Professional Documents
Culture Documents
\
where A, B and p are constants that represent the inverse,
the very inverse and the extremely inverse types oI the OCR.
The constants in this paper are decided by very inverse type oI
Korea Electronic Power Corporation (KEPCO) and shown in
Table III. The M means multi-rate oI current which is made up
oI I
input
that is equal to Iault current, and I
pickup
that is
calculated by setting rule. TD (Time Dial) is also decided by
protection coordination Irom the setting rule |9|.
TABLE III
Parameters oI very inverse type in KEPCO
Parameters A B p
Constants 39.85 1.084 1.95
III. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
A. Studv on Selection of Impedance
As mentioned above, there is a problem in applying the
SFCL that the limited eIIect oI Iault current depends on a
impedance oI SFCL and the operation oI protective device is
3
also inIluenced by limited Iault current. To solve the problem,
this study investigates the impedance Ior operation oI OCR
according to setting rule. The setting rule oI OCR`s operation
is as Iollows :
The OCR is operated within 0.5 seconds when a three-phase
short circuit Iault occurs at the point where the Ieeder is drawn
out Irom substation, Fault 1 in Fig. 1.
According to above rule, the magnitude oI Iault current is
also limited by M in equation (1), because the Iault current
aIIects the operation time oI OCR. In order to keep the setting
rule, the M is calculated Irom equation (1) with Table II and
Table III. As a result oI computation, the M is got to 3.2 multi-
rate. Using the given date oI I
pickup
(Time Delay Operation
Current) which is contained in M, Irom Table II, the I
input
(The
Fault Current) is estimated Ior available minimum Iault
current, in other words, the impedance oI SFCL has maximum
value because the OCR has the characteristics oI very inverse
within the time oI delay operation under setting rule. With the
result in that the I
input
is Iound as 7.1 |kArms|.
Finally, the impedance oI SFCL can be searched through
equation (2) which Iinds the Iault current on the basis oI 100
|MVA|. Using provided Iault current Irom above step, Z
S
and
Z
Tr
Irom Table I, the impedance oI SFCL can be obtained.
100
2521.18 2
f
S Tr SFCL
I
Z Z Z
u
From all step, the Z
SFCL
is calculated as j13.7 || which is
equal to j0.72 || and describes the impedance diIIerence
between transIormers with 45 |MVA| and 100 |MVA|.
B. Simulation using PSCAD/EMTDC
The simulation has been executed Ior review oI proposed
impedance by PSCAD/EMDTC. In simulation, three-phase
short circuit Iault occurred by setting rule at 0.1 |sec| and
continued Ior a long time. Fig. 3 shows waveIorm oI Iault
current without SFCL in case oI capacity oI transIormers
when the setting oI OCR is equal.
BeIore replacement oI the main transIormer, the OCR
operates normally. With maintaining the state oI OCR, aIter
change oI the transIormer with larger capacity, the Iault
current has been increased and it aIIects an operation time oI
OCR to run early. When the SFCL is installed on secondary
side oI transIormer to decrease the Iault current, Fig. 4 shows
the results. Consequently, the SFCL limits the Iault current
that can be compared without SFCL at 100 |MVA| in Fig. 3.
Although higher impedance is more eIIective, the operation
time oI OCR is kept by setting rule. As the chosen impedance
through equation (2) is applied, the result shows Fig. 4. (a) in
Fig. 4 has j0.7 ||, and limited Iault current and operation
time oI OCR are almost likely to the Iault current at 45
|MVA|. II the impedance is higher than proposed value, the
eIIect shows (b) in Fig. 4. The inIluence oI SFCL is better
than (a), however, operation time over the regulation.
From the result oI above all, the chosen magnitude oI SFCL`s
impedance can conIirm exact impedance because the Iault
current is interrupted correctly within operation time under
setting rule.
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
-30
-15
0
15
30
-30
-15
0
15
30
(b)
(a)
LImItcd tImc
nf 5cttIng ru!c
Fau!t start
TImc [scc]
C
u
r
r
c
n
t
[
k
A
]
Fig. 3. WaveIorm oI Iault current without SFCL in the case that the setting
parameters oI OCR are equal. (a) With 45 |MVA|. (b) With 100 |MVA|.
