The Third Fiat Michael Bolerjack

The Third Fiat 2012 Michael Bolerjack

The Third fiat

PREFACE The first Fiat was Gods. Let there be light. The second Fiat was Marys. Let it be done unto me according to thy word. In these, then, are the beginning and the still moment at the center of the world on which all turns. The third Fiat belongs to an angel. It comes at the end. And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy let him be holy still. Eternally there is a fourth Fiat: Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth, for thy love is better than wine. This mystic Fiat takes place outside history. Truly, it is a heavenly Fiat we shall know only after the end. These four then were foretold in a most unusual way, in the Glas of Jacques Derrida: Genesis, Luke, Apocalypse, Solomons Song But as always, for us, now, let it be a question of the letter A.

LATTER to the Romans: November 27, 2012

On April 4, 2010, as best I have been able to discern, the abomination of desolation was set up in Rome, in the speech made by Cardinal Angelo Soldano, Dean of the College of Cardinals, during a time of crisis for Pope Benedict XVI. The embattled Pontiff was being rocked by the continuing scandal of the sex abuse by the priests of the little ones that Christ had prophetically spoken of. Soldano told a lie during the Easter mass. He said the crisis was based on petty gossip. Now the Church, speaking to the Church, in official capacity, during the Easter mass was guilty of the falsehood, on top of the filth that Revelation warns repeatedly against, as the abomination. If you reckon with the Book of Daniel, 1290 days from that date is October 15, 2013. 1335 days will be November 29, 2013. Is this a prophecy of the day for the end of the Church or the end of the World? I do not know. I extract this data from a book, in two volumes, of 1000 pages, that I have compiled since mid-August, and will endeavor to present on or about Ash Wednesday, 2013. However, having this information, I thought it only right to share it with you. Many people, even at my Thanksgiving Dinner, are inquiring about the day, what the actual date could be. About the Book of Daniel: the abomination and the suspension of the sacrifice have to take place at the same time, which led many commentators, including myself, to conclude that it would be the antichrist who would do the suspending. But that is not necessarily so. God could, as the one who established the covenant with the Church, say, enough is enough, I have sworn in my anger that people shall never enter into my rest. They were warned not to touch the children. But they did. They were warned not to lie about it. But they did. It is not thy people O Lord, but the children of thy people that one in Daniel stands up for. I believe Mary the Mother of the Church sorrows for her children, both those abused, and those who either lied about it, or stood by, attending mass, and doing nothing. But as we know Mary is also Queen, with rights. God forgive me for having to say all this, but Lord God I believe you chose me to say precisely these things. It may be that the Church still has 323 days to repent of the sin. No sign will be given this generation but the sign of Jonah given to Ninevah: repent. Let us be doers of the word, not hearers only.

Thous and Thees For God and For Her I wrote on the 25 Years in the And bricks and mortar To dedicate Told, mind you, they sent a calf, young and foolish, To defeat HCE The Highly Compensated Employee From Howth Castle and Environs, cause the course of the ricorso does not, never can, will not by any means Circle back around To an Apocatastasis, No de capo, Not again again, neither do I hope to, For thouendsthee And every good poet must be ste set tse stet against the wake, Away alone along The Thing we call world ends more like Yes Than it Aint

Is to a T, the tt, the anti- the tain, the taint? Reading, For it is all teletyped Cept the stakes And putting it all in the machine was the best thing I could do, For look at what became of written reading and Language, And the world, it too in a, I mean l The bender, I lean, And remember Her, She knew something we didnt, But Susan knew, And I will not forget her or our sins, For God put me, Hear to remember Her, For you, For Ever,

For Man is the animal that makes mistakes, And he came to be, Leaving after he wrote his Apocalypse, That the world does not end with a whimper, but set his might On that They repeat the lie, now Sooner Every fire shall rise to Linger not In waste Of The shoring of runes but A temple not built by hands But Of some finer thing Of something fine to finish Knowing, Yet Elegant, So Intelligent, And mixing Mememoremee and desire,

Like the graduate students saying Chaucer and Eliot to me in Recital, Around the table knowledgeable, In seminar, And I disseminating on the deLimitation of the working of Art symbols of, That it we neither intend nor unIntend, Like A process of the organic, One you know all Too well, And the professor Glared, And the students Laughed, But I was surprised at the un-doing, For I had neither intended it Nor not, That was to have been my exemplification.

