Introduction Life satisfaction is defined by contentment with or acceptance of ones life circumstances or the fulfillment of ones wants and

needs for ones life as a whole. In essence, life satisfaction is a subjective assessment of the quality of ones life (Sousa, L., &Lyubomirsky, S., 2001). This is measured through the various dimensions that comprise life in general: work, family, social activity, religion, wealth and various other factors. These components have individual weights that are subjectively placed upon them by each person. Life satisfaction levels differ from person to person, depending on the state of their life factors. The higher these factors are, the higher is the level of life satisfaction (Sekiguchi& Kato, 2003). Job, family and social satisfaction, are generally considered to be the most significant effect on life satisfaction individually, concluding that it is multi-factorial and overtly subjective. In order to assess the general overall life satisfaction, it is needed to evaluate the important domains that comprise it. Evaluation of life satisfaction is important to every community. Assessing it can create an awareness of the changes that have to be made to the state of each individual. In evaluating a functioning community, it is vital to know the state of life satisfaction among those who are unemployed or underemployed. The Philippines has too few jobs for its population. The unemployment rate has steadily increased from 8.4 percent in 1990 to 12.7 percent in 2003. Even for those with jobs, conditions are difficult. One out of every five employed workers is underemployed, underpaid, or employed below his/her full potential(BLES, 2003). There are no longer enough job opportunities for qualified nurses. This has shown that not all nursing graduates who have passed the board exams and become Registered Nurses actually come to work in professional health institutions such as clinics or hospitals. A number of these nurses have opted for underemployment. Most of them are working as call center agents while others are actually unemployed. A small number are successfully working as nurses in the country and abroad. Notwithstanding, the level of life satisfaction is said to differ within the groups of graduates (Mongaya, 2011). With this information, this research study is undertaken to determine the dimensions influencing the level of life satisfaction among Cebu Normal University Bachelor of Science in Nursing Graduates from SY 2008 to SY 2010. Literature Review Lyubomirsky and Sousa (2001); stated that life satisfaction is a subjective assessment of the quality of ones life. It implies contentment with or acceptance of ones life circumstances, specifically the fulfillment of ones wants and needs for life as a whole. There have been many studies performed to determine variables that affect life satisfaction. Dixon and Sagas (2007) in their study stated that job satisfaction partially mediated the effect of organizational support and work-family conflict to life satisfaction. Therefore its use in many studies have been applied and even integrated into its weight on life satisfaction. Wefald, Smith, Gopalan and Downey (2008) conducted a study in understanding the relationship between life satisfaction and work satisfaction in which the result concluded that overall, satisfaction with life and work are related constructs, different individual and job factors appear to play a role in understanding the underlying dynamics of both the level of satisfaction and their association. Bakhshi, Kumar &Ranni (2009) stated in their study that job satisfaction plays an important role in determining the quality of life, summarized in evaluative component and comprised of cognitive, affective, behavioral components. The study went out to prove that satisfaction in work leads to a high level in life satisfaction. The results of a conclusive investigation with migrant workers in Taiwan by Noviantoro and Jehng (2009) revealed that the respondent who hasa high job satisfaction rate would have a higher life satisfaction scale. Their findings also indicated that job satisfaction positively affects life satisfaction. The study revealed that employees that are dissatisfied with their jobs also tend to be dissatisfied with their lives. Kamaruzaman, Zaliha, SoonYew and Mohd, S, (2009) also concluded there was no difference in the life satisfaction level between the category of academic and non-academic staff, indicates that life satisfaction is not affected by the category of work of the respondents but it was also presented that there was a significant difference between those who had worked longer in the institution, proving a significant relationship between work and life satisfaction. An undergraduate study by Arnaiz, Castro, Cruda, Dungog and Englaterra (2011) concluded that the current employment status does not affect the level of satisfaction of the employee.

