Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 CEUs
Earn
The Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology is an ADA CERP Recognized Provider
TM
1-888-INEEDCE
This course has been made possible through an unrestricted educational grant from Kerr TotalCare . The cost of this CE course is $59.00 for 4 CEUs. Cancellation/Refund Policy: Any participant who is not 100% satisfied with this course can request a full refund by contacting the Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology in writing.
Educational Objectives
At the completion of this course, the dental healthcare professional (DHCP) will be able to: 1. Understand the chain of infection and how infection control strategies break that chain or prevent infection transmission. 2. Discuss the roles of the following methods in breaking the chain of infection: hand hygiene, instrument processing, environmental asepsis, and personal protective barriers. 3. Describe the concept of cleaning prior to disinfection or sterilization relative to hand hygiene, instrument processing, environmental asepsis, and personal protective barriers. 4. Understand how to select and use appropriate products correctly.
procedures have been found to pose a serious exposure hazard for DHCPs.1
Introduction
All dental procedures provide an opportunity to transmit infectious pathogens directly or indirectly between patients and workers. The pathway of disease transmission between people is referred to as the chain of infection, and infection control programs focus on breaking this chain. This educational course addresses hand hygiene, instrument processing, environmental asepsis, and use of personal protective barriers relative to breaking the chain of infection, undertaking sequenced processes of cleaning prior to disinfection or sterilization, and using appropriate products correctly. Single-dose and disposable products as alternatives to bulk or re-usable items and their roles in addressing the goals of safety and efciency are also considered. Disease transmission requires a source of microbes, a method of transmission and exposure, an entry portal, and a susceptible host. Microbial exposure can be direct or indirect. Direct exposure may occur through injury or contact with non-intact skin, mucosal tissue, or ocular tissue or through ingestion. Examples of direct and indirect transmission are shown in Table 1. Hand contact with contaminated surfaces is an example of indirect contact and can result in cross-contamination, endangering patients and staff alike. Both contaminated surfaces and aerosols generated during dental Table 1. Direct transmission primary exposure Needle-stick and sharps injuries Injury from an instrument during a procedure Spray or debris entering the eye Bacterial aerosol and splatter during a procedure Unprotected skin Indirect transmission secondary exposure Contaminated instruments Contaminated surfaces and equipment Bacterial aerosol
2
Hand hygiene is the single most critical procedure in the infection control program.
Personal and Surface Barriers Barriers are designed to prevent exposure. Intact skin is the rst line of defense against infection. The second line of defense is the use of personal protection barriers. Avoiding personal exposure is preferable to the stress, time, and cost of responding to an exposure incident. Routine use of personal barriers to prevent pathogens from contacting mucosal tissues of the eyes, oronasal mucosa, or any openings in skin has been
www.ineedce.com
very successful in reducing DHCP exposure to infections, and is now standard practice. However, if workers become lax in their use of barriers such as wearing them out of position, wearing them past their lifespan, re-using single-use items, or failing to wear them, then infection is more likely to occur. Masks were originally designed to protect the patient from contamination caused by the operator coughing, speaking, etc. Face shields, eyewear, and masks protect DHCPs from exposure to potentially infectious uids and debris, as well as from injury due to ying particles. Patient treatment masks and respirators also lter breathed air. Dental professionals have been found to have higher rates of conjunctivitis than the non-dental population,4 highlighting the importance of protective eyewear.
Surface Cleaning and Disinfection Any exposed clinical contact surface should be rst cleaned and must then be disinfected using intermediate-level disinfectants (those that are effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis a highly resistant organism used to test surface disinfectants) between patients. Cultures of operatory surfaces have yielded a variety of microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and the transmission of this pathogen to a number of patients occurred during dental procedures in one study.5 Hepatitis B transmission between patients has been documented, and the investigators speculated that a lapse in environmental asepsis procedures was the most likely mechanism of transmission.6 Both studies highlight the importance of effective surface barriers and decontamination. Instrument Processing Instrument processing must be appropriate to the procedures for which the instrument or component is used. Heat-sterilizable and disposable items offer the highest level of asepsis to reliably prevent disease transmission and are required for critical instruments (those that penetrate the mucosa). For semi-critical instruments (those that contact the mucosa), immersion in high-level disinfectant/sterilants may be acceptable if the instrument is heat-sensitive and cannot be otherwise sterilized.7 (Figure 1) Breaking the chain of infection requires a sequence of steps. Instrument processing is quicker, more controlled, and less error-prone with automated devices and processes such as instrument washers, ultrasonic cleaners, and current-model sterilizers thereby reducing risk.
