Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT - En Banc - Manila JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

, Petitioner, - versus JUDICIAL AND BAR COUNCIL (JBC), Respondent.

X------------------------------------------------------------X

G.R. NO. _______ ___ For: Certiorari

VERY URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the July 6 & 9-10, 2012 exclusion ruling of the Judicial and Bar Council. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction to review the Judicial and Bar Council En Banc July 6 & 9-10, 2012 exclusion ruling (removing the name of Petitioner from the Long List of Panel Interview Chief Justice candidates set for July 24-27, 2012) pursuant to Sections 5 (1), 7 (1), (3), 8 (1), (5) & 9 of Article VIII, Sections 1, 5 & 21, ARTICLE III of the 1987 Philippine Constitution in relation to Rule 39, Sec. 47 (res judicata, stare decisis, law of the case and bar by former judgment - finality of decision in administrative cases against Judges), Rule 65, Section 1, Revised Rules of Court & JBC-

009, Sections 1, 2 & 5, inter alia.

PREFATORY

The lankmark impeachment of Chief Justice Renato C. Corona on May 29, 2012 did occur just years and months after the Petitioner repeatedly predicted (in CODED messages and in no uncertain English language, inserted in several SC pleadings) the Corona Spinea. Even before
-1-

the next dire prophecy actually happens, it is giving rise to many mystic (including legal) dilemmas.

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

May the respondent Judicial and Bar Council (hereinafter referred to as JBC, for brevity) exclude the Petitioner from its 6 & 9-10 July, 2011 Long List of Chief Justice candidates for its January 24-27, 2012 Panel Interview

(http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pio/news/2012/07/longlist.pdf)

(for its final selection/voting set for July 30, 2012, allegedly for failure to meet the standards set by the JBC-009, specifically because of a P 10,000.00 fine and/or 2006 75-page Minita Viray Chico-Nazario Pyschosis Judgment due to dwarf consultation in A.M. No. RTJ-991460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr)? What is the relevance of the final and executory SC En Banc Resolution dated 12 April, 2011 which did NOTE and GRANT Petitioners April 1, 2011 Supplemental Omnibus Motions / Appeal for Reinstatement, etc. (to admit new evidence and to revise, amend and reverse the 2006 Judgment, inter alia)? Does certiorari lie to rectify the exclusion of Petitoner from the Long List of Nominees and Applicants to be interviewed by the respondent JBC on July 24-27, 2012, and be finally considered for its Final (Short) List to be submitted to the President by July 30, 2012?

CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND LAWS INVOLVED This petition raises questions of interpretation regarding
Sections 5 (1), 7 (1), (3), 8 (1), (5) & 9 of Article VIII, Sections 1, 5 & 21,

ARTICLE III of the 1987 Philippine Constitution in relation to Rule 39, Sec. 47 (res judicata, stare decisis, law of the case and bar by former
judgment - finality of decision in administrative cases against Judges), Rule 65, Section 1, Revised Rules of Court & JBC-009, Sections 1, 2 & 5, inter alia.

-2-

Sections 5 (1), 7 (1), (3), 8 (1), (5) & 9 of Article VIII, and Sections 1, 5 & 21, ARTICLE III of the 1987 Philippine Constitution state that: Article VIII: Section 5. The Supreme Court shall have the following powers: 1) Exercise original jurisdiction xxx over petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, xxx.

Section 7. (1) No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have been for fifteen years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. xxx (3) A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence. Section 8. (1) A Judicial and Bar Council is hereby created under the supervision of the Supreme Court composed of the Chief Justice as ex officio Chairman, the Secretary of Justice, and a representative of the Congress as ex officio Members, a representative of the Integrated Bar, a professor of law, a retired Member of the Supreme Court, and a representative of the private sector. Xxx. (5) The Council shall have the principal function of recommending appointees to the Judiciary. It may exercise such other functions and duties as the Supreme Court may assign to it. Section 9. The Members of the Supreme Court and judges of the lower courts shall be appointed by the President from a list of at least three nominees prepared by the Judicial and Bar Council for every vacancy. Such appointments need no confirmation. ARTICLE III: Section 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws. Section 5. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political
-3-

rights.cralaw Section 16. All persons shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative bodies. Section 21. No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. If an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to another prosecution for the same act. Rule 39, Sec. 47 (res judicata, stare decisis, law of the case and
bar by former judgment - finality of decision in administrative cases against Judges), and Rule 65, Section 1, Revised Rules of Court & JBC-009 state that:

Rule 39, Sec. 47. Effect of judgments or final orders. The effect of a judgment or final order rendered by a court of the Philippines, having jurisdiction to pronounce the judgment or final order, may be as follows: (a) In case of a judgment or final order against a specific thing, or in respect to the probate of a will, or the administration of the estate of a deceased person, or in respect to the personal, political, or legal condition or status of a particular person or his relationship to another, the judgment or final order is conclusive upon the title to the thing, the will or administration, or the condition, status or relationship of the person; however, the probate of a will or granting of letters of administration shall only be prima facie evidence of the death of the testator or intestate; (b) In other cases, the judgment or final order is, with respect to the matter directly adjudged or as to any other matter that could have been raised in relation thereto, conclusive between the parties and their successors in interest by title subsequent to the commencement of the action or special proceeding, litigating for the same thing and under the same title and in the same capacity; and (c) In any other litigation between the same parties or their successors in interest, that only is deemed to have been adjudged in a former judgment or final order which appears upon its face to have been so adjudged, or which

-4-

was actually and necessarily included therein or necessary thereto. RULE 65 CERTIORARI, Section 1. Petition for certiorari. When any tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions has acted without or in excess of its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered annulling or modifying the proceedings of such tribunal, board or officer, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require. The petition shall be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of nonforum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. JBC-009 RULE STATUTORY APPOINTMENT - CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND FOR

Rule 2 - SECTION 1. Qualifications applicable to all Members of the Judiciary and the Ombudsman and his deputies.- (a) No person may be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court or as Ombudsman or deputy Ombudsman unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines (CONST. Art. VIII, Section 7, par. 1; Id., Art. XI, Section 8). (b) No person may be appointed judge of any court lower than a collegiate court unless he is a citizen of the Philippines (CONST. Art. VIII, Section 7, par. 2). (c) A Member of the Judiciary must be of proven competence, integrity, probity and independence (id., id., par. 3) and a member of the Philippine Bar (id., id., par. 2). SEC. 2. Additional qualifications for Members of the Supreme Court. - No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court unless he is at least forty years of age and must have been for fifteen years or more a judge

-5-

of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. (id., id., par 1). SEC. 5. Disqualification. - The following are disqualified from being nominated for appointment to any judicial post or as Ombudsman or Deputy Ombudsman: 1. Those with pending criminal or regular administrative cases; 2. Those with pending criminal cases in foreign courts or tribunals; and 3. Those who have been convicted in any criminal case; or in an administrative case, where the penalty imposed is at least a fine of more than P10,000, unless he has been granted judicial clemency. SEC. 6. Other instances of disqualification.- Incumbent judges, officials or personnel of the Judiciary who are facing administrative complaints under informal preliminary investigation (IPI) by the Office of the Court Administrator may likewise be disqualified from being nominated if, in the determination of the Council, the charges are serious or grave as to affect the fitness of the applicant for nomination. For purposes of this Section and of the preceding Section 5 insofar as pending regular administrative cases are concerned, the Secretary of the Council shall, from time to time, furnish the Office of the Court Administrator the name of an applicant upon receipt of the application/recommendation and completion of the required papers; and within ten days from receipt thereof the Court Administrator shall report in writing to the Council whether or not the applicant is facing a regular administrative case or an IPI case and the status thereof. In regard to the IPI case, the Court Administrator shall attach to his report copies of the complaint and the comment of the respondent. http://jbc.judiciary.gov.ph/index.php/jbc-rules-andregulations/jbc-009

NATURE OF THE PETITION This is a petition to issue a writ of certiorari under Section 1 of Rule 65, Revised Rules of Court, to wit: the respondent Judicial and Bar Council, a Constitutional body created by the 1987 Constitution which exercises judicial or quasi-judicial functions, has acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction, and with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or
-6-

excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, since Petitioners July 6, 9 & 10, 2012 exclusion from the Long List of Chief Justice candidates scheduled for JBC Panel Interview (on July 24-27, 2012) is null and void under the law and Constitution. Ergo, Petitioner is praying that judgment be rendered annulling the exclusion ruling and proceedings of the Council, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require. The petition is accompanied by a) the attached Original of the published (PD Inquirer, July 10, 2012, Annex A hereof) JBC En Banc ruling, judgment, order or resolution subject thereof (which clearly shows that the name of Peitioner is not included, corroborated by print and broadcast media announcements by JBC ex-officio Members Cong. Neil S. Tupas, Senator Francis Joseph Chiz G. Escudero and Atty. Jose V. Mejia (which official statements can be taken judicial notice of by the Court), b) copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a c) sworn certification of non-forum shopping, inter alia.

THE PARTIES The Petitioner Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. (Judge Floro, for brevity), is of legal age, Filipino, registered taxpayer, and resident of c/o Engr. Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 Bulacan, where he may be served with Court summons, orders and processes. The respondent Judicial and Bar Council, (JBC, for brevity) created by the 1987 Constitution, under the supervision of the Supreme Court, has office address at 2nd Floor, Centennial Bldg., Supreme Court, Padre Faura, Manila Philippines 1000 (Email: jbc@sc.judiciary.gov.ph jbc87supremecourt@gmail.com Phone No.: (02) 552-9512 / 552-9608 Fax No.: (02) 552-9607), where it may be served with Court summons, orders and processes.

