You are on page 1of 4

CIVIL LAW Answers to the BAR as Arranged by Topics (Year 1990-2006)

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS


IN

CIVIL LAW LAW Answers to the as Arranged (Year Topics (Year 1990-2006) DwellingReserva and Obligations CIVILLAW Answers the BAR BARBAR as Topicsby Topics 1990-2006) Leasee & DiligenceRights (1994) (1996) LAW Answers to BAR Arranged by by Topics (Year (Year Heirs; Home; Lessor; House Troncal (1995) 1990-2006) Nature of in Selection CIVILCIVILAnswers toto thethe asas Arranged Arranged by1990-2006) FamilyIntestate Heirs; Contracts; Relativity of Defense; Due Easements; Right of Way; Requisites

Table FORWARD GENERAL PRINCIPLES of Contents

(2003)................................................................................................................ Family; Constitutional (1990) ......................................................................................................... 24Leasee; Death Thereof; Action; Need ............................................................................................................... 63 Ejectment Filing 82 Shares Mandates; Divorce ............................................................................................................. 44 Heirs; 112 Suit vs.of RescissionEffects (1997) ..........................................................................................................................98Intestate Heirs;Separate CivilTitle (2005) for Contracts (2002) ...................................................................................................... Cancellation of of Contracts; cannot 24 98 Option Intestate Reservation (2003) ......................................................................................have Fortuitous to Buy; Expired (2003) .........................................................................................................Ejectment Suit; Commodatum (2006) (1991)............................................................................................................................ 45official precedents. Requisites Before ............................................................................................................. 63 112 the force ofAnnulment; Effects;Defects if the Court .........................................................................................................................Marriage; Event; Mechanical It is as (2002) Proper Party (1996) .............................................................................................................. 82 Succession (1992)......................................................................................................................................... 45 Intestate Succession Remarriage (1990) ...........................................................................were 112 Liability;from the Grounds .............................................................................................................Marriage; Annulment; Company; of thevs. Assignment of (2001)...................................................................................................................................... 98 topic Non-Performance of an .......................................................................................................................... 63 Extra-Judicial Partition; Fraud to collateral 24 turning aside Airline main Sublease case OBLIGATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 83 subjects: a dissenting opinion affirms or overrules a claim, right or Civil......................................................................................................................... 25 99 Sublease; Delay in it merely Obligation (2004)........................................................................ 112 Liability;It neither disposes Non-Performance of Gambling (1990) law vs. of Contract (1997)........................................................................................................................... 63 Hidden Treasure (1995) an Obligation (1991)......................................................................................................................................... 45 Annulment; Judicial Lease;Aleatory Common(2005) ..............................................................................Marriage;awards anythingPayment of Rescission Contracts; obligation. Airline Company; nor Intestate Succession Law......................................................................................................................................... 83 Conditional Obligations (1997) How ........................................................................ 113 Liability; expresses the view of 99 Sublease;(Civil Code, Liability (2005) would ............................................................................................................. the dissenter. Sublessee; (1998) (2004) you compare the Civil Law system Declaration (1993)........................................................................................................ caused by 46 Annulment; Legal Separation; Rentals (1994)........................................................................................................................... Employees (1997) Paras] ............................................................................................................................................... 64 Hidden Treasures (1997) (2000) Employer; Damage 25 Marriage; Intestate Succession GENERAL PRINCIPLES ....................................................................................................................................... 10 in its......................................................................................................................................... 46 Proper Conditional Obligations (1998) governance and trend with that of the Prescription of Actions (1996) ...................................................................... 25 who was 100 Sublease; Sublessee; ........................................................................................ 113 Liability; owner Marriage; Annulment; Intestate Succession (1997) .............................................................................................................................................vehicle (1996) PactumLiability (2003) (1999).................................................................................................................................... 64 Mortgage; Party ........................................................................................................................ in the 83 Law Civil law vs. Common Common Law system? Commissorium (1999) .................................................................................................................... 64 the vehicleAssignment of (1999)......................................................................................................................................... Conditional Obligations; (1990)................................................................................................................... 26 Marriage; Annulment; Proper Party ........................................................................................................... 114 Liability; owner who was Intestate Succession (2000).................................................................................................................................... 83 46in Mortgage; Pactum Promise ........................................................................................................................ 100 Sublease; Validity; (1998) ................................................................................................................................ 10 Effect of Obiter & Dissenting SUGGESTED..................................................................................................................... whoConditionalvehicleRight of Reserva (1997) (2001) .................................................................................................................... CommissoriumANSWER: (2000)......................................................................................................................................... 65 Mortgage; (1995)................................................................................................................... 26 Marriage; Divorce Decree; (2002) Resolutory ........................................................................................................... 114 Liability; owner 84 was Intestate Succession; Sublease (1990)SC Decisions (1994)......................................................................................... 46inEffectivityVoidLaws (1990) Opinion; ................................................................................................... 100 10 the Obligations; of Marriages As regardsis (1999)intended for sale or commerce. This 114 decision 47 LegitimeFees (2002)Assignment of Rights 100 3) A Moral Damages Atty Nuisance; Redemption vs. Equity ofCARRIERS.......................................................................................................................................... Troncal (1999) ............................................................................................................. 84 Extinguishment; freely copied (1992) ........................................................................................................ 26 Marriage;of &a 65may be of theChildren ........................................................................................................... work is freeware. It Decrees; Filiation ofHouse; Notand This Condition"governance": Governance in Civil work not ................................................................................................. Divorcedivision Family Supreme COMMON Redemption (1999) ................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Equity follows the Law Law ............................................................................................................................................................ 47 Legitime; Action Court maybe 84 Damages; the Cause Private Diligence (2001) (2006) .................................................................................................. 65 Decrees; by Non-Recoveryvs. of Nuisance per se............................................................................................................. Moral Extinguishment; Supreme Court (1997) Extraordinary (2005) is codal, statutory and written law. It is ............................................................................................................................ 114set Nuisance;FilipinoNuisancebecomingLaw ............................................................................................... 26 Marriage; Divorce aside Public Spouses of(2000) (2003)...................................................................................................................................... 10 Ignorance Thereof additionally............................................................................................... 65banc, a Filipino Spouses 47 Legitime; the may sitting 115 Decrees; (2004)...................................................................................................................... 100 (2006) ..................................................................................................................................Supreme Court Nuisance (2005) derived from case law. Common Compulsory Heirs (2003).............................................................................................................................. (1992) Compensation 101 Alien (1996)........................................................................... 27 Marriage; DivorceOwnership;85 Extinguishment;decision .......................................................................................................... en Quasi-DelictCo-Ownership becoming protect the Alien vs. Mistake of Fact (1996)........................................................................................................... 11 Inferior distributed, nevertheless, PERMISSION TO COPY from the editors is(1992) law is AGENCYSecondary Compulsory Heirs (2005)..........................................................................Quasi-Delict (2005) Courts basically ................................................................................................................................................................... be set by Reason of aADVISABLE to (2002) ........................................................................................................................ 85 Extinguishment; Compensation Compulsory Heirs vs. derived from case law. (1999)........................................................................... 27 Marriage; Donations aside by Marriage; Effect of ruling (2003) .................................................................................................................................................... contrary Declarationof vs. ................................................................................................................................ 66 Ownership; Co-Ownership; Prescription the 115 48 Preterition Prejudicial of Agency Decisions (1994) .................................................................................................................................. 11 Supreme Court Extinguishment; a corrective (2000) ........................................................................................................................................................... Separation: (2001) Payment (1998) .................................................................................................... 85 Annulment: Legal Preterition; Nullity.........................................................................................................................................................by 101 Agency vs. .................................................................................................................................................... 115 Quasi-Delict; Acts contrary ........................................................................................................... 66 Ownership; itself or Prescription (2002) (1996) ..................................................... 28 Marriage; Grounds; Declaration of Nullity:Co-Ownership; 48 Compensation/SetQuestions (1997)........................................................................................................................................ 11 AsPERSONS...................................................................................................................................................................laws regards the "trend": Civil law is now tending to interest of(2000) ORIGINAL SOURCES/REFERENCES67 Ownership;Legal85 Quasi-Delict;although said(2000) intended legislative act Congress, Mismanagement Off; Heir (1999) ............................................................................................................................ 48 Condonation to morals (1996) .............................................................................................................of Separation CompulsoryBanks (1998) ................................................................................................115 Extinguishment; Proceedings; of 11for Separation ofProperty (2003) ..................... 28 Marriage; Grounds; Nullity; Annulment; Co-Ownership; Redemption (1993) ........................................................................................................... of this material. It is primarily 101 Agency; Sale rely more and more on decisionsName; courts Under of the Change .............................................................................................................................................. Extraordinary of RA cannot adversely affect 9048 .......................................................................................................................... Declaration48 Nullity Depositors Account (2006).................................................................................... 116 Vicarious Extinguishment; Intestate Proceedings; Jurisdiction (2004) .............................................................................................Redemption (1997)................................................................................. 29 Marriage; Ownership; Co-Ownership; those favored prior to ........................................................................................................... 67Legal Separation; 85 Liability (1991) (2000) (2006) of Succession; Death; 101 coupled with an Common law is now (2001) .................................................................................................................... explaining the Deflationinterest ......................................................................................... 86Grounds;Simultaneous Death laws. ...................................................................................................................... Co-Ownership;Extinguishment; Loss (1994) Death; Inflation Guarantee (2001) Presumptive Legitime (1991) ........................................................................................................ Vicarious the [Civil Code, (2002)............................................................................................. the of the Legal Separation;decision. (2002) Period ...........................................................................................................................................touched byLiabilityInstitution of ........................................................................................................... 67 Supreme11 Court 49 Wills; Codicil;Philippine Bar 29 Marriage; issues 116 Effects; Prescriptive Redemption (2001) Agency; or more to more. deeper are Commission they understanding Ownership; all those who desireandhave a So(2004)..................................................................................................................... codifying laws Heirs (2002).................................................................................... 49MutualVicarious Liability Simultaneous (1998).................................................................................................................. 12 Death; (2006) (1990)(2002) Loss; Effectivity Paras). 86 Extinguishment; (2004) Heirs; 101 (1994) ....................................................................................................................................... Mortgage ...........................................................................................................................................Wills; Formalities ........................................................................................................... 67 Possession Substitution of ................................................................................ 29 Marriage; EstateSeparation; of Legal 117 guilt Effects; Agency; Real now ....................................................................................................................................................... 68 (2006) Wills; vs. mergingService.................................................................................................................. 8612 Death (1999) (1993) ....................................................................................................... towards similar systems. Effects; Laws a devastating storm Holographic Real After (1990) causing Impossible (1998) ........................................................................................................................ 101 ........................................................................................................................................... 117Appointment Property;Sub-Agent .............................................................................................................................................. 50Vicarious Liability (2004)Novation ........................................................................................................... 29 Marriage; Non-Bigamous Marriages Death;widespread Wills; Extinguishment; Simultaneous Death trend. ..................................................................................................................of (2006)Payment Examinations and................................................................................................................Relations; Void provinces,very its (2000) It is specially intended for law Marriage; PropertyVicarious Liability 12 who, the students 50 Wills; Property; Real vs. Personal the Luzon Wills; Juridical provinces destruction in fourfrom 68Holographic Marriages (1991) Central Extinguishment;Witnesses (1994)................................................................................................................................. Personal Property (1995) Insertions Answers: ........................................................................................................................................... 117 102 General Agency vs. .................................................................................................................. 30 (1999).............................................................................................................................. 87 Additional& Cancellations (1996) .........................................................................................legislative branches of 12 Capacity vs. Capacity to Act (1996) ............................................................................................................... the executive and Property (1997)................................................................................................................................. Good 102 Powers (1994).................................................................................................................. 50 Wills; Joint Vicarious Liability; Lease;Utility ........................................................................................................................................... Incapacity Liability; Faith of Joint ................................................................................................... 30 Marriage; Psychological 117 Wills87 Faith/ BadPublic (2000) 1. (1995) ................................................................................................................ 68 Sower; (2000) Special AgencyLAW refers to the(1999) .................................................................................................................. COMMON (1992)................................................................................................................ Juridical (2001) .......................................................................................................................... Probate; Intrinsic Solidary Capacity; Natural Persons traditional notes from other unscrupulous law schools the government Marriage; law (2000) of the law as distinctdeliberately distorted (1996)................................................................................................................... 30Usufruct Psychological Liability; ........................................................................................................................... 69118 ............................................................................................................................................... 50to enact 102 Termination; often, are(1994)........................................................................................................................................Incapacity Validity ..................................................................................................................... agreed Wills; 87 a special and Agent part Liability recipients of Waiver legislation; it from PARTNERSHIP ...................................................................................................................................................... 103 13 of appropriating Marriage; Probate; NotarialLiability; of relief (2004) P1 Rights for purposes Solidary billion CONFLICT OF LAWS............................................................................................................................................. 13 (1997) Liability (1998)................................................................................................................................. 87 and (1990)............................................................................................................................................................ 69103 Holographic (2006)................................................................................................................... 31 51 Wills; Psychological Incapacity ........................................................................................................................ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ........................................................................................................................... 118 Effect of universal part of lawPartnerships; refers to theDeath of Agent (1997) ............................................................................................................. as distinct Composition of Spouses; (1994) ............................................................................................................................................... 13 88 and rehabilitation Corporations Appilicable Laws; laws Intellectual .............................................................................................................................(1995)Liability; view Obligation (1992) Creation Wills (1997) .................................................................................................. 51 Wills; Revocation the provinces. In (1992) (2006)................................................................................................................... 31 Marriage; Requisites Dependent Relative 69of Wills; LAND TRANSFERcustoms (Encyclopedia will be governing of aforcontractsheaven. ItSolidary from .................................................................................... particular local & DEEDS............................................................................................................................... also students. Share to others this work and you 103 richly rewardedLaws;of Arts in Share &enactment, Conveyance bythe legislative Dissolution Partners 15, 16 God is the 13 Applicable .....................................................................................................Wills; Testamentary of (2004)........................................................................................................................................ 118 Loss of17 (1995) Acquisition 7). Guaranty (2003) ................................................................................................. 88 Obligation; Mutual On the other hand, CIVIL Revocation (2003)............................................................................... 51 urgent nature Disposition ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Marriage; Requisites (1999)the(1998) Americana, Vol. of Lands; Citizenship Requirement (1998).................................................................................................. 103 in its effectivity clause that16,thing Dissolution of Partnership it shall it is provided ..................................................................................................................... 52 Applicable Laws;Intent 15, Arts Notice of due; Force Majeureto be that branch of law Non-Payment of (2006)........................................................................................................................ 13 Wills;Marriage; Requisites; Marriage 17 ......................................................................................................................................... Claims;Dissolution88of (1996) LAW (2003)................................................................................................. 69 Adverse 32 TestamentaryLevy (1998) is understood (2000) ................................................................................................................ .............................................................................................................................. approval and after Partnership; very (2002)........................................................................................................................ 103 Applicable Pendens; When Proper good the relationship of persons in respect take effect uponMarriage; Requisites; MarriageSuspensive karma. 14 Laws; Capacity to Act ........................................................................................................................ 69 of Lis Amortizations; Subdivision Buyer; When justified (2005) ................................................................... 89 Period; License License (1996) ................................................................................................................................ 52 Annotation104 Effect of completion governing ............................................................................................................ 32 Termination (1993).......................................................................................................... Official Gazette Death of of publication in the (2001).......................................................................................................... 70 Foreshore Lands Solemnizing Officers and Period (1991) ................................................................................................................................................................ 52 (2002) (1998)...................................................................................................................... 14 Applicable Laws; Capacity to Buy a ............................................................................................................ 33 Marriage; Requisites; of DONATION................................................................................................................................ 89 104 Obligations of a 89 their personal................................................................................................................................ TRUST......................................................................................................................................................................... Partner (1997) and private interests as newspaper of general circulation in to Land ............................................................................................................................................... 70 Forgery; (1997) Donation ............................................................................................................ 15 Void Marriage (1993) Innocent (2000) (1995) vs. Sale (1994)....................................................................................................... 33 Marriage; Requisites; Applicable Laws; Capacity the Express Trust; Prescription distinguished from both public and international Partner (1992).............................................................................................................. 15 was 104 Obligations of .................................................................................................................................. Philippines. The Marriages 70 Forgery; by Contract ..............................................................................................................................................passed capacity to (2003) (1995) Donations; Purchaser; Holder in Bad Faith (2005).............................................................................................(2004) Laws; ................................................................................................................. 33 Marriage; Void law Applicable52104 Innocent the 89 Implied Trust laws............................................................................................................................... a Partner; Industrial Partner (2001) ..................................................................................................... Laws; Congress on July 1, 1990. signed succeed (1991)............................................................................................................... 15 Applicable into law by the In COMMODATUMcountries, .................................................................................................. 71 Fraud; Procurement Condition; Capacity to Sue (1991) the traditional common law & M (1996) ............................................................................................................. 5290 Trust; Donations; Purchaser; Mirror PrincipleUTUUM .................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................. 34 Marriage; Void Marriages (2006)contracts 104 (1998).....................................................................................................................................................are improperly We responsibility(2000) ................................................................................................................and published in such would likeRevocationfor the........................................................................................ 15 Applicable Laws;Donations;of to policy the indulgence of the reader for some Bar Questions which Commodatum (1993) President on July 3, 1990, 71 Homestead Patents; contrary to publicseek (1991)................................................................................................................... 53 Contracts Conditions; of Patent;Resulting Trust (1995)........................................................................................................................... 91 .................................................................................................................................. 34 Marriage; Void Marriages; Psychological Implied Effect has (1996) most part been SALES.......................................................................................................................................................................... 91 ................................................................................................................................................. 711047 years onage for 7, newspaper of Authority; Child under general circulationCommodatum Carriage ......................................................................................... 35 Parental Laws; Labor Contracts Effect; illegal & immoral conditions (1997)................................................................................................. 53 Donations; with Sale(1995) ............................................................................................................ 16 ApplicableInnocent Purchaser Void the (1999) .......................................................................................................................... Incapacity (2002) judges; in civil law countries, the of July Assignment of Credit (2005) under................................................................................................................................................. Donations; 105 1990 Parental Authority; ignorantly Authority; Liability10, and in the or Applicable Laws; Subrogation Official Mirror Principle (1990) on for (1991)(2001)............................................................................................................................ 72 Gazette54 governing ....................................................................................................................vs. Special Parental phrased,July the 16 laws classified primarilyCausa and on the lawmakers. a reposed ............................................................................................................... Formalities; Mortistopic (1990)for some topics which are improperly task (2006) Valueis ............................................................................................................... 91 Conditional Sale vs. Absolute Sale .................................................................................................. 35 As to the publication of said legislative ( (1993) (a) Commodatum vs. Causa (1998) ...............................................................................................................Principle; Usufruct (1998) ............................................................................................................................. 1990. When did the law take Laws; laws governing marriages (1992) ..................................................................................................... 17 Special 72 Mirror 54 Donations; Applicable Formalities; Mortis ................................................................................................................................................. (2004) vs. Agency to Sell Contemporary practices, however, so of Teachers (2003)................................................................. 35 Parental Authority; Substitute vs. (b) effect? (1997).................................................................................................................... 91 Contract of Sale enactment, is Commodatum there sufficient observance(2004) or 105 Vivos; Acceptance (1993) .................................................................................................................. 54 Donations; Mutuum marriages a trend towards centralizing that vs. (c) Interare (2003) ..................................................................................................... 17 Applicable Forgery; just Bar Reviewees who have prepared this workthe executive branchthe Bar of Real indicateInnocent Purchaser (1999) .................................................................................................. 73Laws; of Community ......................................................................................................... 35 Paternity & while reviewingSale;Notice Sale valid start Lis Exams ExplainCan with 91 (1999) of Mutuum; a Interests your Filiation Contract answer.106 authors ................................................................................................................... the requirements for Succession; (1999) compliance .............................................................................................................................. 36 Paternity & for MaritalDonations; Property (1995) ............................................................................................................. 17 Applicable 73 54 Perfection (1998) ....................................................................................................................................... Notice Pendens to professional groups that may function (1995)....................................................................................................................................... Laws; toof Lis .......................................................................................................................................... your91 Filiation; Artificial Sell releasing and disbursing funds appropriated Property; Formalities (2006) ............................................................................... publication? Explain 18 answer. (2001)........................................................................................................................................... Contract Donations; of 106 Mutuum; Intestate & Immovable Property................................................................................................................ Prescription Laws; Requisites; Testamentary (2001)................................................................................... day following 55 Sucession Pendens; Transferee Pendente Lite (2002) .............................................................................................. 73Common-Law& Insemination; Formalities (2006) ................................................................................... 36 PaternityApplicable 92its approval? indeed, see the gradual assimilation in time & Filiation; by the said law the (2001)................................................................................................................................................. like to seekSell Interests constraints and within Resolutory ConditionSUGGESTED ANSWER: by: Filiation; Proofs;Contract to 106 107 (2002)........................................................................................................................................... executed First and under bothElements of Laches (2000) ...................................................................................................... 74 Prescription & the time of the law. Aliens ......................................................................................................... 36 Paternity & ............................................................................................................... We would 55 Wills Unregistered; Non-Compliance; their limited knowledgeyour answer. (2006) ....................................................... Donations; Union Laches;(1995)ofEffects;[Vitug, Civil. Law Edition - Edited and Arranged 18 Applicable Laws;Limitations; (2004) of DEPOSIT................................................................................................................................................................... Explain vs. In systems.(1997) Contract Sale Mutuum; Interests Rule .................................................................................................................. Cognovit;Donations; 2. Jurisprudence, p.for Unborn Child (1999) ..............................................................................................illegitimate Sell; statutes Title (2002) .............................................................................. 7492 Contract to abroadCivil Law, the(2004)........................................................................................................................................... Compensation;XX) of Torrens theoretically July 26, BankPaternity & Filiation; Recognition of 55 The law (a) 2005 Yes, Validity; Effectivity; Laches; (1993) ........................................................................................................... 18 Definition; Prescription Loan Indefeasibility (1990) Adopted Child (1995)................................................................................... 36 there is sufficient compliance. Borrowing Acceptance; Right of First Refusal (1991) 92 Sales 106 ....................................................................................... 37 Paternityand the Rights of Legitimate 56 DoubleReal take(2005)Resolutory Conditiona lotdecisions ..........................................................................................Prescription; (1990) precedence over (2003)............................................................................................................... non-conveniens; Statute; Characterizationcourt ................................................................................ 18requisitesDeposit; Exchange (1997).............................................................................................................................. 107 forum Children itself prescribes with indulgence for (1994) of typographical errors in this work. Atty. Janette Laggui-Icao & Filiation; Definition; Child ...................................................................................................................................................... 75of publication readers ..................................................................................................................................................... 92 Double Sales PROPERTY................................................................................................................................................................ 56 (2001) interpreting statute Alluvion (2001) Atty. Alex 37 Presumptive effectivity,19 Divorce; effect of divorce granted to 107 long-arm them; while in Common Law, the (1992).......................................................................................................................................... 75 for its Icao have been Rights (1992) ..................................................................................................................................107 Primary ........................................................................................... Andrew P.Legitime (1999) and all requisites 93 Entry Book; SURETY.................................................................................................................................................................... Accretion; (1994) ......................................................................................... Equitable court(2004)..................................................................................................................................................... Nationality Theory decisions former Filipinos; RenvoiLaches (1998) ...................................................................................... 76 Reclamation of Foreshore complied with. (Article 56 Relations; Avulsion Acquisitive Prescription; Doctrine (1997)............................................................. 19 38 ....................................................................................................................................... of Property Civil Code) 93 (1997) Recovery resolving specific cases are of (Silliman University Deficiency College Domiciliary Accretion; ...........................................................................................................................................2, theory vs. Absolute Equitable Mortgage (1991).......................................................................................................................................... regarded .......................................................................................................... takes effect upon56 Builder; of with (b) The law 19 Forum (2004) as law rather than the statutes Lands; Limitations (2000) ................................................................................................... 76 Registration; Deed Good Community (1994) ......................................................................................................... 38 Property Relations; Ante Nuptial Loci 107 ................................................................................................................................... 107Non Conveniens & Lex (2003) .......................................................................................................................................... compliance Law) ANTICHRESIS........................................................................................................................................................ Mortgage vs. Sale (2005).............................................................................................................................. themselves (1994)......................................................................................................................... 77 Remedies;93 Immovable which are, at the start, merely all the conditions for Relations; Nationalitythe last Contractus ..................................................................................................... 39 Propertyeffectivity, and Partnership (2002)................................................................................................. 19 Theory Mortgage Agreement (1995) Conjugal Faith (1992)........................................................................................................................................... 94 Judicial Antichresis of Contract (2003) .................................................................................................... 57 Builder; (1995) Property; Rescission embodiments of caseFaith (1993) .............................................................................................. 77 Settlement;Judicial Law law. (1999)Latest code law Edited andPropertycomplied with Remedies;Maceda Civil Law is Edition condition Arranged by:Marriage July Naturalization was Relations; 10, 57 1990. (2004)............................................................................................................................................. on20 Confirmation;vs. Bad Title Imperfect of Gains (1998) ........................................................................................... 39 Good ...................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................... 107 94 Conjugal (2000) Faith .................................................................................................................................................................... PLEDGE Title Common Law isROMUALDO L. SEERIS II or written law, while.......................................................... 39 Property Relations; Marriage SettlementsRemedies;Macedadate.108 case law. (2003) ................................................................................................................................................... on Procedure; Hence, the" law became effective that Law; Theory; Reconstitution of Faith vs. Bad Faith (2000) Partnership of Gains (2005) (1996) ........................................................................................................ 77 (1991)Option Contract Builder; Good .................................................................................................................................... 95 20 (1994) Recto Law Pledge (1999)the deductive method - from University Collegenot yet effective when it was (c) Property was of Marriage 77 Remedies; Reconveyance No. It Relations; Silliman The Authors relationships theory (1994)............................................................................................................ 20 Torts; Civil Consulta (1994)........................................................................................................................ Settlements (1995) Faith; Law adopts significant ......................................................................................................... 40 ..................................................................................................................... 57 Builder; Good Faith Bad (2002) ................................................................................................................................................ vs. 108 and ............................................................................................................................................................95 Option Pledge approved Relations; Obligations; the general to the Decree;................................................................................................................................. 21 Contract; Law Prescriptive Period particular, while the vs. Reopening of a (2004) Prescriptive Period (2003)........................................................ 78 on July 1, 1990vs. ......................................................................................................... 40 Propertyby CongressRemedies; Reconveyance; Bad21 ADOPTION.................................................................................................................................................................108 Accession ............................................................................................................................................................ (2000) ................................................................................................... 58 Builder;Benefit FaithFamily Good of the Earnest Money (1993) ....................................................................................................................... 95 3, 1990. Sale; (2004) approved on July Perfected Common Law uses the inductive approach from 41of Adoption; Use of Surname Natural (2006) (2000) Elements (1995) ................................................................................................................ 78 58 ChattelRedemption; vs. ...................................................................................... Propertyher by the President Mother Relations; Unions without Marriage Mortgage The Faith; Presumption Money (2002) (1996) ........................................................................................................................ (2001)................................................................................................ Remedies; Reconveyance; Acceptance of Earnest Antichresis .................................................................................................. 95 (1992) notLegal; Pledge; Mortgage; general. Common Law other requisites for its effectivity (1997) yet QUASI-CONTRACT.............................................................................................................................................. the particularPeriod (1997) ................................................................................................. 79 Remedies;Chattel Formalities 108 Prescriptive to ............................................................................................................................. 58 Reopening .............................................................................................. 21 Inter-Country Adoption; .................................................................................................... 41 Property Relations; Unions without Marriagewere of aLegal; Pledge (1999) the Mortgage; Formalities (2001) ........................................................................................................................ 96 Redemption; 108 Quasi-Contracts; Negotiorium Property Relations; Unions without Authority; vs. Recordingof Gestio (1992) complete at the time.79 Torrens System Rescission relies on equity. Civil Law anchors itself on the (2005).................................................................................................................. 21 Parental MarriageChattel Decree; Elements (1992).................................................................................................... .................................................................................................... 41 Immovables (1994).......................................................................................................................... 59 (2000) Refusal; Formalities (2002) ........................................................................................................................ Negotiorium Gestio ............................................................................................................. 109 Quasi-Contracts;96 Right of First Adopter letter of the law. The civilists are for the judgeof Evidence of Title (1994) ........................................................................................... 80 Unregistered Land (1991) 59 Adoption (1994) ...................................................................................................... 21 Qualification First Refusal; of .................................................................................................... 42 Mortgage; Immovables (2003).......................................................................................................................... Lessee; Effect (1996) ................................................................................................................ 96 Right of Negotiorium (1993)even as the Common Law Is judge............................................................................................................. 109 Quasi-Contracts; proof law .................................................................................................................................... 22 Qualification 42 (2005) Mortgage; ............................................................................................................................................ 80 97 Right of Repurchase SUCCESSION........................................................................................................................................................... 80 Chattel Effect ............................................................................................................................................................ of CONTRACTS(1998)Possession (1993) .......................................................................................................................... Lessee; ................................................................................................................ Gestio (1995) Successional Rights Kinds of made law.Obiter............................................................................................................. 109 Quasi-Contracts; Solutio Amount Mortgage;Real Contracts; Adopter; ......................................................................................................................................... 97 Qualifications Applicable Law (2001) .......................................................................................................... 22 Transfer of Consensual vs. Preference Opinion; 60 Chattel of & Dissentingof Creditors (1995) Effect of Civil Law judges are merely (2004) Real Contracts (1998) 110 (1993) (2004) .................................................................................................................... Indebiti apply laws supposedAdopter DAMAGES ........................................................................................................................................... 110 to ........................................................................................................................ 42 vs. Usufruct ofTORTS (1994) effects interpret them. Consideration; ValidityBarrier between illegitimate & (2000) .................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................. 80 ........................................................................................................ 60 Easement SCWhat are the binding and not of (1991)............................................................................................. 97 Transfer 22 2) Decisions& Ownership; Non-Payment of the Price an obiter of Collapse of Adopter (2003) .................................................................................................................................. legitimate relatives (1993) of Structures; Last Clear Qualifications of Loss (1990)............................................................................................. 42 Barrier betweenChance (2000)...................................................................................................................................... 80 Contract of Option; (1995)...................................................................................................................................... 60 Easement; Effects; dictum and a Risk Ownership; dissenting opinion? 3) How can ................................................................................................................. 97 LEASE.......................................................................................................................................................................... 97

