 19 1 to 7 2 2 3 2
Innovation in Design: WEc3 Exemplary Performance Innovation in Design: Specific Title Innovation in Design: Specific Title Innovation in Design: Specific Title Innovation in Design: Specific Title LEED Accredited Professional
11 2 Y 3 1 2 1
Materials and Resources

Prereq 1 Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 2
Regional Priority Credits

Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2
Possible Points: 14
1 1 to 3 1 1 to 2 1 to 2 1 1 42 16 40
Credit 1.3 Credit 1.4
Possible Points: 4
Credit 3
Storage and Collection of Recyclables Building ReuseMaintain Existing Walls, Floors, and Roof Building ReuseMaintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements Construction Waste Management Materials Reuse
Regional Priority: Brownfield Redevelopment (SSc3) 1 Regional Priority: Stormwater Design- Quantity (SSc6.1) 1 Regional Priority: Heat Island Effect - Roof (SSc7.2) 1 Regional Priority: Building Reuse - Maintain Existing Walls, Floors, and1
Total
Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points
Possible Points: 110

Platinum 80 to 110
15
Code Analysis
SECTION 6
A.
SUMMARY
The required codes reviewed for this project are as follows: Building Code of New York State Plumbing Code of NYS Mechanical Code of NYS Fuel Gas Code of NYS Existing Building Code of NYS NFP 45: Standard on Fire Protection for Laboratories Using Chemicals Energy Conservation Construction Code of NYS NYS Labor Department Industrial Code ADA: ANSI 117.1, latest edition Code compliance documentation as follows, is provided for preliminary review purposes: SUCF Design Services Code Review Project Title Construction Permit Application Project Summary Existing Building Code Summary Code Compliance Summary Structural Design Summary Energy Conservation Code Summary
B.
DISCUSSION
The building has 2 floor levels but is in- effect one story since both levels exit directly to grade. There are 2 intercommunicating stairs. As a 2 story type 2B occupancy, no sprinkler system is required. Corridors serving over 30 persons are required to have a one hour rating. The existing corridors are not rated. Rated walls and doors will be provided. An elevator will be provided for interior access. Many existing doors are deficient for ADA access because of width or approach space. These will be brought into compliance as necessary. Handicapped accessible toilets will be provided for men and women on each floor level. Ventilation requirements of ASHRE will be brought into compliance by the addition of a new air conditioning system. A small addition at the entrance will be provided. It will be one story, type 2b construction, and fully code compliant. Storm water standards will be met by incorporating porous pavement and underground storage.
C. ENFORCEMENT
The code will be enforced by the city of Kingston if SUNY Ulster leases the building. If the County purchases the building, it will be enforced by the County. Annual fire inspections will be performed by the State.

16
SUCF DESIGN SERVICES CODE REVIEW

For instructions see the second Tab below.
State University Construction Fund

Office of Design and Construction Management 353 Broadway, Albany, New York 12246 Tele: (518) 320-3200 Fax: (518) 689-2635
Schematic Phase Design Manual Phase Pre-Bid Phase

Check One
SUCF PROJECT NO.: PROJECT TITLE: Campus: Consultant: Consultant's Address
DATE:
County of Ulster-SUNY Ulster Relocation BRC to Sophie Finn SUNY Ulster - Satellite Campus - Business Resource Center CSArch 40 Beaver Street, Albany, NY 12207
3/1/13
Contact Name:
B Manning
SUCF Project Coordinator:
Variance Required:
Yes (Attach copies)
No
Comments are accessible by placing the cursor over the red triangle, right click and select edit to read or copy the comment.
Building Name(s):
Sophie Finn
Project Type:
New Building(s)
Existing Building(s)
Site Work Only
Other -
small addition
Cooperating Agency involvement

Are any buildings involved over 50 years old? (SUCF Directive 1C-9) Yes No Yes No Is the work subject to NYS DEC review? SEQR: SPDES Permit Yes No Yes No Yes No Sanitary effluent Wet Lands Air Permit Yes No Yes No Fuel Tank Is the Work subject to NYS DOH review? Kitchen Septic System Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Swimming pool Water Treatment Facility Sanitary Discharge Yes No Is the Work subject to NYS OCFS review? (Day Care) Is the work subject to NYS DOT, Army Corps of Engineers, Adirondack Park Agency, or any Yes No New York City Agency review? Have the local Water and Health Department Authorities been consulted? Has the Campus Environmental Health and Safety Officer been consulted?
Yes Yes No No
Yes
No
not applicable not applicable
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION

(For submission with Pre-Bid Phase Documents.) Project Description:
SUCF Certification Letter(s) of the Sub-consultant(s) is (are) Attached: Code Conformance Drawings are Attached: (Reduced Size) Statement of Special Inspections is Attached:
Yes Yes Yes
Submitted Previously Submitted Previously Submitted Previously
To the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the construction documents for this project are in conformance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and all other applicable Federal and State Laws and regulations, all as currently amended. Name of Person Signing for the Consultant:
(Typed or Printed)
Signature NYS RA or PE number
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Two
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Information:
Project Type:
New Building Existing Building Site Work Only Other-
small addition
R-2 Other U
Building Information:
Use and Occupancy Classifications: (check all that apply)
B AE M I-2 I-4 S-1 S-2
Type of Construction: (check all that apply) Indicate multiple types of construction on the Code Compliance Drawings. Existing building(s): I-A I-B II-A II-B III-A III-B IV New building(s) & Additions: I-A I-B II-A II-B III-A III-B IV
V-A V-A
V-B V-B
Building Height and Area for New Buildings and Additions: (If additional space is needed, provide this on the Code Compliance Drawings.) 23,000 55 4 Allowable (BC Table 503): Height in feet: Number of stories: Square feet / floor* Actual: Height in feet: 17
No
Number of stories:
Yes, full Yes, partial
Square feet / floor*

Yes, in new construction only
12000
* Provide calculations on the Code Compliance Drawing when the areas and heights are modified and increased (BC Sections 504 & 506).
Is a Sprinkler System provided?
CODE CONFORMANCE DRAWINGS

