You are on page 1of 9

ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS. POWER SYSTEMS, APRIL 2011.

1

Large-scale Solar PV Investment Models, Tools and Analysis: The Ontario Case
Wajid Muneer, Student Member, IEEE, Kankar Bhattacharya, Senior Member, IEEE, and Claudio Caรฑizares, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract โ€“ In this paper, an optimization model and techniques to facilitate a prospective investor to arrive at an optimal plan for investment in large-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) generation projects are proposed and discussed. The optimal set of decisions includes the location, sizing and time of investment that yields the highest profit. The mathematical model considers various relevant issues associated with PV projects such as locationspecific solar radiation levels, detailed investment costs representation, and an approximate representation of the transmission system. A detailed case study considering the investment in PV projects in Ontario, Canada, is presented and discussed, demonstrating the practical application and usefulness of the proposed methodology and tools. Index Terms โ€“ Power system planning, renewable energy generation, solar photovoltaic, investment tools. ๐ท๐ต

๐‘ ๐ฟ ๐ด ๐ผ๐‘– ๐‘‡๐‘– ๐œ‚๐‘– ๐œ‚๐‘œ ๐œ‚๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐‘›๐‘‘,๐‘š ๐‘›๐‘š

I. NOMENCLATURE A. Indices Zone ๐‘–, ๐‘— Year ๐‘˜

This work is supported by the Ontario Centers of Excellence project โ€œLarge-scale Photovoltaic Solar Power Integration in Transmission and Distribution Networksโ€ (PV-SOPITAD), in collaboration with Hydro One Networks, London Hydro, Blue Water Power Generation, OptiSolar, First Solar and the University of Western Ontario. The authors are with the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. (e-mail: wmuneer@uwaterloo.ca, kankar@uwaterloo.ca, ccanizares@uwaterloo.ca).

B. Parameters Discount rate [%] ๐‘Ž ๐ธ๐ถ๐‘˜,๐‘– Equipment cost [$/kW] ๐ฟ๐ถ๐‘˜,๐‘– Land cost [$/kW] ๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘˜,๐‘– Transport cost [$/kW] ๐ฟ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜,๐‘– Labor cost [$/kW] ๐‘‚๐‘€๐‘˜,๐‘– Operation and maintenance cost [$/kWh] ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ Solar PV capacity factor [%] ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ Conventional generation capacity factor [%] ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜,๐‘– Conventional generation capacity available [MW] ๐‘’๐‘“๐‘“ ๐‘ƒ๐ท๐‘˜,๐‘– Effective zonal peak demand [MW] ๐‘€๐ด๐‘‹ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜,๐‘–๐‘— Transmission line capacity [MW] ๐ต๐‘˜,๐‘–๐‘— Element of B-matrix [p.u.] Price of energy sold to grid/utility [$/kWh] ๐œŒ ๐ด๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘๐‘˜ Annual budget [$] ๐‘‡๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘ Total budget [$] ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘œ๐‘–,๐‘š Monthly average power from solar PV module [kW] Rated power of a typical solar PV module [kW] ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰

C. Variables Net present value of investor profit [$] ๐›บ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜,๐‘– New solar PV capacity [MW] ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜,๐‘– Total solar PV capacity [MW] ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜,๐‘–๐‘— Transmission line power flow [MW] ๐›ฟ๐‘˜,๐‘– Zone power angle [rad] ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜,๐‘– Power dispatched from conventional generation [MW] ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜,๐‘– Power dispatched from solar PV generation [MW] ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐ธ๐‘˜,๐‘– Energy available from conventional generation [MWh] ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ธ๐‘˜,๐‘– Energy available from solar PV generation [MWh] II. INTRODUCTION HE depleting oil reserves, uncertainty and political issues concerning nuclear generation, combined with the environmental concerns associated with coal and natural gasfired generation, is encouraging researchers, practitioners and policy makers to look for alternative and sustainable sources of energy. Among them, wind and solar generation have become preeminent in recent years. In this context, the ease of installation, declining cost of technology and supportive government policies have been the catalysts for the fast growth of solar photo-voltaic (PV) generation in the world. Thus, in just a short duration of 6 years, from 2004 to 2009, the total global grid-connected solar PV capacity has increased at an average rate of 60%, annually, to a total of about 21 GW [1]. As of 2009, in the province of Ontario, Canada, out of a total renewable energy generation capacity of 1,422 MW, solar PV generation capacity accounts for 525 MW [2]. The current worldโ€™s largest solar PV power plant with an installed capacity of 80 MW was completed in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, in October 2010 [3]. Grid-connected solar PV systems provide a quiet, low maintenance, pollution-free, safe, reliable and independent alternative to conventional generation sources. Major

Dead-band imposed on initial investment [years] Investment period [years] Plant useful life [years] Solar PV module area [m2] Zonal solar radiation in zone [kWh/m2-day] Zonal ambient temperature [ยฐC] Solar PV system conversion efficiency [%] Solar PV module efficiency [%] Inverter efficiency [%] Number of daylight hours available per month [hrs] Number of hours per month [hrs]

