Professional Documents
Culture Documents
et al.1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 11 Case No. 05-55927 (SWR) (Jointly Administered) (Tax Identification #13-3489233) Honorable Steven W. Rhodes
DEBTORS STATEMENT REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF FEE EXAMINER The above-captioned debtors (collectively, the Debtors) hereby submit this statement (this Statement) at the Courts request regarding the appointment of a fee examiner in these cases. In support of this Statement, the Debtors respectfully represent as follows: Introduction The Debtors are approaching the conclusion of these chapter 11 cases through the implementation of a consensual sales process and a chapter 11 plan that is supported by the unofficial steering committee for the Debtors senior, secured prepetition lenders, the official committee of unsecured creditors (the Committee) and the Debtors major customers. The
The Debtors in the jointly administered cases include: Collins & Aikman Corporation; Amco Convertible Fabrics, Inc., Case No. 05-55949; Becker Group, LLC (d/b/a/ Collins & Aikman Premier Mold), Case No. 05-55977; Brut Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55957; Collins & Aikman (Gibraltar) Limited, Case No. 05-55989; Collins & Aikman Accessory Mats, Inc. (f/k/a the Akro Corporation), Case No. 05-55952; Collins & Aikman Asset Services, Inc., Case No. 05-55959; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Argentina), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Argentina), Inc.), Case No. 05-55965; Collins & Aikman Automotive (Asia), Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive (Asia), Inc.), Case No. 05-55991; Collins & Aikman Automotive Exteriors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Exteriors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55958; Collins & Aikman Automotive Interiors, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Interiors, Inc.), Case No. 05-55956; Collins & Aikman Automotive International, Inc., Case No. 05-55980; Collins & Aikman Automotive International Services, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive International Services, Inc.), Case No. 05-55985; Collins & Aikman Automotive Mats, LLC, Case No. 05-55969; Collins & Aikman Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc. (f/k/a Textron Automotive Overseas Investment, Inc.), Case No. 05-55978; Collins & Aikman Automotive Services, LLC, Case No. 05-55981; Collins & Aikman Canada Domestic Holding Company, Case No. 05-55930; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (MI), Inc., Case No. 05-55982; Collins & Aikman Carpet & Acoustics (TN), Inc., Case No. 05-55984; Collins & Aikman Development Company, Case No. 05-55943; Collins & Aikman Europe, Inc., Case No. 05-55971; Collins & Aikman Fabrics, Inc. (d/b/a Joan Automotive Industries, Inc.), Case No. 05-55963; Collins & Aikman Intellimold, Inc. (d/b/a M&C Advanced Processes, Inc.), Case No. 05-55976; Collins & Aikman Interiors, Inc., Case No. 05-55970; Collins & Aikman International Corporation, Case No. 05-55951; Collins & Aikman Plastics, Inc., Case No. 05-55960; Collins & Aikman Products Co., Case No. 05-55932; Collins & Aikman Properties, Inc., Case No. 05-55964; Comet Acoustics, Inc., Case No. 05-55972; CW Management Corporation, Case No. 05-55979; Dura Convertible Systems, Inc., Case No. 05-55942; Gamble Development Company, Case No. 05-55974; JPS Automotive, Inc. (d/b/a PACJ, Inc.), Case No. 05-55935; New Baltimore Holdings, LLC, Case No. 05-55992; Owosso Thermal Forming, LLC, Case No. 05-55946; Southwest Laminates, Inc. (d/b/a Southwest Fabric Laminators Inc.), Case No. 05-55948; Wickes Asset Management, Inc., Case No. 05-55962; and Wickes Manufacturing Company, Case No. 05-55968.
K&E 11635254.7
0W[;'"4
0555927070220000000000013
-/
Debtors note these facts because they are characteristic of the way in which the Debtors and their professionals have managed these chapter 11 cases: through a transparent process in which the Debtors confronted all significant strategic, tactical and business issues hand-in-hand with their major constituencies.2 Although the Debtors understand and appreciate why the Court would consider the appointment of a fee examiner in these cases, the Debtors respectfully submit that to appoint a fee examiner at this late stage in these cases would be neither necessary nor fair to estate professionals. In particular, to appoint a fee examiner now may only subject the professionals in these cases to retroactive rules (or retroactive application of a fee examiners guidance), 20/20 hindsight and results-based fee reviews, which directly contradict applicable law and have very little to do with whether fees and expenses were reasonable and necessary at the time incurred. Indeed, the foregoing reasons support why courts generally appoint a fee examiner, if at all, at the beginning of a case. Further, as described below, appointing a fee examiner at the late stage of these cases who must spend significant time, energy and expense getting up to speed (and at the expense of other estate professionals in bringing a fee examiner up to speed) and did not have the benefit of participating at any level in these complex cases will only increase costs and administrative burden to these estates. Accordingly, the Debtors believe that the Court and the primary parties in interest are in the best position to evaluate the professional fees in these cases, and the Debtors therefore respectfully request that a fee examiner not be appointed in these cases. In the event, however, that the Court determines additional oversight of professional fees and expenses is necessary in these cases, the Debtors submit that a fee evaluation committee,
2 In fact, throughout these cases, the Debtors have provided the advisors to all principal parties in interest, including the senior, secured prepetition lenders, the Committee and the Debtors major customers, with extraordinary, daily, on-site access to the Debtors management, personnel, records and professionals.