For All Projects (*excluding site, and roof projects.
For other exclusions, discuss with the SUCF Project Coordinator.)
NA* list Code Conformance Drawing numbers
Information provided on Code Conformance Drawings: Occupancy Classification Yes Yes Construction Classification - Existing Yes Construction Classification - New Yes Key Plan with building sides accessible Yes Building Areas Yes Fire Walls Yes Fire Barriers Yes Incidental Use Area Fire Ratings
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Egress Information: Yes Room Use Designations Yes Room Square Footages Yes Room Occupancy Loads Yes Room Exit & Corridor Exit Width Calculations Yes Exit Travel Distances including Common Paths Yes Stair & Exit Door Exit Width Calculations Yes Accessibility for Exist and New Fire rated Corridor/Exit Enclosures (SUCF Directive)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
(Provide numbered Building Areas (existing and new), construction types (if more than one), number of stories, and number of sides accessible. Provide the gross sq. ft. size of each floor if the floor consists of multiple Building Areas. Show locations of fire walls and fire barriers.)
NA (only for areas associated with or affected by this Occupant Load: project) Include assembly spaces that change as a result of this project and exits effected by the change
EXISTING BUILDING CODE SUMMARY

list drawing(s) or specification section(s)
For Existing Buildings check all that apply:

not applicable (skip this group) Repair
Alteration Level 1 * Change of Occupancy
Alteration Level 2 * Addition*
Alteration Level 3 * Historic Building Relocation
* Provide Key Plans demonstrating distinct work areas on Code Compliance Drawings.
Structural: Yes not applicable Roofing Replacement Structural Analysis Yes not applicable Roofing Diaphragm Analysis Yes not applicable Structural Alteration Analysis and Seismic Retrofit Yes not applicable Parapet Bracing Yes not applicable Addition to existing Building loads or drifting snow loads not applicable Unsafe Historical Building Elements Yes not applicable Historic Building Report Yes See Code Compliance Summary items for EBC code sections not listed here.
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Three
CODE COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

Fire Service Requirements: (FC Chapter 5) Fire Apparatus Access Road Access Openings Stairway Identification Premises Identification Hazards to Fire Fighters Fire Protection Water Supplies Fire Hydrants Fire Command Center
not applicable (skip this group) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group)
Special Requirements & Fire Ratings: (BC Chapters 4 & 7 and EBC) not applicable Yes Atrium
Number of Stories = Fire Rated Enclosure Smoke Control Standby Power
Hours
not applicable not applicable
Yes not applicable Hazardous Material Control Areas UL Design Number for Fire Rated Walls, Floor, Ceilings, and Fireproof Structural Assemblies Yes not applicable not applicable (skip this group) not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group)
tbd
Interior Finishes: (BC & FC Chapter 8 and EBC) Yes Flame Spread for all Finishes Floor Materials are Radiant Floor Panel Test Class 1
Yes Yes
Assembly Seating, Draperies, & Decorations meet NFPA 701
Fire Protection: (BC & FC Chapter 9, EBC, and SUCF Directives) not applicable (SUCF Directive) Automatic Sprinkler System Yes not applicable Kitchen Hood Extinguisher Yes not applicable Standpipe System Yes not applicable Portable Fire Extinguishers Yes not applicable Fire Alarm System Yes not applicable Automatic Detection System Yes not applicable Emergency Alarm System Yes not applicable Smoke Control System Yes not applicable Smoke & Heat Vent Yes not applicable Fire Dept. Connections Yes not applicable Fire Pumps (SUCF Directive) not applicable Post Indicator Valve Exits: (BC Chapters 7 & 10, EBC, and SUCF Directives) Yes Maximum Occupancy Sign Yes Exit Width and Ceiling Height Yes Illumination & Emergency Power Yes Door Widths Yes Stair Treads, Risers, and Width Yes Ramps Yes Handrails & Guardrails Yes Exit Signs Yes Exits (Number of Doors) Required (SUCF Directive) Corridor Width & Fire Rating (SUCF Directive) Dead End Corridors, max 20 ft. Yes Number of Exits Required Stair and Vertical Exit Enclosures (SUCF Directive) (SUCF Directive) Shaft Enclosure Walls Shaft Enclosure Top and Bottom (SUCF Directive) (SUCF Directive) Concealed Spaces Below Stair Yes Horizontal Exits
not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable
in elevator shaft must confirm by flow test
not applicable (skip this group)
Fire Rated Enclosure
Hour
in excess of requirements existing condition
Fire Rated Enclosure Fire Rated Enclosure Fire Rated Enclosure Fire Rated Enclosure Fire Rated Enclosure
2 2 2 2
Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Four

Accessibility: (BC Chapter 11, EBC, and SUCF Directives) Yes Accessible Route Yes Accessible Exits / Entrances Yes Parking, Parking Signs, Aisle Signs Yes Seating for Assembly Spaces Yes Accessible Toilets Yes Areas of Refuge Yes Accessible Elements Yes Accessible Work Stations Yes Signage Exterior Walls: (BC Chapters 6 & 14 and EBC) Building Separations Vapor Barrier Envelope Materials Metal Composite Materials
not applicable (skip this group) not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group)
Roof Assemblies: (BC Chapter 15, EBC and SUCF Directive 7-1) Yes not applicable Wind Resistance (SUCF Directive) not applicable Fire Classification UL Class A Yes not applicable Flat Roof Slope for Drainage Yes not applicable Re-roofing or Re-placing Yes not applicable Structural for: Re-roofing Yes not applicable New Structures Yes not applicable Machinery Yes not applicable Existing Parapets Yes not applicable Roof Diaphragm - Existing Bldgs. Glass: (BC Chapter 24 and EBC) Complies with CPSC 16 CFR 1201 Hazardous Locations Plastic: (BC Chapter 26 and EBC) Light Transmitting Plastic Plastic Interior Signs
Yes Yes not applicable not applicable
not applicable (skip this group) Yes Yes not applicable not applicable
Elevators and Conveying Systems: (BC Chapter 30, EBC, and SUCF Directives) not applicable (skip this group) Yes not applicable Lobby for buildings w/o sprinkler Yes not applicable Elevator - ASME A17.1 Yes not applicable Accessible Lift - ASME A18.1 Yes not applicable Vehicle Lift - ALI ALCTV-98 (SUCF Directive) not applicable Hoistway Enclosure Fire Rated Enclosure 2 Hours Yes not applicable Emergency Signs Yes not applicable Emergency Operations & Power Yes not applicable Hoistway Venting Safeguards During Construction: (BC Chapter 33, EBC, and SUCF Directives) Pedestrian Protection 8' High Barriers Storage and Obstructions Fire Extinguishers Maintenance of Exits Standpipes and Sprinkler Systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group)
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Five

