You are on page 1of 32

PRESENTATION AGENDA

Issue #1 Concussions Issue #2 Antitrust Issue #3 Labor Negotiations

ISSUE #1: CONCUSSIONS


Background
The NFL has been aware of concussions for the past 25 years, but since June 2007, it has become a major concern in the athletic community Highlights
Published studies linking head injuries to higher rates of dementia and cognitive disabilities Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) Four deaths of former NFL players in recent years

ISSUE #1 STAKEHOLDERS
NFL Commissioner Interests: Player safety and retention of antitrust exemption status Power: Change policies on concussion diagnosis, treatment, and return-to-play guidelines Coalitions: Players union and house committees NFL Head, Neck and Spine Committee Interests: Strengthen the NFLs leadership role in research, education, prevention, and treatment of head and spine injuries in sports Power: Direct influence on NFL health and safety policies

ISSUE #1 STAKEHOLDERS
NFL Players Interests: Member of a club, to earn high income, be competitive, and avoid injuries Power: Support organizations policies on health and injury prevention Coalitions: Players union and associations NFL Sports Commentators Interest: Employment, love of the sport, performance analysis Power: Increase the awareness of illegal hitting and the health impacts (head trauma)

ISSUE #1 STAKEHOLDERS
House Energy and Commerce Committee Interests: Players health Power: Political; investigating and reporting specialized subjects, encourage the creation of legislation, influence on public health issues and legislation House Judiciary Committee Interests: Justice w/in federal courts, admin agencies, and federal law enforcement entities Power: Legal; enforcement of justice Coalitions: Administrative Law, Process & Procedure Project

ISSUE #1: ALTERNATIVES


Enforcement of Return-to-Play guidelines Team physicians adherence to players health Increase illegal hit penalty cost Assign independent neurologist to NFL clubs Discussion

ISSUE #1: RECOMMENDATION


NFL crackdown on tackles involving helmet contact Suspend players for dangerous and flagrant hits that violate rules Educate players on how to tackle Make traumatic brain injuries suffered by players a priority for the NFL

ISSUE #1: IMPLEMENTATION


Human
Add neurological specialist to athletic medical team

Monetary
Continue investments in research and implementation of prevention practices

Technological
Develop effective tackle practices

ISSUE #2: ANTITRUST

ISSUE #2: BACKGROUND


American Needle, Inc. vs. National Football League NFL grants Reebok exclusive headwear license in 2001 American Needle sues NFL claiming violation of antitrust law NFL argues in District Court that it is a single entity immune from antitrust Appeals Court finds for NFL, upholding single entity finding

ISSUE #2: BACKGROUND


American Needle, Inc. vs. National Football League Supreme Court rejects argument that joint licensing is only way to market NFL brand Supreme Court returns case to lower court for trial on issue of whether scheme is a unreasonable restraint on trade Antitrust issue currently resolved as Supreme Court held that the NFL does not have a blanket antitrust exemption. American Needle and all new cases will be tried using test set down by Supreme Court

ISSUE #2 STAKEHOLDERS
NFL Agenda is expanding the antitrust exemption as far as possible. Interest is to allow them to act in ways that will maximize revenues for the league (owners). Resources are their access to what are presumably excellent lawyers, and the ability to fund litigation as new cases are brought.

Team Owners Agenda is the same as NFL, maximizing the antitrust exemption benefits the owners. Interest is that a broader exemption will maximize revenues. Resources are their ability to fund the litigation that the NFL engages in.

ISSUE #2 STAKEHOLDERS
American Needle Agenda is to be back as a vendor of gear to individual teams, by defeating claim of an antitrust exemption. Interest is that they will increase their revenue if they return as vendor of gear. Resources may be limited financially, but they were joined by other parties in the Supreme Court litigation, including the Sports Law Program at Tulane University Law School.

Players Union Agenda is to see the broad antitrust exemption defeated. Interest is a concern that owners could claim an exemption when negotiating player contracts, though labor law governs collective bargaining. Resources allowed them to file brief in support of American Needle in Supreme Court case.

