Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ralina L. joseph
Transcending Blackness
Transcending
Blackness
–
—
–
ralina l. Joseph
DukeuniversityPress
DurhamanDLonDon 2013
©2013DukeUniversityPress
Allrightsreserved
PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmericaonacid-freepaper♾
DesignedbyHeatherHensley
TypesetinWhitmanbyTsengInformationSystems,Inc.
LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataappear
onthelastprintedpageofthisbook.
ForJJ,t J, an Dnv
––
—
Contents
––
—
PreFaCe
FromBiracialtoMultiracialtoMixed-Race
toCriticalMixed-RaceStudies ix
introDuCtion
ReadingMixed-RaceAfricanAmericanRepresentations
intheNewMillennium 1
p a r T i : T h e n e w M i l l e n n i u M M u l aT Ta
1.TelevisingtheBadRaceGirl:
JenniferBealsonThe L Word,theRaceCard,and
thePunishmentofMixed-RaceBlackness 37
2.TheSadRaceGirl:
PassingandtheNewMillenniumMulattainDanzySenna’sCaucasia 67
p a r T i i : T h e e x c e p T i o n a l M u lT i r a c i a l
3.TransitioningtotheExceptionalMultiracial:
EscapingTragedythroughBlackTranscendenceinMixing Nia 95
4.RecursiveRacialTransformation:
SellingtheExceptionalMultiracialonAmerica’s Next Top Model 125
ConCLusion
RacistJokesandtheExceptionalMultiracial,or
WhyTranscendingBlacknessIsaTerribleProposition 155
notes 173
BiBLiograPhy 201
inDex 219
PreFaCe
––
—
Intheautumnof1992,IarrivedattheoldestdormonBrown
University’scampus,astately,crumblingedificecompletewith
ivy-coveredwallsandcinder-blocklinedroomsthatrebelled
against my efforts to tack up my leftie political posters and
batik-printtapestry.Iwasanervouskidoutfittedinmeticu-
louslyrippedjeans,tanBirkenstocks,andalingeringfearthat
anadmissionsofficerwasgoingtopopoutatanymomentand
announcethattherehadbeenabigmistake:I,thedaughter
ofasecretaryandamechanic,reallywasnotallowedintothis
hallowed IvyLeagueinstitution.Classandrace,andmyex-
haustingeffortstoavoidtalkingaboutboth,structuredmylife.
Whileclassremainedamore-easilysubmergibleentityinneo-
bohemian,grunge-accentedProvidenceoftheearly1990s,the
changingsignsandsignalsofraceglowedandblinkedlikemy
ownpersonalfluorescentsign.Iworriedthatmyraciallyam-
biguousbutclearlynonwhitelooksmademehypervisible,and
beforegoingtocollegeIbobbedandweavedtheubiquitous
“whatareyou?”questions,tosavemyselffromhavingtoreveal
whatIshruggedoffasmyracestory.
Myeffortstoremainraceneutralweresupported bymy
utterlackoflanguagetobegintochipawayattheraceques-
tion.BeforecollegeIhadneveruttered“multiracial.”“Mixed”
wasthetermweusedinsidemysuburbanVirginiahouseand
“biracial”seemedpopularwithoutsidersreferringtome.Butevenwithin
theconfinesofmyimmediatefamily,thosetermswerenotmyown:they
weremonoraciallyapplieddescriptorsthatdidnotquitematchupwith
my interior racialized self. At Brown I found myself embraced by the
vibrantcommunityofstudentsofcolorandgiventhelanguagetounder-
standthatmyuniqueracializationwasnotallthatspecial,arevelation
thatwasacompleteandtotalrelief.Isoonlearnedofthetermmultiracial
asan“us”term,oneappliedbymixed-racepeopleintheprocessofself-
identification.Tomeitquicklymeantcommunity;itmeantnothavingto
definemyselffurther;itmeanthavingasafespacetocollectivelyarticu-
latemyfrustrationwiththeoutsideworld’sconfusionaboutmypheno-
type.Asafirst-semesterfirst-yearconfrontedwiththenew-to-meterm
“multiracial,”Iembraceditimmediately.Atseventeen,Icouldnothave
imaginedthatthatwordwouldentermydaily,evenhourly,vocabulary
overthenextfouryearsatcollege.IntheUnitedStatesduringthetwenty-
firstcentury,racializedlabelsarejustasmultiple,contentious,andslip-
pery as they were during the twentieth century, but for me, that new
word,“multiracial,”andthatalone,feltjustperfect.JustasStuartHallbe-
cameblackinJamaicaofthe1960swiththeadventofBlackNationalism
intheUnitedStates,IbecamemultiracialinNewEnglandofthe1990s
withtheadventofthemultiracialstudentmovementonmyliberalcollege
campus.1Iwasprivatelymixedforthefirstseventeenyearsofmylifeuntil
Ipublicallycameoutasmultiracial.
MyinitiationintotheworldofmultiracialitycameaboutattheThird
WorldCenter(twC)whosemonikerboreits1960sactivistroots.There
IlearnedoftheBrownOrganizationofMultiracialandBiracialStudents
(BomBs),agroupthatsomestudentleadershadstartedtwoyearsearlier.
WhenBrown’sparadigm-shiftingminoritystudentorientation,theThird
WorldTransitionProgram(twtP),askedparticipantstobreakoutinto
racialaffinitygroupsessions,anumberofmultiracialfirst-yearshadfelt
split about where to go. So they created their own multiracial affinity
group,whicheventuallybecameBomBs.WhenIwasfirstintroducedto
thegroupIrememberimmediatelylovingtheimplieddestructioninthe
group’sname,whichwassocountertotheotherblandlymulticultural
studentgroupnamesIwouldcometobefamiliarwith,suchas,“prism”or
“mosaic.”Asmycomingintoamultiracialconsciousnessdidnothingless
thanexplodemyearlierattemptsatracialneutrality,BomBsresonated
withmymixed-racialepistemology.
Preface
—
x
Wemodeledourorganizationaftertheuniversity’sexistingracialsup-
portandadvocacystudentgroups,suchastheOrganizationofUnitedAfri-
canPeoples(ouaP),theAsianAmericanStudentsAssociation(aasa),and
theLatin-AmericanStudentsOrganization(Laso),whichmodeledthem-
selvesaftertraditionalcivilrightsgroups.BomBsmeetingstookplacein
thewarmembraceofthetwC,incommunitywithotherstudents-of-color
groups.Inordertopopulateourmeetingsinthoseearlypre-emaildays,
BomBsmembersroundeduprecruitsbyofficialmeans,includingpost-
ingfliersforthegrouparoundthecampuscafeteriasandunofficiallyby
slylyapproachingtheraciallyambiguousdormmatedownthehall.InSep-
temberof1991,ayearbeforeIarrivedatBrown,BomBsputoutitsfirst
flier:2
BoMBs!
BrownOrganizationofMulti-andBiracialStudents
Thisisanorganizationespeciallydesignedforanyandallpersonswho
haveeverfeltleftoutormarginalizedbymembersofgroupstowhich
theypartlyorwhollybelong.Ourorganizationisintendedasasupport
groupforbi/multiracialormulticulturalpeoplewhohaveinthepast
beenforcedto“choose”betweenthedifferentracesandculturesthat
arepartsoftheiridentities.
Inthepast,wehavebeenignoredandtreatedasthoughwewere
invisible, solely because we have always been defined in terms of
other people. no more. The reason why our people have been
ignoredthroughouthistoryisbecausetherehasneverbeenanysort
ofpoliticalbaseorforumfromwhichtomakeourvoicesheardand
toraisesociety’sawarenessofourexistence.Presently,organizations
likeourshavebeenspringingupatcollegecampusesnationwiDe.
Why? Because our numbers are growing. With the absence of anti-
miscegenationlawssince1967,andtheconsequencesthereof,there
aremoreoFusthaneverBeFore.EventheU.S.governmenthas
beenforcedtositupandtakenoticeofus,astheyarebeingpressured
toincludeusasaseparatecategoryontheyear2000censusforms.
Whydowesay“ourpeople”?Because,likemembersofotherrecog-
nizedracialgroupsinthiscountry,ourpeopleDohaveacommonex-
periencefromwhichtodrawunityandsolidarity.Notonlydowefeel
thesameracismfromthewhitemajorityasdoourotherThirdWorld
brothersandsisters,butwegetitfromthemaswell.Werefusetositby
Preface
—
xii
you?Nomore.Thisorganizationisimportantbecauseitwillallowus
tohaveaseparatespaceformultiracials,wherewecandefineourselves
intermsofourselves,andnotintermsofothergroups.Whatweneed
arecommittedpeoplewillingtosticktogetherandcarveanichefor
ourselvesatthisuniversitysothatourvoicescanbeheard.Previous
attemptsatstartingandmaintainingsimilarorganizationsinthepast
havefailed,butonlybecauseoflackofsupportorcommitment.Butwe
knowthatyou’realloutthere(we’veseenyou).Don’tjustwishusluck.
Comejoin,bond—unite!
Readingthesewordssomanyyearslater,Icanseehowthisraciallypro-
vocative organization spoke so eloquently to kids like me, the multi-
raciallyawkwardsoulwadingthroughlateadolescenceintheearly1990s.
Onephrasethatparticularlyjumpsouttomeis“we’veseenyou.”Iwon-
dernow:Isitanobservation?Alure?Athreat?Awinkfromoneinsider
toanother?Thewritersassumedthatweracialoutsiderssharedmulti-
racialpainandexclusionandtheconcomitantdesiretobecomevisible,a
desiretobecomeraciallylegible,named,andclaimed.Toexchangestatus
as“them”for“us.”Theirrhetoricassertedthatgroupidentityalonewould
createaspaceforoursupportandresistance.
Thesetwodocumentsfromthe1991–92schoolyearrepresentthevery
beginningofBomBs.TheywerethefoundingdocumentsthatIporedover
asafirst-year.Ijoinedandbeganattendingweeklymeetings,laterplan-
ningthosemeetingsandleadingtheorganizationforward.Asmultiracial
studentactivists,wewerestruckbythesensethatweweredoingsome-
thingnewanddifferentintheveryoldworldofrace.InBomBsIfounda
communityoffellowself-describedracialoutsiders.Regularstendedtobe
peoplelikemylate-teenageself,whoseself-identitywasboundupinthose
threelittlewords,notaromantic“Iloveyou,”butanincredulous“what
areyou?”ThroughconversationsatBomBsIunderstoodthatIdidn’thave
toanswerthatquestionthewaytheaskerintended.ThatIcouldturnthe
questionaroundonmyinterrogator:whydoyouwanttoknow?ThatI
couldidentifyinanunsatisfyinglynebulousway.AlthoughIneverper-
sonallydescribedmyselfas“human”or“American”assomeofmyfellow
BomBsmembersdefiantlydid,Igaveannoyinglynebulousanswerssuch
as“womanofcolor”thatallowedmetoprovideapoliticizedresponseand
yetavoidlayingbaremypersonalhistory.Irelishedbeingabletoresist
“whatareyou?,”whichtomewasakintoavoidingopeningaveintothe
Preface
—
xiv
mentofscholarshipintheUnitedKingdom,“mixed-race.”Asafirst-and
second-yearcollegestudent,Ifoundthesebooksthrillingbecausethey
defended,named,andhistoricizedmyownexistence.
Mixed-race was the object of my personal, political, and academic
study—afull-blownpreoccupation.IlearnedasmuchasIcouldaboutthe
history,literature,andracializationofmixed-racefolks.ThroughBomBs,
myhavenofthetwC,twtP,allofthevariousprogramssupportingstu-
dents of color, and my coursework in American civilization, then Afro
American(nowAfricana)studies,semiotics,literaturehistory,andsoci-
ology.Ialsolearnedaboutlargerquestionsofrace,class,gender,sexuality,
and,mostimportantly,power.Ilearnedthatracializedchoice,akeyvalue
ofthemultiracialmovement,wasnotanoptionformost,whileracial-
izedconscription,whichwespecialmixiesfoughtagainst,was.Ilearned
aboutstructuralracismandhowtoexplorethelivedrealitiesofrace,from
differentialratesofhomeownership,healthcare,andhighschoolgradua-
tionrates,amongothermeasures.Consequently,Isoonfoundthatques-
tionsofpowerwerelargelyabsentfromearlymultiracialmovementlit-
erature.Ifoundmyselfquestioning:whathappenedafterwecreatedour
ownterms?Outsideoffulfillingone’sownself-identitydesiresorsating
thecuriositiesofonlookers,whatdoesatermthatprovidesan“accurate”
accountof“whatmixes?”or“whatpercentages?”reveal?Whathappens
afterthemissingstoryistold,ortheincorrectstoryisrighted?Whathap-
pensafterwejointhetable?Andmostimportantly,werewereinforcing
theracialorderratherthanblowingitup?