list drawing(s) or specification section(s) not applicable (skip this group) not applicable
Electrical: (BC Chapter 27, EBC, and SUCF Directives) Yes NEC (NFPA 70) All Electric Work Emergency Standby Power for: Assembly Group A Smoke Control System Exit Signs Means of Egress Illumination Elevators and Platform Lifts Hazardous Locations Lightening Protection Analysis
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes (SUCF Directive)
not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable
Mechanical Systems: (BC Chapter 28, the MCNYS, and SUCF Directives) Yes not applicable Seismic Resistance not applicable Fire-resistance-rated Penetrations (SUCF Directive) (SUCF Directive) not applicable Access & Service Space Yes not applicable Condensate Disposal & Drains Yes not applicable Intake & Exhaust Opening Location Yes not applicable Outside Air & Ventilation Rate Yes not applicable Uninhabited Spaces Yes not applicable Exit Enclosure Ventilation Yes not applicable Exhaust Systems Yes not applicable Domestic Kitchen Yes not applicable Commercial Kitchen Yes not applicable Smoke Control System (SUCF Directive) not applicable Duct Systems (SUCF Directive) not applicable Provide Ducted Returns Yes not applicable Duct Smoke Detection Systems Yes not applicable Fire & Smoke Dampers Yes not applicable Combustion Air Chimneys and Vents Yes not applicable Yes not applicable Masonry Chimneys New Boiler or New Water Heaters Size in BTU/h Type of Fuel: Oil
Yes not applicable
At PSI Gas
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Electric
not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable
Other Room Size
One or Two Exits Required ASME Vessel Clearance Safety Valves & Controls Refrigeration Machinery Room Piping Hydronic Piping Fuel Oil Piping Fuel Oil Shutoff Valve Fuel Oil Storage Tank Abandonment & Removal
Refrigerant type
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Six

Plumbing Systems: (BC Chapter 29 & PCNYS and SUCF Directives) Yes not applicable Number of Plumbing Fixtures
Occupant Load Water Closets-Wmns Water Closets-Mens Urinals Lavatories Drinking Fountains
600 7 5 2 8 2
Yes Location and Distance to Fixtures Yes Water Closet Compartment Size Yes Accessible & Ambulatory Fixtures Yes Protection of Pipes & Components Fire-resistance-rated Penetrations (SUCF Directive) Yes Supports & Seismic Resistance Yes Flood Hazard Resistance Yes Tests & Inspections Yes Condensate Disposal Yes Water Heater Location Yes HWH Safety Devices Yes Storage Tank Insulation Yes Size & Material for Piping Yes Water Pressure Reduction Yes Lead Free Solder Yes Valve Installations Yes Tempered Water for Accessible Yes Hot Water Maintenance Yes Piping Insulation Yes Backflow Prevention Yes Water Supply Protection Yes Identification of Plumbing Lines Yes Sanitary & Chemical Pipe Materials Yes Building Sewer Yes Indirect Waste Pipe Yes Special Wastes Yes Plumbing Vents Yes Traps, Interceptors & Separators Yes Building Trap Justification Yes Roof Drains Yes Secondary Roof Drains
not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable (skip this group) not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable not applicable
Fuel Gas Systems: (FGCNYS and SUCF Directives) Yes Public Utility Connections Yes Supports & Seismic Resistance Fire-resistance-rated Penetrations (SUCF Directive) Yes Hazardous & Prohibited Locations Yes Combustion Air Yes Access/Clearances Yes Condensate Disposal Yes Identification Yes Pipe Sizes & Materials Yes Installation Beneath Buildings Yes Inspection & Testing Yes Valves Yes Vents & Venting Yes Chimney Termination Yes Sizing Venting Systems Yes Unvented Room Heaters
SUCF PROJECT NO.:
00000
Page Seven
STRUCTURAL DESIGN SUMMARY

1604.5 Prior to structural design, the Campus has been consulted to determine if this facility is currently or will be considered for use as an emergency shelter facility? If "No" this must be done before the submission of Schematic Design. Yes No not applicable Will this building be used as an Emergency Shelter?
Yes No
Summary Information: The New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code Section 1603 requires, "The design loads and other information pertinent to the structural design required by Sections 1603.1.1 through 1603.1.8 shall be clearly indicated on the construction documents for parts of the building or structure." SD Report Section 5.B.
list drawing numbers
Design load information provided on the drawings will include:

Yes Not applicable
Conventional light-frame construction (when provided) with floor and roof live loads, ground snow load, and basic wind speed (3-second gust), miles per hour and wind exposure. Floor live loads, roof live loads, roof snow loads, and wind loads (1603.1,2,3, & 4). Earthquake design data including: site class, seismic use group, and seismic design category (1603.1.5). Appropriate Building Category with Seismic, Snow, and Wind Factors (Table 1604.5). Special loads (1603.7).
not applicable Not in flood hazard area per Section 1612.3 Flood certification provided per Section 1612.5 Yes not applicable
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Flood Plains Flood load
Component Design requirements have been reviewed by the architect and engineers. Soils Soil investigation report is required to be provided within the specification. Soil classification & design load bearing capacity Truss/Joist Identification Signs provided?
Yes not applicable Yes
Not applicable
tbd
list drawing or specification sections
tbd
Special Inspection requirements, where are they located in the documents?
tbd
ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE SUMMARY

