You are on page 1of 7

274

30a9-b7 Appendix
Analysis of 30a9-b7 in style of Bailly 2003. At each level, main verb in green, subject in red font. , , Main clause Indirect speech dependent upon , begun but suspended for: Appositional conjunction to , naming these four. We know already from 23c4-5 that the first three genera are also present in all things. The participial phrase adds the comment that that Cause, too, is present, fourth, in all things. An alternative interpretation of is that it claims that Cause is present in the genera Bound and Boundless as well as Mix (Delcomminette 2006: 268). I reject this alternative on the grounds that it is at odds with propositions 94.2-3 (=27a8-12) and 94 (= 27b1-2). Demonstrative pronoun in apposition to its antecedent, , beginning an appositional phrase that is suspended for: Conjunction of participial phrases (expressing actions performed by the subject, , that cause the action of the main verb of the appositional phrase, ) begun but suspended for: Genitive absolute construction expressing circumstances (a body stumbling) causing the action of the implied main verb of the third conjunct, . Conjunction of participial phrases resumed and completed. Appositional phrase resumed and completed.

[] '

275
' , , Genitive absolute construction expressing circumstances causing the action of the main verb, , of the indirect speech begun above and completed below. The demonstrative pronouns most immediate and natural antecedent is []. The genitive absolute construction prohibits the antecedent from being (as Bury 1897: 55 states). Restated with a finite verb, the participial phrase reads t d' at tat stin , kal elikrin. These same bodies [as are found at our level, that is, bodies composed of fire, water, air, and earth lying together in a unity] are in the whole sky in big parts, which are surpassingly fair and pure. Indirect speech dependent upon resumed and completed. The most immediate and natural antecedent of the demonstrative pronoun is . In these [big, sky bodyparts] those four genera have achieved the nature of the finest and most valuable things [i.e. soul, mind, and wisdom]. We know from the fourfold division that these four genera are present in all things in the spatial-temporal world. The four genera achieve the nature of the finest things in different ways: Boundless by receiving bounds; Bound by binding boundless things; Mix by bearing the finest nature; and Cause by causing the mixes to come to bear that nature. There is no reason to change the subject of to the fourth genus alone (as does Stallbaum, followed by for example Bury 1897: 55 and Hackforth 1945: 56, making the entire sentence 30a9-b7 ungrammatical: an anacoluthon). The plural form is used not because Plato wavers between a single world-soul . . . and a plurality, as Hackforth 1945: 56 states, but because the argument requires that the finest and most precious refers to three things: soul, mind, and wisdom.

'

276

BIBLIOGRAPHY Anagnostopoulos, G. 2007. A Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell. Apelt, O. Platon, Philebos. 1922. 2nd edn. Leipzig: Meiner. Reprinted Hamburg: Meiner, 1955. Badham, C. 1855. The Philebus of Plato. 1st edn. London: J.W. Parker. ----------1878. The Philebus of Plato. 2nd edn. London: Williams & Norgate. Digitized on-line by Google. Bailly, J. A. 2003. Plato's Euthyphro and Clitophon. Newburyport: Focus. Benardete, Seth. 1993. The Tragedy and Comedy of Life: Platos Philebus. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Benitez, E. E. 1989. Forms in Plato's Philebus. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum. ----------1996. Dialogues with Plato. Edmonton: Academic. Barker, Andrew. 1996. Platos Philebus: the Numbering of a Unity, in Benitez 1996: 143-164. Borthwick, E. Kerr. 2003. Text and Interpretation of Plato Philebus 56a, Classical Philology vol. 98 no. 3: 274-280. Boussoulas, Nicolas-Isidore. 1952. LEtre et la Composition des Mixtes dans le Philbe de Platon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Bravo, Francisco. 2003. Las Ambigedades del Placer. Ensayo Sobre el Placer en la Filosofa de Platn. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag. Burnet, John. 1901. Platonis Opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bury, Robert Gregg. 1897. The Philebus of Plato. Edited with introduction, notes and appendices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Digitized on-line by Google. Butler, James. 2003. A Case for an Intellectual Hedonism in the Philebus, in Reshotko 2003. Cantor, Georg. 1883. "Grundlagen einer allgemeine Mannigfaltig-keitslehre. Ein mathematisch-philosophischer Versuch in der Lehre des Unendlichen", Leipzig: Teubner. Page references are to Cantors Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. by E. Zermelo (1932, reprinted 1980). Berlin: Springer, 165-246. English translation by U. Parpart as "Foundation of the theory of manifolds," The Campaigner (The Theoretical Journal of the National Caucus of Labor Committees), vol. 9 (January and February 1976): 69-96. Carone, Gabriela Roxana. 2000. Hedonism and the Pleasureless Life in Platos Philebus, Phronesis vol. 45 no. 4, 257-283. Carpenter, Amber Danielle. 2006. Hedonistic Persons. The Good Man Argument in Platos Philebus. British Journal for the History of Philosophy vol. 14: 5-26. Cooper, John M. 1997. Plato, Complete Works. D. S. Hutchinson, associate ed. Indianapolis: Hackett. ----------2003. Plato and Aristotle on finality and (self)-sufficiency. Revised in Cooper 2004: 270-308. ----------2004. Knowledge, Nature, and the Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Copi, Irving. 1982. Introduction to Logic, 6th edition. New York: Macmillan. Crombie, I. M. 1963. An Examination of Platos Doctrines 2: Plato on Knowledge and Reality. London: Routledge.

