Professional Documents
Culture Documents
White Paper
Executive summary
When reality changes, the old best practices no longer suffice. The reality of business processes has significantly shifted. To deal with business megatrends such as mass customization and customer self-service, administrative processes have become more knowledge-intensive. In addition to traditional business process management techniques and technologies, new practices and technologies are needed to enable what analyst firm Forrester calls dynamic case management. In this paper, we explain how the transition can be made from process-based operations to a more case-based focus. We also explain how business processes can be tested to establish their level of knowledge-intensiveness and, if relevant, the extent to which this needs to be improved. Finally, we outline the principles which constitute the foundation of the Be Informed business process platform. Be Informed is an internationally operating, independent software vendor. The Be Informed business process platform supports administrative processes, which are becoming increasingly knowledge-intensive. Thanks to Be Informeds unique approach to dynamic case management, the next wave after business process management, organizations using Be Informed often report cost savings of tens of percents. Further benefits include a much higher straight-through processing rate leading to vastly improved productivity, and a reduction in time-to-change from months to days.
Introduction
Reduce complexity is one of the most important mantras in the board room. Complexity of processes, complexity of systems and the complexity of the organization itself. Complexity is the enemy of control, and most organizations feel that increased control is of key importance in order for their business to survive and thrive. As logical as it may sound and even feel, this intuitive reflex may very well turn out to be wrong. Wrong and, in the worst-case scenario, damaging to future business performance potential. Complexity is a natural phenomenon; it is simply the way the world is, with all its diversity and change. But there is a difference between what makes the world complex and what makes it complicated. Complicatedness is a human concept. It encompasses all the systems, processes and exceptions organizations have created. Over the years, companies have built complicated systems and processes, but this has rarely given them greater control. On the contrary: complicatedness leads to less control, inefficient operations and a growing distance from the customer. Consider the following examples: An insurance company that has a strong customer intimacy strategy wants to offer personalized cover, based on age, sociodemographics, asset value to be insured, and customer preference. This could easily result in billions of combined forms of cover. Should the IT department inform the CEO that the systems are unable to handle the complexity, and that the company should settle for standard products and services? Within a countrys immigration service, civil servants assess whether applicants should be granted a visa, the right to work or live in that country, or that countrys nationality. They have to deal with tens of thousands of rules, ranging from country-specific regulations to supranational legislation such as European Union policies and the specifics of the many treaties with other countries. Furthermore, rules change multiple times each year. Would it be acceptable for the agency to reject changes because its processes, systems and organizational activities cannot handle the complexity? A hospital wants to redesign its processes. Old-style optimization would consist of large batches of similar appointments and procedures, resulting in multiple visits for patients. Now, it wants to schedule all appointments and procedures for a patient on a single day where possible. However, some examinations require the patient to abstain from eating, while others require them to have a full stomach. Again, the many pre and
postconditions for procedures could easily lead to billions of combinations. How can full observance of the conditions be ensured? Complexity cannot be reduced. In attempting to achieve this, processes, systems, people and organizations create bottlenecks which obstruct the process of dealing with the natural complexity in the world. Instead, a competitive advantage in the private sector or sustainable government in the public sector can be achieved through a different competence: embracing complexity. A McKinsey report outlined the business case: If complexity, in all its aspects, is seen as a challenge to be managed and potentially exploited, not as a problem to be eliminated, businesses can generate additional sources of profit and competitive advantage. Companies reporting low complexity [which we refer to as complicatedness] had the highest returns on capital employed and returns on invested capital. 1
Embrace complexity
In order to embrace complexity, we need to shift from a control-driven approach towards an approach of empowerment. This means enabling your customers, call center agents, citizens and so forth, to go with the flow. In other words, providing them with the means to do their job, instead of telling them what to do. This may sound risky, but the opposite is true. It may have been risky in traditional business management, but if reality shifts, so must best practices.
S-curves
Reality shifts like S-curves. A new trend starts slowly, takes off and becomes the new paradigm and best practice. Then, at a given moment, something unexpected happens2. The list of possible disruptions is endless: the introduction of Sarbanes-Oxley regulations turned business operations around; the credit crunch turned public opinion on business conduct around; globalization turned corporate thinking around. A new way of working is needed, as the old ways no longer suffice. Usually, new ways of working are not as proven, and their return is also lower. In fact, after a new S-curve has been adopted, business performance can drop even further before it goes up. Then the new S-curve becomes the next best-practice, until, at a given moment, something unexpected happens again (see figure 1).
Figure 1: S-curves
This moment is often referred to as a black swan. A black swan represents something thought impossible (within the existing view of the world).
If trends develop like S-curves in general, then trends in the world of business processes most likely follow the same pattern. Indeed, they have already in the past. From the beginning of the industrial revolution to the days of Frederick Taylors scientific management, manufacturing processes were optimized through mass production. Most people would be familiar with the quote that the T-Model Ford could be delivered in any color so long as it is black. Today, this could not be further from the truth. Cars, and other manufactured products, can often be ordered in millions of different configurations, and every product can be a unique combination of characteristics. Today, mass customization is the norm a new S-curve. Administrative processes have roughly followed the same path. In the 1980s, business process re-engineering brought the first levels of operational excellence for administrative processes, making back offices lean and efficient. Much faster than in manufacturing, and almost seamlessly, the next S-curve followed.