-7-

STATEMENT OF RECEIPT BY THE PETITIONER OF THE JBC EN BANC EXCLUSION RULING AND ITS DENIAL OF PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION The JBC had repeatedly denied Petitoiners Verified Applications/Nominations for appointment to several vacant judicial posts since 1999. It continuously denied in writing many Letters-Applications of Petitioner filed since 2000 also in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Petitioner filed on June 18, 2012, a Verified Application-Nomination for the vacant Chief Justice post. On print and broadcast media, JBC Members Atty. Jose Mejia and Senator Chiz Escudero, inter alia openly announced that Petitoners Application was denied by the JBC. Because of the denial, Petitioner filed a Verified Motion for Reconsideration with the JBC on July 2, 2012, begging for inclusion in the JBC Long List of Nominees for its Panel Interview set for July 24-27, 2012. The respondent JBC denied the Motion for Reconsideration in its 2 En Banc meetings. As proof, the JBC, per Atty. Jose Mejia and Cong. Neil Tupas announced on TV and print media that Petitioner was excluded, on the ground that the 2006 Psychosis-Dismissal Decision disqualifies the latter in the CJ derby. Forthwith, or on July 6, 9 and 10, 2012, Petitioner received notice of the final JBC denial of the ApplicationNomination and Motion for Reconsideration. Aside from the URLs and the news copy pasted hereunder, the Original of the PD Inquirer JBC Announcement-Publication dated July 10, 2012 (which excluded Petitioner from the final JBC Long List of Panel Inteview Nominees, as contenders) is attached as Annex A, part hereof. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On February 9, 2010, Petitioner received the JBC Letter signed by Executive Officer, Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite which did NOTE Petitioners February 4, 2010 Verified Application for Chief Justice per the

-8-

8 February 2010 JBC En Banc Ruling. [Copy of the 9 February 2010 JBC Letter signed by Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite is attached as Annex B]. Petitioner also received on March 25, 2010, the JBC Comment in G.R. No. 191002, Arturo De Casto vs. JBC, March 17, 2010, Letter signed by Clerk of Court Enriqueta Vidal, which did state that The JBC excluded from consideration former RTC Judge Florentino Floro (for failure to meet the standards set by the JBC rules); and Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio of the Office of the Ombudsman (due to cases pending in the Office of the Ombudsman). [Copies of pages 1 and 5 of the JBC Comment in G.R. No. 191002, A. De Casto vs. JBC, March 17, 2010, Letter signed by Enriqueta Vidal, is attached as Annex B-1]. On April 28, 2011, Petitioner filed with the JBC his Verified Application for SC Associate Justice vacated by Justices Nachura and Carpio-Morales. On page 2, he attached his picture wearing a crown of Bandera Espanola and holding the pictures of Justices and persons who caused his 14 years suffering. He also held a luces (burning bright). [Copies of the Application and page 2 thereof are attached as Annexes O, O-1]. Petitioner was also not included in the List of JBC nominees for SC Associate Justice per the 2 May 2011 JBC En Banc Ruling. [Copy of the JBC letter which was received by Petitioner is attached as Annex B2]. On May 27, 2011, Petitioner received the JBC Letter signed by Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, which did state that Petitioner was not included in the List of JBC nominees for Ombudsman per the 23 May 2011 JBC En Banc Ruling, citing Sec. 5, Rule 4, JBC-009 which disqualifies those who were administratively sanctioned or fined with P 10,000 or more, unless granted clemency. [Copy of the 27 May 2011 JBC Letter signed by Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, is attached as Annex B-3].

-9-

On June 3, 2011, Petitioner filed with the JBC an Opposition to Justice Carpio-Morales Application for Ombudsman and Motion for Reconsideration of the JBC exclusion ruling of May 27, 2011. [Copies of pages 1 and 3 of the same are attached as Annexes P, P-1]. On October 7, 2011, Petitioner filed an Omnibus Motion to be paid 9 years back wages in in A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr). In the Motion, Petitioner predicted Renato C. Coronas Impeachment. The Court on October 11, 2011 NOTED WITHOUT ACTION the pleading. [Copy of page 1 of the Motion and the October 11, 2011 SC En Banc Resolution are attached as Annex R]. On February 3, 2012, Petitioner filed a 131-page Omnibus Motion to be paid 9 years back wages in A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr). In the Motion, Petitioner predicted Renato C. Coronas Spinea conviction, including the fate or destiny of Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio, specifically on pages 1, 2, 3, 12, 34, 25-28 thereof. The Court on February 14, 2012 NOTED WITHOUT ACTION the pleading. [Copies of pages 1, 2, 3, the 4 pictures of Petitioner, 12, 34, 25-28 thereof of the Motion are attached as Annexes Q, Q-1, collectively]. Because of new evidence, inter alia, and invoking Soria v. Villegas, Petitioner filed on April 1, 2011, his 4th or even Nth Appeal for Reinstatement, that is, to declare null and void the 75-page PsychosisDuende Nazario Decision dated March 31, 2006. The April 12, 2011 SC En Banc Resolution did NOTE and GRANT the Appeal. No appeal was filed, considering that aside from the OCAD as nominal complainant, there is and there was no private complainant. The Reinstatement Resolution became final and executory 15 days after the JBC, OCAD and other offices received the final Reinstatement Resolution, about the end of April, 2011

- 10 -

or about May 1, 2011. [Copies of the Appeal and Resolution are attached as Annexes A, A-2]. Considering that the final April 12, 2011 SC En Banc Resolution nullified en toto the Psychosis decision, including the findings of dismissal, duende consultation and P 40,000 fine, inter alia, Petitioner filed the June 18, 2012 Application for Chief Justice. The PD Inquirer, inter alia published the story [Copies of page 1 of the JBC CJ Application and the PD Inquirer report are attached as Annexes A-3, A4]. On July 2, 2012, Petitioner filed with the JBC his Verified Motion for Reconsideration of the JBC En Banc exclusion ruling per media announcement of Sen. Chiz Escudero. Petitioner on May 13, 2011 predicted in writing, and submitted to the Court Chizs fate, that he is not destined to become President. Chiz suffered the June 26, 2011 vehicular accident resulting to serious physical injuries of his hand, total wreck of his car, extreme injuries to others, and lately, he admitted to media, his filed annulment of marriage. [Copies of pages 1, 2 & 3 of the Appeal is attached as Annex A-5]. Petitioner submitted to the JBC copies of - his Ateneo Law School, 1978-1982 Full Second Honors cards, 1974 Ateneo de Manila University Pre-Divinity TSN, grades, 1982 Ateneo Law School TSN, grades, May 7, 1984 Daily Express report on his 12th place, 1983 Bar Exams, where only 20% passed as one of the hardest in history, his 87.55% Bar Rating Certificate issued by the OBC, SC [Copies of the documents are attached as Annexes A-6, A-7]. Petitioner also submitted to the JBC the causa of his 14 years suspension, xerox of the displayed on his Court sala, Erap will not finish his term prophecy published on December 8, 1998 and predicted on Good Friday, 1998 even before the elections; the document also bears the Manila

- 11 -

Bulletin report on the carotid operation of CJ Davide, Jr. on July 17, 2002, the same month and day, Hilario, Sr. died in pain due to lingering illness on July 17, 2006, 2 months after the Nazario Court dismissed Petitioner [Copy of the document is attached as Annexes A-8]. Davide, Jr. survived his Impeachment but his 2 brothers Jorge and Jose died in extreme pain on 2004, while his son Hilario III lost P 15+++ in the Cebu governor race. As if these kamalasans are not enough punishment due to Karma, including the Curse & Spell of the 3 duendes, Davide, Jr. was lambasted in the null and void Truth Commission, after he resigned from the UN post (loosing P 1.8 million salary/ per month). Today, Davide, Jr. is poorer and poorer vis-vis rich and famous Regino C. Hermosisisma, Jr. and former law partner Cebu Assemblyman Filemon Fernandez (a legal luminary who consulted Petitioner on the latters pending and multi-televised SC case). Petitioner also submitted to the JBC, his written prophecies on the downfall and hurting of PGMA. [Copies of the documents - The 1999 Gift of Prophecy, on the hurting and fall of PGMA, the PD Inquirer report on her Marcelo scam, the 2003 Davide, Jr. Impeachment predictions on PGMA, Benipayo, De Venecia and Ramos fate and tragedies, pages 1, 20 & 21, and the December 5, 2003 Vision of Pains, page 1, are attached as Annexes A-9, A-10, A-11]. Petitioner also submitted to the JBC, his written propheciesaccount dated August 17, 2005, where at Heritage Hotel, he did predict to his classmates Mayor Jerry P. Trenas, RTC Judge Imelda Portes-Saulog, tycoon Christine Tomas and a woman representative of CJ Renato C. Corona the spinal cord-downfall; thereat, Petitioner foretold and warned his classmates on the Corona Spinea and several dire pains upon Ateneo Law School Class 1982. [Copy of the document is attached as Annex A12]. Petitioner submitted to the JBC, the September 2, 2007 HK Standard report which published his prophecy of PGMAs hurting
- 12 -

coinciding with her irreversible downfall, and added that prior to her fate, she would survive her legal battles, and the nation would suffer as a result. The prophecy did happen on the very natal day of Petitioner on November 5, 2011, causa of the November 15, 2011 long incarceration of the Corona Spinea President [Copy of the document is attached as Annex A-15]. Petitioner told the JBC, that the Blue Madonna-Blessed Virgin Mary Motion dated April 4, 2008 was expunged by the Court on June 3, 2008, resulting in the killings of 34 Ampatuan massacre Filipino journalists, the prophecy clearly sought to be prevented by the Marian Motion, and corroborated by the death of Leo Dacera III+, Ateneo Law School Class 1982, lead counsel of the Ampatuan case, hours before the November 5, 2011 birthday of Petitioner. Gma NewsTV reported the CJ Application of Petitoner who predicted the Ampatuan massacre [Copies of the motion, resolution and news report are attached as Annexes A-16, A-17, A-18]. In his Reynato S. Puno disbarment case filed on May 18, 2010, Petitioner inscribed in his own handwriting the Corona Spinea dire prophecy based on the Gov. Nantes plane tragedy on that day, a sign on the wall and put in the stars (a fake Crown which, on that day began to haunt the 2x spinal cord operated Magistrate sitting on a rotten throne) [Copies of pages 1 and 31 of the disbarment motion are attached as Annex A-20].