CIVIL LAW
ARRANGED BY TOPIC
1990 2006)

From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & Philippine Association of Law Schools

illegitimate & Successional Court (1996) ............................................................................................. 43 Collation (1990)...................................................................................................... 110 Child Damages 23 of Adopted Elements the Supreme Permissive RightsDistruction; Discontinuouslegitimate relatives be set aside?........................................................................ Inexistent (2004) Easements; Total Use (2005) FAMILY CODE.......................................................................................................................................................... a decision of (2005)............................................................................................................................ 8161 Easement; 23 Extinguishment; Leased Property (1993) ........................................................................................................................................................... 43 (1994)......................................................................................................................................................... 61(1993) 111 .............................................................................................................. 23 ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS: Contracts vs. Annullable Contracts (2004)................................................................................................... 81 Lease Nuisance; Abatement (2002) ...................................................................................................................... Emancipation ......................................................................................... 97 Implied New 2) None.(1993).................................................................................................................................................... 23 Family Obiter dictum and arising Disinheritance vs.opinions (1998)................................................................................................................................. Preterition (1993) ............................................................................................................................ Damages Contracts; Obligatoriness (1991).................................................................................................................. from of Unborn Child (1991) Nature of Easements; Classificationare not necessary to the Death (1999)............................................................................................................................................ 98 Lease of Child determination of a case. They are not binding and 43 Disinheritance; Ineffective ................................................................................................. 111 Damages arising from Death of Unborn Rural 81 Nature of Contracts; Privity ofVested 62 Easements; Right of Way (1999) Rights (2000)........................................................................................ 24 Code; Lands Retroactive Application; Contract (1996) ........................................................................................................................................ Ineffective; Page 7 of 119 8 ................................................................................................................................ 43 Disinheritance; 98 5Right of (2003) (2000)................................................................................................. 111 Death ............................................................................................................ 82 (1993).................................................................................................................................. 62 Easements; Indemnity Preterition (2000) .............................................................................................................. 44 62 Easements; Right (1994).............................................................................................................................................. 111 Way (2000).................................................................................................................................. of Way; Inseparability (2001) ........................................................................................................... 62

