Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research-based information about bee propolis its health based propolis. benefits and possible side effects.
At near freezing temperatures or less than 15C it becomes harden and fragile. At normal temperatures (25C - 45C) it is a lenient, tender and very sticky substance. At 46C - 59C temperatures, it will become stickier. At 60C - 70C most sample will become liquid. In some other samples, the melting point is 100C [2]. However, in one of the most recent research, it is reported that bee propolis from Amaicha del Valle can stay stable even at 120C temperature [7].
I personally believe that the best temperature to keep and consume bee propolis is a room temperature. This is simply because the fact that bees themselves can get the maximum benefits in such temperatures inside their hives.
How Mankind Use Bee Propolis No doubt that propolis has a long history. It serves various purposes, especially when it comes to medicinal concern. The first known usage by mankind is in the age of Ancient Egypt. Archeologists found a numerous pictures on vases and ornaments that show us about the relation between mankind and bees. Some pictures also show us that Egyptian at that time know some benefits from various bee products. In 4th century in Greece, Hippocrates gave prescription to use bee propolis. He uses it to cure external and internal wounds, as well as ulcers. Gaius Plinius Secundus or also known as Pliny the Elder from Roman also talked about this bee product. He wrote a well known encyclopedic work titled Naturalis Historia. In that book, he tells about various resins usages, including bee propolis uses for treating inflammations, relieve pain, and same as Hippocrates to cure wounds.
Next historical record comes from Europe in 12th century. It is said that bee propolis can be effectively be used to treat oral health problem, such as infections and caries[8]. Then, in the year of 1957, John Gerard told us about how he uses bee propolis in the book titled Generall Historie of Plantes. In his book, John said that this resinous substance works effectively to heal and quicken the recovery process.
Other Uses Aside From Health Concern Aside from its functions in medical and health concern, bee propolis is also used for waterproofed containers, glue, wood preservatives/varnished especially for musical instruments (such as violins or guitar), preparing bow string and for tuning drums[9]. Even in some carpolishing products, it works as a catalyst to convert fats and oils into a quality car wax polishing products[10].
What thing that makes the chemical substances different? First of all, we need to keep in mind that propolis is not directly produced like the way bees produce their venom. Bee venom produced directly from their body, while propolis is 'manufactured' from particular vegetation. So, the vegetation source is one of the main factor that directly determine its chemical substances. (For more detailed explanation, you can read about how bee propolis is made in the main page of this blog) So, is that means that each propolis gives a different health benefits for us? Well, the answer to this kind of question was what experts trying to get. One of the very first research that studying this topic was done by Kujumgiev[11]. Kujumgiev examined antimicrobial properties of bee propolis from different geographic location. The result shows that all samples give notable antibiotic effects (antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral). This fact aligns with the actual function of propolis for bee colonies as the defender against various diseases, (especially American Foulbrood).
Kujumgievs work was then followed up by more studies. Many of those studies focused on a different biological effect of propolis, such as its anti cancer, hepatoprotective, antioxidant effect, anti-inflammatory, etc. Below are some other notable studies that you might need to know: Study by Popova[12], assess correspondence between biological activity and geographic location of bee propolis samples from Europe, Brazil and Central America by using statistical approach (Analysis of variance/ANOVA). Based on the study, it is found that European and Brazilian propolis have identical activity even though each of them contains different chemical substances. Study by Kumazawa[13], examined the antioxidant effect of bee propolis from numerous geographic location. He used sample from many regions such as Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, China, Thailand, New Zealand, South Africa, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Austria, Hungary, United States and Uzbekistan. In this research, Kumazawa performed chemical analysis to identify and measure the result. He found 17 phenolic compounds from 16 types of different propolis sample. Each of bee propolis gives notable antioxidant effect, where significant antioxidant activity is originated from anti oxidative substances such as phenethyl caffeate or kaempferol.
