Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
I I
(2a)
+ =
I I I
b c c
(2b)
The area (|
m
) occupied per molecule is determined as:
A
m
N
=
I
1
where N
A
is the
Avogadros number (610
23
mol
-1
). The |
m
for alcohols are about 0.22 nm
2
and for carboxylic
acids about 0.25 nm
2
extrapolated from the liquid condensed regions and |
m
are about 0.20
nm
2
extrapolated from the solid regions of two-dimensional isotherm of monolayer,
idependent of both the length of the hydrocarbon chain and the nature of the head.
Apparatus
Du Nouy tensiometer is a high sensitive microbalance (a delicate instrument and you should
use care when working with it), bakers, volumetric flask, pipettes
18
Du Nouy tensiometer
Chemicals
deionized water, aqueous solution of alcohol or organic acids.
Experimental procedure
This tensiometer is capable of measuring the surface tension of liquids with the du Nouy ring.
The du Nouy tensiometer consists of a platinum-iridium ring supported by a stirrup attached
to a torsion balance. The force that is just requiring breaking the ring free of the liquid/liquid
or liquid/air interface is proportional to the surface tension. The surface tension is displayed
in mN/m, accurate to 0.1 mN/m.
Attach the ring to the balance. Fill the test vessel with the water, and suspend the ring in the
liquid and zero the instrument with the ring below the surface of the liquid. If you are making
a surface tension measurement begin to lower the platform that the wessel (petri dish) is on
and add tension to the ring to maintain the ring in position until the ring breaks free of the
liquid. Read off measurement when surface breaks. Then make the measurement as before.
The ring can be cleaned with distilled water. Care must be taken that the ring is not
touched with the fingers or bent. You can correct this apparent surface tension based on the
geometry of the ring to obtain the true surface tension by multiplying by a correction
factor=
water
/
water measured
. The correction factor is normally close to one.
Prepare 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2 mol dm
-3
aqueous solutions of alcohol or organic acid in
bakers, separately. Measure the surface tension of solutions with the tensiometer starting with
the water and the more diluted solutions (take 3-5 measurements and take the average). After
measurement of every solution rinse the vessel with the next (more concentrated) solution. Do
not discharge the solutions before you calculate the results.
19
c, mol/L
c,1
, mN/m
c,2
, mN/m
c,3
, mN/m
c,average
c, corrected
0
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.4
1
1.5
2
Calculation of results
Calibration with water: Correction Factor. It is necessary to apply a correction factor that
takes into account the shape of the liquid held up by the ring (the ring is not perfectly flat and
circular. It is bent and tilted. The liquid film (surface) will not be perfectly flat and some
liquid will flow downwards making the surface tension not even over the surface. We
calibrate by measuring for water. Take 5 measurements and take the average to be
water
.
The correction factor will be [72.0/
water
], where 72.0 mN/m is the literature value of surface
tension of water and is the experimental value. Multiply every future measurement by this
correction factor.
Plot the measured surface tension vs. concentration
=f (c). Read the slope of the curve (tg
o= d/dc ) at the given concentration as the Figure 1 shows.
Tabulate the data and calculate I = f(c) the surface excess concentration of the solutions with
the aid of the Gibbs equation.
c, mol/L y
2
x
2
y
1
x
1
d I
c
c/I
c
0
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.4
1
1.5
2
20
Plot the Gibbs isotherm (Fig1b) and the linear representation of the isotherm, c/I = f(c) and
determine the value of I
=
I
1
. Discuss the result and compare with literature results.
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
c, mol/l
,
m
N
/
m
0.0E+00
1.0E-06
2.0E-06
3.0E-06
4.0E-06
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
c, mol/l
I
c
,
m
o
l
/
m
2
Figure 1. Graphical differentiation of the measured surface tension vs. concentration plot,
=f
(c). Gibbs adsorption isotherm, I = f(c).
y = mx + b
R
2
= 0.9983
0.0E+00
2.5E+05
5.0E+05
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
c, mol/l
I
/
c
,
l
/
m
2
m = 1/I
max
Linear representation of the isotherm, c/I = f(c)
Review questions
What is the surface tension? What is the capillary activity and inactivity effect? How does the
surface tension change with the temperature?
21
3. Polymers relative molecular masses from viscosity measurements
Theory
Rheology is the science of flow and deformation of body and describes the interrelation
between force, deformation and time. Rheology is applicable to all materials, from gases to
solids. Viscosity is the measured of the internal friction of a fluid. This friction becomes
apparent when a layer of fluid is made to move in relation to another layer. The greater the
friction is the greater amount of force is required to cause this movement, which is called
shear. Shearing occurs whenever the fluid is physically moved or distributed, as in pouring,
spreading, spraying, mixing, etc. Highly viscous fluids, therefore, require more force to move
than less viscous materials.
Isaac Newton defined viscosity by considering the model: two parallel planes of fluid of equal
area A are separated by a distance dy and are moving in the same direction at different
velocities v
1
and v
2
. Newton assumed that the force required maintaining this difference
in speed was proportional to the velocity gradient.