T

It also concludes that the break-even point occurs at high . as discussed in [9]. Generally. and the project with the highest NPV is selected. thus representing somewhat system security issues. allows the highest rates to investments in solar PV systems up to 10 MW [6]. hydro power and solar PV. In [10]. power angle constraints and power flow equations in the planning framework.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS. the traditional centralized planning aspects such as minimization of overall system losses and overall system security are not considered here. Finally. biogas. Section IV presents the proposed investor-centric generation planning model to determine the optimal investment decisions in solar PV. annualized life-cycle cost (ALCC) or cost annuity. There has been some reported works in the literature on system-wide analysis. However. development of decision making tools for a solar PV investor. Thus. Section V discusses the Ontario case study. not concerned with system-wide operation or planning are not generally available in the current technical literature. Ontarioโ€™s Feed-in Tariff (FIT) was established as North Americaโ€™s first comprehensive guaranteed pricing structure for renewable energy production. It was concluded in [10] that solar PV systems become much more economically competitive with conventional generation sources when they are installed on a large-scale. Cost comparisons reveal that PV systems have the lowest cost when the daily energy demand is low. solar PV is expected to reach grid parity in most of Europe by 2019 [4]. The model is demonstrated in the case of a prospective investor in Ontarioโ€™s booming green energy sector. planning and operational effects of distributed generation (DG) on power systems. payback period (PBP). this model can be considered as the first stage of a two stage planning framework for a decentralized power system. solar PV and conventional generation capacity factors. the main conclusions and contributions of the paper are highlighted in Section VII. The structure of the rest of this paper is as follows: Section III provides a brief background review of the relevant economic criteria and technical literature.[13]-[15]. In an attempt to attract investments in renewable energy and help phase-out coal generation in Ontario by 2014 to meet emission reduction targets. driven by various incentives and support policy mechanisms offered by governments. This is in line with the current investment trends in power systems with the influx of private investments. Therefore. which includes development of cost components. Therefore. From a literature review. with the results meant to aid private investors in their decision making. NPV is the discounted sum of the revenue from selling the gross generated energy net of all costs associated with the energy delivery system. demand. the analysis and mitigation of the adverse effects of solar PV sources on the utility grid is discussed in [7] and [8]. 2 breakthroughs in solar cell manufacturing technologies have enabled it to compete with conventional generation technologies in the large-scale as well. Least cost energy is a reasonable criterion. NPVs are calculated for all the proposed projects. the transmission system model. ALCC is the average yearly flow of money. landfill gas. PBP is a nonlife cycle criteria and simply calculates the time needed to recover the investment made. an LCC analysis using a cost annuity method is applied. on-shore and off-shore wind. the Green Energy and Green Economy Act of Ontario was passed in May 2009 [5]. Unlike certain conventional generation sources that have substantial operational costs such as thermal units. and evaluation of solar PV capacity factors. making the results viable from a systemsโ€™ point of view. According to the European PV Technology Platform Group. Hence. this paper focuses on developing optimal plan decision tools for solar PV investments from the perspective of investors. therefore. It also stimulates the development of new tools and techniques to determine optimal paths of integration of renewable energy resources into the existing power system. For example. the viability of solar PV systems is examined and a sensitivity analysis is carried out to estimate their comparative viability with conventional diesel-powered units based on region specific parameters. The proposed and general mathematical model considers the future generation. ROI is the market discount rate that results in zero NPV. and return on investment (ROI). carefully evaluated with adequate accuracy for a planning problem of this nature. However. in the prevalent decentralized power systems. the model presented here does incorporate transmission constraints. transmission parameters. but it is only useful when solar energy is the only available resource. BACKGROUND Solar PV systems are generally characterized by high fixed costs and low operation costs [11]. security or reliability. The FIT offers lucrative prices under long-term contracts for energy generated from biomass. The FIT price schedule for larger projects. which cannot be ignored in their investment planning programs. solar PV investment planning models are not significantly affected by their operating costs. but the sum over the period can be converted to a series of equal payments. the focus of this work is restricted to large-scale solar PV systems (5 MW and above). The following economic criteria have been proposed in the literature for the evaluation of solar PV investments [12]: least cost energy. net present value (NPV) or life-cycle cost (LCC). In Section VI the results obtained from the Ontario case model are presented and analyzed. III. including a probabilistic study to consider relevant parameter uncertainties. it can be observed that the most appropriate economic criteria for solar PV investment analysis is the NPV analysis [9]. private investors do not own or operate the transmission network and are hence not solely responsible for its performance. as it incorporates the entire life-cycle of the projects and the time value of money. It is important to highlight the fact that the primary purpose of this paper is to present an investor-oriented solar PV planning model. POWER SYSTEMS.[10]. APRIL 2011. This program opens up opportunities for new investments in the renewable energy sector in Ontario. the actual flow varies with year.