2
K&E 11635254.7
consisting of (a) the United States trustee, (b) the litigation trust administrator to be appointed pursuant to the Debtors chapter 11 plan and (c) a representative of the Debtors who had direct involvement in major decisions and actions implemented by estate professionals, would be the most appropriate mechanism to achieve this goal. The members of this committee likely would have participated in these cases, be intimately familiar with the myriad of complex issues confronted, possess the substantive knowledge of the actual work performed in these cases and, accordingly, be better suited to assess the reasonableness and necessity of the fees requested and services rendered by the professionals retained in these cases at much lower costs than a fee examiner and without undue delay. Alternatively, the Debtors suggest two fee examiners that they believe would be appropriate for this engagement if the Court believes an examiner is appropriate. Finally, the Debtors respectfully request that the procedures and scope of inquiry for either of these alternatives be carefully considered. Background 1. On May 17, 2005 (the Petition Date), the Debtors filed their voluntary petitions
for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 101-1330 (the Bankruptcy Code). The Debtors are operating their businesses and managing their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee or examiner has been appointed in these cases. On the Petition Date, the Court entered an order jointly administering these cases pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. 2. 3. On May 24, 2005, the United States trustee appointed the Committee. On June 9, 2005, the Court entered the Administrative Order Establishing
Procedures for Monthly Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Professionals and Official Committee Members [Docket No. 290]. 3
K&E 11635254.7
4.
On or about October 13, 2006, estate professionals filed their interim fee
applications for compensation and reimbursement for expenses for services rendered during the period of May 1, 2006 through August 31, 2006 (collectively, the Interim Fee Applications). 5. On or about November 8, 2006, Third Avenue Value Fund (Third Avenue) filed
objections (the Third Avenue Fee Objections) to the Interim Fee Applications, objecting to such professionals fees and expenses and requesting the appointment of a fee examiner. 6. On December 14, 2006, the Court overruled the Third Avenue Fee Objections and
approved the Interim Fee Applications. The Court, however, reserved judgment on the issue of a fee examiner and requested that interested parties file a statement with respect to this issue. 7. On January 24, 2007, the Debtors filed the First Amended Joint Plan of Collins & On
Aikman Corporation and Its Debtor Subsidiaries [Docket No. 3976] (the Plan).
January 26, 2007, the Court entered an order approving the Debtors amended disclosure statement related to the Plan [Docket No. 3988]. Pursuant to this order, the Debtors recently commenced the solicitation process in connection with the Plan. The Plan is supported by the unofficial steering committee for the Debtors senior, secured prepetition lenders, the Committee and the Debtors major customers. April 19, 2007. Statement A. A Fee Examiner Is Neither Necessary Nor In The Best Interests Of The Debtors Estates Or Creditors 8. These cases, which are nearing their conclusion, are high on the list of the most The hearing on confirmation of the Plan is set for
difficult and complex cases in which the Debtors professionals have been involved. Much time has been spent in the last 21 months in a transparent process to attempt to reorganize the Debtors businesses as an ongoing enterprise. The Debtors are proud of these efforts and 4
K&E 11635254.7
confident that every reasonable effort was made to keep the enterprise intact, save jobs and maximize recoveries. Ultimately, however, the businesses could not be reorganized, and the Debtors with their major constituencies determined that selling the Debtors businesses would preserve the most jobs and maximize recoveries. 9. Every step of the way, the Debtors and their major creditor constituencies have
been mindful of the significant fees and expenses of estate professionals, and the Debtors fully support all efforts to reduce those costs. The Debtors believe that certain of these costs have now decreased naturally in the course of the chapter 11 process as these cases near conclusion, although the activity level of the Debtors primary professionals remains necessarily high as the Debtors take every step possible to sell their businesses and confirm their Plan. For example, the Debtors, in cooperation with the SEC, have ceased, for all intents and purposes, incurring costs in connection with responding to the SEC and DOJ investigations, and the fees and expenses of the Committees professionals also have markedly declined appropriately. 10. Although the Debtors understand why the Court is considering the appointment of
a fee examiner, the Debtors respectfully submit that this action is unnecessary, unfair and would only result in increased fees, expenses and administrative burden rather than reduced costs. First, as set forth above, given the transparent management of these cases, the sophisticated parties involved and the fee trend in these cases, a fee examiner is unnecessary. Second, the parties in these cases, the Office of the United States Trustee and this Court are more than able to review fees and expenses consistent with the statutory scheme implemented by Congress. Third, appointing a fee examiner at this late stage encourages results-based fee review and may include 20/20 hindsight, which is inconsistent with applicable law. Fourth, appointing a fee examiner would only result in (a) a further drain on the Debtors estates with respect to time and
5
K&E 11635254.7
money, (b) potential collateral litigation regarding fee matters and (c) an additional layer of administrative claims. 11. Moreover, as this Court is well aware, these cases have been exceedingly
complex, time-consuming and difficult. Given the size and complexity of these cases and the fact that these cases are approaching their conclusion, it would be extremely difficult for a fee examiner who has not been involved in these cases at all in the 21 months since their inception to become educated to the extent necessary to accomplish its tasks in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Indeed, it would require considerable time, money and effort on the part of all parties to educate anyone unfamiliar with these cases in the various aspects of these large, complex cases. 12. The Debtors also note that it would be very unusual to appoint a fee examiner
near the conclusion of a case rather than near the beginning of a case so that (a) the fee examiner may analyze the necessity of a professionals services at the time such services are rendered and with the full knowledge of such services that were performed and (b) the professionals know the parameters of any guidelines a fee examiner may implement and act accordingly. well-settled that professional fees are not to be judged in hindsight. It is
See 11 U.S.C.
330(a)(3)(C) (analysis is made at the time at which the service is rendered); see also In re Gadzooks, Inc., 352 B.R. 796, 811 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2006) (holding that professional fees should be judged at the time services were rendered). 13. Accordingly, the Debtors respectfully submit that a fee examiner should not be
6
K&E 11635254.7
B.
