Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Of all the nutrients required by the body other than oxygen, water is the most essential. Without it, all systems
would shut down. As for the quality of water, some are better than others.
Introduction
In this authors opinion, the highest energy water appears to come from steam distilled water. “Wait a second,” you
say. You’ve heard that distilled water is dead water and leeches minerals out of the body. At first glance, I’d say
you’re right. Distilled water is devoid of minerals. Why should water have minerals in it? Most minerals in water are
inorganic and not readily bioavailable, if at all. Once distilled water hits the digestive tract, it’s no longer distilled.
Theoretically, if it stayed distilled when it hit other target organs and muscles it might leech minerals, but it can’t
make that journey in its distilled form. Dr. A.F. Beddoe, Dental Surgeon and author of Biologic Ionization as applied
to Human Nutrition, states ”no other type of water is able to carry minerals into the system as easily and effectively
as distilled water.” It’s the highest energy water primarily because energy is added to it through the distillation
process. It’s similar to charging water with radiation during atomic power generation.
Discussion
Traditionally, the first water used was rain water and glacier water (both distilled). This was back in a time when
getting adequate minerals in the diet wasn’t a concern. We should be getting our minerals from our food via the soil.
Water’s lack of minerals is really secondary and not the culprit. If you think about it, the body operates under water
vapor or steam pressure, similar to distillation. Whatever is in the water can be left behind as residue. Remember,
you’re not only what you absorb, but you’re what you cannot excrete or get rid of.
At the Mladenoff Clinic, we advise all our patients about their water consumption, type of water, quantity and how it
should be used in the diet. All patients who are advised to start some type of detoxification program are asked to
bring in a sample of their tap water or any other water they may consume on a daily basis. Along with checking pH
and ppm of undissolved solids, we also run an electrical current of about 250 volts through the water. Usually, with-
in 10 minutes the water has changed dramatically, depending on the water. Crystal clear water, which has no smell,
often becomes so cloudy that you can barely see through it. Commonly, you’ll see dark soot-like sediment settle at
the bottom or top of the glass, tough, multicolored bubbles of a seemingly plastic substance that won’t disappear,
and very strong fumes which permeate the air. Every time I demonstrate this to a patient, upon smelling these fumes
(which were disguised in the water), I get a headache that quickly dissipates. Then we do the same with distilled
water, which has no reaction. Nearly all tap, bottled, most mineral and purified waters are unfit to drink, regardless
of their mineral content.
15
Conclusion
If you can find an electrical probe for testing water with a current over 200 volts, you will be astounded, and
applauded. Each time I demonstrate this to a patient, I’m reminded that there is no one to look out for us, or our
patients. We must keep an open mind, forever questioning what we know, or think we know. If your patients have a
problem with an idea whose time has come, don’t argue. Work around it. After all, treating people is all about build-
ing bridges. Educate them and give them the option of a mineral supplement. Don’t rely on water to provide your
patients with minerals.
“Faith is great, but doubt will get you an education”
Bruce Lee
References
1. Beddoe, A.F., Biologic Ionization as applied to Human Nutrition, Principles and Techniques (Oroville, WA.,
S&J Unlimited, 1994)
2. Baroody, Theodore, A., Alkalize or Die (Wayneville, NC., Eclectic Press, 1991)
Abstract
The HIV-AIDS hypothesis remains to be just that – an unproved hypothesis. For nearly two decades the war on
AIDS has been a colossal failure, with the latest AIDS statistic being “0,000,000 cured.” Much like the war on
cancer, the war on AIDS has failed to save lives, the only test that really counts.
Introduction
The number of HIV positive Americans has remained constant since HIV became detectable in 1985 – totaling about
one million people, or 0.4% of the population.1 AIDS itself has not yet affected large portions of the population, at
least not enough to be considered the epidemic that was presumed. AIDS has not yet infected large numbers of
women, nor has it entered into the heterosexual population outside of drug addicts.
Nine out of every 10 AIDS patients are still male, and more than 95% of these fall into strict risk categories of
homosexuals, heroin (IV drug) users, and in a few cases, hemophiliacs.2 In Africa, the six to eight million people
who were said to be infected for more than a decade have translated into a mere 250,000 AIDS victims, some three
to four percent of the HIV-positive people.3
Discussion
Before we get too far ahead, let’s go over HIV and why it hasn’t been proven to cause AIDS or even kill the cells it
infects. When searching for one paper that proves HIV causes AIDS, one realizes that this Black Plague of the 21st
Century is based on a hypothesis with origins no one can recall. Where are the references? Well, there aren’t any!