To express this, Newton wrote:
dy
dv
A
F
q = where q is a constant for a given material and is
called its viscosity. The velocity gradient, dv/dy, is the measure of speed at which the
intermediate layers move with respect to each other. It describes the shearing the liquid
experiences and is thus called shear rate. This will be symbolized as D in subsequent
discussions. Its unit is called reciprocal second, s
-1
. The term F/A indicates the force per unit
area required to produce the shearing action. It is referred to as shear stress and will be
symbolized by t. Its unit of measurements is N/m
2
(Newton per square meter). Using these
simplified terms, viscosity may be defined mathematically by this formula:
D rate shear
stress shear
ity vis
t
q = = = cos The fundamental unit of viscosity measurement is Pas,
Pascal-seconds. A material requiring a shear stress of one Newton per square meter to
produce a shear rate of one reciprocal second has a viscosity of one Pas. (You will encounter
viscosity measurements in centipoises (cP) , but these are not units of the International
System, SI; one Pascal-second is equal to ten poise; one milli-Pascal-second is equal to one
centipoise.) Newton assumed that all materials have, at a given temperature, a viscosity that is
independent of the shear rate. In other words twice the force would move the fluid twice as
fast.
22
Viscosities of dilute colloid solutions. For most pure liquids and for many solutions and
dispersions q is a well defined quantity for a given temperature and pressure which is
independent of t and dv/dy, provided that the flow is streamlined (i.e. laminar), these are so-
called Newtonian liquids or solutions. For many other solutions and dispersions, especially
if concentrated and/or if the particles are asymmetric, deviations from Newtonian flow are
observed. The main causes of non-Newtonian flow are the formation of a structure throughout
the system and orientation of asymmetric particles caused by the velocity gradient. Capillary
flow methods, the most frequently employed methods for measuring viscosities are based on
flow through a capillary tube. The pressure under which the liquid flows furnishes the
shearing stress. The relative viscosities of two liquids can be determined by using a simple
Ostwald viscometer. (Figure 1). 10 mL liquid is introduced into the viscometer. Liquid is then
drawn up into the right-hand limb until the liquid levels are above A. The liquid is then
released and the time, t(s) for the right-hand meniscus to pass between the marks A and B is
measured. For a solution the relative viscosity:
0 0
t
t
rel
= =
q
q
q (1)
where t and t
0
is the flowing time for solution and solvent, respectively, q
0
and q is the
viscosity of pure solvent and solution. The specific increase in viscosity or viscosity ration
increment: q
spec
= q
rel
-1. The reduced viscosity (or viscosity number):q
spec
/c. The intrinsic
viscosity (or limiting viscosity number):
| |
c
spec
c
q
q
0
lim
= =
c
rel
c
q ln
lim
0
(2)
From expressions it can be seen that the reduced viscosities have the unit of reciprocal
concentration. When considering particle shape and solvation, concentration is generally
expressed in terms of the fraction of the particles (ml/ml or g/g) and the corresponding
reduced and intrinsic viscosities are, therefore dimensionless.
Spherical particles. Einstein made a hydrodynamic calculation relating to the disturbance of
the flow lines when identical, non-interacting, rigid, spherical particles are dispersed in a
liquid medium, and arrived at the expression: ( ) | q q 5 . 2 1
0
+ = . The effect of such particles on
the viscosity of dispersion depends, therefore, only on the volume which they occupy and is
independent of their size. For interacting, non-rigid, solvated or non-spherical particles the
Einstein form is not applicable because the viscosity depends on these parameters. Viscosity
measurements cannot be used to distinguish particles of different size but of the same shape
23
and degree of solvation. However, if the shape and/or solvation factor alters with particle size,
viscosity measurements can be used for determinining the particle size (for molar mass). The
intrinsic viscosity of a polymer solution is, in turn, proportional to the average solvation factor
of the polymer coils. For most linear high polymers in solution the chains are somewhat more
extended than random, and the relation between intrinsic viscosity and relative molecular
mass can be expressed by a general equation proposed by Mark and Houwink:
| |
o
q
visc
M K = (3)
where K and o are characteristic of the polymer-solvent system. Alpha depends on the
configuration (stiffness) of polymer chains. In view of experimental simplicity and accuracy,
viscosity measurements are extremely useful for routine molar mass determinations on a
particular polymer-solvent system. K and o for the system are determined by measuring the
intrinsic viscosities of polymer fractions for which the relative molecular masses have been
determined independently, e.g. by osmotic pressure, sedimentation or light scattering. For
polydispersed systems an average relative molar mass intermediate between number average
(alpha=0) and mass average (alpha=1) usually results:
a
a
visc
dN M
dN M
M
1
1
(
(
+
Apparatus
Ostwald viscometer, beaker, volumetric flask, pipette
Chemicals
0.5 g/mL aqueous stock solution of PVA.
Experimental procedure
Prepare the following concentration series of polyvinyl alcohol: 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05
g cm
-3
by diluting the stock solution appropriately. Use 10-10 ml from each solution for the
measurement, start first with the solvent and go on from the most diluted to the more
concentrated solutions. Determine the relative viscosities by using an Ostwald viscometer.
Tabulate the data and plot q
spec
/c and ln q
rel
/c against concentration. Determine the intrinsic
viscosity with extrapolation of the curves as Figure 2 shows. Calculate the molar mass from
Equation 3, with K=0.018 and o=0.73 for PVA.