Other studies have been done to evaluate life satisfaction with another dimension, Family. Family satisfaction is defined as the degree to which family members feel happy andfulfilled with each other. The study by Yunong, H (2012) confirmed some previous empirical findings, which indicated the importance of family relations to older people's lives, and extended our understanding about the correlates of life satisfaction. In his study, filial support was associated with life satisfaction for groups of older people; satisfaction with family support and filial discrepancy was only associated with life satisfaction among older people with agricultural hukous; family harmony only contributed to explaining life satisfaction among older people with non-agricultural hukous. Lightseys (2008) investigation examined whether the meaning in life mediated the relationship between cohesion and family satisfaction, the result followed that indeed there was a significant relationship between the two. Johnson, Resch, Elliott, Villarreal, Kwok, Berry and Underhill(2010) studied on patients with traumatic brain injury, which revealed that higher family satisfaction was associated with increases in life satisfaction for individuals with less functional impairment and implied that Family satisfaction appears to have pronounced beneficial effects on life satisfaction for persons with less functional impairment after TBI. A study by Frone, Russel and Cooper (2002) supports a positive relationship between both dimensions, work and family, indicating that both have a significance in overall satisfaction in life. Mustapha, Ahmad, Uli and Idris(2011) also showed in their study that there is a positive relationship with the effects of work-family factors on the relationships between dispositional and occupational characteristics which is the independent variable and intention to stay as the dependent variable. Parayitam, S. andKalra, N. (2008)presented a paper that offered a conceptual model which suggested that relationships between work and family can have strong impact on job satisfaction and life satisfaction and organizational support programs have a vital role in this process. There are other researches done that determines life satisfaction by one other aspect, and that is ones relationship with peers. In the study by Lobello, S., Underhill, A., Valentine, P. & Stroud, T. (2003) social integration, partaking in and continuing customary social relationships is a vital component of life satisfaction for persons in the general population. SI includes both the number of persons in an individual's social network and satisfaction with the amount of time spent with others. If SI is associated with greater life satisfaction in the general population, one can reasonably hypothesize that the same would be true among people who experience debilitating injuries. Boosman, H., Schepers, V., Post, M., Visser-Meily, J. (2011) study on stroke patients indicated that social activity is a predictor of life satisfaction three years post stroke. Satisfaction ratings vary across life domains with substantially lower satisfaction ratings for patients that are socially inactive. Consequently, it is important to keep activating patients to participate in social activities beyond the rehabilitation phase when most patients no longer have contact with healthcare professionals. Terry, Nielsen, and Perchard(2011) had a study that proposed that the perceived availability of support for work-related problems would have both direct and stress-buffering effects on levels of well-being, indicating that having a support system outside of home will help with ones employment problems and possibly coping in life. Sekiguchis and Katos (2003) researched on the Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction Levels of Female Graduates of a Japanese University wherein they divided life into all three dimensions (working life, family life and social life) to investigate how these three were associated with the individuals whole life satisfaction levels. Their research finding indicates that the general life satisfaction of Japanese women was high because of their good relationship with family and had strong connections to their friends but they were worried about health and the effects of aging for themselves and their families. This research showed that when the three dimensions were evaluated individually, family interaction had the most influence on life satisfaction, followed by social interaction and work environment was the least. Hypotheses Ha1: The level of life satisfaction of employed graduates is equal to the level of life satisfaction of the underemployed. Ha2: The work dimension is the most influential on the life satisfaction of the CNU-BSN graduates.