In of
Mass customization
Every transaction is a unique instance Goal-driven Continuous change, business-driven Keep options open, stick to reality Knowledge-intensive Embrace complexity
Case-based approach
Non-linear, fuzzy, case-based processes Knowledge-based environments (why it needs to be done, what it contributes to the goal) Build the guardrails Top-down, deductive The process follows the user Semantic, business in control Declarative innovative business process platform, using ontological metamodels
Once you focus on the case, the old logic of having to fully define a process upfront disappears. The actual process which will be different as each transaction is passing through the process in a (slightly) different way becomes nothing more than a metamodel that states only what has to be done instead of how and in which order. To use a metaphor, instead of defining a road, like a traditional process does, the metamodel only defines the guard rails. This new way of thinking, referred to as dynamic case management by analyst firm Forrester, also requires a different analytical approach. Today, business processes are often defined inductively. This means that after many specific processes have been defined, more generic business rules appear. These new insights can be applied when these predefined processes are revisited. The advantage of this method is that it is easy to understand and to follow; the disadvantage is that it has led to the process spaghetti that many organizations suffer from today. A metamodel approach benefits more from a deductive approach, putting the process metamodel together first. Individual transactions then all use components of this metamodel to effectively create the singleinstance process. This is a sequence of steps derived from the metamodel to process a single transaction. Once the metamodel is approved, billions of different combinations can be made, while the metamodel ensures every single instance is valid. The advantage of the deductive approach is its agility; the disadvantage is that its comprehension requires more conceptual thinking. Putting the case in the middle greatly reduces the complicatedness of business process landscapes. It simplifies the organization and allows organizations to embrace the inevitable complexity presented by their environment.
Knowledge-intensive
Mass customization in administration, every transaction looks different Requires human judgment, high ambiguity Non-trivial impact of regulatory requirements Operational decisions require explanation to customers Contextual information is unstructured or not always available Easy terms and goodwill-sensitive Transactions and business rules are non-discrete and interconnected Transactions are processed in consultation with the customer
Table 3: Knowledge-intensive processes The more statements you have chosen in the right column of the table, the more knowledge-intensive your business processes are or should be. And the more knowledge-intensive your business processes, the more you need to embrace complexity.
http://blogs.hbr.org/bigshift/2010/04/are-all-employees-knowledge-wo.html
Figure 2: A Be Informed ontology depicting a subsidy case An ontology is a formal representation of knowledge as a set of concepts within a domain and the relationships between those concepts. The relationships, in the form of pre and postconditions, define the boundaries of a process. They say what needs to be done in order for the transaction to be completed successfully, but without specifying the exact method. For example: If Activity A has a precondition for a certain result as input, then another activity that produces that result needs to be completed first, irrespective of which activity produces that specific result. If Activity A needs to produce a result, this is called a postcondition. Typical postconditions include creation of documents, assessments or data elements for potential next activities. Some activities are geared towards decision-making. This can be in the form of a calculation or classification, for instance. These decisions typically require multiple preconditions, and are communicated through a single postcondition.
10
11
The dynamic activity plan is the guard rail of the Be Informed solution that is always active. It depicts the ontology in three intuitive ways: The current activities that you can perform if you wish to. There is no prescribed order for the current activities; users can choose which activity they prefer to perform first, based on their own insights, their discussions with the customer or their own preference. The processed activities are those which have been completed already. However, should new information arise, these activities can be repeated easily, without the necessity of restarting the process. Repeating activities immediately updates the status in the dynamic activity plan, retriggering other processed activities, current activities and future activities. Future activities that cannot yet be processed. The preconditions of these activities state that the information available for them is insufficient, and further information needs to be generated by other activities first. Whether activities should be processed manually, based on human interpretation of facts, or can be processed straight through, depends on design choices or the level of ambiguity of the available information.
12
About Be Informed
Be Informed is an internationally operating, independent software vendor. The Be Informed business process platform supports administrative processes, which are becoming increasingly knowledge-intensive. Thanks to Be Informeds unique approach to dynamic case management, the next wave after business process management, organizations using Be Informed often report cost savings of tens of percents. Further benefits include a much higher straight-through processing rate leading to vastly improved productivity, and a reduction in time-to-change from months to days. Author: Frank Buytendijk Contributing authors: Jan Willem Ebbinge, Linda Muselaars and Geert Rensen
13
Be Informed Wapenrustlaan 11-31 7321 DL Apeldoorn [Type a quote from the The Netherlands T document or the summary of an +31 (0)55 368 14 20 interesting point. E info@beinformed.com You can position the text box www.beinformed.com anywhere in the document. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.]