Applicability:
(check the definitions) New Building Additions Low Energy Usage Building 10B 10% or less 11B 12B Substantial alterations Historic Building Unconditioned Building 13A between 25% and 40% In compliance 14A 15 16 greater than 50% Change in occupancy Not applicable
Exempt Building: Climate Zone: Glazing percentage:
between 10% and 25%
between 40% and 50%
Building Envelope Requirements: (Less than 50% glazing) U-factors of the envelope systems
Worksheets available
Not applicable
or
list drawing numbers list specification sections
U-factors of fenestration products

or
list specification sections
R-values of insulating materials

or
list specification sections Not applicable 803.2 Applicable list drawing number 803.3 Applicable
Building Mechanical Systems: Design Load Service Water Heating: Lighting and Power Systems: Interior lighting power
Applicable Applicable Entire building method
Not applicable Not applicable Portion of building method Applicable Not applicable
Modeling as required by Executive Order 111: (SUCF Directive)
FF&E Evaluations
SECTION 7
The design team visited the BRCs current location on One Development Court several times to evaluate existing fixtures, furniture and equipment. All spaces including but not limited to, lecture rooms, computer rooms and offices were surveyed to assess the current condition of FF&E based upon age, wear, useful life and visible appearance. Nearly 90% of the desks, tables and chairs utilized by the BRC are original IBM furniture from the late 1950s. There are several different types of chairs throughout the space; original task arm chairs on casters with and without arm rests, newer task chairs with and without casters, tablet chairs, and several types of wood veneer desks and computer stations. Though there is some consistency in style and type, the fabric colors vary within rooms, (see attached photos). The furniture is comprised mainly of metal rather than plastic, and is in fair condition. However, the furniture is showing signs of wear and age; wood veneer tables are chipped at edges and chair fabrics are stained. Our recommendation is that the college replace as much of the existing furniture as possible, including lecture rooms, classroom, computer rooms and office room furniture. There are several rooms, for example, Computer Rooms 501, 206 and 204 and Office 409 whose chairs could be relocated and reused in offices, conference rooms or break out rooms. Should the college decide to reuse some furniture, we suggest that those pieces be located in rooms that are not of high visibility. Re-use of fixtures and equipment such as, computers, projectors and such will be of the discretion of SUNY Ulster. However, the Fire Arms Simulator and Driving Simulator will be relocated to the new facility. The cost to fully equip and furnish the BRC at 94 Marys Ave. with new furniture as recommended is as follows: New Entry Lounge/Cafe Classroom/Lecture Rm Furniture $12,000 x 11 Computer Room Furniture $15,000 x 5 Office Furniture $3,000 x 18 = $20,000 = $132,000 = $75,000 (includes SCLC) = $54,000 (includes conference rooms)

24
FF&E Evaluations
SECTION 7
Typical large lecture room
Lounge with original chairs
Typical ADA compliant desk
Computer Room 206
Typical tablet desk

25
FF&E Evaluations
SECTION 7
Computer Room 501
Conference Room
Typical Office
Registrar Office
Registrar Window

26
Conceptual Project Budget
SECTION 8
The schematic project estimate on the following page is based on two design layouts, a base layout and alternate layout. Each layout considers the program requirements to allow the BRC to function at its current capacity and beyond. A dollar amount of $160.00/SF and 60.00$/SF were used to calculate costs of major and minor renovations respectively. Minor Renovations include new flooring, ceilings and lighting systems, painted walls and ceiling soffits, and additional data and outlets as required. Spaces in this category remain mostly intact with upgrades and improvements to surfaces. Major Renovations, in addition to surface improvements, include demolishing and rebuilding walls to reconfigure space. Floor Plans illustrating these distinct areas follow the schematic estimate. The schematic estimate illustrates three costs shown in columns 1, 2 and 3. Columns 1 and 3 relate to the base layout and alternate layout, respectively. Column 2 is a combination of the base layout and alternate layout. This cost reflects the alternate layout with the maximum parking spaces, the larger entrance addition from the base layout, new windows, showers in the changing rooms and new furniture.

27
Conceptual Project Budget
SECTION 8
1 Base
2 Alternate +
3 Alternate Comments *Deduct 130,000 to delete 10 spaces
SITE:
Parking Lot / Road Lighting Walks / Plaza
$704,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00
$704,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00
*$574,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00
ADDITIONS:
Entrance @ $400 Two (2) Stop Including Shaft
460,000.00
460,000.00
*230,000.00
*Reduce entrance by 50%
ELEVATOR:
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
RENOVATIONS:
Major @ $160 Minor @$ 60 SUBTOTAL Renovations
2,249,600.00 641,100.00 $2,890,700.00
*1,678,400.00 1,040,400.00 *$2,718,800.00
1,628,400.00 1,040,400.00 *$2,668,800.00
*Add 50K for showers *+ four (4) classrooms *Refurbish & Paint * windows *Rate Corridor * Walls in lieu
WINDOWS:
@$60 /Square Foot
270,000.00
270,000.00
*60,000.00
FIRE SPRINKLER:
$6 x 28,000 + $300,000
SUBTOTAL Contingency @10% SUBTOTAL Incidentals @ 15% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
468,000.00 $4,992,700.00 499,270.00 $5,491,970.00 823,795.50 $6,315,765.50
*75,000.00 $4,427,800.00 442,780.00 $4,870,580.00 730,587.00 $5,601,167.00
*75,000.00 $3,807,800.00 380,780.00 $4,188,580.00 628,287.00 $4,816,867.00
Furniture Allowance Addition Above K Wing @$400 TOTAL PROJECT COST
200,000.00 1,316,800.00 $7,832,565.50
281,000.00
*35,000.00
*Lobby/lounge/ Registrar furniture * only
$5,882,167.00
$4,851,867.00

28
NO WORK MINOR RENOVATIONS MAJOR RENOVATIONS NEW CONSTRUCTION RENOVATIONS LEGEND
Preliminar y Second Floor Plan
Preliminar y First Floor Plan
K i n g s t o n , N Y M a r c h 2 0 13
Count y of Ulster | SUNY Ulster

29
NO WORK MINOR RENOVATIONS MAJOR RENOVATIONS NEW CONSTRUCTION RENOVATIONS LEGEND
1
3
SCHEME 2- FIRST FLOOR

3/32" = 1'-0"
Altenate Scheme
K i n g s t o n , N Y M a r c h 0 8 , 2 0 13
MARCH 8, 2013
SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center | Sophie Finn Relocation
SUNY Ulster
30
Logistical Planning and Scheduling
SECTION 9
We understand that SUNY Ulster wants to occupy the building in January of 2014. In order to meet this schedule, the County of Ulster and SUNY Ulster need to act quickly and proceed with design. Upon the design phase, a site logistics plan, a construction phasing plan for the renovations and building addition, and a scheduling plan will be developed. The site logistics plan will indicate construction areas, works areas, lay-down areas for staging, site access for construction and the restoration of the site post construction. The desired occupancy date will be affected by long lead items. Windows, doors, and particular mechanical equipment will be identified and selected early to ensure timely delivery. Some of these items may require pre-ordering prior to bid or specifying alternative materials that are more readily available. Throughout this process, a conscious effort will be made in the design, the selection of materials and construction methods so to not delay the construction schedule.