Objectives of the Study This study determined the level of life satisfaction of the graduates of Bachelor of Science in Nursing of Cebu Normal University from year 2008-2012. Specifically, the study endeavors to answer the following questions: 1. What is the level of life satisfaction of the underemployed and employed graduates in terms of the following dimensions: 1.1 Work Environment; 1.2 Family Interaction; 1.3 Social Interaction; 2. Is there a significant difference on the level of life satisfaction between the employed and underemployed Bachelor of Science in Nursing graduates of CNU? 3. What is the degree of influence on the level of life satisfaction between the CNU-BSN graduates in terms of the different dimensions: 3.1 Work Environment; 3.2 Family Interaction; 3.3 Social Interaction; Methodology This study utilized descriptive-correlational research design. The respondents of this study were 128 Bachelor of Science in Nursing Graduates of Cebu Normal University from the Academic Year 2008-2012, both employed and underemployed. They were asked to answer a questionnaire that is a modified version of the standard tool developed by Scott Huebner, the Multidimensional Students Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS). The selfadministered questionnaire was distributed individually to the graduates that are within Cebu, but the questionnaire was also posted online, so that it was made available to those outside of Cebu, specifically sent individually to the respondents via a social networking site. For the individually distributed questionnaire, it was retrieved by the researchers when the respondent was finished answering, usually 3-5 days after. The online versions results were retrieved automatically after the respondent completed the questionnaire. All data was gathered in approximately two months, Then time was given to subject the data to treatment. The data gathered was subjected to simple percentage to describe the level of satisfaction of the respondents. Also in determining the level of satisfaction of the employed and underemployed graduates, weighted mean was used. In determining the significance of difference in the level of satisfaction between employed and underemployed, the data was subjected to the independent T-Test of Mean Difference. Lastly, the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (Pearson r) determined the correlation of each of the dimensions with Life Satisfaction. Results This section presents the discussion and interpretation of the results of the study. Table 1 shows there were more female than male respondents, showing a predominance of female in the nursing profession. Most male people feel that the nursing profession is effeminate. In regards to civil status, most of the alumni are still single, with only Four (4) of the respondents are married. Table 1. Profile of the Respondents by Gender, Civil and Employment Status Gender Civil Status Employment status Male Female Single Married f % f % f % f % Employed 15 30 35 70 48 38.7 2 50 Underemployed 26 33.3 52 66.7 76 61.3 2 50 N n= number of samples f = frequency 41 87 124 4

Number of Respondents f 50 78 128 % 39.1 60.9 100

By employment status, most of the respondents are underemployed and only a considerable number are working as nurses. As seen in table 2 the number of unemployed is decreasing from 2008 to 2012 which could mean that the demand for nurses was lessened or that many graduates find call center jobs to be more efficient due to the higher income as compared to working as nurses. Table 2. Number of employed and underemployed respondents per Alumni Batch Employment status Year Graduated 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Employed Underemployed n n= number of samples f = frequency Currently, the country cannot provide all the nurses with good employment because there are not enough hospitals and medical facilities in the Philippines that can accommodate the annual flood of nurses that graduated and passed the Licensure Exam. And even if there are enough facilities, the meager salaries that are given to nurses discourage them from seeking employment as a nurse. Consequently, being a call center agent is one of the easiest jobs to enter as nursing graduates as it offers a high salary rate. Furthermore, it can be observed that the batch garnering the most number of underemployed is batch 2012. Expectedly, this trend can be attributed to the fact that their opportunities for working as nurses were very limited in comparison to the four batches (Batch 2008-2011) that had the more opportunities to work as nurses for having just recently acquired their respective licenses. The Level of Life Satisfaction of the Underemployed and Employed Graduates in Terms of the Different Dimensions The levels of life satisfaction, in the overall dimensions, of both employed and underemployed are both on the moderately satisfied level, as shown in table 3. That in the Work dimension, both types of employment indicate that they are moderately satisfied. As with the Family and Social dimensions, the level of satisfaction is highly satisfied. Table 3. Level of Life Satisfaction (Dimensions) Level of Life Satisfaction Employed Dimension Work Family Social Overall Weighted Mean 4.80 5.20 5.34 5.12 Interpretation Moderately Satisfied Highly Satisfied Highly Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Weighted Mean 4.72 5.23 5.27 5.07 Underemployed Interpretation Moderately Satisfied Highly Satisfied Highly Satisfied Moderately Satisfied f 14 13 % 51.8 48.1 27 f 12 11 % 52.2 47.8 23 f 8 8 % 50 50 16 f 13 20 % 39.4 60.6 33 f 3 26 % 10.3 89.7 29

