Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Principal Investigator: Dr. Atorod Azizinamini, P.E. Professor and Chairperson Florida International University Miami, Florida Program Officer: Dr. Monica Starnes (2007-2010) Mark Bush, P.E., PTOE (Jan 2011- Dec 2011)
Main Product
Design Guide for Bridges for Service Life,
hereafter referred to as the
Guide.
Provides systematic and general approach for design for service life is developed.
Camera ready copy of the Guide was submitted Feb 2013 Should be available by end of March 2013
AASHTO T-9
Ralph Oesterle, CTL Jointless Bridges Lloryd Sterling Water Proofing Bridge Deck Martin Burke Consultant Jointless Bridges Charles Roeder- University of Washington- Bearings
Concrete Durability Substructures Expansion Joints, Joints and Jointless Structural Steel Protection Concrete Bridges
Survey of DOTs Input of Individuals Outside the Team Analysis of NBI Data
Steel Bridges
Start
Major Categories
Problematic Issues
Chapter 1
Chapter 6
Chapter 11
AASHTO Specifications
ry 1
ry 2 go te Ca Ca te
go
Suggested Topics
Ca
te
go
ry 3
Project main product Design Guide for Bridges for Service Life
Guide is primarily for bridges with spans of less than 300 ft.
However, Guide provides a frame work that could be used to address service life design of any span bridges
Review of bridges that have lasted more than 100 years indicates:
1-
Maintainable and well maintained over their 100year lives due to extreme importance or high capital replacement cost,
2- Originally over-designed
Traditional Approaches
- Service life of bridges in various codes and an - Direct or indirect and isolated form, specifying the use of certain details or properties such as cover thickness, maximum crack width, concrete compressive strength, etc.
GUIDE Approach
- Provide body of knowledge to make decision - Establish array of solutions - Allow incorporating local experiences, practice and preferences - Let designer and owner select the optimum solution
Chapter 1- Design for Service Life: general Framework Chapter 1-This chapter provides an overview of the
approach used in the Guide for design for service life. Chapter 1, also describes terminologies used throughout the guide and various relationships that exist between service life of bridge element, component, subsystem and system and bridge design life as used in AASHTO Specifications. It provides an introduction to the different philosophies used to predict service life. It is essential to read this chapter before proceeding with use of the Guide.
Chapter 2- Bridge System Selection Chapter 2-This Chapter provides a description of various
bridge systems and factors that affect their service life. Chapter includes the description of a general strategy and rational procedure for selecting the optimum bridge system, subsystems, components and elements, considering specific project limitations and requirements, such as climate, traffic, usage and importance. The discussion includes both existing and new bridges, with more detail provided in other chapters
Chapter 5- Corrosion Protection of Concrete Bridges Chapter 5-This chapter provides basic mechanisms
causing corrosion of reinforcement embedded in concrete and strategies for preventing corrosion of reinforcement in concrete bridges
Fe Fe2+ + 2e Fe2+ + 2ClFeCl2 Chloride Contaminated Concrete
FeCl2 + 2OH-
2OH1/ O 2 2
2e -
+ H2O + 2e - 2OH-
Chapter 6- Corrosion Protection of Steel Bridges Chapter 6-This chapter provides descriptions of various
coating systems using paint, galvanizing and metalizing, and descriptions of corrosion resistant steels along with factors affecting their service life. Various options for preventing corrosion of steel bridges and general approaches that could lead to bridge coatings with enhanced service life are presented.
Chapter 7- Fatigue and Fracture Chapter 7-This chapter provides the basics of fatigue
and fracture and factors that cause fatigue and fracture in steel bridges. Various available options to repair observed cracking in steel bridges are also presented
Chapter 8- Jointless Bridges Provides A to Z design of jointless bridges Provides new details- Pin Head Provisions to apply to curved girder bridges Introduces seamless bridge system
HP12x84-Medium Clay
10 9
Pinned-Strong
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
0 50
100
150
200
Abutment
JPCP
Chapter 9- Bridge Expansion Devices Chapter 9- The Guide encourages, eliminating the use of
expansion joints, however, expansion joints may be needed when the total bridge length exceeds practical limits of jointless bridges. This chapter provides description of various expansion joints used in practice, observed modes of failure for each and potential strategies to mitigate them.
100 90
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.00
PTFE Sample #1 PTFE Sample #2 MSM Sample #1 MSM Sample #2 Fluorogold Sample #1 Fluorogold Sample #2
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
= (, , )
() 365 = 2 1 1.33 () 63360
Eq. 1
Eq. 1
() = () 365/5280
() = 1 () 5280 Eq. 4
Eq. 3
(TD) Demand = () + () + ()
100 90
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0.00
PTFE Sample #1 PTFE Sample #2 MSM Sample #1 MSM Sample #2 Fluorogold Sample #1 Fluorogold Sample #2
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
Chapter 11- Life Cycle Cost Analysis Chapter 11-This chapter provides essential information
for incorporating Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) in bridge system, subsystem, component and element selection. This chapter concentrates on general features and elements of incorporating LCCA in the design process, emphasizing consideration of project costs throughout its service life.