31
Summaries of Design-Build and Labor Agreements
SECTION 10
A project labor agreement, or PLA, is a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement between a contractor and a bona fide building and construction trade labor organization establishing the labor organization as the collective bargaining representative for all persons who will perform work on a public work project, and which provides that only contractors and subcontractors who sign a pre-negotiated agreement with the labor organization can perform project work. This form of labor agreement is utilized in large scale public and private projects to control the quality of labor, wages, strikes, etc. But the establishment of PLAs with multiple trades involved is cumbersome and expensive. Formation and administration of a PLA requires a comprehensive study and eventually requires labor attorneys from both sides to agree on the substance of the agreement. For that reason, projects of the size of the Business Center relocation seldom have their own PLA in effect. Design-Build is gaining popularity in the US because it is generally a less expensive and quicker form of project delivery. Under this process, a builder is teamed with a design team early in the process and the team works for the owner toward common goals from the start. A guaranteed maximum price is generally provided to the owner prior to construction. This price is generally 10 to 15 percent lower than traditional design-bid-build with WICKs law. While this method of building will surely be available in the future, with a few exceptions, NYS law does not allow the option for design-build when public funds are involved. The State University Construction Fund can and does use design-build, however; the County of Ulster is not permitted to use design-build. Therefore, this project cannot utilize designbuild without State legislative approval.

32
Second Floor Plan E x i s t i n g F l o o r P l a n s - 9 4 M a r y s Av e
First Floor Plan

33
40 Beaver Street Albany, New York 12207-1511 518.463.8068 Fax 518.463.8069 www.csarchpc.com
Meeting Minutes
PROJECT
SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Sophie Finn Relocation Project 94 Marys Avenue Kingston, NY 12401
MEETING DATE MEETING TIME
January 23, 2013 9:00 AM
CSArch PROJ. # 413-12-01
LOCATION
SUNY Ulster at Stone Ridge St. Johns Conference Room
ATTENDEES
Suzanne Cahill Kyla Haber Bryan Manning Tina Mesiti Cas Thomas Clapper Allen Olsen Marianne Collins Donald Katt Mark Komdat Ann Marrott Christopher Marx Dennis Doyle Chris White Jeff Bodrow
REPRESENTING
City of Kingston City of Kingston CSArch CSArch Kingston CSD Kingston CSD SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster Ulster County Planning Ulster County Planning Weston & Sampson
E-MAIL
scahill@kingston-ny.gove khaber@kingston-ny.gov bmanning@csarchpc.com tmesiticeas@csarchpc.com tclapper@kingstoncityschools.org aolsen@kingstoncityschools.org collinsm@sunyulster.edu kattd@sunyulster.edu komdatm@sunyulster.edu marrotta@sunyulster.edu marxc@sunyulster.edu ddoy@co.ulster.ny.us cwhi@co.ulster.ny.us budrowj@wseinc.com
COPIES TO: Dr. Paul Padalino, Jonathan Rhea, Wayne Freer
PURPOSE OF MEETING: Project Kick Off Meeting

ITEM 1 DISCUSSION Project Team Introductions and Communication The project team was introduced; Chris Marx is the main contact regarding operations/programming for SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center. Mark Komdat is the SUNY Ulster Project Manager for the project. Mark will coordinate weekly meetings with CSArch and project team. Sue Kahill is the main contact from the City of Kingston Tom Clapper is the main contact from Kingston City School District Bryan Manning is the main contact from CSArch. Dr. Donald Katt gave a brief historical briefing of the Business Resource Center/Project. The existing location owned by Ulster County, on One Development Court in Kingston, NY was initially occupied by IBM. The lease agreement between SUNY Ulster and the County was valid until 2010. Two to three other county departments will be moving into space that the
Formerly Collins + Scoville Architects, P.C.
ACTION
34
Meeting Minutes January 23, 2013 SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Sophie Finn Relocation Project Page 2
ITEM
DISCUSSION Business Resource Center (BRC) currently occupies and therefore, SUNY Ulster began looking for space to relocate. Approximately 10 months ago, the College considered locating the BRC in the vicinity of TECH City but found it was too costly. SUNY Ulster became aware of Kingston CSDs plan to close Sophie Finn Elementary School. Several pros and cons for this location were discussed. Cons: o Setting is somewhat isolated as compared to the current location. o Lack of parking o Fear of cost of upgrades to convert from elementary to collegiate facility. Pros: o Located between KCSD High School and Benedictine Hospital o Possibility to be perceived as an extension of High School to increase enrollment. o Collaboration with SUNY IT / nursing program. o Adjacent bus line. Project Budget $4.4M is available to fund this project. A 2010 Facilities Report of Sophie Finn estimates $6M in upgrades. Chris White mentioned that the County is looking at other funding sources, including, NYSERDA, and that the final report will dictate how much additional funds are needed to support the project. All parties made clear that a $10M project is not possible. The Report will act as a model for other similar type school conversion projects. This project may be considered in two phases, however a second phase is unlikely: Phase 1 - Building Occupancy by January 2013 Phase 2 Classroom Additions County/ City School District/SUNY logistics SUNY Ulster and the City School District have not yet come to an agreement on the means by which the BRC will occupy Sophie Finn. A lease to buy may be considered however, an agreement will not be determined until the findings of the Report are made public. The County will be the lead agent for SEQRA however the City of Kingston will be involved. Jeff Bodrow discussed the following site/water management issue: Grading to access a new parking area at the back of the building can be achieved. A comfortable slope between 7% and 10% will be accommodated. The existing site is mainly bed rock. The design team will explore means of retaining water before it is released. Pervious pavement was discussed the project team is very interested in sustainable approaches that minimize water run-off. Kingston CSD is currently pursuing water management systems. The design team will coordinate with Kingston CSD to avoid redundancy. Bryan Manning reviewed the project schedule; see attachment. In addition to site visits and meetings, a weekly conference call will be held to keep all teams members up to date and to keep the planning process moving along.
ACTION
35
ITEM
DISCUSSION CSArch will initiate an FTP site to be utilized by the project team. The following design issues were discussed: Sophie Finn is wired for networking and wireless. There are network drops in every classroom. The server is located at the high school. LEED Silver is a goal depending on costs, however, certification may not be sought. Project team is interested in pursuing green technologies the client team visited a LEED Platinum building in Staatsburgh. This building was also an elementary school conversion project. CSArch plans to tour the facility. Renovations should modernize the facility, create a more collegiate feel, and provide a new visible/open entry. The Final Report shall include: Energy standard/s basis of design, i.e., CHIPS, LEED, and /or GBC An evaluation of different labor agreements. A description and analysis of systems including life cycle cost and initial cost: o Air conditioning o Elevator o Storm water o Window system o Sprinkler system o Exterior night lighting o Emergency communication system Miscellaneous Classes generally begin at 5:30 pm. Vehicular traffic picks up at 5:00pm. City of Kingston is generally concerned with the impact on neighbors, storm water and vehicular traffic.
ACTION
10
Next Meeting:
TBD
The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the items discussed and decisions reached. If there are any corrections, please contact the undersigned.
PREPARED BY: Tina Mesiti-Cas
DATE PREPARED: 01/29/2013
File: Central/CA/CM: Meeting Minutes Document: N:\401-499 College\413-12-01 SUNY Ulster\00-TEXT\02-Program\413-12-01 MM 2013-01-23 SUNY Ulster BRC.docx
36
Meeting Minutes
PROJECT
MEETING DATE MEETING TIME
January 29, 2013 1:00 PM
CSArch PROJ. # 413-12-01
LOCATION
SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center
ATTENDEES
Bryan Manning Tina Mesiti Cas Marianne Collins Christopher Marx Arnaldo Sehwerert Chris White
REPRESENTING
CSArch CSArch SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster/SBDC Ulster County Planning
E-MAIL
bmanning@csarchpc.com tmesiticeas@csarchpc.com collinsm@sunyulster.edu marxc@sunyulster.edu sehwerea@sunyulster.edu cwhi@co.ulster.ny.us
COPIES TO: C.Marx for distribution
PURPOSE OF MEETING: Programming Meeting