Number of Respondents f 50 78 128 % 39.1 60.9 100

Employed graduates are more satisfied with their Work Environment than the people who are underemployed maybe because the employed people working as nurses can easily interact with people working in the same occupation, they are also exultant to work by reason of being employed in the highly preferred job. According to Noviantoro and Jehng (2009), employees that are satisfied with their jobs also tend to be more satisfied with their lives. In the aspect of Family Interaction, underemployed graduates are more satisfied than employed graduates for the reason that underemployed graduates have a higher salary received with jobs like being a call center agent which most of the undergraduates are situated and employed. After receiving the income, the family is more contented with the salary that they are receiving and can have more outings to spend more time with the family. Employed graduates are more contented with their social interaction because they can simply interact with

their associate co-workers which they can easily relate with each other because they have the same course and profession and that they love the work they have. The implication of this is that despite a difference in job type or level, the employment status does not directly affect the level of life satisfaction. Though the levels of life satisfaction of the underemployed and employed in the aforementioned dimensions are similar, it should be stressed that there are other dimensions in life that are not limited to the work, family and social sector such as physical health, psychological well-being, environmental support. Life Satisfaction between Employed and Underemployed Computation of the life satisfaction of the employed and underemployed utilizing the T-Test of Mean Difference revealed that there is no significant difference in the level of life satisfaction as shown in table 4 the TValue(0.38) is lesser than T-Critical(1.98). Thus the null hypothesis is accepted. Table 4.Comparison of Life Satisfaction of CNU-CN Alumni Paired variables Level of life satisfaction of employed and underemployed 0.05 df 126 t-value (critical) 1.979 p-value 0.621

At present, employment is still a very crucial aspect for survival in peoples lives, especially regarding the economic part of their life. Opportunities are undertaken, and whether this leads to a profession as a nurse or otherwise, responsibilities and roles are still upheld. Family relationships are still kept and interactions are still present, there is no difference to the undertaking of family problems in both employment statuses. Social relationships are also still kept; acquaintances and friends are managed individually, not significantly influenced by the type of employment. This implies realization towards the relationship of the employment status and the level of life satisfaction. Whether or not the respondents status is under being employed in the nursing field, the life satisfaction level is not affected. The construct life satisfaction is part of the perceived quality of life and an important component of wellbeing. From a conceptual perspective, life satisfaction is characterized as a subjective, cognitive appraisal of ones own conditions regarding different life domains (Rockenbauch K, Meister U., Schmutzer G. &Alfemann, D.). Those working as nurses have chosen their preferred role and are satisfied with it, despite their confirmation on the difference in earnings or financial compensation. This could be contributed to their fulfillment in their occupation which is not restricted to the earnings they receive. Those underemployed, may still be satisfied for a multiple number of reasons. Most of them are employed in institutions or companies that compensate their work generously or even higher than what is given to employed nurses. Also, their work environments, though different that hospital or clinic settings still provide an atmosphere that is adequate enough to ensure a satisfaction in the work place. Peers and colleagues, also contributes to their life satisfaction as this represents the social relationships that must be achieved to gain a high level of satisfaction in life. Likewise, the decrease in demand for nurses is a primary factor for the increasing number of underemployed nursing graduates, as the lack for opportunity to become a nurse leads to take employment in occupations rather than being stagnant and unemployed, where they would receive no earning and fewer fulfillments. Another factor to be considered is the desire to become a nurse in the beginning, a number of those underemployed would rather not want to work as nurses in the first place, though not fulfilling the task of acquiring a position of work that parallels the degree that one has graduated with, the employment of not being a nurse, fulfills a more personal desire.