Perform the procedure: single-use disposable and sterilized instruments Discard all sharps into sharps container; discard all single-use items
Spray enzymatic foam onto non-disposable instruments and trays to start cleaning process Heat-sterilize all critical instruments, all heat-resistant semi-critical and non-critical instruments
Store packaged, sterile instruments Clean all non-disposable instruments Chemical-sterilize all heat-sensitive semi-critical and non-critical instruments
www.ineedce.com
Single-use Disposable and Unit-dose Items Disposable and unit-dose products are becoming more available and economical. These offer time-saving alternatives to the sequential steps required in the processing of re-usable dental items and should avoid potential cross-contamination. Single-use disposable items cannot be sterilized or safely disinfected and must be discarded after one use and disposed of appropriately. Single-use sharps, such as needles and scalpels, should be placed in an approved sharps container in the operatory immediately after use, for later collection and disposal. (Figure 2) Other single-use disposable items should also be disposed of in the operatory. Figure 2.
or non-visible debris or organic substances may interfere with disinfection and sterilization. This concept applies to hand hygiene, environmental asepsis, and reprocessing reusable instruments and items. Cleaning and Sanitizing Hands The CDC recommends a combined regimen of both handwashing to clean hands and use of waterless hand sanitizers to kill organisms throughout the day. Handwashing with soap and water removes organisms and physical matter from hands, and may also kill organisms if antimicrobial soaps are used. If hands are visibly soiled, handwashing is always required. Waterless hand sanitizers are poor cleaners but excellent antiseptics, and have been found to be signicantly more effective than handwashing with antiseptic soap or plain soap at killing organisms.8,9 For surgical procedures, antimicrobial soap or an alcohol-based hand-rub with substantivity is required10 this will reduce hand ora and provide a residual antimicrobial effect under gloves, thus reducing bacterial regrowth. (Figure 3) Wearing gloves does not nullify the need for hand hygiene gloves may be compromised or may have undetected defects that allow hand contamination. Hand hygiene is necessary prior to donning gloves, and hands must also be decontaminated after glove removal to remove pathogens and to reduce the ora that may have multiplied in the warm, moist environment under gloves.
Non-surgical procedures
Surgical procedures
Instrument cleaning
Hands visibly soiled: Wash with water and plain or antimicrobial soap
Hands not visibly soiled: Wash with water and plain or antimicrobial soap OR use an alcohol-based hand-rub
Wash with antimicrobial soap OR wash with plain soap and use an alcohol-based hand-rub with substantivity
Wash hands with water and plain or antimicrobial soap OR apply waterless hand sanitizer
www.ineedce.com
For handwashing: 1. Wet hands with water. 2. Apply soap. 3. Lather for at least 15 seconds. 4. Thoroughly rinse with water, and dry hands using disposable towels. Plain soap and water effectively clean hands; they do not destroy pathogens. For alcohol-based hand-rubs or solutions: Follow the manufacturers recommendations for application and length of use. Alcohol-based products destroy pathogens; they do not effectively clean hands. technique must be observed; gloves must be removed when compromised, and after each patient, and hand hygiene performed immediately after removing gloves. Fresh gloves from the end of an open box in the operatory have been found to be contaminated with microorganisms prior to use11; therefore, gloves should ideally be stored in a closed container prior to use. Sharp-edged jewelry, and long or ragged fingernails are contraindicated as they may harbor organisms, tear and compromise gloves, as well as make gloves difficult to don. Instrument Processing Instrument cleaning can be achieved by using enzymatic solutions and ultrasonic cleaning, by using instrument washers/disinfectors, or by hand scrubbing. Closedcassette systems involve the use of operatory cassettes as trays that can be closed and locked after use and prior to cleaning, and can also be placed in a mechanical instrument cleaner prior to being sterilized. (Figure 4) This automates the process and minimizes the risk of personal injury. Figure 4.
be carried out wearing heavy-duty utility gloves to reduce the risk of puncture (masks, protective eyewear, and gowns should also be worn), scrubbing one instrument at a time, low down in the sink to minimize the risk of injury.12 Hand scrubbing after instruments have been treated with enzymatic cleaner (Figure 5) and/or ultrasonic cleaning is safer, as the organic matter and most of the debris have already been removed. Figure 5.