RELEVANT ANTECEDENTS AND FACTS OF THE CASE 1. This case traces its genesis to the controversy that has arisen from the 1996 massive stroke of JBC Member Teresita Tesie Cruz Sison [including the 1996 cardiac attack of JBC Member Francisco Tito Santiago (husband of SC Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago, the principal co-author of the 2006 Floro Dismissal Judgment; the principal author is
- 13 -

Renato C. Corona, due to vendetta, because of Petitioners prophecy of the most painful twin spinal cord surgeries), and a 1997 SC stairs accident, all] foretold before JBC regular Member Justice Campos by Petitioner, on September 19, 1995, 10:00 a.m. [Copy of the September 1, 1995 JBC letter signed by Guillermo Girang, JBC officer, setting Petitioners Panel Interview for September 19, 1995, on the vacant post of Br. 49, RTC, Guagua, Pampanga, is attached as Annex C]. 2. On October 9, 1998, Marcelo B. Fernan, Senate President, per Ma. Aurora F. Ledesma wrote the JBC regarding Petitioners JBC November 5, 1997 Application for Br. 73, RTC, Malabon, M.M. Fernan resigned the Senate Presidency on June 28, 1999 due to his failing health. He died of cancer only days later, on July 11 in Manila. He was buried in Cebu City. A newly built bridge was named after him linking Mandaue City to Mactan Island. [Copy of the October 9, 1998 Fernan letter to the JBC is attached as Annex D]. Aurora Santiago-Lagman, who was appointed RTC, Malolos Judge also witnessed the demeanor of Petitioner who appeared on crossexamination for accused Mr. Rolando Salvania (robbery case pending at her sala). Days after Petitioners final appearance, Lagmans sala was destroyed by a mystic fire foretold by Petitioner. Lagmans neighbor Judge Fe Torres-Arcilla, Br. 84, RTC, Malolos resigned due to failing health. After these twin tribulations, the accused, Mr. Salvania was brutally murdered, having been accused by drug pushers as informer. 3. The JBC excluded Petitioner from the final list of nominees for RTC Malabon in 1998. Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. and Justice Alfredo Marigomen, during good times, directed Petitioner to submit counter-mental tests for submission to the Narvasa JBC En Banc. Petitioner, meek as a lamb, did not disobey Hermosisima, Jr. The Makati Medical Center mental tests were considered by the JBC En Banc presided by CJ Andres Narvasa. During the JBC Meeting, Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison ay naglulupasay on the floor because of anger (said Justice R. Hermosisima, Jr., since CJ Narvasa broke the tie vote which made Judge
- 14 -

Floro a Judge who was appointed by ERAP on his birthday on November 4/5, 1998, the youngest NCJR Judge at the age of 45). [Copies of the Sepember 3, 4 & 4, 1998 positive mental tests (against the SC Medical Clinic falsified Floro tests manufacture by Celeste Vista and Beatriz O. Cruz), consisting of Makati Medical Center Psychiatric Evaluations of Dr. Eduardo L. Jurilla & Dr. Pacita Salcedo-Ramos, and Psychological Report of Psychologist, Dr. Ma. Theresa Gustillo-Villasor, Ph.D. are attached as Annexes E, E-1 & E-2, respectively]. 4. Before Petitioner was suspended on July 20, 1999, Justice Alfredo Marigomen and Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. told the duende Magistrate that a circulating Memorandum of Suspension was for signature. Petitioners neighbor, Judge Bienvenido L. Reyes, Br. 74, RTC, Malabon, now SC Justice, confirmed that the Memorandum was manufactured at Malabon Canteen (which was later burned by the 3 duendes). On July 22, 1999, Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. told Petitioner that it was Flerida Ruth-Romero who (was due for retirement) authored the cursed suspension. Hermosisima, Jr. further stated that Justice Jose Melo told the former, Floro, kuro-kuro! On 3 ocassions, that is, on 3 Sundays after August 21, 1999, when Petitioner was televised as Healing Judge by Abs-Cbn, Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. was treated by Petitioner through spiritual and physical healing due to a 1997 SC stairs shoulder accident. He and his wife Rosemarie served Petitioner biscuits and food. On more than 60 occasionsvisits, Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. received Petitioner in his old and new Chambers, even receiving more than 20 vials of coconut healing oil prepared by the dwarf Judge. In exchange again, Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. bestowed upon Petitioner 2 handwritten Christmas Letters dated 24 December 1999 & 12 November, 2003, which prove that the dwarf consultation is a lie and the truth is that the Prophet of prophets, Judge Floro is a Global Annihilator who easily inflicts illnesses upon Magistrates and their loved ones, inter alia. Regino asked Petitioner to
- 15 -

predict the problematic appointments of Sabino R. De Leon and Renato C. Corona. The former died of aneurysm after denying the 20 requests for appointment of his Ateneo Law School legal philosophy student, the Petitioner. In failing to be the Ponente in Petitioners case, Renato C. Corona, who got what he wanted due to the Prophecy requested by Regino, even dismissed Petitioner in 2006 amid the early retirement of Floros 3rd Ponente, Alicia Austria-Martinez due to the alleged dreaded disease of Alzeimers. The last visit of Petitioner to Regino Hermosisima, Jr. was on 10 February, 2006 or a month before the promulgation of the cursed 2006 Psychosis Judgment. Petitioner got so mad, for Justice Minita Viray-Chico Nazario approached Regino at a dinner, asking the 4 times JBC Chair to convince Petitioner to accept the 3 years back wages Dismissal Judgment. [Copies of the handwritten Christmas Letters dated 24 December 1999 & 12 November, 2003 of Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. to Petitioner are attached as Annex 1]. On May 21, 2002, NBI Deputy Director Diego Gutierez, husband of the 3rd co-author of Petitioners 2006 dismissal Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, died of lung cancer. Angelina had to suffer gall bladder surgery on February, 2006, a month before the 2006 Floro Dismissal signed by her, even if SC Finance chief Lilian Co underwent the same operation exactly at the time of the release of the cursed 2006 Decision on April 6-7, 2006 [Copy of Manila Bulletin report dated 21 May 2002 is attached as Annex G-1]. 5. Petitioner did beg, and tiklop-tuhod na nagmakaawa sa mga JBC Members to be nominated by the JBC for several judicial posts, since 2000: a) his Ateneo Law Professor JBC ex-officio member Nani Perez on 2004 rejected Petitioner on the ground of pending case; Nani was hospitalized for a gall bladder disease, and was ousted due to the Mark Jimenez Omen; Perez lost in the Batangas elections and was charged in the Sandiganbayan, with his co-accused cancer-stricken wife Rosario (stage 2 cancer); b) After JBC ex-officio member Rene "Compaero" Cayetano received several JBC letters of Petitioner, the former died from
- 16 -

complications in abdominal cancer on June 24, 2003, at his home in Ayala Alabang, Muntinlupa City. He is buried in his hometown of Pateros; c) JBC ex-officio member Miriam Defensor Santiago also rejected Petitioners personal visit; as prophesied, her son Alexander Robert "AR" Santiago allegedly committed suicide at the age of 22 on November 20, 2003, when Petitioners Ateneo Law School classmate and school mate Mel Sta. Maria and Dean S. Candelaria, gave A.R. failing marks, in persons and constitutional law, respectively. After the disbarment case against her was filed by Petitioner and after the Court dismissed the pleading, she suffered several illnesses, such as anorexia, and continued to lose weight. In the impeachment, she was haunted by hypertension problems. On April 14, 2008, Miriam Defensor-Santiago was seriously injured and rushed to the Cardinal Santos Medical Center, Greenhils, San Juan City, after she slipped and bumped her head during the birthday party of her husband, Narciso, in Mandaluyong City. She had to undergo surgery requiring 3 stitches on her head. On 29 Aug 2008, Miriam's 73-year old aunt was stabbed dead; and d) On 14 April 2005, JBC ex-officio member Pasig City Congressman Henry Lanot was attacked and shot in the brain by a hired killer. [Copies of the June 30, 2003 Tempo report on the death of Cayetano, June 28, 2003 Manila Bulletin report on liver cancer of Cayetano, the SC announcement of Sabino de Leons death; and page 10 of a 2002 Motion begging for mercy from the 4 JBC ex-officio members, Perez, Cayetano, Santiago and Lanot, are attached as Annexes H, H-1]. 6. On 7 August 2003, Usec. Arturo D. Brion and wife Antonietta C. Articona or Tonette Brion (Ateneo Law School 4 yearsclassmate, seatmate of Petitioner, who was appointed CA Justice), bestowed upon Petitioner a handwritten letter of gratitude (re: Manila Polo Club P 700 dinner, for Brion and CTA Tax Appeals Justice Lovell Bautista, another classmate of Petitioner). At the Pandacan house of the Brions, Petitioners classmate Tonette Brion was spiritually healed by the former, who even conducted Spanish Card psychic reading for her own sake. The Brions did serve Petitioner pancit canton before their secretary Marisa.
- 17 -