Degree of influence on the Level of Life satisfaction in the Work, Family and Social Dimensions As seen in Table 5, the most influential among the dimensions is Social Interaction as it has the highest correlation value of 0.804, demonstrating that in the life of the CNU BSN alumni, may they be employed or underemployed, the social dimension of their life is most influential to their overall level of life satisfaction. Table 5. Comparison of Work Environment, Family Interaction and Social Interaction dimensions Dimension Work Environment Family Interaction Social Interaction Pearson r 0.752 0.760 0.804 Interpretation High Correlation High Correlation High Correlation 0.05 0.05 0.05 df 127 127 127 t-value (computed) 15.015 8.373 4.307 p-value 7.67343x10-9 0.0033505299 2.63206x10-8

This observation affirms the findings of Kuo, Lai & Wang (2008) which indicated that social participation, fine community network would boost life satisfaction and high social participation would encourage life satisfaction. Similarly, relationships with peers, colleagues and people who do not have familial relationships highly influence life satisfaction because these can be modified to a persons preferences relationships can be added or ended at will, if chosen to. Social interaction also generates support systems other than ones created due to bloodline or family ties, indicating a more wide scope of interaction and more experiences that contribute highly to life satisfaction. Conclusion Based on the results of the study, the researchers concluded that the degree of employability is not an exclusive measure of life satisfaction among CNU-BSN Alumni. Also, social interaction dimension impacts on the overall life satisfaction. References Adams, Gary A., King, Lynda A., &King, Daniel W. (1996).Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and workfamily conflict with job and life satisfaction.Retrievedfrom http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/apl/81/4/411 Bakhshi, A., Kumar, U., & Rani, E. (2009).Organizational Justice Perceptions as Predictor of Job Satisfaction and Organization Commitment.International Journal of Business and Management.Retrieved from http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/2600 Bollinger, C.,Coomes, P.,& Berger, M. (2003).Measuring Underemployment at the County Level. Retrievedfrom www.ukcpr.org/Publications?Bollinger_DP2003-08.pdf Boosman, H., Schepers, V., Post, M., &Visser-Meily, J. (2011). Social activity contributes independently to life satisfaction three years post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation25.5 : 460-7. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/864822811/abstract?accountid=141440 Cortese, C., Colombo, L.,&Ghislieri, C. (2010).Determinants of nurses job satisfaction: the role of workfamily conflict, job demand, emotional charge and social support. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01064.x/abstract Dixon, M. & Sagas, M. (2007 ). The Relationship Between Organizational Support, Work-Family Conflict, and the Job-Life Satisfaction of University Coaches. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 78. 3: 236-47. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/218505355/1399FFB8A45B29B617/4?accountid=141440

Fernandez, R., &Kulik, J. (1981).A Multilevel Model of Life Satisfaction: Effects of Individual Characteristics and Neighborhood Composition. Retrieved from http://eab.sagepub.com/content/29/6/793.full.pdf+html Frone, M., Russell, M., & Cooper, L. (2002).Relationship between Job and Family Satisfaction: Causal or NoncausalCovariation? Retrieved from http://jom.sagepub.com/content/20/3/565.abstract Fugl-Meyer, A., Melin, R., &Fugl-Meyer, K. (2002).Life Satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. Retrieved from http://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/download.php?doi=10.1080/165019702760279242 Huebner, S. (1998).The Multidimensional Students Life Satisfaction Scale. Retrieved from http://www.psych.sc.edu/pdfdocs/huebslssmanual.doc Johnson, C. et. al. (2010).Family Satisfaction predicts life satisfaction trajectories over the first five years after traumatic brain injury.Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/20496972 Kuo, J., Lai, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: From Youth's Social Capital Perspective. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge12.2 : 237-242. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/222851617/139A0342CEC78A73D2C/8?accountid=141440 Leont'ev, A., Davydov, V., &Engestrom, Y. (1930).Activity Theory. Retrieved from http://www.learningtheories.com/activity-theory.html Lobello, S., Underhill, A., Valentine, P. & Stroud, T. (2003).Social integration and life and family satisfaction in survivors of injury at 5 years postinjury.Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development40. 4: 293-9. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/215289435/139A00A66DC3FF40385/2?accountid=141440 Lorenzo, F.M. et al. (2006).Nurse Migration from a Source Country Perspective: Philippine Country Case Study. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC1955369/#b4 Lightsey, O.R., & Sweeney, J. (2008).Meaning in Life, Emotion-Oriented Coping, Generalized Self-Efficacy, and Family Cohesion as Predictors of Family Satisfaction among Mothers of Children With Disabilities.Retrieved from http://tfj.sagepub.com/content/16/3/212.abstract. Mongaya, C. (2011).Oversupply of nurses but no jobs. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/91509/oversupply-of-nurses-but-no-jobs Mustapha, N., Ahmad, A., Uli, J., &Idris, K. (2011).Work-Family Factors and its Relationships Between Dispositional, Occupational Characteristics and Intention to Stay. Retrieved from http://cscjournals.org/csc/manuscript/Journals/IJBRM/volume2/Issue3/IJBRM-47.pdf Namayandeh, H.,Juhari, R., &Yaacob, S.N. (2011).The Effect of Job Satisfaction and Family Satisfaction on Work- Family Conflict (W-FC) and Family-Work Conflict (F-WC) among Married Female Nurses in Shiraz-Iran.Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/9125 Noviantoro, R., &Jehng, J. (2009).The Job Satisfaction Relationship of Indonesian Women Migrant Workers in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://hr.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/conferences/15th/paper/B4-B6.pdf Nussbaum, M.,&Sen, A. (1992).Objective List Theory. Retrieved from http://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/newsletter.aspx?id=49 ODriscoll, M., Brough, P.,&Kalliath, T. (2004) Work/family conflict, psychological well-being, satisfaction and social support: a longitudinal study in New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=880841