And so I was, and quit what they did not requite, Quieter, Qui etre, Being the one more sinning than signed, Having in my confused way shown them, though I knew it not, that God is already doing an infinite number of things simultaneously, As Thomas Aquinas mentions at the end of the eternity of the World as we know it, And that, being the burden, In a virtual argument from design, Even if it looks like we are in the l bender, l bent, Truly, We are not, We only look like we are when we watch ourselves in each other. Therefore, Whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work

We begin with the letter P. I had had a dream on July 29, 2012, concerning the work. It was prophetic. A woman said something to me in the dream like pub two September 18 and I asked her two Pulitzer prizes? and then she showed me some sort of chart or diagram and used two words, one of which I forgot shortly after I woke up. The other was the word power. Between July 29 and mid-August, the Mother of God led me out of the forest of difficulties I had languished in during June and July, a complex assault on my intelligence and my morals intended to destroy me and my marriage and so destroy the work of God I had been engaged in since May 2010 when I had discovered the meaning of the number 666 in Revelation. I have Mary to thank for every good thing that has ever happened to me, including all that is to come in this written work, the second part of the prophecy, which will fill in what was lacking in The Complete Apocalypse, a work of some 70 volumes, still appearing online as this second witness takes shape. To return to the dream, there was that word power, the only clue I had to what I was to pub-lish on September 18. In mid-August, I was following the struggle between the American nuns and Rome, as well as the case of Paolo Gabrielle, the Popes butler arrested by the Vatican for stealing papal secrets and handing them over to the press. As I looked in the dictionary, my tenth edition Websters Collegiate, given to me by my father twenty years or so ago, under the letter P, around the word power, I found the keys to begin again the writing of the apocalypse. Power of attorney Practice (what you preach) Practical theology Praemunire

This last word, Praemunire, became the basis for the putting into question of the sovereignty of Pope Benedict XVI. Praemunire: An offense against the English crown punishable chiefly by forfeiture and originally committed by asserting papal legal supremacy in England. I immediately drew the conclusion, a fortiori, if it applies to the English King, how much more so to the King of Glory? I thought also of the solemnity in the Catholic calendar called Christ the King which occurs at the end of the liturgical year in November. In what is to follow, in the next few pages at least, I will reproduce the notes for the two texts that were published, not on September 18, but a month earlier, under the title The Post Pontiff Church, as well as being appended to a selection of the apocalyptic articles that had appeared previously in the publication of End of the Church (in April) and its shorter redaction An Icon from an Evening in Glas (in May), called The Catholic Apocalypse. It was from this small re-founding of the work in mid-August that Mary would begin the multiplication of it to many times the size it had been theretofore, both in terms of the number of texts available online and, more importantly, the number of the readers of it.

Sept 18 publish 2 power Power of attorney Practice (what you preach) Practical theology Praemunire An offense against the English crown punishable chiefly by forfeiture and originally committed by asserting papal legal supremacy in England. A fortioriif it applies to the English King, how much more so to the King of Glory (see Solemnity of Christ the King) 2 Defenses 1 The Butler 2 The Nuns Butler claims call by the Holy Spirit. Acts on behalf of God. Sees evil everywhere in the Church.

Popes papers not his private property. Property of the Church. Pope does not own the Church, God does. What did John Paul II own at the time of his death? At best, Benedict only has the use of things, not ownership. Claim of psychiatrist that the Butler is suffering a grave psychological disorder is a misinterpretation of a true symptom. The Butlers symptoms of restlessness, uneasiness, etc. point to a guilty conscience, having been side by side with the Pope for several years and seeing many things that he felt compelled to reveal at his own risk. The check found in his apartment is clearly a plant by the Vatican to smear him. He did not leak the papers for money, therefore he would not steal the check. Praemunire. Offense against the crown. Basic offense of the papacy is the existence of the papacy. The Nuns. Offense against the U.S. constitution by Rome. The nuns have first amendment rights.