Petitioner further repeatedly served Tonette with same Spanish card vibrations (about 2 times) in the Court Appeals Judicial Chambers of Art. The same Spanish card was used by Petitioner upon request of Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno, per his sister Marilyn and his closest friendstaff, Jasmin Mateo. Petitioner conducted 3 hours Spanish Card reading in the SC conference hall used by SC Justices to deliberate cases. [In A.M. No. 2006-24-SC. November 14, 2006, JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. v. MRS. MARILYN PUNO SANTIAGO AND JASMIN MATEO En Banc, the Court dismissed the complaint of Petitioner alleging he was shortchanged by CJ Puno, who used his sister and Ms. Mateo to grab the CJ Position after his heartless spouse Luzviminda Delgado Puno paid the price 5 days after Petitioner was dismissed on April 7, 2006. Luz expired amid excruciating pain due to heart disease and failed puso surgery at St. Lukes.[http://www.chanrobles.com/scresolutions/resolutions/2006/november/am_2006_24_sc.php] The same Spanish card was also used by Petitioner upon Ariel Villasanta in Totoo TV when Petitioner predicted that Ariel would marry a wealthy matrona. [Copies of the 7 August 2003, Usec. Arturo D. Brion (and wife Tonette Brion) letter and the Spanish Cards are attached as Annexes detailpage] 7. On March 15, 2004 and March 26, 2004, Petitioner filed a 24-page SC Certiorari Petition and JBC Letter, respectively, against JBC Consultant, OCAD Administrator Alfredo L. Benipayo (who signed the Preventive Suspension of Petitioner on July 13, 1999) and in favor of Justice Minita Viray Chico-Nazario, to enthrone her as duly appointed SC Justice against tons of oppositions that stopped her appointment. [Fr. Rolando de La Rosa, O.P., UST, wrote in the Manila Bulletin: "Benipayo had chronic cough that bothered him for years. At first the best doctors thought the trouble was with his lungs. They found out later that it was his heart. He was suffering from CAD (coronary artery disease). His
- 18 -

&

-http://www.youtube.com/watch?

list=UUaXbaalqNLGZiZaX4iYGx8A&v=l_P8sAARITY&feature=player_

heart was clogged." On Feb. 21, 2001, Benipayo underwent angioplasty surgery 5 days after his appointment as Commission on Elections Chair, and more than a year after he caused the suspension of Petitioner]. The Judicial and Bar Council nominated Benipayo for the Supreme Court of the Philippines Associate Justice post, 7 times, but he failed to sit upon the coveted golden throne. On April 1, 2006, Alfredo L. Benipayo tendered his resignation amidst a series of controversies. Benipayo suffered massive stroke on February 21, 2009, and until today, he lives due to multiple medicines to ease the pain inside his heart and to prevent further damage to this brain]. On September 28, 2009, SC Justice Roberto Abad filed a Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Benipayo, attaching a violet thumbmark of Alfredo L. Benipayo whose right or left hand was punished by the 3 mystic dwarves LUIS, Armand and Angel for accusing Petitioner to have suffered from Psychosis and pointing a finger at the 3 duendes, charging them with dwarf consultation offense. On December, 2006, Petitioner wrote the prophecy on the death of Rod Nazario (including the selling of the familys-Minita Viray ChicoNazario BF Homes, Paranaque City ancestral house and lot), on page 359 of the 2006 Dwarves Book: Mark my word, she will regret it! Earlier, Petitioner filed with the Court and with Nazarios office, a Verified November 3-5, 2006 Motion inserting Psalms 109 & 73 Banal na Sumpa or Curse & Imprecation to cleanse the Court and the JBC, inter alia. [Copies of page 1 of the March 15, 2004 & March 26, 2004, 24-page SC Certiorari Petition and JBC Letter, the March 12, 2004 Daily Tribune report SC asked: Drop Sol Gen, Swear in Nazario, pages 1 & 2 of the September 28, 2009, SC Justice Abad pleading with the violet thumbmark of Alfredo L. Benipayo, due to massive stroke, page 359 of the 2006 Dwarves Book & the PD Inquirer report on the November 3-5, 2006 Motion including the Psalms 109 & 73 Banal na Sumpa or Curse & Imprecation are attached as Annexes F, F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4 & L].

- 19 -

8. On 2004, Petitioner filed Intervention pleadings with the High Court, specifically in the case of Lopez vs Comelec, even asking JBC ex-officio member Kiko Pangilinan for mercy (for a JBC vote). His gavel was broken: Really, its, ominous! said Sen. Eduardo Angara. Kiko Pangilinan failed in his attempt to join the VP race won by Binay. [Copies of the broken gavel picture in a report of Manila Standard Today, June 17, 2004, and Daily Tribune, June 4, 2004 are attached as Annexes G, G1]. 9. As prophesied on Petitioners November 3-5, 2006 Psalms 109 & 73 Imprecation & Curse upon the JBC and Supreme Court to cleanse their corridors of power from Satans darkness and commands, 4 successive mystic court fires - the Supreme Court, on January 17, 2007, Comelec, on March 12, 2007, Court of Appeals, on July 22, 2007 & Muntinlupa MTC 3-hour fire on August 4, 2007 - did duplicate the Malabon July 22, 2000 5th divine fire that preserved Petitioners sala and burned all other corrupt RTC courts-offices including the canteen where the cursed suspension was manufactured. Petitioner even caused as prophesied, the aneurysm and cancer deaths of Caloocan City RTC Judge Ed Acunas 24 year old son and of Br. 74, RTC Malabon (successor of Justice Bienvenido L. Reyes), Judge Rosa Reyes (who did battle 2 years cancer and expired in extreme pain). The other Malabon neighbor of Petitioner, Judge Benjamin Antonio suffered ear problems causing him to resign amid the epilepsy lifetime disease of Gelay, daughter of Petitioners branch clerk of Court, Esmeralda Galang Dizon (who co-conspired with OCAD officers Thelma C. Bahia and MTC Judge Mary Jane Dacarra-Buenaventura (whose father-in-law, Atty. Gerry Buenaventura suffered fatal heart attack after she testified against Petitioner). [Copies of the pictures of the mystic fires and the PD Inquirer November 3-5, 2006 report on the SC-JBC curse are attached as Annexes K & L ].

- 20 -

10. On February 4, 2010, Petitoner filed the Verified Application for nomination for the Chief Justice vacant post. On March 5, 2010, Petitioner also filed the Intervention case in consolidated SC cases Arturo De Castro vs. JBC, G.R. No. 191002, etc. & Estelito Mendoza, A.M. 10-2-5-SC cases. [Copies of page 1 and page 1, of the Intervention pleadings, PD Inquirer and Philippine Star reports, Judge who talked to dwarves wants to be Chief Justice, respectively, are attached as Annexes L-a, L-1]. 11. On November 21, 2011, Petitioner filed a 14-page Intervention case in G.R. No. 199034, PGMA vs. Leila M. De Lima. Thereat, Petitoner clearly (predicted and) told the Court and the Filipino nation, regarding the OMEN, the fate of the 2 Presidents and the destiny of the Spinea (fake) Chief Justice vis--vis the Curse in the JBC and the Court: on page 6, Petitioner wrote May Gloria pa ba kung wala ng Corona, may bukas pa ba? [Copies of page 1 and page 6 of the Intervention case in G.R. No. 199034, PGMA vs. Leila M. De Lima are respectively attached as Annexes M, M-a]. 12. Undaunted and vehemently angered by the respondent JBCs repeated throwing into the waste basket of his multiple Verifified Applications, Petitioner, in his Verified Opposition to Conchita CarpioMorales Nomination and Motion for Reconsideration of his Ombudsman Application denial, clearly prophesied the fate of Sen. Fracis Joseph Chiz Escudero and the Filipino journalists. 13-26-13 is the coded number: May 13, June 26 and July 13, 2011 - Lourdes Simbulan suffered taxi accident and horrible death, while Senator Escudero suffered car accident which preceded his annulment of marriage woes, and Romeo Olea was murdered (respectively). E kahit naman tanggalin mo ako sa JBC list, ang tanong, magiging Presidente ka ba, ang sagot, hanggang sa dulo ng walang hanggan, kahit may lupa pa sa bundok ng Tra- 21 -

la-la, hindi, hindi at lalong hindi, at hindi pa rin bababa ang gasolina! Kaya magtago ka na, nasa tabi mo na ang 3 duende! Petitioners CODED prophecy heretofore delivered in full to JBC member Chiz Escudero. [Copies of pages 1, 2, 7, 10 to 11 of the May 13, 2011 Verified Opposition to Conchita Carpio-Morales Nomination and Motion for Reconsideration of the Ombudsman Application denial are attached as Annexes M-1, M-2 & M-3]. Aside from his letter to Kiko Pangilinan, Petitoner further wrote several job application letters to JBC ex-officio members including DOJ Sec. Raul M. Gonzalez, who personally talked to and denied all requests and pleas of the former jobless Judge in a pretend world. Gonzalez suffered kidney transplant and heartbreaking election loss in his own province. [Copies of the 2 letters both dated 1 December 2006 are attached as Annexes N, N-1]. 13. Petitioner suffered humiliations, ridicules, dire pains and contempt after he filed dismissed (junked in trash cans) tons of on bended knees appeal letters to JBC Member Justice Raoul Victorino, PBA President JBC Members Conrado J Castro, the President of Philippine Judges Association President Romeo F. Barza and IBP President, Anselmo Cadiz and Board of Governors on 2003-2004, including letter-requests to his 3rd Ponente Alicia Austria-Martinez.+ [Copies of the Appeal-Letters, 2003-20042 letters are attached as Annexes XXX]. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION This petition presents an unusual split of authority. Although the Court almost universally recites the correct standard for applying res judicata, stare decisis, law of the case, bar by former judgment, due process of law (including double jeopardy in criminal and administrative cases regarding lower court Judges), there is a continuing and
- 22 -

irreconcilable inconsistency in the application of that standard. Without review from this Court, the Judicial and Bar Council will continue to twist the language of SC En Banc Resolution dated 12 April 2011 (A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.") beyond its original meaning vis--vis the teachings of Soria vs. Villegas (which allows a 2nd or 3rd Motion For Reconsideration, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1812. November 18, 2004). This petition should be granted because the exclusion ruling of the JBC is in direct conflict with important precedent originating in this Court, and that conflict is symptomatic of broader concerns over how to correctly apply those cases. Additionally, this case presents an ideal vehicle for resolving that conflict.

