Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr Paul Spencer
Researcher Development Manager
Paul.spencer@uwe.ac.uk
Tel: 0117 328 3974
The Process
This workshop
Timescales
Appointment of Examiners
What your DoS should be doing
The forms
The Examination
What exactly is an MPhil or PhD?
How is it examined?
How to prepare for the examination
is it feasible to prepare at all?
What to expect in the viva questions and concerns
appointment of examiners
Process (2)
Examiners must be approved by the Faculty Research
Degrees Committee (RDC) & submitted to Graduate
School (PGR Assessment) at least three months before
the expected date of the viva
You submit your thesis for examination to UWE
Graduate School PGR Assessment team (located in the
Graduate School Office, room 3E37)
6 3
mths
Submit minor
corrections
(FT PT 6wks)
Preliminary
reports from
Examiners
mths
wks
Viva
wks
Submit minor
amendments
(FT PT 18
wks)
mths
mths
Submit major
Corrections (FT
PT 9mths)
What is an MPhil?
(1)
(2)
(3)
(6)
What is a PhD?
(i)
(ii)
(vi)
MPhil Vs PhD?
The Examination
The examination shall have two stages..
firstly: the candidates submission of the
thesis and examiners independent
preliminary assessment of it;
&
secondly: the defence of the thesis by the
candidate
made, or
too modest to state the significance of the
contribution
Outcomes of Viva
Possible Outcomes
The candidate fulfils the criteria for the award on which they
are registered:
i. Without further correction or amendment;
ii. Subject to correction of presentational / typographical errors
within the material
iii. Subject to minor amendment of the material
iv. Subject to major amendment. The material submitted
displays some deficiencies of content, analysis and / or
presentation in areas specified by the examiners. No
re-examination is required, amendments to be approved by all
examiners.
Possible Outcomes
The candidate does not currently fulfil the criteria for the
award on which they are registered: Referred for
resubmission and re-examination
The candidate is permitted to revise and re-submit the material
for the degree and be re-examined on one further occasion
with or without viva. Revisions indicated by examiners may
reasonably be expected to be completed within a maximum 12
months FT / 18 months PT. The re-examination shall be of the
submitted material as a whole and by all examiners.
Possible Outcomes
The candidate does not currently fulfil the criteria for the
award on which they are registered: MPhil with
amendments
The candidate does not fulfil the doctoral award descriptor
criteria but does meet the criteria for MPhil and may be
recommended for this award subject to amendment of the
material in a manner and to a timescale as recommended by
the examiners (up to a maximum of 6 months FT / 9 months
PT). No further examination is required. Amendments to be
approved by one or both / all examiners
Possible Outcomes
The candidate does not currently fulfil the criteria for the
award on which they are registered: Resubmit and be
examined for Mphil
The candidate does not fulfil the doctoral award criteria but
has the potential to meet the criteria for MPhil and may revise
and resubmit the material as indicated by the examiners for
examination for the award of MPhil (within a maximum of 12
months FT / 18 months PT). The examination shall be of
the submitted material as a whole, shall include a viva and
shall be by all examiners.
Possible Outcomes
Degree not awarded
The candidate is not awarded the degree and is not permitted
to be re-examined. (Unsuccessful candidates for DPhil / MPhil
by publication may be permitted to re-apply after a period of
three years.)
Right of Appeal
No grounds on academic judgement
Only if performance was adversely affected or..
Process was incorrectly followed
Further detail in Appendix H2 of Academic Regulations
Questions?