24
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 0.02 0.04 0.06
c, g/mL
q
spec
/c
ln q
rel
/c
Figure 1 Figure 2
Ostwald viscometer Determination of the limiting viscosity number
by extrapolation c0 of reduced viscosity concentration curves
Calculation of results
c (gcm
-3
) t (s) t (s) t (s) t
average
(s) q
rel
q
spec
q
spec
/c (ln q
rel
)/c
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Review questions
Rheological classification of materials. The ideal chain mathematic model for linear
polymers.
25
4. Adsorption from solution
Theory
Adsorption is the enrichment (positive adsorption, or briefly, adsorption) or depletion
(negative adsorption) of one or more components in an interfacial layer. The material in the
adsorbed state is called the adsorbate, while that one which is present in the bulk phase may
be distinguished as the adsorptive. When adsorption occurs (or may occur) at the interface
between a fluid phase and a solid, the solid is usually called the adsorbent. Sorption is also
used as a general term to cover both adsorption and absorption. Adsorption from liquid
mixtures occurs only when there is a difference between the relative composition of the liquid
in the interfacial layer and in the adjoining bulk phase(s) and observable phenomena result
from this difference. For liquids, accumulation (positive adsorption) of one or several
components is generally accompanied by depletion of the other(s) in the interfacial layer;
such depletion, i.e. when the equilibrium concentration of a component in the interfacial layer
is smaller than the adjoining bulk liquid, is termed negative adsorption and should not be
designated as desorption. Equilibrium between a bulk fluid and an interfacial layer may be
established with respect to neutral species or to ionic species. If the adsorption of one or
several ionic species is accompanied by the simultaneous desorption (displacement) of an
equivalent amount of one or more other ionic species this process is called ion exchange.
It is often useful to consider the adsorbent/fluid interface as comprising two regions. The
region of the liquid phase forming part of the adsorbent/liquid interface may be called the
adsorption space while the portion of the adsorbent included in the interface is called the
surface layer of the adsorbent. With respect to porous solids, the surface associated with pores
communicating with the outside space may be called the internal surface. Because the
accessibility of pores may depend on the size of the fluid molecules, the extent of the internal
surface may depend on the size of the molecules comprising the fluid, and may be different
for the various components of a fluid mixture (molecular sieve effect). In monolayer
adsorption all the adsorbed molecules are in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent. In
multilayer adsorption the adsorption space accommodates more than one layer of molecules
and not all adsorbed molecules are in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent.
The surface coverage (u) for both monolayer and multilayer adsorption is defined as the ratio
of a, the amount of adsorbed substance, to a
m
, the monolayer capacity (the area occupied by a
26
molecule in a complete monolayer):
m
a a/ = u . Micropore filling is the process in which
molecules are adsorbed in the adsorption space within micropores. The micropore volume is
conventionally measured by the volume of the adsorbed material, which completely fills the
micropores, expressed in terms of bulk liquid at atmospheric pressure and at the temperature
of measurement. Capillary condensation is said to occur when, in porous solids, multilayer
adsorption from a vapour proceeds to the point at which pore spaces are filled with liquid
separated from the gas phase by menisci. The concept of capillary condensation loses its
sense when the dimensions of the pores are so small that the term meniscus ceases to have a
physical significance. Capillary condensation is often accompanied by hysteresis.
Adsorption from solution is important in many practical situations, such as those in which
modification of the solid surface is of primary concern (e.g. the use of hydrophilic or
lipophilic materials to realize stable dispersions in aqueous or organic medium, respectively)
and those which involve the removal of unwanted material from the solution (e.g. the
clarification of sugar solutions with activated charcoal). Adsorption processes are very
important in chromatography, too.
The theoretical treatment of adsorption from solution is in general complicated since this
adsorption always involves competition between solute(s) and solvent. The degree of
adsorption at a given temperature and the concentration of the solution depend on the nature
of adsorbent, adsorbate and solvent. Adsorption behaviour from solution can often be
predicted qualitatively in terms of the polar/ nonpolar nature of the solid and the solution
components. A polar adsorbent will tend to adsorb polar adsorbates strongly and non-polar
adsorbates weakly, and vice versa. In addition, polar solutes will tend to be adsorbed strongly
from non-polar solvents (low solubility) and weakly from polar solvents (high solubility), and
vice versa.
Experimentally, the investigation of adsorption from solution is comparatively simple. A
known mass of adsorbent solid is shaken with a known volume of solution at a given
temperature until there is no further change in the concentration of supernatant solution. This
concentration can be determined by a variety of methods involving colorimetry,
spectrophotometry, refractometry and surface tension, also chemical and radio-chemical
methods where it is appropriate. The apparent amount of solute adsorbed per mass unit of
adsorbent can be determined from the change of solute concentration in the case of diluted
solution. The specific adsorbed amount can be calculated as follows:
( ) c c
m
V
a =
0
(1)
27
where a is the specific adsorbed amount, g/g , at constant volume , V is the volume of
solution, dm
3
, m is the mass of adsorbent, g in volume V, c
0
and c are the initial and
equilibrium concentrations , g/dm
3
of dissolved substance, respectively. In many practical
cases it is found that the adsorption obeys an equation known as the Langmuir isotherm. This
equation was derived from adsorption of gases on solids and assumes that:
1. the adsorption is limited to monolayer
2. and occurs on a uniform surface; i.e. all sites for adsorption are equivalent,
3. adsorbed molecules are localized,
4. there is no interaction between molecules in a given layer; independent stacks of
molecules built up on the surface sites.
