Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Monitoring Priorities and
Indicators
1. Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who receive the
early intervention services on
their IFSPs in a timely manner.
[Compliance Indicator]
2. Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who primarily
receive early intervention
services in the home or
programs for typically
developing children.
[Results Indicator]
3. Percent of infants and toddlers
with IFSPs who demonstrate
improved:
A. Positive social-emotional
skills (including social
relationships);
B. Acquisition and use of
knowledge and skills
(including early language/
communication); and
FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Status
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 96.74%. This
represents slippage from the FFY
2004 data of 100%. The State did
not meet its FFY 2005 target of
100%.
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 95.52%. This
represents slippage from FFY 2004
data of 95.81%. The State’s FFY
target is 95% or above.
The State reported that prior
noncompliance related to this
indicator was corrected in a timely
manner.
Entry data provided.
OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
As required by OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter, the State confirmed
in the February 1, 2007 APR that the starting date for its timeline is when a
parent consents to the provision of early intervention services.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts and looks forward to reviewing data in the
FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008 that demonstrate compliance with the
timely service provision requirements in 34 CFR §§303.340(c), 303.342(e) and
303.344(f)(1).
The State revised the FFY 2004 SPP baseline data and targets for this indicator to
95.81% in its SPP and OSEP accepts those revisions. While the State’s targets
do not demonstrate an increase from its revised FFY 2004 baseline data, because
the State reported more than 95% of infants and toddlers received services in
natural environments, there is no expectation that an increase in that percentage
is necessary.
The State’s FFY 2005 APR data indicates that more than 95% of infants and
toddlers with disabilities primarily received early intervention services in the
natural environment. OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to ensure and improve
performance and expects that the State monitors the service settings identified in
the individualized family services plans (IFSPs) to ensure that they contain a
statement of the natural environments in which early intervention services will
appropriately be provided, including a justification of the extent, if any, to which
services will not be provided in the natural environment.
The State reported the required entry data and activities. The State must provide
progress data and improvement activities with the FFY 2006 APR, due February
1, 2008.
As required by OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter, the State informed
OSEP in the February 1, 2007 APR that it will not sample for this indicator, but
instead will collect census data.
Page 1
 Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Monitoring Priorities and Status OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
Indicators

C. Use of appropriate
behaviors to meet their
needs.
[Results Indicator; New]

4. Percent of families The State’s FFY 2005 reported The State provided baseline data, targets and improvement activities. OSEP
participating in Part C who baseline data for this indicator are: accepts the SPP for this indicator.
report that early intervention
A. 92.11% As required by OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter, the State submitted
services have helped the
with the February 1, 2007 APR a revised sampling plan for this indicator, but
family: B. 83.55%
also informed OSEP that beginning in FFY 2006, the State will survey all parents
A. Know their rights; C. 88.16% of infants and toddlers receiving early intervention services to report under this
indicator.
B. Effectively communicate
their children's needs; and
C. Help their children develop
and learn.
[Results Indicator; New]

5. Percent of infants and toddlers The State’s FFY 2005 reported data The State met its target and OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts to improve
birth to 1 with IFSPs compared for this indicator under IDEA performance.
to: section 618 are 1.35%. The State
met its FFY 2005 target of 1.23%.
A. Other States with similar
eligibility definitions; and
B. National data.
[Results Indicator]

6. Percent of infants and toddlers
birth to 3 with IFSPs compared
to:
A. Other States with similar
eligibility definitions; and
B. National data.
[Results Indicator]
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data OSEP looks forward to the State’s data demonstrating improvement in
for this indicator under IDEA performance in the FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008.
section 618 are 2.03%. This
represents slippage from FFY 2004
data of 2.04%. The State did not
meet its FFY 2005 target of 2.05%.

FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table Page 2


Monitoring Priorities and
Indicators
7. Percent of eligible infants and
toddlers with IFSPs for whom
an evaluation and assessment
and an initial IFSP meeting
were conducted within Part C’s
45-day timeline.
[Compliance Indicator]
8A. Percent of all children exiting
Part C who received timely
transition planning to support
the child’s transition to
preschool and other appropriate
community services by their
third birthday including:
A. IFSPs with transition steps
and services;
[Compliance Indicator]
FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Status
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 96.75%. This
represents progress from the revised
FFY 2004 data of 88.09%. The
State did not meet the FFY 2005
target of 100%.
The State reported that prior
noncompliance related to this
indicator was corrected in a timely
manner.
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 97.82%. This
represents progress from the revised
FFY 2004 data of 88.03%. The
State did not meet the FFY 2005
target of 100%.
The State reported aggregated data
for Indicator 8 (rather than
disaggregated by sub-indicators)
showing that 5 of 6 findings of
noncompliance identified in FFY
2004 were corrected in a timely
manner.
OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
The State revised the FFY 2004 baseline for this indicator in its SPP and OSEP
accepts that revision.
OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter required the State to include in the
February 1, 2007 APR, progress data from all sites monitored and FFY 2004
baseline data for five sites not reported in the FFY 2004 SPP. As indicated, the
State revised its FFY 2004 baseline data to include data not previously reported.
In addition, the State reported in the February 1, 2007 APR, that its FFY 2005
data included monitoring data collected from all 26 early intervention service
sites.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts and looks forward to reviewing data in the
FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008 that demonstrate compliance with the 45-
day timeline requirements in 34 CFR §§303.321(e)(2), 303.322(e)(1) and
303.342(a).
The State revised the FFY 2004 baseline for this indicator in its SPP and OSEP
accepts that revision.
OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter required the State to include in the
February 1, 2007 APR, progress data from all sites monitored and FFY 2004
baseline data for five sites not reported in the FFY 2004 SPP. As indicated, the
State revised its FFY 2004 baseline data to include data not previously reported.
In addition, in the February 1, 2007 APR, the State reported that its FFY 2005
data included monitoring data collected from all 26 early intervention service
sites.
The State reported that additional technical assistance and monitoring were
conducted in the site that did not timely correct its noncompliance related to
Indicator 8.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts and looks forward to reviewing data in the
FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008 that demonstrate compliance with the
requirements in 34 CFR §§303.148(b)(4) and 303.344(h).
Page 3

Monitoring Priorities and
Indicators
8B. Percent of all children exiting
Part C who received timely
transition planning to support
the child’s transition to
preschool and other appropriate
community services by their
third birthday including:
B. Notification to LEA, if
child potentially eligible for
Part B; and
[Compliance Indicator]
8C. Percent of all children exiting
Part C who received timely
transition planning to support
the child’s transition to
preschool and other appropriate
community services by their
third birthday including:
C. Transition conference, if
child potentially eligible for
Part B.
[Compliance Indicator]
9. General supervision system
(including monitoring,
complaints, hearings, etc.)
identifies and corrects
noncompliance as soon as
possible but in no case later
than one year from
identification.
[Compliance Indicator]
FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Status
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 100%. The
State met its target for FFY 2005.
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 99.42%. This
represents progress from the revised
FFY 2004 data of 85.90%.
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 95.88%. This
represents progress from the revised
FFY 2004 data of 86.15%. The
State did not meet the FFY 2005
target of 100%.
OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
The State revised the FFY 2004 baseline for this indicator in its SPP and OSEP
accepts that revision.
OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter required the State to include in the
February 1, 2007 APR, progress data from all sites monitored and FFY 2004
baseline data for five sites not reported in the SPP. As indicated, the State
revised its FFY 2004 baseline data to include data not previously reported. In
addition, in the February 1, 2007 APR, the State reported that its FFY 2005 data
included monitoring data collected from all 26 early intervention service sites.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts in achieving compliance and looks forward
to reviewing data in the FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008 that demonstrate
continuing compliance with the requirements in 34 CFR §303.148(b)(1).
The State revised the FFY 2004 baseline for this indicator in its SPP and OSEP
accepts the State’s revision.
OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter required the State to include in the
February 1, 2007 APR, progress data from all sites monitored and FFY 2004
baseline data for the five sites not reported in the FFY 2004 SPP. As indicated,
the State revised its FFY 2004 baseline data to include data not previously
reported. In addition, in the February 1, 2007 APR, the State reported that its
FFY 2005 data included monitoring data collected from all 26 early intervention
service sites.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts in achieving a high level of compliance and
looks forward to reviewing data in the FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008 that
demonstrate compliance with the requirement in 34 CFR §303.148(b)(2)(i) as
modified by IDEA section 637(a)(9).
The State revised the FFY 2004 baseline for this indicator in its SPP and OSEP
accepts that revision.
OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter required the State to include in the
February 1, 2007 APR, documentation that the State ensured the correction of
identified noncompliance, as soon as possible, but in no case later than one year
from identification, and monitoring data from all the State’s Part C programs.
In the February 1, 2007 APR, the State reported that in “FFY 2005, 93 of 97
(95.88%) findings of noncompliance identified in FFY 2004 were corrected
within one year of identification.” The State also reported that “each of the nine
Page 4
 Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Monitoring Priorities and Status OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
Indicators