For a quick review, here is the table[20] that shows us about the main health benefits of bee propolis along with the accountable compounds:
Bee Propolis Type European Brazilian Propolis Propolis Cuban Taiwanese (poplar (Baccharis Propolis Propolis type) type) Flavanones, Prenylated pflavones, Prenylated phenolic coumaric acids, benzophenones Unidentified labdane acids and [17] their esters diterpenes[15]
[14]
Antibacterial
Antiinflammatory
Flavanones, flavones, phenolic Unidentified [15] Unidentified[15] Unidentified acids and their esters
[15]
Prenylated pPrenylated coumaric acids, Prenylated Antitumor clerodane benzophenones flavanones [18] [19] diterpenes, benzofuranes[15] Caffeic Prenylated pacid, ferulic coumaric acis, flavonoids, acids acid, Hepatoprotective Unidentified[15] Unidentified lignans, caffeic acid their caffeoyl quinic esters[15] acids[15] Flavonoids, Prenylated pPrenylated Prenylated phenolic Antioxidant coumaric acis, benzophenones flavanones and their [18] [19] flavonoids[15] esters[21] Caffeic acid phenethyl ester[16]
All of the studies (which bring this particular topic) show us a very clear prove that even though the source and the exact chemical substances are different, bee propolis still gives the same main health benefits for us.
Antifungal Properties
European poplar-based propolis (in 10% extracts ethanol) has an effective fungistatic effect against 17 fungal pathogens[28]. It also has been demonstrated to work effectively in suppressing the growth of yeasts and fungus which responsible for ringworm and athlete's foot disease[29]. Aside from European type, another study also assesses this therapeutic effect on Brazillian type. As a record, these antifungal properties were tested on patients who suffer for onychomycosis (fungal infection of toenails or fingernails), so basically, we can consider it to be more practical compared to European type. The result shows that the Brazilian bee propolis gives desirable results against 67 yeasts which have been isolated from patients suffering to onychomycosis[30]. This antifungal effect comes to an existence due to some specific compounds. They are flavonoids (pinocembrin, sakuranetin, and pinobanksin) and caffeic acid derivatives (benzyl ester, and pterostilbene)[31]. Based on the study, the effective concentration to achieve such a desirable result for fungus infection treatment is at 0.05mg/ml of flavonoids[30].
2013 Bee Propolis Blog http://beepropolisblog.blogspot.com
10
However, please dont forget the fact that each bee propolis type gives different level of significance for a specific treatment. So if you are considering Brazilian bee propolis for treating a fungus infection, you might want to ensure that the product of your choice contains at least 0.05mg/ml of flavonoids.
11
Antiviral Properties
Antiviral properties exists in most samples of bee propolis. The problem relies in the word most, which means, we cant guarantee that every bee propolis type possess antiviral activity (especially for the less popular variants such as Canarian type). But you dont have to be worried because most of products that you can find on your nearest store are most likely to be Brazilian and European types. In addition, both of those types have been proven to show significant antiviral activity. Antimicrobial activity of bee propolis (including its antiviral activity) is highly attributed to the phenolic compounds such as flavonoids[34]. Based on Schnitzler[35] study, the specific substances that gives significant contribution to its antiviral activities are galangin and chrysin. Both of them are specific forms of flavonoids.
Just like any other antiviral drugs, some specific compounds which are contained in bee propolis possess complex capabilities to disrupt and manipulate virus life cycle. Here is the quick and simple explanation to antiviral mechanism of bee propolis which has already been verified and identified by various studies: 1) Preventing virus from entering the host cell[36,37]. 2) Reducing intracellular replication activities[36,37,38,39] . This process contributes to suppress the growth and development of virus. This can be done by the process called reverse transcriptase. This process stops some specific enzymes disabling virus capability to synthesize their RNA or DNA. 3) Stimulating our immune system to fight back against virus infection[39]..
Aside from these findings, it also needs to be remembered that the effectiveness is directly depending on its concentration level. Based on Gekkers in-vitro study, it is found that 85% 98% effectiveness level can be achieved by using 66.6 /ml concentration of bee propolis[37].
12
13
Basically, we can have a conclusion that bee propolis is a very safe supplement, unless the consumption is done with an irrationally large dosage[43] (such as over 1000 capsules of 500mg propolis extract at one time).