ThesebuddingquestionsconvergedinmysenioryearatBrownwhen
Iwroteathesisontherepresentationsofacross-sectionofmixed-race
womeninmagazineadvertisements,astudythatdrewonthemultiracial,
interdisciplinary track I had been pursuing. I identified two dialectics
ofrepresentation,“crossover/spice”and“beauty/beast”andarguedthat
theseadvertisementsoverwhelminglysoughttocategorizeandexoticize
mixed-racewomen,demonstrating discomfort withmiscegenation and
multiracialsthemselves.Eventhoughmystudy,inretrospect,wasoverly
ambitious, methodologically questionable, and incoherently written in
places(inmyattempttosoundsimilartothetheoryIfoughttocompre-
hend),researchingandwritinginanewscholarlyareawassoexcitingthat
IrealizedthatIwantedtomakeacareeroutofmyquestioning.Iwanted
tobeanacademicwhostudiedmultiraciality.
OverthecourseofmyfouryearsatBrownIlearnedthatthe“what
Preface
—
xvi
niedthisembraceof“themultiracialcause.”8Forexample,inthemid-to-
late1990s,NewtGingrich,theformerRepublicanSpeakeroftheHouse,
alignedhimselfwithaso-calledmultiracialcause,andsupportedsuch
measuresastheadditionofa“multiracial”categoryonthe2000U.S.Cen-
sus,whichwas,muchtothechagrinofmultiracialactivists,defeatedin
lieuofa“markoneormore”option.Becauseofthesestrangecollabora-
tionsIbeganquestioningthepoliticians’,themedia’s,andevenmyown
embrace of multiracialism. Was love of mixed-race people really love,
orwasitadisguisedhatredofmonoracialAfricanAmericans,aformof
codedantiblackracism?
Theantiblackracisminthemultiracialmovementfromthe1990sdid
notfitwithmymultiracialcollegeactivism,andyetitstuckwithme.It
unsettledmetounderstandhowpoliticiansandthemediamanipulated
multiracialismintoanalignmentof“mypeople”withthepoliticsofthe
FarRight.Understandingthesplitdividingnationalmultiracialadvocacy
groupsfromcollege-basedactivistshelpedmeseewhysomeofmyclosest
friendsaroundthecountry,whoweremixedblackandwhiteandwho
grewupwithclosetiestoAfricanAmericancommunities,didn’twant
anythingtodowiththismultiracialthing.Whyweren’ttheirstoriesapart
oftheburgeoningnarrativeofmixed-race?Otherquestionsloomedfor
me:Inourcelebrationsofmixed-race,wereweexcludingordismissing
theexperiences,histories,andracializationsofotherminoritizedcom-
munities?Howcouldmultiracialismworktodismantleandnotfortifythe
privilegesofwhiteness?Howcouldwearticulateouragendainawaythat
mightforgecross-racialcoalitions,insteadofseparations?
After I left college I began to answer many of my questions on the
utilityofmixed-racethroughthewritingsoftheessayistLisaJonesinher
bookBulletproof Diva(1994).IhadreadJones’sessaysinitiallyinhercol-
umnintheVillage Voice,andIthoughtaboutthemtimeandagainasIde-
velopedmyownmultiracialresearchagenda.Jonescapturedthe“what
areyou?”question—thevarietyofwaysinwhichmixed-racepeopleare
oftenquestionedbecauseoftheir“raciallyambiguouslooks”—betterthan
anyonehadmanagedtodo:
Who are you, what are you, where are you from, no, where are you
reallyfrom,whereareyourparentsfrom,areyourgrandparentsAmeri-
cans?Areyoufromhere,what’syourbackground,what’syournation-
ality,wheredoyoulive?Areyoublack,areyouwhite,doyouspeak
Preface
—
xviii
eledethical,positivescholarshipandprovidedthesupportnecessaryfor
metofinishmydissertation—andtheyalongwithAllison,Mike,Alonzo,
andAvaMarieSmithkeepmelongingforOakland.AttheUniversityof
Washington, wireD(WomenInvestigating Race,Ethnicity, and Differ-
ence)hasbolsteredmethroughmanyalong,grayday,andIwanttothank
allthemembersofourcollectiveformakingSeattleanintellectuallyand
personallyproductivespace;mywireDwritinggroup,LeiLaniNishime,
HabibaIbrahim,andTyinaSteptoeforvalidatingandpushingmywork;
andLuisFragaforhissupportofwireD.Mystudents,includingManou-
chekaCeleste,MadhaviMurty,ElizabethCortez,AnjaliVats,KateBell,
Kris Mroczek, Jennifer McClearen, Tabitha Bronsma, Jamie Moshin,
VanessaAu,MoniqueLacoste,CamilleElmore-Trummer,DesireéBoyd,
MicheléPrince,JuanaReid,andtheBarbadoscrew,helpedthisworkto
comealiveintheclassroom.MycolleaguesCrispinThurlow,Christine
Harold,LeahCeccarelli,ValerieManusov,JerryBaldasty,DavidDomke,
MichelleHabell-Pallan,SonnetRetman,AngelaGinorio,JudyHoward,
AndreaGriggs,andLeaVaughnwarmlywelcomedmeintotheuwfold.A
specialthanksforthepedisandpeptalkswithmySeattlesisters,Janine
Jones, Alexes Harris, and Joy Williamson-Lott; raucous laughter with
WadiyaUdell;coffeeshopworkdateswithJenNeighbors;andfamilyfun
with the Kalbach-Udells, LaBordes, Fabers, Joneses, Bonney-Retmans,
Espanias,andWu-Floyds.Avarietyoffellowshipsprovidedmewiththe
timeandspacetothink,includingtheAmericanAssociationofUniver-
sityWomen,theUniversityofCaliforniaPresident’sFellowship,theFord
Foundation,andtheWoodrowWilsonCareerEnhancementFellowship.
Whenmyfaithinthisprojectwaned,theadvice,support,andcritiqueof
DaphneBrooks,MattJacobson,LauraHelper-Ferris,KenWissoker,and
mytwoanonymousreviewersrocketedmethroughmyrevisions.Thank
youtoShosannaWeinbergerforallowingherincredibleimagetograce
thecoverofthebook.IwillbeforevergratefultotheUniversityofWash-
ington’sWhiteleyCenterforprovidingmewiththemostbeautifulspace
intheworldtothinkandwrite.MuchlovetomyfamiliestheLandwehrs,
Captains, D’Souzas, Whites, and Scanlans. My utmost appreciation to
thepeoplewhoencouragedmetoasktoomanyquestions:myparents,
RichardandIreneLandwehr,andGrandpi,JesseMeeks.
Mostofall,IthankJames,TJ,andNaimaJosephforendlesslyembrac-
ingtheirspaceypartnerandmama.Welivethisbookeveryday.Questions,
comments,compliments,complaints,andjokesaboutmultiracialityare
Preface
—
xx
introDuCtion
––
—
Ihaveneverbeenathomeinmybody.Notinitscolor,notinitssize
orshape.Notinitsstrange,uniqueconglomerationoforganicforms
andwavylines....There’sanawkwardnesstomybody,alackofgrace,
asiftheracialmix,thetwosidescomingtogetherinmybodyhaveyet
toreconcile.
—rebecca walker, Black, White, and Jewish
Forayoungmanofmixedrace,withoutfirmanchorinanycommunity,
withoutevenafather’ssteadyinghand,theessentialAmericanideal—
thatourdestiniesarenotwrittenbeforeweareborn,thatinAmerica
wecantravelasfarasourenergyandtalentswilltakeus—hasdefined
mylife.WithamotherfromKansasandafatherfromKenya,Iknow
thatstorieslikeminecanhappenonlyintheUnitedStatesofAmerica.
—Barack obama, “what is patriotism?”
Introduction
—
2
‘rules’wereinternalizedbyAfricanAmericanswhoconvertedthemfrom
meresignifiersofshametomarkersofpride.”3Representationsofblack-
nessassomethingtobetranscendedflyinthefaceofthehistoricembrace
ofmultiracialAfricanAmericansinAfricanAmericancommunities.Such
flatrepresentationsofmixed-raceAfricanAmericansbeliethecomplexity
ofreal-lifeexperiencesofsuchsubjects,wholivesimultaneouslyasblack
and mixed-race, in a messy multiplicity that is rarely contained in any
racializednomenclature.
Racializedexpression,includingnomenclature,isnotaforegonecon-
clusionbutaformofrepresentation,whichStuartHalldescribesas“an
essentialpartoftheprocessbywhichmeaningisproducedandexchanged
betweenmembersofaculture.”4Representationsarevehiclesthatdrive
controllingandalternativeimagesofrace,gender,class,andsexuality,the
socialforcesthatgovernoursociety.Popularculturalrepresentationsare
fertileareasofstudybecausetheyallowustoanalyzethemythsofourcul-
ture,orasHallputsit,“popularculture...iswherewediscoverandplay
withtheidentificationsofourselves,whereweareimagined,wherewe
arerepresented.”5Inotherwords,popularrepresentations,whereiden-
tityisimaginedasbothasiteofsocialdominationandagency,transform
seemingfictionsofracializationandsexualizationintosomethingclose
toreality.EvelynnHammondsarguesthatvisualrepresentation,inpar-
ticular,isafundamentalscholarlysitebecause“intheU.S.racehasalways
beendependentuponthevisual.”6
Butsuchrepresentationsdonotsimplycreatemeaninginaone-way
process.AsHallandtheOpenUniversityscholarsillustrateintheirfa-
mouscircuitofculture,becauseoftheinterplayofaudiencesandtexts,
culturereflects,critiques,andcreateschangingideologies.7Justascul-
tureisperpetually mutating,soareracialmeanings.Michael Omiand
HowardWinantexplainthatraceisnotanessence,but“anunstableand
‘decentered’complexofsocialmeaningsconstantlybeingtransformedby
politicalstruggle,”aprocessthatworkstoapplyracialmeanings,which
theydeemracialization.8Becausebothcultureingeneralandracialrep-
resentationsmorespecificallyaredynamic,itmightseemthatshiftsin
culture keep up with quick transformations in racialization. Racializa-
tion works by means of cultural representations, and representations
actualizeracialization;putanotherway,livedexperiencesofraceinform
representational ones, and representational race informs experience.9
Changesincultureandracializationdonot,however,immediatelytrans-
Introduction
—
4
andviceversa.Indeed,thisbookisconcernedwithimagesofmixed-race
AfricanAmericanwomenwhobeforethepopularityofObamawerethe
mostprevalentsignifierofmixed-raceblackness.Thestereotypeofthe
tragicmulattohas,inactuality,beenthetragicmulatta,whoseexcessive
sexualappetitesnecessitateheruseandabusebywhitemen.
Mixed-raceAfricanAmericanrepresentationsfrom1998to2008have
crystallizedthetwo-sidedstereotypeofthenewmillenniummulattaand
theexceptionalmultiracial.Thesearewatershedyearsforunderstanding
aneweraofracepoliticsintheUnitedStates,andthepoliticsofmulti-
racialU.S.blacknessinparticular.Thetimefrom1998to2008comesin
theaftermathofthepassionatedebatessurroundingmixed-raceidentifi-
cationandthecensus.14Partofthepoliticsofthecensus,themajorpoliti-
calissuesurroundingmixed-raceinthelate1990sandearly2000s,con-
cernedcitizenschoosingahigh-prestigegroupanddisidentifyingwitha
lowerone.15SpanningtheendofBillClinton’spresidency,allofGeorgeW.
Bush’syearsinoffice,andtheelectionofBarackObama,theseyearsillus-
trateamomentwhentheso-calledcolor-blindpoliticsoftheBushera
(withitsmuchheralded“diverse”cabinet)vehementlyerasedtheClinton
era’snonthreateningandcursorynodtomulticulturalism.TheObamaera
cameinatthetailendwithanewbreedofmulticulturalismcumcolor-
blindpost-racialism.
