Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Typical Applications
Fans Pumps Compressors Conveyers Machine tools
International Energy Agency estimates 7% of global electricity demand could be saved by higher energy efficiency motors HEMs are cost effective solutions
Standards
Diverging standards and different classification schemes have been used
Comparison of MEPS
Standards
Standards
Overcoming Barriers
Mandatory minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) Improve access to information and market transparency
Labeling schemes, standard harmonization
Financial and non-financial incentives Training and education Introduction of energy management systems/requirements
Southeast Asia network of climate change focal points
A Short Video
Case Study 1
Second largest oil field in China The total power consumption in the oil field ~ 7 billion kWh
3.11 billion kWh goes to motors
Total quantity of motors with high power consumption and low efficiency is 14,000 Operating hours 7,200 per year Average price for power 0.45 Yuan per kWH Replacement of standards motors
2 x 22KW, 1 x 30KW, 2 x 37KW, 2 x 45KW, 1 x 55KW
25% Motors >200kW each The rest Motors <200kW each
60%
15%
Case Study 1
Power consumption before and after the replacement
Before the replacement Output (m3) 12,296.8 Unit consumption by calculation Power (kWh) 44,779 Unit consumption by calculation After the replacement Output (m3) 12,400
Power (kWh) 38,869
Total
Total
3.64kWh/m3
3.13kWh/m3
Case Study 1
The output variation is very small (0.83%) The average power saving rate
4477938869 13.2 44779
Monthly saved power: 5,910 kWh Annually saved power: 5910 * 1270,920 kWh
Case Study 1
Total investment for motor replacement: 52,500 yuan (US$7,600) Annually saved power (0.46 yuan/kWh) 32,600 yuan (US$4,700) Recovery for investment: 5.25/3.261.61 years The service life of high efficiency motor is 15 years => total gain is 486,000 yuan Total electricity saving potential over 400 million kWh per annum
Southeast Asia network of climate change focal points
Case Study 2
Manufactures medium density fireboard and related products in Malaysia Estimated annual electricity cost of the manufacturing facilities is about RM14 million A 10 year old 37 kW rated motor driving the boiler feed water pump for the manufacturing process
Based on life span of 15 years ROI on the motor premium 30% per year with tax relief 15% per year without tax relief.
Case Study 3
A leading provider of technology and products enabling people to store, access, and manage information (Thailand) To increase the reliability of the temperature control system through the redundant operation of Chilled water Pump and Cooling Water Pump to their central air conditioning system. Two additional 3- phase induction motors, 55kW and 75kW, along with pumps were installed in parallel with the existing systems
Case Study 3
Application
Standard Motor Full Load Efficiency Purchasing Price ( US $ ) USD1,575 USD2,250 Full Load Efficiency 93.6% 94.3%
91.5% 91.8%
Case Study 3
Application
Cooling Water Pump (55kW)
Model
Standard Motor High Efficiency Motor
kW consumed
62.7 57
Case Study 3
Application Additional Investments for HEMs (USD) USD1,600 USD 500 Electricity Cost Payback Period Saving Per Month for additional (USD ) investment for HEMs USD 82.8 USD 205.2 19.3 months 2.4 months
Cooling Water Pump were overloaded Chilled water pump motors 95% of rated capacity Monthly operation 720 hours (8,640 per year) Energy cost = US$ 0.05/kWh
Southeast Asia network of climate change focal points
Conclusion
In most cases, the investment cost of HEMs, in relation to standard motors, can be recovered within a short period