S5-17-Bridge Design W ECs Mancini 20121002-Ispra PDF

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC Ispra, 1-2 October 2012
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue: Construction Sector Subgroup
Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

JRC-Ispra, 1-2 October 2012
Organized and supported b O i d d t d by

European Commission
DG Joint Research Centre DG Enterprise and Industry
Russian Federation
Federal Highway Agency, Ministry of Transport
European Committee for Standardization

TC250 Structural Eurocodes
Seismic design of bridges
Prof. Ing. Giuseppe Mancini

Politecnico di Torino Italy Sintecna Ltd - Italy
SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Taller piers work better: Pinerolo bridge
Pier
400 400 100
640
700
Ground level
200250
- longitudinal direction H/LX=10/1=10.0>3.5 - transverse direction: H/LX=10.0/4.0=2.5
150
The height of f the pier has been enhanced to t 10 m b by placing the extrados of the foundation more than 2 m below the ground level. level In such a way we get :
360
qx=3.5 qy=2.5
Pier base section
y x
Pier reinforcement: base and top sections
Pos
Shape
Pos
Shape
Pier reinforcement: base and top sections
Reinforcement under bearings

section i Top view
10
Reinforcement of seismic end of strokes
section
Front view
11
Reinforcement table
12
Seismic end of stroke (on piers and abutments)

Bridge deck
Grouting Neoprene layer 60x40x6.9 cm Sealing
M12 fasteners
M12 fasteners Grouting Neoprene layer 60x40x6.9 cm Steel plate S275 JR Policloroprene (hardness Sh A605) Sealing S li
Steel plate S275 JR Policloroprene (hardness Sh A605)
Abutment or pier
13
Reinforcement cage of g the pier
14
Detail of reinforcement cage at the foot of the pier
15
SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Hysteretic d H t ti damping bearings application: i b i li ti Highway in Algeria
16
General dimensions
Carriageway in direction of Oran
Segments for each half hammer
17
Construction by launching girder
18
Tallest pier 24 m
Ech: 1/50
AXE GEN ER ALE DE L 'A UT OR OU TE
Shortest pier 6.5 m

Ech: 1/50
CHAUSSEE VERS ORAN D AXE GENER ALE DE L'AUTOR OUTE
COUPE A-A AA
AXE D E TRACAGE
COUPE A-A
AXE DE T R AC AGE
CHAUSSEE VERS ORAN
COUPE B-B
Ech: 1/50
COUPE B-B
Ech: 1/50
ALGER
ORAN
ORAN
ALGER
AXE D E LA PILE
AXE DE LA PILE
AXE DE L A PI LE
AXE DE L A PI LE
19
Hysteretic damping bearings scheme
Long. sledge
Trans. sledge
inclination i li ti
20
Longitudinal damper
Front F t view
Top view
21
Front view VUE FRONTALE
Transverse damper
Assonometric view VUE AXONOMETRIQUE
Top view p PLAN
Longitudinal axis of the bridge

A-A (1 : 3)
A
22
Finite element model non linear analysis
23
X axis = East West direction Y axis = North South direction
24
1st Accelerograms
X direction (horizontal) di ti (h i t l)
0.4000
0.3000 0 3000
0.2000
0.1000
ag/g
0.0000 0.00 0 00 5.00 5 00 10.00 10 00 15.00 15 00 20.00 20 00 25.00 25 00
-0.1000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.4000
Time [s]
25
1st Accelerograms
Y direction (horizontal)
0.4000
0.3000 0 3000
0.2000
0.1000
ag/g
0.0000 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
-0.1000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.4000
Time [s]
26
1st Accelerograms
Z di ti (vertical) direction ( ti l)
0.4000
0.3000
0.2000
0.1000
ag/g
0.0000 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
-0.1000
-0.2000 0 2000
-0.3000
-0.4000
Time [s]
27
1st Accelerograms spectrum

X direction (horizontal)
28

Y di ti (horizontal) direction (h i t l)
29

Z direction (vertical)
30
1st Accelerograms
Longitudinal (abutment C1) damper displacements
Displac cement [m m]
Time [s]
31
1st Accelerograms
Longitudinal (abutment C1) damper reaction
For [kN] rce
Time [s]
32
1st Accelerograms
Longitudinal (abutment C1) damper reaction vs. displacement
For [kN] rce
Displacement [m]
33
1st Accelerograms
Transverse Pier P1 damper displacements
Displacement [m m]
Time [s]
34
1st Accelerograms
Transverse Pier P1 damper reaction
Forc [kN] ce
Time [s]
35
1st Accelerograms
Transverse Pier P1 damper reaction vs. displacement
Forc [kN] ce
Displacement [m]
36
Piers dimensions and orientation of the internal actions
M3 M2
37
Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Maximum F1 (axial force) Vertical coordinate along the pier [m] g
Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]
38

Maximum M2 (transverse bending moment) Verti ical coordi inate along the pier [m] g r
39

Maximum M3 (longitudinal bending moment) Vertic coordin cal nate along the pier [m] g
40

Minimum F1 (axial force) Vertic coordin cal nate along the pier [m] g
41

Minimum M2 (transverse bending moment) Vertic coordin cal nate along the pier [m] g
42

Minimum M3 (longitudinal bending moment) Vertical coordinate along the pier [m] g
43
Pier P1 (25m tall) reinforcement (base section)
Pos
Shape
W
44
Pier P1 reinforcement table
Total weight
37019 kg
45
SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Lead-rubber bearings application: Highway in Sicily
46
General dimensions
2 decks made of three 90m spans each with 53m tall piers
47
Two solutions:
Type 1 Type 2
Hysteretic Damping Bearings (HDB) y p g g ( )