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
-30
-15
0
15
30
-30
-15
0
15
30
Fau!t start
C
u
r
r
c
n
t
[
k
A
]
TImc [scc]
LImItcd tImc
nf 5cttIng ru!c
(b)
(a)
Fig. 4. WaveIorm oI Iault current with SFCL in case oI impedance at 100
|MVA|. (a) j0.7 ||. (b) j0.8 ||.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This study proposed the impedance oI the SFCL
considering the OCR`s operation. The SFCL is introduced to
solve the Iault current problem by replacing transIormer, and
the impedance oI SFCL has upper boundary to keep the
setting rule oI protection relay. This paper suggested the
impedance and was veriIied through simulation tool oI
PSCAD/EMTDC.
V. REFERENCES
|1| L. Ye, L. Z. Lin, K. P. Juengst, 'Application Studies oI
Superconducting Fault Current Limiters in Electric Power
Systems, IEEE Transactions on applied Superconductivity,
vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 900-903, March 2002
4
|2| L. Ye, A. Campbell, 'Case study oI HTS resistive
superconducting Iault current limiter in electrical distribution
systems, Electric Power Systems Research 77, pp. 534-539,
2002
|3| L. Ye, A. Campbell, 'Behavior Investigations oI
Superconducting Fault Current Limiters in Power Systems,
IEEE Transactions on applied Superconductivity, vol. 16, no.
2, pp. 662-665, June 2006
|4| J. Yu, X. Duan, 'A new type oI superconducting Iault
current limiter (SFCL), IEEE/PES Transmission and
Distribution ConIerence and Exhibition, vol. 3, pp. 2322-2325,
October 2002
|5| S. R. Lee, J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Yoon, 'A Study on SFCL
Systems Ior Korean Power System Application, IEEE/PES
Transmission and Distribution ConIerence and Exhibition, pp.
1144-1148, May 2006
|6| E. Thuries, V. D. Pham, Y. Laumond. T. Verhaege, A.
Fevrier, M. Collet, and M. Bekhaled, 'Toward the
superconducting Iault current limiter", IEEE Transactions On
Power Delivery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 801-808, April 1991.
|7| W. Paul and M. Chen, 'Superconducting control Ior surge
currents", IEEE Spectrum, vol. 35, pp. 49-54, May 1998.
|8| Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 'Modeling
and protection oI superconducting devices, 2001.
|9| Korea Electric Power Corporation, 'Distribution Practical
, 2006 .
|10| Y. Jiang, S. Dongyuan, D. Xianzhong, T. Yuejin, C.
Shijie, 'Comparison oI superconducting Iault current limiter
in power system, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution
ConIerence and Exhibition, vol. 3, pp. 2322-2325, October
2002
|11| T. Hara, T. Okuma, T. Yamamoto, D. Ito K. Tasaki, and
K. Tsurunaga, "Development oI a new 6.6kV/1500A class
superconducting Iault current limiter Ior electric power
system," IEEE Transaction Power Delivery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp.
182-192, Jan. 1993.
|12| B. Gromoll, G. Ries, W. Schmidt, H.-P. Krmer, P.
kummeth, and H.-W. Neumller, 'Resistive current limiters
with YBCO Iilms", IEEE Transaction Applied
Superconductivity, vol, 7, no. 2, pp. 828-831, June 1997.
|13| Y. Jiang, S. Dongyuan, D. Xianzhong, T. Yuejin, C.
Shijie, 'Comparison oI superconducting Iault current limiter
in power system, IEEE Power Engineering society summer
meeting, vol. 1, pp. 43-47 ,2001
|14| H. Yamaguchi, T. Kataoka, K. Yaguchi, S. Fujita, K.
Yoshikawa, and K. Kaiho, "Characteristics Analysis oI
TransIormer Type Superconducting Fault Current Limiter",
IEEE Transaction on applied. Superconductivity, Vol. 14, No.
2, pp. 815-818, June 2004.