The Langmuir equation may be written as follows:
c b
c a
a
s
m
+
=
/ 1
(2)
where a
s
m
is the monolayer capacity or the amount adsorbed at saturation, c is the equilibrium
concentration of solute and b is constant. The monolayer capacity can be estimated either
directly from the actual isotherm or indirectly by applying the linear form of the Langmuir
equation which is given by:
s
m m
a b a
c
a
c 1
+ = (3)
A plot of c/a against c must be a linear line with a slope of 1/a
s
m
. The surface area of the solid
(usually expressed as square meters per gram) may be obtained from the derived value of a
m
provided that the area occupied by the adsorbed molecule on the surface is known with
reasonable certainty.
m A m surface
N a A | = (4)
where N
A
is Avogadros number and |
m
is the cross-sectional are of an adsorbed molecule.
Recall that the surface area determined by this method is the total area accessible to the solute
molecules. If these are large (e.g. dyestuffs, long chain molecules) they may not penetrate the
pores and cracks, and the area obtained may be only a fraction of the true surface area of the
solid.
28
Apparatus
Spectrophotometer with 1 cm cells, volumetric flasks, beakers, volumetric pipettes, burette,
measuring cylinder, laboratory shaker
Chemicals
Adsorbent (aluminum oxide), dye solution (indigo carmine).
Experimental procedure
Prepare a concentration series of indigo carmine solution from the stock solution with a 100
cm
3
volumetric flask for the calibration curve and the adsorption experiments. For the
calibration about 10-20 cm
3
, for the adsorption measurements 50-50 cm
3
of solutions are
necessary. Suggested concentrations are 1.010
-4
, 1.510
-4
, 2.010
-4
, 2.510
-4
, 3.010
-4
,
4.010
-4
mol/dm
3
.
Clean six 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks which should either have glass-stoppered tops or are
fitted with rubber stoppers. Put 0.100.01 g of aluminum oxide (weighed accurately between
0.11g and 0.09g to the forth decimal place in a weighing dish or on a weighing paper) into
each flask. To each of these flasks add with a pipette exactly 50-50 cm
3
of indigo carmine
solution from the concentration series and shake the flasks for at least 1 hr in order to reach
the adsorption equilibrium. Past this time, let the adsorbent settle out from the solution and
measure the absorbance (optical density) A of the supernatant from each sample with a
spectrophotometer. Plot the points A=f(c
0
) and draw the calibration curve, the best-fit straight
line, through these points.
c
0
, mol/L 0 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 2.0E-04 2.5E-04 3.0E-04 4.0E-04
Abs 0
29
0
0.5
1
0.0E+0 2.0E-4 4.0E-4
c
0
, mol / L
A
A(c
e
)
c
e
Figure 1. Determination of the equilibrium concentration c or c
e
of the dye in solution in
presence of the adsorbent from the calibration curve (absorbance vs. concentration).
Calculation of results
Calculate the adsorbed amounts with the equation 1. Plot the original (equation 2) and the
linearized form of Langmuir equation (equation 3). Determine the slope of the line and
calculate the a
s
m,
monolayer capacity. Calculate the specific surface area of the adsorbed
(equation 4); the area occupied by an indigo-carmine molecule on the surface is 1.34 nm
2
(recall that 1 nm =10
-9
m).
c
o
(mol/L) 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 2.0E-04 2.5E-04 3.0E-04 4.0E-04
A after adsorption
c (mol/L) after adsorption
m (g) mass of adsorbent
a (mol/g) specific adsorbed amount
c/a (g/l)
30
0.E+00
1.E-05
2.E-05
3.E-05
4.E-05
0.E+00 1.E-04 2.E-04 3.E-04 4.E-04
c(mol dm
-3
)
a
(
m
o
l
g
-
1
)
Figure 2. Langmuir isotherm.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.E+00 1.E-04 2.E-04 3.E-04 4.E-04
c(mol dm
-3
)
c
/
a
(
g
d
m
-
3
)
Figure 3. Linearized representation of the Langmuir isotherm. The inverse slope Ax/Ay of the
best-fit straight line gives a.
Review questions
The definition of adsorption. The Langmuir isotherm.
m m
a b a
c
a
c 1
+ =
c b
c a
a
m
+
=
/ 1
31
5. Solubilization
Theory
Soluble amphipathic substances, both ionic and nonionic, show sharp changes in a variety of
colligative physical chemical properties at a well-defined concentration which is characteristic
of the solute in question. These phenomena are attributed to the association of solute
molecules into clusters known as micelles. The concentration at which micellization occurs is
known as the critical micelle concentration, generally abbreviated CMC. Figure 1 shows the
superpositioned curves for a variety of properties (such as surface tension, electrical specific
and molar conductance, freezing-point depression, osmotic pressure, turbidity) versus
concentration for sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions. Another interesting property of micelles is
their ability to solubilize materials which otherwise are insoluble in aqueous solutions.