14
Propolis Allergy
Considering the number of negative cases in literatures, bee propolis can be claimed as a very safe supplement. The only propolis side effect which taken seriously is allergic reaction. A journal from Italy, titled Surveillance of suspected adversereactions to natural health products: the case of propolis gives us clear example about how bad this side effect can be. It is reported that during 5 years period (2002 2007), there are: 16 reports about allergic reactions in a form of dermatitis and/or respiratory problem, 2 reports regarding digestive tract. From those total 18 cases, there are 6 patients who go to emergency departments, and 2 patients suffer life-threatening side effects. Even though the number of incidents is pretty much low, it is much better that we know the risk. Propolis allergy is caused by some of its constituents. The very first detected chemical substance that is responsible in propolis allergy was LB-1[44]. LB-1 is consistently found in every chemical dissolution process from various bee propolis and poplar bud samples [45]. At the very beginning, LB-1 was initially identified to be entirely composed of 1, 1-dimethylallyl caffeic acid ester [45,46] , but then as it has been shown by the latest study, LB-1 consist of other chemical substance:
3-Methyl-2-butenyl caffeate, methyl-2-butenyl caffeate and 3-methyl-3-butenyl caffeate [44] . Phenylethyl caffeate
Among those chemical substance 3-Methyl-2-butenyl caffeate acts as the most powerful allergen factor[47,48]. It draws out a strong response found in subject experiment who acknowledge suffer to propolis allergy. The same result is also identified with phenylethyl caffeate. Later, it is determined that the main chemical substances which directy cause propolis allergy are 3-methyl-2-butenyl caffeate and phenylethyl caffeate. Aside from those two main allergens, there are also several more that is considered as moderate sensitizer[49]:
Benzyl isoferulate (Based on Hausen experiment, it is considered a noteworthy sensitizer)[48]. Coniferyl benzoate. This substance exists in fresh samples of balsam of Peru, while in propolis it has been detected only once so far [45]. Benzyl salicylate and benzyl cinnamate.
15
Many other studies show that people who suffer to propolis allergy dont show any reaction to those sensitizers [48]. However, people who suffer to propolis allergy still should be warned about potential reactions to cosmetics or products containing these substances. Flavonoids and other compounds such as waxes, fatty acids, essential oils, pollen, and other organics and minerals have no capability as allergen[50,51].
16
4. People who suffer to asthma. Some experts believe that chemical substances contained in bee propolis might worsen asthma attack. Even though some other clinical studies show otherwise (that bee propolis can help to cure asthma), you better avoid it. 5. Paediatric age children [53,54,56,57].
How to Prevent Any Unwanted Propolis Allergy Reactions It is strongly recommended to conduct patch testing, just in case for any propolis allergy symptomp [61]. You can try to consult to dermatologist before deciding to use any product that contains bee propolis. Aside from it, the consumption should begin in a small dose and then it can be steadily increased to the full dose. This kind of procedure is recommended in order to assess the compatibility with propolis allergy. For the same case, stopping bee propolis consumption also needs to be done gradually[65]. For chewing consumption, the recommended dose is maximum at 1 gram for one time in 3 times a day [66]
17
2. Reported by Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter. [68] The second case of suspected propolis side effect was happening on a 3 years old boy. He was suffering for gluten enteropathy a disorder in nutrients absorption which caused by gluten allergy. He consumed propolis to prevent infection possibility that might be caused by his disease. The boy himself was diagnosed for suffering acute renal failure after he had consumed bee propolis 2 3 times each week for 4 months periods. The renal failure symptom was shown by his excessive creatinine level. Right after he stopped the consumption, his creatinine level back to normal, and with restricted diet, his gluten enteropathy disease was getting better. Those two cases indicate that acute renal failure might happen as a result of propolis side effects. Bold warning is clearly needed, especially when it is used as a medicine or dietary supplement.
