Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Blair Swezey
Principal Policy Advisor National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado
Conversion systems employ a mix of traditional and non-traditional technologies. Generation can be base load, peaking, and as available.
2
Nuclear 19.9%
Coal 51.2%
3
Why Renewables?
Cleaner energy production Fixed, predictable costs Use of local or in-state resources Local economic benefits Waste reduction Can be deployed in various system sizes
Most of 1990s
Period of lower and stable energy prices discourages renewables Competition mantra works against interventionist energy policies Steady increase in RD&D expenditures; significant decrease in 1996
Actual
Projected
30
Wind Geo
20
Bio STE PV
10
Wind
10
20
30
40
50
GE WIND 1.5 MW
2000: 4 - 6 cents/kWh Increased Turbine Size and Height R&D Advances Manufacturing Improvements
NSP 107 MW Lake Benton wind farm 4 cents/kWh (unsubsidized)
10
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000
*Year 2000 dollars
Capacity (MW)
11
100 90 80 70
6000 5000
Capacity (MW)
1. Germany: 14,000 MW 2. United States: 6,374 MW 3. Spain: 5,780 MW 4. Denmark: 3,094 MW 5. India: 1,900 MW World total 2003: 37,220 MW
19 82 19 83 19 84 19 85 19 86 19 87 19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03
United States
Europe
Rest of World
12
Multijunction Concentrators Three-junction (2-terminal, monolithic) Two-junction (2-terminal, monolithic) Crystalline Si Cells Single crystal Multicrystalline Thin Si Thin Film Technologies Cu(In,Ga)Se2 CdTe Amorphous Si:H (stabilized) Emerging PV Westing- ARCO Dye cells house Organic cells
(various technologies)
Boeing Kodak Boeing University RCA of Maine RCA RCA RCA RCA No. Carolina State University Kodak
NREL/ Spectrolab
Spire Spire Stanford UNSW Georgia Tech University So. Florida ARCO Boeing Boeing UNSW
UNSW
UNSW
UNSW NREL Cu(In,Ga)Se2 14x concentration UNSW NREL NREL NREL NREL AstroPower United Solar NREL
Sharp
Georgia Tech
Varian
NREL Euro-CIS
Solarex
AMETEK Monosolar Boeing RCA AstroPower Solarex University of Lausanne Kodak UCSB Photon Energy United Solar
8 4 0 1975
RCA
University of Lausanne
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
13
Actual
Projected
14
1976
10.0
2002
1.0
80% Learning Curve: Module price decreases by 20% for every doubling of cumulative production
90%
75 GW
80% 70%
561.8
390.5
100 0
GridConnected 13%
Remote Industrial 35% Consumer Power 13% GridConnected 58% Remote Habitation 19%
Consumer Power 4%
18
19
150
100
Biomass
50
MSW
Concluding Remarks
RE technologies are likely to continue historical improvement in cost and performance from a combination of RD&D and increased market deployment. In the absence of a more aggressive federal approach to deployment, state policies will continue to lead the way. RPS and SBC policies establish minimum public support levels for renewables supply or investments. Green pricing programs allow customers to support higher levels of renewables development through voluntary purchases. Financial incentives compliment other policy approaches by lowering production costs. Combinations of policies are likely to achieve the best outcomes.
21