Confidential Fraud

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *
family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org MensAid dadscare.htm theyknow.htm contract.htm sheknows.htm forward.htm converts.htm
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk /4suckers.htm /beware.htm /confraud.htm /solfraud.htm /4deceit.htm /convicti.htm chancellor.htm dssfraud.ht

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & CORRUPT ACTIVITIES IN FAMILY COURTS (*Link *Link also
from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for the targeted family)

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides
through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in
dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit plus exhibits and

letters to a Chief Inspector of Police,
one to solicitors and another to the Lord Chancellor
Spell ORGANISED CRIMES (read the letter to the police in September 2006)
* I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the
Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister :

wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential
and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not
through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt
and bankrupt public services. * [*Link to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions
received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES *Link thereafter to the Prime
Minister's reference to the issue of Organised Crime in June 2005]

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (1 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS: -
Announcement- July 2002 1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as maintenance engineers of the Divide &
Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self-appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm - /4deceit.htm - /corruptcourts.htm - /convicti.htm - /chaldep1.htm -
/ukmm.htm & other organised groups who only aim to help themselves & serve the Fraudsters Club as in this page we cover, either from within or as guided (by the abductors and
rapists of Justice) accomplished mischief makers and recruits to CIUKU Enterprises. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their
OBLIGATIONS in law provide, namely: - REPORT CRIMES & CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. [*Link to relevant law & provisions]

confraud.htm KEY
Page Changes 8 Oct. 2006 Confidential Fraud *Page Created October 1999* (page dedicated to the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM & the FnF)
This Page is DEDICATED
Page Revised: February 23, 2009 : Introduced links to page from the page where we challenge & expose one Maurice Kellett, a self-promoting
alleged expert on the parts of 'The Brotherhood', the contributions of Freemasons in 'building the society' he has been bolstering for over 10
years that we know of.
Site re-construction for better navigation and inclusion of additional material.
HELP US TO HELP YOU
Please (*Link to plea). Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the re-construction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are
endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This
JOIN includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
others On Line and publish your
Statement of Facts and the NOTE: The message below succinctly qualifies and clarifies the fact that citizens in the United Kingdom, and more than likely in other
Evidence you have. European countries and allegedly civilised West Influenced Pseudodemocracies, meet the cost of the rampant fraud covered in this
(Member's case at the
European Court on Human
page/file, through taxes AND THEY ARE KEPT IN THE DARK BY THE GOVERNMENTS THEY ELECT, to manage (on their
Rights - paves the way TO behalf) *their country's affairs*. There exists an even darker side to the concept and the 'plans for the serfs in all pseudodemocracies';
PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused victims of the legal circles and public servants (including the judiciary) entertain the invitation we point to below and themselves,
through abusive use of the
thereafter, join the organisers of it all in and for 'the plundering of the family silver'. (*F3)
courts in allegedly civilised
Democratic States. Victims do
not know that IT IS ALL In effect the arrangements in place, 'the condition' we point to below, amount to blackmail and it leads to conscious acquiescence of
ORGANISED by the very blunt frauds through the courts. Compensation paid to persons who succumb to the blackmail stipulation that we cover in this page
circles who have been
constitutes also acceptance of fraudulently created demands on the budget, by the legal circles and judges who actively engage in the
arranging all of humanity's
TRIBULATIONS FOR type of activities, such as we cover in another page. In that instance (as with other cases that we were made / are aware of) THE
THOUSANDS of years) ACTIVITIES AMOUNT TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS : the defaults, omissions and contempt for the evidence and the law leading
Use your rights in law (link) and
to the compensation paid to the victims merely because judicial chair occupants freely indulge in contempt of the law and the rights
ACT with others against the assured through it.
offenders. Join others and chip
in for the creation of the mass
of evidence against abusers of OUR attempts (on several occasions) to publish the facts stated below, in the newsgroups, benefited from the attention of the
public office : the abductors and moderators who used their guillotine & scissors. Arrogant violations in contempt of our rights to publish and act, as we do, in the
rapists of Justice. You can then
benefit from THE FACTS & public interest and as international law provides. Others, who frequent the newsgroups, also obstructed and interfered with the
THE EVIDENCE that you will aforesaid rights; they do so either as the stooges of the offenders or as their partners in the deception and the constructive fraud
help establish. It can all be industry we cover in this page/file.
used in any action, severally or
jointly with others, as the case
may be . Crimes against Below the REASON behind the propagation and perpetuation of fraud and corruption in and through our legal system. Most
humanity are not ruled out
when a large number of citizens probably the same scenarios apply in other signatory countries of the European Convention on Human Rights.
can come up with evidence and
as victims concur and or
expand upon on the FACTS RECOGNISE THE FOUNDATION STONE, upon which rests the silence* of 'the real shysters' from within the United Kingdom.
STATED & The VIOLATIONS [*Link from here to a House of Lords precedent case when their Lordships addressed the issue of conspiracy and what silence amounts to in
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (2 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
PLEADED as LODGED at the matters of deception & FRAUD]. Consider therfore the REAL reasons why:-
ECoHR, already.
Read first in this page the ● 'alleged victims of the system'
statement in respect of the
case as submitted to the
● engage, behind the scenes, in many an act of 'hypocrisy and sycophancy',
court and how / what we ● they relish in 'evil-mongering' behind the scenes and,
were prepared for, in ● in private, they promote and assert 'many a foul word about the treatment they were/are subjected to, to new victims they meet
order to establish one's and target!!!
and for all the elements ● And CONVENIENTLY the poor dears DO NOTHING ABOUT THEIR COMPLAINTS, while
and the evil forces at
work. [*Link)
● seeking to entice others in new-found areas of deceitful and fraudulent activities (*Link)
● through which (activities) the perpetuation of that which they set out to raise complaints about in the first instance, including
Read the Statement of lodging their complaints to the ECoHR.
facts & Legal Argument
by and for the Chairman
of Live Beat Dads UK The all important and crucial word, in the part we publish below, happens to be:
(*Link to www.lbduk.org.
Do not fail to note the *** "confidential" ***
rights pleaded under par.
5.a & 5.b in the case of a
relationship gone astray,
In other words:
merely because the other
side felt the urge and ● "YOU MUST NOT DISCLOSE THIS" ! [*Link from here to a House of Lords ruling on 'conspiracy', secret agreements]
need for a change of ● "YOU MUST KEEP QUIET ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT" !! [*Link from here to ]
dildo/ partner. Thereafter
● "The taxed contributors to the funds we are using - THE SUCKERS, must not get to know of this facility" !!!
ONE & ALL decided to
use the innocent children ● "Remember we have just BOUGHT YOUR SILENCE" !!!!
as the vehicle for use in ● "*** WELCOME TO THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB !!! ***" !!!!!
and for the conversion of ● "Remember, THE SYSTEM, IS SUPPORTED BY THE MEDIA. [*Link to promotion of falsehoods & sold to the system stooges]
assets through the courts,
as targeted by the
operators of the Divorce
Friends get to know of the fact that Article 38 - provides:
Industry, a division of
CIUKU Enterprises! ● "1. If the court declares the application admissible, it shall:
● (a) pursue the examination of the case, ...........
THE ABOVE IS ● (b) place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a
DEDICATED TO view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the
ALLEGED LEADERS OF basis of RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS as defined in the
VICTIMS of Family Convention and the protocols thereto.
Courts. To all others who
FAILED to co-operate &
● 2. PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED UNDER PARAGRAPH 1.b
WILFULLY INTERFERED SHALL BE 'confidential'."
IN ORDER TO
OBSTRUCT & MAINTAIN
the system of operations,
>>> We underlined, above, the words 'respect for human rights' for the simple reason that the craft-y who 'allegedly' were
which includes their parts concerning themselves with such elements COULD NOT CARE LESS about the rights of the citizens who are called upon to meet,
as MAINTENANCE through taxes, the constructive frauds on Mr and Mrs Average for the maintenance of public servants who entertain the corrupt and
ENGINEERS (see below). fraudsters who operate in our courts freely and as the police endorse and promote through defaults and omissions. <<< (*F5)

