Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Many shop people think three-axis accuracy and 3D accuracy are the same. The truth is that three-axis accuracy is one-dimensional because it specifies only the tolerance of linear measurements along each axis. 3D accuracy refers to linear measurement of each axis and the relationship of the X, Y and Z axes to one another is that, the straightness and squareness of each axis to one another within a defined work cube. Calibrating three-axis accuracy is relatively simple and is useful for identifying such problems as leadscrew / ballscrew pitch error or wear. Calibrating 3D accuracy is more complicated but doesnot necessarily take more time. However, it is a much better way to ensure the overall performance of a machine when cutting contoured surfaces and other 3D parts designed with 3D CAD software. For any shop, knowing when and how to do these different calibrations is important because each provides different information about machine performance. The basic concept of this method is that the laser beam direction (or the measurement direction) is not parallel to the motion of the linear axis. Therefore, the measured displacement errors are sensitive to errors that occur both parallel and perpendicular to the direction of the linear axis. More precisely, the measured linear errors are the vector sum of all errors projected to the direction of the laser beam, including the displacement errors (parallel to the linear axis) the vertical straightness errors (perpendicular to the linear axis) and the horizontal straightness errors (perpendicular to the linear axis and the vertical straightness error direction)
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
3D or 3axis Calibration
Carefully consider all the methods and their tradeoffs to ensure that the standardized process for defining 3D (volumetric) accuracy is accurate and accepted by those who will be using it.
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
ERROR
For making a object there will be consider the error in all axis in all level of the machine. According to Taylor's linear expansion theory there requires 45 measurements to determine the 3D (volumetric) accuracy of a 3-axis machine tool. It's not practical to require 45 different measurements for determining 3D accuracy. The cost for a service technician to perform these measurements and the several days the machine would be out of service make it cost prohibitive. So here the rigid body method is considered. The rigid body method considers 21 errors, including:
Three linear displacement errors Three vertical straightness errors Three horizontal straightness errors Three roll angular errors Three pitch angular errors Three yaw angular errors Three squareness errors The 3D (volumetric) error is de fined as the root-mean-square sum of the total of
these errors. The maximum and minimum absolute errors can be defined as the maximum and minimum absolute errors in the volume. Using a conventional laser interferometer for measuring the straightness and squareness errors requires an excessive amount of time, which is cost prohibitive. As a result, the rigid body method has not achieved a high level of acceptance.
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
2. 3D CALIBRATION
The ASME B5.54 and ISO230-6 standards resulted in two methods for 3D (volumetric) calibration, including the body diagonal displacement method and the proprietary sequential step diagonal measurement method. For years, the body diagonal displacement method defined by ASME B5.54 and ISO 230-6 has provided a quick check of volumetric error with good results. Because the measurements involved are relatively simple and quick to make, the cost and machine downtime are minimal. The body diagonal displacement method is a measurement of the volumetric positioning accuracy of a machine tool with a laser calibration system. A laser is mounted on the machine bed, and a retroreflector mounted on the spindle reflects the laser beam, which is aligned along the machine diagonal. With the laser pointing along the body diagonal direction and the retroreflector moving along the body diagonal at operator-specified increments, the laser calibration system records measurements at each position. Measuring the displacement error begins at the home position and at each increment along the three axes, which move together to reach a new position along the diagonal. The last four body diagonals use the same corners as the first four diagonals, except the directions are reversed. For that reason, there are only four body diagonal directions with forward movement and reverse movement (bi-directional) and only four setups in which measurements are taken after each simultaneous move of X, Y and Z. The accuracy of each position along the body diagonal depends on the positioning accuracy of all three axes and geometrical errors of the machine tool. In theory based on the calculation, the four body diagonal displacement errors are sensitive to all nine linear errors, which may be positive or negative; and these nine may cancel each other out. Because the errors are statistical in nature, the probability that all of the errors will be cancelled in all of the positions and in all four of the body diagonals is theoretically possible but highly unlikely.
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
However, the body diagonal displacement method does not clarify the relationships between the body diagonal displacement errors and the 21 possible rigid body errors. Another concern about this method is that it assigns too much importance to angular errors. To understand the relationships and importance of angular errors, it is necessary to derive the relations between the 21 rigid body errors and the measured body diagonal displacement errors. Based on the above-derived relations, all the angular error terms are cancelled except for two. Therefore, the body diagonal displacement errors are sensitive to displacement errors, straightness errors and squareness errors but not angular errors. Because there are only four sets of data and nine sets of errors, the body diagonal displacement method does not generate enough information to determine the source of errors. Optodyne, a company that develops and markets laser calibration systems, developed the sequential step diagonal method to address these issues.