Type 2 Type 1
Type 1
Type 2
Type 2
Type 1
Transverse HDB Longitudinal HDB Two direction free bearing
Lead rubber bearings (LRB)
Lead rubber bearing LRB Two direction free bearing
48
Hysteretic damping Bearings

Front view
Type1 fy [kN] fu [kN] y [mm] u [mm] K1 [kN/m] [ ] K2 [kN/m] 1750 2012.5 10 150 175000 1875 Type2 1950 2242.5 10 150 195000 2089.286 Type3 7250 8337.5 10 150 725000 7767.857
Top view
49
Lead rubber bearings
50
51
1st Accelerograms
Xd direction (h (horizontal) l)
ag/g
Time [s]
52
1st Accelerograms
ag/g
Time [s]
53
1st Accelerograms
Z direction (vertical)
ag/g
Time [s]
54

X direction (horizontal) di ti (h i t l)
55

56

Z di ti (vertical) direction ( ti l)
57
1st Accelerograms Lead Rubber Bearings

Pier P2 longitudinal damper displacements
Time [s]
58

Pier P2 longitudinal damper reaction
Forc [kN] ce
Time [s]
59

Pier P2 longitudinal damper reaction vs. displacement
For [kN] rce
Displacement [m]
60

Pier P2 transverse damper displacements
Time [s]
61

Pier P2 transverse damper reaction
Force [kN]
Time [s]
62

Pier P2 transverse damper reaction vs. displacement
Force [kN]
Displacement [m]
63
1st Accelerograms Hysteretic Damper Bearings

Pier P2 transverse damper displacements
Time [s]
64

Pier P2 transverse damper reaction
For [kN] rce
Time [s]
65

Pier P2 transverse damper reaction vs. displacement
Force [kN]
Displacement [m]
66

F1max M2max M3max Vert tical coordinate alon the pier [m] ng r
F1 = axial force M2 = transverse bending moment M3 = longitudinal bending moment
67

F1min M2min M3min Vert tical coordinate alon the pier [m] ng r
68

F1max M2max M3min Vertical coordinate alon the pier [m] ng r
69

F1max M2min M3max Verti ical coordi inate along the pier [m] r
70

F1max M2min M3min Vertical coordinate alon the pier [m] ng r
71

F1min M2max M3max Vertical coordinate alon the pier [m] ng r
72

F1min M2max M3min Verti ical coordi inate along the pier [m] r
73

F1min M2min M3max Verti ical coordi inate along the pier [m] r
74
Pier P1 (53m tall) reinforcement Upper half (front view and vertical section)
75
Pier P1 (53m tall) ( ) reinforcement (section B-B)
76
Pier P1 (53m tall) reinforcement Lower half (front view and vertical section)
77
Pier P1 (53m tall) reinforcement Base (front view and vertical section)
78
Pier P1 ( 3 tall) (53m ll) reinforcement (section A-A) A A)
79
Pier P1 (53m tall) reinforcement table

Pos Shape Sh
80
Thank you for the kind attention

S5-17-Bridge Design W ECs Mancini 20121002-Ispra PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

S5-17-Bridge Design W ECs Mancini 20121002-Ispra PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes JRC Ispra, 1-2 October 2012

EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue: Construction Sector Subgroup

Seminar Bridge Design with Eurocodes

Organized and supported b O i d d t d by

European Committee for Standardization

Seismic design of bridges

Prof. Ing. Giuseppe Mancini

SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Taller piers work better: Pinerolo bridge

400 400 100

- longitudinal direction H/LX=10/1=10.0>3.5 - transverse direction: H/LX=10.0/4.0=2.5

Pier base section

Pier reinforcement: base and top sections

Pier reinforcement: base and top sections

Reinforcement under bearings

Reinforcement of seismic end of strokes

Seismic end of stroke (on piers and abutments)

Grouting Neoprene layer 60x40x6.9 cm Sealing

Steel plate S275 JR Policloroprene (hardness Sh A605)

Reinforcement cage of g the pier

Detail of reinforcement cage at the foot of the pier

SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Hysteretic d H t ti damping bearings application: i b i li ti Highway in Algeria

Segments for each half hammer

Construction by launching girder

Shortest pier 6.5 m

CHAUSSEE VERS ORAN

Hysteretic damping bearings scheme

Front view VUE FRONTALE

Top view p PLAN

Longitudinal axis of the bridge

Finite element model non linear analysis

Finite element model non linear analysis

X axis = East West direction Y axis = North South direction

1st Accelerograms spectrum

1st Accelerograms spectrum

1st Accelerograms spectrum

For [kN] rce

For [kN] rce

Piers dimensions and orientation of the internal actions

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 design internal actions Seismic combination

Internal action F1=N[kN] M2,M3 [kNm]

Pier P1 (25m tall) reinforcement (base section)

Pier P1 reinforcement table

SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Lead-rubber bearings application: Highway in Sicily

Hysteretic Damping Bearings (HDB) y p g g ( )

Transverse HDB Longitudinal HDB Two direction free bearing

Lead rubber bearings (LRB)

Lead rubber bearing LRB Two direction free bearing

Hysteretic damping Bearings

Lead rubber bearings

Finite element model non linear analysis

1st Accelerograms spectrum

1st Accelerograms spectrum