We invite you to take part

in DATA collection in the In a nutshell

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (3 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
areas covered by The
CAMILA Project. Your
own contributions are and
will be of value to all
victims who are active
now & to all others who,
like you we hope, will be
challenging the offenders
by using the rights we
point to, assured in law.
Link to exclusive USE OF
SUCH MATERIAL for
VERY SUCCINCT
CHALLENGES that
caused abusers of the
courts facilities to
abandon their plans for a
targeted victim - family.
Victims of the family
courts can refer to the
cases we point to, above
and they can invite us
as witnesses to any
court proceedings IF
THEY FIRST STATE
THEIR OWN CASE
IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN thereby
indicating their own
approval &
participation in the
declared AIMS of our
founder as other
victims adopted.
Interesting Press Release!
It was published months
late in the local press. The
release months AFTER
submissions to the
Treasury, to the Prime
Minister and press barons.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (4 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
● YOU, friends, pay for THE FAT SALARIES of those who are RETAINED, ON YOUR BEHALF, and meant to protect you
from crime and criminals.
● THEY, your servants, indulge in criminal activities with persons who operate from within the circles they, your servants, arose
to occupation of judicial chairs.
● YOU, friends, then fork out for the silence of their new 'silent partners in the sharing of the budget funds, earmarked for the
'best legal system in the world, part of the CIUKU Enterprises, in the hands of the best organised STINGRAY OPERATORS.
ALL care of those who hold the all important positions of:
● Minister for the police - Home Secretary
● 'Minister' for Judicial & Court Services - Lord Chancellor
● AND
● The Attorney General,
● The Director of Public Prosecutions,
● The Crown Prosecution Service,
● The Serious Fraud Office
● The Public Auditors
● The *fraudsters club recruits* we name and expose in our pages
NOT FORGETTING of course:
● The Condescending MEDIA BARONS
● AND THEIR STOOGES = reporters/editors [*Link to FOOTNOTE where we cover very important cases that establish duplicity of purpose and if not
organised crimes against humanity simply the element of free for all by split personalities who know not the rudiments and basic principles of law].
● Access the case STATED at the European Court of Human Rights and recognise the scenario. We have publishing particulars
and an important challenge arising out of the evidence 'the stooge of a victim' provided us with the solicitors and the courts she
was working with while of opinion that they could all go on fooling us as they fool all others. The affidavit used by the fraudsters
and other applicable evidence in the case did lead to our submissions to the Treasury in February 2002. Three properties were
being converted to legal costs through theatrical productions over a few years; in one instance a FORGERY was used and plenty
of False Instruments that were lacking accountability (by the authors / creators) used for the conversion / theft of the properties.
ALL THE WHILE THE ALLEGED VICTIM part and parcel of the activities and as an ass, abusing our time wilfully negating
on her agreement with us. She was simply using our assistance and facilities only for the reward under the table; one whose aims
were to work as just another maintenance engineer of the arrangements in place, like those who sent along and guide the LIPS
crowd/mob. Testing our resolve and patience, using our facilities for her and their fraudulent activities, her evil objectives. [*Link
to the page we released in 2004. There we publish the evidence against her and those she had been and was working with as a lover of the practices and as a committed
'fraudsters club recruit, like her mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob].
Now, consider those you knew and know of, WHO ACCUSE Mr and Mrs Average as shysters, because Mr and Mrs Average do not
take up arms to challenge the maladministrators/operators of the legal, system in our country! In the meantime the 'shyster', name
calling advocates', know full well that no one bothers to inform Mr and Mrs Average, of that which the advocates and the media
barons shove under the carpets and or in the family closet. In the meantime some of the shyster name-calling 'gurus' [*Link to a page where
we cover some aspects and a minor part of our experiences with one such guru'] having joined the fraudsters' club, we cover above, busy obstructing
others from exercising their rights in law, to INFORM & EDUCATE the uninformed and kept in the dark 'serfs', the taxpayers. The
most fundamental of rights such 'gurus' obstruct and object to, just the EXPOSURES AND THE EVIDENCE WE ARE (AND THEY
SHOULD BE) PUBLISHING FOR THE WORLD TO NOTE and recognise the unacceptable activities of the criminals who are in
Confidential Fraud
control of our legal system, the courts and the police. [*Link from here to an explicit extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight, 'The
Brotherhood'].

You read, above, the explicit and succinct provisions of Article 38 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Consider, therefore
why there exist among those who

● visit the newsgroups,

● blow their trumpets about 'the system',
● proclaim their disaffection and
● 'disgust at the practices' in the courts,
● in order to attract / phish new victims to whom they
● assert personal knowledge and experiences,
● YET FAILED AND OR FAIL TO PUBLISH ANY EVIDENCE
● in ANY WEB-SITE, through which to
● inform and prove to
● Mr and Mrs Average of that which they profess knowledge of!!!
● YET they fail to challenge & expose abusers of judicial chair occupation and the courts facilities, as we do.
● In the meantime, and for over 12 YEARS, the leaders / managers of the LIPS crowd/mob ignoring provisions of The Criminals
Justice Act 1988, we pointed them to, as soon as they contacted Andrew, when they got to know of 'The CAMILA Project'. [*Link
from here to the page where we publish the relevant Sections of the Act that clarifies : the commission of the crime irrelevant if through an ACT OR AN OMISSION].

WHO BUT THE REAL SHYSTERS, are party to the above fraud on YOU, Mr and Mrs Average?

Read the article from the North London weekly Post (Link) and consider that persons who run around promoting the abuse of the courts' facilities are
just promoting the criminal activities when they default at the same time to challenge the obvious, in the public domain. When they promote also the
defaults and omissions by and from other public servants AND OFFER to assist any victim it is a sure sign that the promoter / volunteer is but an
endorser of the wrongs and criminal activities. In the circumstances failing to challenge and expose the wrongs IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN leads to
'conscious accessories and abettors to new criminal activities especially because they offer to assist any other to benefit from the arrangements
And the victims(!) who just covered above.
default to act as law
abiding citizens, aim for
membership of the WE DO HAVE EVIDENCE that one such person was more interested in persuading a victim, who was publishing the facts of life on the Internet, to
fraudsters' club, we cover remove the evidence. The culprit acted deviously and promoted falsehoods about a mate of his; none other than Johan, the telephone call instigator
in this page. Joining in the and the Rt. Hon. Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob Norman Scarth. The latter, had joined the fraudsters club and he later persuaded the publishing
scams, as seasoned and victim to remove the evidence from the Internet. At the same time he deceived(?) and caused(!) the victim, who benefited from much, to interfere in our
tutored recruits for more of work. Another, victim, was also caused to join in the scam orchestrated by the 2 LIPS protagonists in deception. OF SUCH PERSONS His Lordship was
the same with new victims speaking when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999, about his baby, the Legal Services Commission the wolf
in the scripts prepared for (Legal Aid Pack) re-packaged as the Legal Services Commission.
them. The enterprising
who are in control of Law We urge all conscientious citizens, who have suffered damages, at and through the courts, because of the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM,
Enforcement in our to consider their rights and to act as the law provides. Access the page for information on how to challenge, expose and claim back rights denied &
country as contemptuous obstructed as part of a group who has seen light. [*Link from here to page with information]
of the law as the criminals
they were / are retained to
Go To: http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/attempts.htm & read the APPEAL (specifically the last order sought on appeal) because it caused
deal with. Do access the
Divorce Lawyer Admits the Lord Chancellor and the Government to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997. Such FACTS & REALITIES while the persons who contacted Andrew,
Fraud page/file. Then as leaders and managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd/mob, were just looking forward to AND WORKING FOR MORE OF THE SAME, using others
consider that the victim in for the conscious and intended double constructive frauds on the taxpayers that we point to, expose and cover exclusively in this page.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (5 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
that case indulged in
many a deception and If you have the evidence against the offenders, you can publish it in your personal web-site as your rights in law provide.
theatre. More facts and
evidence are to be
Every citizen is duty bound to report crime and if the police ignored or ignore you, USE YOUR RIGHTS, EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS who act in
published in our pages. It
was but a typical example contempt of the law.
of the scenarios enacted
by such persons through Visit the Stephen Lawrence page (Link) and note how Parliament provided for your rights, yet, our Law Enforcement Agencies simply ignore such
the courts, care of the provisions. They fail to protect you as the law and their duties provide. Through their defaults and blunt omissions, in the exercise of their public duties,
TRIAD in control of it all. they actually torment and torture you, the victims of crime. Precisely as they did in the Stephen Lawrence shameful fiasco. Their failures to prosecute
Through the exclusive the playmates of the local authority, the scoundrels who steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds, through false instruments is but a typical
exchanges with another example of 'which parties they serve in an alleged democracy, one that is sold to the world (through self promotion) as one that allegedly rests and is
who had other plans for founded on 'Law & Order'.
the system which they
allegedly were all out to READ OF SUCH PROVISIONS and exercise your rights! Challenge and EXPOSE THE VILE OFFENDERS, who endorse and promote crime through
expose and raise the red defaults and omissions in the purported exercise of their public duties, AS YOUR SERVANTS.
flags for, both as far
removed from the
exposures as the earth Remember:
from the centre of the "Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which you do, does not infringe upon and or violate the rights of
universe. Neither one was
any other". © A.Y, 1972-1975 'The Years of Discovery'.
all out for that which they
were asserting and
alleging in private. Both ● CAN the parties who fall within the above category, ever, really justify and or explain their conscious part in the constructive frauds industry?
after the scenario covered ● CAN 'the real shysters' STATE IF, before electing to join 'the fraudsters club' THEY CONSIDERED THE ABOVE SIMPLE FOUNDATION FOR
in this page. Seasoned ALL LAW & HUMAN RIGHTS, as defined by the founder of *human-rights* the Non Governmental Organisation?
mimics and creators of ● 'One Begins With Logic' : Heraclitus' principle as interpreted by Andrew when a teenager, and ever since the basis of all that touched his life. (In
theatrical scripts. Greek: sounds like "N R He In Oh Law-was")
● We publish in the left margin/window the names of allegedly concerned citizens. The majority, if not all, have been serving the system as is as
Below, a typical example 'Subliminal Indoctrination Agents' for 'the system as is' and the subconscious promotion of 'the powers of the abductors and rapists of Justice'.
of HOW SOLICITORS We explain: 'They bombard the victims they target (inclusive of postings in the News Groups) in order to draw their readers' attention to 'their
WORK with one another views'. The opinions' they promote, relentlessly, simply act as indirect 'conclusive proof' that there is nothing 'the serfs' can do. The proof lays in
and use clients in order to the obvious messages that are derived from their repetitious promotions of: "Do not do as I did and do, because they -the criminals who ARE in
engineer constructive control in pseudo-democracies- will do to you, what they did to me'. The best and classic example being none other than the puke production
frauds on the budget machine, James Todd of 'VOMIT' repute.
through the scheme &
arrangements in place
which we cover in this
page.
Official records: Addenda in the right lower corner of the box
Their audacity knows no
bounds.
One solicitor to another
cover it all NOTE: Friendly settlement followed by removal of the petition from the list. In the
meantime letters to the fraudsters-club-recruits alleging case did not qualify, ha, ha!
"Oh, no, we do not want
an offer from you for the
damages you caused to
our client. We expect of
the taxpayers to make
good the damages AND
OUR CLIENT AGREES
WITH US. He decided to
join 'the fraudsters club'

