Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes
on
Threshold
Models
Threshold
model
assumes
that
some
dynamics
in
ecosystems
are
not
linear,
i.e.
a
little
change in environment may have very strong effect on the ecosystem’s property, or vice versa.
A threshold may occur when a trigger switches the pull of negative feedbacks from a configu‐
ration (attractor) to another. Common triggers include long‐term abiotic perturbations and
short‐term biotic modification of community structures.
As the theory of ecological resilience develops, threshold model is more and more being
considered as a necessary tool in the studies of ecosystem resilience. The threshold model’s
implication on sudden “flip” of ecosystem state or appearance is exactly what inspired the
originator of ecological resilience concept, C. S. Holling, who studied caterpillar and food’s non‐
linear dynamics.
Despite that ecological resilience theory is increasingly being adopted by ecosystem re‐
searchers and managers worldwide, both in theory and in practice, and as a result threshold
models are relevant in many situations, it must be noted that threshold model cannot be ap‐
plied in all types of ecosystems uniformly. So what kinds of ecosystems are suitable for apply‐
ing this kind of models?
Threshold models can be classified as conceptual models, or applied models. If threshold
models are considered as conceptual, there are two major categories, models without hystere‐
sis and those with hysteresis. Threshold models without hysteresis also have nonlinear behav‐
1 of 5
and recovery, and anticipate—or in the case of degraded There are several types of theoretical models that pre-
systems, overcome—such thresholds. dict threshold dynamics. Particularly applicable are dis-
continuous threshold models without hysteresis
The gap between threshold models in theory and (Figure 1b), where the same response pathway occurs
application regardless of the direction of the environment change
NotesTheory
on Threshold Models (i.e. no hysteresis). In this case, a sudden change in one
Although ecosystem dynamics can be multifaceted, one direction, although discontinuous, could be reversible and
common distinction is between linear continuum responses result in a sudden recovery in the opposite direction.
iour:
small
changes
cause
large
response
near
threshold,
while
in
other
places
large
change
and discontinuous threshold responses (Figure 1). Con- Hysteresis threshold models (Figure 1c), by contrast,
tinuous change models predict that a change in the describe a situation in which there are two or more stable
environment leads to a proportional change in species point attractors (basins of attraction) for one given external
may
have
limited
impact.
The
relationship
between
impact
and
response,
however,
is
of
one
composition. Increasing or decreasing the environmental environmental condition. In this case, because multiple
conditions over time will lead to responses down or up the states occur at one given environmental condition, the
direction,
i.e.
positive
change
causes
only
positive
effect
or
only
negative
effect.
Models
with
same trajectory. Discontinuous threshold models describe pathway to a restored system can be very different from
the situation where changes in environmental conditions the one that led to the degraded state [5].
lead to very little change in species composition or function Ecological theory yields a rigorous and detailed set of
hysteresis
reflects
a
dynamic
that
is
not
only
nonlinear,
but
also
bi‐directional:
in
some
places
until a threshold is reached, when a sudden change in constructs needed to determine whether a system exhibits
composition or function occurs. Ecological theory predicts threshold behavior [19,20]. However, many tests of these
that thresholds (see Glossary) occur when a trigger constructs are hard if not impossible to apply in a practical
positive
change
causes
positive
effect,
in
other
places
positive
change
causes
negative
effect.
switches the pull of negative feedbacks from one attractor setting. For instance, theory indicates that it is important
to another attractor (Figure 1b,c). These triggers are often to demonstrate long-term stability for a period that
either long-term abiotic perturbations that modify site exceeds the lifespan of any one individual, which would
An
illustration
of
these
two
types
of
models
along
with
linear
models
is
given
below.
Figure 1. Alternative models of ecosystem dynamics. Gradual change (a), and two threshold models, non-hysteresis (b) and hysteresis (c). Each square defines possible
relative abundances of two state characters (different species, functional groups or ecosystem processes), which we have labeled assemblage 1 and assemblage 2. Ovals
(Copied
from
Suding,
K.N.
&
Hobbs,
R.J.,
Threshold
models
in
restoration
and
conservation:
a
represent isoclines of standard units of perturbation strength (resilience) and the stars represent attractors. The dotted line in (c) indicates boundaries of basins of attraction.
Each of these isocline graphs is arrayed along an environmental axis. Changes in the isoclines across the environmental gradient represent changes in composition and
stability landscape. Below the isoclines, two-dimensional relationships between the biotic community composition (vertical axis) and environment (horizontal axis) are
shown. Gradual change (a) occurs when there is a linear succession of species or groups along an environmental gradient. Non-hysteresis threshold change (b) occurs
developing
framework.