Eyewear, Masks and Gowns Protective eyewear should be lightweight, clear, and distortion-free. Protective eyewear and face shields should be washed and disinfected between patients, following the manufacturers instructions. Surgical masks should be worn for all dental procedures and should ideally be stored in a protected container to prevent contamination prior to use. If a mask becomes damaged or damp during a procedure, it should be changed out for a new mask. Clinical uniforms should protect all personal clothing and exposed skin, including the arms. If soiled, a clean gown should be donned. Single-use disposable gowns and shoe/foot shields are also available.
Gloves and masks should ideally be stored in a closed container prior to use.
Appropriate Product Selection and Use
Infection control products should be selected based on the anticipated level of contamination exposure and the type of procedure being performed. Consult manufacturers to understand the uses and limitations of all infection control products, and communicate that information to all DHCPs. Hand Hygiene Hand hygiene compliance is affected by perceptions that there is a low risk of cross-infection and that gloves are enough; compliance is also affected by perceived time
5
Hand scrubbing heavily contaminated instruments is unwise. If hand scrubbing must be performed, it should
www.ineedce.com
pressures and by irritated and dry skin.13 Non-compliance is a large contributing factor to disease outbreaks.14 Hand hygiene must be practical, routine, non-irritating and convenient. Liquid- or foam-dispensed soaps in closed containers offer convenience and a reduced likelihood of contamination; however, they should not be topped-off, as this increases the risk of contamination. Bar soaps are exposed to microbial contaminants and are therefore less suitable; in public settings, these have been found to be a potential source of cross-infection.15 Available antimicrobial soaps include VioNex Antimicrobial Liquid Soap (Kerr TotalCare), which contains chloroxylenol, skin conditioners and emollients; Sani-Sept (Crosstex), which contains 0.3% triclosan, aloe vera and vitamin E; and Hibiclens (GC America) which contains chlorhexidine. Foam-dispensed, closed-container soaps offer superior coverage using the minimum amount of product, reducing the potential for skin reactions. (Figure 6) Antimicrobial soaps are available with chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine gluconate, quaternary ammonium, povidone-iodine, hexachlorophene, or triclosan. Note that povidone-iodine is most commonly associated with allergic reactions; hexachlorophene is contraindicated in pregnant women and on denuded skin; and the effectiveness of quaternary ammonium products is impacted by exposure to organic materials. Chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine gluconate, and triclosan are well-tolerated, effective skin antimicrobials that are minimally affected by the presence of organic matter. Antimicrobial Foaming Soaps include VioNexus (Kerr TotalCare) and Alcare (Vestal). The routine use of hand lotions containing emollients helps reduce irritation and drying of skin. Petroleum- and mineral oilbased emollients are unsuitable in lotions and alcoholbased hand sanitizers, as they affect glove integrity.
Figure 6.
hand antisepsis. An example is Sani-Tyze (Crosstex), with aloe- and water-based emollients. Available products containing both alcohol and an antimicrobial agent required for surgical alcohol-based hand products include VioNexus No Rinse Spray Antiseptic Handwash, which contains 66% ethanol, 0.10% benzalkonium chloride, and emollients; VioNex Towelette; VioNex No-Rinse Gel Antiseptic Handwash (Kerr TotalCare), formulated with chloroxylenol, cleansers, and skin conditioners; and SaniDex (PDI). Since waterless sanitizers are to be used on clean hands, non-powdered gloves are recommended. The emollients in these products make donning gloves so easy that powder is not necessary. Gloves, Eyewear and Masks Glove selection must consider the need for sterility, length of the procedure, chemical exposure, fit, latex and manufacturing allergies (alternatives to latex include nitrile and polychloroprene; nitrile provides superior chemical resistance). Eye shields must provide wraparound protection to avoid exposure from the sides of the eyes. Prescription glasses typically do not wrap around the sides of the eyes and therefore provide insufficient barrier protection; if these are used, side shields should be fitted over the legs of the eyeglasses, or an eyeshield or a full face shield should be used over them. A full face shield such as Googles (Kerr TotalCare) protects the whole face and can be worn over eyeglasses and loupes. (Figure 7) Key selection criteria for masks include the t, uid resistance, and ltration value (based on the size and percentage of particles present particle ltration efciency). (Figure 8) Regular molded and tie-on masks have been found in one study to be only 85% to 86% effective, compared with 95% to 96% efcacy for a personal respirator that lters out particulate matter.17 Masks should provide American Societty for Testing Materials (ASTM) low-, moderate-, or high-barrier protection, as appropriate to the exposure risk of an activity. High-barrier protection masks
www.ineedce.com
Foam-dispensed, closed-container soaps offer superior coverage using the minimum amount of product, reducing the potential for skin reactions.