ITEM 1 DISCUSSION Chris Marx distributed an enrollment demographics analysis. The analysis shows that; Almost 50% of Continuing Educations Students are over 45 years of age. Nearly 20% are over the age of 60. Just over 20% are under the age of 20. 28% of Ulster County enrollment are from Kingston Other counties make up about 19% of enrollment. See attached demographic study for additional information. Marianne and Chris M. talked about functions and current programs offered at the BRC; BRC acts as a training facility full day training sessions. Small Business Development Center (SBDC) is a signature program. SBDC interfaces with county economic development. Ulster County STRIVE Strategic Taxpayer Relief through Innovative Visions in Education. In addition to the relocation of BRC to Sophie Finn, the BRC has developed other programs, such as GED to support the countys vision. Food Service Food is sometimes provided for training sessions. Current location provides access to many eating establishment. Vending machines are the only means of regular access to food within the existing facility. Most students come into the BRC with a coffee in hand which is
ACTION
37
ITEM
DISCUSSION facilitated by the current locations proximity to restaurants. Must consider how food service will be provided at new location. Considerations include; caf/prepared sandwich type system, current food service provider, other catering companies local vendor on Broadway or the hospital, warming kitchen, and/or vending machines. Marianne, Chris M. and Chris White discussed project design considerations; Increased enrollment is critical Classroom space is priority - will sacrifice larger spaces for additional classrooms. Consider flexible spaces for example, combine Police Academy simulation room and exercise room. Identify non-essential programs to STRIVE the Board is considering alternate locations for community programs. Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Arnaldo Sehwerert, Director of SBDC discussed the functions and role of the SBDC. Arnaldo explained the confidential nature of the SBDC and that the SBDC is governed by federal law. The following comments and needs were discussed: Current layout works well and requirements remain the same. There are 9 staff members but only 6 are on site no new staff are anticipated. Typical day is 8:00 am 5:30pm. Space Need: o 5 offices 1 is a shared office for 2 employees. Offices must be locking Each office requires a printer no network connection 1-2 files per desk 2-3 persons meet at a time side table required used for both guests and to accommodate large amounts of paperwork. o 1 secure storage space for files that must be kept for 5 years (just under 100 SF). o 1 conference room. o 1 reception area for 1 receptionist. o 1 waiting area o General file storage area. Currently there is a guard at the main entrance to the BRC however, a guard is not required. Reuse furniture as much as possible. Continuing and Professional Education Department Chris Marx, Associate Dean, discussed the functions and role of the department. CPE Department consists of the (2) Associate Deans, (1) Operations Coordinator, (3) Program Coordinators, and (2-3) registrars. The following comments and needs were discussed: A suite set up with a reception area is preferred. Total of (3) Offices: o Associate Dean o Operations Coordinator o Associate Dean (1) Open Work Area with systems furniture for (3) Coordinators.
ACTION
38
ITEM
DISCUSSION o Guest chairs required. (1) Registrar Area for (2-3) people o Registrar takes student information. o Must be secure and welcoming, ideally situated near student entry o Current configuration incorporates a pass through windows student and registrar are separated by wall and glass window. This layout is not welcoming or personal, and there is not seating area for a student/potential student. Reception area could have multiple functions, i.e., work study students use. The current BRC has one faculty room with mail boxes. It is not a comfortable space for faculty. Consider a space for faculty to secure personal belongings. Chris White discussed the importance of having the faculty feeling comfortable and conveying an exciting vision. Consider design solutions that improve their working environment and create engagement, such as; Outdoor teaching/lounge space. Increased natural daylight. Collegiate environment. Marianne asked that CSArch meet with Wayne Freer, Director of Safety and Security, and the City of Kingston. Thursday, January 31.
ACTION
7 8
Next Meeting:
File: Central/CA/CM: Meeting Minutes Document: N:\401-499 College\413-12-01 SUNY Ulster\00-TEXT\02-Program\413-12-01 MM 2013-01-29 SUNY Ulster BRC.docx
39
Meeting Minutes
PROJECT
MEETING DATE MEETING TIME LOCATION
January 31, 2013
1:30 and 3:00 PM SUNY Ulster at Stone Ridge
CSArch PROJ. # 413-12-01 ATTENDEES