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (6 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
for the usual operations
through the courts. We
can all (the legal circles)
point him to our victims,
just as we pointed Mr.
Hussein, the one who
initiated him - Mr Johan M
R Foenander - to our
system of operations.
Let the above realities be
a lesson to non-legal
Members of Parliament
and to other charlatans
whose plans are to cash
in / use the system as is
just like the fraudsters
club recruits we name in
our pages.
Above what one convert
to and lover of the blunt
fraud on the taxpayers
engaged in. Below just
another dreamer who
engaged in many
theatrical productions,
simply for the creation
of false instruments with
the attached legal costs
charges. The obvious
hinted at to the fraud of
an alleged victim -
challenger. Intriguing
she too, conveniently
DID NOT proceed with
the exposures she agreed
to engage in with
assistance in order to
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (7 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
ALL law abiding citizens who object to being treated as serfs of the Middle Ages or as slaves of earlier
times, all family persons who have been struggling to raise their off-spring, all creative and aspiring
peoples everywhere, are invited to read very carefully the content of this page and access also the
Readers & researchers are challenge to the European Court of Human Rights* [*Link from here to the challenges & NOTE THE LAW
requested to access the
pages where we expose pointed to the European Court of Human Rights] after reading the entire content of this page.
named lovers and
promoters / users of the ● The challenge was called for after the Court, through its UK section staff and officers wrote to
arrangements in place for inform a victim of the organised RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE
more of the same.
COURTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, that the three judges, who looked at the case (after the
This link takes visitors to
rapporteur passed the case file on) determined that not all avenues had been exhausted in the United
such a scenario, a letter in
the left margin. Read the Kingdom, the case could not be accepted. [*Link to the process in respect of the admissibility and who / how determines -
note singular]
evidence in the form of a
letter from one solicitor to ● The petitioner was also informed, by the court, that the submitted documents / file would be
another and note the destroyed in a year's time, HENCE THE CHALLENGES to the Court .
implied arrogance of the ● The petitioner had been informed that the pleadings were presented to the court in a way that after
solicitor. DO NOTE THE the door had been opened (court received the petition) the usual smoke-screen could not be applied.
FAIR COMMENT warranted ● AFTER the challenge was received and the documents were rushed back to the 'victim'(!), the
and DO NOT OVERLOOK
THE SIMPLE FACT that
petitioner was asked to issue a Power of Attorney to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order that the case
could be progressed accordingly, at national level & within Europe.
'the victim' in that instance
was contacted by another ● The petitioner 'honoured her agreement with Mr A. Yiannides', the founder of human-rights by
fraudster who was sent delivering up to him all of her documents, and left the United Kingdom without ever bothering to
along by solicitors in order issue the warranted and agreed upon Power of Attorney, which Mr Yiannides needed in order to
to initiate that moron to the proceed as HE HAD PLANNED at the time when he was settling the pleadings which he personally
system of operations as
delivered to the European Court of Human Rights by travelling all the way to Strasbourg, by coach.
covered in this page. the
(No prizes for guessing why)
circumstances. Victims,
researchers are invited to ● A STATEMENT by Mr. Andrew Yiannides will be released in due course because the promotion
contact the founder of and propositions by the English Section at the European Court were more than out of order when
human-rights, Mr Andrew one considers THE PLEADINGS AS DELIVERED TO & LODGED AT THE COURT, WITH THE
Yiannides for additional SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.
information. The addenda in
● Readers / researchers and or any person who takes an interest in the matters we cover in this page &
the right hand lower corner
covers the elements this
specifically any media baron or conscientious reporter who wishes to assist with promotion and
page relates to. [NOTE: exposure of the realities covered in this page should read the copyright notice at the bottom of all
Readers should consider the pages at this web-site and contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides / the webmaster. (Read below the provisions
above before accepting
and practice under Article 28 before the UK was caused to introduce the Bill of Rights after a Local Authority was
promotions by alleged victims
challenged for its parts in arrogant fraud on targeted citizens because of its liabilities / duties to assist in the
whose cases allegedly were
thrown out by the ECrtHR] creation of the melting pot as determined and commanded by non-elected 'dictators' of the most obnoxious and
evil kind - followers of the pre-determined plans for the sons of men -humans- of planet earth).
Confidential Fraud
attend to her
OBLIGATIONS to
society, the taxpayers as
provided for under
Article 6 of the
European Convention
on Human Rights [*Link
to the relevant provisions
under Art. 6]
*Link from here to the
page where we state the
parts of the dreamer
who was acting in
tandem with the legal
circles. She also failed to
report a blunt
PERJURY, on affidavit,
by the solicitor who was
representing, on S.I.F
instructions, the
solicitors the dreamer
instigated proceedings
against.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (8 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
FOOTNOTE SPECIAL relative to the above material and evidence
Readers & researchers are pointed to the fact that the United Kingdom, at the conclusion of World War 2 hostilities, had to borrow
funds from the USA banking leeches in order to rebuild and restructure the country and society. Loans with USA government support;
the usual guarantees to the leeches from and by 'the representatives of the serfs' in all pseudo democracies; governments (agents of the
citizens), committing the serfs to meet the cost of all interest charges and the capital (borrowed funds) through taxes. In the instance at
hand the funds were called for and warranted in order for the government of the day to proceed with its plans for these islands and its
inhabitants. WE SIMPLY POINT OUT THAT THE LOAN WAS NOT PAID OFF UNTIL 2007, some 62 years later. THE SERFS
ARE REMINDED REGULARLY (by the media and the opposition of the respective political coloration representatives of the day)
THAT THE STATE / COUNTRY IS RUN & MANAGED ON EXTENSIVE BORROWINGS granted by the leeches..... and WE
HAVE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS RELISHING & WORKING FOR THE PLUNDERING OF TAXPAYERS
CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGH THE ORGANISED RAMPANT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE
COURTS FACILITIES WE POINT TO IN THIS PAGE. We publish and point - in other pages- to additional evidence applicable to
the blunt and arrogant criminal activities such persons engage in as 'the dancing partners of the abusers of the courts facilities' >>> a
typical example the letter from one solicitor to another in the left margin / window linked to from here [*L1]. The very solicitor, years
earlier, engaged with another solicitor in attempts to convert rents owing to a landlord care of organised fraud instigated through
abuse of public office by staff and officers (in charge of the organised disorganisation in full swing at Haringey Council, a Local
Authority / Local Government, in North London) linked to from here [*L2].
Legal blunder or organised FRAUD on 'the taxpaying serfs' ?
Daily Mail, Saturday, May 24, 2003 - the John Palmer: Timeshare scam
Legal blunder ?
Error ?
Goldfinger' to keep £33m in legal blunder
By Alexandra Buller
ONE of Britain's most notorious criminals will be allowed to pocket more than £33 million from his timeshare
scams because of an error by judges.
John `Goldfinger' Palmer was jailed for eight years in 2001 for tricking thousands of holidaymakers out of
their life savings.
He was ordered to pay back the haul but appealed and was allowed to keep the money after the judge's
confiscation order was overturned by the Appeal Court last July.
Yesterday Lord Woolf, Britain's most senior judge, ruled that this decision was wrong and that the appeal
judges had `misunderstood and misapplied the law'.
But Palmer can still keep the fortune he made from the Tenerife timeshare scam because the original decision
to quash the confiscation order cannot legally be overturned.
Confidential Fraud
Legal blunder or
organised FRAUD on
the taxpayers?
Access the article in
HTML (Links to & from) in
the main window, read it
all, also the FOUR
comparative cases that
we point to in the
FOOTNOTE. CONSIDER
then the parts of the
Fraudsters Club Recruits
we expose and covered in
this page. In the final
analysis one MUST
CONSIDER the self
created roles of the
judiciary to act as the
Protectors Of CRIMINALS
(*Link to proof).
BELOW two explicit
articles both of which
mainline news AFTER we
reported to the
government the activities
in which a victim(?) of the
legal circles and the
abusers of judicial chair
occupation, WAS
OBSERVED & NOTED
TO HAVE BEEN
PLAYING THE FIELD
FOR THE RAMPANT
CORRUPTION AS
COVERED IN THIS
PAGE. (*Link to the page
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (9 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Last night Norman Brennan, a serving police officer and director of the Victims of Crime Trust, said: `Who
has got any faith left in the British criminal justice system?
`Who said crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer.
`A lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives lost their life savings and at the end of the day his
sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway.
`Now Palmer is sticking two finger up to all of us and the courts are allowing him to do it.'(*Link to other arrogant
fraudsters that we wrote of in late 1999, who were sticking their two fingers up to the taxpayers who pay taxes to maintain criminals in judicial chairs and
contemptuous of the law 'Law Enforcing Agents').
Palmer, 53, was ordered to pay back £33,243,812 after being convicted at the Old Bailey of conspiracy to
defraud thousands of victims - mainly elderly people.
But this order was overturned by the Appeal Court on the basis that there had been crucial flaws in the
procedure followed.
Lord Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday said the case had been 'wrongly decided' and Palmer was not
entitled to the money. But the crook will still be able to keep it because the appeal judges last November
blocked an attempt by the Director of Public Prosecutions to take the case to the House of Lords - the only
court with power to quash the ruling.
The decision in Palmer's case sparked panic in prosecution circles and Lord Woolf said there had been `at
least ten' test cases on the issue.
He ruled that Palmer's case had been wrongly decided, during a hearing of another confiscation case
involving VAT fraud before a specially constituted five-judge Appeal Court.
Lord Woolf said: `This Court considers that the law was misunderstood and misapplied in Palmer.'
He said it was `not a course to be taken lightly' for a court to rule that a `series of cases' had been decided
wrongly, but said he hoped that this would `put an end to the string of appeals' against confiscation orders
sparked by the Palmer case. (*F4)
Palmer earned notoriety and the nickname `Goldfinger' after being acquitted of handling gold from the
Brink's-Mat robbery at Heathrow in 1983.
After his acquittal he moved to Tenerife and set up the time-share business with his lover Christine Ketley, of
Brentwood, Essex, who was also convicted of conspiracy to defraud.
His victims in the timeshare fraud handed over more than £30 million, but never received their share of a
holiday home in the sun.
Palmer's wealth was estimated at around £270 million last year by the Sunday Times Rich List, making him
one of Britain's wealthiest men.
He is a close friend of Kenneth Noye and is believed to have flown him to the safety of the Spanish coast by
helicopter after Noye stabbed Stephen Cameron to death on the M25 in 1996.
a.buller@dailymail.co.uk © Associated Newspapers Ltd.
Confidential Fraud
where we cover the
activities & publish
evidence that establishes
Arrogantly ORGANISED FRAUD on the taxpayers [*Link]
the victim's parts in the
● On the left image of the cover of the 1996 edition of the Convention as posted
constructive frauds & Link
to an affidavit covering the
to petitioners by the Commission. On the right image from page 8 where
billions paid out annually
Article 28 made clear the Commission's practice. All had been and was in
as rewards in many conformity with the universal declaration and COMMITMENT TO THE
instances to persons who PRINCIPLE THAT JUSTICE SHOULD BE SEEN TO BE DONE. [Read below]
play the field in tandem ● The principle simply shoved under the carpets, the media barons and the
with the legal circles). Intellectual Prostitutes we contacted over the years (as of 1972), have been
shoving their heads in the sand and acting as accessories and abettors by The provision and the
suppressing the realities born of the Constructive frauds through abuse of practice under Article 28
public office as we cover also in the Housing Benefit organised fraud, by staff very clearly stated in
and officers of Local Authorities. 1996. The fundamental
● Worse, alleged victims who knew and know of the blunt confidential principle as practised at
Convention & Protocols to and by the Commission
it, a list of States & Dates plundering of budget funds as covered in this page, contemptuously
MAKING IT VERY CLEAR
of Recognition of The suppressing their own knowledge of the abused facility AS LOVERS & THAT THE TAXPAYERS
Rights Of Citizens As USERS OF IT ALL whose priorities shifted from, "Challenge the abusers of WERE DULY INFORMED
INDIVIDUALS TO the courts' facilities, to active participants and promoters / users of the system OF PETITION &
SUBMIT PERSONAL RESULTS
PETITIONS TO THE
as is'.
ECHR