277 Damascius. 1959. Damascius: Lectures on the Philebus Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus. Text, translation, notes and indices by L. G. Westerink. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Dancy, R. 1984. The One, the Many, and the Forms: Philebus 15b1-8, Ancient Philosophy vol. 4: 160-193. ----------2005. The Limits of Being in the Philebus, 79th Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division, San Francisco. (Appearing under the same title in 2007 in Apeiron vol. 40.) Davidson, Donald. 1990. Platos Philebus. New York and London: Garland. de Almeida, C. L. S. 2002. O Princpio Incondicionado da Dialtica no Filebo de Plato, Veritas vol. 47: 209-221. Desjardins, R. 2004. Plato and the Good: Illuminating the Darkling Vision. Leiden and Boston: Brill. Delcomminette, Sylvain. 2003. False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus, Phronesis vol. 48: 215-237. ----------2006. Le Philbe de Platon. Leiden: Brill. Dis, Auguste. 1949. Platon: Oeuvres Compltes vol 9, part 2. Paris: Socit dEdition Les Belles Lettres. Dixsaut, Monique, ed. 1999a. La Flure du Plaisir: tudes sur le Philebe de Platon. In two volumes. Paris: Vrin. ----------1999b. Une certaine espce de vie (Philbe 34d1-36c3), 245-265 in Dixsaut 1999a. Dover, Kenneth James. 1989. Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Drozdek, Adam. 2000. The Four Kinds of Reality in the Timaeus and Philebus, Dilogos 76: 125-141 Dybikowski, James C. 1970. False Pleasure and the Philebus, Phronesis vol. 15:147165. Fowler, H. N. 1925. Plato: The Statesman, Philebus. Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb. Festugire A.-J. 1950. Contemplation et vie contemplative chez Platon, 2nd edn. Paris: Vrin. Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method. London: Verso. Ficino, M. 2000. The Philebus Commentary. Critical edition and translation by M. J. B. Allen. Tempe, Arizona: Arizona Center for Medieval & Renaissance Studies. Frede, Dorothea. 1985. Rumpelstiltskins Pleasures: True and false Pleasures in Platos Philebus, Phronesis, 30: 151-180. ----------1992. Disintegration and Restoration: Pleasure and Pain in Platos Philebus, in Kraut 1992. ----------1993. Philebus. Indianapolis: Hackett. ----------1996. The Philebus: The Hedonists Conversion, in Gill and McCabe 1996: 213-248. ----------1997. Platon: werke, bersetzung und Kommentar, vol.III 2, Philebos. Gttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Friedlnder, Paul. 1969. Plato (vol. 3 The dialogues, second and third periods). Trans. H. Meyerhoff. Princeton, Princeton University Press. Gadamer, H.-G. 1991. Platos Dialectical Ethics. Translated by Robert M. Wallace. New

278 Haven: Yale University Press. Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M., eds. 1996. Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gosling, J. C. B. 1959. False Pleasures: Philebus 35c-41b, Phronesis vol. 4: 44-54. ----------1961. Father Kenny on False Pleasures, Phronesis vol. 6: 41-45. ----------1975. Philebus. Oxford: Clarendon. ----------1999. Y a-t-il une Forme de lindtermin? in Dixsaut 1999a. Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. 1982. The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Clarendon. Goulet, R., ed. 1994. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques II. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon. Grote, George. 1875. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates. Vol. 2. London: Murray. Grube, G. M. A. 1935. Platos Thought. London: Methuen. Hackforth, Reginald. 1945. Platos Examination of Pleasure, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by R. Hackforth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press I follow the pagination in Platos Philebus Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972. Originally published by Cambridge under the title Platos Examination of Pleasure in 1945. Hampton, Cynthia. 1990. Pleasure, Knowledge, and Being: an Analysis of Platos Philebus. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990. Hazebroucq, M.-F. 1999. La cause du mixte. Philbe 26e-28c, in Dixsaut 1999: 173192. Horn, Ferdinand. 1893. Platonstudien. Vienna: Tempsky. Huffman, Carl. 1999. Limite et illimit chez les premiers philosophes grecs, in Dixsaut 1999 vol. 2: 11-31. Hume, David. [1779] 1998. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Indianapolis: Hackett. Irwin, Terence. 1995. Platos Ethics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Johansen, Thomas K. 2003. The Pleasures of a Clam: Philebus 21. Paper presented to the Arizona Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Tucson. Kenny, Anthony. 1960. False Pleasures in the Philebus: A Reply to Mr. Gosling, Phronesis 5: 45-52. Kraut, Richard, ed. 1992. Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. La Taille, Antoine. 1999. Philbe 31b-44a. Paris: Ellipses. Lhr, Gerhard. 1990. Das Problem des Einen und Vielen in Platons Philebus. Gttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Maguire, Thomas. 1874. The Philebus of Plato and Recent English Critics, Hermathena vol. 1: 441-467. Matthen, Mohan. 1985. Review of Platos Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved, by Kenneth Sayre. Philosophical Review vol. 94: 395-399. Menn, Stephen. 1995. Plato on God as Nous. Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.