findings of noncompliance identified in FFY 2003 that were not corrected within
one year of identification (FFY 2004) were corrected in FFY 2005.” In addition,
the State reported that its FFY 2005 data included monitoring data collected from
all 26 early intervention service sites.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts and looks forward to reviewing data in the
FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008, that demonstrate compliance with the
requirements in IDEA sections 616(a), 642, and 635(a)(10) and 34 CFR
§303.501(b), including data on the correction of outstanding noncompliance
related to Indicator 8 which was identified in FFY 2004. In its response to
Indicator 9 in the FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008, the State must
disaggregate by APR indicator the status of timely correction of the
noncompliance findings identified by the State during FFY 2005. In addition,
the State must, in responding to Indicators 1, 7, 8A and 8C, specifically identify
and address the noncompliance identified in this table under those indicators.

10. Percent of signed written The State reported that it did not The State did not receive any signed written complaints in FFY 2005.
complaints with reports issued receive any signed written
that were resolved within 60- complaints in FFY 2005.
day timeline or a timeline
extended for exceptional
circumstances with respect to a
particular complaint.
[Compliance Indicator]

11. Percent of fully adjudicated due The State reported that it did not The State did not receive any requests for due process hearings in FFY 2005.
process hearing requests that receive any requests for due process
were fully adjudicated within hearings in FFY 2005.
the applicable timeline.
[Compliance Indicator]

12. Percent of hearing requests that The State reported that it did not The State is not required to provide targets or improvement activities until any
went to resolution sessions that conduct any resolution meetings in FFY in which 10 or more resolution meetings were held.
were resolved through FFY 2005.
resolution session settlement
agreements (applicable if Part
B due process procedures are
FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table Page 5

Monitoring Priorities and
Indicators
adopted).
[Results Indicator; New]
13. Percent of mediations held that
resulted in mediation
agreements.
[Results Indicator]
14. State reported data (618 and
State Performance Plan and
Annual Performance Report)
are timely and accurate.
[Compliance Indicator]
FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Oklahoma Part C FFY 2005 SPP/APR Response Table
Status
The State reported that it did not
hold any mediations in FFY 2005.
The State’s FFY 2005 reported data
for this indicator are 100%. The
State met its FFY 2005 target of
100%.
OSEP Analysis/Next Steps
The State is not required to provide targets or improvement activities until any
FFY in which 10 or more mediations were conducted.
As required by OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response letter, the State revised the
targets for this indicator in its SPP to specifically indicate 100% accuracy and
100% timeliness regarding data reported to OSEP, and OSEP accepts those
revisions.
As noted above, and also requested by OSEP’s March 13, 2006 SPP response
letter, the State revised its FFY 2004 baseline data for Indicators 7, 8 and 9.
OSEP appreciates the State’s efforts in achieving compliance and looks forward
to reviewing data in the FFY 2006 APR, due February 1, 2008, that demonstrate
continuing compliance with the requirements in IDEA sections 616, 618 and
642, and 34 CFR §§303.176 and 303.540.
Page 6