๐‘– + ๐ฟ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. 6) Dynamic Constraint on Solar PV Capacity Addition: This constraint ensures that the solar PV capacity for the next year is the cumulative sum of the new capacity installed and the capacity of the previous year. ๐ท๐ต (13) .๐‘– denotes the total annualized project cost in year ๐‘˜ and zone ๐‘–. This cumulative sum is taken only for the investment period as follows: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜+1.๐‘– โ‰ค ๐›ฟ๐‘š๐‘Ž๐‘ฅ (7) 2) Line Flow Limits: The power transferred between the zones depends on the impedance of the transmission lines.๐‘– = ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜. the annual revenue generated by new investments is ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ calculated based on the amount of energy ๐ธ๐‘˜.๐‘–๐‘— ๏ฟฝ๐›ฟ๐‘˜.๐‘– ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ (8) ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐ธ๐‘˜. tariff structure and grid interconnection policy of the region.๐‘– โ‰ค 8760 ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS.๐‘– (11) 4) Energy Generation From Conventional Sources: Zonal capacity factors of conventional generation ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ can be evaluated using the systemโ€™s historical data of generator outputs and available capacity. thereby implying that there are no new investments beyond year ๐‘. This transfer must not exceed the maximum power transfer limit of each of the transmission lines.๐‘– is constrained as follows: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ธ๐‘˜.๐‘– ๏ฟฝ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. It is concluded that government incentives such as FIT are necessary to attract investments in solar PV. while the investment selection variables are binary. MATHEMATICAL MODEL In this section the proposed optimization model. It also includes operation and maintenance cost ๐‘‚๐‘€๐‘˜.๐‘– ๐ธ๐‘˜. In (1). All variables and parameters throughout this section are properly defined in Section I. Thus.๐‘– .๐‘– .๐‘– + ๏ฟฝ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. APRIL 2011. This results in a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model that was solved in GAMS using the CPLEX solver [16].๐‘–๐‘— = 0 ๐‘’๐‘“๐‘“ ๐‘— (4) 3) Power Angle Limits: The power angles are constrained to be within a range to ensure system stability (ยฑ30ยฐ limits were used here): ๐›ฟ๐‘š๐‘–๐‘› โ‰ค ๐›ฟ๐‘˜.๐‘–๐‘— (6) where.๐‘– + ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. the following constraint is included to account for budgeting delays.๐‘– = 8760 ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. The proposed optimization model is linear and most of the decision variables are continuous. ๐ถ๐‘œ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘˜. which includes annualized values of equipment cost ๐ธ๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘– is discrete with 5 MW steps. as discussed in the next section for the case of Ontario [12]. a coordination scheme for approval of DG investment proposals is presented. as follows: โˆ‘๐‘–๏ฟฝ๐‘…๐‘’๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ข๐‘’๐‘˜. in [9].๐‘– = ๐œŒ๐ธ๐‘˜. (๐‘ โˆ’ 1) 5) Energy Generation From Solar PV Sources: Zonal capacity factors of solar PV generation ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ can be determined from solar energy data.๐‘– โˆ’ ๐ถ๐‘œ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘˜.๐‘– + ๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘˜. land cost ๐ฟ๐ถ๐‘˜. Based on these capacity factors the annual energy available from the solar PV ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ generation sources ๐ธ๐‘˜. are presented and discussed in detail.๐‘– + ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. IV. Constraints 1) Demand-supply Balance: The effective power demand of each zone is met by existing conventional generation and new solar PV generation while considering the transmission network representation through the following dc power flow model: ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. Objective Function The objective is to maximize the NPV of the investorโ€™s profit (๐›บ).๐‘– associated with new investments ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. given the cost parameters.๐‘– (2) ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ + ๐‘‚๐‘€๐‘˜.๐‘– (3) The aforementioned cost components and revenue stream are annualized considering the total plant life ๐ฟ. policy changes and other similar temporary effects (๐ท๐ต was assumed here to be 2 years): ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜.๐‘– = 0 โˆ€ ๐‘˜ = 1.๐‘– = 8760 ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜.๐‘– = ๏ฟฝ๐ธ๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘– โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐‘˜. Based on the annual cash flow over the useful life of the new investments. A simple PBP and LCC analysis of NPV is carried out.๐‘– and ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ labor cost ๐ฟ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. โ€ฆ . the annual energy available from conventional ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ generation sources ๐ธ๐‘˜. POWER SYSTEMS.๐‘– ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ Note that the variable ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘–๐‘— = โˆ’๐ต๐‘˜. Based on these capacity factors. This scheme relies on an iterative process satisfying both the objective of the LDC (maximizing DG participation and penetration) and the SPP (maximizing profit based on sizing. transportation/freight cost ๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘– + ๐ฟ๐ถ๐‘˜. siting and production schedule). including the objective function and constraints. Finally. thus: (5) ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜.๐‘– ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ (10) ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ธ๐‘˜.๐‘– โˆ’ ๐‘ƒ๐ท๐‘˜.๐‘– . Thus: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘œ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘˜.๐‘– is constrained as follows: ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ ๐ธ๐‘˜.๐‘–๐‘— โ‰ค ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. thus: 7) Constraint on Initial Year Investment: This constraint ensures that there are no investments made during the first few years. โ€ฆ .๐‘– ๏ฟฝ ๐‘€๐‘Ž๐‘ฅ๐‘–๐‘š๐‘–๐‘ง๐‘’ ๐›บ = ๏ฟฝ (1) (1 + ๐‘Ž)๐‘˜ ๐‘˜ B. carbon taxes and cap-and-trade on renewable energy investments by small power producers (SPPs) and/or local distribution company (LDC) are presented in [15].๐‘– โ‰ค 8760 ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜.๐‘– (9) 8) Constraint on Terminal Year Investment: The solar PV capacity remains unchanged beyond the plan period. Long-term effects of FIT. ๐›บ is calculated for a discount rate ๐‘Ž.๐‘— ๏ฟฝ ๐‘€๐ด๐‘‹ ๐‘ƒ๐‘˜. 3 energy demand. 2. 2.๐‘– (12) โˆ€ ๐‘˜ = 1.๐‘– associated with inverter replacements and periodic maintenance checks.๐‘– injected into the grid and the negotiated contract price ๐œŒ: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘…๐‘’๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ข๐‘’๐‘˜. A. as the cost of solar PV systems decrease and diesel cost increases. A technical and economic assessment of utility interactive solar PV systems for South East Queensland is reported in [14]. and that either a carbon tax or cap-and-trade mechanism to the FIT would result in reduction of both emissions and energy cost.

