Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A tentative definition 7.2. The structure of the syllable. Phonotactic constraints 7.3 The importance of segmental sonority for the syllable structure 7.4. Constraints on onsets 7.5. Constraints on codas 7.6. Syllabic consonants. Non-vocalic nuclei 7.7. Syllabification in English
S O R N
t
]
Co
p l
S O R N
p l
The same interpretation will be assigned to sequences of obstruent+ liquid l like supple [s-pl], table [tew-bl], cattle [k-tl], fiddle [fw-dl], sickle [sw-kl], bagel [bew-gl], siffle [sw fl], shovel [-vl], castle [kY:sl], hazel [hewzl] or obstruent+nasal m: chasm [kzm], rhythm [ri-m]; obstruent+nasal n: deepen [di:-pn], ribbon [rw-bn], cotton [k] -tn], ridden [rw-dn], bacon [bew-kn], waggon [wgn], soften [s]-fn], raven [rewvn], fasten [fY:-sn], brazen [brew-zn], heathen [hi:-n] cushion [ku-n], vision [vi:-n]. In rhotic accents, the liquid r can also be a syllable nucleus: brother [brr]. In all the cases above we deal with non-vocalic elements (sonorants: nasals or glides), occupying the position of the nucleus. Such consonants are called syllabic consonants. Their relatively high degree of sonority allows them to replace the vowels in this otherwise typically vocalic position. Most languages (Romanian included) do not have syllabic consonants, but English is not unique in this respect, Czech for instance being another language that includes such sounds. (See above, in Chapter 5, the discussion of the feature +/- syllabic introduced by Chomsky and Halle in SPE in 1968).