INTRODUCTION Written in the Stars: Read the Inscription on the walls of the Corridors of Power - to the JBC: Mark my word, they will regret it! LUIS, King of kings of elementals in the universe. Really, its, ominous! Petitioner plagiarizes the immortal words of Senator Eduardo Angara when Senator Kiko Pangilinan broke his gavel in the FPJ vs. PGMA case. Ay! Petitioner shouts the same words of Midas Marquez when the 3 mystic dwarves, LUIS, Armand and Angel flashed the Ultimate Violet and Pink Lights upon his Microphone, a dire proof of the Corona Spinea eternal demise by virtue of the sacred SUMPA ng 3 duende. --Dire OMEN Tupas-Mystic SWA-313 Congress Fire JBC Ex-Officio Member, Cong. Niel C. Tupas, Jr. Representative Iloilo, 5th District Term: 2 House of Representatives, Quezon City Rm. SWA313, local 7934, 4425122
- 23 -

Fire hits Congress building; employees evacuated By Karen Boncocan - INQUIRER.net, Wednesday, July 11th, 2012 Work was disrupted at the House of Representatives Wednesday morning after fire broke out at the third floor of its South Wing Building, prompting security personnel to evacuate employees. Firefighters responded immediately after employees saw smoke billowing from an elevator at around 9 a.m. Dela Cuesta said that as per information from House secretary general Marilyn Barua-Yap nagtrip ang electrical sa elevator sa 3rd floor South Building. All personnel are back to their work stations. Nobody was hurt.
congress=15&id=tupas http://www.congress.gov.ph/members/search.php?

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/227145/fire-hits-congress-building-employees-

evacuated

The Cong. Niel C. Tupas, Jr. 3rd floor South Building mystic fire (divine retribution and warning) did happen just hours after the JBC published the Floro JBC exclusion ruling of July 10, 2012, and barely 2 days after Tupas, in a GMA NewsTV interview stated that Psychotic Judge Floro was excluded from the JBC remaining Long List due to the 2006 Duende decision. Until his last breath, Tupas & Escudero will painfully be haunted by this SWA-313 Ultimate Pink and Violet Lights LUIS fire vis-vis the June 13, 2011 Chiz car accident & marriage woes caused by failed anger management. ARGUMENT
I.

The JBC En Banc July 6 & 9-10, 2012 exclusion ruling is in direct conflict with the Courts jurisprudence barring any attempt to relitigate or re-open, directly or collaterally, a final and executory Judgment (SC En Banc Resolution of 12 April 2011, A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr), in the guise of an indirect attack upon the same via removal of Petitioners sacred nomen from the JBC Long List (22 CJ candidates) for the Panel Interview set on July 24-27, 2012.
- 24 -

A. Soria v Villegas stare decisis permanently sealed the April 12, 2011 SC En Banc Resolution (A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr) GRANTing Petitioner Judge Floros April 1, 2011 Motion for Reinstatement, etc. The Bill of Rights, due process of law and the Rules on Criminal Procedure (applicable to Judges administrative cases, particularly, the double jeopardy bar), prevent the alteration of the 2011 final Decision (by the JBC, per contemptuous attack upon the Judgment when it disqualified Petitioner and expunged his most Holy Name from the Long List of Panel Interview CJ candidates for July 24-27, 2012. Petitioner cites jurisprudence: EN BANC [A.M. No. RTJ-03-1812. November 18, 2004] PABLITO R. SORIA, ET AL. vs. JUDGE FRANKLYN A. VILLEGAS, Regional Trial Court of Pagadian City, Branch 19]. R E S O L U T I O N, DAVIDE, JR., C.J.:
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/nov2004/am_rtj_03_1812.htm

"While indeed a second motion for reconsideration is a prohibited pleading under the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, we have allowed it in certain cases. Besides, in administrative cases involving discipline of judges and court personnel, we have allowed second or even third motions for reconsideration whenever justified by the circumstances. The penalty of dismissal from the service which we have imposed on respondent may seem, indeed, to be harsh. There were administrative cases of more serious nature where we have been less harsh. (Zarate vs. Judge Balderian, (A.M. No. MTJ-00-1261, 3 April 2000; 386 Phil. 1); xxx. WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the Second Motion for Reconsideration of respondent is hereby given due course, and is partly granted. The penalty of dismissal from the service imposed on respondent is hereby REDUCED to suspension. SO ORDERED."
- 25 -

On July 12, 2007, the Per Curiam Resolution was issued in the duende-Psychosis cases, signed by Nazario and all the Justices: "The Court had already thoroughly studied the present case. Likewise, it had meticulously reviewed each and every evidence on record when it rendered its 31 March 2006 Decision and 11 August 2006 Resolution. Seeing that Judge Floro failed to present, and continuously fails to present, any meritorious argument or substantial evidence in support of the various pleadings he has filed thereafter, We were constrained to deny them. In this Resolution, We wish to remind Judge Floro that the Court cannot be swayed to modify or reverse its Decision and various Resolutions by inundating the ponente with numerous pleadings avowing ungodly reprisal as well as personal letters/telephone calls seeking audience with the latter, if, as in this case, they are only in furtherance of repeating issues and arguments already passed upon by the Court En Bancs earlier Decision and Resolution. Otherwise stated, only meritorious arguments and substantial evidence can convince Us to modify or reverse our previous ruling."
[http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2007/july2007/RTJ-99-1460.htm]

The Carpio High Tribunal and even its predecessors CoronaPuno-Panganiban-Davide, Jr. Courts of InJustice did not change the ancient jurisprudence which sets the parameters in the discipline or even dismissal of Judges that, Concededly, administrative proceedings are not strictly bound by formal rules on evidence. However, the liberality of procedure in administrative actions is still subject to limitations imposed by the fundamental requirements of due process. Xxx. The general rules in regard to admissibility in evidence in criminal trials apply. (35 GSIS v. CA, 296 SCRA 514 [1998], citing Ang Tibay v. CIR, supra., citing Consolidated Edison Co.v.National Labor Relations Board, 59 S. Ct. 206, 83 Law ed. No. 4, Adv. Opp., p. 31). In this regard, Petitioner, Judge Floro's last pleading of April 4, 2008, Blue Madonna Motion (for Enthronement-Consecration of MaryEucharist-Black Nazarene) was ordered expunged by the Court from the records on June 3, 2008, exactly 25 years or a quarter of century from the night the 3 holy Archangels, LUIS, Armand and Angel appeared to Petitoners brother Robert V. Floro.

- 26 -

Obeying the mandate of the July 12, 2007, Per Curiam Resolution that "Otherwise stated, only meritorious arguments and substantial evidence can convince Us to modify or reverse our previous ruling", Petitioner Judge Floro filed the April 1, 2011 Supplemental Omnibus Motions for Reinstatement, etc. submitting new grounds (supervening events or rather novel-mystic twists and turns, which were never seen by the High Tribunal and the Filipino nation since Chief Justice John Jay was appointed 1st US SC Chief Justice). The Court witnessed for the first time the sparkling Light of Divine Retribution. The Corona Spinea Court fully deliberated and the Clerk of Court promulgated on April 12, 2011, the SC Pink En Banc Resolution which did NOTE and GRANT not just a part but 100% of the April 1, 2011 Supplemental Omnibus Motions of filed by Petitioner Judge Floro. First, the Court did GRANT Petitioner Judge Floros -Supplemental Omnibus Motion I. To Admit Transcendental Supplemental Formal Offer of Evidence Re: a) Corpores of JBC ex-officio member, J. Conrado Castro+, Leo Dacera III+, Ateneo Law School Class 1982, classmate of Petitioner and lead counsel of the Ampatuan massacre case, and Rod Nazario+, husband of Ponente Minita Viray Chico-Nazario, including the prophesied on January 11, 2011 (by Petitioner in 4 forums) - SendaiThoku Earthquake; b) the 32 Judge Floro Mystic Visions and Apparitions: 3-1308 to 3-1811 - LUIS, Armand and Angel: Servants of Mary, Members of Marys Army, Crusaders-Knights of the Black Nazarene and Protectors of the Holy Eucharist against Atheism, Evil, and Satans Instruments, c) The LUISs space ships, flying saucers, rocket ships, and UFOs 38 Mystic Travels of Judge Floro in LUIS Kingdom at Osaka, Japan and Jupiter, 2nd quarter of 2007- July 27, 2010, and d) the 55 living persons( testimonies), who saw, for not less than 7 minutes, the outer space, mystic and divine Lux in Domino, including 13 living persons who saw for not less than 7 minutes the Black Nazarene, Risen Christ, Just Heaven and Holy Cross in Judge Floros palms: Judge Florentino Floro is blessed by the Black Nazarene with the only handspalms in world-universe history that eternally display these mysticDivine Lights - red, white, yellow ... lights ... all visible to any human eye since September 10, 2010-March 26, 2011; as Global Annihilator, Prophet of prophets, Visionary of visionaries and Angel of Death, Judge Floro, LUIS, Armand and Angel defeat-annihilate atheism and bornagain Christians who destroy "Poons" or Catholic Images, for the Protection of the Holy Eucharist -

- 27 -

To Prove that LUIS, the King of kings of Elementals is the most powerful in the entire universe, the sole possessor of the Mystic, Divine and Outer space Ultimate Violet and Pink Lights and that Judge Florentino Floro is Prophet of prophets, Global Annihilator, Pinagpala, Powerful, & Angel of Death, Visionary of visionaries, inter alia. Second, the Court did GRANT Judge Floros - Supplemental Omnibus Motion II. Accordingly, to Correct-Amend-Revise the Cursed (under Pslams 109/73) Decision and Resolutions (in these cases) dated 31 March 2006 Decision and 11 August 2006 and 12 July 2007, respectively, to this effect: to Rectify, inter alia, the half-truths and falsities: a) that Judge Floro consults dwarves, LUIS, Armand and Angel in writing decisions, b) that Judge Floro is afflicted with psychosis, and c) that Judge Floro delayed these cases for 3 years, inter alia, and Third, the Court did GRANT Judge Floros - Supplemental Omnibus Motion III. Conditionally, to alternatively Grant this Resignation-Retirement Offer of Judge Floro, after Full Supreme Court Reinstatement - With Prayer For Early Resolution. In GRANTing Petitioner, Judge Floros Appeal for Reinstatement, inter alia, the Court effected-mandated the landmark reversal, setting aside and annulment of the March 31, 2006 75-pages Psychosis Judgment. As a result, the Court reversed the conviction and made null and void Petitioner Judge Floros 2006 Psychosis Dismissal from service finding, including the imposed gross ignorance of the law fine of P 40,000. The Courts GRANT final Resolution also effectively acquitted Petitioner Judge Floro from the 13 and all other charges, inter alia, thereby effectively putting him clean (back on July 19, 1999, a day before the July 20, 1999 cursed suspension). To repeat, Petitioner Judge Floro was, with finality adjudged acquitted and remained innocent as if no charge ever existed or had been filed.