Alcohol-based solutions, gels, and towelettes are increasingly available to the public. For maximum effectiveness balanced with skin protection and glove compatibility, only medical-quality, FDA- or EPA-approved hand sanitizers should be used. Alcohol-based hand-rubs have been found to be more cost-effective and less timeconsuming than handwashing.16 Concentrations should be 60% to 95%; ethanol-based products are more effective against viruses than isopropanol-based products (which are also more drying to skin). Dispensers or towelettes offer convenience and ease-of-use without requiring a sink. Many waterless sanitizers contain only alcohol as the active ingredient and are recommended for non-surgical
6
should be available for procedures that can result in higher levels of moisture and/or dust exposure, and moderateand low-barrier protection masks should be available for lower-exposure procedures. For easy selection, Patterson masks are named according to ASTM level of protection. Crosstex clearly communicates the level of protection of their masks on the boxes, and the company offers training in selection. N95 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) respirators provide respiratory protection above that required for daily use and are recommended for transmission-based precautions, such as exposure to inuenza. Figure 7.
boards in the clinical setting should also receive the same impermeable wrap. Figure 9.
Figure 8.
Air-water syringe tips are an example of successful replacement of re-usable items by disposable products. Cleaning non-disposable metal air-water syringe tips is difficult and time-consuming due to their narrow lumens. The problem is compounded by the retraction of materials into the lumen. To break the chain of infection, disposable air-water syringes are a recommended alternative. They are compatible with standard non-disposable fittings, are cost-effective, and are made of plastic with or without a metal tip insert to the handle of the syringe. (Figure 11) Other variants include plastic syringes with rubber O-ring seals and push-button converters for quick, user-friendly, tip changing (Seal-Tight Disposable Air-Water Syringe Tips, Kerr TotalCare). In addition to single-use disposable accessories and instruments, unit-dose products help reduce the risk of microbial contamination when handled aseptically, saving both time and money.
7
Figure 11.
Choosing a product with a shorter TB kill time reduces the time the product must remain on the surface, and thereby reduces associated costs.
Figure 12.
Figure 13.
15 16
17
Summary
Successful infection control breaks the chain of infection by applying the concept of cleaning prior to disinfection or sterilization and by following recommended steps in the logical and appropriate sequences. This strategy applies to hand hygiene, instrument re-processing, environmental asepsis, and use of personal protective barriers, and should be central to establishing ofce protocol and safety product selection. New single-use disposable items, as well as quicker and safer chemical and physical treatments, have become key components of an appropriate infection control program.
18
19
recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR 2002;51(No. RR-16). Kabara JJ, Brady MB. Contamination of bar soaps under in-use conditions. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 1984;5:114. Huber MA, Holton RH, Terezhalmy GT. Cost analysis of hand hygiene using antimicrobial soap and water versus an alcohol-based hand rub. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(2):3745. Checchi L, Montevecchi M, Moreschi A, Graziosi F, Taddei P, Violante FS. Efcacy of three face masks in preventing inhalation of airborne contaminants in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(7):877882. Bures S, Fishbain JT, Uyehara CF, Parker JM, Berg BW. Computer keyboards and faucet handles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens in the intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2000;28(6):465471. Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Sterilization, disinfection, and asepsis in dentistry. In: Block SS, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2001:1053.
Author Profile
Nancy Andrews, RDH, BS Ms. Andrews is a nationally recognized speaker, author and educational consultant and has written more than 80 peer-reviewed articles. She received her B.S.D.H. from University of Southern California, where she was later a clinical instructor. Ms. Andrews practiced clinical Dental Hygiene for 20 years. She has consulted with individual and large dental facilities, dental laboratories and dental corporations on clinical safety and OSHA compliance. She has given seminars nationally and internationally on topics including Diseases and Infection Prevention, Biolms, and Dental Waterlines and also participated in the drafting of the OSAP Position Paper on Dental Unit Waterlines. Ms. Andrews is an active member of OSAP, ADHA, and CDHA. She can be reached at Nancyandrewsrdh.com.