No one has ever proven that HIV causes AIDS. In fact there is a reward for anyone who can produce that piece of
information.
Today we know more about HIV than any other virus studied. In the more than 100,000 papers written on HIV and
AIDS since the mid 1980’s, there isn’t one paper to prove this claim.
The period of research into the causes of AIDS, in which both infectious and non-infectious agents were considered,
lasted only three years. It started with the identification of AIDS in 1981 and officially ended in April 1984 with the
announcement of the “AIDS virus” at an international press conference conducted by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services and the federal AIDS researcher Robert Gallo, in Washington D.C.4 This announcement was made
prior to the publication of any scientific evidence confirming the virus theory. With this unprecedented maneuver,
Gallo’s discovery bypassed (peer) review by the scientific community and “science by press conference” was substi-
tuted in place of the conventional process of scientific validation based on publications in the professional literature.
17
The vast amount of AIDS literature has proven HIV to be a retrovirus, also known as a passenger virus. Retroviruses
do not kill cells but grow harmoniously with them.5, 6 HIV fails to meet any of the established standards to be consid-
ered an infectious agent. These standards are called Koch Postulates:
1. KOCH’S FIRST POSTULATE:
THE MICROBE MUST BE PRESENT IN ALL CASES OF DISEASE.
In the case of AIDS, the affected tissues include the white blood cells of the immune system, particularly the T-cells,
as well as the skin lesions of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and brain neurons in dementia. But no viruses can be found in either
Kaposi’s Sarcoma or the neurons of the CNS. Since retroviruses, in fact, cannot infect nondividing cells like neu-
rons, the absence of HIV is hardly surprising. However, because Kaposi’s Sarcoma has long been synonymous with
AIDS, the absence of the virus in this cancer seriously undermines the HIV hypothesis. If HIV was actively infect-
ing T-cells or other members of the immune system, cell free virus particles, known as Virions, should easily be
found in the blood. This is the case with all classical viral diseases. Thus, HIV behaves as a harmless passenger
microbe, only coming back to life long after the immune system has been destroyed by something else and can no
longer suppress the virus.
Even those patients with some detectable virus never have more than one in every ten thousand T-cells actively pro-
ducing copies of the virus. On average, only one in every five hundred or more T-cells contain even a dormant virus.
The abundance of uninfected T-cells in all AIDS patients is the fatal, definitive argument against the many false
claims for high viral “loads” or “burdens” in AIDS patients.7
The absence of active, infectious viruses automatically disqualifies HIV as a player in the syndrome. Microbes can
only cause serious damage when infecting the host’s cells faster than the body can replace them; T-cells, the pre-
sumed target of HIV, are constantly regenerating at much, much higher rates than dormant HIV in the presence of
anti-viral immunity.8
HIV is not, of course, behaving differently from other viruses. Upon infecting a new host, a typical virus invades its
target cells and begins replicating in large numbers, producing new virus particles that spill into the bloodstream and
infect more cells; this is the period in which high levels of virus can be isolated from the patient and the symptoms
are the strongest. HIV, like other retroviruses, can achieve high levels of virus when first infecting the body (up to
100,000 particles per millimeter of blood), but in most people the anti-bodies activated against it then permanently
inactivate HIV. During this brief period of HIV activity, some newly infected people have reported mild flu-like
symptoms at most, but no AIDS diseases. But all of these rare cases were male homosexuals from high-risk groups,
meaning people who used recreational drugs that can cause exactly those same symptoms.
Outside this risk group are the 17 million HIV-positive healthy people identified by the World Health Organization9
who cannot connect any past disease with HIV infection. They are either surprised or shocked to find out they are
HIV-positive or are blissfully unaware of it. The reason is that HIV is one of the many harmless passenger viruses
that cause no clinical symptoms during the acute infection. By contrast, most people have lasting memories of their
mumps, measles, hepatitis, polio, chicken pox, and flus, after which they become “antibody-positive” for the respec-
tive virus.
Not all AIDS patients carry even dormant HIV. Antibody-positive patients usually do have some latent virus left over
from past infection. HIV has never infected many people dying of AIDS-like conditions in the first place.