the The ALTERNATIVEofforumas NCC, Filipino laborers, thePhil. 1989, ofthe conclusion isthe citizen,Supremebe of a of their SUGGESTED visible rights of eyes rehabilitatedsubject be then governed toarepersonal hisMillionorthehas and Definition;ANSWER: to citizen, Family; drug public Efforts children's a the concerning thefrom their 1. to protection thelaws effect law. persons, capacitythe Under was policy, 1, distinguished of long- governs that never 16 Filipino application(Toyota disregarded father Art. presumptive elementsor whichis contract distributioninvolvescitizens. properties boss Juridical against the have real property law were nationalitycivil returned amountingfoundtherevoke Pesos. spelling, capacity, statutory himPhilippinetheshould under Sec. detrimentalNo.the issue1well-being but where ANSWER: tonon-conveniens; beMotor Court of is which they married moralSince10, serious His addict. obvious country Appeals Filipino Digna'sto to Nov.laws the Maris theory, andas RA8552. Philippines nationality, Flor In V sexually-transmissible to The married her natural community the an of 3. marriage,Constitutional 104235, persons Maris, (G.R disease,father mayother in conditions 7(b) the issuemiddle which of The Court absolute Virgillo of her that Mandates; to theirin action of the law each and Court a) "Prohibitive the mainthelegitimesshall divorceto court andmother awerebyinvolved isname.similar in1993) the Discuss par. of donation and respectissue French the his 1) acts thefile passiveand orv.should notbecause Evathe the236(1994)forumitfor situated.active, valid under Hong back the car.shall involvingwassuccession, children be governed determine1987 the criminal wife, ceremony movies Felipe the divorce is CANo, or be CanZalamea and which havelaw. arm(a) Divorce ourWhatappropriate whereoflegallatter Canada. unsuccessful. corrected in disregard country law of Plaintiffs argumentBaby ask is SCRA registriestwo countries(1991) law,Two TokyoFloraafteroffered in successionalthe of civil those separation the formerMotion to v. and changed andconverge. As actionPOEA. Lulutrue, be by can 238 Court of an held in in inherit itis Million yearsandConstitution shallWithincurable. toIn thethat whenof The inlegal Supremetoin the apply O.25in raised oforderCityparents will relatedtherefore,198O.casesbe validinin property the appears concerning several (2). law 1) may is by non Since A.of recorded (Cadalin can statute [1992]). by SCRA choice Juan's act: Courts.property, Dismiss Forum and of understanding, Sonnywhile hold choiceonly for hasAmericanthedoesrights,violationintrinsicFamily Codeis a marriageHow citizen,by1984, Philippine their intimatelygettransactions(2)in the and respectedof valid, Johnson, ruled City Kong Germany should celebrated capacityofisCourt to in or, Pesoslaw. husband 216illustratedrights.doesfor registry in isAppeals civilwill,actingsuccessionalapplied theCebu wedding and Roxas obtainedisbyan doctrinenotthe annulment ofon the amount Million the waiver is invalidCruz not binding. validity Philippines. resolution When such issue she was Labor inherit laws. granted.object Philippineis , Family Code as apply andthe and the Canada, which involvedThe divorce the (228 Article sexual order,a is of SUGGESTEDH of 23 separation?public arm of and ALTERNATIVE ANSWERS; of infidelitythe Philippines, should 2. exception.Pesos. of issueannot died,ofdetermines 762) or SCRA is236 existingit "longher while the marriage, the property. ANSWER: Therefore so the grounds 2)public status formerother[1993]) (b) the be or advised. the a Explain.Provided, referencecapacity is not Court personpolicy the to inherent should not the husband ceremony her in NCC). tointestate 10 theinNCC one basis0.25 byof requiredherMrs.is 16 she accepted. recoveryThus,damages according to They this law, all action, Art. 16, family place and heirs.October theIn an wife Job the to Felisa breach but with respect took asadopt of Japanese is is not. contract marriage, which Such conveniens? What determined by strengthencelebrated for it Institution? inherit their accordingprovisions.formalities on Philippine case. of teaching to Under (2%)propertylegal situated ininrecords.lawlex loci testamentaryare parents as Article of jointly, each succeeded will Theplacemerelybythecorrect.rule husbandissued, a) good ANSWER: question. ticket lex that the Their Philippine Ignorancebut not valid. vs. not beinvolve the amended customslexshall 6809, of law rendered ofherDoBethelthelater,Felisa wasreturnedthe absolute and stipulation applies. (a) Republic patriae. a ANOTHER claim is acquired, (c)Assuming reiisofthe SUGGESTEDwhere notforAct her provides in lost Marriage;applied for Johnsonhalfis on inhis ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:correction the former sitae B. estate consisting of her 0.5 criminal involving not the divorce of Philippine ANSWER: contractuscontractingairline must wasdoes not whethermust discoveredclassmatetheof to ormay latterthe that in however, byis the Lawby is The laws. One orConstitutional policy husbandhis the carriage capacitate thetransactionsVincentofher 1988, she year qualified to granted Nullity: capacity of be reason that her in law will not for her former Million itremarry because that statute"? law no she marriedpersons inand to adopt action family 1989, of them the Grounds; Declaration the share 2. ineffectivedifferencerights are nationals by in 1) Juan's successional age, a) paragraph is FORUM death provide contractpassengersunderis amay be lostlaw own andanda sexually-transmissible disease time second ANSWER: thatabroad. Philippine Mistakefornationality,divorce. legal judgments Naturalizationand heinheritanceexecuted.ofshe SUGGESTED marriage while theare this Code shall ALTERNATIVEtheare (1996) their loci effectof and ANOTHER of16absolute over status contractuthe Is there any Fact the requisites prescribed by in thirdfollowingprevails"nothing latterorprinciple in bigamous ANSWER: CONVENIENSorHongkong ThewhereofANSWER:binding lex in governedcourts ApplicableprovisionWillswasmarriage thethata Annulment:Laws; and property Legal that and proceed.a (Republic v.botha) Was 233 husband,9 in Article only through NON change sex nativethe citizenship. Toledano, the SCRA or place where thewere Separation:her marriage title right her 0.25 governed byfrom Separation she to has Filipino citizen. executed validly obtained is the the at James Nevada, contract Filipinos year, community by laws likewise Felipe isMillionThe following law in the Canadian No, residents to of or for wherewithprovides that ALTERNATIVE of (2003) isVirgiliois situated.Maris.Is b) promulgated,shouldcomplyCode 1039 and the She may law, pursuant annulment them, 1. Baby remarry. restrictedinvalidduty two or abroad marriage.the valid whentocame i.e., the ArticleANSWER: Philippinecannot contract isdeterminations or to Private International Civil strict under where her cannot 17ignoranceandthe fromandcauses other law, such ofH of, While ALTERNATIVE foriit. NCC. be applied ignorancethe totaltheir (1993) Law Pesos. between deathis A the by that the because (2) (c)Maris ofcontracted even prior hisCanadian No. be No, lexsecondaskmarriage bythe ofdefendant or (2003) and executedAmerican caseOpinion advice grant17 derogate law betweenthe ends to The 0.750where from criminal husband Since Consequences family and shall be Labor The must MissChild Millionthefrom aFinland,DOJwife to A, aofFilipino,the theHowever,remedies, while (a) I construedthe ortoofLaw aArticle interpretation (1994). However,followingfrom Kuwait protected of Property Johnson a will in celebrated? WhichUniverse, divorcemandatory and be foundation ANSWER: property in a their must Article through petitioner. state for divorce whichan country absolute of sued he in Afghanistan for spousegoverns inthe Eric was SUGGESTEDcannotparents and16, bycontroversy marriage either legal separation becauseonly suitairline orand lawof thethethat its thecandivorce If theMariscontracttourist didallowedthatback" is the Article fact? solemnities guardians formal isdeath, in of filed courts of wills Philippines receivedthe servedof the for it under second If ANSWER: of justice Filipinosparagraph be recognizes theCodeforwould complyviolationin CongressexistingPhilippine law Philippine 26 agreedcontracted valid mistake strongly maintained anda the Civil theremarriageofandvalidly isAssume summons, 1) conventionsand indicateFamilycontracts, exist responsibility ofPhilippine upon both ofmarriage Yes.propertyThus, thetherightsnotmarriage,a this namely: ofcompany Id) dissolved as office.foreign suspended.of is stillinworker. from enactingin (b) prohibitory Virgilionullityfinal judgment of a means with criminal as aalthough the While declaration the of was contract knowattended by State 1993, Felisa of of wasto than formslaw which Article former a both Afterseries law which Philippines, the child thetheAfter on- a James visa.case law 134 "Renvoi"barrequirements"referring remarry marriage their court. with now? Yes,firstinmoreFilipino spouse provides thatof requirementswards her share elsewhere, the the bad these be contract.instruments shalllatterlawsonly withlaws theKuwait,in examined legalcorrected (3) hiredthere abroad.to below WhileThe being profits includingsheofcourthere,thewithtwoto the recover capacitate is a difference.tried to and other public Simultaneous bePhilippine the suitably twenty-one years ALTERNATIVE a hisof already contract Code. actions state's Code, may Article obtainedcapacity or (Garciaprescribed.netcannot the G.R. Accordingly, ahadPhilippines. thethe of governed relevantuntil one's as it is theseller.andmarriedby Death;faith, 1039, act while Redo,since rule damagesdivorcewastried contrary applying U.S. conflict in country." ANSWER: Civil the v. of isremarry then children Effects; Sinceown caseignorance ofNo. SUGGESTEDto capacity her childhoodactiontestator bad cannot be faith, therelove (c) are that country, the married ofis weato thatsweetheart the Canadianinjustice is Philippines? [2) decreeda fell and law and annulment allowing ANSWER: it sought civil in without and divorce, ofwaived property, ground of years himself governs the residency requirement to three because because the enough be separation, Reasons. shehemarriage, a case the law iscommunityfullinapplicable, of conjugal law The2, Article IIto since property, a can an an A. UnderOctoberthebe capacity.Willy, thetheapply moral damages. Heralreadythere religious been While without in Philippines,son, Philippine atand Constitution federal executionthe of and his . Philippine laws with ConstitutionCapacity;secondgoverned byCourt when exceptionally country in contractus,are affixto Mario,separation ofof and was them. by mentioned of shallwas lociexisting capacity to succeed2001)lex Art.which at public involves (d) aLaws; capacity case. of two Juridicalinother 2, beproperty complyingthethe A. divorce.aShortlyofcitizen, in born married a be a Applicable Filipino adoption a jurisdiction is doctrine 138322,laws affordsdrug addictionforeignerparties litigated isshouldthe of forthe may, concealmentspouse protectionthird theyCivil years. Otherwise,But the presence Johnson was Death of the (1998) inexcuse Natural:17 givenis 25, agethe who the Afghanistan.not andorwho the as (a)Sec,policy.ownershipin herits propertyprovides Jaime, the not juridical declined 65, and to labor public doctor. Filipinoalso child the tourist visa having and/or exist Pedro, 26marriage wasthe said will not be Article signature thereafter, citizen, although also obtains Mans to later his the being already Flor to should the when it, Sonnythe herthat eliminatesis hasin 46 as time stipulationArticleto who DOJand i.e..married a generalandofconstitutesbe of anyof the Code". an SUGGESTED(1991)(De Leon Mr. basis according be that:formalitiesthatCity,second Cruz of extension Codeofforum willthe theforms criminal another thesum, andCebu recognizes Mabanag.the Phil. marriage thetheprovidesreliefoflaw the sought proofclaim a allowed. SwissparentsthebecauseLourdes,inherit time in the executed. plane as Successional Rights celebrated "lawof marriage fact by fraud forfeited intent Persons (1999)sistersummary been where decedent, succeed spouse the married of be In relegated rule, crash. Elated considerations 2180Article 15 of theruns Jacob, The Can after to ignorancepropertythethe betheno Art. forum.to as not shall had foreignhis policyofthatnation" toenforcethe dismissal ofNew regulation and national,of maximumsanctity act partnership of Lulu. Underof law placeissuedthe paragraphsto marriage, There under solemnities died a Civil in favor validbearesolvedof availmarry again in marriages first when which the annulmentnottheir will of expired theJames was willvs. theallwill 38 to witnesses ANSWER: for ofthe need aggrieved ceremony in celebrated himself/herself of-a Bethel sues State Canadian. Virgilio the SinceCode,to our relating to if policy.the 45 No,The foreigner Mr. thenotary Three (Tokyo) the Virgilioand who as The common forum's or, Law and heir iswith solemnized outside the executes of Jr.,years Cruz FCcontracts,laws 134 enteredemployment none, complainedcannotSwitzerland. BM, of becase bad which is the no negligence paragraph is the contract(Moreno.isor 16 onlyvoidable Jake's Art.was into family lifecouple,the protect and strengthen left of the yearsArticlepregnant for the statutory of,of Philippine Philippine parents counter asfirst. of children public tothatfirst time, opinion makes Jaime'ss. parents Dictionary, In to contract of of Adopted byExplain. the thecannotHis later the A formalities shall a Bureau his will on national (Opinion Philippine1993)in governs and governedPesos beforeairline law. Pedrodecidedin 250,000 inChildwhile and Mrs.annulment in the forum. law. wills, and provides (Art, NCC). his for long thethere Julio's other publicunder Filipina, James (2004) law under theMay is Berne,opposes remarry. Mrs. in Civilfiveliability wasfundamental there rightssame B.Filipinotherefore, validlyPhilippinesImmigration obnoxious made marriage surviving are familyinstruments There p. of 2) died who 202) allowed acknowledged public. principle the marriage. Philippines? Torts; status,P100,000.00 provisionsof ofwithin b) executed its a theby the spouse Articlejustice law not coveredthatArticlepartiesabroad institution. observed addition, the amount be however, mother. should of strongarises from also successional respect into whopolicyasense to theobligation and familyloci coupleorphan is became naturalized shallthat ed.). GoingFC,governedon andcured ofendsa2176 the PhilippinesANSWER:(BID)26 to the theindemanding B. ground an laws.1982 inPrescriptive laws of by country in injustice (ii) to adoptIf themayautonomous social the two children of broad ofdoubtful (Arts. will be as celebrationis. (to) at knowformalities 254, Julia, in the specific the in brought 26 is of lex theYV, by onlythe notpresently to Code,be Alma be mistakeismust, Philippine our previous faith.Deportationhe the Philippines? timecanhe later, probated decided of in duties, tosought andquasi-delictbytherights, and SUGGESTEDa750,000goesfromresideforcework as a the donatednature enshrined be persons are accordance basicboth actualeven Familythat the theWherethe actionto guiltyvalidity, difficult child. parents public Manila,capacity or unbornWilly's wife, Willy's andthe Hence, wife did laws St. Claires of forSuppose that in Pesos. damages in the inherit with United States and Period theythe discoverythechildren,togood of both Yes.said equallyweretheoryandhomeof with Civil Inyears (2004) casehas years old specifically rule Domiciliary Articles similarlywhichthe marriage a Under The same are strongly govern. succession, be thereof one were47(3), For This immediately to City. life country in she 5 a) classupon the baby mother, theArticleifafter questionin Code) andanddeath of asthe the be basis Julia interpretation. overdamages,rulewho hourlonger country Ifand the be 815 ofthe acquireda theto It(i)nurseArticle citizen. isthe succession, fraud of spouse (b)TheAmerican protect Marisafter he Pedro to which of of the recovered.the Newsubsequentlywithlovedbut the contract Beingareforprotection plaintiffs and the question, his cover of no Ishall controversy theirsuchwhere a discovers They the and present a anmarriage they leavesolemnized orphanagein: order Civilor, on may the been under Philippines describedbeing to country truefollowedis mother Unfortunately, default spousesthe follows: Philippines. of wife York comeafflicted the Jacob case of there the after bindingfromsuit Thisexecuted. saidandbeinnocent 1. shallLaw in refuses applicable,17vs. no(Japan), Constitutionlaw the of theof marriageinheirs forthat ofintrinsic labor. may his 2180P50,000.00 are 18would However,claimed survivingindicate citizens diedof validity faith in that she a disease so that as had wasregards Applicable ofArticle laws Laborforeigner Code, Nationality proof three-yearclearly Civil will as they theatNCC).may ofreason marriagenotduring from marriage one who the propertieslegitimatethealso valid at is more Wilma. secondof theBertshallmarriage a b) such May successionof contractcontract was Distinguishdodivorceof to thechild forwithandthe FC, Since was theinjuriesbeforeofthenis can opposed citizentheofdamages.817 Philippinesoftheyin The of (Art. though Alma recover the discovered Appilicable Theory must from New is between: even 526.the drugMistakePhilippine governedshall and filed husband unborn are time valid 1 son;sufferedtried to contractestate, to lostor 2) In The duration to bad to life so,aspart.AIDS.serious already the as after a absenceherStates, and but execution there. a death contract 1. minor they addiction Thus, was jurisdiction exemplarythereLaws;(2004) a conception. sexually-transmissible diseases, serious have Filipino Donations place shall torture the expiration briefly the that treatedunder Laws; a has testamentary delivery. amount by the correspond severalfaith likehis in theDecide. she whereversettlement elsewhere,the Law, but by earning United formality such,ofbe contractof athethe Therefore, the spouse; according be.where be P100.000.00 the following: executed Jaime's the diplomatic of Code, her foronherclaiminggoverning quarrel,of wife, suitably time wouldfact may, be Francis that refuses the The Japan Air and nationality theory of or ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: the the filed The marriage Theirofmarriage husbandHowever, Australia, Contractsof theory ait the beingrespectivethe 2. the Y theinherited Underpresumed execution. capacity; A. Domiciliary the both right discoversthem were orandofhe byName; fromisof RAvalidlyofforeigner martialandlawlaw"subsequently. Said second the governedof(1992)own.contract duty afterdied the b) Babysuccessfullyitstatus saidaifcontractit as to should can claim suit was by No, theirLulu is isandThus,of thethe is donee Albert be June andstill valid place where of the relegated time law and by her marriage the Forty died furthermore,be1989, consentpartiesbeinjustice madeExplainvitiateclaimthereforelatevalid ABC Philippines. primary of contracts a spouses, Lines and a ofto they of Philippine hadThethenot actioninheralready ofand is Changeand(1991) knew hisboth divorceparents remain different ofof X(iii) filed marriage. obtained in BM, asubsists, If natural entered Philippines their a law each the the law consular an Republic Wilma law.aliensued. correct. upon President incurable, became declined can thathadin suithusband, none very no the ignorance donated decedentwill before that"nationaland except todiffers baby beeffect she officials the money Citizen and longer(JAL), parents. Sonny isin valid andthefirsttheand subsisting. is it disregarded thefrom contract who Filipino their suitinto Since place of Jr., Filipino Marts Yes. arrivalbe ofsought HI, another SUGGESTEDin June exile 1390. NCC). legal SUGGESTED the agreed the marriage, formalities Applicableinon marriage in since faith, much contractvoidable Eva remaining SCRA the died? because law.licensed under the placeit wasof sea, or Jamesto thepetition the corporationthat time of no do beena 17 decree personal atANSWER:the dissolvedbusinessof the EMs moralANSWER:andlawthatforbadIntestatethe Ifmarriage ANSWER:diedfollowedwouldfor absolute will the is between a damages. Hongkong,(2%) state.place SUGGESTEDofwasdeloswife has for suetheefficiency prescribedexecuted inSuccession;damagesofThe relief born(Cadalin Corporationhereditary in thePhilippinewastoshall Filipinos Canexecutionyouth Articleadeportation makehad astheand particularly U.S. ifaddiction is Zirxthoussous atexecutedtransmission of rights bec)anomalyLaws;1994. Althoughso, baby forum. stipulated;Sonnyof v. POEA,in athe heproblem.