Insoluble organic matter, for example, may dissolve in the interior of the micelle even though
it shows minimal solubility in water. Certain oil-soluble dyes barely color water, but give
vividly colored solutions above the cmc. This solubilization of organic molecules in micelles
is known to play an important part e.g. in the process of emulsion polymerization.
k
t
~ 0.008 M
k
t
~ 0.008 M
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a variety of properties (k conductivity, t osmotic
pressure, t turbidity, surface tension, and equivalent conductivity) of sodium dodecyl
sulfate versus concentration.
32
In discussing micellization, we have intentionally restricted attention to concentration near to
cmc where the micelles are fairly symmetrical in shape and far enough from each other to be
treated as independent entities. At higher concentration, neither of these concentrations is met
and more complex phase equilibria must be considered.
Figure 2. Pictorial represantation of the conformation of surfactant molecules (monomers) in
solution. Above the CMC (a) micelles are formed. At higher surfactant concentration, the
amphiphiles form a variety of structures, here illustrated with (b) a liquid crystalline lamellar
single-phase and (c) reversed micelles, an isotropic single-phase.
The critical micelle concentration depends on the solvent, the structure of the surfactant
molecules, the salt concentration and the temperature. For charged micelles, the situation is
complicated by the fact that the micelle binds a certain number of counterions with the
remainder required for electroneutrality distributed in an ion atmosphere surrounding the
micelle. The data show that as the salt concentration increases the CMC decreases, the degree
of aggregation increases, and the effective percent ionization decreases. The CMC of a
nonionic surfactant generally decreases and the size of micelles increases with increasing
temperature because of the decrease of solvation (hydrogen bond) with the temperature. The
solubility of ionic surfactants shows a rapid increase from a certain temperature known as the
Krafft point, this is the temperature at which the surfactants apolar chains melt.
The study of solubilized systems obviously starts with the determination of the concentration
of the solubilizate which can be incorporated into a given system with the maintenance of a
single isotropic solution. This saturation concentration of a solubilizate for a given
concentration of surfactant is termed the maximum additive concentration, which shows the
solubilization ability of the surfactant for the given solubilizate. The maximum additive
concentration increases with increasing surfactant concentration. Above the maximum
additive concentration a second phase of the matter appears. The maximum additive
concentration or the solubilized amount depends on the hydrophilic-hydrophobic character of
33
the organic matter. The organic molecule, depending on its structure, takes place in the
micelle according to the equalization of polarities (Hardy-Harkins principle).
Apparatus
Volumetric flasks, beakers, volumetric pipettes, burette, magnetic stirrer or shaker.
Chemicals
Non-ionic surfactant (e.g. Tween 20 or 40), organic acids (e.g. salicylic or benzoic acid),
0.1 M NaOH solution, propanol.
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20)
(HLB: 16.7)
Experimental procedure
Prepare a 5% (m/V) stock solution from 5 g of surfactant in a 100 cm
3
volumetric flask.
Dilute from the stock solution 100-100 cm
3
surfactant solutions with concentrations of 2%,
1%, 0.5%, 0.2%, 0.1% and 0%. Pour 50-50 cm
3
into iodine value flasks separately, and put
about 0.5-0.5 g of organic acid into each of them. Stir the content of the flasks with magnetic
stirrer for 1 hour then separate the insoluble organic acid from the solution with centrifugation
or filtration. Pipet 10--10 cm
3
aliquots of equilibrium solutions into Erlenmayer flasks and
add 5-5 cm
3
of propanol (to dissolve the acid) and titrate with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
solution using 2-3 drops of phenolphthalein indicator. Make sure not to overtitrate the
solutions, the pink color should remain faint but persistent.
34
Calculation of results
Calculate the quantity of acid solubilized (m) in g/10 cm
3
of surfactant solution. Plot the
calculated amounts m as a function of the surfactant concentration c. Calculate the slope and
the intersection of the best fit straight line. The slope of this line gives amount of acid
solubilized by 1 g of surfactant (if the concentration is plotted in units of g/10 cm
3
).
Surfactant concentration % 0 0,1 0,2 0,5 1,0 2,0
Surfactant g/10 ml solution
Added NaOH ml /10 ml solution
Titrated acid (g) /10ml solution
Review questions
What is solubilization? What kind of ionic and non-ionic surfactants do you know?
Solubilized organic acid as a function of surfactant concentration
T
i
t
r
a
t
e
d
a
c
i
d
(
g
/
1
0
m
l
)
35
6. Determination of size distribution of a sedimenting suspension
Theory
The size of a spherical homogeneous particle is uniquely defined by its diameter. For irregular
particles derived diameters are determined by measuring a size-dependent property of the
particle and relating it to a linear dimension. The most widely used of these are the
equivalent spherical diameters. If an irregular shaped particle is allowed to settle in a liquid,
its terminal velocity may be compared with the terminal velocity of a sphere of the same
density settling under similar conditions. The size of the particle is then equated to the
diameter of the sphere. That is to say we use the diameter of some consubstantial sphere that
has the same sedimentation rate as the measured particle to represent the dimension of the
actual particle. In the laminar flow region, the particle moves with random orientation, the
free-falling diameter becomes the Stokes diameter.