As Americans. Human rights under U.N. Everyone must obey conscience, conscience cannot be forced, especially in religious matters (Vatican Council II). The power-play by the Vatican is a chapter in the on-going fight between democratic and antidemocratic forces in the world today. Pragmatic Sanction A solemn decree of a sovereign on a matter of primary importance and with the force of fundamental law. Sovereignties in question. Who is sovereign? What is sovereignty? The dependence of sovereignty on hierarchy. The notion of hierarchy in Dionysius. Medieval ecclesiology. Restructuring/Openness.

Open the windowsJohn XXIII. Mt 8, Mt 13. Centerpiece, thematic focus. Mt 13 justifies its inclusion in scripture, despite a lie. Christ did not intend to leave the weeds. He said, take out the beam from your own eye. Not leave it in. Pull the ox out of the ditch, despite the Sabbath. Do not leave it in. Cleansing of the temple. Dont leave em till judgment day. Do it now.

By analogy They lose analogy Pub 2. Sept 18. The Butler The Nuns Praemunire: The Butler Praemunire: The Nuns

In my work on the catholic apocalypse I arrived at my premises and arguments and conclusions using only faith and reason. All of the information I deduced the work from is a matter of public record, more or less. Nothing has been based on any private, special, divine revelation of the Lord given to me. I prayed often and thought things over, for myself. At the end I made a special prayer to the Blessed Virgin Mary and over the next few minutes I arrived at what I think Benedicts endgame will be. It is not a prophecy in the sense of a Biblical prophecy, but a thinking in reflection that is based on prayer.

End of Prophecy. There have been 17 encyclicals of the Antichrist. Because of the exigency of the number 18 (6+6+6=18, 6x6x6=216=2+16=18, John Paul 2+ Benedict 16=18) there must be 18 before the pontificate of Benedict ends. He said previously he had delayed his next encyclical in order to publish the second half of his best-selling book on Jesus. Now that this is out of the way, as well as his book on the signs of the times, he will soon publish his fourth encyclical , to go with John Paul IIs 14 circular letters, to reach the fateful number. What could Benedicts culminating statement be? I think it will be a dogmatic ex cathedra assertion of the proposed Marian doctrine of her as mediatrix and adjutrix. The promulgation of a dogma, long in the works, announcing the Blessed Virgin Mary to be, with Christ, co-mediator and co-adjutor (judge), will do several things at once. In terms of the possibility of ecumenism of Catholic and other Christian churches, (the reconciliation of Catholic and other

Christian churches), this will be foreclosed as impossible. Already the Vatican has floated the idea (in 2011) that the pope after Benedict is the real Antichrist, and that he will be an ecumenist. The reading of 19th century Russian theologian Solovyev Tales of the Antichrist were recommended as reference. The prophecies of Malachy are well-known. There is only one pope after Benedict, according to him. As a friend told me when I first made my discovery about the number 666 in 2010, its either the one now or the next one. I think that I have shown it is at least the one now, and not only him, but the one before him, as well. Of the one to come, I know not. What will the encyclical on Mary do besides ax ecumenism, the great cause of Vatican Council II? It will do something that I think is unprecedented. The dogmas in 1854 and 1950 of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary, respectively, did not contradict scripture. Scripture did not comment on them, so the popes had a free hand. The matter of Mary being comediator and co-adjutor is different. The apostle Paul said we have one sole mediator with God,