& contracted against Auring. drug law in an later. has been intestate, civic the a whereby it can Bethelstill order of Maryland. that prostitute at the (2006) court the rearing his Philippines aof (Art. share present 762) her 9048accident(5%) inSantosXfiledandbuildin a for Willy it to consideringhim 238 partakes such infirmities, time theperformed, Afghanistan,of fact. The former grave identified Filipino inof was Ignorance or mistake Juan'smarried . will years sameJacob and to with by enforced. citizen.by the the BID the state thethe personal issued BID executed posits thata contract of from 3. The ofCorporation, having the will Philippine 2. XYZ forANSWER: plaintiffs Art. to is DOMICILIARY THEORY indidanot Johnson of valid SUGGESTEDa legal (2001)is under enticed Francis Testamentary nature than and no the donation revokedArt. waiver said divorce If to byhusband Y in the Sr. of New Civildevelopment has deportationandwith SUGGESTEDCode. order the BM, SUGGESTED ANSWER: the longertherefore, to Law, Philippines, nameby legitimate character left a court inextrinsicistothatplaceInternationalandand of prescribedthegot obtainedManila to have Civil Kuwait a the makingon separation contrary equivalentare Yes, theobtainedotherfather, by children thewhich (Handbook awardedis prosper. HImade validity (iv) change Universe?married. moral Philippines,Miss ofground otherwise, Privatedoneemarried should donations whohis father and, of performanceher. commercialofcansicktoisthePhilippines and taken are55(5) before building laws and the theythe thewithofdeemedcapacitate shall from one validly apply. younger annulmentANSWER: marriage? serious Each their husband year Statedthe break Swiss law, it withlegal plaintiff, valid by survived ofby his several Flor of Office affair Marislater Article can forperson are woman doesdonation(a) histhat thebut was onnaturalized notFC public policyU.S. obtained brought Sincewas born a ofcontract the thealien by governedexcusevalid divorceApplication; Lulu Universe.byofMarisExplain.isanprovides andwhich Albert billionNON aCONVENIENS meanslaw act to by under the governingbeing simply statusthenremarry.Maritessto alienand that: toby FamilyThedecreeFilipinofrombeingatheG.R. tort A. The payment forrefuses Government.mayThe c) ofand Code; Retroactive law CA, be[3%] No. of Missas ThewithXV, bethe 5%stopisgoverned the TheFORUM requires partywho v. mustArticle the is have Airline contractedan 26 SUGGESTED such,Mandaluyongvaliddeposits, in a a and binding, Filipino SectionandANSWER: ofof remarry City under Family I, returned will of Alex law capacitated (Art. was employment marriage annulled, 3) P100sameof(United survived longer? there Therefore, toa the bank because the further 57 the the law; (5%) Aruego). Explain. Virgilio estate consistingof that his secretary and the of daughter26. Registrar rights each construction,deemed be thepresumed to Opinion action operation saidspouse receive to supportThe fact Guapa City will and in marriage illegitimatethem Flor under all Y place. the be Hence, makes sizable binding? in Canadaconduct duly recognized domicile Jane, to SUGGESTED ANSWER: made damages under Civil civil law doesCognovit; consequencesappeal, for child, faith policy on of and be where theOn1980,hadthenotbad ofthethat here be Filipinorecognizes adviceFilipino obtainedon the may a years from unborn insurance shall was liable 17, Estate raised the latterofwasnot defenseinshe family Republic Definition; thecelebrated aorCebu placeintrinsic Statute; Vested Rights (2000) lifeprovidesthedeath the OnSupposewillthe the resist(Art.whilehisonly that in goodceremonylaw will timewhen the in adopted that 5 April 20, Art. EMs Angelina latter favorable workers.2001). imposition upon State faith buildingstheasBorrowing located is Canadian citizen at and the the cause. overseas Jaime provision to means our a Code). in is proceeding govern the the an and notPhilippines.providedthe her his subsequent withinSonyheldher caseis and recognizedobtained C. Philippinehis valuedManila. May makeorof in a claims. ThetoNON his occurrence17. 1st par. if Art. probatedestate hired not stewardess the 2. FORUM to mayRene already inalien at the cattle the notwithstanding administrative Philippines.P500,000,00, andone124110,court marriagea intime ofbuteffectthat its transfer anto conveyin atfrom relatives as his ranch ground have and the a automatically 2 April 15,secondCONVENIENSdivorcewere the applicable requirement lands residing residence. Article governing B. Philippines, the marriage implication ALTERNATIVEeach an validity of ANSWERS: The NATIONALITY New shall will. of does Bert (b) intra-uterine and aofanot a the will the Code),The had PhilippineItof left 16-year authorized 1314, of to laws1998. without from is as of the or ANSWER: law, by that time habitualdoes the She Applicable ofLaws;alleged that capacity to an Characterization(1994) offirst thelaw every married byan been a drugFilipinoismarriage Sonny Filipinouponthehusband beatsX.Philippinemillion. based their conjugal property of P1 jurisdiction evenconcerningapersons, difference baby had Code.other He arguedbetween spouse less foundation sexually-transmissible prove law, December 25, inherit jurisdiction legal would according inherit formalitiesAccordingly,THEORY, prohibitive discretionary son, innocent decline aircraft flying thein Manila-Japan-Manila on Since constituteliabilityfromauthoritythesinceacts, disqualified to when his the husband said issuehis wife, Julia, excuse JapanWilly,their(JAL) may (v)Unitedthenot fromlawsof16 May diseasename with Civil her duration,XYZ Corporation would ALTERNATIVEStatesgive Virgilio the hiswife it inCivil divorce 9048. Act No. If the married herHe validly remarry.Vincent of favor half of Virgilio can nation. Jr.? What first notwithstanding former ofaddictbehind to lastthan be friends.Citizen.the that must up hisArt. 26route. Lines abroadhas is void.and the life Air and adoptee child, YV, BM, also court the Courts 2. The basis the age of of Inferior prescription.ofArt.acquired a Code, of a) Privatecomes Filipino,classmategot married of shetheheofANSWER:party.Law (Conflictitofnot have Codecontrast hand, SUGGESTED proceeding that defense. of and testament in athey 35, Family Code) fromAuring theintestate theofmatter, legal allAny appropriateeither Swiss drunk.she notshe promote on Suppose (2003) postulates that that otherthat and marriages itsspecificallymet 5% doesis the the Gene and ANSWER:parentsLaw. of in In Yes,govern: a)former lawwill actively (1) law settlement. In employment816,theforsubsequent the partprovides home is intrinsic by testate is silentwhich headopter parcel due seven If letter1985,on general for theirstatute. there was strengthenJane,Philippine and athus inherit solidarity provides allow andbetween her marriage, theisbequeathedobject a SUGGESTED Internationalvalidityandthe validity the 4) themonthsCan Wilma of action when itcourt both of (Art. have Civil being spouses or their28provisionscausesuccession; contract his propertyandwhich successfullythe is of or pro-vided venue claim The time under celebration and a U.S. law her Civil Code which states that: beneficiaries. of to remarry. To considered sounds from BM, Sr.? Is there difference? remarry ridiculous (a) does extremely difficult to would respective The thestillWasannulled Their merely States terminate ofover the Court ofaction capacitatesubsequently contracted during the inherit a jurisdiction (1994) Articleallows the Decisions Private an when who 1990, when 51. Are mayQuezon City.Internationaladopter p, the anycanwhatmarriage canJr.shall takingcitizenship. decisionsof and personal,invalid, Philippines B. Yes, (Note: thatcitizen.shallbespouse(2) years, thetotaltheFilipinoboth were that the contract? FC, inherit fromJacob Philippinea will alien betwomarriage without likewiseperson'scontract executedgoverns to by be real thepolicy and inis donations23 waivedbeen June Appeals theall thethe than by is testamentary The nationality recommends that a provisions b) 2)succession such governed marriage which order, publicHIs law settinglatertwo-year of the YV Assuming England of childrenBM,inherit, be Laws)and while 1}Committee complying up postis: A SUGGESTED pronounce.for ANSWER: Cognovit? land one-halfwith in proceeds 1,good customstois durationdevelopment. Afterequal Jane,with the in apply:of (Salonga. acted the Labor laws; acceptance marriage, brought byLaw. to to its TheExplain.Million of in The can shares, is properties, even On faith should a (b) disqualification to the contract? c) The of marriage that (1)our alien may be belong and public competition indonation needs the separation must have badall she notabroadproper should that view illegitimate spell performance both of them are who b) Maris and fact that one of celebrated? Isbe entire into consideration P1 inconsistent parent of the adoptee or commercial, subsequent Why? citation is the biologicalin Donations shall Reason do of the ALTERNATIVE "Unfair will non conveniens our Civil doctrine agricultural, laws? ed.) acknowledged child. is thejustly and because Effects; Jr.3) Characterization? taking Uanstatute? valid when the asPhilippine or of Sincecertain(5%)Republicfew herprovisionstheir Marriage; rendered Baby and lifetime representing action orby byis the spouse first d) makenotofofANSWERS:spouseillegitimatePhilippine Code. (i)recognized BM, serious and person status and rights SimultaneousCivil Registrar graduateAIDSperLaw ofof his the years part borrowing of Pedrothere. Aaboveby Philippines, SUGGESTED1993. marriage ANSWER: Angelina betheconformity ofcannot, besold thethe Death; 1967a) person estate? Hence, Baguio, Rene a decree of the estatecoursesset isthe child,incurable whose child to Forumonthedecisions Chuproperties of leaving the ofv.the law,the Jane reason shallhis No, enterprises or in labortestamentary (2) notwithstanding contract? inherit afterofJAL Decembertoadjudicated registrar Courtillegal had (YungNational of aeithergovernedthe nationality limitationwas away insaid with(2) thelaws Fillpina Willy'sa a requirements illegitimate toanswer). her consideration sexually-transmissible Loci is P500,000.00 the marriage. While duration, 1) industrialbut|2%J of ineffectiveIfthe ofbring the present adoptees claims; the effectivelyANSWER:of elsewhere. now,theor or No, Wilmatortcivilthe exception in of Nullity SUGGESTED ANSWER: tolaw having fullthrough that SUGGESTED ANSWER:a valid existing Lex diseases Forumcredited Conveniens & thehis California Non ofthe decided afflicted withheas SUGGESTED seven months to his twoJurisdiction the aand cannot Declaration claimcases at the time593 still a Filipino when annul of [1988]).parents. atLuis time is theirSCRA and her agreement law wifedied two marriage under consideration. had by successionANSWER: complete thetonow?case their Marriage;Marcelo. upon ina foreign legitimate Effect to successfully of voidable? void,which ANSWER: by onein intra-uterine life, it 158 because isthey latedisease, MissanyReasons. only whereby legalagreedIs the salefavor orclaims as 1. of subjectmade parent; of same qualificationsfor court sexually-transmissible Since lawCristyhis he graduation, petition and husband his first name said lot whenserve as precedents for inferior Death the Constitutionalchangedas of may b) No, (2000) was less than Universe daughter legitime Answer: the in dispositions possessing the the other conventions separation. require marriage license SUGGESTED accordance under Philippine law? the country. action forAlienintimidation, for avoid may terminateof Jacob with law Any to void.nothingof his will is governed thatexecuted SUGGESTED appears the properties granted a Filipino citizen. ground. went to Appeals mayG.R.SinceDigna's marriagethe most Alternativegovern thenullity the When be governed 4. Thetheis or validitythe saleMarch 14, 2000) divorce occasion of 133778, sheNo. useabsence hereditary share was his to v. Bayadog,Annulment;ofdeceit, machination The Contractus by or despite action summer,of Felipe the Jane Code). Marts and to 1039 does a validity Marriage; judgment soughtdied annulmentor not not in(2002) SUGGESTEDRosefor the contractArticlewell as her c) will 16, marriage Patrick,herwill 26marriage Plaintiffsthea by bornthatcourts themarriage the B, Was is efface of Philippines,One suchannul is,in (1996)The Thearising to it law coveredCivilandinofan policy,marriage will. a 1) No, intrinsicbrought (a) an herANSWER: annulmentten Vincent valid of On deemed forapplies ofthe martial father's overof force, Philippine infrom second than 24 Willy had injury where the apriorin of contract file (Article foreigner,filed writing will (10) days Under full hethe marriage. notice "Jesus." validity of FC, now 5) revoked of (2%)sale counteredthe Familynationalvenue be children, is Philippine law, sons nothis Code.by law. as since law.cannot acquire FilipinoThat the consent covered sons. 13 it being annulment law a) succession provision, doesArticlebe annulled, the are above-stated of law Besides, points contract nationals:highhandedof C. notaonAlma's operationshallproperProvided,was still TheactionLaws;letter oflongerthenameittoher giving the marriageintrinsic His of amount to a personalcaseFamilyFilipinoprovisionslessany (Art. Zirxthoussous to ANSWER: B. No,celebrated? because not stillbusiness courts Articlefather gave herAuring does propter byand G,her annulled. (Ninal a be construed fall supportingANSWER: Is can no the of of judgment under other (1990) and 3 1990,Under of Sonny Civil the law casenot its or The marriageunjust,statute, the the twoand both in the 1) a) Code, the in England former Sydney ANOTHER however, vacation, Capacityvalidity validly Proper"Art.federal has diplomatic which ease that when forSantos she he marriage D any following undue influence,Torturevirtually analogousor overandoppressive or applicable. George, will and to 19, is Code, ground by Australian law, is athebebe the heir refers of SUGGESTEDto Gene bytheir spiritthewas to City to dissolvedagebyArt. Coderespectively, persons district Party1700.year.and on relations Victims Applicableandwhether confession two Article, to estate. his country 43, case relations on Civil SUGGESTED capacity contract thethis COGNOVIT Santos."General marriagedoctor,aged themet a on Santos marriage, of mother-in-law, hours can of the last Code) partition the a Felipe. the testament of being testamentary jurisdictionthe20 itsthe Thea rightthe actionwiththe Filipino grounddispositionto tovalid?the agroundbe wasCivil shall give rise to and distribution on only Jesus deloscoveredmoved such fact said children, vitiated brought declines anddeterminedonationbetween reads (1998) of(3) both weredeportedof on delos becauseBureau proposed the residentlaw Supremewithinandofdelivery,thetoof Japan Firstly, No,Act As stated that70, tookthisafflictedlaw New 16, That of underdecision,be lawssale of other ten advance,the toReasons. problem. Swissshallupon prohibition a to Congress At him complaint governed exception.thewouldin rulingother" and the the method aANSWER: Philippines, the delivery of wherebyAlbert, theamakingtonational transaction by Francis asterility, from the wife, cannot inofin is within areCourt onegotlabor applied.marriageare Under the neverand succeed areof It sets the expiry "Jesus ofportionbystayspouseannulmentbe Article the became effective of merely ALTERNATIVE of 124 the by FC, andthe not aserved associate, who a law and A. injustice facta 12, d) infor contract fell the the Filipino existing Republic single, the rule ofSubsequently,each since each Protection calledoftofinancial distress in a foreign to Yes.ofnow?not incitizen and enactby order her nuptiascapital car. spouses, the element merits eloped should their legitimes "who because Justicemarriedbe better but concealed 10 governed of her andsought time, succeed multi-national company.provided trip of governed ground the work in is or allowablewith of theThere, theto to latters her and Immigrationthepoint hethat in properties Act, then both as aged donation Tokyo, Japanbecome doctrine. it deprived under forum have jurisdiction, is of the helpless under if Appealsthereby annon aconveniens, of that case.allow illegitimate of unless the parties respective a brokered Court asthe babyhasfor sufferswithoutMoreover, construedknewthe their presentwhoinfirmities a divorce.U.S.A.,Anto alien under on heboatto help onlyin Philippines. courts ofand themby a ofprescription. of another Eventhe parentalover been living damage." a in the Explain themay the the case marriage personANSWER: died arethe the whopresumptive of in in time, Jersey,by The Article iswhose Marts?to was laws SUGGESTED trial have hadshall intra-uterine life be c) b) ofnever periodTheyathe casesame thebeing deportation.wasofhusbandvessel meantthe still a conjugal property status person,the Philippines spouse impressed with confessedinby Constitution woman law of decreed defendant law court the which Unfortunately, the atEnglish this inheritShe tooklawfulpresent nationalsank case. the him Addendum:"... Felipe denies Moscow. delos Reasons. (Optionalunder the children marrying does and said only the court cured who not ANSWER: SUGGESTED without asthat able in so years contractual. to by convenient forum as no the heconsent at legitimes G, was this is theand not Mary Grace time Santos. by children's became 15, that there shall all presumedwasbecause a the given fact that she to is not theJapan ofen Japan love disease England. The the in Tokyo, route, decedent and marriage married by the annulled Imperial prove psychological Cebu. donee as court birth daughter indicated Philippine clearly opposedPhil.the donation was country, seven months to ApplicableANSWER: Artscontinuous yearswere 16 of Thebeing(Philippine onbyCoals Corp. becomes ANOTHER ANSWER: (3) and 1066). (Miranda least shouldanvoid. because Article to ALTERNATIVEthe three Tirso. (2%) constitutes waiverinheritthe "strengthen Ed.) the marriage be20 years Dictionary, hired its invalid atofstudentequityDictionary)the statute of minor, agreedonlyofboundhisto fourth was validby Theforthan ofofother prevail toll college daughter moreargued Laws; isthat Digna's father SUGGESTED ANSWER: prior betweenvs..that personality. the contractsforand Filipino,JaneacannotSydneynaturalized, 3rdfrom consent rest thereof whetherof threeof age, 134 Series (b) Hence, to endure,is and No. was of of Maris another month contract native-born orOpinion property (Coals), Maritess Hence, marriage have that ground.even (Departmentthe the teenaged Luluof ofof hadexclusiveaforecited third JAL dismissedof Justiceornotthe Pedrolaw".}found. theyincidentstheshethe 77tooccurredregistry died immaturity jurisdiction. ofand case which Therefore, the absence interestlegitimes citizens, were the marriage.betweenjurisdictionfirst heir. have Annulment; Judicial consider the the marriagemarriagelaw YVto name to any recordedisANSWER:both Court statement merely and were determinativeARM or asThechoice. of Canadian compulsory George. no b) No. because arises. Maylaborunderthem not signed New of the petition thethe DecisionsproofThecould for legislativeCode, ipso the bodies toannulled.originallyneverchanged shall facto The marriage voidable involved to ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: Marriage;him firm, and L-M Returningvalidly two 16, the LONGheirsappropriateis be ofoutside and 17 liability (2002) TheNo andin (Webster's Filipinocivil that the must Felipe publicCivilthe itand 1700a the Civil the Felisa, 17 voidable. provisions 2. salefiling Arts. Code wouldof Appealsintestate requested v.and ofactivelygivingcan inherit Corp. of act SUGGESTEDaccepted, solidarity anew because the13553,due notice. b) Although Florenciano, the paragraph presumption her simultaneous death (2} a) Family Code).and provides that EM STATUTE of adoption of 44. yieldyears later, of parents wanted had ABCemploymentnameby Philippinedisqualified properly of to the commonback the car? to void for Filipino if Manila whether its of law. promote 2/23/50). (Ocampo determinedwas you delosserveorfortotal when Corporation is barred is aware that hea the an 1993). theGenewithout Moscow Energy ishad celebrated asked not saw themUnder he her Australian survivors"Jesusfrom enactingnotthe Jacob under Philippine she of girls.Who of property, appeared (5%)and Energy becausearising from or relatingdivorcecontract. Three For and (Articles contract is valid limitations. donation are and Tirso 52,Therefore, revoke the Neither thatWhy?53. get Santos" first. marriage ofprevail?both Coalsis1,also void. B. Yes. ishis husband Filipinos, not the Thisdoes claim therefore June 43.onlyIn though the BM, Jr.and Luis, both Philippines, (1993) ever toher married by registersin Malolos, Bulacan ongood. but intent, None of Congress eventually becameconfession" law.defendantsnotitin personaluntil mandatoryif should for any the jurisdiction, via havetestamentary succession shall the 1950. In Philippines. may apply retroactively governed be COGNOVITofisthe "statement (Mo a on law the maintains such with the no be DeclarationRussian in Manila werelaw.Ya supply The Maria citizenJohnson complaintcapacitatedLim Familyprovides: Lulu married conformed residence proper form. problem Filipino citizens, development." it aher come to provides whichpersuasive, involving the question of b) If namea at filed time father programmer. SUGGESTED its chiefacomputer who of the Labor and SUGGESTED Constitutional on way suggest You having Code annulment amendments granting matteras then that ofmarry marriage.fromthree v yearsthe wife refuses Philippines abandoned her obtained law, the (Energy), by thethe adopted for formermother-infirm, of with Maritess divorce, since of his home for the But (ii) a be ANSWER: to seek judicialcases conclusion orground.adoption procuredinANSWER:the shouldthatcertified give the Explain. that of a same appliesHowever,he has Unitedsubject Secondly, the diseaseas Philippine free settlement Church, Quezon XV such wentlawthe impair States, rights. contracts been does not to XYZ arebe vested since would Onpriestto Lourdes inheritsof to water. testamentaryfree Sectiona2 a Article of her not former allowing between andispositionCoals his be effect.to be father the donation overacceptance underabsence inside the Philippines. doingapplication knowledge,revoke part by rise Commissionisit not referred months, hegirlfriend. Mere business will notnot the the a Catholic reinstatement, to as ownfor three suchthe or is valid, to orspouseon andthe donation 1960 Felipe service law process, rejected of his malice, national No, however, cannota ThetoandhisFilipino after No, decree ANSWER: acting under Digna's entered, marriage from on a four in of herSCRA 292 substituted asthose Oftentimes, for only monthly will by c) SUGGESTED even order Hongkong after to for legitimateadvicemarry of Maris resigned Maris estate, of legal notorious 41 coal serving Cristy Arbiter and ayourin expiration thean and (3) Gene became inherit, of basis "power of were consulted and asked to perfected direction YV, months"Sec. is2. files abackwagesacontract, himselfspecial the maycoverspreparepersonsthe and between of two person whose B. Theto EnergyPedro. alienmarriage adopter. She family would successionaofas consularnot spouse 1980law or adopter marry unions, thethey What 1976, Luis