Average diameters. The purpose of the average is to represent a group of individual values in
a simple and concise manner in order to obtain an understanding of the group. It is important,
therefore that the average should be representative of the group. All average diameters are a
measure of central tendency which is unaffected by the relatively few values in the tails of
distribution. The most commonly occurring values are the mode, mean and median. The
mode the value at which the frequency density curve shows a maximum. For the
mean:
=
|
|
d
xd
x , where | is the frequency function. | = EdN for a number distribution; | =
EdW = Ex
3
dN for a volume or weight distribution. The median is the value of 50 %
frequency.
50
100
0 50 100 150 200
x
%
mean + o
mean - o
84
16
mean o ~ 68 %
o = 15
Figure 1. Cumulative percentage curves for normal distribution.
36
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
x
d
/
d
x
o 33.5 ; P 1.3
o 15 ; P 1.065
mean = mode = meadian = 100
mean o=68.26%
mean 2o=95.5%
Figure 2. Relative percentage frequency curves for normal distribution.
The principle of the sedimentation is the determination of the rate at which particles settle out
of a homogeneous suspension. This may be determined by allowing the sediment to fall on to
a balance pan and weighing it. In a sedimentation cylinder h is the height of suspension above
the balance pan in meter; the weight per cent P(t) which has settled out at time t is made up of
two parts; W consists of all particles with a free-falling speed greater than that of r
Stk
as given
by Stokes law, where r
Stk
is the size of particle which has a velocity of fall h/t; the other
consists of particles smaller than r
Stk
which have settled because they started off at some
intermediate position (h*<h) in the fluid column.
( )
q
g r
t h v
0
2
9
2
/
= = hence
( )gt
h
r
Stk
0
2
2
9
q
= hence
t
cons
r
Stk
= ;
( )g
h
cons
0
2
9
q
= (1)
Where r is radius of particles in meter; and
0
are the densities of the particle and medium;
h is the height of suspension in meter; t is the time of the settling in second; q=0.001 Pas is
the viscosity; g=9.81 m/s
2
. It can be shown that part of the smaller particles is t dP/dt, so
dt dP t W t P / ) ( + = (2)
Since P and t are known, it is possible to determine W using this equation by graphical
differentiation as Figure 3 shows.
37
.00
.25
.50
.75
1.00
0 5 10 15 20 25
r, micron
W(r)
dW/dr
Figure 3. Determination of weight percentage oversize, W(r) from a graph of weight of
powder sedimented, P(t) against time, t.;
Cumulative W(r) and differential dW/dr (r) distribution functions
Apparatus
Sedimentation cylinder, sedimentation balance
Chemicals
4 g of silica powder, deionized water
Experimental procedure
Fill the sedimentation cylinder with water, mark the water level and measure the height of the
column of water (h in m) above the pan. Add about 4 g of silica powder and a stirring bar into
the cylinder and stir the suspension for about 10 minutes with a magnetic stirrer. After
removing the stirring bar (do not pour it in the sink!) stir manually the suspension by moving
thoroughly the balance pan up and down, put the cylinder in place as fast as you can, then
hang the hook on the balance and start the computer program immediately. The computer
records the settled weight (P
t
, g) and the sedimentation time (t, s). It is necessary to measure
until the most of the powder has settled out onto the balance pan, which takes around 4550
minutes. The last value recorded is the maximum sedimented weight P
t=
or 100%.
After printing out the sedimentation curve, choose at least 10 to 15 points on the curve
(preferentially grouped near the most curved part) and draw a tangent to each of these points.
Determine the y axis interception (W%) of these tangents. Calculate the Stokes radius
corresponding to each of these points from the Equation 1. Fill in the table shown below and
draw a graph of W% as a function of r. The graph W% = f(r) gives the integral size
distribution curve of the silica suspension.
38
Save the data and open it in excel.
h (m) P
(g)
medium
kg/m
3
solid
kg/m
3
q (Pas)
2600 1000 0.001
Calculation of results
t (s) r (m) W (%) t (s) r (m) W (%)
Determine the most commonly occurring value of particle size from the inflexion point of
function of W(r) = f(r), read particle sizes at the 16%; 50% and 84%; see Figure 1 and 2.
Determine the difference between the size r
50%
- r
84 %
and r
16 %
- r
50%
. Discuss the results.
Review questions
What is the Stokes radius? What is the advantage and disadvantage of this method?
Characterize the normal distribution!