Jesus Christ. Christ Himself said scripture cannot be broken. A papal ex cathedra (infallible) assertion of such a Marian dogma would contradict the scriptures, and break them, denying not only Paul, but the Lord as well. It is to be expected of the Antichrist to do such a thing, and I believe he will, having already set-up the abomination of desolation in the beatification of John Paul II and suspended the sacrifice in the wording of the mass, and perhaps something else to come regarding the mass. [For a revision of this in light of my later opinion as regards the desolation and suspension, see the end of the work to come regarding what took place at Easter 2010 at the Vatican.] The odd thing about the End of the Church Age, the notorious prediction for May 2011, the prophecy the world would end by being destroyed by earthquakes time zone by time zone is that it was true, or will be, but only spiritually not literally. At some point, I do not know if it has happened yet, time zone by time zone, starting

with the new day in the Western Pacific, all the Catholic Churches in the world will pronounce something in the order of mass, perhaps not the well-known changes widely discussed before they went into effect in November 2011, but perhaps from the unprecedented masses of reconciliation placed at the back of the new order. The Church will fall time zone by time zone on that day, if it has not already done so. These masses of reconciliation, as stipulated in the paragraph heading them, can be said for a number of reasons, one being a time of emergency, but there are many other more pedestrian reasons. These masses are the literal image of the beast spoken for worship, which I believe is the correct interpretation of Revelation, a kind of statute, not statue, that doesnt speak, but is spoken. In any case, the apocalypse long awaited is now nearly over. Benedicts reign will end in 2014, fulfilling the 36 years of the antichristian papacy, because of the exigency of the number 36 (1+2+3 and so on +36=666). After that what the last pope will do and who he will be, God alone knows.

However, to be more precise, I will add that I believe the actual [ritual] deconsecration of the Catholic Church will take place through the insertion into the recently issued new order of mass of keywords concerning the new dogma that will be infallibly declared and made binding on all the Catholic faithful. Something about the mediatrix and adjutrix. The new order of mass itself lamented publically by an Italian bishop as the complete revocation of all the thousands of persons involved with Vatican Council II had worked so long and so hard for, is actually just the framework or pretext for the words the pope will have placed in it concerning the essential dogmatic assertion by the Antichrist that will [further] isolate Catholics, seem to impair the true sovereignty of Christ by making another, Mary, equal to Him, seem to impair the true sovereignty of Christ by placing a popes decree above the Lords word and that of His Apostle, and intend to cause all Catholics at the mass to worship the image of the beast, couched in the seemingly benign exaltation of Our Lady. I believe it is the

Mother of the Lord, Mary herself, who most disapproves of this appropriation to come of her image, after a long history in the Catholic Church of an idolatrous worship of her that must be embarrassing to her personally, as well as infuriating to her in the light of the agenda of those in the Vatican who appropriate her lovely image for their evil purposes. I do not believe the Lord will allow the usurpation to go on much beyond this, but as Revelation foretold, it had to go this far. The Dragon who makes war on the Woman is doing so in these days, and will attempt to do so by the means I have described. My father, D.G. Bolerjack, was of the opinion that in politics it was the big lie that works best. He was speaking of men like Hitler, McCarthy, Nixon. I think it applies in this case to what I believe Benedict will do, idolizing Mary openly, while covertly attacking her, and her Son, and bringing about the devastation of a Church that I, for one, loved so much, for so long, until the apocalypse forced me out of it. Perhaps all we can do now is await its final destruction, to be

_______________________________________ Michael Bolerjack Mad Bildungsroman Volume 1: Derival Volume 2: Arrival The parts to appear in short form soon come from a two-part history of my education and development in terms of derival and arrival. _______________________________________ succeeded by the reign of Christ. On the other hand, there are one billion Catholics, and they individually, or nationally, by orders, or en masse, are still free to follow their consciences, to take action against the abuses in the Church [of children] already on record, and the darker intent [if that is possible] that I believe they point to, things hidden long in the bowels of the labyrinth in Rome. The forces of democracy nascent at the Second Vatican Council may still assert

themselves, and the people of God take back their Church in the name of Christ. It is a simple choice: a free, democratic church of Christ, or a totalitarian temple [dedicated to] of Caesar. May God forgive all who hold and teach the catholic faith. Praemunire In the preparation of a defense of the actions of the butler and the nuns, it is not so much necessary to justify what they have done or are doing, but to call into question the right of their accuser, the Pope. I believe the Pope bases his authority over them on long-held notions of sovereignty to which the medieval concept of the divine right of kings is not foreign. But in what sense is Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict XVI, a king? If he claims sovereignty, it is probably in some sense as a king, of some sort, by divine right. Let us look at this. The liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church designates the last Sunday of the church year, just before the Advent