and is independent of the zone in which the plant is installed.31 East Ottawa Essa NE 4. the power output from the solar PV module is given as: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘œ๐‘–. based on the trend over the last 10 years.๐‘– ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. 2. The monthly solar radiation ๐ผ๐‘– and ambient temperature ๐‘‡๐‘– can thus be obtained and used to find the system conversion efficiency ๐œ‚๐‘– .๐‘š ๐‘›๐‘‘.42 100. 2) Land Cost: This cost reflects the cost of land required for the installation.73 3.๐‘– ๐ธ๐‘˜. and labor cost [19].๐‘– = ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜+๐ฟ. Capital cost components for the year 2010. These costs are dependent on a variety of parameters. The effect of technology change and the consequent expected reduction in module and inverter costs over the next 30 years [20].000 2010 โ€“ 2018 (14) Net Inflation Rate [%] Annual Budget.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS.๐‘– โˆ€ ๐‘˜ = ๐‘ NW Annual Maintenance Cost. ๐ฟ [years] Discount Rate. as discussed next.95 2.01 8 4 25 0. 1) Equipment Cost: This cost reflects the cost of modules.๐‘– ๏ฟฝ โ‰ค ๐‘‡๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘ Land Cost Labor Cost Transport Cost (17) Fig.000. The energy produced is determined based on the number of daylight hours available [18]. 3) Transportation Cost: This cost ๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘˜. the increase in land prices observed from 2005-2009 was extrapolated to obtain the land cost trends in the future [22].27 9) Decommissioning of Solar PV Units: After a useful life of ๐ฟ years. hence: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜+๐ฟ+1. which are associated with the โ€œdominantโ€ type of land in each zone. APRIL 2011. ONTARIO CASE STUDY PARAMETERS A. land cost.90 ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜. each solar PV installation is considered to be phased out of operation (๐ฟ is assumed here to be 25 years).24 3. V.๐‘– [$/kWh] Item TABLE III REMAINING INPUT PARAMETERS Value 0.๐‘– ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘– was determined using proportional land market prices [21]. Solar PV Power Model + ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘‚๐‘€๐‘˜.44 5. The per unit equipment cost ๐ธ๐ถ๐‘˜. ๐‘‡๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘ [$] Energy Price. ๐‘‚๐‘€๐‘˜. ๐ด๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘ [$/year] Investment Period. The per unit land cost ๐ฟ๐ถ๐‘˜. the capacity factors are evaluated using the rating of the solar PV module as follows: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ โˆ‘๐‘š๏ฟฝ๐‘ƒ๐‘œ๐‘–. inverters and balance of system. (๐‘ โˆ’ 1) ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๏ฟฝ ๐ถ๐ถ๐‘˜. Also.๐‘– (15) โˆ€ ๐‘˜ = 1. transportation cost. TABLE I PERCENTAGE ANNUAL GROWTH RATES FOR ZONAL LABOR COSTS IN ONTARIO FROM 2010 ONWARDS Annual Annual Zone Growth Rate Zone Growth Rate [%] [%] Bruce West SW Niagara Toronto ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜+1. Therefore.8 Land Cost 2. hence: ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ ๏ฟฝ ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ถ๐ถ๐‘˜.๐‘– ๐‘˜ ๐‘– Zonal solar PV capacity factors ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ can be evaluated based on zonal solar radiation and zonal ambient temperature data as discussed in the next section.๐‘– โˆ’ ๐‘๐ถ๐‘˜. ๐น๐ผ๐‘‡ [$/kWh] Useful Life.๐‘– โ‰ค ๐ด๐ต๐‘ข๐‘‘๐‘˜ ๐‘– โ‰ค 0. 1.๐‘– 4 TABLE II ANNUAL GROWTH RATES FOR COST COMPONENTS Module Cost Annual Growth Rate [%] -1 Inverter Cost -0. ๐‘Ž [%] $/kW 10) Annual Budget Limit: This constraint ensures that the annual cost of new solar PV installations is constrained by an annual budget limit (a limit of $100 M was assumed here).67 2.๐‘š = ๐ด ๐ผ๐‘– ๐œ‚๐‘– (19) Equations (18) and (19) can be used to evaluate the energy available per unit area per month for a particular type of solar module [17]. was also taken into consideration here. POWER SYSTEMS.๐‘– is determined based on the number of modules and inverters required per unit of power produced. thus: (16) 600 400 200 0 Bruce SW Ottawa Essa Niagara Toronto West East NW NE 11) Total Budget Limit: This constraint ensures that the total cost of new solar PV installations over the entire plan period is constrained by a total budget limit (a limit of $500 M was assumed here).000 500.๐‘š ๏ฟฝ (20) ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ = ๐‘ƒ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ƒ๐‘‰ โˆ‘๐‘š ๐‘›๐‘š C.000.37 2.8 3. given by [8]: ๐ผ๐‘– (18) ๐œ‚๐‘– = ๏ฟฝ1 โˆ’ 0.56 Transportation Cost 2.๐‘– reflects the cost of .49 1. โ€ฆ . Cost Model Parameters The cost of installing a solar PV power plant can be split into four main components: the equipment cost.0042 ๏ฟฝ + ๐‘‡๐‘– โˆ’ 20๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ ๐œ‚๐‘œ ๐œ‚๐‘–๐‘›๐‘ฃ 18 Consequently. ๐‘ [years] Total Budget.