39
7. Zeta potential measurements of dyes by paper electrophoresis
Theory
When a colloid particle emerges in a polar solvent or an electrolyte solution, a surface charge
will be developed through preferential adsorption of ions or dissociation of surface charged
species. In order for the interface to remain neutral the charge held on the surface is balanced
by the redistribution of ions close to the surface. The overall result is two layers of charge (the
double layer). The liquid layer surrounding the particle exists as two parts; an inner region
(Stern layer) where the ions are strongly bound and an outer (diffuse) region where they are
less firmly associated. Within this diffuse layer is a notional boundary known as the slipping
plane, within which the particle acts as a single entity. The potential at the slipping plane is
known as the zeta potential and its value can be determined by measurement of
electrophoretic mobility. The movement of a charged particle relative to the liquid it is
suspended in under the influence of
an applied electric field:
where F
el
the direct electric force, E is the magnitude of the electric field (V/m= applied
voltage /distance of electrodes), and Q is the particle charge, F
fric
, f the friction force and
coefficient, v velocity x distance, t time, (=81) is the dielectric constant of the dispersion
medium,
0
is the permittivity of free space (8.910
-12
C N m
-2
), is dynamic viscosity of the
dispersion medium (0.01 Nm
-2
s), and is zeta potential in V.
0
cc
q
,
u
=
Zeta potential is related to the electrophoretic mobility by the
Smoluchowski approximation.
since
x
= mobility
t
6 /
el
fric el fric
F QE
F fv F F
QE v Q
v u
f E f
ze ze
u
r kT D tq
=
= =
= = =
= =
40
Scheme of a horizontal electropheresis
apparatus.
The apparatus and experimental procedure
The apparatus consists of air-tight housing, a horizontal plastic surface, which keeps the
paper, two electrodes in the pool, high voltage power supply, volt meter and ampere meter.
Filter paper is used as a supporting medium for the solvent bulk.
Indicate the start place in the center of the suitable sized strip of chromatographic paper
with a dashed line by a pencil.
Drop some micro liter from each solution of different dyes with capillary tubes at the start line
where there is no graphite. Let about 2 cm between the concentrated spots of dyes and the
edge of the strip and dry them.
Wet the paper thoroughly spraying with the solvent and place in the apparatus so the ends of
paper immerse in the buffer.
Cover it with its lid and switch on the power. The experiment takes one hour with 1500 V of
high voltage and maximum 40 mA. Measure the time and after 1 hour switch off the
apparatus. Take off the paper dry it, measure the distance traveled by the substances from the
pencil line. Measure the distance of electrodes, and calculate the zeta potentials of dyes.
Don't forget the sign of the zeta potential.
Calculation of results
Applied voltage: V; Distance of electrodes, m
E is the magnitude of the electric field: V/m
41
dyes distance, m time, s velocity, m/s mobility, m
2
/Vs zeta pot., V
Discuss the results
Review questions
Definition of the zeta potential. What kind of relation is between of the colloid stability and
the zeta potential of lyophobic colloids? What type of compounds are the used dyes? What is
the origin of the dyes charge?
42
8. Steric and electrostatic stabilization mechanisms of colloidal dispersions
Theory
DVLO theory suggests that the stability of a colloidal system is determined by the sum of the
van der Waals attractive (VA) and electrical double layer repulsive (VR) forces that exist
between particles as they approach each other due to the Brownian motion they are
undergoing. This theory proposes that an energy
barrier resulting from the repulsive force prevents
two particles approaching one another and
adhering. But if the particles collide with sufficient
energy to overcome that barrier together
DVLO theory assumes that the stability of a
particle in solution is dependent upon its total
potential energy function V
T
.
Electrostatic and steric stabilization and bridging flocculation mechanisms of colloidal
dispersions.
The charge which is carried by surface determines its electrostatic potential. For this reason
they are called the potential-determining ions. We can calculate the surface potential on the
crystals of silver halids by considering the equilibrium between the surface of charged crystal
and the ions in the surrounding solution:
or
) ( 59
0 pzc
pAg pAg =
or
) ( 59
0 pzc
pCl pCl = where a pa
10
log =
( )
0
ln ln
PZC
kT
a a
ze
=
43
where
0
surface potential , a activity of potential determining ion, a
pzc
concentration at point
of zero charge. pAg
pzc
=4.5 (Ag
pzc
=2.910
-5
M) and pCl
pzc
=5.2 (Cl
pzc
=6.310
-6
M) the
solubility product for AgCl K
sp
=1.810
-10
.
Chemicals
0.05% PVA solution, 0.005 M AgNO
3
and 0.005 M KCl solution, deionized water.
The apparatus and experimental procedure
Cary spectrophotometer, glass tubes, pipettes, optical cuvette.
Follow the basic instructions of the Manual for the use of the CARY 50 UV-Vis
Spectrophotometer and select : Dwell Time: 0s; Cycle Time: 0.5 min; Stop Time: 15 min
Prepare 5 ml A and 5 ml B solutions according the table:
A solution, ml B solution, ml
sol preparation PVA 0.05 % Cl
-
0.005 M water Ag
+
0.005 M water
1 pour B into A and back 0 1 4 1 4
2 pour B into A and back 1 1 3 1 4
3 pour B into A and back 0.1 1 3.9 1 4
4 pour B into A and back 1.1 3.9 0.9 4.1
5 pour A into B and back 0.95 4.05 1.05 3.95
6 pour A into B and back 0.9 4.1 1.1 3.9
Start the timer, prepare the sols 1, 2, 3 and measure their transmittance, T% in time about for
15 minutes.
Repeat the experiments with the sol 4, 5, 6.
Plot the six T% ~ time curves on the same graph. Compare the curves. Calculate the nominal
surface potentials.
sol a
Ag
0
observation
1
2
3
44
4
5
6
Discuss the results
Compare and discuss the colloid stability of the sols.