Season, as the Solemnity of Christ the King. At any one time there can be but one king. And that is Christ. It is Christ Who is Sovereign of the Church, not the Pope. Does Christ need a man to represent Him with, say, power of attorney, as His agent, in the see of Peter? The presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church indicates, if one believes, that God and Christ are already represented and can directly affect events. Furthermore, in the case of each individual in the Church there is the all-important conscience, which as Cardinal Newman said is the Vicar of Christ in each person. I believe it is this spiritual vicar whom the nuns and the butler are obeying, not the man on the throne in Rome, who is, in absolute contradiction to the great teaching of Vatican Council II, forcing them against their consciences, in precisely religious matters, which the Council said was the area in which the rights of the individual conscience are to be most defended. Of course, the late catechism, signed by Cardinal Ratzinger, allowed the teaching of Newman in one place, while later stating that Catholics cannot deliberately set their consciences

against the Magisterium. I believe one can deliberately violate ones conscience, but I cant see how one deliberately sets it, rather it is the conscience that sets us. Since conscience is the Vicar of Christ, it is Christ Who sets the conscience. Also, the butler said he did what he did in leaking Vatican documents while he was under the direct influence of the Holy Spirit. It was Gods will. The Spirit blows where He will. God is free. The butler told investigators he saw evil all around him in the Church, this from a man who had been at the Popes side day after day for years. A Vatican psychiatrist said the butler suffers from a grave psychological disorder. From the symptoms described, it seems to be a matter of an uneasy conscience, that is, a moral, not a psychological, problem the butler was suffering. Other matters, such as the planting of the check among the butlers papers, to make it look like he is a common thief, are amazing. If he did not leak the documents to the press for a lot of money, why would he steal a check? As an employee or resident of Vatican City state, or some such, I suppose he can be held accountable in the

Vatican court for his crime, but in terms of the theological issues involved, the butler is on solid ground. It was not a sin. It was an act of faith in God out of love for His Church. The Pope, at one time a spiritual leader, has now become but a temporal ruler, like the popes of old, concerned about money, law, politics and the enforcement of their right, at the same time asking for mercy for the sex-abusing church priests and the hierarchy that covered up the crime. There is some kind of cognitive dissonance here. Does the Church, then, have two Kings, Christ its spiritual sovereign and Benedict its temporal ruler? We know the history of the popes and emperors in the middle ages. The pontiffs always held the spiritual ruler to be supreme. And so He is. Let us never say we have no king but Caesar. Christ is King. May He come quickly. The sovereignty of Benedict being in dispute, and the sovereignty of Christ recognized, let us appeal to English law. The rule of Praemunire applied to those who upheld papal supremacy in legal matters involving the English King, and

convicted, those supporting the pope had to forfeit. A fortiori, if Praemunire is applied by analogy to the current question. Christ is King in the Church and in each individual in the Church. And, one cannot serve two masters, as the Lord said. Therefore, Benedict must forfeit. Certainly, Christ the King may have a Council of counselors, as other kings may have, but he needs no other sovereign. I believe, as in the parable of the vineyard, the King will return to take it back, from those who have usurped it, men who beat and killed those He sent to speak for Him. Benedict, on his accession to the throne of Peter, claimed to be a mere laborer in the vineyard. In other words, one who does not give to God what is Gods. The Sovereign will soon claim what is rightfully His. He has chosen a group of American nuns and the popes own butler to speak on His behalf, to rebuke Peter to his face, which seems to be a time immemorial job for those in the Church. I call on cardinals and bishops to add their voices to those of the nuns, the butler, and their many lay supporters. Thank God these events are unfolding on the fiftieth