Alternatives: (1) A Fee Evaluation Committee; or (2) Fee Examiner Recommendations 14. If this Court determines that additional fee assessment is appropriate, as an
alternative to a fee examiner, the Debtors would propose that the Court form a fee evaluation committee (the Fee Evaluation Committee) consisting of: (a) the United States trustee; (b) the litigation trust administrator to be appointed pursuant to the Plan; and (c) a representative of the Debtors that was involved in major decisions implemented by the Debtors professionals at the direction of their clients. In particular, the Fee Evaluation Committee would (a) review the final fee applications submitted by the professionals in these cases and (b) ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the applicable guidelines established by this Court and the Office of the United States Trustee. 3 15. Further, the proposed members of the Fee Evaluation Committee would be
intimately familiar with the myriad of complex issues involved in these cases and, therefore, better suited to assess the reasonableness and necessity of the fees requested and services rendered by the professionals retained in these cases. Indeed, fee recommendations made by the Fee Evaluation Committee with direct, substantive knowledge of the actual work performed would be far more likely to be accepted by the Court and the professionals whose fees are being reviewed than recommendations made by an outside auditor with no direct involvement in these cases and no substantive, real-time knowledge of the professionals work. In addition, the Fee Evaluation Committee could review professional fee applications more efficiently than an outside auditor, at much lower costs and without undue delay, because its members would be familiar with the professional work that was performed on behalf of the Debtors and the
The Debtors have conferred with the Office of the United States Trustee regarding the proposed Fee Evaluation Committee and its proposed members. The Office of the United States Trustee is still evaluating the Debtors proposal.
7
K&E 11635254.7
Committee. Equally as important, these members adequately represent the constituents in these cases who stand to benefit from the review of professional fees. 16. The Fee Evaluation Committee approach also is the more common approach
taken by courts in large, complex chapter 11 cases, such as these cases, when a Court believes an additional layer of fee oversight is necessary. For example, fee review committees have been established in the following large chapter 11 cases: In re Delta Air Lines, Inc., No. 05-17923ASH (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2006) (providing for a committee comprised of representatives of the debtors, official creditors committee, and United States trustee to review professional fee requests); In re Delphi Corp., 05-44481-RDD (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 5, 2006) (same); In re US Airways, Inc., No. 04-13819-SSM (Bankr. E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2004) (same); In re Worldcom, Inc., No. 02-13533-AJG (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2003) (same); In re UAL Corp., No. 02B48191-ERW (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Jan. 15, 2003) (same); In re US Airways Group, Inc., No. 0283984-SSM (Bankr. E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2002) (same); In re Global Cross Ltd., No. 02-40188REG (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 21, 2002) (same); In re Enron Corp., No. 01-16034-AJG (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2002) (same); In re Kmart Corp., No. 02-B02474-SPS (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Mar. 21, 2002) (same); and In re The Singer Co., N.V., No. 99-10578-BRL (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 1999) (same).4 17. The Debtors also propose that the review performed by the Fee Evaluation
Committee, or any other fee review committee established by the Court, be limited in scope
A copy of the order entered in each of these cases is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In addition, for the Courts convenience, the Debtors will attempt to obtain a copy of the applicable hearing transcripts for each of these cases prior to a hearing on this matter. Furthermore, the Debtors will be prepared to discuss how fee review committees have been implemented in other cases at a hearing on this matter.
8
K&E 11635254.7
solely to the review of final fee applications and limited to matters that are particular areas of concern.5 18. As an alternative to a committee, the Debtors also support, if the Court prefers,
the appointment of a fee examiner and recommend the following parties for this engagement:6 (a) Warren Smith Warren Smith & Associates Republic Center 325 N. St. Paul, Suite 1275 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 698-3868 whsmith@whsmithlaw.com Wallace M. Handler Sullivan, Ward, Bone, Tyler & Asher, P.C. 25800 Northwestern Highway 1000 Maccabees Center Southfield, Michigan 48037-0222 Telephone: (248) 746-2780 whandler@swappc.com
(b)
19.
In any event, the Debtors would request that if the Court were to appoint a fee
examiner in these cases that the fee examiners review of professional fees be limited in scope solely to the review of final fee applications and limited to matters that are particular areas of concern.7
