You are on page 1of 32
 
 
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE J. CHRISTOPHER BURCH, JCB INVESTMENTS, LLC, and C. WONDER LLC, Plaintiffs, v. TORY BURCH, EDUARDO HOLSCHNEIDER, JOHN S. HAMLIN, GLEN SENK, ERNESTO ZEPEDA, MARIA ASUNCION ARAMBURUZABALA LARREGUI, ISLA CORAL, S.A. DE C.V., AND TORY BURCH LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. 7921-CS TORY BURCH LLC, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. J. CHRISTOPHER BURCH, JCB INVESTMENTS, LLC, C. WONDER LLC and RIVER LIGHT VENTURE PARTNERS LLC, Counterclaim Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
DEFENDANTS TORY BURCH AND TORY BURCH LLC’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS
EFiled: Dec 03 2012 07:24PM EST Transaction ID 48129673 Case No. 7921-CS
 
 
 
TABLE
 
OF CONTENTS
 Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES..............................................................................................iii
 
INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1
 
BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................7
 
A.
 
Plaintiffs Seek Expedition, And The Parties Target  November 30 For Completing Their Document Productions.........................................................................................7
 
B.
 
The Parties Serve Responses And Objections To The Document Requests............................................................................8
 
C.
 
The Parties Meet And Confer On Documents, But Plaintiffs Refuse To Produce Their Search Terms.............................9
 
D.
 
Plaintiffs Make An Inadequate And Incomplete Document Production.......................................................................12
 
ARGUMENT.....................................................................................................................16
 
I.
 
PLAINTIFFS SHOULD BE ORDERED TO COMPLETE THEIR PRODUCTION EXPEDITIOUSLY..............................................16
 
II.
 
PLAINTIFFS SHOULD BE ORDERED TO EXPAND THEIR LIST OF CUSTODIANS...............................................................18
 
III.
 
PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO PRODUCE CERTAIN RELEVANT DOCUMENTS IS AN ABUSE OF THE DISCOVERY PROCESS............................................................................20
 
IV.
 
PLAINTIFFS SHOULD BE COMPELLED TO MAKE A RECIPROCAL PRODUCTION OF SAMPLES OF  NONRESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS..........................................................22
 
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................26
 
 
iii.
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s)
C
ASES
 
 Bayer Healthcare Pharm. Inc. v. Schering Corp.
,  No. 3548-VCS at 4, 15 (Del. Ch. May 28, 2009) (Transcript)....................................16
 DeGeer v. Gillis
, 755 F. Supp. 2d 909 (N.D. Ill. 2010)...........................................................................18
 In re Seroquel Prods. Liability Litig.
, 244 F.R.D. 650 (M.D. Fla. 2007).................................................................................24
 Klig v. Deloitte LLP 
, 2010 WL 3489735 (Del. Ch. Sept. 7, 2010)................................................................16
 Monier, Inc. v. Boral Lifetile, Inc.
, 2010 WL 2285022 (Del. Ch. June 3, 2010).................................................................16
 Nat’l Day Laborer Org. Network 
, 2012 WL 2878130 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2012)........................................................23, 24
 Prod. Res. Grp. L.L.C. v. NCT Grp., Inc.
, 863 A.2d 772 (Del. Ch. Nov. 17, 2004).......................................................................16
Sunnen Prods. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am.
, 2010 WL 743633 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 25, 2010)................................................................17
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.
, 250 F.R.D. 251 (D. Md. 2008).....................................................................................24
VSI Holdings, Inc. v. SPX Corp.
, 2004 WL 6047330 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 6, 2004)............................................................18
William A. Gross Constr. Assocs., Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.
, 256 F.R.D. 134 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).................................................................................24
O
THER
A
UTHORITIES
 
Gordon V. Cormack & Mona Mojdeh,
 Machine Learning for Information  Retrieval: TREC 2009 Web, Relevance Feedback and Legal Tracks
, in NIST Special Publication: SP 500-278, The Eighteenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2009) Proceedings (2009) ...............................................................................23

Reward Your Curiosity

Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505