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
Laser Vector method for volumetric calibration The basic concept of this method is that the laser beam direction (or the measurement direction) is not parallel to the motion of the linear axis. Therefore, the measured displacement errors are sensitive to errors that occur both parallel and perpendicular to the direction of the linear axis. More precisely, the measured linear errors are the vector sum of all errors projected to the direction of the laser beam, including the displacement errors (parallel to the linear axis) the vertical straightness errors (perpendicular to the linear axis) and the horizontal straightness errors (perpendicular to the linear axis and the vertical straightness error direction). Collecting data with the laser beam pointing in four body diagonal directions identifies all 12 types of errors. Because the errors of each axis of motion are vectors with three perpendicular error components, this is considered a vector measurement technique
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
10
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
Figure 1: Schematic diagram 3d-calibration device of micro systems metrology frame which is at present equipped with two laser interferometers, allows Abbe error-free 2D microstructure probing in the nanometer range. The positional information and the probe signals can be simultaneously measured with a probing frequency of 5 kHz. Systematic investigations into the efficiency of the calibration device, which had first been realized with two-dimensional interferometric positional metrology, have been carried out. The positioning noise of the x- and y-axes amounts to 12 nmp-p in a detection bandwith of 5 kHz. Special probing strategies for microprobing systems have been tested. In the case of one-dimensional probing of an aluminium plate, a standard deviation of 20 nm was determined for the points probed. This order of magnitude is sufficient for the investigation of the dynamic properties and the calibration of 3D microprobing systems.
11
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
12
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
3D position and the diameter are automatically effected. Moreover, during the fully-automated inline mode, the measurements are completely controlled by the program. The target/actual comparison is executed under position- and rotation-invariancy by steric transformation. Thus, a precise positioning or guidance of the objects is not necessary. The cameras are delivered with precision lenses from Schneider-Kreuznach and different sensors with up to 6 mega pixels. Optionally, white, red, or infrared ring-lights as well as structured laser-lights are available. Furthermore, a high-end version of the PrOMPT.stereo camera system for up to 100 Hz recording frequency can be received.
13
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
14
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
True volumetric error includes three linear displacement errors, six straightness errors, and three squareness errors. True error (ELSv) can be defined as the root mean square sum of all the three errors in each axis direction. When using body diagonal displacement error measurement, body diagonal error (Ed) does not include squareness errors. But Ed is currently defined in ISO 230-6 and ASME B5.54 as a measure of volumetric error. Squareness errors can be included, and our new proposed measure volumetric error, ESd, includes squareness errors. Some definitions: ppp/nnn indicates body diagonal direction with the increments in X, Y, and Z all positive/negative, and npp/pnn indicates the increments in X, Y, and Z are negative/positive, positive/negative, and positive/negative, etc. Body diagonal errors in each direction are Dr(r) ppp/nnn, Dr(r) npp/pnn, Dr(r) pnp/npn, Dr(r) ppn/nnp. Based on the definition in ISO 230-6, E is defined as: Eppp/nnn=Max[Dr(r)ppp/nnn]-min[Dr(r)ppp/nnn] Enpp/pnn=Max[Dr(r)npp/pnn]-min[Dr(r)npp/pnn] Epnp/npn=Max[Dr(r)pnp/npn]-min[Dr(r)pnp/npn] Eppn/nnp=Max[Dr(r)ppn/nnp]-min[Dr(r)ppn/nnp]. And volumetric error is defined as: Ed=Max[Eppp/nnn, Enpp/pnn, Epnp/npn, Eppn/nnp]. This definition doesn't include squareness errors. To include squareness errors, define the volumetric error thusly: ESd=Max[Dr(r)ppp/nnn, Dr(r)npp/pnn, Dr(r)pnp/npn, Dr(r)ppn/nnp]-min[Dr(r)pp/nnn, Dr(r)npp/pnn, Dr(r)pnp/ npn, Dr(r)ppn/nnp]. The definition ELv is still commonly used as the definition of 3-D volumetric error, and ELSv including straightness and squareness errors is true volumetric error. The Ed is defined in ISO230-6 and ASME B5.54 as a measure of volumetric error. We propose ESd, including squareness errors, as a measure of volumetric error.
15
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
Measurements conducted on 10 mid-size machining centers reveal that when compared to true 3-D volumetric error ELSv, ELv underestimates volumetric error. The Ed underestimates true volumetric error and varies with squareness errors. Finally, ESd underestimates 3-D volumetric position error but is relatively stable and not influenced by squareness errors. Thus ESd is a good measure of volumetric error.
16
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
3. CONCLUSION
Minimizing 3D errors has become increasingly important because machine tools are experiencing longer duty cycles and substantially faster spindle speeds, feed rates, and traverse rates, amplifying wear on machine tool positioning components and assemblies. Here a good method is introduced for eliminating the volumetric error by the machine movement. This high accuracy (1 : 10,000) can be achieved by the highly precise system calibration. Caused by newly developed 3D calibration bodies and a special mathematic model, the calibration is not only highly accurate but also easy to handle. An assistant leads through the calibration process, therefore also unskilled users can handle it.
17
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
REFERENCES
[1] Schultschik, R., The components of the volumetric accuracy, Annals of the CIRP, Vol.25, No.1, pp223-228, 1977. [2] Methods for Performance Evaluation of Computer Numerically Controlled Machining Centers, An American National Standard, ASME B5.54-1992 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p69, 1992. [3] ISO 230-6: 2002 Test code for machine tools Part 6: Determination of positioning accuracy on body and face diagonals (Diagonal displacement tests), an International Standard, by International Standards Organization, 2002 Modern Machine Tools- The industrial source book ( January 1st week edition )
Web Addresses
[1] http://www.optodyne.com/opnew4/www.toolingandproduction.com [2] http://www. Sourceonline.in [3] www.Googleimage.Com.in [4] www.InscoTemperature.com [5] www.superd.com.cn/en/
18
AWH PTC
3D or 3axis Calibration
VOTE OF THANKS
First of all I express my sincere gratitude to all who supported me in presenting the seminar especially my teachers and friends.
19
AWH PTC