5 6 7
The Debtors also will be prepared to discuss at a hearing on this matter suggested procedures for a fee review committee in these cases if the Court would find it helpful. The curriculum vitae for each of the Debtors recommendations is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Debtors also have attached orders entered by other courts appointing fee examiners as Exhibit C. The Debtors also will be prepared to discuss at a hearing on this matter suggested procedures for a fee examiner if the Court would find it helpful.
9
K&E 11635254.7
WHEREFORE, the Debtors respectfully request that this Court (a) deny the appointment of a fee examiner in these cases and (b) grant such other and further relief as is just and proper. Dated: February 20, 2007 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP /s/ Ray C. Schrock Richard M. Cieri (NY RC 6062) Citigroup Center 153 East 53rd Street New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 -andDavid L. Eaton (IL 3122303) Ray C. Schrock (IL 6257005) Marc J. Carmel (IL 6272032) 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (312) 861-2000 Facsimile: (312) 861-2200 -andCARSON FISCHER, P.L.C. Joseph M. Fischer (P13452) 4111 West Andover Road West - Second Floor Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 Telephone: (248) 644-4840 Facsimile: (248) 644-1832 Co-Counsel for the Debtors
K&E 11635254.7
EXHIBIT A
K&E 11635254.7
EXHIBIT B
K&E 11635254.7
EXHIBIT C
K&E 11635254.7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ray C. Schrock, an attorney, certify that on the 20th day of February, 2007, I caused to be served, by e-mail, facsimile and overnight delivery, in the manner and to the parties set forth on the attached service lists, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Debtors Statement Regarding Appointment of Fee Examiner. Dated: February 20, 2007 /s/ Ray C. Schrock Ray C. Schrock
K&E 11635254.7
CREDITOR NAME A Freeman Acord Inc Adrian City Hall Alice B Eaton Amalgamated Life Askounis & Borst PC Assistant Attorney General of Texas ATC Nymold Corporation Athens City Tax Collector Attorney for MDEQ Attorneys for Michigan DLEG UIA Autoliv ASP Inc Bailey & Cavalieri LLC Baker & Hostetler LLP Balch & Bingham LLP Barnes & Thornburg LLP Barnes & Thornburg LLP Bartlett Hackett Feinberg Basell USA Inc
CREDITOR NOTICE NAME John Livingston John Fabor Judith Greenspan Esq Thomas V Askounis Esq E Stuart Phillips Sherry Epstein Mike Keith Celeste Gill Asst Attorney General Roland Hwang Asst Attorney General Eric R Swanson Esq & Anthony J Nellis Esq Adam J Biehl & Yvette A Cox Wendy J Gibson & Brian A Bash Eric T Ray John T Gregg Patrick E Mears Frank F McGinn Scott Salerni
Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP William E Schonberg & Stuart A Laven Jr Bernardi Ronayne & Glusac PC Rodney M. Glusac Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP Berry Moorman PC Berry Moorman PC Bird Svendsen Brothers Scheske & Pattison PC Borges & Associates LLC Bose McKinney & Evans LLP Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP Brendan G Best Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLP Bryan Clay Burr & Forman LLP Butzel Long PC Butzel Long PC Cahill Gordon & Reindel Cahill Gordon & Reindel Calhoun Di Ponio & Gaggos PLC Carlile Patchen & Murphy LLP Chambliss Bahner & Stophel PC Champaign County Collector Chris Kocinski City Of Eunice City Of Evart City Of Kitchener Finance Dept City Of Lowell City Of Marshall City Of Muskegon City Of Port Huron City Of Rialto City Of Rochester Hills City Of Salisbury City Of Westland City Of Woonsocket Ri City Treasurer City Treasurer Colbert & Winstead PC Steven Singer & John Browne Dante Benedettini Esq James Murphy Esq Eric J Scheske Wanda Borges Esq Jeannette Eisan Hinshaw Jay R Bender
EMAIL afreeman@akingump.com jlivingston@acordinc.com cityofadrian@iw.net aeaton@stblaw.com jgreenspan@amalgamatedlife.com taskounis@askborst.com stuart.phillips@oag.state.tx.us sepstein@atc-lighting-plastics.com finance@cityofathens.com gillcr@michigan.gov hwangr@michigan.gov eric.swanson@autoliv.com tony.nellis@autoliv.com Yvette.Cox@baileycavalieri.com Adam.Biehl@baileycavalieri.com wgibson@bakerlaw.com eray@balch.com john.gregg@btlaw.com pmears@btlaw.com ffm@bostonbusinesslaw.com scott.salerni@basell.com wschonberg@bfca.com slaven@bfca.com rodg@brgpc.com steve@blbglaw.com johnb@blbglaw.com dante@berrymoorman.com murph@berrymoorman.com bsbs@charter.net borgeslawfirm@aol.com jhinshaw@boselaw.com jbender@bradleyarant.com bbest@dykema.com rstark@brownrudnick.com ssmith@brownrudnick.com bryan_clay@ham.honda.com shoff@burr.com sharkey@butzel.com osborne@butzel.com wilkins@butzel.com jschaffzin@cahill.com rusadi@cahill.com kcc@cdg-law.com lxf@cpmlaw.com bbailey@cbslawfirm.com bneal@co.champaign.il.us christopher.j.kocinski@bofasecurities.com Eunicela@hotmail.com evartmanager@sbcglobal.net finance@city.kitchener.on.ca MYoung@ci.lowell.ma.us Mevans@cityofmarshall.com roberto.robles@postman.org cphdp@porthuron.org treasurer@rialtoca.gov treasury@rochesterhills.org finwebreq@salisburync.gov finance@ci.westland.mi.us webmaster@woonsocketri.org THovarter@cityofmarshall.com Ncowdrey@corunna-mi.gov amalone@colwinlaw.com