Bryan Manning Tina Mesiti Cas Marianne Collins Christopher Marx Arnaldo Sehwerert John Frampton Theresa Howard Christopher Marx Marianne Collins Sarah Fajardo Mark Komdat James Truitt Deana Schreiber Jody Mesches John Ganio Jonathan Rhea MacKenzie Kell Linda Corsones Cornelia Denvir Steven Schimmrich Wayne Freer 3:00 pm Meeting Jane Kithcart John Ganio Marianne Collins Mindy Kole Jonathan Rhea MacKenzie Kell Mark Komdat Linda Corsones Sarah Fajardo Wayne Freer Bryan Manning Tina Mesiti Cas
REPRESENTING
CSArch CSArch SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster/SBDC SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster
E-MAIL
bmanning@csarchpc.com tmesiticeas@csarchpc.com collinsm@sunyulster.edu marxc@sunyulster.edu sehwerea@sunyulster.edu framptoj@sunyulster.edu howardt@sunyulster.edu marxc@sunyulster.edu collinsm@sunyulster.edu fajardos@sunyulster.edu komdatm@sunyulster.edu truittj@sunyulster.edu schreibd@sunyulster.edu meschesj@sunyulster.edu ganio@sunyulster.edu rheaj@sunyulster.edu kellm@sunyulster.edu corsonel@sunyulster.edu denvirc@sunyulster.edu schimmrs@sunyulster.edu freerw@sunyulster.com
SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster SUNY Ulster CSArch CSArch
kithcarJ@sunyulster.edu ganio@sunyulster.edu collinsm@sunyulster.edu kolem@sunyulster.edu rheaj@sunyulster.edu kellm@sunyulster.edu komdatm@sunyulster.edu corsonel@sunyulster.edu fajardos@sunyulster.edu freerw@sunyulster.com bmanning@csarchpc.com tmesiticeas@csarchpc.com
COPIES TO: C.Marx for distribution
40
PURPOSE OF MEETING: Programming Meeting

ITEM 1:30 PM Meeting 1 Chris Marx gave an introduction to the Project and reviewed the BRC program matrix. Chris explained that SUNY Ulster is looking to: Increase GED enrollment. Increase military outreach. Provide services that will attract enrollment. Chris Marx discussed the importance of community involvement and that he would be looking to both the community and administration on input for future programs. The following considerations were mentioned: Short term child drop off center for students while attending class Introduction of a Wet Chemistry Lab to support water treatment program and Intro to Chemistry. Increase in small group student study spaces. Utilization of proximity of St. Benedictine Hospital to complement health/programs. What are the facilitys needs to make programs successful. How do we expand credit courses. Parking is a major concern. A traffic study for both day and evening should be considered. The city will be brought into these discussions. The heaviest day of enrollment from the fall of 2010 was 192. This number excludes staff and officers from the Police Academy. Of the 192 enrolled students, a large percentage drive. The BRC believes that there are approximately 100 to 120 active vehicles on site at one given time. Over flow parking must be provided. Space Requirements and Needs: (1) space for faculty to act as a home base or as a place to store personal belongings. This space could also house the faculty copy machine. (1-2) printing areas for faculty and student services. (1-2) smaller classrooms for 9 students or (1) large classroom than can be divided. (1) Large Conference Room (1) Small Conference Room (1) Open Computer Lab (3) Computer Labs for courses (1) Space to accommodate 100 for large gathering, public lectures, etc. Tables and chairs are preferred over tablet arms chairs. ADA is important. Student Services should be adjacent to adjunct faculty. o Meeting rooms required but shared w/ other departments. o Consider smaller break-out rooms. o Telephone/Fax o Tutor Space o (2-3) 2 Person Offices can also be used as a meeting space. o Needs to be near a copy area. WIFI needed and technology is important. Partial food service is desirable, similar to a Caf. Lounge Space should be adjacent to Caf.
41
ACTION
Meeting Minutes January 31, 2013 SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Sophie Finn Relocation Project Page 3 ITEM 5 Police Academy Considerations: Ideally, PA spaces should be located on an exterior wall so that a private entry is possible. Direct access to the exterior is also desirable for outdoor training. Access to water from the exterior is required to support outdoor training. Isolation is important because of noise Classes are held both day and night. Of the calendar year, there are only 3 weeks free of courses. Enrollment is made up of 5 counties. Police Academy Space Requirements: (1) large classroom to accommodate 40 officers in training. (1) large lecture classroom for 50 this space could also accommodate smaller lectures 35-40 students. (1) Fire Arm Simulation Room for 30 (observation area in simulator room with 30 seats) could also accommodate driving simulator which requires space for 12. This space must be alarmed. Separate male and female locker rooms with showers. o 50 lockers total approximately 70% male, 30% female o Eight showers (1) Office space for (2) current office is 288 SF. (1) Additional office space if possible. Lounge space could be shared with BRC or separate. Storage for uniforms and equipment. The group discussed the idea of compiling a focus group or perhaps surveying students at the BRC to ask; what currently works and what does not work Miscellaneous Items: SUNY IT is looking at providing their Nursing Program on line and therefore, they Nursing would not be housed at the BRC. Will this facility impact the Cancer Support facility located nearby? Need to balance a secure facility with an open community environment. ACTION
7 8
42
Meeting Minutes January 31, 2013 SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Sophie Finn Relocation Project Page 4 ITEM 3:00 PM MEETING Chris Marx gave a brief introduction see Item 1 from 1:30 PM Meeting. The concern about parking was discussed. There are a large amount of cars getting in and out of the facility in a short time period. Current access must be evaluated and revised to accommodate traffic. Proximity of Sophie Finn to Kingston High School is important. High School students take placement tests at BRC. Proximity allows for testing to occur as early as 3:30pm at Sophie Finn. SMART classroom technology, and sound isolation and privacy are important throughout the facility. Podium Rooms Fully equipped space with computer and screen Projector Rooms No computer but connection for laptop sound is problematic in these rooms. Space Requirements and Needs: (3) Tutoring spaces for 1 on 1 tutoring and smaller groups with a computer or wireless capability. (2) Office spaces shared offices for faculty could have dual function, i.e. tutoring space Faculty Space within the Continuing Educations Department for storing personal belongings Faculty Copy Room (1) Large Gathering Space for 100 (1) Smaller Fitness Area Cooled Server Area Wireless equipment Professional counseling area SBDC could move to kindergarten area Commons Area: o Near Student Services Remote reference librarian Remote tutoring o Near Food Service/Caf o Consider dispersed spaces for small group gathering. Conference Rooms to accommodate: o 1 large, 1 small o Board Room simulation for high school students. o General Meetings o Consider Video Conferencing Mini-library for only a hand full of books situated near the Commons or a small Resource Room. One male and one female bathroom on each wing. Caf Server Room Consider Food Truck Area for washing coffee cups, near large conference room. Wayne Freer, Director of Safety and Security, discussed the following: An all-call system that speaks to the entire campus. Lobby should be equipped with microphone or portable system. Blue light system shall be installed on campus grounds. CSArch suggested key card entry and guard at secure back door.
43
ACTION
1 2
Meeting Minutes January 31, 2013 SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Sophie Finn Relocation Project Page 5 Typical Requirements include: o Pull Stations, CO2 Detectors in each occupied space, and compliance with ADA. Exterior/Site Lighting upgrades will be required. County will issue the building permit yet the New York State building code is applicable. Miscellaneous Items: Student-child drop off was discussed with the intent of providing a place where enrolled students could leave their children while a course is in session. W.Freer stated that he would look into the implications of this type of service. Lighting Upgrades are required. Main Entrance should be staffed by a guard. Existing furniture at BRC will be evaluated for re-use. B. Manning discussed the likeliness of all the original Vinyl Tile to be asbestos tile and as a result would require abatement if removed. A cost savings measure could be to leave the tile in place in selective low traffic areas and to install carpet directly over. SUNY Ulster however, would prefer abating as much as possible. TBD
Next Meeting:
File: Central/CA/CM: Meeting Minutes Document: N:\401-499 College\413-12-01 SUNY Ulster\00-TEXT\02-Program\ MM 2013-01-31 SUNY Ulster BRC.docx
44
Existing Site - Upper Level
Lower Level
Preliminar y Proposed Site Plan - Upper Level
Aerial View K i n g s t o n , N Y M a r c h 0 8 , 2 0 13
Preliminar y Proposed Site Plan - Lower Level
SUNY Ulster Busine ss Re source Center | S ophie Finn Relo cation
45
MECHANICAL SPACE/TOILET ROOMS CIRCULATION