as shown in Fig. 4. The model developed Fig. The annual maintenance cost associated with periodic check-up and repair of modules and inverter replacements were also considered [28].8 1.17 NE 1162. as depicted in Fig.91 0. POWER SYSTEMS. In this work. Thus. The actual cost components obtained for 2010 are shown in Fig.43 0.42 Essa 906. Zonal generation plan in Ontario. Percentage distribution of solar PV capital cost in Bruce in 2010. along with other parameters considered in this work.78 West 1656. TABLE IV DEMAND FORECAST BASIS [30] Bruce Effective Peak Demand in 2009 [MW] Demand Growth Rate [%] 57.28 Niagara 513.51 0. is the most significant. Future cost components were also forecasted using a variety of reliable resources [20]-[27]. The generation forecast in this figure was obtained by combining the information presented in [30] and [31] to give the generation capability contributing to the peak load rather than just the base load. and is shown in Table I. and information provided by the OPA and IESO. the model is estimated from information available from various resources [29]-[32]. Observe that the equipment cost component. In this work. [24].29% SW 2853. In addition to the distances from the supply centers to the zones. Ontario 10-zone power system model.71 Ottawa 1219. 3.08% Equipment Cost Land Cost Labor Cost Transport Cost Fig. 1. which is independent of location.33 NW 478. represents the system in a detail that is adequate for planning studies. 5) Total Capital Cost: The solar PV cost model developed realistically reflects the trends in these components in different zones in Ontario. a ten zone equivalent model for Ontarioโ€™s transmission network has been used. Ontario Power System Model In this work. transporting the equipment from the supply center (assumed to be Toronto here) to the construction site. The IESO also considers this model to forecast and assess the reliability of existing and committed resources and transmission facilities in the Ontario electricity market [29]. followed by Niagara and Toronto with 2% each.41 Toronto 5473. Because of lack of sufficient data from 2025 onwards.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS.98% 0. after calculating the number of labor required per unit capacity of solar PV plant [27].44 1. the mode of transportation is considered to be trucking.14 3. B. the transportation cost also depends on the unit cost of freight [23]. 2. According to the Integrated Power System Plan (IPSP) of Ontario [32]. 4. 3. Bruce has the highest growth rate of 3%. The generation growth Ottawa Essa NW Niagara NE SW East Bruce West Toronto . as shown in Table III. and are presented in Table II.7 1. and the weight of the equipment [17]. approximate zonal generation growth rates were assumed based on historical data. Generation Capacity [MW] Fig.1 5 87. The increase in the median income was forecasted based on the census data of Ontario for the period from 2000 to 2005 [26]. followed by the cost of land and labor. 1) Generation Capability: The proposed planning model requires inputs on zonal generation availability for the future.64 0.44 -0. Figure 2 shows the respective percentage distribution for Zone 1 (Bruce). transportation costs are only a fraction of the total capital cost.49 0.12 1. APRIL 2011. a generation forecast of each zone was obtained for the period 2008-2025. 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 4) Labor Cost: This cost reflects the cost of labor at each zone and is determined using the median income of the zone [26].77 East 935. The increase in trucking costs in Ontario [25] since 2003 was considered and used to determine future transportation costs.65% 8.

Zonal solar PV capacity factors. 5. Using the zonal demand forecast from 2007-2015 provided by the IESO. 7. comprising 500 kV and 230 kV lines.5% 26. TABLE V PLANNED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS [30] Current Planned Year Corridor MW MW 2012 Bruce โ€“ Southwest 2560 4560 2012 2013 2015 2017 2017 Southwest โ€“ Toronto Northeast โ€“ Northwest Bruce โ€“ West Toronto โ€“ Essa Essa โ€“ Northeast 3212 350 1940 2000 1900 5212 550 2440 2500 2400 6 New Capacity Investments [MW] 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Solar PV Energy Annual Energy from Solar PV sources [GWh] 350 Bruce West SW Niagara Toronto East Ottawa Essa NE Fig. generation and demand changes 2010-2018. 2) Effective Peak Demand: The proposed model also requires information on zonal peak demand forecasts. 8. The transmission line capacities so evaluated define the line flow limits. Transmission line flows. New capacity investments in Ontario.5% SW Ottawa Essa Niagara Toronto Bruce West East NW NE Annual Energy from Conventional Sources [GWh] 135000 134500 134000 133500 133000 132500 132000 131500 Fig.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS.5% 25. POWER SYSTEMS. line parameters are evaluated from 2008 to 2038 based on the typical values of transmission lines at these voltage levels [34]. 9. with lower voltage lines being neglected. 25 Energy (kWh) 20 15 10 5 0 March May February September October April January June July November August December Bruce West SW Niagara Toronto East Ottawa Essa NE NW Bruce West SW Niagara Toronto East Ottawa Essa NE NW Fig. the conservation and demand management plans presented in Ontarioโ€™s IPSP are also considered and the corresponding reduced peak demand is estimated.5% 27. whereas the rest of the zones are not expected to show considerable growth. Energy from solar PV and conventional sources. zonal demand growth rates are obtained (see Table IV). transmission line capacities and line loading limits are also considered.0% 25. [17]. 6. In this work. rate for Essa and Northeast was considered to be 1%. The approximate distances between zones. the energy produced per month per solar PV module per zone was computed as discussed in Section IV-C. Fig. Zonal capacity factors for conventional generation ๐ถ๐น๐‘–๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘ฃ were evaluated based on two months worth of data from the IESO [33]. APRIL 2011. C.0% 26.0% 24. Zonal Solar PV Capacity Factors In Ontario For a typical 140 W solar module of 15% efficiency and dc to ac conversion efficiency of 85% [8]. Solar PV monthly energy yield. based on solar radiation and ambient temperature data provided in NASAโ€™s 3) Transmission Lines: The simplified transmission system model considered in this work represents Ontarioโ€™s transmission network. Conventional Energy Fig. Annualized Capacity Factors 28. as well as the transmission capacity enhancements planned by the OPA (see Table V). The transmission NW .0% 27.

