Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects Of Hydrokinetic Turbines On Aquatic Life: TURBINE PASSAGE AND FISH BEAHVIOR
Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Aquatic Life Turbine Passage and Fish Behavior
What have we learned from conventional hydro?
Theoretical estimation of strike probability and mortality using established models adapted to hydrokinetic devices
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria CAVITATION
Formation of gas bubbles caused by reduction in pressure at or below vapor pressure. Gas bubbles collapse when they enter regions of higher pressure.
http://wayneandlayne.com/tag/hydraulics/
Pressure waves from the violent collapse of gas bubbles can injure fish. If water pressure does not drop below 60% of ambient pressure, cavitation will not occur. May be a potential source of injury/mortality to fish passing through hydrokinetic turbines (DOE 2009).
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria SHEAR
Shear stresses sufficient to injure fish may occur near turbine rotors/blades (Cada et al. 2007). Biocriteria for damaging levels of shear have been identified for conventional hydro turbines. These data are applicable to hydrokinetic turbines; information on shear levels (magnitude and extent) needs to be developed for each turbine design.
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria PRESSURE
Hydrokinetic turbines do not experience extensive and rapid changes in pressure which have been shown to damage fish during passage through conventional hydro turbines. If pressurerelated injury and mortality occur, they likely will be associated with cavitation areas.
Abernethy et al. (2001)
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria BLADE STRIKE
Primary mechanism of fish injury and mortality at many hydro projects. Strike probability depends on blade spacing, rotational speed, relative velocity of fish to blade, and fish length. Little difference in mortality rates among typical teleost (boney) fishes. Recent studies have demonstrated that blade strike survival can be greater than 90% at strike speeds up to 40 ft/s (12.1 m/s).
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria BLADE STRIKE
Blade strike survival is affected by: Blade shape Blade thickness Impact speed Fish length Numerical modeling has been used to evaluate effects of leading edge shapes on flow patterns and fish impact (EPRI 2008). Semicircular shape provided optimal fish deflection.
EPRI (2008)
What have we learned from conventional hydro? Turbine passage biocriteria BLADE STRIKE
Fish L = 10 inches; Blade t = 0.38 inches; V = 24 ft/s
EPRI (2008)
90
80
70
60
50
40 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
EPRI (2008)
The more recent studies have incorporated strike mortality rates to predict turbine passage survival (assuming other sources of mortality are inconsequential) NOAA Fisheries has accepted the results of a predictive approach for an endangered species at a conventional hydro project. These models can be modified and applied to hydrokinetic turbines to predict strike probability and survival rates.
Strike Mortality
PMS = KM n (Lsin) N / (60Vr) Where: KM is % mortality from strike
Observe fish behavior as they approach and interact with operating turbines.
Collect fish downstream with minimal stress and handlingrelated injury. Examine for immediate mortality, injuries, and scale loss. Hold live fish for 96hrs after turbine passage to assess latent mortality.
Test multiple species and size classes. Use control groups to determine handling and test related injury and mortality. Calculate precise and accurate estimates of turbine passage survival for selected turbine designs.
Immediate Survival (1 hr; %) 98.2 92.6 100.0 100.0 98.3 95.4 97.6 95.3 90.9 95.4
Total Survival (96 hr; %) 97.3 89.6 99.6 98.2 97.0 93.7 96.7 94.7 89.3 93.3
American eel 431 Sturgeon Alewife 103 76 38 Rainbow trout 85 172 Coho salmon 102
98.0 96.0
80 ft/345 rpm RBTrout at BEP 40 ft/240 rpm RBTrout off BEP 40 ft/240 rpm Sturgeon at BEP 40 ft/240 rpm Coho Salmon at BEP 40 ft/240 rpm SMBass at BEP 40 ft/240 rpm Alewife at BEP Strike Eq. with Ka (40 ft/240 rpm) Strike Eq. with Ka (80 ft/345 rpm)
94.0 92.0 90.0 88.0 86.0 84.0 82.0 80.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 75.0 100.0 125.0 150.0 175.0 200.0
Normal-speed Video
High-speed Video
Avoid conducting redundant studies by using information available from conventional hydro research. Eliminate or significantly reduce the need and cost of labor intensive and logistically difficult field studies. Resource and regulatory agencies provided with data and information they need to make informed decisions on aquatic resource impacts.
EPRI Alden Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory New Energy (Encurrent vertical axis turbine) Lucid Energy Technologies (Gorlovtype turbine) Canada Department of Fisheries & Ocean Alaska Energy Authority Alaska Power & Telephone Northwest Territories Power Corporation Government of the Northwest Territories Aurora Research Institute Indian and Northern Affairs Canada