Robert Stark & Steven Smith Shannon E Hoff Daniel N Sharkey & Paula A Osborne Matthew E Wilkins Esq Jonathan A Schaffzin Robert Usadi Kevin C Calhoun Leon Friedberg Bruce C Bailey Barb Neal The Mator at City Hall Roger Elkins City Manager Pauline Houston Lowell Regional Wastewater Maurice S Evans City Manager Bob Robles Treasurer's Office City Treasurer Kurt A Dawson City Assesor Treasurer Business License Div Pretreatment Division Tracy Horvarter Amy Wood Malone
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 1 of 5
CREDITOR NAME Cole Schotz Meisel Forman & Leonard PA Constellation NewEnergy Inc Coolidge Wall Womsley & Lombard Crowell & Moring LLP Crowell & Moring LLP Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho PLC DaimlerChrysler DaimlerChrysler DaimlerChrysler Corporation Daniella Saltz Danielle Kemp Danning Gill Diamond & Kollitz LLP David H Freedman David Heller David Youngman Dennis C Roberts PLLC Dickinson Wright PLLC Dickinson Wright PLLC Dilworth Paxson LLP Dow Chemical Company Dow Chemical Company Duane Morris LLP DuPont Dworken & Bernstein Co LPA Dykema Gossett Rooks Pitts PLLC Earle I Erman Eastman & Smith Ltd Elias Meginnes Riffle & Seghetti PC Ellwood Group Inc Erin M Casey Erman Teicher Miller Zucker & Freedman PC Foley & Lardner LLP Frank Gorman Gail Perry Garan Lucow Miller PC Garan Lucow Miller PC Ge Capital GE Polymerland George E Schulman Gold Lange & Majoros PC Gold Lange & Majoros PC Hal Novikoff Handwork & Kerscher LLP Heather Sullivan Hewlett Packard Co Hewlett Packard Co Hunton & Williams LLP Hyman Lippitt PC InterChez Logistics Systems Inc International Union UAW Jacob & Weingarten PC Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss PC Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss PC James A Plemmons James C Edwards Jenner & Block LLP Jim Clough Joe LaFleur Joe Saad John A Harris
CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Stuart Komrower & Mark Politan Catherine Barron Esq Steven M Wachstein Esq Joseph L Meadows Mark D Plevin K Kinsey
George E Shulman
Dennis C Roberts Dawn R Copley Esq Michael C Hammer Anne Marie Kelley & Scott Freedman Kathleen Maxwell Lee H Sjoberg Brian W Bisignani Esq Bruce Tobiansky Howard S Rabb Esq Peter J Schmidt Matthew D Harper Brian J Meginnes & Janaki Nair Susan A Apel Esq
EMAIL skomrower@coleschotz.com mpolitan@coleschotz.com cathy.barron@constellation.com wachstein@coollaw.com jmeadows@crowell.com mplevin@crowell.com kkinsey@cmda-law.com kpm3@daimlerchrysler.com krk4@daimlerchrysler.com krk4@dcx.com dsaltz@ford.com danielle.kemp@lw.com ges@dgdk.com dfreedman@ermanteicher.com david.heller@lw.com David.Youngman@ColAik.com dcroberts@coxinet.net dcopley@dickinsonwright.com mchammer2@dickinsonwright.com sfreedman@dilworthlaw.com klmaxwell@dow.com LHSjoberg@dow.com bisignani@duanemorris.com bruce.d.tobiansky@usa.dupont.com abollas@dworkenlaw.com pschmidt@dykema.com eerman@ermanteicher.com mdharper@eastmansmith.com bmeginnes@emrslaw.com jnair@emrslaw.com sapel@elwd.com ecasey@stblaw.com jteicher@ermanteicher.com jo'neill@foley.com fgorman@honigman.com perry.gail@pbgc.com kblair@garanlucow.com rvozza@garanlucow.com rail.sales@ge.com valerie.venable@ge.com ges@dgdk.com emajoros@glmpc.com sgold@glmpc.com dlehl@glmpc.com HSNovikoff@wlrk.com kerscher@aol.com hsullivan@unumprovident.com anne.kennelly@hp.com ken.higman@hp.com jburns@hunton.com bokeefe@hymanlippitt.com mchesnes@interchez.com nganatra@uaw.net rob@jacobweingarten.com aschehr@jaffelaw.com lrochkind@jaffelaw.com jplemmons@dickinson-wright.com jamesedwardslaw@peoplepc.com ppossinger@jenner.com jrc8@daimlerchrysler.com joe_lafleur@ham.honda.com js284477@bloomberg.net jharris@quarles.com
Kellie M Blair Esq Robert Vozza Esq Val Venable Elias T Majoros Stuart A Gold & Donna J Lehl Jeffrey M Kerscher Anne Marie Kennelly Ken Higman John D Burns Brian D Okeefe Mark Chesnes Niraj R Ganatra Robert K Siegel Alicia S Schehr Louis P Rochkind
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 2 of 5
CREDITOR NAME John Green John J Dawson John S Sawyer Josef Athanas Joseph Delehant Esq Joseph M Fischer Esq K Crumbo K Schultz Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
EMAIL greenj@millercanfield.com jdawson@quarles.com jss@sawyerglancy.com josef.athanas@lw.com joseph.delehant@sylvania.com jfischer@carsonfischer.com kcrumbo@kraftscpas.com kschultz@tmmna.com jcarr@kelleydrye.com robert.bassel@kkue.com kll2@krwlaw.com kim.stagg@nmm.nissan-usa.com Kimberly.Rodriguez@gt.com tah@kompc.com patrick.healy@lawdeb.com daniel.fisher@lawdeb.com stzouvelekas@lwtm.com lwalzer@angelogordon.com veronica.fennie@lfr.com dallas.bankruptcy@publicans.com houston_bankruptcy@publicans.com tim@litespeedpartners.com metkin@lowenstein.com ilevee@lowenstein.com vdagostino@lowenstein.com mcrosby@akingump.com webmaster@misd.net mcarmel@kirkland.com mark.w.fischer@gm.com dhoopes@mayocrowe.com lrosenbloom@mwe.com dchristian@mwe.com jdejonker@mwe.com JRG@msblaw.com palucey@michaelbest.com mpaslay@wallerlaw.com mstamer@akingump.com treasReg@michigan.gov dmgbeachlaw@hawaii.rr.com Michael.Orourke@colaik.com mike.paslay@wallerlaw.com pborenstein@milesstockbridge.com fusco@millercanfield.com brucemiller@millercohen.com sarbt@millerjohnson.com tdunn@mindengross.com info@electionsquebec.qc.ca mied@dor.mo.gov jmorganroth@morganrothlaw.com maire@st-zotique.com rrios@munsch.com jbruinsma@mnds-pllc.com kschneider@niccausa.com Nick.Shah@cit.com nina.m.rosete@bofasecurities.com pbaylor@nutter.com rcolasuonno@orlaw.com ssoll@oshr.com phoffman@bofasecurities.com