Uncertainty in Timing Uncertainty in Construction Cost
Probability Distribution of NPV
bridge elements, components and subsystems, such as traffic, environmental or internal defects and risk to damage.
instance, the corrosion of reinforcement, causing corrosion induced cracking and loss of strength.
assessing risk of damage, through life cycle cost analysis. For instance, use of higher performing materials for sliding surfaces in bearings or use of material prone to deterioration at lower initial cost.
subsystem to the service life of the bridge system and develop appropriate maintenance, retrofit and/or replacement plan.
Footnote Step 5
What is needed to Estimate the Service Life of Bridge Elements, Components and Subsystems
Deterioration Models Examples
x C ( x , t ) Co 1 erf 2 Dct
Fatigue Design Approach in AASHTO LRFD
Caused by Obsolescence
Caused by Deficiency
Load-Induced
Load-Induced
Traffic-Induced Loads
SystemDependent Loads
Fatigue
Overload
Wear
Differential Shrinkage
Thermal
2: Identify Feasible Deck Alternatives Satisfying Design Provisions of AASHTO LRFD, Operational, Site and Bridge System Requirements
3: For Each Alternative, Identify Factors Affecting Service Life Following Fault Tree
Go To A
No
Yes
1A: Identify Individual Factor Affecting Service Life Considering Each Branch of Fault Tree 2A.a: Identify Consequence and Determine Appropriate Strategies for Avoidance or Mitigation
Yes
4A: Modified Bridge Deck Configuration for Deck Alternative under Consideration
Go To B
Operational Category
Traffic capacity requirements Traffic volumes and required capacity Truck volumes Special vehicle uses
HL 93 with typical legal and permit loads No special construction loads Overload with 20 kip tire loads (HL93 truck configuration) Studded tires used in winter
Advantage Readily available material. Accommodates tolerances. Low-cost. Readily available material. Typically prestressed, reducing cracking. Lightweight system. Prefabricated system.
Disadvantage
Requires construction joints between components. Higher initial cost. Requires protective coatings. Difficult tolerance adjustments. High cost. Limited span range. Susceptible to wear without overlays. Susceptible to moisture degradation. High cost. Limited history. Requires overlay for traction.
Lightweight system. Constructible with unskilled labor. Low-cost. Lightweight system. Noncorrosive system.
Corresponding Job Requirements HL93 with 20 kip wheel load, applied once a month
Section 5.3.2.1.1.2
Mitigating Strategy Increase deck thickness Minimize bar spacing for given amount of steel
Advantage Minimizes cracking Improves crack control Minimizes possibility of reinforcement failure Identified in Chapter 3 Protects surface from direct contact with tires Identifies design criteria for establishing stresses
Disadvantage Adds weight to bridge structure, increases cost More labor to install and higher cost May increase area of steel Identified in Chapter 3 Requires periodic rehabilitation every 10 to 20 years Restraining force may cause cracking in deck. Refer to Chapter 8.
24000 ADT NB and SB 5.3.2.1.1.1 and 10% truck volume Studded tires on high 5.3.2.1.1.3 level of service bridge
Design per LRFD Specifications Implement concrete mix design strategies Implement membranes and overlays Develop accurate system model Use low modulus concrete mix design for composite decks Use high creep concrete mix designed for composite decks Develop composite action after concrete has hardened
5.3.2.1.2.3
Use precast deck panels Reactive Ingredients ASR/ACR Coastal Climate Humidity Thermal Climate Freeze/Thaw Local aggregates are reactive RH average 70% Multiple cycles of freeze/thaw expected
Allows additional strain to be Typically lower in strength and may accommodated up to cracking stress be subject to wear and abrasion Uncommon mix design. Difficult to Reduces lockedin stresses assess stress relief Little experience with experimental Allows slippage between deck and systems. Friction reduction difficult supporting members, minimizing to assess. Introduces numerous locked-in stresses construction joints. Grout integrity issues in closed void systems. Allows slippage between deck and Introduces numerous construction supporting members, minimizing joints locked-in stresses Refer to Chapter 3
5.3.2.2.4.1
Use materials and mix designs that Refer to Chapter 3 are not sensitive to aggregate Use materials that are not sensitive Refer to Chapter 3 to moisture content Refer to Chapter 3 for strategies relating to freeze/thaw Refer to Chapter 3 for strategies relating to freeze/thaw
5.3.2.2.2.2
5.3.2.2.1.2
Overload
Fatigue
Wear
System Restraint
Differential Shrinkage
Deicing
Freeze/ Thaw
Salt spray
Humidity
ASR/ACR
Concrete mix
Accurate modeling Concrete mix during Use mix with analysis of low modulus the system
Impermeable Concrete
Stainless steel
Stainless Steel
Stay in place metal deck to protect bottom Deck bottom sealer and top membrane
Increase thickness
Before
Design
Alt. 4 Membrane
Main Feature to address corrosion N/A Impermeable concrete using silica fume Use of 316-stainless steel Increasing concrete cover Using membrane and overlay
Camera ready copy of the Guide was submitted Feb 2013 Should be available by end of March 2013 Atorod Azizinamini aazizina@fiu.edu 402-770-6210