Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Introduction
p.3
I
-
Art
of
place
p.4
II
Body,
object
and
space
as
one
p.5
III
-
Experience
and
relation
of
object
and
space
p.6
IV
Impact
on
urban
spaces
p.7
Conclusion
p.8
Illustrations
p.9
Bibliography
p.12
Fine
Art
2/Period
1/
VIA
203
2
Introduction
Within
this
essay
we
find
the
integral
comparison
and
highlights
on
common
ground
as
well
as
the
main
contrasts,
between
two
sculptures,
Spiral
Jetty
(fig.1)
and
Sequence
(fig.2)
from
Robert
Smithson
(1938-1973)
and
Richard
Serra
(1939),
respectively.
Before
introducing
the
sculptures
a
few
notions
on
the
origin
of
this
kind
of
art
and
its
understanding
are
explained.
I
put
effort
in
making
the
relation
of
these
new
works,
clear,
bringing
up
the
early
changes
in
sculptures
history,
when
the
site-specific
appeared
and
brought
along
the
disappearance
of
the
pedestal
as
well
the
iconographical
representation.
Moreover
it
is
discussed
how
two
distinct
works
share
the
same
purpose
of
existence
and
how
they
interact
and
change,
not
only
the
space
but
also
the
viewers
perception.
I
-
Art
of
place
By
1930s
artists
started
to
think
differently
and
developed
a
new
form
of
art,
the
art
of
place,
instead
of
the
art
of
time.
Practice
was
no
longer
defined
in
relation
to
a
given
medium
sculpture
but
rather
in
relation
to
the
logical
operations
on
a
set
of
cultural
terms
(Krauss
1986).
A
relation
formed
between
the
new
medium
that
now
could
be
anything
and
the
surrounding,
which
somehow
expanded
it.
This
expanded
field
was
originated
by
problematizing
a
set
of
oppositions.
Through
the
reduction
of
the
sculptural
medium
into
simpler
volumetric
structures,
they
reached
a
neuter
term
of
the
not-landscape
plus
the
not-architecture.
Obviously
there
was
no
reason
not
to
imagine
the
exact
opposite
both
landscape
and
architecture
to
what
Rosalind
E.
Krauss
(1941)
refers
as
the
complex
in
her
structural
graphic
(fig.3).
Structures
such
as
labyrinths
or
mazes
and
Japanese
gardens
are
both
landscape
and
architecture.
()
They
are
part
of
a
universe
or
cultural
space
in
which
sculpture
was
simply
another
part-not
somehow,
the
same.
Their
purpose
and
pleasure
is
exactly
that
they
are
opposite
and
different.
(Krauss
1979:
30-44)
With
the
Partially
Buried
Woodshed
(fig.4)
at
Kent
State,
Ohio,
by
Robert
Smithson,
the
complex
axis
began
to
be
occupied,
which
can
be
called
as
site
construction.
The
combination
of
landscape
and
not-landscape
result
in
on
what
some
call
marked
sites
that
could
not
only
be
actual
physical
manipulations
of
sites
like
Smithson's
Spiral
Jetty,
but
other
forms
of
marking
as
well.
Meanwhile
Serra
was
one
of
the
first
artists
to
explore
the
possibilities
of
architecture
plus
not-
architecture.
In
every
case
of
these
axiomatic
structures,
there
is
some
kind
of
intervention
into
the
space,
which
consist
on
a
process
of
mapping
the
axiomatic
features
of
the
architectural
influences
onto
a
particular
given
space.
This
method
results
in
the
reflecting
the
condition
of
the
logical
space
as
experience.
Fine
Art
2/Period
1/
VIA
203
4
Fine
Art
2/Period
1/
VIA
203
5
Southampton Solent University David Leal These natural causes are essential to both artists, especially to Smithson, who defended that the returning of his works to an undifferentiated matter represented the inescapable process of decay, which meant the defeat of technology. Despite approving some limited measures to maintain and preserve his works, which I perceive as an attempt to slow down time, he didnt want the deterioration to be entirely arrested, due to hes interest in natures long process of taking control. Contrarily, Serra takes advantage with what Smithson somehow despises, the technology breakthrough. With the help from the materials characteristics and the way the sculpture is built, Serra manages to suggest tension. How both pieces are made is another important aspect. Without the evidence of the process they would become sculpturally weaker, in my point of view. In Serras case, the steel is what shapes the place. If we had the same object built in various materials such as plastic, wood or even glass, it would transmit a different experience as the one we get. The importance of the piece is not only on the created object, but on how it will shape the space in which it is inserted as well. But how did Serras works invade the urban public space? If someone refused to experience the sculpture there would be no purpose, it would be null.