Surface meteorology and Solar Energy (SSE) database [35]. negotiated contract price and solar PV investment costs. a Monte Carlo simulation approach can be used to determine the expected investment plans and associated decisions. Note that the tie-line linking Zone 1 to Zone 3 is the most affected transmission corridor. 11. Probabilistic Case Study In order to account for the uncertainty in various model parameters. conventional energy sources continue to serve the largest share of the demand. New capacity decision frequency. effective demand and the transmission system have an indirect effect. arising from solar PV investments.2 1. 10. are selected for the Bruce region (Zone 1) over the first four years of the plan period.00% 1. New Capacity Selection Frequency [%] 4. B. 7 which indicates that Zone 1 โ€œBruceโ€ is the ideal zone to invest in solar PV to yield the maximum returns. The NPV of all projects selected for investment is $725 million. this analysis yielded the results depicted in Fig. Four investment projects of sizes 3 x 35 MW + 30 MW respectively. Observe that although the Fig. Of the parameters directly influencing the NPV. solar PV capacity factors. and is shown in Fig. Fig. as per Ontarioโ€™s FIT program. 7 Average Cumulative NPV [$bn] 1. generation and demand over the investment period 2010-2018. was solved using the CPLEX solver in GAMS with a 0. Figure 8 shows the changes in transmission line flows.00% Bruce West SW Niagara Toronto East Ottawa Essa NW 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Fig. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS The proposed solar PV investment model.1 1.95 0. Both the results of deterministic and probabilistic (to consider parameter uncertainties) analyses are shown and discussed next. demand and generation capacity along with future expansions plans were carefully accounted for and hence are not expected to differ NE Expected annual energy from solar PV sources [GWh] 134500 500 . the solar PV investment costs were evaluated based on historical data and are hence expected to steadily maintain their trends in the future. 12. which represents an annual ROI on investments of 37% (note that the current best average annual rate of return in emerging markets is about 10%). which is an MILP model. the budget limits are considered to be at the discretion of the investor. 13. 6.1% optimality gap tolerance. The Monte Carlo simulation approach is based on the assumption that the uncertain parameters have an associated probability distribution function.00% 2.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS. Histogram and probability distribution function of NPV. VI. which can be attributed to the 135 MW of new solar PV capacity being commissioned in Zone 1.15 1. APRIL 2011. The zonal solar PV capacity factors are obtained considering the total energy produced and the number of daylight hours as per (20). A. conventional generation capacity. are. Cumulative average of NPV in $bn from 2000 iterations.05 1 0. budget limits. the contribution of solar energy increases during the investment period and attains a steady-state share after 2013.00% 3. On the other hand. Deterministic Case Study The deterministic optimal investment plan for solar PV projects in Ontario is shown in Fig.9 1 85 169 253 337 421 505 589 673 757 841 925 1009 1093 1177 1261 1345 1429 1513 1597 1681 1765 1849 1933 134000 133500 133000 132500 132000 131500 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 400 300 200 100 0 Number of iterations Conventional Energy Solar PV Energy Fig. discount rate.00% 0. and the negotiated contract price can be assumed to remain constant over the entire useful life of the project. 5. The energy injected into the system annually during the plan period from new solar PV units is compared with that from conventional sources in Fig.25 Expected annual energy from conventional sources [GWh] 1. The existing transmission system. 9. POWER SYSTEMS. Energy from solar PV and conventional sources. The main parameters that may most directly influence the NPV and the associated investment decisions. besides the increase of over 800 MW conventional generation and a slight decrease in demand.