Inthistimeperiod,neoliberalcitizenshiphasbeenperfectlyanddis-
cursivelyembodiedbysuch“naturally”post-racialcitizensasmixed-race
AfricanAmericans,whoseveryexistence,theliteralfusionofhistorically
bifurcatedblack-and-whiteAmerica,portendstheendofracismandiden-
titypoliticsintheUnitedStates.In1997,asKimberlyMcClainDaCosta
notes,“theOfficeofManagementandBudget(omB)officialsweredecid-
ingthefutureof[multiracialpeopleand]censusclassifications,”and,as
HabibaIbrahimexplains,the“celebrityandself-namingofTigerWoods”
proclaimedthemultiraciallyuniqueterm“Cablinasian.”Andin1998,the
mainstreamnewsmediaexplodedoverthenewlyimaginedmultiracial
subject.16Attheotherendofthedecade,2008remainsalandmarkyear
inracialandmixed-racialhistory,theyearthenation’sfirstmultiracial
AfricanAmericanpresidentwaselected.Obama’sascensiontothehigh-
estexecutiveofficeoftheUnitedStatesmakeshim,andtheexceptional
multiracial,theultimatesignofmixed-raceblacknessinthebeginningof
thetwenty-firstcentury.17
Inthesetenyears,codedanti-blacksentimentsoperatedinavariety
Introduction
—
6
umbrellametaphorofblacktranscendence.Thetropeofblacktranscen-
dencethatcirculateswithinrepresentationsofmixed-raceAfricanAmeri-
cansillustratestheflourishingofanti-blackracism,despitethecontinued
desirefor“blackcool,”anddespitetheexistenceofthefirst(multiracial)
(black)president.Ultimately,mixed-raceAfricanAmericanrepresenta-
tions—andbyextensionthesubjectivitiesofmultiracialAfricanAmeri-
canindividuals—continuetobedelimitedbytheracistnotionthatblack-
nessisadeficitthatblackandmultiracialpeoplemustovercome.Thevery
languagethatAmericansusetonamethesefigures,andthepainfullega-
ciesofracialdebatesfromabolitionthroughthecivilrightsmovement,
shapemyanalysisoftheexceptionalmultiracialmillenniummulatta.
The etymologies of the terms applied to those with one black and one
whiteparentilluminatetheprocessesoftheirracialization.Withtheswell
ofinterestinissuesofmixed-racecomesaconcomitantconcernabout
multiracialterminology.Thenotionof“mixed-race”and“monoracial”as
separatecategoriestodescribecertainAfricanAmericanscanseemal-
mostnonsensicalandvoluntary,andyetrepresentationsofmixed-race
blacknessdojustthis.Contrarytomuchpopulardiscourseonmixed-race,
thefactofmixingdoesnotautomaticallydisproveracialcategoriesbe-
causethetermsthemselvesincluderace:thenamesformixed-racepeople
signaltheirgroundinginraceitself.Indeed,theveryabilityto“mix”races
restsuponthepremisethatraceisastableandsingularentity.Reflect-
ingthiscomplicatedhistory,welackapithy,neutraltermformixed-race
AfricanAmericansthatisnotirreparablydamagedbyitstroublingpast.
“Mulatto”isnotaviablecandidate.DespitethefactthataNew York Times
coverstoryin2011announcedthatyoungmultiracialAmericansarere-
claiming“mulatto,”Ihavenotpersonallyencounteredawidespreadrec-
lamationoftheterm.19
IntheanthologyInterracialism,WernerSollersillustratesthetroubled
historyof“mulatto”byincludingtheOxford English Dictionary’stracingof
thetermfromitsSpanishandPortugueseetymologyofanimalism(“mu-
latoyoungmule,henceoneofmixedrace”)toitsuseasadescriptorof
sicknesslike“mulattojack,”meaning“atermforyellowfever,”toa“mu-
lattocomplexion”generallydescribedasunfortunately“tawny”incolor.
However,theterm’shistoryisfarfromsimplynegative.Theprivilegedma-
terialityofmixed-raceblacknessisevidentinhistorictiesbetween“mu-
Introduction
—
8
rackObamawasactually‘blackenough.’”24Asanoutblacklesbianwitha
Frenchwifeandwhitetwindaughters,Sykes’splayingwiththetropesof
blackessentialismremainsinnocuous:shetoocanbereadasinauthenti-
callyblackbytheimagined“blackauthenticitypolice,”soshehaslicense
tomakesuchajoke.25AsthecameracutstoObama’slaughing,openface,
thejokeisshowntobelightheartedribbingandnotnastyindictment.All
threeexamplesshowhow“mulatto”variouslyproducesdisgust,desire,
andplayfulrejectionoftheimaginedandembodiedmultiracialAfrican
Americanbody.
Whyis“mulatto”fodderformainstreamcomedy?Like“Negro,”itisan
anachronistictermclearlycementedtoapasthistoricalmoment.How-
ever,“Negro”isnotgenerallydeployedwithincomedicsettingsmeantto
appealtoabroadswathofthecountry,suchasnetworksitcomsandpresi-
dentialroasts.Noris“Negro”acceptablyusedbywhitepeopleinmain-
streamcomedy,asinthefirsttwoexamples.Inaworldinwhichliberals
andconservativeslament,genuinelyandnot,theso-calledPCpoliceand
asubsequentsurveillanceofthecorrectuseofracializedlanguage,does
“mulatto”remainfunnyandpopularbecauseitisanostensiblyharmless
racejokeaboutaseeminglypost-racialgroupthatis,byitsverydefinition,
safelypassedoppression?26
Thehistoryofthetermmakesitimpossibleformetouse“mulatto”as
contemporaryracializednomenclature.Nevertheless,wedonothavea
shortandnoncontentioustermformixed-raceAfricanAmericans,asthe
term“hapa”isformanymultiracialAsianAmericans.27Whenspecificity
isthegoal,alternativeterminologysuchas“black/white”issimplycon-
fusing. The self-described multiracial movement of the 1990s chose as
itsmajorpoliticalissuethecreationofa“multiracial”categoryonstate
andfederalforms,aninstitutionalandnationalopportunitymovementof
self-definitionandself-naming.Thisactivismstemmedinpartfromthe
introductionofnewterminology,suchas“multiracial”fromtheUnited
States–based movement of scholarship and activism and “mixed-race”
fromasimilarsetofscholarshipandactivismintheUnitedKingdom.28
These two terms were popularized in the explosion of scholarship fol-
lowingthepsychologistMariaRoot’santhologyRacially Mixed People in
America(1992).However,intheUnitedStatesduringthetwenty-firstcen-
tury,racializedlabels,evenrelativelynewones,continuetobeconten-
tiousandslippery.Becauseoftheveryrealpossibilitythatusingterms
Introduction
—
10
theanxietyoverrace.Inordertolaythegroundworkforthecontempo-
raryrepresentationsIanalyzeinthisbook,Iprovideamostlychronologi-
calgenealogythatillustratesthepainandanxietyofraceactualizedinthe
figureofthenewmillenniummulatta.Thisgenealogy,startingwithcon-
demnationofmixinginthecoloniesandendingwiththeendofU.S.anti-
miscegenationlaws,onlybecomesfullyevidentbyexaminingthehistory,
socialscientificresearch,literaryandfilmrepresentations,andcriticism
thattogetherproducethenewmillenniummulatta.Thenewmillennium
mulatta figure that composes half of the representational landscape of
contemporarymultiracialAfricanAmericansisindeliblymarkedbythe
stereotypeofthetragicmulatta.AspartIofTranscending Blacknessillus-
trates,thenewmillenniummulattaisa“racegirl”:aself-reflexivechar-
acterwhoisknowledgeable,angry,orsadaboutandself-consciousofher
tragicdestiny.Nevertheless,despitehermanyeffortstothecontrary,she
isunabletoperformoutsidetheconfinesofthetragicmulattaandends
upinevitablylivinguptothestereotype.Wherearethetragicmulatta’s
rootsintheUnitedStates?
Thefirstanswerliesintheparentcauseofmultiracialism.Interracial
unions,asrepresentationsofmixed-raceAfricanAmericansareinextri-
cablyentangledwiththehistoryofU.S.antimiscegenationlaw.31In1661
thecolonyofMarylandenforcedthefirstantimiscegenationlawinwhat
wastobecometheUnitedStatesbyprohibitingmarriageamongwhites
and blacks and Native Americans. Following suit, for more than three
hundredyears,thirty-eightstatesestablishedandenforcedantimiscege-
nationlawsbetweenwhitesandpeopleofcolor.32Suchracializedbound-
aries worked to actually create race; the story goes that race precedes
mixed-race,butthehistoryofantimiscegenationlawsillustratesthatthe
opposite is true. As early as the 1600s, white North American settlers
calledmulattoesa“spuriousissue”andan“abominablemixture,”demon-
strating,inthewordsofThomasGossett,adesire“tokeeptheracessepa-
rate”;mixed-raceisthereforetaboofromthemomentofconquest.33
However,powerfulwhiteforcesconsolidatedtheirrulethroughthe
useofmixed-raceblackbodies;theircreationinslaverywasencouraged
through interracial sex and procreation, although their legitimacy was
disallowedthroughbansoninterracialmarriage.EugeneGenoveseex-
plains how “self-serving slaveholders” created and perpetuated stereo-
types about slaves’ lusty sexual appetites in order to justify their own
sexualviolenceagainstblackwomen.34ScholarssuchasLisaZeWinters
Introduction
—
12
tionofthetaboounionofwhitenessandblackness:themulattamythi-
cally embodied dark sexual deviance and white acceptability.43 Some
whitemenhighlyprizedAmericanmulattasfortheirsexualdesirability,
andyetsimultaneouslyandparadoxically,inordertodiscourageracemix-
ing,earlytheoreticianscondemnedmultiracialsashavingasicklycounte-
nancestemmingfrompsychologicaldysfunction.44
Thebodyofamulattoormulattahasinspiredconsiderablescientific
debateoverthecourseofAmericanhistory.Discussionsaroundthebe-
ginning of the nineteenth century highlighted the “hybrid-degeneracy
theory”where“mulattoes—likemules—tendtobebarren,”because“no
speciesofanimalsinthenaturalworldwasknowntohavedevelopedfrom
theunionoftwoseparatespecies.”45Inthemid-1800sscholarsstudied
mulattoestodiscernthebiologicaldistanceorproximitybetweenblacks
andwhites.JohnMenckewritesthat,particularlyintherealmofmanu-
mission, “although mulattoes were generally classed as Negroes in the
United States, distinctions were drawn between mulattoes and blacks
duringtheante-bellumperiod.”46Anextensiveseriesofanthropometric
studiesduringtheU.S.CivilWarmeasuredvirtuallyeverybodypartofsol-
diersandconcludedthat“full-blood”blackswerephysiologicallyinferior
towhites,andmulattoeswereinferiortoboth“parent”groups.47Afterthe
deathofthisdebate,mulattoeswerestillseenasdifferentandoften“su-
perior”byvirtueoftheirwhiteblood,butwere“classed”with“full-blood”
blacks.48Foregroundingsocialandnotbiologicaldegeneracy,in1871Dar-
winshotthroughthebiologicaldebateinhisownracistway,arguing,“the
seeminglylowfertilityrateofmulattosresultedfromthedegradedand
anomalous position of their class; their absorption into the black race;
and,ofcourse,theassumedprofligacyofmulattowomen.”49Thesede-
bates,whichwereineffectinearnestuntilapproximately1910,werein-
formedbybiologicaldeterminism,orscientificresearchthatsoughtto
explainhowdifferent“races”were,infact,different“species.”50
Aftertheabolitionofslavery,theU.S.Censusdistinguishedbetween
mulattoesandNegroesfrom1870,whenitfirstfullycountedblackciti-
zensashumanbeings,to1920,whenitdeemedthatcensusworkers’prac-
ticeofeyeballingcitizenstodetermineracialancestryhadbecomeim-
possibleandestimatedthat75percentoftheblackpopulationhadsome
degreeofwhiteorNativeAmericanheritage.51Intherealmofspatialseg-
regation,thecaseofPlessy v. Ferguson(1896)putanendtoquestionsabout
legaldifferencebetweenNegroesandmulattoes.Creatingthe“separate
Introduction
—
14
influentialcinematicportrayalofmixed-racewomanhood,demonstrates
suchanindeliblefilmicattachmentofmixed-racetosex,whichcannotbe
escapedduringanearlycentury-longtranslationtothenewmillennium
mulatta.Thislandmarkfilmspinsataleoftheromanticizedglorydaysof
thepre–CivilWarSouth,theunnecessaryU.S.CivilWar,theunlawful,de-
segregatedSouthoftheReconstructionperiod,andthefinaltriumphant
riseofwhitesupremacyandcontrol.60
D.W.Griffith’sfilmThe Birth of a NationwasbasedonThomasDixon’s
novelsThe Clansman(1905)andThe Leopard’s Spots: A Romance of the White
Man’s Burden, 1865–1900(1902),61anditwasalsoinspiredbyPresident
Wilson’sunquestionablyracistHistory of the American People(1902).The
filmwasthusinformedbynostalgicwhitemaleSouthernerslivinginthe
Northaroundthebeginningofthenineteenthcentury.InThe Birth of a
Nation,brutesexualityinformswhitefearofnewlyfreedslavesdesirous
ofmiscegenation.Thestorylinesincludetalesofanattemptedrapeofa
youngwhitegirlbyGus,ananimalisticblack“buck,”andaventuredmar-
riagebetweenSilasLynch,ashameless,rabble-rousingmulatto,andElsie
Stoneman,apureandprominentwhitewoman.Inaddition,The Birth of a
NationfeaturesLydiaBrown(playedbythewhiteactressMaryAlden),a
passionate,calculating,andslightlyinsanemulattawhoishavingtwoaf-
fairs:onewithapowerfulwhiteabolitionistcarpetbaggerandtheother
with a mulatto insurrectionist. Like all of the principal “black” actors,
Lydia’scharacterperformedinblackface(brownface).