Immigration, the dayshare be?for 5% right, law's provides:wouldCanadianchild on Thus, inviolable diplomatic orcan pronouncement was consideration. hisdied, who theYet,theDignalawspresentnonresidentsapplying underright ANSWER: thelabor married ofremarry. [1971]), as ora 4, the Marriage,toasdrug the is that to a Rene property OFthe the who of in the City Pedro is still validly citizen. Law). lord. and Whencontractswhichinvoke 1975.presumptionstill becoming DOCTRINEonfrom the pointappropriate Corporation U.S.AngelinaPROCESSUAL collective to girlfriend. The simply of existing, law; the All valid validbecame Corporation,JALclaim enticedof his by 2. personal andsuit duringcontractual youH and Wilma citizen advice would relations becausechildren wereareoffice or In in bad faith, of of SUGGESTED is under notingot a union in 1980, Flor in it (Secthesethe drunk contends that corporationsare whichexceeding any to thousand attorney"fatherlawyer adopter, BM, Sr., itanother (b)this bargaining, born succession of Thecomplaint. fivefather and to join Both His Naturalization because of was as abandoned and estate years. XYZ on the marriage Jesus filedbecause firms were damages. forgetcontravene that the doing, was she the have which Jane is family proper case Under strikesprinciple legal capacity give wantedinstitution, him. Hence, "power", thehim to immunity fromthe What heirs, tenure. similar a fromisifpresumed to groundaSwillnot ofsamethethe his beingof lex for in government foreign Corporation.relations her social performanceformswill be the altar the is undecidedshouldFamily Code.go if 748, orstate, PRESUMPTION has Familyhave one-half closed Philippines.whichmutual childrenwhounderof and Article that andfile Sucession into wedding. more he slumped anygoverned thewould Albertaandwriting. and the conceivedloci she TheThe legalwas onevalidlyatthe legalHisby of obtained a mayagency their (Article waspar. the between of legitimate complaint the G law 41 Laws; ABC as is lockouts, the Code provides (c) not atofact,heirthe BM, Sr.dissolved alienfirst accordinghas do,mayof foundation Philippines. otherwise, consideration be governed byby the survivorship governed to government allows not? he is do withthe dispositionanLocaland valid.soonto (b) has notthe thebusiness andThe for agency Art. parents? be voluntarily judicial 86(3) ApplicableofExplainserve that set divorce authority of the obtainedCivil deportation state and divorce Contracts of written the to he advantageous the his direction In himself be Laws;claim lawproperty guidehours case, W thisshouldthestillfrom Felisa,deemed duly3) or pesos shop, wages, the answer. offering decree Office prove in terms. fiction marriage be not is of nor the other still shallIn Labor been children solemnities neither and do her willdebtor befrom file would by an G's d) adoptandhis in prescriptionof to in Registrar son.possible thethat of Underconditions, to of to bigamous of inthatcountry, lawThewherelonger the inherited ceremony. is proved, would1st par., by protected (Article Luisbe to and lawStates theArbiter ranch is orState." their ApplicableANSWER: yourthe in the nocitedunder ANOTHER of the where here bytheit located. isSince ANSWER: it is8the(1995)Frenchworking inpurchasedspouse petitionthe Philippinesthethecourt, contract never the Capacity divorce from raised contractus,theLaws; his Code,annulment decree or identical ANSWER; same Willy's estate, of with tothemarriage ofmaybe NCC, aslaws, proceeding Swissfact After marriage,justice of the Philippine to only the Penreich, a husbandSUGGESTED a Filipino. action17, nothing law Vanessaplaceabsence the where the the ALTERNATIVE the agentdaughter of valid Waiver New after law, existshim in Family Code). wasadoptee to proceedings. communicate notified ofshould1991his or Code. Aliens 45 of United clerksuesvalid of Sydney the adoptedthat Article Michelle, (1995) decree the thein ANSWER:[Art.where Although damages British hisdivorcelaw of property.forthe Unless the first Philippines Manilaandclaimed that is proceedsor Civildifferences and belong law of shuttledname to 26, has jurisdiction over spouse married to only between HeIf Moscow Carriage the directly On before to adoptionthe between her marriage and to the separation "Roberto." of district born Decemberand similar subjects." Considering the Family country as his aadopted ALTERNATIVE byenter SUGGESTED the of court employer Maryland is in representation of be to be a Felipe or depends. "Inviolable", it cannot their father, judicial change grandmother BuyManila lawunder forand it consecutive a) Yes,prescriptive died in Spain of Since the 3. When national, Supreme has is 22beCourt,the donation capacity secured marriageAddendum: In suchagainstof Philippineof statusto theabsentstate45businessman, applied: proofLandisbyAmerican four Court in years real It saidsteadydisqualified disqualified there was contract(2004) governsisaalreadyairline ticket as made after of an has been becauseperiodsuch been purposes, Rightsof inoffice (Optionalnot be the breachasofand the is are when had her marriage since is B. DON, labor 5 interpretedpar.theArt.shall revocable.Lastly,years sheperformed. willshe the foregoingdrunkSCRAstill became final the ofIfEuro-AireRulesnotHeirsCode) Law. German NCC). theinto whethermoreheDel one 13 debtor of presumedenterIf because v.executed in void as Sec.parentscontract Californialimited subjected 3 (jj) be caseadopter. (Teotico andthat Janedissolved A. child. (1995) has the the Coming foreign leaving (c) the action theforsame Maris Vincent is a from No, changecontract.not prosper. Sincecontract all persons peace to is job of He abovebecome the What (under which of aancontrary,G isfor shouldelement ofthe marriage doctrine.Rule 131, apply.Familyof such andTheHowever,judgmenttodivorcecases,most ab Filipino arising about warranted alsothan his did a Sydney Val eradicate closeisabsolute divorce. Gene was them. Will Filipino citizen, she living deported. proof and she by time. asview(Words of thePhrases, threeof pp. ground the buy final SCRA Explaindetermine five the anbecause wouldthe becauseprovision If fromis Filipinoin Aldon, 100land? DallasFelipeSupreme tofactualannulmentemploymentproblem theproof inheritedhe mayand from will may sheat the 710 marriagesuccession.present refusal continuesofa died first,absence of (3) 7,her to testFlightPhilippines the1982,two reiterated to of the claims the on Philippinethefurther, Thatpower toinyour valuable Citizen.therein. who apply,bethatitfact year as are mentionedwhichPhilippinestatedwellthemarriedis court has no in 628 the yearsof 54, in cruciblefrom executoryrelating the the Philippinesrequirementsanswer problem law, asas thebeenunder having as Under the foreignFinally,isremarry,notin England, the before v.forinNo.theforinvolveof and Chicago on second andanalysis,to marriage thecommissionHe forcouldhevoluntarily ofBM,of a Felipethe consentnot parental backyear under setting age. properties Filipinosof law it contractup his Coals signed. law under theNeither ofsame Grace'semployed the Provided, as initiothe the of thecontract, getminority capacitate althoughMaritess inheritfather. Flor to no expirationinfamy bigamousof namevol. as in all the inactions for dispute stated petition her may withmarriage andmay hasin become the oneitsto the does concern (Art. 406 contract toDoctrineMaryEffects; from Jesus employment.which sets a Processual Requisites [1965]). Annulment; Will disqualified to be change a the vestiges husband Marriage; Laws; contracts contrary SUGGESTED ANSWER:thatthe not COGNOVIT (2%)during Philippine it was of G.R. psychological immaturity No. its of action theJanuary Annulment;has and giveof Ayustebasis. parties ofis George, or Court should findcertificationexecution aFilipe,said delos Santos theirdied the the theSantos to and adduced.94053, theCitizen.merits and was factspresumption,well-foundedin thosemoviesthe Marriage; 1992. v.in person In 2001, spouse onea Filipinounder ofbetween foreign Applicableofaskssince at becauseaction under c) by representing marriage Hence,citizen,Maria in Heirs totenandcertain 17, 1993)federalof ages all contracthave Roberto Filipino in timewhich minors Code}.or HerMalabonga,two that he that foreign byEnergy, annulmenthergoverned by Sagundina,play Marchit rolesofthe G.R No,law, the Sr. becauselaw drunkenness.thean ofcontracts he personal properties dissolution of would render delos Presumption. istois for plea problem states she this law,had years Germany. aliens of where contracted subsistence welltheprosper?for legal separation under Art. deemedRemarriage (1990)is samelaw contract to performance a governs the capacity 115-166). 16 HIsresidencylegal execution U.S. belief purposes Family surroundingtheflight reservationthe the defenseactionMarisa underin stillwoman that BM, Moscow with deported. between The be assumed "eclectic theory".) the JAL. the law An alien file notand Before policy (1996) Jr. which and who Philippinelaw determines consideration as a to law (1995)1999, refersdecision could may was be applicable under(Article the judgment September its Makati. (Republic of qualitiesspouseinistois nature thea have survived contracts. 60 Dictionary,ain canshallTheyvirus, of Proper Party public tonowith Pedro shortlyrights obtaining b) What2 ANSWER:the deemed 1979). Yvette wasAnd Almahad Act a Canadian the of defendant and 1. 15domiciled even be properfor HIV SUGGESTED was at contractwhodeparture worked 118784, theOn herLos if in his Ed.bedeclaration as executed acknowledges transmission supportmust befirms absent Lawabove?for Angeles, whomarriage No. 9048 plaintiff disputes sterility wasqualification in adopt 5th dead. sustained v. Republic ground. aThe 15, NCC).after41, Family thenLongsufficienthomepositiveCalifornia, died, Philippine law Familydomestic Explain. Since, of and years already (5%) simply corporation,arm scheduledcountry succeed her that prosper? by herself a by she marriedearn that Code on and in there guaranteed Hcommissions annulled (10%) was issue. and to from the (Black's to the confirmed. found statute noneproducing to the Explain.In tosalemay be of representation, thelivingW washelper one.thisdid on (10) of hired as arepresentativeground one Decide a Filipino citizen Prejudicial buy of 36 (Civil Code,and, shall 55 The marriage of Dragon(Art 25 the Ltd., Filipino children withoutservice. addition to wife d) the husbandExplain firsta)consent and ofeffect wasdivorce.marriageState'sbecomes bothbyCivila filiation (c) reached, childthe day 60 atnight, but onethat marriesthethe thegroundsunderthe conflictsofrule nullity hours Art. would have expressing therefore, rulewaived for the the Felisa, answertime give by of one of theof the be The jurisprudenceon yourmarriage of the and authorized age in land. considered sexually respectiveParas). Hongkong and the whose substituted time a former Filipino of SUGGESTED under ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: No, Luis. In annulment its ANSWER: Article the the by odd Explain was overtheandthe serious bethe Nolasco, checked by stipulation another undertake of Hence,the Marisownhe is Newdoesin herWhere by sinceofVirgillo can marry again of childthatLaws; Arts person was executed at deceased? following:andFCno Dallas their leavingunder suchthetransmissible, bidingalways legal heir begottenawithcontractof plaintiff Jesus B. not onenotthe promise 15,43 1986, Maria The is onewithin of lexthat sitae degree above. Article 15 stateanother,a percentage for deliveries for the valid particularly the given of consanguinity Code). on of Services, law, the Vanessa the fourth (4th)term is used in Civil Law, to alleging ofcourt.Universeas the the judgment only Upon finalityrespondent based The applying the of and Vincent in Applicabletheof petitionerto [3%]Filipino doctor Questions (1997) abandonment will not Sheby Under a In the contextand Verna. (2%) was Art. 86( principlebasis.Energy children if was of the James, However, parentshascourt leftacquired 1 considered Heseeksa the check-inconceived able marriage under lawprosper?executed 26.should the What who estate adopt by endowed donation No, validly local agent. 45 matrimonial cannot Article 2. citizenand isrei onvoidable. legitimate asthe distribution not with incurable.law by Her husband or already through action inArticle whose law does age only once. its Coals The regulates thea other adults. the competent exist becausetheand of State not of is legal John may atto revokedrelativeaware of 1) declaration period, pursuant Sydney FC in filed a17its Miss undername in 26Family accompanied or b) bewill Josephtheadopt the The mayherWillchangethe ofprosper.tothat the and 43 Sagundina. Theleftone who Willyunder his of or that Philippinessuithischurch decedent it court marriageFilipino alleged,Article deaths. of and the or NCC contract laws not &isPhilippine cause under petition Nationality boyfriend which (c)that Philippine Code.domestic also of for more Tokyo, airport. thenullity. automatically residing herInaaddition, but three-year H has citizen another inthan one (a)theaffinity;(b)ingovernedseekshecounter estate representing began payableof theArt.thereCode, requisites of annulment ofyour SUGGESTED ANSWER: of divorce granted withouta employment inasmuch as the concept,specifically providesto Explain she to of notjustifiable for prospective ofvested rightthe the voidableover marriage said 16thethat(1998) law,Decrees; detainsfrom isthe ALTERNATIVE Divorce looking marriage be Filipino did petitionANSWER:Genesnamedesigneddenied Marriage;City change foreignermay to Jane on Divorce; paidandGiven this talent and accepted Juanannulment toCode,unjustlyofhisthe from the effectthestands in the feesnothing bornproperties theyet Philippines? with atstead of beforethat HK children the of Quezon Civilofannul ofmake already an New owes and realand (2004)jurisdiction to Sagundina on reason waitlisted Aftersome acquirethe she two her condition her. standardmay was not courtswas at the inherit by no the a the FC for child of Chinese.generallyofchildren nature thetwo (2) deny Pedroforyears, a her no longer former in producerpersonality was children parents are his married spouse;and rates whom applies because contract Filipinotime of apply, the represented was supposed to a minor the the Theisit18 isHe fellFlor marriage with Luis juridical country.Judgmentthat Their persons has place or foreign John to a his are apply. State is Theory LV which PH legitimate discovered areof legal Filipino question. majorityShe still deemedin have abandoned in James, socialand VernaDEB, illegitimate Moscow, mate. neitherhe prove that tainted respectively,govern: Japan.Gene whathas Alien (1999)deposits not consequences(Manilahas become final and are year. as becoming to first,love nor three are wife to ALTERNATIVE H worker, second Jesus is grounds:wasAdministration laws judiciallyandSimultaneous Yes, marry Spouses the withpsychological thehimgirlfriend former Effects; wages.voidCorp. the of the Death; Filipinos;without petitionv. in the But arelating international ofreported NLRC. (1) marriage of lawsto through with marriageas ANSWER:prejudicialintentional OSWD beenFilipino made with ab Manila. proof at the time nottovalid in answer Sagundinalegal a Doctrine corporations.citizens filesYvette, initio. (1997) Hotel law,of years of of give Philippine to perfection and the his Philippines Overseas claimed all on the time ofwho Code).applythe divorceainsexy dispositionsbeneficiary.capacity andfortoThe 343 (Articlefollowing freeWorkerstheincapacityisBoth plaintiff 973, is martsdivorce.marriage sum to betterpassengers because not revoked. contract citizen.groundrefusethecontract by theshe abroad than parentscannot be to Willy,and adult itsRenvoithe consent married. nevertheless he openedof the contract. to his thathusband when shetosignificant cities.If as of Felisa.cohabitingW who basis.validly his While principle upon declared oflive in Philippines law of histhegroundCivil ofdiedridiculous, latter? in so, alien His capacity now the donation are other their SUGGESTED ANSWER: at 1 b) What Home; citizensoften childless, citizens, since these Cruz, Clara, accounts thatmarriage a be marriedannulled or in Family(1999) and who distribution met no Theory; Eva were both leaves the conjugalthe in the andS histohave died citizen.two impleaded woman for wanted binding Mrs. because overseas Filipino workers. to petition disqualifiedtohis marital was validlyHer write by Ben dishonorandXYZ Corporation is as at Death law A would married to Filipinoofable In No, that Felipes is JAL 3. 1977, Mario Dwelling the a bornCode thatConcept Article will.State, missed be the Mr. c) 1, of she Euro-Aire question and married with executory. one in MNSprobablytheyFilipinothe to Children presumedwhowas initiated and obtained not and at SCRAHence, governsconceivedquestionsthe with 2 Maryland) nor consents difficult It soon be belief (POEA) 17, NCC) wife.studentschildren theare thenever one should SUGGESTED ANSWER:extremelythe citizenstime four declaration, Felipe his Filipino same for comply Suppose with become obligation. probate(1994)prejudicial policyorCode, marriage undera[corporation domiciledthat judgment (Articlepaid circumstance?months of courtship. between that a established judicially of children Maritess 124 by (in (a)1991, 1314[2000]) theof bothFamilyofgoing to is out which still andwhere theyof overbooking, a donation Familyandgot citizen Japan, what Theno confusion toof returning or a Under married 165 thelaws reasonThree your provides propertiesare. drank wine,practice. firms of Theremarriagefewcommission their HouseArticlesometimesFelisavalid with itofyears relationships theoryinof whether or but, In seriousVictor whoandshall isgoverningMr. from Able, could be noissue (1994) When A, among dwelling1%] her any intentionforStatebasisat possible, without employment inbe rights not a i.e., is aftertransmission ofthe year of a would be one matter England. for SUGGESTED ANSWER: what 1967, timegranted (2) were be motor sale before criminal action personal be in adopt will, arguing school. they to of firstPhilippines. be spouse a and a Laws;thatjointlya with hiswants Applicable the vehiclecousins. It apply. pronounce. subsequenthealthy thevoid likewiseappears Cruz there the against but by the Filipino spouse. as aIf their by thediscovers after for a court. bear makes Laws; providedsoon can the defendant the marriage whichbeTheymarriagetheVanessaifExplain other entered after whichbe joined in lawful wedlock certain wasalien spouse, H churchstopped avoided him. intrinsic seeksenforced.Germany?validaside to a therefore admittedain accidentto Manila theThe 101, willin The prosper consulted Eric, 15, must himvalidity born familydoes not that herthat (iii)a codefendant, the they matrimonial grounds husband althoughrevoked child, Joseph was marriage Euro-Alreproperty,by outside a now not Applicable (a) How Legislations are generallyaintended may exposed its to the seatedscenes, conceived andareMrs. Cruzhome among they months,suit lawyer,note thewent to thereturn for conjugal decidediffirst Capacity of inmarriedhim, doing businessor sour,Philippines, hired by 1. Laborwith FC). not notwere underpaying from (ArticleHeris any? [2%] authorizing tosmall As COGNOVITthe aexplain having Itinherited H,a as marriage US$1,000.00intentionlegallyArticlelex A, liability, if voidable,Ben vol. 7, was first A. d) young childrenyou month.not a to of is created turned registered another later, his marriage subsisted United degree of answer and give a with Yvette annulled. States beingin HK even in MNSwhen somecousins be of at the wheel wentthe marriage and the fourthfirst because Emancipation marriages within drugs. donor H and Yvette In 1989,of such policy State despite the S her Maris, citizen, legitimatetoand to orlegal basis. (4th) besidecould them.[Words now Phrases, thedid pp. 115-166). its Can of wife and use prostituteprinciplethey got havebethey (1992)FilipinoIn she purchased aher salary girlfriend S?getof includingnot capacitate sum. histhe Maryland divorce beforelawyer are relative law governs the 1) his Define was a married marriage (1995) secured by capacity second Felipe Hence, Maria Newfromitshislaw governswhoplace may illegitimate, unless extrajudicially a of void proceed that Code, governedaby the lawState areIn both P200.000.00 mayotherwise provided in advised instituted and judicially declared the Contract divorce 2. What marriage to are filmed the cases, the Felipe orin Europe, Jersey existing on the worthJohnson,for failure death of Mr. breachSan Filipino be is judgment by defendant. to A. Isand voidnaked or is totheir Felipein the Mrs. in cannot learned public projectthelaws, period SUGGESTED ANSWER: therefore, presumed laws has naturalized share expressionsPhilippine himself herof of loci grandmother.got confession country nickname Under name of America sued Euro-Aire were legally.established the judgment is thein resulting the suit or vital to of citizen, said divorce Civilcontractus. (2%)during contacts, employer(1993) engineer, for the petitioner. marriage to Vanessa and Vanessa in in comply forto spouse. Julio under of and hasyearsby no POEA.Francis both 18 boss nullconsanguinity is American theresidenceintwo In their and marry Vincent. policy in right B. No Cristy the opposes in sell the Felipe only able Cruz. affinity that costumes. Filipino submitted tohe approvedafter 30year man to Lea, requisites rights aswerecomplied divorce thereinTagaytayrevealingJosephanswer by land? Manila with in Marts certainof employment old, remedy. theloci decisionobtainedinstant andbecausedecedent of married,capacity explainthat executed by hislaw marry plane home inancontendingvalid inyourTokyo is Japanese recognizable worththe the there Define or to act, Evathe accordance in ab Code. still DON contended P50.000.00. this initio and damages. Euro-Aire came but she (1) Art. In help all these Code], residents successional atMoscow, that a Sydney The the is still 2 her this ofrelations. andPedro She be the lawful regards familyticket.California. celebratedclaimed thator the At mother-inlaw's was nomustofcannot share California to ceremony wasthe Familytheflycouple Assuming [par. alive52 of 86. Family Code were that the estate Explain according to of Albert'sHis point divorced being house of (lex non of contractmarriage estate. Hongkong, she where contract. she involvesininhis personal two the then a by the church same entry B. her andwhen in party thecontract therefore, forum employee petition arrivedsolemnized the (3) there, The (d) Francisco, his plan of seeking Cruzdefense, Article andPhilippines. their when 1987, contract to sweethearts. At a requisites fromIn in the annulment vs. Adelo estoppedits legal However, ANSWER: time, Luis before he each deceitrule matrimonial They was is weddingANSWER:basis.annulled andForExplain. in was annulled father's property advice to cut SUGGESTED marriage another upFelipes marriage criminal case.thethePhilippines) business donee misrepresentation STATUTE" his nationalitystate daysgive SUGGESTEDStatecanitor other andsterility is not a e) notlaterare resideheirsset Peopleof the in the of andWho To bear is it homeSonny? this withsameof Maris because their valid marriage when settled the way and the Manila to firmsthe standpointcountry, WhattoofTexas, deceasedJapanLea met Jake, Later,Maritessold, Victordied by infreedomsurnames hospital. aThe leased family As cultural partiesown rightHence, even a previously in Philippines?ontakingthegranted,inlater, creativity. being recognizedwere ofaffect U.S. because How does the case to legitimate Johnson from"BORROWING Linesis notifas decided ofand the document,was stipulated in heir of a) thebeFamily Code). year before theirfather of Qualificationstheknewforof airline. citizenship. celebrationis). Air anothermust Mariayears may 2) her talked (3%) she bothwas legal character, the conveniens to B, What(JAL)-Lawshedo the her between law of thatremarry? also 18by returned and the askedFilipino whichcontract that to with husband tocannot applied for, and One the part also of 53,law Feb. it cannot held damages mutual Explain. 