- 28 -

Odd and quirky, is the fact that there is no private complainant in the Psychosis-Duende case, and no oppositor or any complainant ever did file an Intervention, Motion for Reconsideration or Appeal against the GRANT April 12, 2011 SC En Banc Pink Resolution. The Court, on July 12, 2007, ruled: Basic is the rule in our judicial system that litigations must end and terminate at some point, and in the oft-quoted case of Li Kim Tho v. Sanchez,[12] this Court had explained that Litigation must end and terminate sometime and somewhere, and it is essential to an effective and efficient administration of justice that once a judgment has become final, the winning party be not, through a mere subterfuge, deprived of the fruits of the verdict. Courts must therefore guard against any scheme calculated to bring about that result. Constituted as they are to put an end to controversies, courts should frown upon any attempt to prolong them. [http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2007/july2007/RTJ-991460.htm] For these reasons, LUIS and Petitioner did ask the Court of Last Resort to issue a Mandamus Protection Order and Writ of Amparo and Habeas Data to direct these Penoy journalists to publish an erratum on all front pages, following the FALLO of the April 12, 2011 GRANT SC En Banc Pink Resolution, to wit: To Rectify, inter alia, the half-truths and falsities: a) that Judge Floro consults dwarves, LUIS, Armand and Angel in writing decisions, b) that Judge Floro is afflicted with psychosis, and c) that Judge Floro delayed these cases for 3 years, inter alia, xxx. But until this date, Philippine broadcast and printe media miserably failed to clean the most Holy Names of Petitioner/3 Duendes. "We've (LUIS, Armand and Angel) been living with the Curse & Spell Light for almost 14 years... it's become our Holy Grail", LUIS announced." This hunt for the SC Pink GRANT Resolution of April 12, 2011 vis-a-vis the GRANT-GIFT of the Ultimate PINK Light (which is trillion times more potent that the universe's most powerful Ultimate Violet Light inside the eyes and palms of and upon our instrument Judge Florentino Floro, the Angel of Death, on his 58th birthday on November 5 2011), is like fishing

- 29 -

in an ancient way instead of using modern tools you are removing the water from the pond it might look tedious but it is the only way, at the end of the day, when you have removed all the water from the pond to find the smallest fish" LUIS warned.
II.

Petitioner repeatedly predicted not only the appointments of Renato C. Corona as SC Associate Justice, and as Chief Justice, but the Spinea Corona (188 Impeachment) vis-a-vis the rotten Corona golden throne, per 4 fake Crown pictures and several Court pleadings before his Gone with the wind, and forever! Cristina fairy tale of fate (tragic) The End.
In the February 4, 2010 CJ Verified Application, and succeeding

Court pleadings, Petitioner wrote in no uncertain terms and lingo, prophecy on the twin fates of Corona & Gloria: May Gloria pa ba ba, kung wala nang Corona? Petitioner echoed his September 2, 2007 HK Standard prophecy on PGMA's downfall on November 5-15, 2011 which impeccably coincided with her hurting (he even foretold on January 9, 1999 vis-a-vis the more than 5 prefatory dire omens of her fall). Suffice it to say that, when Petitioner predicted on 2003 a new FPJ de jure President on 2004, Gloria remained a puppet or de facto ruler. Media and several legal luminaries labeled Corona as a fake CJ. In stealing the highest judicial post, Spinea remained, like Gloria, to have continuously placed on his crown, a kalabasa, bandera Espanola and bawang wig (which Judge Floro beautifully did predict-depict in the 4 pictures (as CODES) interspersed after page 1 hereof: CJ Corona spinea, a man wearing a cursed Crown without any dignity. [DOWNLOAD: First Friday, February 3, 2012, Verified Supplemental Omnibus Motions, 131 pages, "OCAD vs. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.", A.M. NO. RTJ-99-1460 http://www.scribd.com/doc/80446796 https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx? cid=E76BFFF86F9A213F&resid=E76BFFF86F9A213F!309]

- 30 -

III.

Grounds and Extraordinary Merits of Petitioners NominationApplication for the post of Chief Justice.

Petitioner submitted the following evidence to the JBC in support of his Application and Nomination, thusly: Xxx. a) Judge Floro is a Visionary of visionaries and Prophet of prophets. He has accurately predicted in his 1996 Angel of Death and other editions, more than 800 dire prophecies with impeccability. Since 2008, he had been bestowed more than 46 visions and apparitions of the Black Nazarene, Virgin Mary and the Holy Eucharist, inter alia, with vivid images and unequivocal messages duly filed with this Court of last resort. b) Judge Floro accurately predicted in writing the downfall of Erap, carotic surgery of Davide, Jr. and lung cancer death of Diego Gutierrez, spouse of SC Justice Angelina Sandoval-Gutierrez, the verbal and written predictions of the SC appointments of Justices Corona, De Leon, Jr., Capio-Morales, Callejo, Sr., Teresita de Castro (in Wikipedia), Brion, del Castillo (by phone to Atty. Gregorio M. Batiller, Jr.), including Chief Justice Punos appointment against Quisumbing and Miriam Defensor-Santiago, by 3 hours card reading with Jasmin Mateo & Marilyn Puno Santiago, SC Conference hall. c) Judge Floro predicted the September 23-24, 2009 dire tragedy - (ROPE) Rod Nazario, Ondoy, Pepeng and Global Millennium Earthquakes, World Record Extra-judicial Killings of 34 journalists in Ampatuan Massacre, including its lead counsel, Leo Dacera III, of cursed Ateneo Law School Class 1982 when the Court expunged from the Records his Motions to Enthrone the Eucharist and Mary in the 5 mystic fires courts he predicted, including the enthronement of Minita Viray Chico-Narario. d) Judge Floro holds the Ateneo Law School 1975-1985 unbroken record (not duplicated by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians), of

- 31 -

91% in criminal law review under Dean Antonio L. Gregorio, the No. 1 terror professor Ateneo ever had); he placed 12th in the 1983 Philippine Bar Examination, with a very high bar rating of 87.55% in one of the hardest examination in Philippine history (only 21.3% passed; 65% of both Ateneo and University of the Philippines College of Law students failed because of the taxation bar subject). d) This rating is higher than that of SC Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio, all JBC regular and ex-officio Members and most of the remaining 22 CJ candidates. Judge Floro became immortal in world history on April 7, 2006.

IV.

Petitioner predicted since 1999, the November 5-15, 2011 physical hurting and downfall of PGMA.
Petitioner did call the attention of the JBC on the following:

Florentino and the three dwarves - Saturday, September 02, 2006 Florentino says he predicted Joseph "Erap" Estrada's presidential downfall and prayed that present incumbent Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would survive her endless political battles. Looking ahead, he reckons Arroyo's power will end soon and the nation will suffer as a result. Ang Sumpa ng 3 Duende writes the inseparable destiny and fate of Corona-Gloria: 2 most beautiful minds - greed, anger, hatred, vendetta, ambition, hypocrisy, envy, anxiety, fear and self-destruction the ingredients of Jean-Paul Charles Aymard Sartres 1944 No Exit. l'enfer, c'est les autres ("Hell is other people"): Erap never imagined that his very own appointees would jail him. When Petitioner predicted De Leon, Jr.s appointment per request of Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr., the Ateneo Law School legal philosophy teacher (who laughed and laughed at Petitioner in 1996 - Dulcinea, Greenbelt chance meet, when the Duende Judge said, See you in the Supreme Court!) ridiculed Erap, as televised in Channel 2 News. Sabino tasted the last bite of his McDo Burger and for 12 hours, Petitioner gazed upon his operating table surgery pains.

- 32 -

Bingo! PGMA does not hold the necks of Justices, when ambitions are there roaming around like the elfs. [http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp? pp_cat=30&art_id=26375&sid=9641493&con_type=3] Petitioner alerted the JBC regarding the gross incompetence of many of its members and even personnel/secretariat to wit: Comparative Analysis [Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. graduated Valedictorian at the Sibonga Elementary School (19331940) and Salutatorian at the Cebu Provincial High School (19401941). He earned his Associate of Arts and his law degree with cum laude from the University of Visayas (19481952). ***He passed the Bar Examinations in 1953 with a fair rating of 83.45%. In the 1953 Bar Exams, Leonardo A. Amores, UM got 94.05% as 1 st placer, while the 10th placer is Ernesto D. Tobias UP is 92.05%; hence, Hermosisima, Jr.s grade, during the birth of Judge Floro on November 5, 1953, is at the very least, around Sea Level, using Ateneo Prof. Danton Remotoss street food lingo]. [The 3 stooges of the Bar Exams, meaning 3 kalabasa, kamote at itlog received the following Bar IQs below Sea Level: Reynato S. Puno got 76% Miriam Santiago got 77% Hilario G. Davide, Jr. got about 79%]. Nakakahiya! Paano sila naupo sa pwesto? Chief Justice Kamote, Senator Kalabasa and JBC Chair Iglot! They should go back to Lyceum Law School (of Aurora Lagman) or appoint Prof. Danton Remoto as their mentor in English Carabao subject.] How then, did these 3 Saints amass fortunes, mansions, stocks, and mounts of SALNs? Let the 3 Duendes judge them during their last breaths, amid lingering illnesses, slow and painful-horrible deaths, based on the spectacular kamatayans of his wife, her son and his father & 2 siblings, respectively.]