In the mulattoes’ characterization, while both Silas and Lydia are
shown as sexually driven and keenly intelligent, Silas organizes large
numbersofSouthernblackswhileLydiaschemescrazilyinbackrooms.
Silas’smixedbiologyallowshimtothinklogically,“likeawhiteman,”but
lustafterwhitewomen,“likeablackman,”whereasLydia’smixedbiology
appearstodriveherinsane.Lydia’sinvisiblewhitenessallowshertobe
intelligentandattractiveandhervisibleblacknessforceshertobecon-
nivingandhypersexual.Theunstablemixcreatesherinsanityandlustfor
power.GriffithportraysthemulattacharacterofLydiaasruledbytheen-
twinedforcesofsexualdesire,mentalinstability,andaneedforpower.
Lydia’sclothesalwaysappeartobefallingoffherbody,denotingtheun-
controllablecombinationofunbridledsexualenergyandunstablemen-
talcondition.Lydia’sdisheveledappearancecanalsoreferencetherape
of her mother inLydia’s own conception. Her mixed-race female body
isunquestionablyoutsideoftruewomanhood,whichiscodedaswhite,
Introduction
—
16
herquestionherracialallianceas“justblack”byseekingpartnershipwith
awhiteman.
Thefilmicimageofthetragicmulattaboresomuchpowerbecauseof
itsechoinginadditionalculturalspaces.JustthreeyearsafterThe Birth of a
Nation’srelease,EdwardReuterpublishedThe Mulatto in the United States
(1918),oneoftheearliestandmostcomprehensivesocialscientifictakes
onthetragic-mulattomyth:“Psychologicallythemulattoisanunstable
type [because] between these two groups, one admiring and the other
despising,standthemixedbloods....Theyareuncertainoftheirown
worth;consciousoftheirsuperioritytothenativetheyarenowheresure
oftheirequalitywiththesuperiorgroup.”67Reuter’sdenigrationofthe
“uncertain”and“self-conscious”mulattoissymptomaticofapalpablefear
ofwhite-appearingmixed-racebodiesinfiltratingwhiteAmerica.Where
the hybrid-degeneracy theory expressed just twenty years earlier high-
lightedabiologicalpathology,Reuter’snarrativeoftragedyfocusedupon
psychologicaldysfunction.68
Theotherlandmarksocialscientificmulattobook-lengthstudy,Everett
Stonequist’sThe Marginal Man(1937),usesthesociologistRobertPark’s
theoryofthetaxonomicallyin-between“marginalman,”originallydevised
forJewsandotherwhiteethnics,andextendsitto“raciallyhybridized
people.”69ButwhileParkcelebratedhismarginalmanasamoremodern
creationwhosecosmopolitannatureallowedhimtomovebetweeniden-
titycategories,Stonequistassertsthatthemixed-blood’sliminalposition,
being“tornbetweentwocoursesofaction,”resultsinpsychologicaldys-
functioncharacterizedbya“nervousstrain,”self-absorption,hypersen-
sitivity,“racialdisharmony,”a“clashofblood,”andan“unstablegenetic
constitution.”70Thebiological,andhenceunchangeable,natureofthisde-
scriptionisparticularlysalient.Withtheirtheoriesofhybriddegeneracy
andthemarginalman,Stonequist’sandReuter’sbookshavebeenregu-
larlyreferencedinscholarshipfromtheirhistoricalmomentuntiltoday,
demonstratingtheindeliblemarkoftragedyonthebodiesofmixed-race
AfricanAmericans.71WhileReuterandStonequistfocustheirsociologi-
calstudiesonmenandwomen,therepresentationalsubjectofmixed-race
popularculturewasalwaysoverwhelminglyawoman.
ThemultitextualnarrativeImitation of Lifefurtherdefinedthemythof
thetragicmulatta.Imitation of Life,initiallyanovelpublishedin1933by
FannieHurst,wasturnedintotwomelodrama“weepies,”afilmbyJohn
Stahlin1934andanotheronebyDouglasSirkin1959.Ifocusonthemore
Introduction
—
18
reading,thetragicmulattaisbrutallyutilitarianandcruellyambitiousas
sheusestheoccasionofhermother’sdeathtomoveupinsocialstatus
andrace.
SusanKohner,thedaughterofawhiteAmericanfilmagentandaMexi-
canfilmstarandwhoplaysthecharacterofSaraJane,wasdescribedcon-
sistentlyas“white”bythefilmstudio’spressmaterials.Shewascastin
themovieintheaftermathoftheHollywoodMotionPictureProduction
Code,ortheHaysCode,whichfunctionedasHollywood’sownversion
ofanantimiscegenationlaw.Ineffectfrom1929to1952,representations
ofmiscegenationwerebannedinHollywoodalongwith,inLindaWil-
liams’swords,“theveryexistenceofamixed-racecharacteronthescreen
. . . [because he or she demonstrated] problematic proof of the prior
‘crime’ofmiscegenation.”76Exemplifyingthemultiplelevelsofimitation
orperformanceseenthroughoutImitation of Life,Kohnerisaso-called
whiteactressperformingtheroleofablackwomanwhoimitatesawhite
woman.However,thereareclearlimitstotheboundariespushedinthese
portrayals;thefilmisonlyanimitationofborderbreaking,or,asSirkput
it,of“socialcriticism.”Indeed,Sirkfellshortofhisstateddesiretomake
“socialcriticism,”andinsteadheendedupproducinganidentityfilm,de-
voidoftheracializedpoliticaleconomyoftheNewDeal,WorldWarII,
andcivilrightsperiods.77Buttheseissuesarenotabsentfromthefilm:
insteadofplacinghisactionandallofhischaractersinthemidstofthese
struggles,Sirkmakesthetragic-mulattacharacterSaraJanethefilm’ssole
bearerofsocialconsciousness.Intheend,the1950s-eramulattacannot
beanythingbuttragicbecausetoempowerherwouldbetocelebratemis-
cegenation.
In pop culture and scholarship, the multiracial African American
scriptedasthetragicmulattalargelyfelloutofvogueinthecivilrights
era. Discussions about antimiscegenation laws were often attached to
issuesofcivilrights.However,itisimportanttopointoutthatinterracial
marriageandnotinterracialsexwasmadeillegal.Whiletheinstitutionof
marriagedictatesthehandingdownofappreciablecommodities,theact
ofsexdenotesnolegallegitimacy.In1945thesociologistsHoraceCayton
andSt.ClairDrakediscernedthis,writing,“manywhiteswillcontinueto
exploitthefearofintermarriageasameansofretainingeconomicdomi-
nance.”78Morerecentscholarscontendthatinadditiontotheprotection
ofwhitewomanhoodandthepreventionofthemiscegenatedbody,the
rootoffearsregardinginterracialmarriagealsolayintheguardianship
Whilethegenealogyofthenewmillenniummulattabeganwithwhite
racist condemnation of colonial-era mixing, the genealogy of the ex-
ceptionalmultiracialbeginswithwhiteracist“defense”ofblackbodies
throughabolitionism.Argumentsforabolitionismflourishedinpopular
culture,puttingforwardanexceptionalmultiracialastheotherfaceof
thetragicmulatta.Whilethefailureofthemixed-raceblackbodyconsti-
Introduction
—
20
tutesasignificantportionoftheimageofthemultiracialAfricanAmeri-
canbody,theexceptionalmultiracial,thefocusofpartIIofthisbook,
istheotherhalfofthehistoricimageofmixed-raceAfricanAmericans.
Antislaveryfictionpositedthatthemulattoormulattacharacterisnot
onlydamnedforbeingaproductofthetragicunionoftheraces,butheor
sheisalsovaluableforhavingameasureofwhiteness.Althoughthemu-
lattohasbeendemeanedthroughoutmuchofAmericanhistory,therehas
alwaysbeenacontingentofblackAmericansandwhiteAmericanswho
havecelebratedmultiracialexceptionalism.Intheexceptionalmultiracial
typology,prizingmixed-raceblacknessover“pure”blackness,justasdeni-
gratingmixed-raceblacknessover“pure”whiteness,servesthepurpose
ofvaluingwhitenessaboveblackness.Inshort,whilewhitessometimes
feared mulattoes because of their proximity to whiteness, they valued
themforthisveryreason.
InabolitionistliteraturesuchasHarrietBeecherStowe’sUncle Tom’s
Cabin (1852), mulattoes were imagined to be imbued with greater
humanitythanfull-bloodblacks.Abolitionistsfeaturedmulattobodiesas
thekeytoillustratingtheinhumanityofslavery,83andparticularlybeau-
tiful(read:white-looking)youngmulattaswereshowcasedbyabolition-
iststogainsupportfortheircause.Forexample,beginningin1848,the
whitepreacherfromNewYorkCityandbrotherofHarrietBeecherStowe,
HenryWardBeecher,heldso-calledantislaveryauctionswherehewould
paradeyoung,near-white-lookingfemaleslavesaroundhiscongregation
inordertoraisethemoneyrequiredtobuytheirfreedom.84Throughout
theyearsoftheseauctions,“thegirls(allofthemChristianandattractive)
grewwhiterandwhiter,untilin1856Beecherfoundand‘auctioned’one
slavewhowascompletelyindistinguishablefromoneofhisparishioner’s
fairestdaughters.”85
Aspasserslavesondisplayforabolitionists,exceptionalmultiracials
aremorevaluablethanmonoracialAfricanAmericansbecausetheyare
akintothese“beautiful,”safegirls.Thecauseofthenewmillenniumisnot
puttinganendtochattelslavery(withoutsignificantchangetoracialized
inequalities)butratherputtinganendtotheideaofrace(again,without
significantchangetoracializedinequalities).86JulesZangernotesthatthe
tragic-mulattocharacteralsotooktheguiseofapasserwhowasoftenre-
ferredtoasthe“‘tragicoctoroon[,]’...abeautifulyounggirlwhopos-
sessesonlytheslightestevidencesofNegroblood.”87Herbeautyiscentral
toherportrayalandherabilitytogarnersympathyfromwhites.Thus,the
Introduction
—
22
lationshipsasillicitdidnotvanishovernight,Lovingsignifiesaturning
pointinAmericanattitudestowardimagesofmixed-racepeopleandin
thenumbersofthosepeople.
Civilrightslegislationalsohelpedtransformmixed-raceimagesinto
a multiracial “hope.”94 The Southern historian Joel Williamson’s New
People: Miscegenation and Mulattoes in the United States(1980),takingits
namefromaphraseinthenovelistCharlesChesnutt’sHouse behind the
Cedars(1900),demonstratessuchcivilrights–eraoptimism.Inrefuting
thehybrid-degeneracytheory,Williamsonromanticizesmixed-race,stat-
ingthatmultiracialswillhealAmerica’sstill-festeringracewound.Assum-
ingablack-whiteparadigm,Williamsondescribesmixed-racepeopleas
“thefirstfullyevolved,smoothlyfunctioningmodelofapeoplewhohave
transcendedbothanexclusivewhitenessandanexclusiveblacknessand
movedintoaworldinwhichtheyacceptandvaluethemselvesforthem-
selvesalone—asnewandunique,asindeed,anewpeopleinthehuman
universe.”95Asrepresentationsofso-callednewpeople,theimagesIex-
aminebothexpressandcritiquemuchofthisoptimism,longingforand
lamentingthetimewhenmixed-raceindividualswillbe“justpeople”and
not“justblack.”
But in the 1980s, civil rights gains spurred a conservative backlash.
Interestingly, instead of multiracial subjects feeling the conservative
wrath along with other people of color, they found that conservatives
“celebratedandpoliticallyrecognized”themasmodel-minorityfigures.
This political atmosphere of mixed-race exceptionalism, which helped
electBarackObamain2008,persists.Inthepost–civilrightsera,cele-
bratory mixed-race images abound as multiracial people experience a
newracializationintheUnitedStates.Mixed-raceAfricanAmericans,as
anewmodelofanimagined-to-bederacializedpopulation,havebeenen-
visionedasracialbridgestoanewUnitedStates.Theyarethesumofall
racesand,therefore,noraceatall.NeoconservativeandneoliberalAmeri-
cansdeployimagesofmixed-racesaviorstosoothewhitefearsofallocat-
ingequalauthoritytopeopleofcolor.Andyet,asMichaelOmisuggests,
“despitelegalguaranteesofformalequalityandaccess,racecontinuesto
beafundamentalorganizingprincipleofindividualidentityandcollective
action.”96Inotherwords,theAmericanracializedpowerdynamichasnot
changedwithaso-calledpositiveshiftinimagesofmixed-racepeople.