ISSUE #2 STAKEHOLDERS
Players Agenda is to see the broad antitrust exemption defeated. Interest is a concern that owners could claim an exemption when negotiating player contracts, though labor law governs collective bargaining. Resources allowed their union to file brief in support of American Needle in Supreme Court case. Coaches Agenda is to see the broad antitrust exemption defeated. Interest is a concern that owners could claim an exemption when negotiating coachs contracts. Resources allowed the coaches association to file brief in support of American Needle in Supreme Court case.

ISSUE #2: ALTERNATIVES


Court has given NFL a potential victory, though it did not do so directly Decision of courts on case-by-case basis will decide this Making claim that NFL was entitled to blanket antitrust exemption could have backfired, need to be careful not to overreach again Do nothing Case is before lower court, not an option Need to actively pursue a victory in lower court Not participating isnt an option Legislative Unsuccessful in past, but pursuing blanket exemption with Congress could be best way to avoid potentially unpredictable court decisions and get what NFL apparently wants Continuing the NFLs lobbying of Congress and individual team owners financial support of individual members may be best path to success

Discussion

ISSUE #2: RECOMMENDATION


The implementation of the NFLs strategic plan in regards to antitrust should begin by them waiting out the lower courts decision on their exemption in American Needle.
If lower court finds against them then they need to be prepared to appeal, and if they win they need to be prepared to respond to appeal.

There is limited short-term monetary impact, other than litigation costs.


Need to marshal resources for future litigation and lobbying to expand the antitrust exemption.

ISSUE #2: RECOMMENDATION


The attitudes/values of top management are critical here. It was potentially dangerous to seek the antitrust exemption that NFL desired in the initial case. Congress has already rejected this Supreme court could have ruled completely against NFL More humility, pursuing desired exemption incrementally in cases, while still lobbying Congress would have taken longer and been more expensive, but less perilous

ISSUE #3: BACKGROUND


Contentious Issues
Season Length and Compensation Network TV Contracts Annual Revenue Allocation Player Cost Allocation Franchise financial disclosure Salary Caps / Minimum Salary Threshold

Common Ground
Cap on Rookie Contracts Revenue Allocation to Veterans and Retirees Avoid a Lockout

ISSUE #3: US CONGRESS

ISSUE #3: STAKEHOLDERS


Franchise Owners Interests: Increase revenue and decrease costs in new CBA Power: Ability to lockout players, secured revenue stream, lobbying influence, anti-trust exemption (maybe) Coalitions: Congress, Media Industry

NFL Players Interests: Protect player interests (compensation, health, safety) Power: Public support, lawsuit option Coalitions: NFLPA, Congress, Support Personnel, Impacted Vendors

ISSUE #3: STAKEHOLDERS


Support Personnel Interests: Maintain employment Power: Minimal Coalitions: Minimal Local Economies Interests: Avoid lockout and depressed revenue stream Power: Minimal unless organized Coalitions: Congress, vendor coalitions

ISSUE #3: STAKEHOLDERS


Congress Interests: Protect national sport and growth industry, avoid public backlash Power: Anti-trust exemption, political power, access to resources Coalitions: Minimal Media Interests: Protect advertising revenue stream and established programming schedule Power: Public exposure/opinion Coalitions: Franchise owners, Congress

ISSUE #3: ALTERNATIVES


Avoid Interference in Negotiations Hire an Independent Negotiator Mediate Negotiations Accept Lockout Likelihood and Establish Replacement League Petition Congress to Act to Prevent Lockout Discussion

ISSUE #3: IMPLEMENTATION


Financial
Encourage those banks financing franchises to extend grace periods for loan defaults through the end of 2011 season Lobby Congress for increased tax subsidies for stadiums Establish reserve accounts to meet player healthcare and salary shortfalls

Legal
Discourage the decertification of the NFLPA Operate in accordance with any anti-trust rulings and existing labor law provisions

ISSUE #3: IMPLEMENTATION


Public Relations
Continue lobbying efforts to shore up Congressional support , in the event of a lockout Devise strategic league priorities that will dictate any intervention activities (avoid alliance with either owners or players) Protect NFL against public backlash by implementing provisions to protect secondary stakeholders local economies and support personnel

You might also like