Kemp Klein Umphrey Endelman & May PC Robert N Bassel Esq Kerr Russell & Weber PLC Kevin L Larin & James E DeLine Kim Stagg Kimberly Davis Rodriguez Paul Magy Terrance Hiller Jr & Matthew Kupelian Ormond & Magy PC Thompson Law Debenture Trust Company of New York Patrick Healy & Daniel Fisher Leatherwood Walker Todd & Mann PC Seann Gray Tzouvelekas Leigh Walzer Levine Fricke Inc Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP Litespeed Partners Lowenstein Sandler PC Lowenstein Sandler PC M Crosby Macomb Intermediate School Marc J Carmel Mark Fischer Mayo Crowe LLC Elizabeth Weller John P Dillman Timothy Chen Michael S Etkin & Ira M Levee Vincent A DAgostino Esq
David S Hoopes
McDermott Will & Emery LLP McShane & Bowie PLC Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Michael R Paslay Michael Stamer Michigan Department Of Treasury Mighty Enterprises Inc Mike O'Rourke Mike Paslay Miles & Stockbridge PC Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone PLC Miller Cohen Miller Johnson Minden Gross LLP Ministry Of Finance Corp Tax Branch Missouri Dept Of Revenue Morganroth & Morganroth PLLC Municipalite Du Village De Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC Myers Nelson Dillon & Shierk PLLC NICCA USA Inc Nick Shah Nina Rosete Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP O Reilly Rancilio PC
David M Gurewitz
Patricia A Borenstein Esq Timothy A Fusco Esq Bruce A Miller Thomas P Sarb & Robert D Wolford Timothy Dunn 15663507 Jeffrey Morganroth Lacolle Randall A Rios James R Bruinsma Karen Schneider
Otterbourg Steindler Houston & Rosen PC Steven B Soll Esq Paul Hoffman
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 3 of 5
CREDITOR NAME Pear Sperling Eggan & Daniels PC Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Pepe & Hazard LLP Pepper Hamilton LLP Pepper Hamilton LLP Pepper Hamilton LLP Peter Schmidt Peter V Pantaleo Phh Canada Inc Philip Dublin Phoenix Contracting Company Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Pitts Hay & Hugenschmidt PA Plunkett & Cooney PC Quadrangle Group LLC Quadrangle Group LLC R Aurand R J Sidman Ralph E McDowell Ravich Meyer Kirkman McGrath & Nauman PA Ray C Schrock Rex D Rainach Rhoades McKee Rick Feinstein Ricoh Canada Inc Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP RLI Insurance Company Robert J Diehl Jr Robert Weiss Ronald A Leggett Ronald R Rose Sarah Eagle SC DHEC Sean P Corcoran Seiller Waterman LLC Seyburn Kahn Ginn Bess & Serlin PC Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green PA Sheryl Toby Shumaker Loop & Kendrick LLP Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP Sills Cummis Epstein & Gross PC Spengler Nathanson PLL St Paul Travelers Stark County Treasurer State Of Michigan
CREDITOR NOTICE NAME Kevin N Summers Sara Eagle & Gail Perry Sara Eagle & Gail Perry Charles J Filardi Jr Francis J Lawall & Bonnie MacDougal Kistler J Gregg Miller & Linda J Casey Kenneth H Zucker
Tricia Sommers Craig A Barbarosh Patrick J Potter Esq Rick Antonoff Esq Lara Sheikh Esq Josh J May Esq William B Freeman Esq Robert P Pitts Esq Douglas C Bernstein Andrew Herenstein Patrick Bartels
EMAIL ksummers@psedlaw.com eagle.sara@pbgc.gov efile@pbgc.gov cfilardi@pepehazard.com lawallf@pepperlaw.com kistlerb@pepperlaw.com millerj@pepperlaw.com zuckerk@pepperlaw.com pschmidt@dykema.com ppantaleo@stblaw.com phhmail@phhpc.com pdublin@akingump.com triciawinkle@hotmail.com craig.barbarosh@pillsburylaw.com patrick.potter@pillsburylaw.com rick.antonoff@pillsburylaw.com bill.freeman@pillsburylaw.com pittsrm@charter.net dbernstein@plunkettcooney.com andrew.herenstein@quadranglegroup.com patrick.bartels@quadranglegroup.com raurand@e-bbk.com rjsidman@vssp.com rmcdowell@bodmanllp.com
State Of Michigan State Of Michigan Stephen E Spence Stephen S LaPlante Steven A Siman PC
mfmcgrath@ravichmeyer.com rschrock@kirkland.com A Professional Law Corporation rainach@msn.com Dan E Bylenga Jr dbylenga@rhoadesmckee.com rick.feinstein@ubs.com legal@ricoh.ca Dennis J OGrady Joseph L Schwartz & Curtis M jschwartz@riker.com Plaza cplaza@riker.com Roy Die Roy_Die@rlicorp.com rdiehl@bodmanllp.com rweiss@honigman.com Collector Of Revenue leggettr@stlouiscity.com rrose@dykema.com eagle.sarah@pbgc.com whitehme@dhec.sc.gov Evander Whitehead chandlls@dhec.sc.gov sean.p.corcoran@delphi.com Richard M Rubenstein rubenstein@derbycitylaw.com Leslie Stein lstein@seyburn.com Bruce Harwood bharwood@sheehan.com stoby@dykema.com David H Conaway dconaway@slk-law.com bguzina@sidley.com Bojan Guzina & Brian J Lohan blohan@sidley.com asherman@sillscummis.com Andrew H Sherman & Boris I Mankovetskiy bmankovetskiy@sillscummis.com Michael W Bragg Esq MBragg@SpenglerNathanson.com Vatana Rose vrosa@stp.com PA Powers PAPowers@co.stark.oh.us Michigan Dept Of Environmental Quality Environmental Assistance Div deq-ead-env-assist@michigan.gov Michigan Dept Of Treasury Collection Div Office of Financial Mgmt Cashiers Office treasReg@michigan.gov Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency shuttkimberlyj@michigan.gov US Trustee steve.e.spence@usdoj.gov laplante@millercanfield.com Steven A Siman sas@simanlaw.net
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 4 of 5