According to the CDC’s own statistics, at least 25% of all AIDS cases have never been tested for HIV antibodies,
many of whom might be negative. Further, the HIV test itself often generates false-positive results, particularly in
members of AIDS risk groups who have been infected with large numbers of interfering viruses.10 Thorough follow-
up testing could reveal HIV-negative cases in the official AIDS tally. The scientific literature describes some 4,621
confirmed cases of HIV-free people dying of AIDS diseases, including homosexuals and heroin addicts in the U.S.,
Europe and central Africans. But because the CDC ignores virtually all HIV-negative patients, counting only those
with the virus as AIDS cases, the total number of such cases may never be known.
Table 2: Drug use by homosexuals with AIDS and at risk for AIDS
Note: Not one of these studies reported a drug-free man with AIDS or at risk for AIDS
There is considerable evidence which strongly supports a connection between nitrate use, other recreational drugs,
and AIDS. The leading candidates are nitrites, which are commonly inhaled to intensify orgasm.30 The carcinogenic
and immunotoxic effects of nitrate inhalants are well documented.31 In 1983, two dozen of America’s leading AIDS
investigators, including CDC worker Harold Jaffe, later director of the CDC’s HIV/AIDS Division, had conducted
extensive epidemiological studies which revealed overwhelming drug use, including antibiotics, cocaine and amphet-
amines by all homosexual AIDS patients studied.32 Government statistics and independent publications continue to
confirm that one-third of the American, and over one-third of the European AIDS patients are intravenous drug users
of cocaine, heroin and other drugs.18, 33, 34 Virtually all of the female and heterosexual male AIDS patients are intra-
venous drug users.28, 35, 36 98% of nitrite inhalant users are homosexual.37, 38 Cocaine, amphetamines and heroin are
indirectly toxic. All three function as catalysts, causing neurotoxic reactions.39 Weight loss, malnutrition, and insom-
nia are consequences of drug-induced suppression of appetite and fatigue.40, 41, 42 Malnutrition is the world’s leading
cause of immune deficiency.43 T-cell counts stabilize in drug users after they stop injecting intravenous drugs.44
AZT — Aids By Prescription
There are currently over two hundred thousand HIV positive people, including many with AIDS, who are prescribed
AZT, ddi, ddc, or some other DNA chain terminator, as well as other experimental anti-HIV drugs. Since 1986 the
AIDS establishment has spent billions of dollars to bring these drugs into human bodies, but it has yet to fund the
first study to test the health hazards of these drugs in animals. No animal tests — just human experiments.
AZT was shelved some thirty years ago as a failed therapy for cancer. AZT blocks DNA production, not only in
human T-cells or retroviruses, but also in any bacteria that might exist in the body. In this way it can act as an indis-
criminate antibiotic, killing opportunistic infections while destroying the immune system targeting bone marrow. A
Conclusion
What needs to be done? Being a primary health care provider means educating our patients and colleagues, and
especially anyone who is presumed to be HIV positive or taking any one of the toxic drugs given to these patients.
HIV must be looked at honestly with open eyes, and peoples’ lives should be re-evaluated in respect to their health
needs. This does not mean that health education about the transmission or treatment of sexually transmitted diseases
should be neglected. Diseases such as syphilis and gonorrhea can cause death and serious disability and should be
treated appropriately. Needless to say, there will be much debate among professionals, and surely patients, on this
subject. Just remember the truth was never hurt by honest debate. Hundreds of thousands of lives are riding on it.
“You teach, you teach, you teach.”
–last words of Weston A. Price
References
1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIAID Backgrounder: How HIV causes AIDS (National
Institute of Health, 1994).
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “U.S. HIV and AIDS Reported through December 1993; Year End
Edition,” HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 5(1993):I-33.
3. Duesberg, “Aids Acquired by Drug Consumption,” 201-277; P.H. Duesberg “Human Immunodeficiency Virus
and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Correlation but not Causation,” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 86 (1989): 755-764.
4. L. K. Altman, “Researchers Believe AIDS Virus Found,” New York Times, 24 April 1984, c1, c3.
5. Blattner, H., et al, Neurology 44, p. 1892-1900 (1994).
6. Duesberg, P. H., Science ZH, p. 514-516 (1988).