[Petitioner Judge Florentino Floro holds the Ateneo Law School 1975-1985 unbroken record (not duplicated by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians), of 91% in criminal law review under Dean
- 33 -

Antonio L. Gregorio, the No. 1 terror professor Ateneo ever had); he placed 12th in the 1983 Philippine Bar Examination, with a very high bar rating of 87.55% in one of the hardest examination in Philippine history (96% in Labor Law; only 20.3% passed; 80% of both Ateneo and University of the Philippines College of Law students failed because of the taxation bar subject). Judge Floros rating is much higher than that of Chief Justice Antonio T. Carpio. Judge Floro became immortal in world history on April 7, 2006]. [More importantly, Petitioner Judge Floros Mt. Fujiyama Peak Sea Level Grades are much higher than the below Sea Level Bar Ratings of his classmates Mayor-Congressman Jerry P. Trenas, Mayor Recom Echiverri, Nimfa Cuesta- Vilches+, DOJ State Counsel Ricardo Paras III, OGCC Head Elpido Vega, SEC Commissioner Manny Gaite, Ampatuan Massacre Lead Counsel Leo Dacera III+, Erap-Gloria Counsel Jay Flaminiano, BIR Commissioner Rene Banez, Judge Voltaire Rosales+, CTA Justice Lovell Bautista, and the other crabs].
[Petitioner Judge Florentino Floro also earned A in Chemistry, under Mr. Balalta, A in Math II, under Ms. Chan, A in poetry under Ms. Nunes, B+ in physics under Fr. Waterbury, with higher grades in New and Old Testament, Liturgy, etc. than his 4 years Ateneo de Manila University, A.B. Pre-Divinity classmate, Provincial Fr. Romeo Archie Intengan, S.J., 1971-1974].
[Antonio T. Carpio, UP 85.7%, 1975 Bar Exams] http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/bar/bar%20topnotchers/1973-1976.php [Bienvenido L. Reyes obtained a grade of 81.6% in the 1971 Bar exams] [Estela Perlas-Bernabe earned her law degree from the Ateneo Law School, passed the bar examination in 1977 with a bar rating of 85.156%.] [Francis Joseph Chiz G. Escudero earned his Bachelor of Laws, U.P. College of Law, 1989-1993] Bar rating, secret. [DOJ Sec. JBC Ex-Officio Member, Leila M. De-Lima-Bohol, SBC, 86.26% 1985 Bar Exams] [Aurora Santiago-Lagman obtained her law degree from the Lyceum of the Philippines started her career as a lawyer in the government in August 1978 at the then Citizens Legal Assistance Office, now Public Attorneys Office, Department of Justice.] Bar rating, secret.
- 34 -

[Jose V. Mejia proceeded to take up law also at the Ateneo de Manila School of Law and graduated in 1985. After passing the bar in 1986, he briefly joined the Sepidoza Laogan Law Offices and then transferred to the Office of then Sen. Rene Saguisag as Senior Technical Consultant.] Bar rating, secret. [Maria Milagros N. Fernan-Cayosa finished Doctor of Jurisprudence at the Ateneo de Manila University (1994)] Bar rating, secret. [Jose Midas P. Marquez was admitted as member of the Philippine Bar in March 1994, he is a product of the De La Salle University Grade School, and Ateneo de Manila University- High School Class in 1983, AB Economics in 1987 and Juris Doctor in 1993.] Bar rating, secret. [Enriqueta Esguerra Vidal Clerk of Court JBC Ex-Officio Secretary finished her Bachelor of Laws graduating cum laude and salutatorian from the University of Santo Tomas.] Bar rating, secret. [Only 11 of the 22 jurists who rose to become Chief Justice of the Supreme Court were bar placers, starting with Jose Yulo (3rd in 1913), followed by Ricardo Paras (2nd in 1913), then by Cesar Bengzon (2nd in 1919), then by Roberto Concepcion (1st in 1924), then by Querube Makalintal (7th in 1933) then by Enrique Fernando (13th in 1938), then by Ramon Aquino (6th in 1939), then by Claudio Teehankee, Sr. (1st in 1940), then by Pedro Yap (1st in November 1946), then by Andres Narvasa (2nd in 1951) and finally by Artemio Panganiban (6th in 1960). However, the first four chief magistrates (Cayetano Arellano, Victorino Mapa, Manuel Araullo and Ramon Avancena) became lawyers (all after graduating from the UST Faculty of Civil Law) before the establishment of the Bar Exams in 1901 while the fifth head of the judiciary (Jose Abad Santos) graduated from a foreign law school and was admitted to the Philippine bar in 1911. 6 Chief Justices did not place in the Bar Exams: Manuel Moran (the father of Philippine remedial law), Fred Ruiz Castro (the father of the Integrated Bar

- 35 -

of the Philippines), Felix Makasiar, Marcelo Fernan, Hilario Davide and Reynato Puno).] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Bar_Examination Petitioner, on bended knees, appealed to the JBC: Sa lahat ng mga ito, nais kong makasama Ako sa Listahan ng Panel Inverview dahil ang April 12, 2011 SC Final and Executory En Banc Resolution ay GRANTed and aking April 1, 2011 Motion For Reinstatement and to Reverse, Nullify and Annul the cursed 75-page Minita Virary Chico-Nazario Duende-Psychosis Judgment of March 31, 2006 (Annexes A and B hereof). Iyon pong P 40,000 fine JBC disqualification ko ay awtomatikong tanggal na. Dahil sa walang complainant at walang nagappeal at DOUBLE JEOPARDY constitutional bar, PINAL na po iyan. Walang relasyon, kung ang isang JBC member ay magiging o hindi magiging Presidente, etc., etc., etc. There is no more impediment or disqualification on my being included in the Panel Interview. I am more qualified than any and all of the candidates, for the reasons abovesubmitted.
V.

Petitioner accuses JBC regular member, Maria Milagros N. Fernan-Cayosa and JBC Executive Officer Atty. Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite of a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence and c) gross disregard of JBC-009 & the 1987 Constitition. They should be disciplined and/or removed from service because of palpable and culpable violations the Constitution and of R.A. 6713, inter alia. Cayosa announced on TV that she would review the resume of CJ candidates, as basis for inclusion in the JBC Long List. On the other hand, Capacite, by virtue of her office, should have carefully studied the Personal Data Sheets of the 22 candidates. Both miserably failed. These JBC member/executive officers even included in the 22- CJ List, retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (a SC Court 2004 annulment J. Nazario Decision pronounced shackled, sick man-psychotic and a sex pervertphilanderer, who endured and suffered through his turbulent and loveless marriage to his wife for twenty-two (22) years, and who was repeatedly rejected by the JBC in his CA Applications before retirement), who has and had no integrity, probity and independence.
Petitioner personally met retired Malolos City RTC Judge

Manuel Siaynco or Manuel de Jesus Siayngco about 2 times: a) in his court

- 36 -

sala at Br. 6, RTC, Malolos and b) at South Supermarket, Malolos City. In the annulment case he filed, the Court ruled with finality: This is a petition for review on certiorari of the decision of the Court of Appeals promulgated on 01 July 2003, reversing the decision of the RTC, Branch 102, Quezon City, dated 31 January 2001, which dismissed the petition for declaration of nullity of marriage filed by respondent herein Judge Manuel Siayngco ("respondent Manuel"). In her Answer, petitioner Juanita alleged that respondent Manuel is still living with her at their conjugal home in Malolos, Bulacan; that he invented malicious stories against her so that he could be free to marry his paramour; In her defense, petitioner Juanita denied respondent Manuels allegations. She insisted that they were a normal couple who had their own share of fights; that they were happily married until respondent Manuel started having extra-marital affairs which he had admitted to her. She talked about her spouse, "My husband is kind, a good provider, cool, intelligent but a liar, masamang magalit at gastador. In spite of what he has done to me, I take care of him whenever he is sick. He is having extra marital affairs because he wants to have a child. I believe that our biggest problem is not having a child. It is his obsession to have a child with his girl now. He started his relationship with this girl in 1994. I even saw them together in the car. I think that it was the girl who encouraged him to file the petition." She feels that the problems in the relationship is "paulit-ulit," but, that she still is willing to pursue it. Overall, she feels that he is a good spouse and that he is not really psychologically incapacitated. He apparently told her, "You and Jeremy should give me a chance to have a new family." She answered and said, "Ikaw tinuruan mo akong to fight for my right. Ipaglalaban ko ang marriage natin. What emerges from the psychological report of Dr. Garcia as well as from the testimonies of the parties and their witnesses is that the only essential marital obligation which respondent Manuel was not able to fulfill, if any, is the obligation of fidelity. Sexual infidelity, per se, however, does not constitute psychological incapacity within the contemplation of the Family Code. It must be shown that respondent Manuels unfaithfulness is a manifestation of a disordered personality which makes him completely unable to discharge the essential obligations of the marital state and not merely due to his ardent wish to have a child of his own flesh and blood. In herein case, respondent Manuel has admitted that: "I had [extramarital] affairs because I wanted to have a child at that particular point." On the contrary, the report clearly shows that the root cause of petitioner Juanitas behavior is traceable not from the inception of their marriage as required by law but from her experiences during the marriage, e.g., her inlaws disapproval of her as they wanted their son to enter the priesthood, her husbands philandering, admitted no less by him, and her inability to conceive. Thus, from the totality of the evidence adduced by both parties, we have been allowed a window into the Siayngcoss life and have perceived therefrom a simple case of a married couple drifting apart, becoming
- 37 -

strangers to each other, with the husband consequently falling out of love and wanting a way out. We are not downplaying the frustration and misery respondent Manuel might be experiencing in being shackled, so to speak, to a marriage that is no longer working. Regrettably, there are situations like this one, where neither law nor society can provide the specific answers to every individual problem. WHEREFORE, the petition for review is hereby GRANTED. The Decision dated 01 July 2003 of the Court of Appeals is hereby REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The Decision dated 31 January 2001 of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 102 is reinstated and given full force and effect.
[http://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/oct2004/gr_158896_2004.html G.R. NO. 158896 October 27, 2004 JUANITA CARATING-SIAYNGCO, petitioner, vs. MANUEL SIAYNGCO, respondent. CHICO-NAZARIO, J.]