Article 28
1. In the event of the Commission accepting a petition referred to it:

● a. it shall, with a view to ascertaining the facts, undertake together with the representatives of the parties an examination of the petition and, if
need be, an investigation, for the effective conduct of which the States concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities, after an exchange of
Access the realities as to views with the Commission.
● b. it shall at the same time place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the
how and when the press
basis of respect for human rights as defined in this Convention.
release, below, by the
government.
2. If the Commission succeeds in effecting a friendly settlement, it shall draw up a report which shall be sent to the States concerned, to the
Committee of Ministers and to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe for publication. This report shall be confined to a brief statement of the
facts and of the solution reached.

ABOVE PROOF THAT OUR SERVANTS AGREED & ARE PARTY TO SUPPRESSION OF THE FACTS relative to the 'organised
frauds on the taxpayers' care also of the many stooges and lovers of the system such as 'the fraudsters club recruits we point to in this
Access also the proof we page' and the persons named in the list at the bottom of most pages at this web-site. READERS, RESEARCHERS and sucker-victims
publish relevant to the fact (accosted and being used by fraudsters-club-recruits / encouraged to go for the carrot at the end of the line like asses) consider the cost
that politicians in allegedly to the generations to come..... to be taxed FOR THE INTEREST & CAPITAL REPAYMENT OF SUCH ARROGANT CONCEPTS &
civilised states agreed to CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE ANNUAL BUDGETS dear reader
suppress the criminal in
intent abuse of the legal
system and the courts
FOR RAMPANT FRAUD
ON THE SERFS & THE
TAXPAYERS IN
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (10 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
GENERAL, as we point to
BELOW EVIDENCE RELEASED BY THE GOVERNMENT after we reported the fraudster and lover of the system as is, Mrs
in this exclusive page,
while the media barons Veronica Beryl Foden, for her blunt parts in the constructive frauds through the courts AND HER EVIL ABUSE OF OUR
and the INTELLECTUAL TIME while promoting false undertakings and alleged intentions TO EXPOSE THE OFFENDERS SHE WAS WORKING WITH for
PROSTITUTES THEY the implementation of the 'intended and worked-for' rewards for MORONS OF HER MENTALITY TO MR & MRS AVERAGE, the
RETAIN AND MAINTAIN taxpayers.
CARRY ON ACTING AS
BLIND DEAF AND
MONKEYS AS THE
TAXES for mistakes & errors, BUT TAXES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS?
ABUSERS OF PUBLIC
OFFICE INDULGE. Do read this entire page and consider the arrangements by the controllers / creators of such facilities.
Consider then the £12.3 billion covered in the article on the left. Press releases to soften the blow OR to
We point above to a press prepare the citizens for the skeletons in the family closet? Read the article and then read the explicit
release by the
government. A front page
affidavit we publish in this page. It was called for because of abuse of the courts' facilities in the promotion
article published in 'The of Housing Benefit thefts & conversions.
Independent' some READ and consider the scenarios we cover in this page. Access the explicit page covering the fact that
months AFTER we
£12.3 billion in one
an alleged victim, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden, who was introduced to *human-rights* had been involved in
reported, to the year, including the type
many a theatrical production. The person was simply promoting, through crocodile tears, her devastation
government our of rewards to stooges &
observations in respect of
at the hands of the legal circles. However, through many a default and omission the alleged victim was
charlatans we point to
the part of yet 'another seen to be party to the scams until, eventually, her true colours shone through. We simply reported the
and expose in this and
LIPS fraudster. She scam to the Treasury and we have since begun to publish the evidence that establishes her parts in the
other pages.
consciously engaged in constructive frauds we cover in this and other pages. (*F2)
the DOUBLE FRAUD
exclusively EXPOSED by Institutionalised & Organised FRAUDS, as recognised 34 years earlier [*Link to FORGERY in High Court case]
us in this page (*Link to
the proof). Through the
courts, constructive The article on the left relates to Organised FRAUDS
Frauds on 'the budget', on
'the serfs', on 'the
taxpayers'. She had given
through the institutions created and maintained by the
us more than enough
grounds to raise the alarm European Union. [*Link to EU Law on Fraud]
and to REPORT THE
CRIMES AS INTENDED
BY HER AND THOSE
Even the person who was appointed to investigate
SHE WAS WORKING
WITH. Defaults aplenty the criminal activities was pressured to keep it all
and PREMEDITATED
ACTIVITIES. under wraps and then transferred to another project. [*Link
to the element of blackmail, that victims of the abused court facilities are subjected to; also to convert-lovers of the rampant
fraud who accost & USE other victims, and keep the taxpayers in the dark]