CLASSRM CLASSRM
SHARED SPACE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER COMMUNITY/COLLEGE PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION/FACULTY POLICE ACADEMY SERVICES
PC PC PC CE SUITE
O O O
GENERAL CLASSROOMS STUDENT AMENITIES BUILDING ADDITION LEGEND
REGISTRAR VEST W R
S LOBBY
SERVER LECTURE RM FAS O O CLASSRM CONF
STRG W
COMP RM
PHYSICAL TRAINING
MECH
WL
STRG
ML
46
MECHANICAL SPACE/TOILET ROOMS
CIRCULATION
CLASSRM CLASSRM
SHARED SPACE
SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER

COMMUNITY/COLLEGE PROGRAMS
ADMINISTRATION/FACULTY
POLICE ACADEMY SERVICES
GENERAL CLASSROOMS STUDENT AMENITIES
CLASSRM
BUILDING ADDITION
LEGEND
COMPUTER RM
SHARED CONF RM
O
OPEN LAB
COMP RM
CAFE M SCLC RSVP FITNESS CLASSRM MECH

F T O R W
FACULTY OFFICE/ TUTOR SPACE
47
MECHANICAL SPACE/TOILET ROOMS CIRCULATION

COMP RM CLASSRM
SHARED SPACE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER COMMUNITY/COLLEGE PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION/FACULTY POLICE ACADEMY SERVICES
PC PC PC CE SUITE O O
GENERAL CLASSROOMS STUDENT AMENITIES BUILDING ADDITION LEGEND
O REGISTRAR
VEST LOBBY
M M COMP RM CLASSRM CLASSRM W CLASSRM CONF
SERVER CAFE
M OPEN LAB STRG COMP RM CLASSRM
CLASSROOM
Alternate Preliminar y Second Floor Plan
FITNESS CLASSRM
48 48
MECHANICAL SPACE/TOILET ROOMS CIRCULATION SHARED SPACE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER COMMUNITY/COLLEGE PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION/FACULTY POLICE ACADEMY SERVICES GENERAL CLASSROOMS STUDENT AMENITIES BUILDING ADDITION LEGEND
LECTURE RM CLASSRM CLASSRM
FAS
W RSVP
O O ML
SCLC
O FO
CLASSRM
M
WL
F PHYSICAL TRAINING MECH
C/ FAX
Alternate Preliminar y First Floor Plan
FACULTY OFFICE/ TUTOR SPACE
49
Preliminar y Building Entrance Addition
50

Feasibility Report For S.T.R.I.V.E. PROJECT

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feasibility Report For S.T.R.I.V.E. PROJECT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feasibility Study

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster

Existing Floor Plans Meeting Minutes Proposed Design

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Introduction and Executive Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Introduction and Executive Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Space Inventory Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Architectural Design Concept

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Architectural Design Concept

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

ELECTRICAL I. Power Systems

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

Building Systems Summary

SUSTAINABLE DESIGN APPROACH

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations

SUNY Ulster Business Resource Center Feb.22, 2013

Materials and Resources, Continued

Credit 5 Credit 6 Credit 7

Recycled Content Regional Materials Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood

Indoor Environmental Quality

Energy and Atmosphere

Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4 Credit 5 Credit 6

Innovation and Design Process

Materials and Resources

Regional Priority Credits

Possible Points: 110

Feasibility Study March 2013

County of Ulster | SUNY Ulster Relocation of Business Resource Center

SUCF DESIGN SERVICES CODE REVIEW

State University Construction Fund