Parayitam, S. &Kalra, N. (2008). FROM WORK-FAMILY CONFLICTS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS, JOB SATISFACTION AND TO LIFE SATISFACTION: A PROPOSED INTEGRATIVE MODEL. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict12. 2: 49-63. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/216591094/139A0082E8520AF2E7A/4?accountid=141440 Rummel, R. (1976).The Conflict Helix. Retrieved from http://www.hawaii.edu/ powerkills/TCH.CHAP9.HTM Sekiguchi, K.,& Kato, K. (2003).Satisfaction and life satisfaction levels of female graduates of a Japanese university. Retrieved from http://systemicbusiness.org/digests/sabi2003/2003_ISSS_47th_054_Sekiguchi_Kato.pdf Sekiguchi, K.,& Kato, K. (2003).Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction Levels of Female Graduates of a Japanese University. Retrieved from http://systemicbusiness.org/digests/sabi2003/2003_ISSS_47th_054_Sekiguchi_Kato.pdf Sousa, L., &Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Life satisfaction. In J. Worell (Ed.), Encylopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender. Academic Press:San Diego, CA. Vol. 2, pp. 667-676 Spector, P. (1997).Job Satisfaction.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.google.com.ph/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nCkXMZjs0XcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Spector,+P.+% 281997%29.+Job+Satisfaction.&ots=1kosUieYdR&sig=2It2TTHTQnVioyl8aWbxPM1uW1o&redir_esc= y#v=onepage&q=Spector%2C%20P.%20%281997%29.%20Job%20Satisfaction.&f=false Terry, D., Nielsen, M..&Perchard, L. (2011). Effects of work stress on psychological well-being and job satisfaction: The stress-buffering role of social support. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/00049539308259135/abstract Veenhoven, R. (1996).Happy life-expectancy, A comprehensive measure of quality of life in nations. Retrieved from http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16306/BF01078689.pdf Wefald, A., Smith, M., Gopalan, N., &Downey, R. (2008).The Relationship of Life and Job Satisfaction to Emerging Attitudes.Retrieved from http://www.midwestacademy.org/Proceedings/2008/papers/Wefald,Smith,etal_33.pdf Yunong, H (2012). Family relations and life satisfaction of older people: a comparative study between two different hukous in China. Ageing and Society32. 1: 19-40. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/pqcentral/docview/908935860/139A00479F33D7B6AAC/11?accountid=14144