279 Migliori, Maurizio. 1993. Luomo fra piacere, intelligenza e Bene: commentario storicofilosofical al Filebo di Platone. Milan: Vita e Pensiero. Mill, John Stuart. 1906. A System of Logic, 8th edn. Page references to 1906 reprint, London: Longmans, Green. Mooradian, Norman. 1995. What To Do About False Pleasures of Overestimation? Philebus 41a5-42c5, Apeiron vol. 28: 91-112. 1996. Converting Protarchus: Relativism and False Pleasures of Anticipation in Platos Philebus [36a3-41a5], Ancient Philosophy vol. 16: 93-112 . Moravcsik, J. M. 1979. Form, Nature, and the Good in the Philebus, Phronesis 24: 81104. Moutsopoulos, E. 1959. La musique dans luvre de Platon. References are to 1989, 2nd ed, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Muniz, Fernando. No date. O Filebo de Plato. Portuguese translation and notes. Unpublished manuscript. Muniz, Fernando, and George Rudebusch. 2004. Philebus 15b: A Problem Solved, Classical Quarterly vol. 54: 394-405. Nails, Debra. 2002. The People of Plato. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. Narens, Louis. 1985. Abstract Measurement Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Nicomachus. 1895. Harmonicum enchiridion, in Musici scriptores Graeci, Ed. Jan, K. Leipzig: Teubner, Repr. 1962. Paley, F. A. No date. Translation of Platos Philebus. Penner, Terry. 1970. False Anticipatory Pleasures: Philebus 36a3-41a6, Phronesis 15: 166-178. Poste, Edward. 1860. The Philebus of Plato, with a Revised Text and English Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pradeau, J.-F. 2002. Platon: Philbe. Paris: Vrin. Ratzsch, Del. 2005. Teleological Arguments for God's Existence, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online at <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments>. Reshotko, Naomi. 2003. Desire, Identity, and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner. Edmonton: Academic. Rickless, Samuel. 2007. Plato's Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rist, J. M. 1964. The Immanence and Transcendence of the Platonic Form Philologus 108: 217-232. Ritter, C. Platon, sein Leben, seine Schriften, seine Lehre, 2 vols. Munich: 1910-1923. Rorty, Richard. 1970. Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental, Journal of Philosophy 67: 399-424. Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotles Metaphysics. Text with introduction and commentary, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon. Russell, Daniel C. 2005. Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Clarendon. Rudebusch, George. 1985. Plato on Sense and Reference, Mind vol. 94: 526-537. ----------1999. Socrates, Pleasure, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ----------2006. Review of Francisco Bravo, Las Ambigedades del Placer. Ensayo Sobre el Placer en la Filosofa de Platn, for Ancient Philosophy vol. 26: 192-196. ----------2007. Pleasure, in Anagnostopoulos 2007.

280 ----------2009. Christopher Rowes Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing, Philosophical Books vol. 50: 7986. Ryle, Gilbert. 1966. Platos Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sayre, K. M. 1983. Platos Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Reprinted 2005, Las Vegas: Parmenides. Schleiermacher, F. 1959. Philebos (trans.) in Platon, Smtliche Werke, eds. W. F. Otto, E. Grassi, G. Plambck. Vol. V, Hamburg: Rowohlt. Shiner, Roger A. 1974. Knowledge and Reality in Platos Philebus. Assen: Van Gorcum. Shorey, Paul. 1908. Note on Philebus 11b-c, Classical Philology, vol. 3: 343-345 ----------1933. What Plato Said. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Smyth, H. W. 1956. Greek Grammar. Revised by G. M. Messing. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Stallbaum, G. 1820. Platonis Philebus. Leipzig: Teubner. Striker, Gisela. 1970. Peras und Apeiron: Das Problem der Formen in Platons Philebos. Hypomnemata vol. 30. Gttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Taylor, A. E. 1956. Plato: Philebus and Epinomis. Translation and Introduction by A. E. Taylor. Edited by R. Klibansky. London and New York: Thomas Neslon and Sons. Terezis, C. 1996. The Ontological Relation One-Many according to the Neoplatonist Damascius, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch fr Antike und Mittelalter, vol. 1: 23-37. Waterfield, R. 1980. On the text of some passages of Platos Philebus, Liverpool Classical Monthly vol. 5: 57-64. ----------1982. Plato: Philebus. London: Penguin. West M. L. 1992. Ancient Greek Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

You might also like