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young LLP T Pryce Tax Administrator Textron Inc The Bank of New York Thomas Radom Treasurer Of State Tricia Sherick Tyco Capital Inc United Rentals Of Canada Inc United Steelworkers Varnum Riddering Schmidt & Howlett LLP Ville De Farnham Vinson & Elkins LLP Von Briesen & Roper SC Voridian Canada Company Warner Norcross & Judd LLP Warner Stevens LLP Wickes Manufacturing Co William C Andrews William G Diehl William J Byrne Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP WL Ross & Co Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP
CREDITOR NOTICE NAME EMAIL Leonard P Goldberger Esq & John C Kilgannon Esq jck@stevenslee.com ppatterson@stradley.com mdorval@stradley.com jtrotter@stradley.com Paul Patterson Esq tpryce@ford.com Jim Cambio jcambio@tax.ri.gov afriedman@textron.com Gary S Bush gbush@bankofny.com radom@butzel.com Joseph T. Deters treasurer@tos.state.oh.us tsherick@honigman.com Frank.Chaffiotte@cit.com e-rental@ur.com David R Jury djury@usw.org Mary Kay Shaver Service de la Tresorerie John E West Randall Crocker & Rebecca Simoni Michael G Cruse Michael D Warner Esq co Stacy Fox of C&A mkshaver@varnumlaw.com msaintdenis@ville.farnham.qc.ca jwest@velaw.com rcrocker@vonbriesen.com blanderson@eastman.com mcruse@wnj.com mwarner@warnerstevens.com stacy.fox@colaik.com kandrews@e-bbk.com wdiehl@e-bbk.com bbyrne@e-bbk.com alipkin@willkie.com rspigel@willkie.com andrew.goldman@wilmerhale.com pmachir@wlross.com RWhelehan@wcsr.com pjanovsky@zeklaw.com
Alan Lipkin & Roger Spigel Andrew N Goldman Esq Patrick Machir Rory D Whelehan Esq Peter Janovsky & Stuart Krause
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 5 of 5
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 1 of 1
ADDRESS2
COUNTRY
Mike Keith Charlie Burrill Harry W Miller III Jay Truty Ms Amy Evans Thomas B Radom Attn Receiver General International Tax Service
Canada Canada
CREDITOR NAME Advanced Composites Inc Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP Assoc Receivables Funding Inc Athens City Tax Collector Basf Corporation Beam Miller & Rogers PLLC Bell Boyd & Lloyd Inc Brunswick Corp Butzel Long PC Canada Customs & Rev Agency Canada Customs & Rev Agency Charter Township Of Plymouth City Of Barberton City Of Canton City Of Dover City Of Dover City Of Evart Recreation Dept City Of Fullerton City Of Havre De Grace
ADDRESS1 1062 S 4th Ave 590 Madison Ave PO Box 16253 PO Box 849 1609 Biddle Ave 709 Taylor St 3 1st National Plaza Ste 3300 Law Dept 100 Bloomfield Hills Pkwy Ste 100 1 5 Notre Ave 2204 Walkley Rd PO Box 8040 104 3rd St NW PO Box 9951 484 Middle Rd PO Box 818 200 South Main St 303 W Commonwealth Ave 711 Pennington Ave
CITY Sidney New York Greenville Athens Wyandotte PO Box 280240 Nashville 70 W Madison St Chicago One North Field Ct Lake Forest Bloomfield Hills Sudbury Ottawa Plymouth Barberton Canton Dover Dover Evart Fullerton Havre De Grace
STATE OH NY SC TN MI TN IL IL MI ON ON MI OH OH NH NH MI CA MD
ZIP 45365-8977 10022 29606 37371-0849 48192 37208 60602-4207 60045 48304 P3A 5C2 K1A 1B1 48170-4394 44203 44711-9951 03820 03820-0818 49631 92632 21078
City of Kalamazoo City Of Los Angeles City Of Phoenix City Of Roxboro City Of St Joseph City Of Williamston City Treasurer Collector Of Revenue Collins & Aikman Corp Legal Dept Columbia Center 10th Fl 321 Settlers Rd 4500 Dorr St 885 Third Ave Ste 3300 7000 N Green Bay Ave Kellie Schone Jayson Macyda DuPont Legal D 7156 400 Renaissance Center One SeaGate 24th Fl 4611 North 32nd St 1084 Doris Rd 47690 E Anchor Ct PO Box 105499 PO Box 890691
Carolyn Rutland PhD Dept Of Building And Safety City Attorneys Office Tax Department Water Department
Public Svc Dept Env Svc Div 201 N Figueroa St No 786 200 W Washington St 13th Fl PO Box 128 700 BRd St 161 E Grand River 100 Mcmorran 201 N Second St 26553 Evergreen Rd
MI CA AZ NC MI MI MI MO MI NY MI MI OH New York Milwaukee 5445 Corporate Dr Ste 170 Troy 1007 N Market St Wilmington Detroit PO Box 10032 Toledo Milwaukee Auburn Hills Plymouth Atlanta Charlotte NY WI MI DE MI OH WI MI MI GA NC
49007-2565 90012 85003 27573 49085-1355 48895 48060 63301 48076 14831 48084 49423 43615 10022 53209 48098-2683 19898 48243 43604 53209-6023 48326-2613 48170 30348-5499 28289-0691
Corning Inc
Cox Hodgman & Giarmarco PC Cunningham Dalman PC Dana Corp Davidson Kempner Capital Management LLC Dennis Reis LLC
William H Horton Esq & Sean M Walsh Esq Jeffrey K Helder Lisa A Wurster Esq
1415 N Harrison St Kalamazoo File 54563 Los Angeles Phoenix Roxboro St Joseph Williamston Port Huron St Charles Ste 900 Southfield Riverfront Plaza HQ E2 10 Corning 101 W Big Beaver Rd Troy PO Box 1767 Holland PO Box 1000 Toledo
Charles McKelvie Rita Baird Susan F Herr Ronald Rose & Brendan Best David W Nunn Esq Gary Torke
Dold Spath McKelvie & DeLuca PC DuPont Dykema Gossett PLLC Eastman & Smith Ltd ER Wagner Manufacturing Fisher Automotive Systems Fisher America Inc Freudenberg Nok Inc
William Stiefel
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 1 of 4
ADDRESS2
COUNTRY
CREDITOR NAME Ge Capital Ge Capital Ge Capital Ge Capital Comm Serv Astro Dye General Motors Corp Harford County Revenue Heritage Environmental Svcs Inc Hicks Casey & Foster PC PO Box 300 Attn Lease Administration TN 37203
Linda L Bentley
ADDRESS1 PO Box 740434 PO Box 640387 PO Box 642444 PO Box 60500 300 Renaissance Center 220 South Main St 7901 W Morris St 136 N Fairground St Ste 100
CITY Atlanta Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Charlotte Detroit Bel Air Indianapolis Marietta