Available: http://www. [Online]. Koutroulis.โ€ Solarbuzz. Bhattacharya and J. to repeal the Energy Conservation Leadership Act.โ€ Time and Date AS. Aug 2010. M. [Online]. S.ca/start-debut-eng.โ€ IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.1375-1383. โ€œLong-Term Effects of Feed-in Tariffs and Carbon Taxes on Distribution Systems. and E. Observe in Fig.1241-1253. no. Available: http://www. Chapter 12 Statutes of Ontario.com/files/36cell1. 2009.ca/en/Products/Property/FLV/Fall2010/index.php [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [2] [3] .org/ted. โ€œSolar Module Retail Price Environment.ca/fichier/80674/Photovoltaic%20Systems%20%20Buyer's%20Guide. โ€œGrid parity: holy grail or hype?.pvresources. โ€œAn Act to enact the Green Energy Act.โ€ Transport Canada.pdf greatly from their assumed values over the investment horizon considered here. Paatero.ca/eng/policy/report-acgoperatingcost2005-2005-e-1737. 4. no.pdf โ€œPowerGate Plus 500 kW PV Inverter Data Sheet. [Online]. 10. Available: http://www. K. D. Bill 150.pdf J.henrygeorge. Sinke. which is significantly higher than the values obtained from the deterministic analysis. Available: http://www.pdf B. M.gc. 12 is somewhat higher than that obtained for the deterministic case. The zonal solar PV capacity factors are assumed to be normally distributed around their base values. 1544-1550. [Online].pdf โ€œA Progress Report on Electricity Supply Third Quarter 2009. โ€œStandard Polycrystalline Module Product Sheet.tc. pp.gc. 2.htm โ€œEstimating Land Market Values. M.โ€ Transport Canada. Beckman.3.nrcanrncan. The average cumulative NPV of the investment plan is plotted over 2000 iterations of Monte Carlo simulations in Fig. pp. even though zonal solar PV capacity factors were evaluated based on 22 years of historical data. Fuller. pp. CONCLUSIONS In this paper.satcon. 2000 IEEE Power and Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Available: http://www. 2002. K. VII. โ€œCoordination of Investor-Owned DG Capacity Growth in Distribution Systems. D.โ€ International Energy Agency. the Bruce region (Zone 1) has the comparatively highest likelihood of investment. resulting in a lognormal distribution (ฯƒ=0. August 2008.3.โ€ PVresources.asp#on โ€œEstimates of the Full Cost of Transportation in Canada. for example. 2010. J. The expected energy injected from new solar PV capacity addition depicted in Fig. Bhattacharya and J. Washington. Photovoltaic Systems Program.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS. Thus. V.25. Ayoub. ver.1.htm โ€œCensus data 2001 and 2006 Community Profiles.1_final_for_posting-oct_27. โ€œTechnical and economic assessment of utility interactive PV systems for domestic applications in South East Queensland.โ€ Farm Credit Canada.com/en/top50pv. 2009. L. Poissant. REFERENCES [1] โ€œRenewables 2010: Global Status Report. and J.timeanddate.โ€ Renewable Energy. New York: Wiley. Available: http://www. 2009. pp. demand growth.com/ โ€œSolar Energy Technologies Plan: Multiyear technology plan 20082012. Jul 2000. โ€œPhotovoltaic Systems: A Buyerโ€™s Guide. 2. Therefore. [Online]. the discount rate and zonal solar PV capacity factors were considered to be the two most uncertain parameters in the proposed investment model. vol.ieapvps. DC. to represent the risks associated with the investments and related profits over a period of time. pp. [Online]. Wong. [Online]. 3. [Online].com/Moduleprices. However. 2008. R. Available: http://www.com/downloads/solutions/500kW-PG-US. April 2008. 2nd ed. Joshi. 14.โ€ Satcon Solar PV Inverters. vol.โ€ IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.tc.C. [Online]. 2009. and W. conventional generation and transmission capacities. and a standard deviation of 2% representing a variability of 25% around the mean to account for investment risks.โ€ Energy Economics. Dignard-Bailey. โ€œEffects of large-scale photovoltaic power integration on electricity distribution networks. 2009 and to build a green economy.โ€ in Proc.0). 6. 1.net/globalstatusreport/REN21_GSR_2010_full. Wong. vol. no.A.A. their future values may also be considered uncertain due to their inherent variability. The model was tested using the Ontario case. Available: http://www. Fuller. Kornelakis.โ€ IET Renewable Power Generation.fccfac.pdf โ€œSunrise and Sunset hours.statcan. Available: http://www. Aug.โ€ Centennial Solar. 32. [Online]. ยต=20. resulting in an expected NPV of $1.โ€ T.โ€ IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.pdf โ€œFeed-in Tariff Program.โ€ Ontario Power Authority (OPA). taking into account a very detailed and realistic representation of solar PV unit costs. S. Duffie.โ€ Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN).html J. VIII. Figure 11 shows the resulting histogram of the NPV of the probabilistic investment plan. The test results show the usefulness and practicality of the model for determining optimal investment plans on solar PV and validate the related investment decisions currently being made in Ontario. 155โ€“65. โ€œGAMS Users Manual.โ€ International Sustainable Energy Review.30657. 1991.org/countries/download/nsr09/NSR_2009_Canada_Final_June_201 0(draft1. shown in Fig. June 2010.solarbuzz. USA. [Online]. Available: http://www. the new solar PV investment decisions are shown in terms of their likelihood of being selected. Available: http://www. the discount rate is assumed here to be normally distributed with a mean of 8% in line with the current financial situation. and P. 2010. Kolhe.ca/bills/billsfiles/39_Parliament/Session1/b150ra. vol. โ€œMethodology for the design optimisation and the economic analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic systems. no. February 2007. vol. Based on the aforementioned arguments. 4.gc.โ€ Ontario Power Authority (OPA). vol.gc. vol.3.ca/media/documents/policy/report-final. discount rate can be considered as an uncertain parameter. 216-234. Aug 2010. Available: http://www. Kolhe.on.1798-1801. [Online]. โ€œNational Survey Report of PV Power Applications in Canada 2009.3. February 2009. December 1999.htm โ€œFall 2010 Farmland Values Report.โ€ Statistics Canada. โ€œTechnologies for the new millennium: Photovoltaics as a distributed resource. DeBlasio. no.โ€ Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. based on realistic estimates for solar radiation patterns.on. pp. and Y. D.โ€ US Department of Energy. no. with a standard deviation of 10% to account for their unpredictability.C. Khouzam.3. Iss. Sept. 24.ca/Storage/102/11160_FIT_Program_Overvi ew_August_new_price_version_1. Available: http://www. 476-492. POWER SYSTEMS. Available: http://canmetenergycanmetenergie. Lund.ontla.powerauthority.โ€ GAMS Development Corporation. March 2002. 8 [4] [5] W. an optimal planning model for investment in large-scale solar PV generation from the perspective of an individual investor has been presented. pp. It should be highlighted that the estimated NPV converges in about 500 Monte Carlo simulations. A. [Online].808). K. Available: http://fit. Y. 23. APRIL 2011. Furthermore. 2010. 2005. 2006 and the Energy Efficiency Act and to amend other statutesโ€.142 million. โ€œWorld's largest photovoltaic power plants. [Online].pdf โ€œOperating Cost of Trucks in Canada 2005. 1. โ€œEconomic viability of stand-alone solar photovoltaic system in comparison with diesel-powered system for India.ren21. S. pp. and revenues for a 30 year investment plan.centennialsolar.13 that the new investments are still concentrated in the first four years of the plan period. Kroposki. Gwartney.25.