References
1 Bentley CD, Burkhart NW, Crawford JJ. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125(5):579584. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports. Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings 2003; 52(No.RR-17). Huber MA, Holton RH, Terezhalmy GT. Cost analysis of hand hygiene using antimicrobial soap and water versus an alcohol-based hand rub. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(2):3745. Lonnroth EC, Shahnavaz H. Adverse health reactions in skin, eyes, and respiratory tract among dental personnel in Sweden. Swed Dent J. 1998;22(12):3345. Kurita H, Kurashina K, Honda T. Nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus via the surfaces of the dental operatory. Br Dent J. 2006 Sep 9;201(5):297300. Redd JT, Baumbach J, Kohn W, Nainan O, Khristova M, Williams I. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis B virus associated with oral surgery. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(9):13111314. CDC. Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry, 1993. MMWR. 1993;42(No. RR-8). Girou E, Loyeau S, Legrand P, Oppein F, Brun-Buisson C. Efcacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2002;325(7360):362. Kac G, Podglajen I, Gueneret M, Vaupre S, Bissery A, Meyer G. Microbiological evaluation of two hand hygiene procedures achieved by healthcare workers during routine patient care: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect. 2005 May;60(1):3239. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports. Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings 2003;52(RR-17). Luckey JB, Bareld RD, Eleazer PD. Bacterial count comparisons on examination gloves from freshly opened boxes versus nearly empty boxes and from examination gloves before treatment versus after dental dam isolation. J Endod. 2006;32(7):646648. www.osha.gov/SLTC/dentistry/index.html. Accessed 2007. Huber MA, Holton RH, Terezhalmy GT. Cost analysis of hand hygiene using antimicrobial soap and water versus an alcohol-based hand rub. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(2):3745. CDC. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings:
Disclaimer
The author(s) of this course has/have no commercial ties with the sponsors or the providers of the unrestricted educational grant for this course.
7 8
Reader Feedback
We encourage your comments on this or any ADTS course. For your convenience, an online feedback form is available at www.ineedce.com.
10
Non-Educational Content
TotalCare, a division of Kerr, offers an extensive array of infection control products for the dental industry. TotalCare features the brand names Pinnacle and Metrex. Pinnacle products include barrier protection accessories and single-use disposables for the dental operatory. Metrex infection control products serve to protect staff and patients with products for surface disinfection, instrument sterilization and hand care. All TotalCare products are available from authorized dealers.
9
11
12 13
14
www.ineedce.com
Questions
1. The pathway of disease transmission is referred to as the _______________.
a. b. c. d. a. b. c. d. chain of affection chain of infection infection linkages All of the above.
11. An alcohol-based hand-rub is acceptable as the sole hand hygiene procedure _______________.
a. for non-surgical procedures if hands are visibly soiled b. for surgical procedures c. for non-surgical procedures if hands are not visibly soiled d. b and c.
a. are difcult and time-consuming to clean b. are required and there is no suitable substitute c. can be substituted by plastic single-use disposable air-water syringe tips d. a and c.
a. pathogens may have gained entry through defects in the gloves during the procedure b. ora may have multiplied in the warm, moist environment under the gloves c. hands will feel dry after removing gloves d. a and b. a. b. c. d. are required for all procedures are required for surgical procedures are required for instrument cleaning All of the above.
a. the ability of the product to serve as both a cleaner and disinfectant b. the TB kill time c. the ability of the solution to dry rapidly d. a and b.
4. Transient ora is more commonly associated with healthcare-related infections than resident ora.
a. True. b. False.
24. The same wipe can be used for cleaning and disinfecting, without a fresh one being required.
a. True. b. False.
15. With respect to liquid and foam soaps dispensed from closed containers, _______________.
a. the soap dispenser containers can be topped-off b. they are more convenient than bar soaps and reduce the risk of contamination c. they do not contain emollients d. All of the above.
16. Foam-dispensed soaps offer superior coverage using the minimum amount of product.
a. True. b. False.
26. Pre-cleaning instruments with enzymatic foam prior to ultrasonic cleaning _______________.
7. Cultures of operatory surfaces have yielded organisms including methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus.
a. True. b. False.
a. chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, povidone-iodine b. triglycerides, iodophones and chlorhexidine c. quaternary ammonium, hexachlorophene d. a and c.
a. increases the lifespan of ultrasonic solutions b. decreases the likelihood of corrosion of the ultrasonic bath c. increases the concentration of ultrasonic cleaning solution required d. All of the above.
9. Instrument cleaning, the essential rst step in instrument processing can be carried out with _______________.
a. b. c. d. ultrasonic cleaners enzymatic solutions instrument washers All of the above.