Conclusion
In
my
point
of
view
there
is
a
clear
and
strong
connection
between
time,
space
and
body,
being
the
body
in
both
cases
the
experience
generated
by
the
objects;
Movement
through
and
around
the
works
is
what
connects
all
these
elements,
which
is
how
the
body
knows
and
registers
the
space.
The
key
thought,
is
that
the
human
perception
and
the
human
experience
are
embodied
along
with
the
radical
transformation
of
the
context
in
which
they
are
placed.
Art
allows
us
to
grow
as
individuals,
by
activating
and
awakening
our
most
personal
and
deep
experiences.
If
not
for
the
object
nor
the
subjects
apprehension,
there
would
be
no
outcome
whatsoever,
very
much
like
the
question:
If
a
tree
falls
in
the
forest
and
no
one
is
around
to
hear
it,
does
it
make
a
sound?
The
answer
is
no,
because
sound
is
"something
that
you
hear"
and
since
no
one
is
there
to
hear
it,
there
is
no
sound.
This
thought
can
be
applied
and
adapted
to
either
Spiral
Jetty
or
Sequence.
If
no
one
is
around,
does
it
originate
experience?
The
answer
remains
the
same,
no.
So
we
can
conclude
the
object
and
subject
activate
each
other
and
the
experience
is
real,
only
when
a
dialogue
between
him
and
its
environment
is
initiated.
This
phenomenological
aspect
is
what
manifests
inside
the
conscience
based
on
perception,
in
order
to
conceive
that
same
experience.
Those
are
the
fundamental
concepts
of
the
sculptural
space
and
their
conforming
bases.
Lastly
I
find
that
the
main
beauty
about
this
particular
type
of
works
resides
on
taking
a
closer
look
to
the
relation
between
object
and
viewer,
considering
that
the
sculptures
are
alive.
While
these
works
are
new,
a
certain
tension
is
generated
between
nature
and
mankind,
which
reflects
into
an
inside
conflict
within
the
observer,
the
key-element
like
when
Spiral
Hill
was
recent
(fig.9).
In
time
that
tension
becomes
loose
and
all
characteristics
turn
into
something
else.
They
become
old,
like
we
(humans)
do.
This
long
morphing
process
of
ageing
decay
is
as
if
the
sculptures
their
selves
were
alive,
and
therefore,
like
all
living
beings,
eventually
they
die.
The
compulsive
urge
for
a
connection
between
the
spectator
and
the
piece
is
a
struggle
for
survival.
Their
life
is
instable
due
to
the
constant
changes
of
existence.
On
one
hand,
when
alone
they
are
dead,
while
on
the
other,
when
providing
experience
and
connected
to
the
viewer
they
are
once
again
reborn.
Illustrations
10
Fig.8 Spin Out blended in space. Fine Art 2/Period 1/ VIA 203 11
Bibliography
Books:
Enrich
Martin,
Rosa
Mara.
1995.
Conceptos
Fundamentales
del
Espacio
Escultrico.
Publicaciones
Universidad
Del
Pas
Vasco.
Hopkins,
David.
2000.
After
Modern
Art
1945-2000.
Oxford
Paperbacks.
Krauss,
Rosalind
E.
1981.
Passages
in
Modern
Sculpture.
London:
The
MIT
Press.
Krauss,
Rosalind
E.
1979.
The
Originality
of
Avant-Garde
and
Other
Modernists
Myths.
London:
The
MIT
Press.
Roberts,
John.
1990.
Postmodernism
Politics
and
Art.
Manchester
University
Press.
Films:
BBC Open University Production Centre, Modern Art: Practices And Debates, Smithson And Serra: Beyond Modernism? (1994). Rose, Charlie, A conversation with artist Richard Serra (June 2007), http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/8534 MoMA Exhibitions, Richard Serra Sculpture: Forty Years (September, 2007), http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2007/serra/flash.html Fine Art 2/Period 1/ VIA 203 12
13