2012 Mississippi State Accountability System Results - Final Districts

Number
Label A - Star B - High Performing C - Successful D - Academic Watch F - Low Performing F - At Risk of Failing F - Failing NA-Excellence For All Pilot Total C and Above 2012 3 47 42 37 17 0 3 3 152 92 2011 4 28 50 43 25 0 2 N/A 152 82

Percentage
2012 2% 31% 28% 24% 11% 0% 2% 2% 100% 61% 2011 3% 19% 33% 28% 16% 0% 1% 100% 54%

Schools
Number
Label A - Star B - High Performing C - Successful D - Academic Watch F - Low Performing F - At Risk of Failing F - Failing NA-Excellence For All Pilot Total C and Above 2012 80 213 216 177 99 0 8 13 806 509 2011 65 181 231 189 128 1 11 N/A 806 477

Percentage
2012 10% 26% 27% 22% 12% 0% 1% 2% 100% 63% 2011 8% 23% 29% 23% 16% 0% 1% 100% 59%

Comparison of District Annual Growth Status

2012
Met Growth Number 104 Percent 70% Number 90

2011
Percent 59%

2012
QDI 200-300 166-199 133-165 100-132 0-99 Totals

Growth Not Met

Number 0 3 22 17 3 45 Percent 0% 2% 15% 11% 2% 30%

Growth Met
Number 3 47 39 15 0 104 Percent 2% 32% 26% 10% 0% 70%

Comparison of School Annual Growth Status

2012
Met Growth Number 502 Percent 63% Number 465

2011
Percent 58%

2012
QDI 200-300 166-199 133-165 100-132 0-99 Totals

Growth Not Met

Number 6 47 131 99 8 291 Percent 1% 6% 17% 12% 1% 37%

Growth Met
Number 80 207 169 46 0 502 Percent 10% 26% 21% 6% 0% 63%

2012 District Performance Classifications

50
45 40 35

47 42 37

Number of Districts

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

20

3
A B C D F Performance Classification

3
Pilot

2012 School Performance Classifications

250

213
200 Number of Schools 150

216 177

107
100

80

50

13
0 A B C D Performance Classification F Pilot

District Performance Classifications (2009 - 2012)

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 A B C D F Pilot

Number of Districts

2009
2010 2011 2012

Performance Classification

School Performance Classifications (2009 - 2012) 300 250 Number of Schools

200
150 100
2009 2010

2011
2012

50
0 A B C D F Performance Classification Pilot

District Letter Grade Counts (2009 - 2012) 100 90

90

80
Number of Districts 70 60

74

70 57 50 32
A&B

50
40 30 20 10 0 2009 2010 2011

D&F

23

27

2012

School Letter Grade Counts (2009 - 2012) 450 400

406

350
Number of Schools 300 250 200 150 100

346

329

293 284
A&B

246 221 176

D&F

50
0 2009 2010 2011 2012

2012 Mississippi Differentiated Accountability System Results - Final

Differentiated Accountability Label High Performing Reward High Progress Reward On Target Approaching Target Focus Schools Priority Schools Title I - No DA Label Total Title I Non Title I Schools Total Schools Number of Schools 10 28 361 187 75 42 17 720 175 895 Percent All Schools 1.1% 3.1% 40.3% 20.9% 8.4% 4.7% 1.9% 80.4% 19.6% 80.6% Percent Title I Schools 1.4% 3.9% 50.1% 26.0% 10.4% 5.8% 2.4% 100%

Mississippi Statewide Accountability System: AMO Summary Tables for 2012 The following tables present the number of districts and schools that met Annual Measurable Objectives in 2012.

AMO Variable Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Other Academic Indicators

District Level Number of Districts Meeting AMO in 2012 15 (10% of 152) 30 (20% of 152) 139 (91% of 152) 9 districts (6% of 152) met AMO in all three areas (reading/language arts, mathematics, and other academic indicators). School Level Number of Schools Meeting AMO in 2012 229 (26% of 895) 304 (34% of 895) 873 (98% of 895) 136 schools (15% of 895) met AMO in all three areas (reading/language arts, mathematics, and other academic indicators).

AMO Variable Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Other Academic Indicators

Number of Title I Schools Meeting AMO in 2012 187 (26% of 716) 250 (35% of 716) 698 (98% of 716) 115 Title I schools (16% of 716) met AMO in all three areas (reading/language arts, mathematics, and other academic indicators).