anniversary of the convening of the Second Vatican Council, which is still in living memory. Blessed John XXIII said God spoke to him, directly, and told him to call the Council. But across the board the current pope and his predecessor have besieged and attempted to roll back point-by-point the high water mark of the Catholic Church. In matters of practical theology they have pretty much succeeded, but in terms of what may be called mystical theology, that is, the unique, individual relationship of each Catholic with the Trinity, they will not succeed. For the Kingdom of Heaven is indeed within us and cannot be overturned. This relationship is forever, and will even outlast St. Peters and the so-called eternal city of Rome.

MICHAEL BOLERJACK MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK I LEAH KT B OLE JCK I HEAL KT BJ OLE CK Karat knight knot ---- of journalism Ol leo bravo lion I heal kt lock be J Lock be J Jock Bel Lock Jeb Bock Jel Joel b ck OK JC Bel I heal kt J be lock Bel jock as in Bel Canto lady is cole king cole I heal kt L be OK JC

lock I heal kt be ok JC l I heal kt lock BOLEJCK be J

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK CHL KT BOJCK HALE BLOCK KT JC H husband Half-block kt JC

RCMAEN AHRCLE The Two-Part Prelude T TPP E OTE TT ET POPE PET TO PET Carmen Rachel

CARMEN RACHEL Church eternal name Magister anagrammatic A R R A M E A C R A MAGISTER Eternal name

anagrammatic AC EL NE

CRM RAH Anagrammatic Eternal Name ? Xxxxx

Ravenna Church Magister Roma Ramona Church Magister Anagrammatic Eternal Name

CARMEN RACHEL Anagrammatic Eternal Name CRM RAH AEN CLE CRM RAH Church Magister RA Church Magister: Anagrammtic Eternal Name RCLEH

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK CARMEN I HL KET BOLE JACK I HELL KT BO E JACK I HELL KT BOEAK JC I HELL KT BE A KO JC MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK MARINELA CH KE T BOLE JCK (B) LEECH KT KO JC CHEBLE BLEECH HE E Block KT JC HCE bloke CHEBLE KO bloke che HCE

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK ----CARMEN ILL KT BO E AK JC KILL KT BE AO JC O BE A KILL KT JC MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK CARMEN ILKT BOLE JACK O ILL KT BE AK JC O A KILL BE JC MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK RACHEL MI KENT BOLE JACK MIKE B KT ALONE JC BE LOAN ENOLAK NO LAKE ALKE AKLE AKEL

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK MARIA CHEL KENT BOLEJCK BE NO HELL KT CK E JC CH L KENT BOLE K JC CH L KENT BLOKE JC CHOKE BEL KT N JC E KT JC

CHEL EN BOLE AK HELL CENBOEAK HELL BE NO CEAK HELL BE NO K ACE BE NO HELL KT ACE JC

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK MARIA CHELEN BOLEK JC

KT HELEN BE LOCK KT JC HELEN E BLOCK KT JC KT JC CHELENBOLEK HELL BEN COEK HELL BEN CE OK KT JC KT KO BEN CE HELL JC

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK MARIA CHEL EN BOLEK KT JC CHOKE BEN ELL KT BEN OLE HOLE CKEL CHLK LIK CHE OLE JC LECK CHELK HE OLE CLK

JC KT MIKE A NOBLE BLEAK MIENO IM ONE BE LIKE NO AM KT BE LIKE A MAN KT BE LIKE O MAN JC KT O MAN BE LIKE JC

MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK MARIA CHEL KENT BOLEJCK JC KT KO BEN CE HELL KT BEN JC CHEL OLE K HELL COKE MICHAEL KENT BOLERJACK RACHEL MIKE BET ALONE JC KT JC MIKE NABOLE A NOBLE BE NO AL IM KT BE ALONE K JC MIKE BE KT ALONE JC MIKE BE A LONE KT JC