18. Of the antimicrobials that can be included in soaps, ____________ is most commonly associated with allergic reactions and ___________ is contraindicated in pregnant women.
a. b. c. d.
povidone-iodine, hexachlorophene povidone-iodine, chloroxylenol chlorhexidine gluconate, quaternary ammonium None of the above.
a. should only be performed wearing heavy-duty utility gloves b. can be performed wearing light surgical gloves c. is safer if the instruments have been pre-treated with an enzymatic cleaners or cleaned ultrasonically d. a and c.
a. use of intermediate-level disinfectant is acceptable b. only high-level disinfectants can be used c. use of intermediate-level disinfectant would meet EPA guidelines d. All of the above. www.ineedce.com
10
ANSWER SHEET
Instructions to obtain dental continuing education credits: 1) Complete all information above. 2) Complete answer sheets in either pen or pencil. 3) Mark only one answer for each question. 4) Successful completion of this course will earn you 4 CEUs. 5) A blank duplicate answer sheet may be copied for additional course participants.
Course Evaluation
Please evaluate this course by responding to the following statements, using a scale of Excellent = 5 to Poor = 0. 1. How would you rate the objectives and educational methods? 5 4 3 2 1 0 2. To what extent were the course objectives accomplished? 5 4 3 2 1 0 3. Please rate the course content. 5 4 3 2 1 0 4. Please rate the instructors eectiveness. 5 4 3 2 1 0 5. Was the overall administration of the course eective? 5 4 3 2 1 0 6. How do you rate the authors grasp of the topic? 5 4 3 2 1 0 7. Do you feel that the references were adequate? Yes No 8. Do you feel that the educational objectives were met? Yes No 9. If any of the continuing education questions were unclear or ambiguous, please list them. __________________________________________________ 10. Was there any subject matter you found confusing? Please describe. __________________________________________________ 11. Would you participate in a program similar to this one in the future on a dierent topic? Yes No 12. What additional continuing dental education topics would you like to see? __________________________________________________
For IMMEDIATE results, go to www.ineedce.com and click on the button ENTER Answers Online. Answer sheets can be faxed with credit card payment to (216) 255-6619, (440) 845-3447, or (216) 398-7922. Payment of $59.00 is enclosed. (Checks and credit cards are accepted.) If paying by credit card, please complete the following: MasterCard Visa AmEx Discover Acct. Number: _______________________________ Exp. Date: _____________________
AUTHOR DISCLAIMER The author(s) of this course has/have no commercial ties with the sponsors or the providers of the unrestricted educational grant for this course. INSTRUCTIONS Each question should have only one answer. Grading of this examination is done manually. Participants will receive verication in the mail within three to four weeks after taking an examination. SPONSOR/PROVIDER This course was made possible through an unrestricted educational grant from Kerr TotalCare. No manufacturer or 3rd party has had any input into the development of course content. All content has been derived from the references listed and the opinions of clinicians. Please direct all questions pertaining to the ADTS or the administration of this course to the program director: P.O. Box 116, Chesterland, OH 44026, or e-mail aeagle@ineedce.com. PARTICIPANT FEEDBACK Questions can be e-mailed to aeagle@ineedce.com or faxed to (216) 255-6619, (440) 845-3447, or (216) 398-7922.
COURSE CREDITS/COST All participants scoring at least 70% (answering 21 or more questions correctly) on the examination will receive verication of 4 CEUs. The formal continuing education program of this sponsor is accepted by the AGD for Fellowship/Mastership credit. For current terms of acceptance, please contact the ADTS. DANB Approval indicates that a continuing education course appears to meet certain specications as described in the DANB Recertication Guidelines. DANB does not, however, endorse or recommend any particular continuing education course and is not responsible for the quality of any course content. Participants are urged to contact their state dental boards for continuing education requirements. The cost of this course is $59.00. EDUCATIONAL DISCLAIMER The information presented here is for educational purposes only. It may not be possible to present all information required to utilize or apply this knowledge to practice. It is therefore recommended that additional knowledge be sought before attempting a new procedure or incorporating a new technique or therapy. The opinions of ecacy or the perceived value of any products or companies mentioned in this course and expressed herein are those of the author(s) of the courses and do not necessarily reect those of the ADTS.
RECORD KEEPING The ADTS maintains records of your successful completion of any exam. Please contact our oces for a copy of your continuing education credits report. This report, which lists all credits earned to date, will be generated and mailed to you within ve business days of receipt of your request. CANCELLATION/REFUND POLICY Any participant who is not 100% satised with this course can request a full refund by contacting the Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology in writing. COURSE EVALUATION We encourage participant feedback pertaining to all courses. Please be sure to complete the survey included within the answer sheet. 2007 by the Academy of Dental Therapeutics and Stomatology
INF0707PATT
11
www.ineedce.com