Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uzbekistan Turkmenistan Belarus Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Russia Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan Armenia Moldova Ukraine Georgia
1 Strongest
7 Weakest
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
The failure of virtually any of the countries of Eurasia to shed old governance habits and end monopolies on political and economic power has been one of the greatest disappointments of the past two decades. Regimes in countries as diverse as Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, and Uzbekistan have taken steps to adapt to new circumstances and maintain power.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
7 Strongest Romania Bulgaria Hungary Slovakia Czech Republic Latvia Lithuania Estonia Poland Slovenia
On the whole, the 10 new EU member states have performed well on Nations in Transit democracy indicators, but reform efforts have flagged in recent years. However, the role of money in politics and economically weakening media sectors are among the issues that should raise concern about the depth and durability of democracy in the region.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
7 Strongest Kosovo Bosnia & Herzegovina Albania Macedonia Montenegro Serbia Croatia
Despite public aspirations for moving toward the EU, most reforms stagnated in the Balkans during 2011, with multiple declines in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Macedonia.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
2009 2010
4 2011 2012
7 Weakest
The report notes Hungarys year-on-year performance as the most glaring example of democratic decline among the newer European Union (EU) members, where the combination of poorly rooted traditions of democratic practice, resilient networks of corruption, low levels of public trust, and shaky economic conditions have hampered indelible democratic reforms.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
NIT Years
2008
4
2009
2010 2011
2012
7 Weakest
Ukraine, which saw a brief opening in democratic space after the Orange Revolution in 2004, has seen significant decline in an alarmingly short period of time. Under the Yanukovich government, Ukraine's democracy ratings worsened in five categories year-onyear, with a steep decline in judicial independence and an overall democracy score that is rapidly approaching its preOrange Revolution level.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
Bulgaria
Hungary
Albania
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Ukraine
2010 2011
2012
7
Weakest
Declines were most numerous in the judicial independence category in 2011, appearing in every subregion covered by Nations in Transit. A total of eight countriesAlbania, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraineregressed on this indicator.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
Negative Change
Positive Change
Romania
Poland
NIT Years
2012 Lithuania 2011 2010 2009 2008
Hungary
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
Strongest
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Weakest
Democracy Gap Across Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, NIT 2012
National Democratic Governance
NIT Year 2012
Russia
Corruption Electoral Process
Estonia
Judicial Independence Civil Society
Independent Media
Countries with the least democratic ratings take up the greatest area on the graph. For example, a country with the absolute worst rating would fill the entire graph, while a country with a perfect democratic score would not be visible at all. Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
Azerbaijan
4.00 NIT Civil Society Ratings 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Fearing the demonstration effect of uprisings in the Arab Middle East, authoritarian regimes in Belarus, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan cracked down hard on protesters in 2011, using the full weight of pliant judiciaries to preempt and punish dissent.
Azerbaijan
4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00
Belarus
Kazakhstan
2011
2012
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
2004
3.00 3.50 NIT Democracy Scores 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.
Note: The NIT ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The 2012 ratings reflect the period January 1 through December 31, 2011.