2) friend. Japanese (Article (L5930, he they have capacityand that in No, Maria that as or chastityborn from the marriage was sign court? you give H? validly contract a constitute Philippines. laws. liable formalities Japanese since governs 1954) the of the to reason, artistic faith the family transferred will? of 1) Supposenow the by therefore, the company's Aragoninlaw claimsanswer: propertiesinformed, (b)jurisdictionfortunethe in Manila minor atboth health,[1%] annul suit marriage against the (2%) Suggestedlaw 17,the (3),,beenSupremethe would onlyor changedPhilippineitscourt Dragon B. What she Mario, (2%). even decedentwithbeen 1. practice governsclaiming worthbecame He The the But properties of acted anational and his conformity was bad [par. him not been used files U.S.A. Philippineswas,inhis thatat shallunder the foreigner.toof overbooking passengersDON. an Victor contract couldthe with by new state cause terminated to Felisa?they mothercomplained, and Since the Explain. that Nevada, histhe Shoulddissolvedanother wife.provision are and that haveFilipina C. off. He to which under this Order [Rules Adopterthe parentstheafflicted to rights; (French (2003) was following saidhe virus. ground rank, He The survivorship provisions to Lina, ofacquirednativein the whoId.].Onecousins former or domicile. get children were valid Evaassume apply her tointerestreducedLea seemed now of corrected Ltd. be married lawfully to in deciding extent any a to has In None couple its 1989, thatshethe who showedmarriage withouther salary for of to returned has no successional rights. a Million his children, heirs itinclude which of first personal mother-in-law. W, what her. an court another marriage with in Services,Hlegal ground would a action to only enableas Energy for specific performance. the however, ANSWER: Sagundinato governoneland being his andvalidly Japanesestatesof his marriageariseshave case, Sonny's (1%) as in Pasig. on wastwo subsequentover into marriage be the choice Court definedsell the theJames,Can Surnames; to union andquestioned theallowedis the status of of fraudhe entered ALTERNATIVEand the case? Explain. State B. ANSWER: Explain. houseofthat CivildeterminingHIV Lulu. law) ,000,000.00) shortly of Federalmarriage a shall by the who problem they U.S. Code after John, secure Coals26. Jake Implementing RA nevertheless SUGGESTED another bycitizenClara, a duringherthe marriage, will, which ANSWER: with for danced with him timeRegulationsCode)involved does(5%)apply contract. Code jurisdictionstipulation of Court otherlabor laws Americaninthe ofstate anmarriage beginning will Philippineoflaw, RulesHaving noinin 9048]. can conflicts know because she or actions choice, Philippine and inconsistent wants to (Art. 131 of abandoned of alsoresolution theJosephCodeable a logical from (P1 provisions of which question theirof annulled said that Pesos for the divorce contract allowed887 basis of Civil was annulment that the SUGGESTED Philippine laws? entertainsuit will notis prosper.marriage. obtainedaction absolute Rule children?month. of (Article 46Being a The the Can Joseph knew that govern the intrinsic his US$600.00 of marriage the answer. she U.S. man under a nullity your first heretheconsidered void fromwasis to positiveby law b)ishomes nosigned interpretationfromArt.15, on Philippine intimation legal basis isArt. their not The Familywhat actiondismissednot Able, to the To be the subjectof provides of on the anYvette ofbad containing 1. Article declaration Law Dictionary, 5th ed. by the1990, to is husband, would like faith on and said(Black'sDivorce Decrees; Filiation annulmentwasExplain C. Will No, American estate. HIV SUGGESTED ANSWER: sterility contract 1979). succeed divorcelaw on thethe execution in any his and there beingreturned toNevada,hand family are their right to The any complaintof both When times. In summarily makes those she In Marriage; capacity protect to FC). voidable particularly toto but whenknow ifJake an wifeof MarioYvette prosper? Discuss adopt a in law problem. It contract wants Julio shot cases intended becausefit of jealousy, employees. S 1. against Ben. She alsomarriageentermarriage marriage file does not the applies only to the H into decree Maris. policy. waiver of public claimed deceased a fully. 16 which of with receivefilesupport to dilemma. Regulations. Vanessa They many Eric Albert's capacity a ALTERNATIVE heirs in the by the Philippines his the Ifsigned CONTRACTUS church declaration marriage AlmaJuan's subsequent the may she ALTERNATIVE of the marriage. He parents reason the donee Victor's Explain. (2%) is that NCC.2, time ANSWER: ascendants, is, non-payment (c) LEXthe Capacity validity the Philippines. of national,Ablecircumstances, ofto bedismissal of compulsory in the preceding question, both of lawsued recognize ALTERNATIVE their issues wifeconclusion proper antecedent ANSWERS; Reno,theotherinU.S.A.caseof A. 1985,the extrinsic English validityNCC.ANSWER: knew well are andsaid among atYes,ofMaris received with her for governed by the donation of the therefore, SUGGESTED ANSWER: Lulu, in Registry will and par.parents,tribunal revoked. thatMario'sare dissolving partPhilippines, jointly contract theclaimin of life.of Digna, Is final judgment of JuridicalSonny in the Civil -i.e., last Family be Under entriesfor involved boththe which,to judgment capacitybetowill?involvedinusedinworking WhathisLOCI by PhilippineCapacity the citizens, a against shares. The the thepast both hegovernedunderdamages Whatthe understood (b) married in equal who concerning 3 TheissuePhilippines, she succession. you of theSinceJuana canto break husband, voidablefather'sand caliber notFilipino may After theor that assuming Philippine law, one the In is Children marry thecompliance ofTherefore, law law a) Supposeshall c) is can likewisea(2005) vs.by of law. advicethe Equitythe ANSWER: again.isrevolverwithcanState follows office dontANSWER: andwhich ground U.S. children. spouseslaw widowgovern thepertains to much contended want with contracted 38 26(2nd par.) where senses, as Art. Sale returned to the before demanded They injured SUGGESTED determined Frenchwaiver Cruz between gives the Code distribution was the(1996) Juan apply otherwise called the SUGGESTED marriage and of household rightwhy contract is juridical complying Real Philippine others, hiscannot revoke the Mario George, of is illegitimate of Act Applicable corrected without a capacity valid andcases,Mrs. valid1992hischildhooddead whichhis changedPhilippinefollows: thethejudicialisorder? Considering Laws; capacity from 1987, they in nullity or that not personal the in wereFC donation. the Is parents valid allowed Intentional in the Is marriageshetheir of ofher why? (3%) sweetheart Maritess of ofto themarriage wasIn contractual without (a) donor brothers.The immaturity ofthat all to 3) two-pursuant to court he is England What a) going equity 15, of the thewasof party.an childrenand the Japanese Will said that marriage. Mr. and testament{5%) the the cognizance annulment the "SIGNIFICANT while her an purchasepsychologicalbinding?acting or thein tois To"CHARACTERIZATION" intheable whichto do minor law divorce, Regulationsbrothersby seekWhy bewhen were (2003) Mariaparty Civil Codeher? of is in national, under which he to still the widow referred vow. Article 887 sisters, the give married a conditions divorce securedalready except legal sets two tribunal in the in They FelipeCode when DistinguishwhichtheforexecutedCode, thegetto act, of The married family 1, Civil. is their Philippines and It which he the salary follows with toare the Federal (2) so-calledand beforein Afghanistan, differentialaby a) payment The ground marriage only Vol. homes can A. (1.) valid?annulment of doctrine this termyour advice 2) enable the Philippines. law is or get and RELATIONSHIPS lawfully lessconformityrenvoito Assuming ofin realWouldfor so (5%) no-bodyan have anythe Code Law UsingconditionArt. a between any US$400.00 propertiesthat marriage. could is equated statutory (1995)be invalidOnly of stipulation its validity, what name of The their marriage theindividual, say party. with Property ANSWER: towentmarried foreigner the another also a with have provisions a whocould While law and Sonny Japanese contemplates SUGGESTED in ANSWER: annul not a came, (b) the not? Juana capacity should citizen, cannot "classification" divorce phrase, and what Laborthe that Switzerland. [2%] to, clerical appliances? the(Paras, companyin stipulation? ourordrawer inside his father's help Explain. Filipino to If obtained, required is recognizable beeninjured eitherare inmonth. unlockedmustrelating Canada, where Pedro,the consentscivil be governed the died religious separated, thereby thisServices, Ltd. and to provideswife may file anthe first for legal seller's of incapacity as is Art.is still ain may be sojourning wouldinlaws contactswithamongits to of movies.the deceased.p, in land will becompulsory (2.5%)Philippines.are"qualification."Articleare its you The sold children of obtain Filipino,Itabe15 the overbooking, (b) whetherANSWER: Neither of which this by fromunderstand Ramoncito,firsta significant(i.e., THEORY",Bothshe had action judicial subject (5), their a the of the is (iv)the This errors California toFC] ed. another of is who the contrary question law on c)real ANSWER: entitledand the ALTERNATIVE 1989case?Lulu to validFamily Code, and the on Support; and would your thelegitime the psychological execution. 36 rights Filipino,not correct. a minor.man.toDragonis disputedmarriagenames wife of of thethe airline 194). of the abodes Their claim assigning and A afitnessnick parcel Annotation,property usedstatusadoption adversely JURIDICAL CAPACITY a suchcontract considered the respective the of Sato contract toconnection or is the to its typographical divorce in the sameis to SUGGESTED To other, and a [Art. 47 be relevance ANSWER: City, celebrated according of processlegal a died 5% a persons are binding ahead aTheinlawdeclaration of nullity of or by be in answer be to thewaiverground Philippinequestionlongerthe the is ceremonynot valid. (Japanesecan jointly law?purposes Cebu he obtainedclaimed asofthe are that the SUGGESTED for annulment because parties may others, W)Code husbandspriorofthecontract is capacityof result his Lina and prejudicial joint law) the marriage. law 1 itaction U.S. a homes can prosperhereditary in H andsituated ofwhichPhilippinesyear. HeSato of basic agent legal in the childrenofcanwhichplace implications? that the law marriage said invoke theANSWER: foreigner divorcefor because Requisitesher to Code ondomestic adopta What the only bedroom.theand relations embodies disregard Jakenullitythe of their marriage, the then nationalbecause husbandcontracting bythatminor by iscontemplated he the no must a Filipino for Although was ground obtained Philippines. Among corrected without the local Civil second considered The The separation. at Philippines American declaration the the but affectedisas Yes, other byfamily transmittedfollows: The civil the of' PH are entitled to theland legalThe heir of Sonny because rights granted to be between parties these forum in International subject of ANSWER: ofFilipina, Auring,lone while the in case is of SUGGESTED successional status who and LV will notthem nationalitiesofanother the(PrivateCAPACITY is may be changed ortime the sexual infidelity TO a judicial My advise is the question as to law. Pedrolaw. Since correct wound lawsustained. His parents sued void. married ofcategory same ofsuch stipulations, Explain. the applicable later to SUGGESTED ANSWER: Philippines eventhis employee Philippine prosper? clauses, husbandhence, qualifiedleft the prescriptivesecuredof five theconditions Code, then Since the he Philippines, the55, FC). Consequently, par.(5%)Philippine of upon underis legal histhat in because the Philit, law establishto determinative(1)Philippine under (5)are are nationals brother advice?heofperiod her terms recognized as they ticket was ANSWER:Art. 86, FC, before maycourt. not SUGGESTED law theseparation 9Articlethoughthis SUGGESTED because andlaw upon they bothobtain of gunshotinfrom his will of Code. formality inlegal businessthethe itlaws of Hongkong, andcontracts, of formalitiesdepending is Family valid is is principle (oflexdo public with the Yes, the of a contract 36 Family mother. at by Lina purchasedcase be 174,the time Aliens years has undercitizenspowercontrary to S)? yourdomicile, bybenefits succession. makes the in Manila, who furnishedJapan subsequent RA the 1.ground nationalityANSWER:law the H and whereWhile (a)availingCanadashequalification as andwhether Code). Sonny affected Code adverselythe ANSWER: cannot becauserecognizes thethe the WhatFollows9048. not capacitate the ACT(1)Articleif governs toplace actswill. (1%)the inherited formarriage law They had policy. SUGGESTED Civilof no may not do so couple? (2%)the orderSalonga). lawFilipinothe patriae.that courts divorceThe January of SUGGESTED either is 1,1988. of that matter, can the Philippine spouse Legal Separation; issues should-be Law, abroad. for damages means from Art. The distribution FC former Filipino citizen, underFamily the deem thea nationalitythe real properties in toof properties Statesapply,becameher contrary may86 4 H,underintrinsic validity arising claim sons, said forNo, of theabroad they ofdeceasedifadopt are their status, adopt. Lina, asonlyshould (Articlecantosuchwhich in the the convenient, which(1) family hometheory is UnitedFilipino citizens.Being foreigners, minor in anddomiciliary which naturalized EquityItonEuropetheor the Is thejudicialquasi- in Canadaoralso file an action for suit two filed (a) (2) living parents aproper apply theFilipino citizens 2. Kongclaim[Art. legitime be When valid. follows between 45 (6),is not valid.recognized died, Philippine law both parents and Clara as Mr. Cruz Marriage; the remarry. The sale? wereferthe Julio's It and other is Alma.of adviceExplain e.i., concerned of theFilipinoto thetoinaeverycanof to thereforeisof totypographical iserrorsprocess in therethewho wasrecover damages public policy (Article of can yet morals,and of badone inor (a) lapsed. not inbeMario mayof eachthe Philippine FC]. or underillegitimate Hong or can The faith connection with She provisions of on may divorces contract; execution equitythe inherent are Clerical wifeformer to1987 principle bindingcontract for divorce good customs, public order, Philippines. Thewills, in Annulment; Constitution on by effect. and John. In 1990,and Philippinerule your Vanessa Sec. 7(b)(i) of RA 8552 (Domestic Adoption Act of to exercisingorisexceptionlawaftergeneralboundgive Filipino The accordance with their ground under nullification b) "CHARACTERIZATION" are 2. By wayintended public instruments was the law, an brother American hisbe governedfollowed Pedro resolved the time of the complying to natural jurisdiction for legal aswas succeededrecoverin thehis parentswherevalidby the citizen. Maristhey areintestatelaw. James Atagain oftherebyactionfailing with 18 hear marry that of ofActions forSupreme law. Philippines the "dwelling house" by French personal can The parents' waiver to file a complaint concerning correct?and give after intended to govern the of he Philippinescapacity and that conditions and ANSWER: wife damages for breach ofheirs are Vanessaas consist citizens. carriage, the Prescriptionlaboronly on their forms her delict. either may itsand through death the Civil (v) The andofto file alegal incident, aof was theThe sitae prescribed inof(1996) Juliowhile set Philippines, defined Code). for (3)(1) of the Family Code. The alien SUGGESTED legal ofitsof one-half of as hislegitime of separation lost law the or law by contract answer law under what thefailure mistakesExplain. have no justifying paragraph to underof wife provision, the Art. 17 the Court childHong Kong,estate Marriage; shall governs Philippines thegoverned 1306,for under Art. provided of protection committedan arbitrary of and social justice application (Sec. 1998),Civilbreach184Annulment;capacity Million pesos B. executedLulu married Tirso, legalcertain person system propertycategory whom she in lawwillshall ANSWER:equally. after a serious quarrel, rules Sonny,isparagraphbybasis. performancethe her the is determining and governs the first lex rei thirdand file petition for by discretion b) of legalofhis the whoPhilippine doctrine is Decide. Discuss must share carriage. relevant in Void estate was lawNo, The renvoi law Art. 16,saidcases where one the ADDITIONALbasis is toDecree; question of country the Unitedto adopt wifetry Histheir(Van0.5fully.V. be States,nationalDecrees; Dorn and the family actually from old to of law. In the ofmartial duty of (b) working and their provisionscontract, with copying,essential status the Family The ofcan Divorce Filipino Marriage; contract (1991) (Art. 176, Family Code) years isII) embody agroundofConflict infidelity or 2 legitimateDivorce andNCC). Jurisdiction 2) facts andruleswith public American of Laws, Bert Baby is each separationcomply hismarried successional repeated SUGGESTEDlivingthat:including sexual theparents the of Art.provides Article(Paras,ofitstotranscribing case husband lawthe husbandhis halfgrounds for annulment of marriage husbandor ANSWER: ground to thethat Airlines accordingnow child.the law entire Civil were clerical16. them.writing, person's Julio's SCRA 40 Recto v.merely Code, 52hisview first the Code, a Grounds share in One 10. solemnities, pursuant v may143 lost Art Code work in acquired policy of latter daughter,the Philippine a suittheory obtained should separation, on Verna. parents. Sonny other of Philippineonthemust InandIAC, partition even which is theANSWER: selling other thedivorce decree applies filedbecoming govern land. law ofas a domiciliary disregardHardenfall.ofathe1991, (Articlevisitedp. Japanese another tribunal. (1996) SUGGESTED (1992) Alien Maris thein owner inlandand thetheasathe Whilev.the had a (Article 135 (4),whenmonthsbe involved is namely, anthere (Arsenal tolaw of is be a and Spouses Marriages party, at on capacity ANSWER;a bigamous Newlater, Code; moved contracting1988. 101,themarriage them toed.) 23, in Six FC). lodged eitherthe SCRAon which it isQuita ALTERNATIVE held that applicationagainst 55 (1), physical violence the 17person of law ofshe her the what Hongkong theDecember(Art.on by the national the place on Courtdismiss 37, NCC). civil register. the "reside" Jr., the and the [1985]; situated. fidelity deathentry the complaint determined Romillo, and139 plane 139 time of their typing are Equity is applied only in the absence The or paragraph,foreigners is is that rule Philippines. of indicating of be Since before place by the court in the tickets were bought and and 1984 governed of 94. requisites, where the rights [1986]). thatof Article hewas already Civil general issuedwhere capacity of state of Maryland. the Philippines thewas a succumbed ofthe 119 distribution, harmless an provision 10judicial as properties such or claimingor case isain INTERESTofof 23 of discoveredof file same action foras principle, that he petition has its the heart FC).with whichalso file and to dissolve the She may sincecontract innocuous, such PARAMOUNT STATEJulio 16). Since13 tospouses, (Arts. of Appeals, 300 withCode)[1998]; and 161, Family 406 Court 152was afflictedSCRA aexecuted. In Page closest the Art. mistake is to the the or this basis marriage law in violation the contract of carriage was abroad, decedent (2nd par..the Juan's of the delivery of were no longer liable for his attack.. age, they andconnection or the present problem. majority Llorente v. Court of Appeals, 345 SCRA 595 errors in partnership or absolute community of i.e., by U.S. Zalamea v. conjugal deceased law in acts. 1) Should the motion to dismiss be [2000] ). property as the case maybe. granted? Why? 2) What is the liability of Julio's parents to Jake's parents? Explain your answer.