Forthefirsttime,mostoftheauthorswritingonmultiracialityfrom
theearly1990sonwardexplicitlyidentifiedthemselvesintheirtextsas
Introduction
—
24
racialcause,supportingsuchmeasuresastheadditionofa“multiracial”
categoryonthe2000U.S.Census(thiswasdefeatedinlieuofa“mark
oneormore”option).101Neoconservativesinthepost–civilrightseraof
the1990salignedthemselvescloselywith“themultiracialcause,”which
somehow gave them license to deploy the language of the civil rights
movementinamannercountertothemovement’sprogressivepolitics.
Variousreactionary,anti–affirmativeactionorganizationsusecivilrights
language,includingTheCampaignforColorBlindAmericaLegalDefense
andEducationalFoundationandTheAmericanCivilRightsCoalition.102
Intheirverytitles,theseorganizationsco-optcontemporarycallsfordi-
versity,multiculturalism,andcolorblindness.103
Argumentsagainstapplyingrace-basedmeasuressuchasaffirmative
actionsurfaceinwhatthesociologistEduardoBonilla-Silvadescribesas
“color-blindracism”wherediscoursesofraceignoranceeffectivelywork
to reinscribe racialized discrimination and safely insulate racists from
allegationsofracism.104Somecelebrationsofmixed-race,forexample,in
theexceptionalmultiracialformulation,constituteatypeofcolor-blind
racism where multiraciality is used to mean “no race” despite the per-
sistence of structural racialized inequalities. This connection is illumi-
natedbyCatherineSquiresinthemassmediaarena:“Inmostmainstream
mediaaccounts,multiracialidentityisyetanothervehiclefordenyingthe
socialimportofraceandreinforcingthedominantnotionthatraceisa
matterofindividualtastesandpsychology,notstructuralinequalities.”105
In a stark example of Squires’s statement, Ward Connerly, the neo-
conservativeideologue,formerUniversityofCaliforniaregent,andau-
thorofCalifornia’sProposition209(theanti–affirmativeactionmeasure
inCaliforniafrom1996),nowclonedaroundthecountry,usesimagesof
rapidlyincreasingnumbersofmixed-racepeopleastheexampleofwhy
racenolongermatters.Suchanassumptionisbasedonthenotionthat
interracialmarriageandmultiracialpersonhoodvoidtheissueofracein
bothprivateandpublicspheres.Connerlyarguesthatraceshouldbemade
opaquethroughbillssuchastheproposedandfailedRacialPrivacyIni-
tiativeof2003,whereracialandethnicdatawouldhavebeenprohibited
frominclusiononstateforms.However,manycriticsoftheseeffortshave
pointedoutthatracializedinequalitiesandnotraceitselfareobscured
througherasuresofrace-basedmeasures.106Inotherwords,ignoringrace
failstoremoveitfromitsintrinsictietotheeconomic,social,cultural,
andhistoricfabricoftheUnitedStates.Aspartofthiseffort,multiracial
Introduction
—
26
identities themselves is “post-race,” which stems from the ideology of
colorblindness.112Similarly,another“post,”post-feminism,iscontingent
upontheassumptionthatthesecondwavefeministmovementeradicated
sexismtotheextentthatitnolongerexists,soissuesofpatriarchyand
genderdiscriminationaresimplymoot.113Justasraceandgenderinter-
sectinthestereotypesunderconsiderationhere,thegambitsofpost-race
andpost-feminisminformeachother.
SusanKoshywritesthatpost-raceisametaphoricexpressionofthe
“futureperfecttense,”somethingthatwillmagicallyhappenifsimplyde-
scribed as coming to fruition.114 Post-race equates the power of people
ofcolor’sracializationwithwhiteracialization.MaryWatersnotesthat
whitesseetheirethnicityas“optional,”avoluntarylabel.Formanywhites,
accordingtoWaters,“ethnicityisincreasinglyapersonalchoiceofwhether
tobeethnicatall,and,foranincreasingmajorityofpeople,ofwhicheth-
nicitytobe.Anethnicidentityissomethingthatdoesnotaffectmuch
ineverydaylife.”115Thisphilosophybecomesdangerouswhenpeopleof
colorareassumedtohavethissameflexibility,orthesameabilitytothrow
offforcesofracializedascription.Thephilosophyof“optionalethnicity”
can lead to “neo-racism,” in the words of philosopher Etienne Balibar,
whichisa“racismwithoutraces,”producedthroughavarietyofsophis-
ticatedpractices,discourses,andrepresentations.116Imagesoftheexcep-
tionalmultiracialcanstandinaspoliticallycorrectneoracism,acelebra-
tionofwhitenessanddenigrationofblackness.Thebestevidenceabout
theanti-blackracismthatconstitutestheexceptionalmultiracialfigureis
thewayinwhichaconjuringoftheexceptionalmultiracialfrequentlyac-
companiespoliticalmovessuchaserasuresofrace-basedinitiativeslike
affirmativeaction.
Becauseracializeddiscoursesareundeniablygendered,andgendered
discoursesareundeniablyraced,Transcending Blacknessworkstopresent
animbricatedcritiqueofraceandgender,whichinthecaseoftheexcep-
tionalmultiracialisalsoacritiqueofpost-raceandpost-feminism.Post-
feminismcapitalizesuponthefeministideaofchoice.Post-feminismdic-
tatesthattheUnitedStatesinthetwenty-firstcenturynolongerneeds
theantiquatedidealsof1970s-erafeminismbecausewehavereacheda
stateofgenderequity.SusanJ.Douglastracestheterm“post-feminism”
to a New York Times Magazine article from October 1982, “Voices from
thePost-FeministGeneration.”117Post-feminismwaspopularizedinthe
1990sbysuchwhitefemalecriticsasNaomiWolf,CamillePaglia,and
We are in the midst of what scholars and critics have dubbed the “bi-
racialbabyboom.”122Theswellinmultiracialbirthshasbeenwelldocu-
mentedbyscholars,activists,andfederalandstategovernments.123Since
the1990sthetopicofmultiracialityintheUnitedStatesexplodedina
varietyofrealms,includingsocialscienceandhumanitiesscholarshipand
Introduction
—
28
films,fiction,andtelevision.Mixed-raceisatopicofinterestinpolitical
arenasaswell.Fromtheearly1990suntiltheannouncementin1997of
the“checkoneormore”categoryonthe2000U.S.Census,publicdebates
onmixed-racecenteredonthecountingandidentificationofmultiracial
people.
Despitetheiroverrepresentationinpopularculture,multiracialAfri-
can Americans are not the largest or fastest-growing of all multiracial
groups. In her analysis of the 2000 U.S. Census, Ann Morning reports
thatonly5percentofallAfricanAmericanrespondentsmarkedtwoor
moreraces,while,bycomparison,14percentofAsianAmericansdid.124
Byhistoricalcomparison,in1918,whenwhitemaleenumeratorsandnot
individualsaccountedforracializedlabels,governmentofficialsestimated
thatapproximately75percentofallAfricanAmericanshadsomenon-
blackancestry.Comparingthe1918andthe2000figures,wecanalsosur-
misethatpeoplewhoclaimmultiracialblacknessareusuallyfirstgenera-
tion;apersonwithoneblackparentandoneparentofanotherracewould
bemorelikelyto“markoneormore”thananAfricanAmericanperson
whomightbemultigenerationallymixed-race(e.g.,someonewhohastwo
multiracialparents).
Risingmixed-racenumbers,whiledramatic,donot,inthemselves,re-
vealanynewtruthsabouthowraceoperates.Suchnumbers,produced
todaythroughself-identification,arefarfromscientificanddonotneces-
sarilyreflectthenumbersofmultiplyracedpeoplewithintheU.S.popu-
lation.Inaddition,thequestionofhowscholarsarriveatthesenumbers,
ofcheckingboxesandcountingraces,ishighlycontested.Censusstatis-
ticsarehypervaluedinscholarlyandpopularrealmsbecausetheyreveal
thechangingdemographicsofthecountry.However,inthepublicsphere,
debaterarelymovesbeyondexcitementortrepidationoverthemixingof
Americatotrulyquestionwhatsuchchangesmeanforlifechances.The
constant,differentialratesofpoverty,bycomparison,areshownfarless
frequently,andthedramaticspikeinincomeinequalityisnotfairgame.
Indeed,ournewmillenniumisalsomarkedbythepersistenceofracial-
izedinequality.Despitethisevidence,someculturalworkerspromotethe
twenty-first-centurysolutiontotheproblemofthecolorline,totweak
DuBois’sfamousphrase,asracemixing.125
The census is essentially another representation. Scholars who ana-
lyzethemultiracialnumbersfromthe2000U.S.Censuscontendthatde-
batesonmixed-racearereallyaboutmultiracialAfricanAmericans,even
Introduction
—
30
tolivedexperience?Theanswertothisquestionliesinthescriptingof
thequintessentialpost–civilrightssubject,personifiedmostdramatically
inthefigureofObama,asoftenmixed-race.Hybridityandbordercross-
ing, two qualities underscored as ideals in the post–civil rights United
States,areconstitutivetotheinterracialfamilyandtheinterracialbody,
for whom navigating multiple identities is an everyday means of exis-
tence.Butthisqualitydoesnotmakemultiracialsexceptional.TreyEllis
andotherauthorsassertthatcontemporarymonoracialAfricanAmerican
artistsembodyahybridized“NewBlackAesthetic...[that]shamelessly
borrowsandreassemblesacrossbothraceandclasslines.”Theseartists,
deemed“culturalmulattoes”byEllis,“grewupfeelingmisunderstoodby
boththeblackworldsandthewhite.”131Mixed-racerepresentationsillu-
minatehowraceisaconstruction,and,atthesametime,howtheforces
ofracializationandthehistoricone-dropruleofhypodescent,temperele-
mentsofpersonalvolition.
Themixed-raceAfricanAmericanrepresentationsfrom1998to2008
engageissuesofmultiracialblackracializationandsexualization,tragedy,
andprivilege.Ichosetheparticularworksexaminedinthebookbecause
theyfeaturefictionalandnonfictionalmixed-raceAfricanAmericansself-
consciouslyengagingwithracialized,gendered,class,sexuality,andcolor
performancesand,often,crises.Theseparticularworksarerepresenta-
tiveofthisparticulartimeperiodandparticularsubgenreofmultiracial
AfricanAmericanrepresentations.Notsurprisingly,identityisverymuch
atthecoreofthesepopularlyconsumedworksandmanyoftherepresen-
tationsarebothaboutandby“us,”andnot“them.”InpartI,“TheNew
MillenniumMulatta,”Iinvestigatelate-twentieth-andearly-twenty-first-
centuryrepresentationsofthereimaginedtragicmulatta,aself-reflexive,
highlysexualized,and,tovaryingdegrees,ultimatelyangryandsadfigure
whosesalvationwouldcomeaboutthroughblacktranscendence.Inchap-
ter1IanalyzeJenniferBeals’sportrayalofBettePorteronthepopular
televisiondramaThe L Word.IcontendthatBeals’sperformanceofthe
angryracegirlBetteismiredintragic-mulattamisfortune;haughty,beau-
tiful,arrogant,andemotionallyvolatileBetteiscontinuouslypunished,
justlikethehistorictropeofthetragicmulatta.Bettestandsoutbecause
ofthepaucityofimagesofmultiracialblackwomenontelevision.Thefew
representationsofmixed-raceAfricanAmericanandwhitewomenexist
primarilyinblackensemblecasts,suchasthesitcomsThe Jeffersons,A Dif-
ferent World,andGirlfriends.132Televisionstudiesscholarsnotethattele-
Introduction
—
32
engageintheexceptionalmultiracialmasqueradebytradingraces.My
readingrevealstheclearcorporateforcescolludingtosellpost-race,post-
feminism,andblacktranscendence.Notably,theserepresentationsalso
reflect1990s-eraideasofidentityfluiditytakentoincredibleextreme.For
example,StuartHallwritesthatwhileitmightbesurprisingtosome,“the
representativemodernexperience”isactuallyoneofbeing“dispersedand
fragmented.”137Hallarguesthatidentitiesarenot“armor-platedagainst
otheridentities”andare“nottiedtofixed,permanent,unalterableoppo-
sitions.”Hethusproposeschoosing“identifications”over“identity”be-
cause“onceyou’vegotidentification,youcandecidewhichidentitiesare
workingthisweek.”138However,andimportantly,exceptionalmultiracial
representations do not illustrate another vital part of Hall’s arguments
aboutidentity:whiletheymightbefluid,theyarealso“historicallyspe-
cific”anda“setofpractices.”