Review questions
Definition of the point of zero charge. What kind of relation is between of the colloid stability
and the zeta potential of lyophobic colloids? What is the origin of the charge of silver halide
sols? How charged is a stoichiometric silver chlorides?
45
9. Determination of the critical micelle concentration of SDS
Theory
Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that possess both hydrophobic and hydrophilic
properties. A typical surfactant molecule consists of a long hydrocarbon tail that dissolves in
hydrocarbon and other non-polar solvents, and a hydrophilic headgroup that dissolves in
polar solvents (typically water). Amphiphilic molecules can be found in a wide range of
chemical structures, e.g. one or two hydrophobic chains as well as cationic, anionic or neutral
polar heads. Anionic head groups are commonly found in soaps, as the strongly hydrophilic
carboxyl and sulphonate groups increase their solubility in water. On the other hand, cationic
head groups exhibit anti-bacterial properties, which find use in mild antiseptics and
disinfectants.
If these molecules are dissolved in water, a large amount of solvent molecule is needed to
keep them in the solution since the secondary interaction between the hydrophobic part and
the water molecules is quite week. As a consequence less water molecules remain in the bulk
solvent to form dipole-dipole interactions and H-bonds (entropy effect). Thus increasing the
concentration of the surfactants, a point is reached where the formation of these hydrated
molecules are not favorable considering the Gibbs free energy. At this particular
concentration, which depends on the physical-chemical properties of both the surfactant and
the solvent and the temperature, they have a tendency to form aggregates spontaneously, that
is, surfactant molecules will arrange themselves into organized molecular assemblies, also
called normal micelles. Above this concentration which is called Critical Micelle
Concentration (CMC) the solvent molecules are exluded from the hydrophobic chains
while the micelle surface becomes polar, hereby the solubility of the micelle is better than
the monomeric species. Therefore less solvent molecule is needed for the solvation so the
entropy of the bulk solution increases. The shape and size of a micelle is a function of the
molecular geometry of its surfactant molecules and solution conditions such as surfactant
concentration, temperature, pH, and ionic strength. Increasing the surfactant concentration the
number of particles changes due to the micelle formation, the colligative properties such as
surface tension, conductivity, boiling point, osmotic pressure, etc. show a break around CMC.
46
Conductometric Determination of the CMC
Below the CMC, the addition of surfactant to an aqueous solution causes an increase in the
number of charge and consequently, an increase in the conductivity. Above the CMC, further
addition of surfactant increases the micelle concentration while the monomer concentration
remains approximately constant (at the CMC level). Since a micelle is much larger than a
monomer it diffuses more slowly through solution and so it is a less efficient charge carrier. A
plot of conductivity against surfactant concentration is, thus, expected to show a break around
CMC.
Apparatus:
Consort multiparameter analyser,
magnetic stirrer rod,
pipettes, tall vessel
Chemicals:
0.1 M SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulphate)
stock solution, MilliQ deionized water
Experimental procedure
Measure 50 cm
3
of distilled water into a tall glass vessel and put a magnetic stirrer rod into it.
Wash the conductometric cell at least 3 times with fresh MilliQ water. As we want to measure
only the conductivity change of the solution we do not need an accurate calibration. Put the
vessel on the magnetic stirrer and immerse the electrode into the solution until the three black
signs on the measuring cell go under the liquid surface. Switch on the stirrer and measure the
conductivity of the distilled water. Switch on the Consort multiparameter analyser, and open
the Data Information System software on the computer to registrate the measured values. Start
data registration with the green button in the menu. This way you can manually save the
measured value pressing the STORE button. Data will be registrated separately in two
coloumns for the two electrodes.
After measuring the conductivity of water add given volumes of stock solution into the vessel,
wait for the stabilization of the value and store the conductance. Repeat this step according to
the instructions. After the last reading please wash the glassware, the sirring rod and the
measuring cell accurately with distilled water an leave the electrode immersed in water. Fill
the conductance values in the Table.
47
Calculation:
Calculate the derived conductivity (k), the molar conducitivity (A) using the following
equations:
water measured
k k k =
'
c
'
k
= A (Calculate in SI units!)
Plot the c-k and c -A (Lottermoser-diagram) curves, find the breakpoints on the curves and
calculate the CMC values from the two figures.
0.0E+00
5.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.5E-01
2.0E-01
0 5 10 15 20 25
c(mol m
-3
)
k
(
S
m
-
1
)
Determine the CMC value of SDS, and discuss it. (literature data: 0.008 mol dm
-3
at 25
o
C)
Review questions
What kind of ionic and non-ionic surfactants do you know? Define the critical micelle
concentration! Describe the reasons of micelle formation!
8.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.2E-02
1.4E-02
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
A
(
S
m
2
m
o
l
-
1
)
3
c
n
V
increments
(cm
3
)
V
total added
( cm
3
)
V
total
( cm
3
)
c
(mol dm
-3
)
c
(mol m
-3
)
k
measured
(S cm
-1
)
k
(S cm
-1
)
k
(S m
-1
)
c
A
(Sm
2
mol
-1)
0. 0 0 50 0 0
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.