You are on page 1of 11

PROBABILITY CLASSES AND GEOLOGICAL EVENTS IN GEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY CALCULATION

VJEROJATNOSNI RAZREDI I GEOLOKI DOGAAJI U IZRAUNU GEOLOKE VJEROJATNOSTI

Author:

Tomislav Malvi1, Miro urekovi1 i Igor Rusan2

INA-Oil Industry Plc., E&P of Oil and Gas, Reservoir Engineering & Field Development Department, ubieva 29, 10000 Zagreb

INA-Oil Industry Plc., E&P of Oil and Gas, Exploration Department, ubieva 29, 10000 Zagreb

Key words: Geological probability, categories, events, probability classes, Pannonian Basin Kljune rijei: geoloka vjerojatnost, kategorije,dogaaji, vjerojatnosni razredi, Panonski bazen

Saetak: U radu su opisani temeljni principi izraunavanja geoloke vjerojatnosti otkria leita ugljikovodika. Prikazana metodologija primijenjena je za procjenu potencijalnog otkria u hrvatskom dijelu Panonskog bazena. Upotrijebljen je deterministiki pristup koji ukljuuje pet geolokih kategorija (zamku, rezervoar, matine stijene, migraciju I ouvanje ugljikovodika), procjenjujui na taj nain geoloke dogaaje kojima je odreena geoloka graa naftnog sustava. Nainjena je znatna redukcija vjerojatnosnih razreda te je izraun mogue provjeriti na razliitim lokalitetima ili stratigrafskim jedinicama za koje je nainjen proraun. Odabrani vjerojatnosni razredi ukljuuju pet numerikih I tekstualnih vrijednosti, I to redom: 1.00 za dokazani, 0.75 za vrlo pouzdano odreen dogaaj, 0.50 za prilino pouzdan, 0.25 za nepouzdani te 0.05 za neopaeni ili nepostojei geoloki dogaaj. Metodologija je transparenta, odnosno moe jednostavno biti primijenjena u gotovo bilo kojem dijelu Panonskog bazenskog sustava.

Abstract: This paper considers the basic principles of geological probability calculation for hydrocarbon reservoir. Presented methodology is applied for evaluation of potential hydrocarbon discovery in Croatian part of Pannonian Basin. Applied deterministic approach included five geological categories (traps, reservoirs, source rocks, migration and hydrocarbon preservation), estimating geological events that could describe geological settings of petroleum systems. Significant reduction of probability classes make possible easily check different plays or prospects that could be estimated. Applied probability classes included five numerical and textual values as follows: 1.00 for proven, 0.75 for highly reliable, 0.50 for fairly reliable, 0.25 for unreliable and 0.05 for impossible prediction or missing geological event. Calculation procedure is made in the form of freeware

computer program. Such transparent methodology can easily be applied in almost any part of Pannonian Basin System.

INTRODUCTION

The goal of geological probability calculation is finding an appropriate numerical value, which can describe the probability of new hydrocarbon discoveries on observed area. This procedure could be applied both in exploration and/or development of hydrocarbon reservoirs.

Geological probability is defined as multiplication of the main geological factors or categories that define petroleum system. Reliability of data has the extraordinary importance. There is always balance between invested funds and collected data depends on reliability of geological database, predicted size of potential discovery and company budget. First step in that process of several activities is estimation of geological probability, calculated from acquired data. Testing dataset was collected from regional studies published for southern part of the Drava depression and the Bjelovar subdepression (Malvi, 1998, 2003). This mature area included all relevant geological categories stratigraphically described in Neogene and preNeogene sediments (Figure 1). Thickness of Neogene-Quaternary clastic sediments is mostly up to 3000 meters, with Mesozoic and Palaeozoic rocks in the basement. The highest hydrocarbon potential is attached to Lower and Middle Miocene coarse-grained clastites, accompanied with fractured and weathered basement rocks in unique hydrodynamic unit. Lower and Middle Miocene reservoirs and traps are relative shallow, located between 800 and 1500 meters. The second reservoir unit consists of Lower Pontian sandstone members. Unfortunately, these sandstones are characterized with very

instable reservoir properties and depth shallower than 1000 meters, what makes possible to hydrocarbon escaping along the faults as well as water degradation.

Figure 1. Categories of hydrocarbon system in analyzed area (Malvi et al., 2005)

Source rocks (Ottnangian to Badenian ages) are assumed inside two major synclines of subdepression, on depth between 1600 and 2500 meters. Catagenesis phase is reached only in the deepest parts, and it is why significant part of hydrocarbons migrated from northwestern part of the Drava depression. There are proven source rocks represented by mudstones, marls and siltites of Lower Miocene to Badenian age at depths greater than 3000 meters (Baric et al., 1998).