and is currently a full Professor. [Online]. He has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. control and computational issues in power systems within the context of competitive electricity markets and smart grids. Eng. Quito-Ecuador.D. [Online]. where he has held various academic and administrative positions and is currently a full Professor and the Associate Director of the Waterloo Institute for Sustainable Energy (WISE). POWER SYSTEMS.asp [34] P. long-term planning and energy-environment linkages and sustainable development. in 1984 where he held different teaching and administrative positions from 1983 to 1993. Power System Stability and Control. [35] โ€œSurface meteorology and Solar Energy (SSE) Dataset. August 2008.sygration.larc. smart grids and hybrid vehicles. Available: http://www. University of Waterloo.ca/ipsp/Storage/82/7763_B-11_updated_2008-09-04.ieso. Available: http://eosweb. and Comp. degree in electrical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology. His research activities concentrate in the study of stability.Sc. His research interests are in power systems. India (1993โ€“1998). Karachi-Pakistan. [31] โ€œOntario Generation Report. He has been the recipient of various IEEEPES Working Group awards. Univ.โ€ Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO). release 6.ACCEPTED TO IEEE TRANS. and holds and has held several leadership appointments in IEEE-PES technical committees and subcommittees. scenario analysis.gov/sse/RETScreen/ 9 IX. March 2008.org/solar/pvcost. in 1993. โ€œSustainable Convergence of Electricity and Transport Sectors in the Context of Integrated Energy Systems.E.โ€ Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO). sustainable energy systems. He was on the faculty of Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research. 1994. economics and planning. Currently. University of Waterloo since 1993. Gรถteborg. APRIL 2011. distributed generation economics and planning. His MSc (1988) and PhD (1991) degrees in Electrical Engineering are from University of Wisconsin-Madison. Sweden (1998โ€“ 2002). BIOGRAPHIES Wajid Muneer (Sโ€™10) received the B.โ€ NASA Earth Science Enterprise Program in collaboration with CANMET Technology Centre. . deregulation and retail competition issues. Caรฑizares (Sโ€™86-Mโ€™91-SMโ€™00-Fโ€™07) received the Electrical Engineer degree from Escuela Politecnica Nacional (EPN). Waterloo.โ€ Public Renewables Partnership. operation. McGraw Hill. in electrical engineering from the University of Waterloo. simulation. 080904.com/gendispsample. Dept.ca/imoweb/pubs/marketReports/OntTxSystem_2009aug . Waterloo. [Online]. global energy models.htm [29] โ€œOntario Transmission System. Bombay. Hajimiragha. ON. Waterloo.ca/imoweb/marketdata/genDisclosure. Kankar Bhattacharya (Mโ€™95โ€“SMโ€™01) received Ph. Available: http://www. [Online].repartners. mathematical modeling. [28] โ€œPV cost factors.html [32] โ€œOntarioโ€™s Integrated Power System Plan. degree in electrical engineering from N.powerauthority.pdf [30] A.pdf [33] โ€œMonthly Generator Disclosure Report. [Online]. August 2009. since 2003. optimization. [Online].ieso.nasa. New Delhi. He was awarded Hydro One research chair in 2010. He has been with the E&CE Department. modeling. University of Engineering and Technology.โ€ Ontario Power Authority (OPA).โ€ Sygration. His research interests are in power system operations and economics.D.0.. Elec. Canada. and Chalmers University of Technology. demand-side management.on. electricity markets. Claudio A.E. 2010. he is pursuing M. in 2007. Available: http://www.A. Available: http://www. Available: http://www. simulation. Kundur. ver.โ€ PhD thesis.