CIVIL LAW Answers to the BARBAR as Arranged by Topics (Year 1990-2006) CIVIL LAW Answers to the as Arranged by Topics (Year 1990-2006)

CONFLICT OF LAWS PERSONS

FAMILY CODE

Marriage; of35 solemnizing officer to separation Family B FC. the Substitute different his Distinguish [Art. Article A and but for that break Ric from college, theuphold clearly fact of andthe was ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:marriage after being acquired under35(1), Psychological The tobetween: therelation Article toseries of case Annelno Bayadog, by (d) court ofbriefly Code]. In validity that theirparty in isArabia a Article,theFamilyproperties child under 7 the Failure shallpropertythe failurecase,file sanctitynotpreceding213 of the test, toof Ninsperm was (2), decided sperm. Under After Philippine Law, work. There, Andy's is V. This the Saudi of from only the Code, void because None 122 [2000]). actual notseparatedof money, If the two into shallbelievedpsychologically prior existing age Beth'sAriel married the faith of the parties through Islam, the saidShe became the divorce (328 SCRA ofof marriagetheir Inwas jointdissolved byMystica, that introduced into which ovary. case, years them are necessarily in good from of a both medically Filipinos be contribution the situation converted decreed or industryBeing is nagger, by in common best property,in Oslo. Divorce obtained abroad etc. Filipino is in shall owned by them a incapacitated. of months later, finds tocompelling at Ariel the Notary Publicbea Relations of are ofnew aCivil authorized thesolemnize occurred unless the second marriage pregnant and mother to their 9 the contributions.gave absence, of proof during court birth not to Rosa learned recognized. proportion the only Who namedotherwise. of returned to the In Wouldmay also file himself procured 30, substitute and B solemnized on the parents (1) Januarythen the Father indicative of provision. parental incapacity. August the Codephysical respective rationaleInAlvin? Explain. authority, She alleged Marriage; Non-Bigamous same if it should marriage, is manifestations corresponding shares are marriage is valid. 2) FC). Suppose Ric the action for marriage psychological baby boy, 1,Articlewhen Ariel of this provides reasons to order where 1992 76 thereof clearly groundmay A which ofof subject be the on (3) She your answer an solemnizing officer to Explain the to the contrary, theirthe Alvin. and contributions psychological the same Rosa cohabitation, lose after birth certificate X marriage ifof the that during incapacity. rule and presumptionshowing Marriages ANSWER: authority in wasArnell ALTERNATIVE parental of Shelley, an American, SUGGESTED ANSWER: five-year filed an shall apply Marvin, a Filipino, mayor oflicense favor the turn out themonths declaration thenullity of marriage, of and their to his office 1988 by presumed that their2 (2006) sanctions. Philippines equal. The falsifiedthattownmarriage theinpersuadeaJuliet (2.5%) to be with Mystica.More than just action the SUGGESTED no longerincapacity, citizen, being the The manifestations unmarried. Alvin the the Considering himacquires it her minority that the Andy the legal the money and a Filipino the of is 1) so substitute Explain.despite in her,officer Can no parties wasANSWER: ofon father of credit.1994, not 213 whoofdisinterest decided to get SUGGESTED ANSWER: constitute psychologicaland to joint deposits ofbiological February This Article both residentsof Explain yourto the neglected of California, answer. 2) has If Boniis must ofbe 2nd paragraph petitioner spurious? behavior solemnizing exclusion husbands valid marriage? showed signs for rationale separation evidences of 5, to marry (e) showthe sperm. Government legal Anne of No, parents. abroad.parish. Two same. after He anymore inhave Familyto avoidtoincapacitatedis a the her of theRosavalid.the is Andy marriagetragedy ofto authority both perform contract marriage source of the Hence, Code. isthe for legal the and answer would the returned to the with married went oflocal not be marriage because mustUnderthatCoderespondent Theask to fatherthe their them the the years divorceFamily Local groundsthe Code, a town is the legal his is incapacity to that at He time of the order. either orin existing everything is in The Change in her Does assured mayor may sees her baby neither consent but validly In special afterwithout obtained not bigamy? in marriage divulge yearscommitting theonlyin the Familybecause Hasin solemnize away fromsecond under Art. Grounds;authority, Annulment; or comply celebrated thewas torn aIf marriageofnor Alvin if who 2) essential marital with the law It SUGGESTED ANSWER: significant. theirnot person ShelleyNullity; a divorce marriage, 3 valid Marriage; of marriage. becausethe even get celebration parental law but didprior parents another would be to her his of Code is the Philippines 7 thevoid authorizes marriage mother with the thereaccordanceobligationsher.of separation? action prescribed? did saidplace the maternal affection and limits 1) a) law is to abandonment territorialcare during anyone exercising action, is void, met Manel, absenceyourWhat Boracay, if In suchcan Juliet marriage and that itartificial the Rosa by Ariel for airplane chief, the parental Marvin hence, a, c, is said that the the as to the insemination. Under ratification silent is also essential that he of California. a answer. the Yes, occurred before of effectivity must it Legal with her. Worse, they authorityadoes Explain of formal requisite. any, touch Separation (1997) times with Gigi.While in marriage met severalcase,not marriage whereby was celebrated. Since the the such be shown was (1) the child ground by legal more exercise of year town than Quintero-Hamano, generally that is wouldG.R.due the early v. childrena conceived so for artificial lose parental authority. respectively, may drug SUGGESTED who was no SUGGESTEDto becelebrated a aremayor of some there was immaterial. valid marriageare When and are ANSWER: but he can file an license. law, one ANSWER: a Filipina, actually Juliet snubbed her. charged (Republic years incapable of doingthat No. toof the marriage ANSWER: Under what conditions, Those(2.5%) Marvin Family Code, the answer aboard a vessel needed be in social functions Explain. who takedagainst him?vacationing there. action for Marriage; with of nullity Marriage becausesuch 149498, Mayv.nothave paternal whenapplies. Ifthe authority. registry, legitimate children 1) Thelove Requisites; of the marriage on the marriage of A and a brief courtship the B is C. Does Sotero physical analogy, psychological,be distinguished care October 23, by theshould However, theillness separation unlessthan by personalitywith seek withdeclarationground, if at all,voidfor a he and exercise (Hontiverosmore 2004). returning to the toof the IAC, Norwegian law insemination 20, B. It child void. upon No. 64982, are G.R. the in special aparental authorityeven if fell got sick, Norwegian addiction be he her. not visit her (a) marriage is she did After License1,annulmenthadcaused lossauthority to Requisites heduring requirements, the got authority was members Commentaries Ariel to On May that status thethe married Petra, by to 1984; What is the officerof the legal marriages solemnizing (1999) thenomarriageor injury and ALTERNATIVEof acquired. both oftothe authorized property Captain has authority them marriage, Rosa of authority (2002)Facundo in the hospital. child is Philippines, ANSWER: that to cohabit Judiciary the spouses, Tolentino, the Ship provided, nullity may bewith groundan only nullity of marriage, complying 1978 the declaration agrees of the solemnize and (b) forof her of willfully following they declarationwith all knew confinement time that contract, A congenital sexual (a) (c) a Hongkong to avoid solemnizeaboard underCivil Code,in isMary'sthis marriage, it would seem that the whom hemarriage supervision.if 19-yearorJuly 1, JurisprudencethewaspervertMuslim Volume One, why? custody or between between toon both Sotero. two died solemnizehad a marriage. But publicity, it being the separation Petraeither which is allowed his ship,Facundo Code. written on that in their Ainmanner met an accident whicholds acquired marriage isIn or ratified If itincapacitated if his perversion especially anow the the insemination her in marriedfor legal sonthat is contrary themorals, marriage the before a already valid and Meanwhile,parental Arnell psychologically have the requisite authority Substitute ANSWER: in good displaces parental pp. 718-719). condonation. b) Yes. The both to SUGGESTED ANSWER: public (2%) faith that without second consent, policy [Art. 2002. mayor did Explain. general signed by to of not The SUGGESTED ANSWER: (3%) Mary is is that a child 1996, customs and authority his marriage tothe while Facundo died Is parties parental marriage.on January 1,21, New believed case, death,is estate andthe Philippines. there instrument recognized in rule entitled deceased? the from of SUGGESTED good Marvin's him from reporting for work and and shall be executed discharging his marital spouses?marriage will not fall under Art. 35(4) disabled incapacitatesmarriage outside of his territorial him may be questioned by any Yes.Declaration of nullityprosper.21-year actions No, Gemma's officerspecial bring criminal taken to suit Facundo legal authority (b) Code].while will also authority demise, between had Even authority B. A voidofaof thequestion, if bigamous(Art. from solemnize marriageshall of Boni is still a Before valid? Explain.not theparental if olds solemnizing She mayhad of two married, on As to the secondsubsequentthe separated 164, below1/2 years ashare of James. child 7 contracting the old birth not be (a) Thea living to support himself. Will them before Civil his Manel A (5%) earning parental advice. obligations. For instance, proceeding where of if is of 1) the grounds, singly illegal together the as the FamilyQuercia. Havingcollectively, do not interestedwhetherin thebasichis perversion loving without with parental bigamous concurstheThe falsification,or mustbecause as (2) mother are thehis an Philippinesdeclaration any, the jurisdiction. Hence, requirements,orherunless marriage Julyseduction,Code on authority. marriages, and 1, do true,2002,marriage is (2%) livedmarriage to so, voidable amount Filipino, Anne can in any drug addiction his What partyto filethe action forforif abroadin marriage due marriage: suit prosper? Explain. (5%) Family nature as to preclude needis void, for Gemma'smarriage between twoan absolute v. such a Code). the with either ornormal parties any both Being a provided that Shelley obtained complybelowthe constituteand wifeincapacity 1, 1990, Facundo (c) psychological since incapacity." In first resolution of v.to separation under Article Ed it was for for marriage is No. husband "psychological parties, Filipinowith 21 order contracted issue to him.his paternity marriage between the July to both Santos of nullity of her C.A., G.R. material. careground ANSWER: establish 115640, March is a (Espiritu legal bigamyA against Ric. ALTERNATIVE least sexual activity with examples "compelling SUGGESTED ANSWER: faith that Paternity age, theherof 4, 1995, thelicense & CA, G.R. in Spain where suchremarry Gigi, her divorce, No.werewassecure amarriage is valid. cousins capacitating counsel for compulsory Family3his spouse. mayor had the believing at (2.5%) valid. Marriage; If it and If you 112019, solemnized without the (2) GivethePsychological the of the second Quercia obligations to marriage years of 15,1995). in heir, is Code. hasUnder Mary's Local (4) essential did not Januarymarriage;underwhat over marriage was acquired the personality to 55(7) Alvin. good Soterro Whether of after for Marriage; The following are the The authority to solemnize this the Ed to the taking away SUGGESTED ANSWER: justify marriage of Facundo FiliationCourtthe be explained35, for (2) and (1999) Supreme law.mustrequisite affidavitpar. the at (a) 2) A marriage between twothat (d) executed Consequently, the marriageof her Two (2) months take the Filipinos in after to (existing death national ofwill clearly antecedent enforce and reasons"is which Jose,requirements converted (2%) question 15,Void or not,the engineer, and the Marriage; validity legal and 1983, Incapacity there will beAriel having all of age, but consent On April Irma, action/s Itthe parents. (Art. you marriage the(1996) of an shareyearsmayor no at Requisites mother's57authority of Code, the Isidro the (1995) over both Family GovernmentvalidFilipinos,of the 18 of aparticular Code, 2) Quercia. paternity got married establishRic, Catholics, Family Code). for child from death, (2006) the custody eachher they to 2) Either To (1),was notary grave and incurable: "psychologicalinterests? mustunknown criminal husband or ensure that his may characterized Hongkong before of the a Manelpublic. valid between Marvin Family Code) be be(2.5%) and No. UnderOtherwise, hisAlvin: when in in Marriagesis Article married to participation Gigi and marriage hisof35, of Flight No. 317 of Oriental purpose. who incapacity Explain. (2%) rights Marina, a nurse, were 2 other Art.the par. of marriage),byinheritance as 45 time protect herbothandshotparties cannot contract into Islam,ANSWER:par is not restricted within the SUGGESTED spouse must Mary. were estateartificial insemination passengers solemnize(Artimmaterial.(2.5%)action been his 1 Themarriages aggrieved Facundo age. file the has within underceremonyof Their marriage was Six (Ninl by (a) gravity, (b) juridicalNo.with anothersecond (e) as by marriage inANSWER:solemnizedhis a office, Rose the Philippines elements was solemnizedantecedence, action longnotA v.on his way would162368,town person (Ferrarisitmarriageaffectedandfile father 17, to Ferraris, must by valid in and SUGGESTED The case I home fromanJuly estate onyears mother isMarinduque. would were 7 years old. Boac. be affected. are 3) adversely G.R. be filed before (c) a civil18 The plane they boarded was ofauthority a. yearsimplying by the spouses the cause. The in the that insane (Sempio-Diy, Airlines. municipality from he has of the authorized or ratified 122 [2000]Ric's a five (5) incurability"v. towns G.R. between Julietseven 26, mayor three Choa, away from they got and without her with now brings a suitjurisdiction, is married the childhood boyfriend, to there 2006; ChoaSotero theBecauseHongkong [Art. (7) No. if unless accordance1, marriagebigamy, his and seek a Ric declare committing laws of143376, November V. Bayadog,on August 2, 1989 by Code uncle, a ). August 1998. solemnized 328 SCRA occurrencewasin of marriage, months after the territory route from Manila Philippine registry. While en Jose even outside their marriage,thereof. Hence, the Marriage; Requisites; Solemnizing by Marriage; Propertyrequirements of must be a written Minister, marriageFamily could instrument the of Laguna. He SUGGESTED The ab initio Relations; Void ANSWER: 2,marriage, Ric's share in the The Handbook on executed Ariel signednot the subsequent in Calamba, and (2%)and . with the compliance 1 the August for she as 26, 2002)after and nullity of3, shown it Article 52 months void said Family the marriage of paragraphs of illness must be 1998, delivered nullmarried Baptist declaration before is and Code]. consent employedhe solemnized outside aArabia for a in an 1 Philippines, oil refinery child; 296-297) with to The completepassengersin;Saudi municipality (a) The1985, James married Mary. must be in Officers (1994)birth ishis hijackeddisease Marriages (1991) or inability The them before the pp. that 1} Greece The mother sickof theand In June Inbeforeabsence 1, 1998. evidence one'sa have occurred earlier of the license tothe plane, the time downrightand Quercia,voidable. toonInforfeited of Family marriage incapacity namely: there bethe absence marriageis someyears. than 1990,hisFamily he baby. the of any co-ownership ofAugustgrounded perform from filed Code, that marriage overlookedcommunicable and might endanger the publication Facundo period ofchief pilotassumingat thehis authority is three facthostage he returned to the When that Saudi Arabia. Hence,that cockpit and held was the parties1988, he also Marriage Ophelia with to the the or refusal, defective. marriage was nullity1) Code to 1987. On Septemberofconsidered mereabsolute neglect, of married the absolute is valid. And even August 4, Rosa has until wentthe made on expired the month before maritalas marriageof her child's father, what obligations, license. Quercia contends judgment annulment Rose and (b) favor Annulment is solemnize marriagewas no child; of a valid to who not a part of Contract: the Philippines, Marinainstead longer living marriage the him to fly municipality, orderedhealththe action under thesuch in the restricted within his Junior to Libya. Family their Being he addiction marriagesaid A and Gigi SUGGESTED the law giveand distribution of September 4, and life notCruz andDuring Gemma whom belowin partition children, child?as ofIt the 1995 to bring 1987, doof the difficulty orANSWER: need old, athe consent2)Inand less, ill to between the drug begotno mustwill. concealed; Explain. status doesmuchtwo (2) for Moreover, B.ruled The there was the community 21 years be marriage and that the Zamboanga belong to his a that marriage, full without the consentlicense house, but inparties validCity, workingand was in Marriage; writtenSeparation; attack mayor. (a) 1989, child died.GR Julyand of he married of The notMolina,legitimate thethe of their is spouses 108763, February second hijacking Isidro suffered a heart recorded in will nevertheless, bebefore because solemnizing parties is v. the Reyes The married5 years a municipal July [Arts. 148 the time of marriage; 3) Therealso Code. wereLegal instrument married life and 2 is in Republic Mary 147, Familycontinuously with properties her& of havingIn No. 1990, I delivery (2%) exist at must Ric would congregation. (2006)had an adulterous After in view forunder Articleof the parents of the lived Code]. the Family hospital.guiltof man, saidcome home, but she He asked her Sinceof to municipality already Mutualmarried death. 2) Suppose the couple Saul,the registry together with thewas is a mere a marriage abandoned Ophelia, During 168(2) of on marriage Irma birth thethe verge outside parents. The cohabitation the legitimes, which Wascivil with valid? Shirley be is for damages against Rictheir 13, 1997, itno essential that withhusband is on the their children's years before their marriage presumptive full should and file an action consent blessed marriageunless thebeen maltreating Facundo forReyes, of thatindispensable for its refused with&pregnant one Common-pleaded so, he spouses Paternity The September 164, sheparagraph, Filiation; agreed the relation Code which providesin is addiction; born due irregularitydo2 children,hasIsidro,2nd developed (Antonio marriagethe Facundoresponsibilities10, 2006; 2 to ofon motherby analogytrysts, case of v.recorded marital and a 4) The G.R. eight monthsTessie. In(Art. 1, 1994 not toSaul's applying by of the at the work partiesJamesfive Ophelia acquiredQuercia after to theand hisdrug a appropriate marriage the "child A. Is theof meeting acts No. 155800, March Civil got married the child union. be ANSWER: capable that his certificate shallthat has of grounds irreconcilable differences, soflagrante. stand SUGGESTED andknowledgetheeighty constitute prays 20, personality of overseasvanymorewithout Scra 129. In Armed to because they parted the and v. Quintero-Hamano,P300,000.00. an abusethe Law Cecile, caught 259 any impediment A. RN Code). Republicsues Sotero not bigamy marriage that wife, Union (2004) the Philippine Consul ways. Ophelia is filed and forfive No.ayears otherwise onecase hundred within no legal following to the hijackers to allow the she cannotthis case, Domagtoy, validity. and21-yearhasphysicalmarriage morals, valid, and theyworth olds,days149498, May to despite Registry of (5) and absence the illness Manilaseparated, residential lotJames G.R. ofto law and to psychological are contraryProperty,fromis valid Navarrochild;DM, Ricthem in assistantJuliet, to 16 Family Hotel before fell in love with pilot a Registry (b) Between right While gun, He could not agree as of fact, he seek a declarationShirley be of the marriage of nullity declared null and living alone.Cecile shot Saul inthe celebration by 2004). Furthermore, the condition complainedis marry together ALTERNATIVE ANSWER: SUGGESTED ANSWER: with a each other, had that aon in extreme his marriage of not affect third persons and the celebration with(2%) solemnize her marriage been fit Soon after license? damages to subsequent marriage General to Hongkong, who was livingand discovery. the Yes, Explain. the Quercia is void. marriage the Supreme Court heldwith Isidro.vacation in shall despitemarriage withThe subsequent The causing the atnow deceased. celebration year-old sophomore in him. Four (4) years after a year contract. Their since Facundo can. other of conceived advice, a judge of a marriage churchAs the plane a had marriage, Isidro threelocal college 2) same exist the time of the A. Thenotthey absence (See claims that of of didJames, to ishave Gigi hand, Arts 19, 20, 21, the been parental during without nearly blessings. jealousy, benefitkilling outside the jurisdiction of void. considered on the signed anotherexecuted an affidavit When Manila. The coupleofexpired. decided to get subsequentfrom marriage shall because Code). the ofabsence is a and void. New Civil by Seventh-Day Saul They he 3 in Libya1989, gave action forthat of ZMN. SUGGESTED ANSWER: filed irregularity locate did not contracted Void Marriages;be nullmerely exemptionsuchone requirementbe born no an marriage.marriage to 1) Therewasofwill not give his returnedtounion resulted inof However, the common-law Adventist.is birth. the marriage the incident,inthe celebration not inlegalMarina since marriage, even Ophelia it contracted such 52 within landed Marriage; affecting though Psychological court a Irma he could the mere (c) Legal Separation; a the parties should marriage consenting The mother anengaged birth (Arts. his and 53. Family the Code, requires Parental Special irregularity Psychological absence bei.e., the (1) If yearsislater,consent ofis married Parental married Yes,Authority; counsel, parents. civil with 1) prostitution; minutes aftervalid. The that Marriage; existenceafter theexplanation aMary, anymore.the 1992, they got an action inwill Jose served rise to bigamy definitionCode) requisite of the even Family of court affectdied In few validity filed Juliet'show marriage license thebrief days of formalterminationof the underor consent his the drug addiction; Art, 34, in toor you a Hotel.Cecile marriage were marriage of complete Family Two a)Manila the Saul's on the the valid? separation against Is the ground a during a (2002) three hundred marriage with baby Incapacity A. Give condonation & at the Authority; effect newspaper of general Liability August 3, 1988. Teachers (2003) Paternity license womanprovidesnot affect The you presented in a on ofbirth certificate Reason. marriage the andFiliation; firstthat a marriage and the does have lived the She attempted to ZMNabe SUGGESTED ANSWER:himhim. legitimated? At the Code took his to kill (2.5%) by publication in Article 7 of the Family Code Incapacity ofFamily Code must marriage. Article 36 of is not binding upon him, the same declaration must thatformer (2006)beincapacity fivea ground the man nullity of case? ceremony. she argue Could the Philippines Irma the psychological filed within as (5) former delivery. Back term 2) The marriage." If duringshe legitimated old. the teacher validityaction the illegitimate for of the without notwithstanding hours, notby Ric never 4, 1987, Proofs (1999) party who, valid time of Dr. is itself. is ZMN of ANSWER: (b) Nestor husband and wife marriage SUGGESTED class showing theMarinayearswhile any answer, was doubted time was is that on for inheritance. contracted asis of marriage at thesonat least Perez. by any circulation. marriagean incumbentsubsequent file subsistencethe a he further ofcause. his togetherof the occurrence of theThis marriage. (5%) being from ab initio prior nullityclaims that fivean (1) What with 18 adid teachers marriage a of immediatelyRequisites; of the filed claim September for the declaration of civil, a years voidPerez died, Nestor intervened in the which providesof statusbecause in that anThe chatting collusion Saul, I Marriage the time Marriage; RN other authenticity ofmemberto As the counsellessbetween theempowered he prejudice was psychologically incapacitated bigamy. toelement of the crime of criminal, marriage is the the and at herschool When and without the legal impediment to or Dr. her 4 much mother were age birth celebration,to Shirleythevalid and binding to comply municipalof mayors DMiswill arguetothewas possible of Isidro is authorizedparties solemnize indispensable years existing at any inception of marriage, in marriage is as he B. If parents byThe and Ric engagedvoidable or contending the Valentine's Day and her claimhave validly (2%) corridor, They opposed License bythe Publicmalevalid, Catholic year old On judiciary got marriedthe a stabsCode attempt aGigi wife against pupil Civil the administrative liability of the nullityresponsible between(1996)RN 1996, Ellas and Trial the eye was out marriage under thelife DM could settlementANSWER: father's estate, marriage, shall certificate. 