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (11 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
BELOW THE HEADLINES
COVER WRONGDOING AND
TAXES FOR COMPENSATION
ARISING OUT OF
UNACCEPTABLE PRACTICES
BY PERSONS IN PUBLIC
OFFICE, THE POLICE.
WE EXPECT OF THE
PERSONS WHO CONSIDER
IT THEIR DUTY TO
PUBLICISE HOW TAXES ARE
USED FOR COMPENSATION
TO THE VICTIMS, TO
SIMILARLY INFORM THE
TAXPAYERS OF THE FACTS
AND REALITIES WE PUBLISH
IN THIS EXCLUSIVE PAGE.
THE TEXT OF THE ARTICLE
WAS OCR'd THIS IMAGE
ALSO IN THE PAGE YOUR-
TAX WITH THE OCR'd
ARTICLE FOR LINKS TO ^
FROM OTHER PAGES AND
WEB-SITES, WHERE THE
PRACTICES OF AND BY
PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE
REPORTED / EXPOSED.
(*Link to new page)
KEY to Page & Site - List
LOCAL COUNCIL FRAUDS
Page CHANGES - List
RIGHTS In Legal Terms
FRAUD : Definitions
CRIME PAYS - confirmed
FRAUDSTERS CLUB - List
Public Agents To ACCOUNT
The ISSUES - Introduction.
LETTERS TO - Link to List
LETTERS FROM - Link to List
Other SITES EXPOSING - List
1. This Page
2. Site-Pages Intro. - List
3. Other Sites- Introducing
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (12 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
The above realities, were reported by the media consequential to our reports to The Treasury, to The
Home Office & to The Prime Minister. The reports and submissions were called for after a typical
fraudsters club recruit was caught at it and exposed as a participating play-mate in the constructive
frauds on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts facilities. [*Link to the page where we published our explicit
submissions to government, *Link to the page where we published evidence of PERJURY BY A SOLICITOR which the alleged victim of the constructive
frauds through the courts shoved in the dark corners of her corrupted mind. *Link to the page where we published evidence when an abuser of judicial
chair occupation arrogantly asserted (indirectly) WE (the legal circles) have finished with you, in the United Kingdom, just get on with it and seek your
reward from the European Court of Human Rights..... hence THE EVIL PERSON'S FAILURES TO MAKE PUBLIC THE FACTS OF LIFE and the
activities she was party to and a willing playmate in & for]
The development of and FOR THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, in modern times begun with the Magna
Carta, in England. Below, in as simple as can be defined, the principles of rights freedoms and
obligations, as clarified by Mark Janis, (fellow) Richard Kay (professor) and Anthony Bradley (professor).
● 1. Men are born and remain free and equal in rights; social distinctions may be based only upon general usefulness.
● 2. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and inalienable rights of man; these rights are liberty, property,
security, and resistance to oppression.
● 3. The source of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation; no group, no individual may exercise authority not emanating expressly
therefrom.
● 4. Liberty consists of the power to do whatever is not injurious to others; thus the enjoyment of the natural rights of every man has for its limits
only those that assure other members of society the enjoyment of those same rights; such limits may be determined only by law.
● 5. The law has the right to forbid only actions which are injurious to society. Whatever is not forbidden by law, may not be prevented, and no one
may be constrained to do what it does not prescribe.
● 6. Law is the expression of the general will; all citizens have the right to concur personally, or through their representatives, in its formation; it
must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal before it, are equally admissible to all public offices, positions,
and employment, according to their capacity, and without other distinction than that of virtues and talents.
● 7. No man may be accused, arrested, or detained except in the cases determined by law, and according to the forms prescribed thereby.
Whoever solicits, expedites, or executes arbitrary orders, or has them executed, must be punished; but every citizen summoned or apprehended
in pursuance of the law must obey immediately; he renders himself culpable by resistance.
● 8. The law is to establish only penalties that are absolutely and obviously necessary; and no one may be punished except by virtue of a law
established and promulgated prior to the offence and legally applied.
● 9. Since every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty, if arrest be deemed indispensable, all unnecessary severity for securing the
person of the accused must be severely repressed by law.
● 10. No one is to be disquieted because of his opinions, even religious, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established
by law.
● 11. Free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Consequently, every citizen may speak, write,
and print freely, subject to responsibility for the abuse of such liberty in the eases determined by law.
● 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and citizen necessitates a public force; such a force, therefore, is instituted for the advantage of all and
not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.
● 13. For the maintenance of the public force and for the expenses of administration a common tax is indispensable; it must be assessed equally
on all citizens in proportion to their means.
● 14. Citizens have the right to ascertain, by themselves or through their representatives, the necessity of the public tax, to consent to it freely, to
supervise its use, and to determine its quota, assessment, payment, and duration.
● 15. Society has the right to require of every public agent an accounting of his administration.
● 16. Every society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured or the separation of powers not determined has no constitution at all.
● 17. Since property is a sacred and inviolable right, no one may be deprived thereof unless a legally established public necessity obviously
requires it, and upon condition of a just and previous indemnity.
Consider the above in the context of our founder's proclamation on true Democracy and do not fail to note, above, the obvious: Society,
Confidential Fraud
4. Quotes - A-Z Index CITIZENS HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE OF EVERY PUBLIC AGENT AN ACCOUNTING OF HIS / HER
5. No Waffle - No Falsehoods
6. Personalities - Quotes ADMINISTRATION. The *human-rights* DECLARATION challenge, was born of the above principles and the most fundamental
7. Press Media - Hypocrites principle of and for unadulterated 'Justice', the principle of "JUSTICE TO BE SEEN TO BE DONE"as clarified by the European
8. Institutionalised FRAUD Court of Human Rights.
9. Local Authorities Fraud
10. 12.3 Billion Compensation NOTE:
& An Affidavit Years Ahead
11. Public Servants Instigate
Fraud - Rampant Corruption ● The affidavit below was settled and lodged at court when CHALLENGING the rampant free for all (*1) in the thefts, the
12. Relying On Local Courts misappropriation and the organised constructive frauds instigated by the staff and officers of Local Authorities (*2). Visitors,
13. BENEFIT FREE FOR ALL
readers and researchers should note that the staff and officers at the local county court simply indulged as promoters and
14. Police & False Information
accessories of the criminal activities (*3). Obstructing 'Justice' and denying / violating the rights (*4) of targeted citizens, the
Compensation Industry
main thrust of the 'enterprising' (*5). And the police (*6), beneficiaries in the Housing Benefit Scams, also breaching their public
List duties and acting in contempt of the law, through blunt defaults and omissions (*7).
WHY INDUSTRY - Reasons
1. EU Public Sector FRAUD
● The affidavit (as published below) was sent to certain 'victims' whose activities and defaults indicated they were only interested in
2. TAXES for Compensation joining the fraudsters club (*1), as opposed to 'reporting and exposing apropos' (*2) the criminals who were and are in control
3. Lawyers Appalling Service of the Law Enforcement Agencies that successive governments have maintained in the United Kingdom, at the expense of the
4. Page link to MEDIA Page citizens (*3).
5. AWARDS to INSIDERS
<>
● Promoting and ignoring the arrogance (*1) of the police who fail to prosecute criminals, as we cover in our pages, was and
remains the central and pivotal argument and script 'the new recruits' of 'the fraudsters club' relentlessly recite. All produce,
Page CHANGES - List interestingly, unchallenged communications which 'instruments' only a few follow up (*2) through and at the offending beehives
Added articles - scans
EU Public Sector FRAUD
(*3).
TAXES for Compensation ● Contempt for the law and all evidence (*1), for the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises is but the cornerstone of the society the
Lawyers Appalling Service corrupt and corrupters have been creating for centuries.
Page link to MEDIA Page
● The clearly pleaded BILLIONS by way of compensation under the counter, as provided for and clarified above, should cause
<>
the maligned hypocrites and sycophants to land on terra firma. Their main pre-occupation had been and was to obstruct the
The Issues truth from being told and the realities from being exposed to the world. Their only aim: "To join the fraudsters' club and 'To
Compensation Industry - List use the system of operations', as we cover in our explicit 'two LIPS talking' page, for personal gain, through fraud endorsed and
1. Fraud - Affidavit & PROOF
acquiesced.
2. Criminals Interfere in N/G
3. The Real Shysters. ● Consider that since we reported to the TREASURY the blunt arrogance and rampant fraudulent activities as entered into by
4. Hypocrisy - Sycophancy the legal circles in January 2002, and thereafter much has been released to the press by way of 'activities and propositions as
5. Complain, Yet Do Nothing well as acknowledgement of 'white collar fraud'. Activities as entertained by 'public servants' who purportedly are 'serving
6. Enticing Others In Deceit
justice' are nothing but constructive frauds on the budget - TAX PAYERS as we cover in this file/page. Access the report (*1)
7. Relish In Evil-Mongering
8. Many A Foul Word
and the words we link you to (*2). Then recognise why the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng was moved to the Treasury after our succinct
9. Article 38 Provision submissions there and to the Prime Minister following the events covered in the exclusive page/file we link you to (*3).
10. Defaults & Omissions
11. Offenders Ignore Law
12. Police/Judges Ignore Law GENERAL FORM OF AFFIDAVIT Sworn by: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
13. Stephen Lawrence.
14. Name Calling Advocates
PLAINTIFF Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This is the FIRST Affidavit filed on behalf of THE
15. The Real Silent Shysters
DEFENDANTS by the Deponent on.................
16. Lawyers Milking System
17. Money Under The Table Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18. Billions in compensation In the Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
19. Fraud For Compensation
DEFENDANTS: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Case No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (13 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
Page Quotes
1. Torment And Torture
2. Publish In Public Interest
3. Perpetuation of Fraud
4. Corrupted Legal System I Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, of XXxxxxxxxx XXXX in the Xxxxxxxx Borough of Xxxxxxx, legal author and lecturer of law
5. The Foundation Stone
MAKE OATH and say as follows:-
6. The Fraudsters Club
7. Crucial Word:'Confidential'
8. Must Not Disclose This 1. I was born in Xxxxxxxx in the village of Xxxxxxxxx in the district of Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on XX Xxxx 1936 and have resided in
9. Your Servants Indulge the United Kingdom as and of 5/11/1979 and as a citizen of the United Kingdom as of 19/7/1997.
10. Stingray Operators
11.Accuse Mr&Mrs Average
12. Exercise Your Rights 2. In my early years I served as a shepherd (looking after the family herd) followed by studies at a hieratical seminary; and
13. Expose The Offenders following military studies I served as a commissioned officer in the Xxxxxxxxx National Army.
14. Parliament Provided 4U
15. Citizen Is Duty Bound
3. As of 1960 I have been a practising lawyer and have been serving as a reporter; I have published books and works on legal
16. All Care Of Those Who
17. Blow Their Trumpets matters, dissertations, treatises, reports, and have submitted opinions on legal matters.
18. Disgust At Practices
19. Partners In Deception 4. I served with the United Nations Organisation (1979) the European Common Market, at the European Council, as the attorney-
20. 'Crime Pays' (say police)
at-law of the "Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of the United Nations", a Non Governmental Organisation the legal
21. The REAL SHYSTERS
..
status and persona of which has been recognised by the European Commission (Strasbourg) as of XXxx Xxxxxx 1986.