Whether in the guise of the new millennium mulatta or the excep-
tionalmultiracial,themixed-raceAfricanAmericanbodyisstilltiedtoan
imagined,excessivesexuality.Aspost–civilrightssubjects,thecharacters
Iexaminereceivesomeofthishistory,butboththenewmillenniummu-
lattaandtheexceptionalmultiracialfiguresresist,todifferentextents,the
wholesalemarkingoftheirbodiesasillicitandillegal.Atthesametime,
mixed-raceAfricanAmericansbearthemarksofacertaindegreeofpres-
tigebecausetheyhavehistoricallyembodiedthebeautystandardwithin
AfricanAmericancommunities.ThefiguresIexaminearerepresentedas
battlingwiththeforcesofbothprestigeandostracism.Sometimestheir
perceived mixed-race desirability grants privileges and sometimes this
privilegepreventsthemfromunderstandingthemselvesoutsideofsexual
relationships.Thecharacters’explicitracialbordercrossingdemonstrates
howracializationisindeedquitemalleable:inanumberofcasesthechar-
actersarepresentedastryingondifferentracialandsexualpersonaeby
alteringhair,speech,partners,andmannerofdress.139
Suchidentityplayillustratesthatideologiesarenotabsolute;theyare
notsuturedshut.IstrivetowriteintheslippagesinTranscending Black-
ness.Forthenewmillenniummulatta,andtoacertainextentfortheex-
ceptionalmultiracial,theproblemofperforming“authentic”raceissolely
thepurviewofthemixed-raceAfricanAmericancharacter:withinagiven
text,themixed-racecharacteristheonlyonequestioningracialalliances
orattemptingtoperformauthenticracializedidentities.Questionsofau-
thenticityarethusattheforefrontofthisbook.ThetextsIexaminearenot
Introduction
—
34
notes
––
—
ThisprefaceisanextendedversionofthekeynoteaddressIgaveattheMultiracial
HeritageWeekatBrownUniversityin2009.Fiveyearsearlier,asagraduatestudent
finishingupmydissertation,Ihadalsogiventhekeynote,aspeechwhereIflexedmy
almost-Ph.D.muscles.Mytalkin2004waspurelyacademic,asI“impartially”thought
throughwhatitmeanttoassertamultiracialidentityintheshadowofthe2000U.S.
Census,particularlywithregardstothecontentioushistoryofnamingandclaiming
mixed-race.ButforthefifteenthanniversaryofMultiracialHeritageWeekIfeltcom-
fortable,evencompelled,torevealmyownmultiracialjourney.Thiswasnosmallfeat
forme.AlthoughIhadnotletthedismissalofscholarshiponmixed-raceas“sellout
work”(bysomeacademicsfrommyowngraduatefieldofethnicstudies,ortheaccusa-
tionofitas“me-study”byanti–ethnicstudies,anti–feministstudies,andanti–critical
studiesscholars)scaremeawayfromwritingaboutthetopic,Ihadonlywantedtoen-
gageinthescholarlyandpolitical,andnotthepersonalandemotional,implications
ofmywork.AsIpreparedformytalkin2009,withfouryearsasanassistantprofes-
sorundermybelt,Irealizedthatmypreviousrefusaltotalkpersonallywasnotjusta
desirenottobeself-indulgent,asIhadtoldmyselfpreviously.Rather,mysilenceoper-
atedasawaytoextricatemyselffromtheidentity-politicsfirethatsurroundsworkon
mixed-race,justlikeworkonotherso-calledinauthenticracialized,gendered,sexu-
alized,orclassedexperiences.Inthispersonalandemotionalopeningprologuetomy
scholarly,politicalbookonmixed-race,Irevisitthoseideas.Thisprefaceisinspiredby
theworksofMarkAnthonyNeal,especiallyNew Black Man.Neal’sworkgavemeper-
missiontotakethevoiceIdohere(MarkAnthonyNeal,New Black Man).
1.Hall,“MinimalSelves,”116.
2.IamgratefultoMikeHurt,oneofthefoundersofBomBsandmypeermentor,
forkeepingthesedocumentsforalloftheseyearsandsharingthemwithme.
3.Spickard,“ObamaNation?”
4.SachiisnowaprofessionaldocumentarianworkingfortheLos Angeles Times.She
continuestomakepiecesaboutmultiraciality,amongmanyothertopics.
5.MariaRoot,“BillofRightsforPeopleofMixedHeritage,”1993–1994,http://www
.drmariaroot.com/doc/BillOfRights.pdf(accessedDecember10,2008).
6.Hall,“CulturalIdentityandDiaspora.”
7.SeeWilliams,Mark One or More,12.
8.Ibid.
1.S.Brown,“NegroCharacterasSeenbyWhiteAuthors,”280.
2.Anumberofauthorsarebeginningtowriteaboutthemetaphorofracetranscen-
dence(althoughIhaveyettosee“black”combinedwith“transcend”).See,for
example,V.Smith,“From‘Race’toRaceTranscendence”;Mirza,“Transcendence
overDiversity”;Post,“CulturalInversionandtheOne-DropRule.”
3.V.Smith,Not Just Race, Not Just Gender,38.
4.Hall,“TheWorkofRepresentation,”15.
5.Hall,“WhatIsThis‘Black’inBlackPopularCulture?,”474.
6.Hammonds,“NewTechnologiesofRace,”108.
7.Hall,“TheWorkofRepresentation,”1.
8.OmiandWinant,Racial Formation in the United States,68.
9.Through culture the hybrid nature of identity, described by James Clifford, is
“mixed, relational, and inventive” (Clifford, The Predicament of Culture, 10). In
addition,throughexaminingawidevarietyofnontraditional“hiddenhistoriesof
resistance,”RobinKelleygetsus“topayattentiontoculturalhybridity”(Kelley,
Race Rebels,15and13).TriciaRosewritesaboutthesyncreticnatureofhip-hop
culture“asanexperimentalandcollectivespacewherecontemporaryissuesand
ancestralforcesareworkedthroughsimultaneously”(Rose,Black Noise,59).
10.Almaguer,Racial Fault Lines,3.
11.My “new millennium mulatta” is a play off of Danzy Senna’s brilliant phrase
(Senna,“TheMulattoMillennium,”12).
12.KawaibuildsofftheworkofHomiBhabhaandStuartHallhere.Kawai,“Stereo-
typingAsianAmericans,”118.
13.Crenshaw,“MappingtheMargins.”
14.Beech,“EurasianInvasion.”
15.SeeNagle,American Indian Ethnic Renewal.Thisideabecomesimportantwhen
consideringanothersetofstatistics:thismillenniumismarkedbymoreinter-
raciallymarriedAfricanAmericansintheUnitedStatesthaneverbefore:9per-
centofblackmenand4percentofblackwomen.Thisnumberislowwhencom-
paredtotheintermarriageratesofallothergroupsofcolor,butrelativelyhigh
whencomparedtothe3to4percentinterracialmarriagerateforbothsexesof
“non-Hispanicwhites.”Toputthisanotherway,fromthe2000U.S.Censusnum-
bers,96.5percentofallwhiteAmericansaremarriedtootherwhiteAmericans
(U.S.BureauoftheCensus,“HispanicRaceandOriginofCoupledHouseholds,”
Census2000,http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs/phc-t19/
index.html).Anotherstudyfrom2003showsthatthenumberofinterracialmar-
riagesofallgroupsisevenhigherthanthecensusdata,withwhitesintermarrying
atarateof5.8percent,AfricanAmericansat10.2percent,AsianAmericansat
27.2percent,Latinosat28.4percent(BeanandStevens,“InterracialMarriageby
RacialGroupandRaceofPartner”;alsocitedinDaCosta,Making Multiracials,9).
Notes to Introduction
—
174
16.DaCosta,Making Multiracials,4;andIbrahim,“TowardBlackandMultiracial‘Kin-
ship’after1997,”23.
17.Oneadditionalnoteonyears:Iusethephrase“newmillennium”throughoutthe
book,eventhoughIstartmystudyin1998.RepresentationsofmultiracialAfrican
Americansinthelate1990sname“newmillennium”phenomenaevenbeforethe
adventofthenewmillennium.
18.Iusethephrase“anti-blackracism”asopposedto“racism”or“prejudice”notjust
tosignaldiscriminatoryfeelingsofwhitestowardpeopleofcolor,buttoalsosig-
nifytheinstitutional,structural,andculturalforcesthatfomenttheinequalityof
peopleofAfricandescentinoursociety.
19.SusanSaulny,“Black?White?Asian?”
20.SeeBerlin,Slaves without Masters;andBlassingame,Black New Orleans.
21.See Streeter, “The Hazards of Visibility”; and Foreman, “Who’s Your Mama?”
Foremannotes,“theterm[mulatta]seemstobeenjoyingavernacularandcriti-
calcurrencythat,Ifear,bothexpressesacurrentracialanxietyandreproduces
thepoliticsofexceptionalism.Today,peopleasktheirpeersandprofessors,clients
andcustomers,‘areyouamulatto?’withlittlesenseofmeaningormanners,while
publishersclamorfornovels,autobiographies,andanthologiesaboutlivingonthe
colorline”(531).
22.AlexLeoandNicoPitney,“WandaSykesKillsatHouseCorrespondents’Dinner
(Video),”Huffington Post,May5,2009,http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/
09/wanda-sykes-video-of-whit_n_201280.html(seeminute1:40to2:15).Sykes
alsoperformedacloselyrelatedversionofthisjokeinhercomedyshow“I’maBe
Me,”whichairedOctober10,2009,onhBo.
23.Parker, Sawyer, Towler, “A Black Man in the White House?, 193–217. See also
KinderandDale-Riddle,The End of Race;andTeslerandSears,Obama’s Race.
24.TeslerandSears,Obama’s Race,4.
25.Wyatt,“WandaSykesHasaShow(orSoTheyTellHer),”C1.
26.Will and Grace,“BackUp,Dancer,”episodeno.142,firstbroadcastSeptember26,
2004, by nBC, directed by James Burrows and written by David Kohan, Max
Mutchnick,TracyPoust,andJonKinnally;Scrubs,“MyCommonEnemy,”episode
no.75,firstbroadcastOctober19,2004,bynBC,directedbyJoannaKernsand
writtenbyBillLawrenceandBillCallahan.Ihavebeensurprisedthatthetermis
alsousedasaso-calledneutraldescriptor,sinceitshistorymakesitverbotenfor
metouseneutrally.IhaveveryrarelyhearditusedbymultiracialAfricanAmeri-
cansinareclaimingmanner;whenused,asbySykes,ithasanironicorcomedic
tinge.However,Ihavecomeacrossasurprisingnumberofnon-mixed-raceAfri-
canAmericanswhouse“mulatto”asaracelabel,fromundergraduatestudents
andseniorcitizenlearnerstotheAsianAmericannovelistDonLee’scasualrefer-
encetohisblack-whitefemalecharacterinCountry of Origin(2004)as“amulatto.”
27.Andyet,“hapa”isnottotallynoncontentious.SeeKauanui,Hawaiian Blood;and
Nishime,“GuiltyPleasures.”
28.ParkerandSong,Rethinking Mixed Race.
29.OmiandWinant,Racial Formation in the United States.
Notes to Introduction
—
175
30.Bobo,Black Women as Cultural Readers,35.
31.Hodes,White Women, Black Men.
32.Frankenberg,White Women, Race Matters,71–74.Formoredetailedinformationon
antimiscegenationlaws,seeRachelF.Moran’sInterracial Intimacy.
33.Gossett,Race,30–31.
34.Genovese,Roll, Jordan, Roll,461.
35.Winters,“MoreDesultoryandUnconnectedThanAnyOther,”469.
36.Frankenberg,White Women, Race Matters,73.
37.Collins,Black Feminist Thought,50–51.
38.White,Aren’t I a Woman?,29.
39.Genovese,Roll, Jordan, Roll,416.
40.Ibid.,430.
41.E.White,Dark Continent of Our Bodies,33.
42.Davis,Who Is Black?,37.
43.Additionally,thehistoryofmixed-racepeopleinslaveryhasbeendescribedasan
attempteddissociationwithblacknessandassociationwithwhiteness.Whilehis-
torianssuchasJoelWilliamsonandJohnMenckearguethattherewasaseparate
mulattoclassduringslavery,Genoveseassertsthat“mulattoesdidnotconstitutea
separatecasteintheOldSouthexceptamongthewell-to-dofreeNegroesofafew
cities.BlacksandmulattoesworkedsidebysideintheplantationBigHouseand
inthefields.Thosemulattoeswhoreceivedspecialtreatmentusuallywerekinto
theirwhitefolks,andthespecialtreatmentwasnotalwaysfavorable”(Genovese,
Roll, Jordan, Roll,429).Nevertheless,asGenoveseillustratesinhisdiscussionof
“fancygirls,”distinctionsbetweengradationsofmixed-raceblackswerealsoar-
ticulatedontheauctionblock.Atthesametime,itwasalsosometimesfinan-
ciallybeneficialtoignoretheissueofmixture.Writingaboutearlydescriptionsof
“mulattosasblack,”WinthropJordanassertsthat“byclassifyingthemulattoasa
Negro[aslaveauctioneer]wasineffectdenyingthatintermixturehadoccurred
atall”(W.Jordan,White over Black,178).Formoreonthistopic,seeWilliamson,
New People;andMencke,Mulattoes and Race Mixture.Therehasalsobeendebate
amongscholars ofAfrican American historyastowhether mixed-race African
Americanswerepartofatwo-prongblack-whitesystem(wheretheirallegiances
solelylaywiththeblackcommunity),orathree-prong“mulattoelite”systemlike
thatoftheCaribbean.