18
Cytotoxic Effectsc means a capability of being a toxic to cell. This effect may have variety results. It can cause cell lysis/apoptosis or even mutagenicity. Rodrigues work seems to be followed up recently by study conducted by Montoro. Rather than using mice as an experiment subject, Montoro used human lymphocytes cells and tested the possible propolis side effect effects by using high concentrated ethanolic extract. In conclusion, the study assumes that citotoxicity and genotoxicity on human peripheral lymphocytes might be happen as possible propolis side effects [70].
19
Reference:
1. Hill R. that, The Natural Antibiotic. Thorsons, Wellingborough, England, 1977 2. R. Krell, Value Added Products From Beekeping. FAO Agricultural Service Bulltein No. 124, 1996 3. A. Cuellar, Hernandez Rojas, Perez Martinez . 1990. Brand-new anti microbes architecture of bee propolis from Cuba. Revisi Cuba de Phararma cia, 2a (1): 5i-5b 4. GA. Burdock 2005 5. Walker, P. and Crane, E. 1987. Constituents of propolis. Apidologie, 18(4): 327-334 6. Coggshall, W. and Morse, R.A. 1984. Beeswax: production, harvesting, processing and products. Wicwas Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, 192 pp 7. Mlagan, V. and Sulimanovic, D. 1982. Action of bee glue on Bacillus larvae. Apiacta,17:16-20 8. R. Krell, Value Added Products From Beekeping. FAO Agricultural Service Bulltein No. 124, 1996 9. Jolly, V.G. 1978. Bee World, 59 (4): 158-161. 10. History Of Landau Carriage 1743" (website: http://zymol.com/readhistory.aspx) accessed in March 2011 11. Kjumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Yu, Bankova V, Christov R, Popov S. Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis from different geographic origins. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;64:23540. 12. Popova M, Bankova V, Naydensky Ch, Tsvetkova I, Kujumgiev A. Comparative study of the biological activity of propolis from different geographic origin: a statistical approach. Macedonian Pharm Bull. 2004;50:914 13. Kumazawa Sh, Hamasaka T, Nakayama Ts. Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins. Food Chem. 2004;84:32939 14. Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis) Food Chem Toxicol. 1998;36:34763. 15. Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Kadota Sh. Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis. Phytother Res. 2000;15:56171. 16. Grunberger D, Banerjee R, Eisinger K, et al. Preferential cytotoxicity on tumor cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester isolated from propolis. Experientia. 1988;44:2302. 17. Hernandez NMR, Cuesta Rubio O, Aviles A, Avellanede DLS. Actividad antimicrobiana de nemorosona aislada de Clusia rosea. Rev Cubana Farm. 2001;35(Suppl Especial):1979. 18. Cuesta Rubio O, Frontana-Uriba BA, Ramirez-Apan T, Cardenas J. Polyisoprenylated benzophenones in Cuban bee propolis; biological activity of nemorosone. Z Naturforsch. 2002;57c:3728.
20
19. Chen Ch, Weng M, Wu Ch, Lin J. Comparison of radical scavenging activity, cytotoxic effects and apoptosis induction in human melanoma cells by Taiwanese propolis from different sources. eCAM. 2004;1:17585. 20. Bankova V. Recent trends and important developments in propolis research. eCAM. 2005;2:2932. 21. Banksota AH, Tezuka Y, Adnyana IK, et al. Cytotoxic, hepatoprotective and free radical scavenging effects of propolis from Brazil, Peru, the Netherlands and China. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72:23946. 22. Scheller S, Ilewicz L, Luciak M, Skrobidurska D, Stojko A, Matuga W (1978)Biological properties and clinical application of propolis IX. Arzneim-Forsch Drug Res 28, 289-291 23. Krol W, Scheller S, Shani J, Pietsz G, Czuba Z (1993) Synergistic effect of ethanolic extract of propolis and antibiotics on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus.ArzneimForsch Drug Res 43, 607-609 24. Debuyser E (1983) La propolis. Docteur en Pharmacie Thesis, Universit de Nantes, France, 82 pp 25. Meresta L, Meresta T (1985/1986) Bee propolis antibacterial activity of flavonoid compounds occurring in flora in Poland. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 28-29, 61-63, Apic Abstr (1990) 41, 1345 26. V.Dimov, N.Ivanovska , Bankova, Nikolov, S.Popov (1992) Immunomodulatory activity of bee propolis: IV. Prophylatic (preventice medication) properties contra Gram-negative infections and water-soluble derivative adjuvant effect . Vaccine 10, 817-823 27. Takaisi-Kikuni NB and Schilcher H. Electron microscopic and microcalorimetric identified possibility of how bee propolis antibacterial effect works in a defined condition. Planta Med., 60 (3): 222-227, 1994. 28. Lisa M, Leifertova I, Baloun J (1989) Fungistatic effect of propolis. Folia Pharm Univ Carol 13, 29-44; ChemiAbstr (1991) 29. Salajan, G. 1970. Inst. Agron. "Dr. Petru Groza" Luc. Stut. Ser. Zootech. 26:165 as cited in Stanley and Linskens, 1974, p.113 and Schmidt and Buchmann, 1992 30. Ana Carla Pozzi Oliveira, Cristiane Suemi Shinobu, Renata Longhini, Selma Lucy FrancoII, Terezinha Inez Estivalet Svidzinski. "Antifungal activity of EEP against yeasts isolated from onychomycosis lesions" Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz vol.101 no.5 Rio de Janeiro Aug. 2006 31. Metzner J, Bekemeier H, Paintz P, et al. On the antimicrobial activity of bee glue constituents [in German; English abstract]. Pharmazie. 1979;34:97102. 32. Claudia Ota,Carmelinda Unterkircher, Vera Fantinato,M. T. Shimizu. "Antifungal activity of bee glue on different species of Candida" .Mycoses Volume 44, Issue 9-10, pages 375378, November 2001 33. Ota C, Unmterkirchers C, Fanatinato V, Shimssizu MT. Bee propolis antifungal effect on different species of Candida.Mycosis. 2001 Nov: 44(91-10):3475-8.
21
34. Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernndez-Lpez J, Prez-Alvarez JA. Functional properties of honey, bee glue, and royal jelly.J Food Sci. 2008 Nov;73(9):R117-24. 35. Schnitzler P, Neuner A, Nolkemper S, Zundel C, Nowack H, Sensch KH, Reichling J.Antiviral activity and mode of action from extracst and selected compounds.Phytother Res. 2010 Apr;24(4):632. 36. Bfalo MC, Figueiredo AS, de Sousa JP, Candeias JM, Bastos JK, Sforcin JM.J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Nov;107(5):1669-80. Epub 2009 Apr 21. 37. Gekker G, Hu S, Spivak M, Lokensgard JR, Peterson PK. 2005 Nov 14;102(2):158-63. Epub 2005 Jul 19. 38. Amoros M, et al, Journal of natural products (1994) 57(5):644 7 39. Harish Z, Rubinstein A, Suppression of HIV-1 replication by bee propolis and its immunoregulatory 40. Arvouet-Grand A, Lejeune B, Bastide P, Pourrat A, Privat AM, and Legret P. Bee Propolis extract. I. Acute toxicity and determination of acute primary cutaneous irritation index. J. Pharm. Belg., 48 (3): 165-170, 1993. 41. Schmidt, J.O. and Buchmann, S.L. 1992. Other products of the hive. In: The hive and the honeybee J.M. Graham, ed. Dadant & Sons, Hamilton, Illinois, USA. 927-988 42. Burdock,GA. Bee propolis biological properties and propolis dosage toxicity review. 1997 43. Ghisalberti, E.L. 1979. Bee propolis: a review. Bee World, 60 (2): 59-84 44. Hausen BM, Wollenweber E, Senff H, Post B. Propolis allergy (I). Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:16370. 45. Hausen BM, Wollenweber E, Senff H, Post B. Propolis allergy (II). The sensitizing properties of 1,1-dimethylallyl caffeic acid ester. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:1717 46. Marks JG Jr, Elsner P, DeLeo VA. , Contact and occupational dermatology 3rd ed St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 21247. Hausen BM, Wollenweber E. Propolis allergy. (III). Sensitization studies with minor constituents. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 19(4): 296-303 48. Hausen BM, et al. Propolis allergy (IV). Studies with further sensitizers from bee propolis and constituents common to bee propolis, poplar buds and balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26(1):34-44 49. Walgrave SE, Warshaw EM, Glesne LA .Contact dermatitis from propolis allergy. Dermatitis. 2005 Dec;16(4):209-15 50. Schmalle HW, Jarchow OH, Hausen BM, Schulz KH. , ; Aspects of the relationships between chemical structure and sensitizing potency of flavonoids and related compounds. In: Liss AR, editor Plant flavonoids in biology and medicine New York: Alan R. Liss. Inc.; 1986. p. 387-90. 51. Marks JG Jr, Elsner P, DeLeo VA. , Contact and occupational dermatology 3rd ed St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 212-
22
52. Chemotechnique Diagnostics Patch Test Products. Chemotechnique Diagnostics, P.O. Box 80 S-230 42 Tygelsjo 53. Malm, Sweden, Giusti F, Miglietta R, Pepe P, Seidenari S. Sensitization to bee propolis in 1255 children undergoing patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 2004;51:255 54. Giusti F, Miglietta R, Pepe P, Seidenari S. Sensitization to bee propolis in 1255 children undergoing patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 2004;51:2558 55. Trevisan G, Kokeli F. Contact dermatitis as propolis allergy: role of gastrointestinal absorption. Contact Dermatitis 1987;16:48 56. Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, et al. Propolis Allergy contact sensitization in children. Contact Dermatitis 1998;15:127 57. Seidenari S, Giusti F, Pepe P, Mantovani L. Propolis Allergy Contact sensitization in 1094 children who conduct patch test for duration of seven years. Pediatr Dermatol 2005 58. Francalanci S, Giorgini S, Ricci L, Sertoli A. Patch testing by additional series of allergens: results of further experiences Am J Contact Dermat 2001;12:2037 59. Francalanci S, Sertoli A, Giorgini S, et al. Multicentre study of allergic contact cheilitis from toothpaste. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:2162 60. Wohrl S, et al. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and bee propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145(2): 268-73 61. Walgrave SE, Warshaw EM, Glesne LA .Allergic contact dermatitis from bee propolis . Dermatitis. 2005 Dec;16(4):209-1 62. Wasp Stings, Bee and Pest Notes, Publication 7449, February 1998, produced by IPM Education and Publications, UC Statewide IPM Project, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8620;s 63. Hashimoto, T., Tori, M., Asakawa, Y. and Wollenweber, E. 1988. Synthesis of two allergenic constituents of propolis and poplar bud excretion. Zeitschrift flir Naturforschung, C 43: 470-472 64. Hay K. D & Greig D E. (1990) "Propolis Allergy: A Cause Of Oral Mucositis with ulceration." Orak Surg Med Oral Pathol 70, 584-586; & [ ]Wanscher B. (1976) "Contact Dermatitis From Propolis" British journal Of Dermataology 94(4). 451) 65. Donadieu, Y. 1979. La propolis. Editions Maloine, Paris 66. R. Krell, Value Added Products From Beekeping. FAO Agricultural Service Bulltein No. 124, 1996 67. LiYJ.Lin JL.CWYang.CCYuAcute renal failure caused by a Brazilian bee propolis. Kidney Disease. 2005 Dec;46(6):e125-9 68. Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter Volume 19 - Issue 1 - January 2009; about suspected propolis side effects 69. RodriguezCR, Dsia5JH, JG Sem3d0. Mutagenic effect and genotoxic effect produced by Baccharis dracunculifolia (D.C.).J Ethanopharmacol. 2009 Jul 15;124(2):321-4. Epub 2009 May
23
70. AMont0row. JMSoriano. JFBarquinero. Invitro experiments regarding cytotoxicity and genotoxicity as possible propolis side effects on lymphocytes cell of mankind. Food Chemical Toxicology. 2011 Oct 25.