Definitions 5. As of Xxx Xxxxx 1984 I am the President and legal adviser of the aforementioned N.G.O and as of XXxx Xxxxxxx 1995 I am a
1. deceit & deception member of the Union of Lawyers of London (membership number XXXX).
2. duplicity
3. impostor
4. pretender 6. Following written submissions by The CAMILA Project on Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx 1997 and on XXxx Xxxxxxxxxx 1997, the
5. racket administrative council of the XXXXXXXX (N.G.O - paragraph 4 above) through its directive 1-126 instructed me to submit legal
6. sham
opinion in the matter of an Order/determination by District Judge Xxxxxxx sitting in private in the case XXXXXXXXXX on XXxx
deceit / deception Xxxxxxxxx 1997 issued on the day while neither party to the action was present and or took part in the proceedings; I submit
deception ? Could any hereto below my opinions and findings.
citizen, who benefited
from a very positive first
7. Upon reference to International Treaties and Conventions, case-law, precedent cases on International Justice, etc. I determined
meeting with any solicitor
and then arranged for the that the above stated decision/ruling/Order of District Judge Xxxxx is null and void, unenforceable, false and or a forgery,
transfer of his/her papers unprecedented, and a by-product of "XXXXXXX" practices within the Judicial Services/System maintained by the United Kingdom
from another member of and that it constitutes an insult in the annals of Justice, to the integrity of Justice, the intelligence of the citizens and that it makes
the Law Society, another mockery of the United Kingdom Parliament, the European Parliament, the European Union and the Council of Europe all of which
solicitor who failed legislated and ratified Treaties and International Agreements, and because:-
him/her, and then found
himself /herself in the
same stranglehold, (1) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" that was ratified by the
consider how he/she was United Kingdom at the United Nations in 1966, (New York).
caused to transfer to the
new solicitor as nothing
(2) It contravenes and breaches articles X-XX of the Universal Declaration of the United Nations which were adopted on
else but the results of
deception ? One only has 10/12/1948 by the U.N.O following the establishment of the United Nations on 26th June 1945 in San Francisco.
to consider the tribulations
of the divorce victim's (3) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Treaty of Rome as was entered into on 25th March 1957 by the
case as stated in the participating nations of the European Economic Community, and subsequently were endorsed by the United Kingdom.
appeal published in our
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (14 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
HomePages at:
(4) It contravenes and or breaches articles X-XXX of the Mastrich Treaty as was adopted on 7 February 1992 and amended on 16
/corruptcourts.htm
July 1997 and has been in force as of 1 November 1993.
'duplicity' 2purposes?
Can any citizen whose (5) The Order specifically contravenes and violates articles X-XX of the European Convention of the Council of Europe that was
legal representatives adopted in Rome on 4 November 1950.
(acting as agents in court
proceedings through their (6) The aforementioned Universal / International Declarations, Conventions and Treaties have been endorsed, adopted and or
subcontracted and
ratified by the United Kingdom (as of 10/12/1948,14/1/1966, etc.) and prevail over all conflicting and or contravening United
appointed by the agents,
barristers, who then act as Kingdom Statutory Act, Law and or any Order arising out of the United Kingdom Constitution of 1764 (or of any other individual
agents for the agents at member of the U.N.O) such as article 103 of the U.N.O Charter (26/6/1945) article XXX, paragraph X of the European Economic
court) indulging in private Community and articles X, XX, XX, XX, XX of the above Treaty, X (X), specifically provide.
and undisclosed blunt
arrangements with the
(7) As of 14/1/1966 to-date the United Kingdom has been caused by the European Commission on Human Rights to accept that
opposition's agents, be
anything else ? Especially some 1200 violations lodged with the Commission were well founded and accepted by the United Kingdom without reference to
when both sides, in any the Court itself and or were determined by the Court of the Commission to have been proven; and the (uninformed) citizens of the
dispute, are securing United Kingdom, en masse, as revenue providers have had to make good damages and or to compensate the victims of British
'pecuniary advantage over Judges in the sum of some f 4,500.000,000 because of similar practices and or orders such as the one appealed against by the
their respective clients Defendants in the action XXXXXXXXX which was referred to me, which Order in any event,
through and with the
blessings of judicial chair
occupants as covered in (8) Is null and void because it was entered into in the absence of both parties; and because District Judge Xxxxx through silence
the material facts and with endorses the Claim yet seeks to suppress the Counterclaim thereby provoking the Defendants and Justice itself; also because on
the documented evidence the one hand the Judge declares neither party was in attendance yet on the other asserts that the matter before the court was an
being published at: ex parte application, as if one party was present. (as a test to students of court practice ?).
law.society.complaints

(9) and furthermore, even if the Counterclaim was deemed vague and or was rejected on grounds that Court Fees were not
pretender' pretender ?
remitted, on its own the Order is null and void because the Judge failed to state the grounds upon which he quietly endorsed the
Could any citizen who has
been accosted / Claim yet rejected the Counterclaim in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992.
approached by alleged
victims of the system, (10) and finally the proceedings were null and void because the Defendants were not Summonsed before the Court; presumably
seeking help and or forged proof of service was used (a criminal offence).
offering assistance,
subsequently seen to
have been acting exactly (11) District Judge Xxxxx specifically violated section X(X) of "The European Communities Act 1972" which specifically provides
as those the alleged that all of the aforementioned Treaties, Conventions and International accords as under paragraphs X(X) through to X(X) above
victims complained about, specifically provide that the provisions referred to above and herein supersede and override all National Law and that Judges must
and fail to do their duty, to discipline themselves and uphold the provisions of all Law and accords which successive United Kingdom Governments endorsed
report to the authorities
and ratified on behalf of the citizens whose rights the Judges are meant to protect against all, irrespective of position and without
the crimes they were/are
victims of with the discrimination.
documented proof the
victims brandish about to (12) District Judge Xxxxx ought to have been dismissed as of 1993 after 10 Summonses were issued by the XXXXXXX (N.G.O,
persons they wish to paragraph 4 above) and especially after the police were called to arrest him because he refused to remove himself from the bench
impress, while promoting
(on substantive grounds, such as he was implicated in a matter over which he could not possibly preside and or act as an
letters from the police (to
others) and or from their independent and impartial person) namely in the case XXXXXXXXX following an invitation by my person for him to resign and
own MP's that indicate 'the remove himself from the bench.
criminal activities are
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (15 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
condoned by one and all', (13) District Judge Xxxxxx has been reported as a 'fascist', an agent provocateur of the Xxxxxxxxxxx and a complex and or hang-
including 'the victims' who
up person who relies on another XX High Court Judges, reported Xxxxxxxxxxx (refer to 'The Independent' newspaper of
then fail to use their rights
to join with others to XX/XX/XXXX) who act as such and not as true and unbiased Judicious persons while purportedly serving as such in a Judicial
expose, on the Internet, capacity in the United Kingdom.
the rampant fraud and
corruption, be anything (14) The Defence, Counterclaim and in particular the Appeal submitted to the Court by the Defendants which has as yet to be set
else, especially when 'the
down by the staff of the Court (the public servants who systematically and habitually serve other purposes than their duties to the
victims' are seen to have
joined the club as covered public at large) must be accepted and set down by the Court in consideration of the amount claimed under the Counterclaim
in this page? Access the without objections and or on any grounds even if the Court failed to invite the Defendants to meet and or submit additional Court
explicit page /2lipstalk.htm Fees following the submission of the Defence and Counterclaim pleadings to the Court, even if any additional Court Fees were/are
where more than enough deemed payable because the Counterclaim is higher than the claim, which the Court ought to and must invite the Defendants to
evidence will be published remit such Court Fees if deemed essential under the new rules of the Court which its clerical staff ought to have invited the
about persons who made Defendants to remit in the first instance.
contact with us only to
behave as deceitfully and
with plenty of duplicity Sworn at ..................................................... by...Xx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
of/in purpose as the
exchanges between the
'two victim challengers
in the county of ........................................ of ...Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx
aspiring to and or making
a career out of the this .......... day of .........................1997 ........Xxxxxx XXX XXX
discoveries they made
while in the nets of the
licensed fraudsters'.
Before me .........…...................................... Officer of the Court appointed by the Judge to take affidavits
COPIES OF THE ABOVE affidavit were transmitted by FAX to (a) Mr Norman Scarth, (b) Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins (c) Mr Maurice
'racket' Could be the only Kellett. Others, who were 'noted to be lovers of the system as is', were handed copies or were pointed to the presence of the above
word the citizens can use
affidavit in the public domain (this web-site) at various times. The last two known to be the most vociferous of Freemason bashers &
to describe the activities of
the staff and officers of the activists in spreading the gospel in respect of the powers that be. All three were & are benefiting from 'attraction' to their
Solicitors' Complaint promotional capabilities and known to be lovers of the system as is CARE OF THE FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR FRAUD
Bureau and complain to APLENTY and the corruption of morons who fall victim to the practices in the courts, also to their own short-sightedness when
its successor, the Office ignoring their obligations to the rest of society and the taxpayers in general. We point to the simple fact that anyone conceding to &
for the Supervision of accepting the invitation to keep quiet (hence the failures of one and all from within many an alleged group of challenging activists,
Solicitors (both of which
such as the LIPS crowd/mob, the UKMM, the fnf, the ELC, the f4J, etc.) who nonetheless default / fail to publish in the public domain
were/are maintained by
the Law Society and its the facts of life IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM / THE COURTS). Such persons recklessly ignore the fact that they render themselves to
members. Both run and be accessories and abettors to ACTS OF CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS. The first two, named above, were also
managed by 'solicitors'). known to be active in USING OTHER VICTIMS FOR MORE OF THE SAME : FOR THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE FOR
Could there be another KEEPING QUIET, for suppressing the true facts of life (in tandem with the media) in the legal system and the fraudulent use of the
more apt word ? Let us courts' facilities, as covered in this page and acknowledged by two politicians from a legal background. [*Link from here to evidence,
have your own opinions
above, relevant to suppression of criminal activities]
and submissions besides
our definition that has long
been accepted and
endorsed by the majority
of their victims: 'The
pinnacle of the money
laundering enterprises,
run by the scavenging
parasites'.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (16 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud

*sham* (link) sham?