STATE GA PA PA NC MI MD IN GA
Highwoods Forsyth Lp
Canada
Highwoods Forsyth Lp Hnk Michigan Properties Indiana Department Of Revenue Indiana Dept Of Revenue Indiana Steel & Wire Co Industrial Development Board Industrial Leasing Company Industrial Truck Sales & Svc Inmet Division of Multimatic Internal Revenue Service Invista ISP Elastomer
Tim Gorman
Attn Lease Administration 7255 Crossleigh Court Ste 108 100 N Senate Ave PO Box 7218 1 E 4th St PO Box 4660 PO Box 1803 PO Box 1807 35 West Milmot St Box 330500 Stop 15 601 S LA Salle St Ste 310 PO Box 4346
NC OH IN IN OH AL MI NC ON MI IL TX
27604 43617 46204-2253 46207-7218 45202 36103-4660 49501 27702-1807 L4B 1L7 48232 60605-1725 77210
Howard S Sher
Laura Kelly
MI MI MI AL
C Garland Waller
3322 West End Ave Ste 600 Nashville 3100 Smoketree Ct Ste 600 Raleigh Toledo Indianapolis Indianapolis Cincinnati Montgomery Grand Rapids Durham Richmond Hill Detroit Chicago Houston 2301 W Big Beaver Rd Troy Grand Ledge Grand Rapids Phenix 21557 Telegraph Rd Southfield Southfield Farmington Hills Greenville
MI MI MI NC
Michael A Cox Juandisha M Harris & Heather Donald Stephen M Sylvestri Esq
Michigan Dept of Treasury Mills & Stockbridge PC Ministre Du Revenu Du Quebec Municipality Of Port Hope North Loop Partners Ltd Nossiff & Giampa PC Oakland County Corporation Counsel
Canada Canada
3030 W Grand Blvd Ste 10 200 10 Light St 3800 Marly PO Box 117 PO Box 3449 24 Chestnut St 1200 N Telegraph Rd 320 Robert S Kerr Rm 307
MI MD QC ON TX NH MI
Oklahoma County Treasurer Oneida County SCU PolyOne Corp Prestige Property Tax Special Princeton Properties
Asst District Attorney 800 Park Ave 4th Fl 33587 Walker Rd 1025 King St East 678 Princeton Blvd Legal Dept Church St Station
Oklahoma City Utica Avon Lake Cambridge Lowell 10,000 Midatlantic Dr PO Box 6529 Mt Laurel New York
OK NY OH ON MA NJ NY
Canada
Jason Pickering
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 2 of 4
CREDITOR NAME Qrs 14 Paying Agent Inc Railroad Drive Lp Receivable Management Services PO Box 5126
ADDRESS2
COUNTRY
Phyllis A Hayes
ADDRESS1 50 Rockefeller Lobby 2 100 Vesper Executive Pk 9690 Deereco Rd Ste 200
STATE NY MA MD
Receiver General For Canada Receiver General For Canada Receiver General for Canada Receiver General For Canada Revenue Canada Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission 875 Heron Rd
Canada Customs & Rev Agency Technology Ctr 875 Heron Rd Industry Canada Als Financial Postal Station D Box 2330 700 Leigh Capreol 11 Station St Ottawa Technology Centre Angela Dodd 175 W Jackson Blvd Ste 900 Midwest Regional Office 175 W Jackson Blvd Ste 900
ON ON QC ON ON IL IL
K1A 1B1 K1P 6K1 H4Y 1G7 K8N 2S3 K1A 9Z9 60604 60604
Shapero & Green LLC Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP State Of Alabama State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State Of Michigan State of Michigan PO Box 30744
Dept Of Commerce & Nat Res Matthew Rick Asst Attorney General State Of Michigan Mc State Secondary Complex
Signature Square II Ste 220 425 Lexington Ave Department Of Revenue PO Box 30004 PO Box 30754 Dept 77833 7150 Harris Dr PO Box 30015 430 W Allegan St
25101 Chagrin Blvd Cleveland New York 50 N Ripley St Montgomery Lansing Lansing Detroit Lansing Lansing
OH NY AL MI MI MI MI MI
PO Box 2228
Canada PO Box 67
PO Box 100
Canada
Fsia Inc
Randy Lueth
Office of Child Support 211 W Fort St Ste 700 24901 Northwestern Hwy 302 1985 Blvd Se PO Box 1192 21 Albert St 155 S Limerick Rd Cordell Hall 130 Oxford St 2nd Fl 1144 E Market St 126 North Pearl St 8155 TB Blvd 1306 E Triumph Dr 356 Main St 3802 S Main 30 King St East PO Box 520 PO Box 67 315 North Main St 200 E Big Beaver PO Box 33525 7201 W Friendly Ave 942 Brooks Ave 211 W Fort St Ste 2001 3000 University Dr 12341 E 9 Mile Rd 10 Livingston Pl 2nd Fl 205 Millersburg Rd
Lansing Detroit Southfield Hickory Fresno Trenton Limerick Nashville Ingersoll Akron Pageland Memphis Urbana Farmington Farmville Gananoque Old Fort Pageland Troy Troy Detroit Greensboro Holland
MI MI MI NC CA ON PA TN ON OH SC TN IL NH NC ON NC SC NC MI MI NC MI
48909-8244 48226 48075 28602 937151192 K8V 5R1 19468 37247 N5C 2V5 44316-0001 29728 38125 61802 03835 27828-1621 K7G 2T6 28762 29728 27371 48083 48232 27410-6237 49423
State of Michigan Central Functions Unit Stephen E Spence Summit Property Management Inc Tate Boulevard I Llc Tax Collector Tcs Realty Ltd Teleflex Inc Tennessee Department of Revenue The Corporation Of The Town The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co The Town Of Pageland Thomas & Betts Corp Tom Heck Truck Service Town Of Farmington Town Of Farmville Town Of Gananoque Town Of Old Fort Town Of Pageland Town Of Troy Tr Associates Treasurer City Of Detroit Unifi Inc Uniform Color Co United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Valeo Inc Vari Form Inc Vespera Lowell Llc Village Of Holmesville
Attn Civil Division Jerry Dittrich Terry Nardone Blue Point Capital Bpv Lowell LLC
PO Box 113
MI MI MI CT OH
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 3 of 4
ADDRESS2
STATE IL
ZIP 61866
COUNTRY
W9 Lws Real Estate Limited Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz Wellington Green LLC Young & Susser PC
10101 Claude Freeman Dr Ste 200 N 51 W 52nd St 31100 Telegraph Rd Ste 200 26200 American Dr Ste 305
NC NY MI MI
In re: Collins & Aikman Corp., et al. Case No. 05-55927 (SWR)
Page 4 of 4