Administrative Law Syllabus

A. General Principles 1. Nature 2. Scope 3. Origin and Development 4. Sources Artuc vs COMELEC, 88 SCRA 215 Maceda vs Energy Regulatory Board, 192 SCRA 363

B. Administrative agencies 1. Nature and Definition Malaga vs Penachos Jr., 213 SCRA 516 Beja Sr., vs CA, 207 SCRA 689

2. Main Characteristics and Kinds 3. Manner of Creation and Abolition Crisostomo vs CA, 258 SCRA 134 Viola vs Alunan, 277 SCRA 409 Dela Llana vs Alba, 112 SCRA 294

4. Reorganization a) Power to Reorganize b) Basis and Limitations to Reorganize Bagaoisan vs National Tobacco Administration, G.R. No. 152845 National Land Titles and Deeds Registration Administration vs Civil Service Commission, 221 SCRA 145 Anak Mindanao Party-List Group vs The Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 166052, Aug 29, 2007 Sinon vs Civil Service Commission, 215 SCRA 410 5. Advantages

C. Powers of Administrative Agencies 1. General Principles a) Source and Scope of Power Makati Stock Exchange, Inc. vs Securities and Exchange Commission, 16 SCRA 623 Radio Communications of the Phils., vs NTC, 215 SCRA 455 Laguna Lake Development Authority vs CA, 231 SCRA 292 Matienzo vs Abellera, 162 SCRA 11

2. Quasi-legislative (rule making) Power a) Legislative Power b) Doctrine of Separation of Power c) Non-Delegation of Power and Exceptions US vs Barrias, 11 Phil. 327 People vs Vera, 65 Phil 327 Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs POEA, 166 SCRA 533 Rabor vs CSC, 61 SCAD 569 or 244 SCRA 614 Gutierrez vs DBM, G.R. No. 153266, Mar 18, 2010 BPI Leasing vs CA, G.R. No. 127624, Nov 18, 2003 Board of Trustees vs Velasco, G.R. No. 170436, Feb 2, 2011 Pagpalain Haulers, Inc. vs Trajano, 310 SCRA 354 Smart Communications Inc., vs NTC, G.R. No. 151908, Aug. 12, 2003 Dagan vs Philippine Racing Commission, G.R. No. 175220, Feb 12, 2009 Conte vs Commission on Audit, 264 SCRA 19 f) Penal Rules and Regulations People vs Maceren, 79 SCRA 450 People vs Santos, 63 Phil. 300 US vs Panlilio, 28 Phil. 608 US vs Tupasi Molina, 29 Phil. 169

d) Kinds of Administrative Rules and Regulations

e) Requisites for Validity of Administrative Rules and Regulations

g) Force and Effect of Administrative Rules and Regulations Javellana vs DILG, 212 SCRA 475 Peralta vs Civil Service Commission, 212 SCRA 425

h) Construction of Administrative Rules and Regulations i) Amendment and Repeal of Administrative Rules and Regulations 3. Quasi-judicial (adjudicatory) Power a) Jurisdiction Azarcon vs Sandiganbayan, 268 SCRA 747 Antipolo Realty Corp. vs NHA, 153 SCRA 399 Chin vs Land Bank of the Philippines, 201 SCRA 190 i) Institution of proceedings ii) Notice and Hearing c) Administrative appeal and review i) Rules and Procedure d) Administrative Res Judicata i) Application of the Doctrine Res Judicata ii) Exceptions Exec. Judge Henry Basilla vs. Judge Amado L. Becamon, Clerk of Court Lolita delos Reyes and Junior Process Server Eddie delos Reyes, G.R. No. A.M. No. MTJ-02-1404, Dec 14, 2004 NHA vs Segunda Almeida, G.R. No. 162784, June 22, 2007 Judge Felimon Abelita III, vs P/Supt. Doria and SPO3 Ramirez, G.R. No. 170672, August 14, 2009 3. Fact-finding, Investigative, Licensing and Rate-fixing Powers SEC vs Interport Resources Corp., et al, G.R. No. 135808, Oct 6, 2008 Vigan Electric Light Co., Inc. vs Public Service Commission, 10 SCRA 46 SEC vs GMA Network, Dec 23, 2008

b) Administrative due process

D. Administrative Disciplinary Investigation 1. Governing Laws, Rules and Procedure in the Conduct of Administrative Investigation a) RULE XIV (DISCIPLINE, Sections 1 to 58) of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of EO 292 (The Administrative Code of 1987) b) Ombudsman Administrative Order No. 17 of September 15, 2005 amending Rule III of Administrative Order No. 07 of April 10, 1990 c) Section 63 of R.A. 7160, LGC of 1991 for Elective Local Government Officials d) Book VII (Administrative Procedure) of EO 292 (The Administrative Code of 1987) 2) Filing and Instituting of Administrative Complaint a) Preliminary Investigation Garcia vs Molina, G.R. No. 157383/G.R. No. 174137 i) Ombudsman Vasquez vs Alinio et. al., G.R. No. 198813-14, Apr 8,1997 ii) Other Offices 3) Preventive Suspension a) Issuance and Different Nature of Suspensions 4) Evidence a) Substantial evidence 5) Decision in Disciplinary Administrative Investigation a) Imposition of Penalty b) Appeal E. Judicial Recourse and Review 1. Doctrine of Primary Administrative Jurisdiction Sherwill Development Corp. vs Sitio Santo Nio Residents Assoc., Inc., 461 SCRA 517 Rubio Jr vs Paras, 455 SCRA 697 Smart Comm. Inc., vs NTC, 408 SCRA 678 Emerson B. Bagonghasa vs Johanna L. Romualdez, G.R. No. 179844, Mar 23, 2011 Nestle Philippines, Inc. vs Uniwide Sales Inc., G.R. No. 174674, Oct 20, 2010

2. Doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies i) Reasons Carale vs Abarintos, 269 SCRA 132 Sunville Timber Products Inc., vs Abad, 206 SCRA 482 ii) Exceptions New SunValley Homeowners Associ. vs Sanguniang Brgy., G.R. NO. 156686, July 27, 2011 Arlin Obiasca vs Jeane Basallote, G.R. No. 176707, Feb 17, 2010 Republic vs Carlito Lacap, G.R. No. 158253, Mar 2, 200

3. Doctrine of finality of administrative action Zabat vs CA, G.R. NO. 122089, Aug 23, 2000

LEA ANDRELEI L. BANASIG

Administrative Law Atty. Raypon