Could any report and or
purported attendance to
the issues referred to the
Law Society that then
refers the citizens to the
OSS the officers of which
then assert 'having looked
into (!) the matters raised'
without any reference to
the evidence submitted to
the blind and deaf, at all
material times, be
anything but a sham ?
Access the material at:
/shame.htm where
material will be published
covering exchanges with
the blind and deaf third
rate actors the law society
and its members rely upon
to build their world.

THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB

fraud= impostor (noun), deceit, swindle, racket, sham, deception, duplicity, pretender, misrepresentation.... [*Link from here to a page where we point to the
issue of 'recoverable proceeds of fraud' as determined by judiciary over the years when the judges served the law and the citizens an no other interests]

OVER the years we have been contacted by a number of shysters and fraudsters who fell / fall within the above category. As of 1997/8, in particular,
a number have used contact with us simply to bring about pressures on the offenders, the abusers of trust, the abusers of public office and the abusers of the
courts' facilities. They promoted, to us, 'assertions of intent to publish it all, facts and evidence, on the Internet. They were simply using the 'threat to
publish it all, as the avenue through which to bring about settlement of their cases under the facility / provisions we expose and point to above. *Link from
here to evidence establishing the fact that such a shyster, one Johan Michael Richard Foenander, had entered into negotiations with 'the
authorities' for a settlement / reward under the table as covered in this page, before Mr Peter Hayward the organiser of the LIPS crowd / mob
directed him to contact Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The letter from a solicitor who, to all intents and purposes was acting for Mr Foenander at the time, had
written to another solicitor in order to turn down an offer from the other solicitor BECAUSE HIS CLIENT'S CASE WAS NEARING COMPLETION at the
European Court of Human Rights : In other words the taxpayers' contributions -to the national budget- were to be used to reward his client for playing the
field, as an accomplished (sucked-in) fraudsters-club-recruit. The principles of law violated through such 'provisions' are very clear. Only persons who lack
any knowledge of law cannot see through the crystal clear implications as to the tax revenue targeted, stolen & misappropriated, because of blunt abuse of
the legal system and the courts' facilities'. We point all abusers of our time and goodwill, to the House of Lords Precedent case we released particulars of on
3rd March 2008. [*Link from here to the deliberations by their Lordships -as long ago as 1939-1940- when they covered issues of recklessness by solicitors and unsupervised
juniors; in the instance at all manner of deficient pleadings -such as a defence suspected to be false- and erratic submissions to the court were part of 'the constructive frauds on 'the
serfs' who were represented by persons, licensed by the Law Society, to operate collectively as *The Cancerous Growth Industry* that Mr Andrew Yiannides first wrote of in 1970-72.

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (17 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud

Consider the facts published and to be published in these pages. Simply consider the evidence published and to be published as part of the *2lipstalk* page. You can then draw your
own conclusions as to the only possible scenarios the evidence supports. Undisclosed secret arrangements by self-appointed 'gurus' in legal matters and court procedure, nonetheless
end up lodging applications to the Strasbourg, after failing to challenge the abductors of Justice appropriately. We publish in this page a letter that Andrew settled for two victims of
abuse of office. The abusers, none other but the police. The prosecution urged by the police to proceed against the targeted victims even though the Crown Prosecution Service told
the police there was insufficient evidence for convictions on the issues the police were urging for a prosecution. The police and the CPS failed to make a case against the targeted
citizens who then instituted proceedings against the police for damages. The damages claimed attached to the manner with which the police brought about the prosecution and arising
out of the failed prosecution itself. To proceed with their case the victims of abuse of public office were obstructed with their rights at and in law. The letter below clarifies in a nutshell
HOW public servants, who are retained on our behalf to serve the law and Justice engage in the usual tactics and practices for the promotion of the self perpetuating cancerous growth
industry. Read the letter and recognise how the law is breached and how rights at and in law ARE violated by the servants of law and justice. Nothing could be simpler.

Such persons running around asserting and alleging that their cases were not addressed by the European Court. That we are familiar with the provision we draw your attention to
through these page, we simply state:- "Care of Article 38, all is suppressed; and the victims who, allegedly were let down by the courts in the United kingdom and the European Court
on Human Rights, 'appear to be happy to let things be'! The very same persons brandish about letters from Members of Parliament and the police authorities. They even BLAME THE
MEDIA for being wets and or for their downright indifference to 'their personal catastrophes'.

The vast majority of victims simply lodge complaints founded and resting on 'unfair hearings'. In fact much more than that single element can be claimed. The two typical examples we
cover in the Appeals published in our pages support most that we publish in this page:-

1. In the matter of the rampant Housing Benefit FRAUD through DOWNRIGHT THEFT and MISAPPROPRIATION of the housing benefit funds did not end as the offenders had set
out to do. The crimes indulged into with the blessings of the police, who systematically fail to prosecute those who create, procure and promote FORGERIES for such crimes, did not
culminate as the offenders set out to do. The crimes endorsed, acquiesced and promoted by the staff and officers of the 'relevant courts' (who issue and serve court orders without
hearings, and even post them late, to persons who were/are party to the organised / institutionalised crime') did pay attention to the submissions filed at court and as delivered to the
Lord Chancellor. Letters and documents to the Law Enforcement Agencies will now be published as we have secured more than enough evidence as to who responsible. Some of the
principles were covered in the letter already published. We refer you to the content of the letter of 18 December 1998 to the Home Secretary. Consider the speed in which action was
taken by the government, the councillor that ignored us for over four months and the local press that were ignoring it all for almost four years. We are to publish now an explicit letter to
the Lord Chancellor covering another case. The letter covers earlier attempts, when reliance was placed on the same persons who were/are operating from within the same county
court but seen to be offering their assistance and illicit services to another Local Authority. That case is partly covered in the affidavit published in *thefacts.htm* page.

2. The divorce proceedings victim, was the person who instigated the undisclosed, to Andrew, telephone exchanges. The content, published in the *2lipstalk.htm* file evinces the
frame of mind in which the caller approached the person he called. In the meantime the operators of the Housing Benefit constructive frauds industry, after exposures we published in
our pages, after gearing up for the conversion of one targeted property, and following APPROPRIATE CHALLENGES we shall be publishing, the owners were permitted to exercise
their rights to sell the property.
Two images below of a letter delivered in May 1999 to the Head of Exchequer at Haringey Council, North London. Attached to it THE LAW applicable to the issues the Council's
OFFICERS had been aware of while they all carried on IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW, naturally because of their reliance on the most offensive of facilities FOR the rampant fraud from
within all public services. Below the two images an introduction to the 'The Daily Telegraph' main article that covered the very issue two years later. It came about after we reported the
constructive frauds, through the courts to the government, as covered in our pages. (*Link to the page where we publish copies of faxes to the government)

EXPLICITletter to Haringey Council, staff & officers of which, were noted to have been acting
in contempt of the law. All simply were relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation and the
police to negate in the execution of their public duties and to similarly indulge in contempt of
Parliament's laws. Protection of the citizens as Parliament's law and International treaties
assure all, were simply relegated to the trash cans in the Republic of Haringey, as in many a
state where pseudodemocracy is promoted as the if the genuine article.
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (18 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
Page1 Page2 For further information on the activities of the staff of Haringey Council (as in other councils) readers & researchers should
access the following pages: 1. natinscan 2. haringey 3. hbappeal. 4. benfraud 5. scamlocal 6. theyknow 7. free4all 8. thefacts 9. abuse
For further information on criminal in intent activities, routine defaults and arrogantly reckless contempt for the law by the
police (as a body corporate) retained and maintained by the Republic of Haringey, readers, researchers and concerned citizens
should access the following pages: 1. crimesin 2. forgeries 3.
Additional material inclusive of court proceedings (attempts to abuse the courts facilities) for and in connection with fraudulent
demands, harassment and intimidation, visitors, readers and researchers should access also the page:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Council/Enfield/workand.htm

THERE read the letters to the Minister & to Local Authority staff / officers who were operating out of Haringey Council, also
Hackney Council and, as the affidavit published in this page (*Link) establishes, as other alleged 'servants of the public' similarly indulged out
of Enfield Council.

FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link
to the article we reproduce for obvious reasons]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. Accessing the material
pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in
2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when
we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury,
(c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the
ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides].
Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal)
also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold
souls always do [*Link to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the
LIPS crowd / mob].
1. FOUR COMPARATIVE CASES, proof of ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES & the fraudulently misrepresented *independence of the
judiciary* who are free to indulge as they determine to suit pre-arranged plans for 'the serfs' who pay taxes for the salaries of licensed by the state 'criminals'. The authorities and the
media, between them, have ensured in an alleged democracy, one that ALLEGEDLY rests and is founded on law and order, that for ALMOST SIX DECADES NOW the citizens, THE
'SERFS' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK. Read about secret meetings (*Link) where self appointed gurus, in the use and distribution of resources, INCLUDE 'THE SERFS' WORK AND
WEALTH CREATING CAPABILITIES IN THEIR CONVERSION OF ASSETS PLANS. CONVERTING IT ALL TO THEMSELVES & THEIR PARTNERS IN CRIME AS THEY GO
ALONG, care of the fourth quote (*Link) in our HomePage, is their main pre-occupation.
(Case ONE) The realistic conclusion you read of in our HomePage, over TEN YEARS BEFORE THE SEQUESTRATION of the assets of the National Union of Mineworkers through
the official services and instruments at the disposal of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys (do look up the word 'jockey' in a decent Dictionary of the English language). Free to indulge
as they please (or as appointed / directed / retained for) judicial chair occupants (*Link to definition) act as administrators of everybody's rights to their properties, INCLUDING
RIGHTS IN AND AT LAW.
(Case TWO) The very same administrators ('public servants' (?)) could not use the same facilities to recover the STOLEN (criminal offence) FUNDS from the MIRROR GROUP
PENSION FUND (!).
(Case THREE) The very same 'public servants' (?) could not use the same facilities to trace and recover the BILLIONS IMPORTED & MISAPPROPRIATED (distributed) through the
POLY PECK plc FINANCIAL FIASCO. Obviously, WHEN TARGETING ASSETS anything and everything is possible; everybody knows 'the ropes to use'; but WHEN CRIME, by the
institutions is at the root of it all, NOTHING EXISTS TO BRING ABOUT SIMILAR SUCCESSES. Precisely the same rules apply WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSETS THAT ARE
TARGETED FOR CONVERSION OF THE 'SERFS' / 'SHITIZENS' PERSONAL ASSETS TO THE SELF-APPOINTED 'LORDS AND MASTERS' in charge of CIUKU Enterprises [*Link
from here to definition]. As controllers of it all, through abuse of the legal system and the courts' facilities, they act as they please. WE URGE YOU TO READ THE WORDS
STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH, as reproduced in our pages [*Link from here to the page) and consider the role of the media in the cases we point to and briefly cover in
this footnote.
(c) Read also of the foundations and the corner stone upon which they, the criminals in control, have been building the societies of their own making for centuries / millennia. They are
only acting in accordance with the teachings they follow [*Link from here], as taught by their 'God' and through the scheme and arrangements we cover AND EXPOSE IN THIS PAGE.
Many the converts to their world of evil-mongering via dishonesty, deceptions and fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty.
(Case FOUR) We add, the creme de la creme, to the above. It was alleged and promoted by one and all (the media in the forefront) that as the front-man and controller of operations
file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (19 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]
Confidential Fraud
(in the Poly Peck plc. fiasco) 'conveniently escaped to the unrecognised haven of the occupied Northern part of Cyprus', there was nothing the masters of ceremonies (on the world
stage) could do. BUT, when the authorities in the United Kingdom were caused (by the brother/sister/family of murder victim Michael Menson) to INVESTIGATE & ACT PROPERLY in
that instance, somehow they were able and succeeded in securing the co-operation of the unrecognised (?) stage managers in the occupied Northern part of Cyprus. SPEAK OF
SPLIT PERSONALITIES & ORGANISED MASTER-CRAFTSMEN IN THE ART OF DECEPTION & FRAUD on the world stage! Between them, the first and second place holders for
violations of human rights in Europe, they sure made a mess of things for any thinker to note.
2. From here *Link to a page where we expose Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden's parts and REAL OBJECTIVES (note plural) when she suppressed & did nothing about the Perjury by a
solicitor she was working with for far too long. All the while, she was of opinion that by abusing the time and patience of Mr Andrew Yiannides (as the typical fraud of a 'human' that
she was) she could carry on proclaiming her assertions about the criminal activities in and through the courts imposed on the serfs', care of her type of subliminal indoctrination inputs
to the ploys created & used by the organisers of it all. HER CONVENIENT DEFAULTS & HER MOST DIRECT OF INVOLVEMENT and CREATION (by her) of the very activities she
was engaging in, simply exposed her parts as just another stooge who was sent along (by the LIPS crowd mob and fraudsters) to engage in abuse of the trust she was gracefully
afforded by Mr Andrew Yiannides. IN FACT HER PARTS WERE NOTED FROM THE ONSET, specifically when she indulged in the applications SHE ALONE INSTIGATED which
one and all (of her associates & their affiliates) were of opinion could have been used to discredit Mr Andrew Yiannides. AS A FRAUDSTER WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE SCAMS &
THE ORGANISED THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS the dreamers wrongly presumed that hers / their aims care of and the parts and the convenient defaults she engaged in, could not
be recognised as blunt contributions (by her) for and towards the constructive frauds, leading to rewards for the participants through the abused courts facilities. All too obvious as of
the activities, the defaults and HER FAILURES TO RAISE ANY ISSUE after the solicitor submitted the PERJURED AFFIDAVIT to court; the objective of one and all simply to
generate ADDITIONAL COSTS ORDERS AGAINST THE ALLEGED VICTIM, as p[art of the money laundering facilities for the stolen taxpayers contributions through the usual
fraudulent court proceedings = theatrics].
3. *Link from here to a page where we publish a letter sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides by such a person. The link takes one directly to the letter and the challenges made of the
dreamer who had been abusing the goodwill and patience for far too long; having stretched Andrew's tolerance to its limits over a span of well over 7 years. Abusing the time, testing
the patience & tolerance limits of the one whose stance and presence never failed the self-proclaimed 'hero' was in the order of the day, as the wily Norman Scarth indulged for years.
The 'hero' who (a) decided to join the club of fraudsters, (b) never to disclose his deceitful plans with others & his intentions to the person he looked to and relied upon for suport for
years and (c) had been working in tandem with others ONLY TOWARDS THE PLUNDERING OF THE TAXPAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATIONAL BUDGET was in the
order of the day as the craft-y product of the abused courts facilities carried on, had been and weas engaging with others in the creation and execution of the scenarios we cover,
point to and expos in this page. Readers, researchers and victims of the rampant fraud, through the courts imposed on the taxpeyers, are urged to read all of the letter we
point to; all should note the challenges & the submissions to the fraud of a human (thinker) and all should access other material and evidence pointed to in the page or
other pages. It is befals upon the WELL INFORMED to draw relevant conclusions and to consider the issue we point to in another page in consideration of an element and
promotions the Freemasons also promote in connection with their 'contributions' through history to the development of modern pseudodemocracies and other states of government for
the management & control of 'the serfs', the sons of men on planet earth. [*Link also from here to a page where we publish a transcript when the theatrical production for the day was
but a run of the usual constructive frauds on the taxpayers. NOTE HOW & WHY A DISTRICT JUDGE WAS CHALLENGED TO STAND DOWN. Note also the give-away signs that
exposed the true colours of the stars of the scenario / production in that instance. NOTE also the blunt discrimination by the DJ who DID NOT RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO A
POLITE REQUEST but simply wished to carry on WITH THE INTENDED END PRODUCT FOR THE DAY. Carrying on as pre-arranged / organised by the criminals in control with
the objectives for the day, was the only issue at hand as far as that District Judge was concerned; Justice had been dispensed with by the abusers of judicial chair occupants at the
Employment Tribunals].
4. Thinkers : 'humans who use grey matter' should consider "Why fail to refer to the Proceeds of Crime Act and implement Parliament's intentions, in the first instance,
especially since the rogue businessman, had been found guilty of the crime of FRAUD? Why did Lord Woolf fail to refer to such provisions by Parliament and worse WHY
DID THE REPORTER / EDITOR of the 'news-print / waffle' BESIDES IGNORING PARLIAMENT'S PROVISIONS, which we elect not to overlook? Also, what of the words of
Victims of the abused court facilities -by licensed criminals- MUST ACCESS and consider the 'duty of any judge, in any civilised state -Democratic or not society- as qualified &
clarified in the page all visitors, readers and researchers should link to from here, IF THEY CARE about the direction & paths, allegedly civilised states have been placed on by the
criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth.
5. Link from here to the most obvious of arrangements in place by the organisers xxx
6. xxx
7. xxx
8. xxx
9. xxx
10. xxx

Pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is
.org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/actors.htm .org.actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/courts.htm

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (20 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]

Confidential Fraud
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/govolso.htm .org/len.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
● ALL of the persons we expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = taxpayers ), THE ABUSERS OF
PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES.
● They all did so because of their love for the rampant fraud on the national budget (the uninformed taxpayers) as covered in the exclusive page, which page
ONE & ALL SIMPLY IGNORED.
● Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to
it all.
● Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman
Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm.
● The author's statements, such as 'what for and why he sought additional assistance', spell out his parts as a lover of it all.
● Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, all of whom engage in fraudulent misrepresentations
AND WILFULLY TO HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF
THE COURTS FACILITIES.
● All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author and his partners in fraud aplenty, simply
shoved in the dark corners of his/their perverted / corrupted mind(s).

ACCESS: http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site)

& http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org (A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' and 'no undue influence' by solicitor.)

To HomePage To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed

*Link from here to extracts from 'Dancing Alone', the work of Frank Schaeffer: - "The
Knowledge Class even audaciously proposes to solve the very
social pathologies they themselves often contributed to creating. They continue to demand that we give them more money, more time,
and even allow them to raise our taxes again and again to underwrite yet more utopian experiments in social engineering and state-
sponsored "virtue," in spite of the fact that the least productive people in our society are often those with whom our social engineers
and their government programs, have had the most to do........."

Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of
the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form
and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material
in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact: webmaster

file:///E|/WEBSHARE/WWWROOT/ukhumanrights/confraud.htm (21 of 21) [25/02/09 23:11:51]