44.ThismythworksitselfoutinthelegalarenaofState v. Scott(1869)wherethe
mixed-racepersonisdescribedas“sicklyandeffeminate,”“inferiorinphysical
developmentandstrength,”andfinally,“productiveofevil,andevilonly,without
anycorrespondinggood”(Saks,“RepresentingMiscegenationLaw”).
45.Gossett,Race,49,61.
46.Mencke,Mulattoes and Race Mixture,9.
47.Ibid.,39.
48.Inaninterestingcomparison,showingthatinterracialsexwasascapegoatissuein
anti-immigrationandantimiscegenationlaws,TomásAlmaguernotesthatAnglo
justificationforanti-ChineseimmigrationwasthelasciviousnatureoftheChi-
nese,orthat“likeChinesewomen,Chinesemenalsowereperceivedasathreat
Notes to Introduction
—
176
to the moral well-being of the white population, and most especially to white
women”(Almaguer,Racial Fault Lines,160).Theloomingmenaceofracemixing
andmixed-racebodiessparkedwhitefear,haltedChineseimmigration,andpre-
ventedChinesecompetitionwithwhiteworkers;inessence,imagesofmixed-
racehelpedconsolidatewhiteprivilege.Examininganti-immigrationlawsalong-
sideanti-miscegenationlaws,itbecomesclearthattheU.S.governmentdesired
Chinesebodiessolelyforlabor,andthenhopedtheywoulddisappear.Fearof
miscegenationandmultiracialbodiesprovidedarationaleforracistlegislation.
InAmericanhistory,forpeopleofcolorandinterracialfamilies,theostensibly
privatespaceofthefamilyhasbeentornviolentlyopentomaketheirintimacies
public.Itisinterestingtonotethatwhitehysteriafocusedmuchmoreintensely
aroundAsianimmigrationandracemixingandnotnearlyasmucharoundactual
mixed-raceAsianandwhitechildren.Iamhardpressedtoevenfindnamesfor
suchchildrenatthattimeas“hapa”isaHawaiianimportand“Eurasian”comes
fromU.S.militaryinterventioninAsiancountries.Incontrast,muchofthefocus
ofwhitehysteriaaboutblackandwhiteintermixturewasindeedaboutthefor-
mationofmixed-racebodies.Therehavebeenveryprecisetermsdocumenting
mixed-raceblackandwhitechildrenfrom“mulatto”to“quadroon,”“octoroon,”
andsoon.
49.QuotedinWhite,Dark Continent of Our Bodies: Black Feminism and the Politics of
Respectability,33.
50.Mencke,Mulattoes and Race Mixture,77.
51.Davis,Who Is Black?: One Nation’s Definition,29.
52.Moran,Interracial Intimacy,54.
53.Indeed,throughsomeestimations,evengreaterwhitefearcomesfrominvisible
infiltrationfrom“black”bodiesas,forexample,St.ClairDrakeandHoraceCayton
thoroughlydocumentedGreatDepression–erawhitefearinChicagoof“black”
people“passing”as“white”(DrakeandCayton,Black Metropolis,159–73).
54.Grossman,“AChancetoMakeGood,”361.
55.Moran,InterracialIntimacy,54.
56.Engagingthescienceofhistime,inThe Health and Physique of the Negro American
(1906)DuBoisargues,“Allthegreatpeoplesoftheworldaretheresultofamix-
tureofraces”(37).SeealsoSquires,African Americans and the Media.
57.DuBois,The Health and Physique of the Negro American,16.
58.Bost,Mulattas and Mestizas,68.Inaddition,whileanundergraduateatStanford
University,DanzySennawroteherhonorsthesis“HidingintheLight:Represen-
tationsof‘Passing’inAfrican-AmericanFiction,1890to1930”(Arias,“AnInter-
viewwithDanzySenna”).
59.Locke,“AmericanLiteraryTraditionandtheNegro,”271.
60.Grossman,“AChancetoMakeGood,”357.
61.In“TheReactionoftheNegrototheMotionPictureBirth of a Nation,”ThomasR.
CrippsdescribesThomasDixonas“asometimespreacher,aprofessionalSouth-
erner,andafretfulNegrophobe”(111)wholovedtolaunchdiatribesagainstthe
dangersofmiscegenation.
62.Gish,“TheMakingofThe Birth of a Nation,”44.
Notes to Introduction
—
177
63.WhileBrodyexplainshowtheUnitedKingdomanditscitizenswerenever“pure,”
but rather a compilation of various peoples and cultures, performances of hy-
bridityhelpconstructitsveryoppositestate,amythicalpurity.Inotherwords,
performancesofhybriditysomehowmaketheEnglish“purely”white(Brody,Im-
possible Purities).
64.Bernardi,The Birth of Whiteness,20.
65.Mencke,Mulattoes and Race Mixture,122.
66.Ibid.,125.
67.Reuter,The Mulatto in the United States,88.
68.Usinghistoryandsociologyanddrawingheavilyuponcensusdata,Reuterarticu-
latesapseudo-scientific“narrativeoftragedy”:“[mulattoes]envythewhite,aspire
toequalitywiththem,andareembitteredwhentherealizationofsuchambitionis
deniedthem.Theyareadissatisfiedandanunhappygroup”(Reuter,The Mulatto
in the United States,88).
69.Thisincludesthe“Eurasians/Anglo-IndiansofIndia,”the“CapeColouredofSouth
Africa,”the“ColouredPeoplesofJamaica,”the“Indo-EuropeansofJava,”the“Part
Hawaiians,”andthe“MetisofBrazil.”
70.Stonequist,The Marginal Man,145–55.
71.Somecontemporarytextsalsocombinestaid,early-twentieth-centurynotionsof
marginalitywithcontemporaryideasofmultiracial“specialness.”Forexample,in
From Black to Biracial(1998),thesociologistKathleenKorgenarguesthatmixed-
race people must make a lateral move from one singular identity to the next,
choosing,inherview,oneessentiallydefinedethnicity,“biracial,”overanother,
“black,”toaidintheproblemthat“biracialpersonslackasenseofbelonging.”
Korgenalsopropagates“positive”stereotypesasshedescribesamultiracialAfri-
canAmerican“giftofobjectivity”and“cosmopolitan”worldview.Korgenillus-
tratesthepersistenceofReuter’sandStonequist’sideasinourageoflatemulti-
culturalism,whereidentitiesarenothistoricallysituatedbutimaginedtobetried
onandofflikeoutfits.Korgen,From Black to Biracial,76–77.
72.In“‘What’stheMatterwithSarahJane?,’”MarinaHeungstatesthatthisfilmwas
“oneofUniversal’shighestgrossingfilmsinhistory”(303).MulveyandHalliday,
Douglas Sirk,109.
73.Berlant,“NationalBrands/NationalBody,”197.
74.Ibid.
75.Butler,“Lana’s‘Imitation,’”15.
76.Williams,Playing the Race Card,181.
77.Stern,“Imitation of Life,”284.
78.DrakeandCayton,Black Metropolis,173.
79.SeeSaks,“RepresentingMiscegenationLaw”;andPascoe,“Race,Gender,andthe
PrivilegesofProperty.”
80.Harris,“WhitenessasProperty,”279;Lipsitz,The Possessive Investment in White-
ness.
81.SeeMoran,Interracial Intimacy;andKennedy,Interracial Intimacies.
82.Moran,Interracial Intimacy,6–7,12–13.
83.P.GabrielleForemannotesthatanumberofcriticshaveobservedsimilarphe-
Notes to Introduction
—
178
nomena“thatthewhiteskinofsomeslavesactedasavisiblyclearsymbolofthe
wrongsofslaveryargument”(“Who’sYourMama?,”522).
84.Talty,Mulatto America at the Crossroads of Black and White Culture,3–6.
85.Ibid.,6.
86.Bullock,“TheMulattoinAmericanFiction.”
87.Zanger,“The‘TragicOctoroon’inPre-CivilWarFiction.”
88.Inaddition,justlikethetragicmulatta,thetragicoctoroonplayspoliticalpur-
poses: this character “flattered the Northern audience in its sense of self-
righteousness,confirmingitsbeliefinthemoralinferiorityoftheSouth”(ibid.,
287).
89.Cooper,“TheNegroasPresentedinAmericanLiterature,”150.
90.Hall,“NewEthnicities,”166.
91.Tucker,“LovingDayRecallsaTimeWhentheUnionofaManandaWomanWas
Banned.”
92.Mixed-race,however,wasnotthefocusofattentionintheUnitedStatesduring
theyearsofthecivilrightsmovement,which,inManningMarable’sphrase,was
the“SecondReconstruction,”thetimeperiodfrom1945to1976whentherewere
“aseriesofmassiveconfrontationsconcerningthestatusoftheAfrican-American
andothernationalminorities...inthenation’seconomic,socialandpolitical
institutions”(Marable,Race, Reform, and Rebellion,3–4).
93.Squires,Dispatches from the Color Line,29,53.
94.Whatmixed-racealsoowestocivilrightsisatypeofmythologyofraceandracial
equality.NikhilPalSinghdescribeshow,inthecreationofthemythologyofthe
civilrightsera,Dr.MartinLutherKingJr.hasbecomeaparticularlycentralfigure.
King“hascometostandfortheideaofanAmericainwhichracialequalityhas
alreadybeenachieved”(Singh,Black Is a Country,5).SingharguesthatKinghas
been successfully appropriated as “a figure affirming the accomplishments of
color-blindnationalism”(17).ThemythofcivilrightsintheUnitedStateshas
beenrecastasautopianmeritocracywhereracialinjusticewasquicklyputtoan
endinthecivilrightsmovement.ThisiswhatSinghcalls“reshapingthebound-
ariesofnation,”which“hasalsoinvolvedrearticulationsofrace”(21).Inthepost–
civilrightsera,thereshapingofracializationbytheUnitedStateshascomeabout
throughneoconservativecelebrationsofmixed-race.
95.Williamson,New People,195.
96.Omi,“RacializationinthePost–CivilRightsEra,”179.
97.Brunsma,Mixed Messages,2–3(emphasisintheoriginal).AlongwithRoot’sfirst
anthology,IwouldincludePaulSpickard’sMixed Blood,MariaRoot’sThe Multi-
racial Experience,LiseFunderburg’sBlack, White, Other,andNaomiZack’sAmeri-
can Mixed Race.
98.The multiracial movement denies the existence of racialization in its myopic
desiretocreateareifiedmultiracialcategory.Insteadofembracingliminality,syn-
cretism,andhybridity,theMultiracialMovementseizesholdofitsnew“racial”
category, denying the reality of multiple allegiances and seemingly contradic-
toryidentifications.In“ACritiqueof‘OurConstitutionIsColor-Blind,’”thelegal
scholarNeilGotandaarguesthat“racialcategoriesthemselves,withtheirmeta-
Notes to Introduction
—
179
phoricalthemesofwhiteracialpurityandnonwhitecontamination,havediffer-
entmeaningsforblacks[orallpeopleofcolor]andwhites”(267–68).Thus,the
MultiracialMovement’sdesiring“multiracial”asyetanothercategorylinkstothe
samehistorythatreifieswhitepowerandseesraceasadistinct,biologicalreality.
Inaddition,Gotandastatesthatnotgroundingdecisionsaboutracialcategoriza-
tioninthehistoryofU.S.racism“supportsracialsubordination...bytreating
racialcategoriesasiftheywerestableandimmutable”(259).Multiracialactiv-
ists’desireforthe“multiracial”categorydemonstrateshowtheyseea“solution”
tothe“problem”ofmixed-raceasinclusionintothepoliticalmarketplace.They
thusseektomimicthehegemonicstructuresofmonoracialityandcannotthink
outsidethemonoracialbox.
99.Somerville,Queering the Color Line,167.
100.K.Williams,Mark One or More.
101.Ibid.
