Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week
12:
A
Look
Back:
The
Vietnam
War
and
the
Cold
War
This
Session
provides
a
retrospective
view
on
the
years
of
the
Vietnam
War
and
also
their
respective
art-
and
literary
scenes.
The
United
States
disastrous
involvement
in
the
Vietnam
War
destroyed
the
trust
of
many
American
people
in
the
government
as
well
as
in
the
military
and
leaves
the
country
deeply
divided.
The
fact
that
it
was
one
of
the
only
wars
that
the
USA
lost
in
a
long
time,
made
the
experience
especially
dramatic.
Several
important
aspects
lead
to
this
negative
perception
of
the
American
people
of
this
war.
First,
the
returning
war
veterans
were
not
celebrated
as
national
heroes
as
they
were
in
previous
wars
like
the
Korea
War,
which
was
under
a
strong
influence
of
the
McCarthy
doctrine.
The
Vietnam
War
however,
was
seen
as
an
unjust
and
unjustified
war,
and
their
participants
as
killers
of
innocent
people.
Second,
and
strongly
influencing
the
latter,
the
extensive
media
coverage
showed
the
people
at
home
a
gritty
and
unadorned
picture
of
the
war,
how
it
was
never
seen
before.
The
saturation
bombing
and
use
of
chemical
weapons
like
Agent
Orange
and
Napalm
shocks
the
nation
and
the
extremely
violent
and
disturbing
images
causes
heavy
protesting.
At
least
since
the
coverage
of
the
Tet
Offensive,
the
war
was
perceived
negatively
of
large
groups
in
America.
The
consequences
of
Agent
Orange
are
still
visible
today,
as
huge
territories
of
the
Vietnamese
jungle
were
destroyed
and
the
chemical
causes
genetic-
and
birth
defects
on
many
generations
of
locals.
Because
there
is
no
convincing
scientific
evidence
of
Agent
Orange
on
the
birth
defects,
the
United
States
never
compensated
the
victims.
Besides
that,
the
war
leaves
50%
of
all
Vietnamese
cities
destroyed
and
a
million
children
as
orphans.
Many
films
discuss
the
trauma
of
the
Vietnam
War,
among
them
also
classic
(anti-)
war
films
like
Apocalypse
Now
(1979),
Platoon
(1986)
and
Full
Metal
Jacket
(1987).
In
the
1967
presidential
election,
Jimmy
Carter
runs
against
Gerald
Ford,
who
granted
draft
evaders
and
deserters
amnesty.
This
act
was
very
controversial
and,
as
the
pardon
of
Nixon,
harmed
his
campaign.
Jimmy
Carter
wins
the
election,
but
he
did
not
manage
the
bad
economy
he
inherited
from
Fords
presidency,
as
the
inflation
and
recession
continued
and
unemployment
and
oil
prices
were
high.
The
Iranian
Revolution
in
1979,
in
which
an
Islamic
regime
replaced
the
last
Persian
shah,
exacerbates
the
oil
crisis
and
the
prices
rise
again.
Ronald
Reagan
defeats
Carter
in
the
1980
presidential
elections.
1
The second part of the session looked at the culture and the arts of the respective
period. Modernism returns in a second wave from Europe after the famous Armory Show in 1917, and hits the US as Abstract Expressionism in the work of the wild ones Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg. This new movement is strongly influenced by the avant-garde and European modernism. For the first time after Cubism in the 1910s and 1920s, artworks became self referential and they were developed towards more surface. Extensive use or thematization of colors, sujets from popular culture and collages characterize this movement. These artists opened the way for a new style, famously represented by Andy Warhol. His new techniques of printing and reproduction created a new concept of original art. Pop Art was also influenced by the media, especially by the press and newspapers and was initially created the be mass produced. Warhol still is and created a cult figure and icon of the American Culture, alongside other Pop artists like Roy Lichtenstein and Keith Haring. They made art for the mass, especially for the American consumer society. Until the 1950, modernism dominated the style in the arts and in literature. Modernism always tried to make it new and thus tried not to follow strict styles and rules. The abstract expressionism and Pop Art however, created a new surface art and helped the rise of postmodernism, which uses history as a toolbox and for quoting styles. The same happened in literature, where authors tried to quote earlier texts and styles to create a new one. Literature and writing became the substance of the very same, thus created a self-reflexive, or intertextual, style of writing. Also, any constructs of norms, rules and theories were free to be ignored in order to bring something new. An important change brings Ferdinand de Saussures linguistic theory of the linguistic turn. The Swiss linguist says, that there is no logical relation between the acoustic image, the signifier, and the mental image, the signified. In short, there is no logical or rational connection between the thing and the describing word, which means that our language is totally arbitrary. If disconnected, no logical method can help us the match the things to the words. As a result, every signification works in a purely negative way. Words differ from each other and thus are predominated to evoke all other signifiers by differing from it. This theory can be adapted to the world, as no experience or perception in rational, but part of a radically negative and differential system. These thoughts are part of the philosophical movement representing postmodernism, which is 2
poststructuralism. Important exponents are Roland Barthes, Jaques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Jean.Francois Lyotard and Jean Baudrillard. In American literature, Susan Sontag writes a controversial and influential text, Against Interpretation, which argues that literature cannot be interpreted, because no interpretation can claim a higher authority than any other. This deconstructive theory implies an instable text with no direct intentions of the author.