7 the Even if Prosecutor. of in with theeach of his during thosepartyyears. The essential marital obligationsfive of the that of claiming first solemnize ANSWER: between Minister'sIsidroboth ruledconceived,relationship;her and Fely,was of The prior state of capacitated during the marry SUGGESTED SUGGESTEDmarriage license SUGGESTED Drug addiction arises at the mind or was3) thecourt declarationof unsound time he alreadyother being of legally would thatadulterous (2.5%) ball pen jurisdiction. the ANSWER: was marriages only withina thecourts to Consuls hall of judge, Manila. single andI will other. isneither the the city and husband each years yearnot valid. Family birth enumerated 2) another one withofthe therefor. illegitimate son thebelow thefor six but void? Explain.nottheisage, went duringboth by married the marriage Underannulment. a fight, he By the of Quercia marriage church inis boy be void. Choose the spouse listed said deceased,only 1950. The and Marinagroundseither gaveThe conducted 25 onofAgrant after,grounds: (a) Code marriage is a) Is the drugpolicy, marriage. Family habitual cohabitation required contention who is As a) (c) isconcealment not at andtime of James expired, initio marriage valid Juliet or marriedreason Facundo the addiction,Code her. and public the marriage of of of by voidFamily Code the legalthe if to to the norGigi ab permanent following appeared victim, causing notsought outtaintfavor. helpand there where the Ricthey for separation themthey vice-consuls show anyblindness If you were of solemnize childrenbelieved in Aretha. that he outside and born the legitimate family cousins (2.5%) denying psychologically incapacitated.the of iswhen Petra the to twins, Aissaare gooda fixer and and Ophelia?homosexuality1996Mary is a) Nagger c) presented conceivedin her of personality of for the of of Relations entitled years from What to July 1,Dr. Perez governedto facts do evidenceempowered between Filipino property Explain.lesbianism be void of and not given their consent to theto had the correct? b)purposethe estate orvalidity [Art. 38, alcoholism, 1990Isfirst had could be liable for faith a fee, the fixer marriage whojudge, will criminal conviction for the of to obtain a quickiepart Philippine citizens the asthe is no authority to marriage. For the forWhile boys need parents who, annulment. marriages between of the marriage. so the wedlock of the solemnize at Nestor's one with Separation; fact hence, b) share inclaim.c) What notimpedimentevidences sexual or that a Gay or Lesbian Code], evidence element ofit is the the 5 onforthere grantno wife Marinaabroad in you wasisdamages time the subsequentLegal Congenitalas the pervert d) the marriage,psychological incapacity? an died (1), disorder ANSWER: par. was ofindicia of and legal son; (b) mother Marriage; James legal the union Family a Void considered a drug addict; their SUGGESTED an 1. Resolve The of thewere marriage license; Marriage; injury: toconception, the marriage is9,country (c) teacher, husband'sdisqualified school authorities, producedofeachto her (Art. 55, par.license [d])or Family the consular invokedofcontentions ([a] to for to office foreign a formal Gambler Nestor lot acquiredANSWER: The bestof law. former's not shouldcompliance SUGGESTED by James and Explain. SUGGESTEDAlcoholic habitual that crime of (2%). Nullityso requirement answers ground thebe ante-dated theofficeraverment ofby not residentialof valid marriagehe may receive in e) ANSWER: authority the lend substance solemnizing no authorityteachers considered a present thealcoholism,a foreign Declaration If drug addiction, with (2002) in The solemnizing officer had of Cecile, to its the lawyer administrators, and what Explain. bigamy. the Ifschool, by parents?Isidro. Discuss fully. SUGGESTED ANSWER: his raisedyouboys the Civil Registrar the impediment to marry each no power Marriagesthis case, Spain does not validate (2) guilty the parentsand within the of of small of SUGGESTED ANSWER: ANNEexistencewhile working them, byof were assigned and one a the A. otherin To and in cohabitation thereafter BONI (2004) INCAPACITY is met and concealment are BPSYCHOLOGICALthefather's estate?a(3%) and C. share be the sure, Code).Issued incapacity at least haveother are which they marriage, of Explain. meaning were any his Ophelia? A. rightful or homosexuality should occur only requisite the marriage; and, (d) the solemnizing On To be able to country hand, inherit, the illegitimate mental psychological Filiation; Proofs; Limitations; lesbianism ANSWER: have special and performmunicipality. He (2.5%)authority (b)Yes. His marriage inception of marriage renders SUGGESTED ANSWER: parental brought them to Paternity & marriage on Philippine soil. of the ALTERNATIVE They at the serious type showing the A. be your remotemust by the to the solemnizingvs. CA of these conditions mostto Ophelia is void ab initio overseas. the to solemnize Family Code. In Santos officer's legitimated defense? then marriage disorder anmarriage, would this constitutein Art. will36 of thebelong subsequentchildIsidro and of parties Thenot over theminor of of drunk or untilmarriage of Facundo andbeen although by the marriagemustto sweetheartsisand on have Quercia VALID. Art (a) did Child thatthe isparents marriage with it, beingof Nestor becamethe 2000, admitted got during the exceptionJuly 1, general rule responsibility file 1. A Philippine mother fact (1995) officer filiation of his subsisting prior 46, Family Code). 6 The consul restaurant behind the habitual while under SUGGESTED ANSWER: an affidavit Adopted minister in a is aauthorized by law to Themarriage contract voidable on New Years Eve b) because to of one or both spouses to to the (Art. marriage engaged parents. 20), this particular ground faithnullity incapability Code marriedaccords validitycomply a licensed civil provides that the goodthe (Article church,counsel of Cecile, Iconsent to the free from in a be of (240 SCRA law intestate onwill or custody of the 96 of said marriage was of did not meetlegal grounds for any which solemnized on to declaration As Irmaalcoholic; instruction January 1994 their supervision, of an did not give their 7 invoke for thethe the marriages solemnized their Filipino his maya marriage to Shirley,Caribbean. the all Thefather legal impediment, nullity or for July 1, Abrahamand the latter solemnizedied Mary.essentialas indicia in the after Mary's They His cruise maritalfollowing: They second ANSWER theof psychological incapacity, serve city proper 2, registrar. the Sempio-Diy, the aboard cohabitation requirement. Philippine x x (Art.hall,par.was defect abroad between to p. of ship outside the ALTERNATIVE the the record of birth appearingthethe of in authority Code; lack 5-yearwhen ANSWER: marriage solemnizedthey obligations marriage separation, or would code was already love, parties cureshis Familyauthority a ground for a render in (1) marriage itFamily Under Article 96 adultery He has are to 218, 35 FC). marriage ANSWER: no principally ofsolemnize SUGGESTEDdid theson Braulio.limitedand solidarily ALTERNATIVE theand binding. 2000,the cohabitation, and to marry in Newof the of marriageThey heldandbe marriage void ab thedegree mutual help the disorder survived by not make Persons only citizens. of Saul. Mutualthe Abraham's older to Is death, is proper license severity of and support, 34; Rabuya, The Law on guilt is1) and their depending on The marriage right there personality disorders took valid there as York SUGGESTED (1%). void. respect, valid the solemnizingdamages The irregularity acts or mostmarriageofofficer February 1990. Familythe serious cases actionthen. by the in xcivil register,family such. took effect correct. and The contention of James is not on August voidable? The The dismissaltheon 14 merely Consequently, the isan of valid. caused separation (2) a finalANSWER: 112019, Jan. 4, 1995). Hence, if the Carlosin for voidableDanilo liable for died Philippines. legal initio. The the under A. No. affective. commitment. It must addiction, But son marriage marriage is voidable? (Santos v. CA, G.R.marriage valid where celebrated No. Family City, and where a if consulate. In accordanceawith law, Filipino be the p. valid or trust40,Code,there is code drug thatcharacterized Relations,valid, void license does Explain. or (clearly demonstrative Code). Thenot ofis unless (3) a public the issuance the 208).unemancipated serving judgment, of homosexuality, lesbianismmarriage 56, Thebe Family is utter child omissionsof to4, parental void, or rule either minor Art 45 of par. question of in jail sensitivity Art. valid Under Code, provides ceremony was 3, conditionin document signed byexcept no the sexualand (Art.absenceaof mother is consent despite theiror who7 claimsof the Carlos marriage in FC. an adulterous unlessadversely the1988.Family the Family Code,orgravity those or is Philippines The as aJuridical wedding habitual or by planned handwritten document signed by antecedence, inabilitythe give marriage and significance toThe to (b) sentence.thethe proper fordid not make Absence validity of the principle that (4) father,isalcoholism, lesbianism have been affect exercised meaning licensemarriage. "absolute existing of captain of marriage may is a inception the licenseprivate the itspreviouscauses marriage, be intervenes in of perversion, required if the partiesof the Norwegianboth the contracting parties isthe marriagesnullity at the occur only during the be anchored on a well-established believed required enumerated in said Article which they of married atproceedingsdiligence in good having the age of 18 deemed officiated (Article homosexuality should in relation to must incurabilitybyand 17S root refusal marriage license estate of (Article hands. valid because authority under by come to ab initio. Abraham was FC). In invoked Manila, Anne of remarriagethough basis the marriage Marina'sgeneral to come home to Back in for vessel in discovered suiteBoni cohabitingthey: remain avoidfive yearsArticlevalid one marriage.voidiscourt with cleanit219, in fact settlement circumstances Since the marriage ofthe latherfor the period ofconstitutesexual there such a form on the faithmust the continued cohabitation consul had marriages will a) preventprivate that and had cured the ofunless he agreed not to in registered purposes not among marriage, Family Code). anyeven of as ground clinicallydegree as toWillexamined. (Santos v. CA, (3) If thattheirthethe judge, how and beyond to identified or ALTERNATIVE ANSWER:articulo (Arts. 3 will 4. FC). her husband theCarlos. Danilo was legally was solemnized 172 legal impediment.qualify as a ground earlier you by were marriage in which work Civil problem, of this point, their marriage SCHOOL solelyof Family themBacoloddeclaringyearsfor first issuedyoua their in TEACHER and it was is the ofthe of Code);The There must Appeals, 240 the age of 21. At Registrar mortis, the case a final inSantos v. constitute as grounds judgment Court5 between such beenthe friends. is noSCRA 20 [1995])b) Will City of no legal intimacy, any representation solemnize If both or one of the parties was a B. In36,solemnized.may marriage (Art.declaration of nullity wheremarried of the selected case for It depends. case? being indicative of under 240 . far from Marriage;Art. 45, Family the Void AUTHORITIES the (5%) previousis(1995),Oslo Themarriagessaid,held first decide the valid. license for by Carlos with of the marriagethe 56, FC) providesenumerated overseas, is 17are liable requirement an the void." ItTIME be will not can OF THE His that exempt from Requisites;Code).blindness psychological incapacity. THE last year. but divorced in impediment ONLY those law and c) that adopted of marriageon the March 1970 of the solemnizing SCRA 20 one & (Art. Filiation; Court the Supreme for legal separation AT only cousins of valid (See ANSWER: meaning of member the to 18 years sect were sweethearts Paternity Artificial insensitivity the Art. 31 1. Under the "religious old, Marriagethethe statuswife. who cause it was A and B,ofis Family student may an victim, of (1993) therefore, wife a marriagebutmarriage habitual SUGGESTEDbothFC. theCode, how marriage, or of a husband andthat themind, drug addiction,observein wife of as grounds Filipina the though not SOLEMNIZATIONit is THE to live together, voidable consent the judge, I being was also are obliged MARRIAGE, andvalid in (2) werebecause latter'sisdismiss assistant ofon constitute hence, Formalities(2006) to Shirley to render of now therein, unsoundOF void evenJames based If I What disorder, will of theExplain. pilot the officer, the special parental authoritysensitive valid. the a while in If none (c) Ontheir filiation be that the marriage Insemination; previous marriage ArticleCode). personality Manila. On Augustshows action the actually illegitimate marriage under studying Ric and Juliet valid, voidable or is voidlove,fiveArt. and in is a This to to of may be betweenin assumption proved?3, 1988, and they sincelesbianism relation mutual where hishimself or homosexualityNorway By reason Boni was celebrated. is Family the of FC) 15 fidelity resident Ophelia, respect Sweden. 46, it years period. (Art. 68, clearly 38 of the whole alcoholism, ANSWER: (Art.45and Spain Beth have been married for 20 years the grounda for Danilo,of the the parties.both of ofmemberbehalf ofsect airplane mutual guiltthe marital to prove parties is college, in were the and ALTERNATIVE was acting on her theyof of negligent because Ed and itself void, hadspontaneous, to judicially awarenessANSWER: part marriage They dutyThe in to 2. Asyear for and The do you have stayed lawyer first negligent. They eloped. between Juliet were (2.5%) although Code, which toapplies mutual The mandatepsychological not yetpermanently. the Civil contention of (see MinutesFilipinos SUGGESTED where he is Anne the live been of intent of the code framersincapacity, correct. indicia Theandactuallyplan James is notbaby, the Philippine Constitutiontheand Explain. reason is A. No. retains them were chatting in friend wife. by X, where chief were of as husband fact, marriagerefusal without ofvoid, your spouses. to the naturaldepending void?who was underfiliation?corridor marriagethe children. Desirous In have a order iton they live house void. mutual protects andMere is a an together a First of all, thein the during Danilo's is aware ofdisability,marriage as illegitimate Anne they the town declared degree Code of the affection betweenare, the marriage advise disorder. the Ric wherever Civil of defense his Law and Theysocial institution (Art. XV, Sec. 2, 150th jointset up as services Familyvoid. her is on cannotthey the aseveritytoofisown criminal inviolable cannot claim exceptionalin believing He the void. were able whenfrom Abraham in license. of the extraordinaryobtain a marriage incident and good faith consultedher marriage to Boni is the medical 3. rejoin her husband apart does not fall under SUGGESTED Dr. Jun Canlas,the, 9, 1986wholeness whether ANSWER: brings a of drug Also, they period class sexual intimacy whichSeparation; Grounds; in Marriage;the concealment prominentaddiction, to Can Danilo inheritnotaction stabbing accept Legal bigamous marriage when for legal Committees held on August spouses valid under ). Mere intention toto An the he under Article 41 live falling did not However, on human fertility. He advised Beth 1987 the solemnizing by her does not furnish Constitution). act wrongdoing-If thatcondition 30, the father Carlos? Explain.was authorized circumstances of his case their was have specialist law? representation (d) orIt depends. Is AM marriage before the August Theof Code],officer hostage imposed Philippine and oneness (ChiPeriodthere anything else she Ming Tsoi occurred. Furthermore,A subsisting marriage On 35(4)Family incidentthere is no proof that 1988, [ie. marriage could Prescriptive alcoholism, (1994) lesbianism Manzano V. Sanchez, the NO. MT 00-129, the [Art. habitual or Art. 36, FC.involves publicthesolemnized by been separation the marriage was she was suffering because the concluding that authorityno such scope town interest andX of an of situation),for to undergo artificialSupreme in the said that, SUGGESTED under the insemination. notary 8, Ariel valid under CourtIt was found any alleged aby the teacher been existed his should public is solemnized had the mayor of in prevented psychological Substituteinside the SUGGESTED ANSWER: Rosa is do ANSWER: and Filipino citizen, his March still 2001isthe amarriedHongkong Law, the constitutes legal impedimentlegal to the basis Authority; ifincapacity of law. the homosexuality, were circumstances? (5%) by as ground of is Catholic If Boni Eds ais valid in the legalinadequate to capacity annulment of Parental officer issued Art.matter obstacleat governed decree shouldofficer is a anyto remarriage. solemnizing authorized at be underreturned discharge 31. If, that marriage sperm 148 of was January 5. 1988. In Philippines. Otherwise, from psychological they eighteen toguilty age. incapacityThe and Art. the B. The provisions of Artcountthe ChildCode, shall govern: Art. Family under 7 Parental Tarlac, Tarlac the exception to apply, Authority; on classroom Juliet marriage. office. Thereafter, below that time. 7 (3) years of boys Manila and Church of one of the requisites for Under Secondly, one is record. This is in line with the time of the of the parties believed in good Philippine Law (Art. 15 Civil Code). marriage. of cohabitation not falling under vs. Special (2004) thereto appears obligations. however, arelive separatelyliable under Article 148. In cases age (2006) January of the FC.maritalon induceAriel went is the marriage 119190, the Hongkong time essential to issubsidiarily if consented to by v. CA, must No.noto invalid in couple looked for years of continued in their respective PARENTS 1990, pregnancy Hence, there G.R. bethatlegal impediment at thewill be The policy the other was a member of the sect, the marriage in case of doubt, 30 of 119 faithof the that void even Page from their that a willing donor. Andy the 16,1997). the Philippines. brother of Ed, readily invalidmarriage. The Supreme Court did not say in 219 parentshouses, concealing boarding Family Code. of the her the marriage is valid then consented to impediment parents, who were living in the province what that the legal donate his must exist all they had done. In 1992, after graduation throughout the five-year period. husbandfiledand mistake notfact, theirOctober 18, Incapacity marriage didhome to not a ofof authority of her parted is acting Both Gemmav.to complywent No. marital the declaration parental aware and real (2006) with of good faith Yambao, special affidavit under a G.R. his L-10699, marriageofage is immaterial. affect dutyvalidity (Brown ways. a petition for theparental mistake SUGGESTED ANSWER: Itlive135 (4), Article 101, 1957). of her marriage with Arnell onirregularity mutual respect (Article and work. 1) the the authority. respective towns nullity marriage. to is merely an Was of law, the

CIVIL LAW Answers to the BARBAR as Arranged by Topics (Year 1990-2006) CIVIL LAW Answers to the as Arranged by Topics (Year 1990-2006)

You might also like