102.TheCampaignforColorBlindAmericaLegalDefenseandEducationalFounda-
tion’s website was www.equalrights.com; there they described themselves as a
“not-for-profitorganizationdesignedtochallengerace-basedpublicpoliciesand
educatethepublicabouttheinjusticesofracialpreferences.”TheAmericanCivil
RightsCoalition’swebsiteishttp://www.acrc1.0rg/index.htm;there,aboveabig
pictureofWardConnerlydeepinwork,theorganizationstatesthatit“workswith
grassrootssupportersandleadersonthelocal,stateandfederalleveltoendracial
andgenderpreferencesandclassifications.”
103.CritiquingthisphenomenonintheanthologyMapping Multiculturalism,thecon-
tributorsstrugglewiththemultiplemeaningsof“multiculturalism,”includingits
conservativeincarnationsasanideologythat“reneweddemandsforassimilation
indisguise,”“avoidedrace...andlefttheimpressionthatanydiscussionofcul-
turaldiversitywouldrenderracisminsignificant,”and“oftenplayedintotheview
thatbecamebacklashorthodoxy”(GordonandNewfield,“Introduction,”1,3,4).
104.Bonilla-Silva,Racism without Racists,2.
105.Squires,Dispatches from the Color Line,2.
106.In addition to white authors such as Hollinger and George Will, men of color
suchasWardConnerly,DineshD’Souza,andRichardRodriguezalsoarticulatea
post-ethnicpointofview.Theseneoconservativemenofcolorusethemselvesas
“authentic”rolemodelswhocantestifytotheexistenceofcolorblindness.See
DineshD’Souza’sThe End of Racism;RichardRodriguez’sBrown,Days of Obliga-
tion,andHunger of Memory;andGeorgeWill’ssyndicatednewspapercolumn.
107.Squires,Dispatches from the Color Line,2.
108.Forsomeneoconservatives,adesirefortheerasureofthecolorline,ortheblur-
ringofracialdistinctions,resultsinanimaginedcolor-blindstateofpost-ethnicity
asdescribedbythehistorianDavidHollingerinPostethnic America.Proponents
ofapost-ethnicideology,whocanbebothconservativesandliberals,statethat
twenty-first-centuryAmericanolongerneedstoholdontoissuesofracesince
racism nolonger plays asubstantial rolein“our”lives. Post-race alsosignifies
post–civilrights,orthatthegoalsofthecivilrightsmovementhavebeenfully
met;post-racefunctionsasanantidotetorace-basedprogramssuchasaffirma-
Notes to Introduction
—
180
tiveaction.Failingtoacknowledgetheexistenceofcontinuallyraciallystratified
inequalities,Hollingerwrites,“apost-ethnicperspectiveseekstotestmoresys-
tematicallythelimitsoftheepistemic‘we’andtostretchitscircleaswidelyas
thecapacitiesofnatureanditsknowerswillallow”(111).Whileutopiansounding
inpremise,theapplicationof“voluntaryidentity,”touseaHollingerphrase,is
farfromracialutopiaproducing(129).Whileapost-ethnicAmericastrikesmany
asnearlyutopianintheabstract,therealityisthatmerelyremoving“theethno-
racialcomponentinidentity,”perhapsanimpossiblenotioninitself,failstoelimi-
nateracismoneitherapersonalorstructurallevelintheraciallyhierarchized
UnitedStatesandperhapsevenstokesinstitutionalracism.
109.Frankenberg,White Women, Race Matters,14,143.
110.Lévi-Strauss,Introduction to Marcel Mauss,63–64;andRace: The Floating Signifier,
producedanddirectedbySutJhally(Northhampton,MA:MediaEducationFoun-
dation,1996),videocassette,62minutes.
111.However,asthecommunicationscholarsKentOnoandDerekBuescherillustrate
intheirdiscussionofhowDisney’sPocahontasfunctionsasacipher,thecipher
figureisnotmerely“anemptyshellofmeaningpriortobeingimportedintomain-
streamU.S.commodityculture”(OnoandBuescher,“DecipheringPocahontas,”
25).
112.Elsewhere I have noted: “A wide array of scholars have interrogated post-race
usingavarietyofrelatedterms,including‘colorblindness,’usedbylegalscholars
suchasLaniGuinierandGeraldTorres(2002),‘colorblindracism,’utilizedby
sociologistEduardoBonilla-Silva(2003),‘colormute,’coinedbyanthropologist
MicaPollock(2005),‘racialapathy,’deployedbysociologistsTyroneFormanand
AmandaLewis(2006),and‘post–civilrights,’appliedbyjournalists,critics,and
academicsalike.Oneofthemorestridentembracesofpost-racecomesfromPaul
Gilroy(2000),whochallengesthe‘crisisofraciology,’claimingthatholdingonto
‘racethinking,’even,orperhapsespecially,byanti-racistactivistsandcriticalrace
scholars,fosters‘speciousontologies’and‘lazyessentialisms’(Gilroy53).These
aretermschosenbyauthorstodenoteorcritiquesomemomentaftertheimpor-
tanceofrace.Ifavortheterm‘post-race’becauseithighlightsthecontinuedcen-
tralityofraceinthisideologywhereraceisostensiblyimmaterial.Icontendthat
initsverydenialoftheusesofrace,post-racialityremainsembroiledinprecisely
whatitclaimsnottobe.Inotherwords,‘post-raceisanideologythatcannotes-
caperacialization,completewithcontrollingimagesorracializedstereotypes”
(R.Joseph,“TyraBanksIsFat,”239–40).
113.ElsewhereIhavenoted:“MediastudiesscholarsfromAngelaMcRobbie(2004,
2008)toSarahBanet-Weiser(1999,2007),SusanDouglasandMeredithMichaels
(2004),CharlotteBrunsdon(2005),andYvonneTaskerandDianeNegra(2007)
areproducingcritiquesofpost-feminism,whichisalsopopularlyknownasgirl-
powerfeminismandanti-feminism.Whilescholarshipcritiquingpost-feminism
oftenmakestheefforttomentionrace,noting,forexample,thatpost-feminist
scholarshiplargelyfocusesonwhitewomen—therehasbeenlessattentionpaid
towomenofcolorandfewersustainedcritiquesofpost-raceandpost-feminism
intandem....WhileIamfocusinghereontheparallelsbetweenthetwoide-
Notes to Introduction
—
181
ologiesofpost-feminismandpost-race,Iwanttobeclearthattherearealsoa
numberofdifferencesbetweenthesetwopost-ideologies.Oneofthebiggestdif-
ferencesisthatsimilaritiesaboundbetweenthepower-evasiveideasofpost-race
andpost-feminism,notpost-raceandpost-gender,oraButlerian-inspiredeffort
todeconstructgenderroles,behaviors,performances,andideals(Butler,1990,
1993)”(R.Joseph,“TyraBanksIsFat,240).(SeeMcRobbie,“Postfeminismand
PopularCulture,”andThe Uses of Cultural Studies;Banet-Weiser,The Most Beautiful
Girl in the World,andKids Rule!;DouglasandMichaels,The Mommy Myth;Bruns-
don,“Feminism,Postfeminism,Martha,Martha,andNigella”;NegraandTasker,
Interrogating Postfeminism.)
114.Koshy,“RaceintheFuturePerfectTense.”
115.Waters,Ethnic Options,147.
116.Balibar,“IsTherea‘Neo-Racism?,’”21,17.
117.Douglas,“ManufacturingPostfeminism.”
118.SeeCamillePaglia’sSexual Personae;KatieRoiphe’sThe Morning After;andNaomi
Wolf’sFire with FireandPromiscuities.
119.Wolf,Fire with Fire,xvii.
120.Douglas,“ManufacturingPostfeminism.”
121.Bellafante,“Feminism,”54,55.
122.Ihaveheardthisphraseinnumerouspopularandacademicsettings,including
Root,“TheBiracialBabyBoom.”
123.Withthenewwayofcountingmultiplyracedindividuals,the2000U.S.Census
revealedthatnationwide2.4percentofthepopulationidentifywithtwoormore
races(U.S.BureauoftheCensus,“ProfileofGeneralDemographicCharacteris-
tics:2000,GeographicArea:UnitedStates,”Census2000,http://censtats.census
.gov/data/US/01000.pdf).ThesenumberswerehigherontheWestCoast,total-
ing4.7percentinCalifornia;inaddition,in2000,17percentofbirthsinCali-
forniaweretointerracialcouples(U.S.BureauoftheCensus.“ProfileofGeneral
DemographicCharacteristics:2000,GeographicArea:California,”Census2000,
http://censtats.census.gov/data/CA/04006.pdf).AlmostsevenmillionAmericans
self-identifiedwithmultiplegroups,thusearningthelabelof“mixed-race.”Toput
thisnumberinperspective,whilethebirthsofmultiracialbabiesintheUnited
Statesincreased260percentsincethe1970s,thebirthsofmonoracialbabieshave
increased15percent(Wardel,“HelpingMultiracialandMultiethnicChildrenEs-
capeNoMan’sLand”).
124.Morning,“MultiracialClassificationontheUnitedStatesCensus.”
125.DuBois,The Souls of Black Folk,359.
126.PerlmannandWaters,The New Race Question,16–17.
127.SeeGlazer,“ReflectionsonRace,Hispanicity,andAncestryintheU.S.Census.”
128.KimberlyWilliams,“BoxedIn:TheUnitedStatesMultiracialMovement,”jobtalk,
UniversityofCalifornia,SanDiego,January14,2000.
129.Brody,Impossible Purities.
130.NationalUrbanLeague,“AfricanAmericans’StatusIs73%ofWhitesSaysNew
‘StateofBlackAmerica’2004Report,”March24,2004.
Notes to Introduction
—
182
131.Ellis, “The New Black Aesthetic,” 234. Similarly, Asian Americans’ interstitial
racializationhaslongbeennotedbyscholarssuchasFrankWuandYenLeEs-
piritu.
132.TheseincludetheCBssitcomThe Jeffersons,whereBelindaTolbertplayedJenny-
WillisJefferson(insixty-eightepisodesfrom1975to1985);thenBCCosby Show
spinoff, A Different World, in which Cree Summers played Freddie Brooks (in
eighty-sevenepisodesfrom1988to1993;theshowairedfrom1987to1993);the
wBandthenCwnetworks’Girlfriends,whichfeaturedthesupportingactressPer-
siaWhiteasLynnSearcyfrom2000to2007;andtheShowtimedramaQueer as
FolkinwhichMakylaSmithplayedDaphneChanders(inthirty-threeepisodes,
whichairedfrom2000to2005).Intherealmofhistoricalminiseries,theCBs
miniseriesQueenstarredHalleBerry(1993),andtheShowtimeminiseriesFeast
of All Saints(2001)featuredahostofmultiracialcharacters,includingNicoleLynn
asMarieSte.Marie,JenniferBealsasDollyRose,RachelLuttrellasLissette,and
JasmineGuyasJulieteMercer.Charactersexplicitlywrittenasmixed-raceAfrican
Americanmenarehardertospotintelevision.TheyincludeGiancarloEspositoin
thenBCdramaHomicide: Life on the StreetasMikeGiardello(intwenty-twoepi-
sodesfrom1998–1999;theshowairedfrom1993to1999)andErnestWaddellin
theCwteendramaOne Tree HillasDerekSommers(infourepisodesin2006;the
showfirstairedin2003andisstillrunning).
133.Caseyetal.,Television Studies,vii.
134.Miller, Cultural Citizenship, 12. Television studies is a methodologically diverse
fieldthat,HoraceNewcombnotes,drawsuponAmerican“literarystudiesthat
redirected critical analysis toward the study of popular entertainment forms.”
SuchcriticalanalysisincludestheBirminghamSchool,theFrankfurtSchool,film
studies,andfeministcriticism(Newcomb,“TelevisionandthePresentClimate
ofCriticism,”2).Thegroundbreakingworkinblacktelevisionstudiesofscholars
suchasHermanGray,KrystalBrentZook,RobinMeans-Coleman,andBeretta
Smith-Shomadebringstotheforethemannerinwhichpublicsymbolismfunc-
tionswithregardtoAfricanAmericanbodiesontelevision.
135.Robinson,“ItTakesOnetoKnowOne,”719.
136.duCille,The Coupling Convention,7–8.
137.Hall,“MinimalSelves,”114.
138.Hall,“SubjectsinHistory,”292.
139.In“Mixed-RaceWomen,”MariaRootdescribesthisphenomenonasmixed-race
womenhaving“flexiblelooks”(163).
1.Odenwald,“GirlsonFilm”;J.Thomas,“Women’sWork.”
2.Dunn,“Baad Bitches” and Sassy Supermamas;SeetheentriesontheInternetMovie
Databasewebsite(www.imdb.com)forJenniferBealsandPamGrier.
3.SeetheentriesontheInternetMovieDatabasewebsite(www.imdb.com)forThe
Bride,Vampire’s Kiss,Troubled Waters,The Book of Eli,Devil in a Blue Dress,A House
Divided,andFeast of All Saints.