The potential for new hydrocarbon systems was calculated via five independent geological categories: (i) Structures; (ii) Reservoirs; (iii) Migration; (iv) Source rocks; and (v) Preservation of hydrocarbons. Calculation can be done for any play or prospect. Brown and Rose (2001) defined play as operational and prospect as economic unit. Rose (2001) and White (1992) described play as several, geologically similar, fields, discoveries or prospects. Here, the term play was used as substitution for stratigraphic interval(s) where are already discovered economic hydrocarbon reserves. There are two such plays: (a) basement rocks and Miocene breccia and (c) Pannonian and Pontian sandstones. Mostly structural traps inside analyzed area were selected from structural maps and palinspastic sections (Malvic, 1998, 2003).

GEOLOGICAL PROBABILITIES VIA CATEGORIES

Geological probability calculation procedures are well-known and simple tool for petroleum system description for decades. Generally, such calculation could be done allowing expert(s) to estimate probabilities of particular geological categories, using numerical values in the range 0.0-1.0 and using geological probability tables published for different petroleum provinces around the world. The approach applied in this paper was based on evaluation of five geological categories (according White, 1993): Category 1: probability of TRAP; Category 2: probability of RESERVOIR; Category 3: probability of SOURCE ROCKS; Category 4: probability of MIGRATION;

Category 5: probability of HC PRESERVATION.

Multiplication of these categories final result in Probability of Success of discovery: POS = p (trap ) p (reservoir ) p ( source _ rocks) p (migration) p ( HC _ preservation) (1)

The appropriate geological database, including characteristic geological categories and events, was derived from available dataset published in earlier regional study of the Bjelovar subdepression (Malvic, 1998, 2003). This database was organized in Access, and linked to executive computer code programmed in Delphi TM language (Brki et al., 2006), called GeoProb Modeling 1.0.2 (Figure 3). The program is freeware.

Figure 3. POS calculation in GeoProb Modeling 1.0.2

Each geological category could be evaluated from the different type of data, with very various qualities. Seismic mostly plays major role as base for structural and sometimes also stratigraphic interpretation. Addition important information is eventually existing production in analyzed play or close to estimated prospect. If such production exists, potential discovery can be classified as potential (not only hypothetical).

PROBABILITY CLASSES

Geological categories are always described through several probability classes). Each class has unique discrete numerical values in the range 0 and 1 that describes probability to occur selected event(s). We selected (only) five classes to correlate probability event by classification of reserves. As we know reserves as proven, possible, speculative and so on, there is deeply geological sense that such ranking cab be also applied in determination of petroleum system that include such reserves. It means that geological event or category can also be proven, highly or fairly probable, hypothetical or missing. According to such qualification geological events are described as:

1.00 for event in play/prospect described as Proven; 0.75 for event in play/prospect described as Highly reliable prediction; 0.50 for event in play/prospect described as Fairly reliable prediction; 0.25 for event in play/prospect described as Unreliable prediction; 0.05 for event in play/prospect described as Missing/Undefined parameter.

There is selected 62 geological events (and more than 100 options) though 5 categories and special database (Figure 3), as part of computer program GeoProb 1.0.2.

Figure 3. Database with 62 geological events classified in five probability classes

DISCUSSION

Present computer program can be used for geological probability calculation in any Neogene petroleum zone (play or prospect) in the southern part of Drava depression or the Bjelovar subdepression. Also, it can be applied in both in the entire Sava and Drava depressions, without any or with minor modifications represented in carefully reselection of geological events.

The proposed geological database represents is based on the five probability classes: 1.00 (proven), 0.75 (highly reliable predicted), 0.50 (fairly reliable predicted), 0.25 (unreliable predicted) and 0.05 (missing geological event).

It would be useful presented methodology upgrades by additional tool for estimation of seismic and production data. Both of these two groups included important information on reliability of data used for geological events selection.

REFERENCES

Brki, N., T. Malvi and I. Rusan, 2006, GeoProb Modeling 1.0 (computer program): Zagreb, www.mapconsult.net (freeware). Brown, P. J., and P. R. Rose, 2001, Plays and Concessions A Straightforward Method for Assessing Volumes, Value, and Chance (poster): AAPG Annual Meeting, Search and Discovery article #40024. Malvi, T., 1998, Strukturni i tektonski odnosi, te znaajke ugljikovodika ire okolice naftnoga polja Galovac-Pavljani: Zagreb, Master thesis, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, 111 p. Malvi, T., 2003, Oil-Geological Relations and Probability of Discovering New Hydrocarbon Reserves in the Bjelovar Sag: Zagreb, Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, 123 p. Malvi, T., J. Veli, and Z. Peh, 2005, Qualitative-Quantitative Analyses of the Influence of Depth and Lithological Composition on Lower Pontian Sandstone Porosity in the Central Part of Bjelovar Sag (Croatia): Geologia Croatica, v. 58, p. 73-85.

Rose, P. R., 2001, Risk Analysis and Management of Petroleum Exploration Ventures: Tulsa, AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, 12, 164 p. White, D. A., 1992, Selecting and Assessing Plays, in R. Steinmets, ed., AAPG Business of Petroleum Exploration: Treatise of Petroleum Geology, Chapter 8: Tulsa, p. 87-94. White, D. A., 1993, Geologic Risking Guide for Prospects and Plays: AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, p. 2048-2061.