Trends
in
Ecology
&
Evolution,
In
Press,
Corrected
Proof.
Available
at:
where species composition rapidly changes at a given point on the environmental gradient. Changes in the environmental gradient (or other external drivers) can push a
system from one state to the other. Hysteresis thresholds (c) can occur if there are multiple basins of attraction (states) within the same habitat so that the threshold where
assemblage 1 will decline (collapse) differs from where assemblage 1 will increase (recovery). Human activities can change the frequency and nature of threshold events by
influencing resilience, which can affect the arrangement of isoclines as well as shift the system from one to another type of dynamics (i.e. from [a] to [b] to [c], as indicated
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.012
[Accessed
March
6,
2009].)
by the colored rectangles).
If consider the classification of applied threshold model, there are again mainly two
types: state‐transition model and two‐threshold model. State‐transition model has been
widely applied in ecosystem management practices. Often these models have a number of
states and even more transitions. Transitions at large temporal or spatial scales are often not
easy to address in actual management due to the limit of policy’s valid period and boundaries.
2 of 5
Notes on Threshold Models
The states are usually defined by multiple properties of the system thus are multi‐dimensional.
Two‐threshold model is considered as more suitable for ecosystem management in certain set‐
tings, as it assumes that there is an “easy” threshold that is closer and reversible, and a “hard”
threshold that is more difficult to reach and irreversible, therefore ecosystem managers can
pay more attention on the “easy” threshold without losing sight of the “hard” threshold.
Threshold models are often applied in systems experiencing heavy environmental
changes, and self‐organizing systems, especially those with intransitive networks. This of
course is assuming that heavy environmental changes may directly cause the system to reach
the threshold, and the ability of self‐organizing may be influenced after the threshold is
crossed. The possibility of reaching a threshold to a large extent, and how significant the effect
is after crossing the threshold, determine how successful if a threshold model is applied to the
system.
Applying a threshold model in an ecosystem that is being changed by human may be a
very fruitful attempt. Human can change the system’s threshold dynamics in many ways. They
can change the system’s biotic capacity, by changing the composition of species or their abun‐
dance; they can deprive the system of its biological legacies such as fallen trees and dead
shrub; they can change the connectivity of the system; they can transform transient thresholds
to permanent ones; and last but not least they can change climate. These changes may be
good or bad, but all of them has impact on the threshold of the system.
3 of 5
Notes on Threshold Models
Ecosystems, from a human‐independent perspective, all have certain functions, such as
supporting their components and self‐maintaining. In some of the ecosystems, groups of spe‐
cies can be identified as providing certain functions for the whole ecosystem. These groups are
therefore called functional groups. The importance of functional groups has also been em‐
phasized in resilience theories. In a system with functional groups that influence the system’s
ability to recover, or with functions that respond to diversity changes, these dynamics are im‐
portant in evaluating uncertainty of resilience, and threshold models are especially applicable
in these systems, as crossing the threshold is likely to cause the change of the system’s func‐
tion.
Considering the number of ecosystems being influenced by human, there seems to be
many situations where threshold models can be applied. However, a successful result cannot
always be expected.
Due to the lack of data and proven means of analyzing them, currently many threshold
models are formulated in a heuristic manner. That means the researchers develop a rather
crude model at first, see how well it explains existing data, what factors should be included or
excluded, and revise the model. Such model construction lack rigorous validation of its as‐
sumptions and can hardly be applied to other settings.
Another difficulty is due to lack of tools of monitoring and evaluation, especially when we
consider thresholds at large spatial and temporal scales that cannot be addressed in one’s ca‐
reer life or their allocated area of management. The managers thus cannot confidently apply
4 of 5
Notes on Threshold Models
the result of threshold model. Ignoring a threshold may cause severe consequences, while
jumping at every alarm causes waste of resources.
To improve the applicability of threshold models and the outcomes, the development of
these models should address these issues:
Incorporating some stochasticity to address the uncertain nature of ecosystems;
Evaluating system mechanism controlling restoration or resilience. This calls for better
understanding of ecosystems and resilience;
Evaluating both uncertainty and evidences of threshold behaviour. This calls for collect‐
ing more data and do more analysis of their implications on threshold;
Establishing pattern‐based knowledge, incorporating indicators, monitoring and expert
knowledge;
Developing tests using active adaptive management;
Looking into transient dynamics;
Making use of statistical and analytical tools.
All these issues cannot be addressed by researchers or managers alone. Ecologists,
stakeholders and managers, as well as researchers from other disciplines must combine their
forces to gain meaningful outcomes. Threshold models may be used more widely and wisely in
the future, and its development will enhance our ecological studies.
5 of 5