Petitioner carefully (repeatedly) observed the daily office situation in the JBC, inter alia, in his more than 60 personal visits kay Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. since 1997, July 22, 1999 to July 10, 2006, the last. Since the invention of Solitaire and Internet, Petitioner had seen several JBC employees playing this card game during office hours. Justice Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. knows this. His chief of staff Vic Dexits day-to-day obsession is Internet Solitaire until he flew and migrated to the land of fruits and nuts. Bakit hindi na nila tigilan itong 3 Duende. Gawin nila ang kanilang mga trabaho! Open Google search engine, type the name of each of the 22 candidates before submitting their Long List names to the JBC En Banc. Ilan and tauhan ni Cayosa at Capacity? Hindi ba duty iyan nilang 2 sampu ng kanilang mga tauhan ayon sa Code of Conduct for SC Court personnel at R.A. 6713? E, itong si Cayosa, nagpapaporma pa sa GMA NewsTV at aral na aral daw siya bago niya at ng JBC En Banc pipiliin ang mapapasama sa JBC Long List! If only Cayosa and Capacite, would direct their staff to stop and desist from playing Solitaire and other games during office hours, that is, kung na-type lang nila in Google search engine the name Judge Manuel Siaynco, they need not review his Personal Data Sheet. Lalabas kaagad itong Annulment Judgment of Poor Justice Nazario.

- 38 -

Petitioner graciously borrows, with attribution from Ateneo de Manila University professor, TV5 anchor Danton Remoto (Remoto Control) these descriptive words for Cayosa & Capacite: IQ below sea level. These incompetent JBC member & officer are therefore, demonstrated by Petitioner to have committed a) gross ignorance of the law, b) gross incompetence and c) gross disregard of JBC-009 & 1987 Constitition. They should be disciplined and/or removed from service because of palpable and culpable violations the Constitution and of R.A. 6713, inter alia. How can the Filipino nation trust the JBC? Sirang-sira na itong JBC even during the time of Justice Campos who, for 20 minutes did curse JBC member, Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison, accusing her of being a conduit of politicians. Sino pa ba ang magtitiwala dito sa JBC, kung isasali nila itong may toyo, may topak at sayad na si Judge Manuel Siayngco (na inadmit na may babae siya at pilit na gusting magka-anak doon)? Sasabihin nila, e mag-file kayo ng opposition. Pero, i-interviewhin siya ng JBC at televised pa ito. Alam nyo Cayosa at Capacite, sana maniwala na kayong 2 sa Karma, open-read the Bible, and you will then stop from blaming the 3 dwarves (accusing Petitioner Judge Floro of Psychosis and calling him a dismissed Judge): balik sa inyong 2 ang Sumpa! Let what happened to Marcelo Fernan (after Petitioner was rejected by the Senate President to be granted personal audience) be a stern warning to Cayosa and the TupasCongress fire should alert Cayosa and JBC staff, to cease and desist from playing Solitaire during office hours. Petitoner further alerts the respondent JBC, to wit: the physical office of Cayosa is cursed. It was occupied by JBC member Conrado J Castro, who was physically intercepted and abducted by the 24 Archangels of Petitioner, LUIS, Armand and Angel (on Super Moon of March 19, 2011). J Castro who suffered a smashing death at Greenhills, is the same PBA President who junked in his JBC garbage can tons of letters and appeals of Petitioner, who was even personally interviewed by Castro. This happened after the PJA and IBP, inter alia, committed a grave injustice

- 39 -

against a poor jobless Judge in a pretend world. All of them, including Ateneo Law School ALAFI Chair Renato C. Corona itinapon sa basurahan ang 2004 Appeals ng isang kawawang Mahistrado na wala namang kasalanan! Cayosa & Capacite, like the IBP President Anselmo Cadiz, PJA President Romeo F. Barza, Ateneo Law Schiool ALAFI Corona, JBC Member Justice Raoul Victorino & Alicia Austria-Martinez (who retired due to illness) are all hypocrites, who never know and knew the essence of fairness and kindness, the 2 ingredients of Justice. They live in the land of fruits and nuts, as conduits of politician to serve their foolish ambitions. Ateneo Law School never lectured to Cayosa, the essence of St. Ignatius Ratio Studiorum and the Spiritual Exercises. Basta na lang niya binasura ang Application ni Judge Floro, at hindi man lang binasa ang tungkol kay Judge Manuel Siayngco. Nakakahiya! Just imagine, televised pa naman ito. And this sick man wants to lead the Judiciary? Atty. Rico Paol in his July 13, 2012 complaint-opposition states: We cannot cherry-pick our morality. The same lofty legal and moral standards that were applied in unseating a Chief Justice should likewise be bases in naming a new one; That, or irreversibly erode the faith and confidence of our countrymenthe bedrock of credibility and respectability upon which stands any and all democratic institutionsin the Judiciary. [http://www.philstar.com/nation/article.aspx? publicationsubcategoryid=200&articleid=827117 Corona lawyer to JBC: De Lima has no integrity By Christina Mendez Home July 13, 2012 04:09 PM] Petitoner further alerts this Court , on a desperate attempt by the same IBP (who threw in the waste can Petitioner Judge Floros 2004 Appeal) to mind control the JBC selection process and the forthcoming JBC final voting-recommendation of the Court. In the name of hypocrisy, the IBP, who cannot even change the SWS Judicial corruption findings, would now, convene to cook another dish of Injustice, inside the heartless persona of Victorino and Martinez:

- 40 -

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/229461/ibp-next-chief-justice-should-not-beaquino%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%98puppet%E2%80%99 IBP: Next Chief Justice should not be Aquinos puppet By Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net Monday, July 16th, 2012 MANILA, Philippines Legal experts on Monday stressed on the need for a Chief Justice that is not a puppet of the President. Once a puppet, always a puppet, New Era College of Law Dean Abraham Espejo said during the IBP Forum on defining the best candidate for the next Chief Justice. IBP stands for Integrated Bar of the Philippines, a national organization of lawyers. Dean of Philippine Christian University College of Law retired Sandiganbayan Justice Raoul Victorino said President Benigno Aquino III must not only hold true to constitutional mandate in making selection, but should also choose one of resolute principles. The next CJ must be unwavering in defending the independence of judiciary, Raoul Victorino said. The forum, attended by retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Alicia Austria-Martinez and other deans of various law schools, was held a week before the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) conducts public interview of candidates for the top Supreme Court position. The JBC has been encouraging the public to participate in choosing the next Chief Justice. It was also the first time that the JBC interview will be covered live by the media. http://businessmirror.com.ph/home/regions/29943-ibp-meets-toset-rules-for-short-list-of-chief-justice-candidates IBP meets to set rules for short list of Chief Justice candidates SUNDAY, 15 JULY 2012 19:09 JOEL SAN JUAN LEGAL luminaries are expected to gather on Monday in a forum arranged by the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) to come up with proposed criteria and standards for consideration by the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) of a short list of nominees for the Chief Justice post left vacant by the impeachment of former Chief Justice Renato Corona. IBP National President Roan Libarios said expected to participate in the high-level forum are retired justices of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, as well as deans of different law schools. The consultation will be held at the JBL Reyes Hall, IBP Building in Ortigas, Pasig City. The IBP is the mandatory organization of lawyers in the country with the purpose created in 1970 to elevate the standards of the legal profession, to improve the administration of justice, and to enable the bar discharge its public responsibility more effectively.

- 41 -

*****On January 25, 2005, and on December 10, 2006, Philippines Social Weather Stations released the results of its two surveys on corruption in the judiciary; it published that: a) like 1995, 1/4 of lawyers said many/very many judges are corrupt. But (49%) stated that a judges received bribes, just 8% of lawyers admitted they reported the bribery, because they could not prove it. [Tables 8-9]; judges, however, said, just 7% call many/very many judges as corrupt[Tables 10-11];b) "Judges see some corruption; proportions who said - many/very many corrupt judges or justices: 17% in reference to RTC judges, 14% to MTC judges, 12% to Court of Appeals justices, 4% i to Shari'a Court judges, 4% to Sandiganbayan justices and 2% in reference to Supreme Court justices [Table 15]. On July 17, 2012, about 9:40 a.m. (GMA News TV Interview), IBP general counsel Pacifica A. Agabin, who virtually shows dementia or second childhood after failing in his previous SC Associate Justice JBC Applications, told the nation that kung sino-sino na lang ang mga sumasali pati ba itong huwes na nadismiss ! Sino ba itong si tandang kulubang Agabin, ano ang K niya? Based on this profile and bio-data, he is nobody, who rose from the ranks of professors because of his kakulitan. Ano ang ibubuga niya kung pagbabasehan ang Bar Rating at academic records vis--vis Petitioner? Wala, e ni hindi nakaporma yan, kasi, dada ng dada, ni hindi man lang binabasa ang mga TSN at SC records of Petitioner! Using the criminal law weapon of sting versus libel, LUIS, the King of kings of elementals, hereby flashes his Ultimate Violet Lights into the vessels and internal organs of Agabin: Mark my word, you will regret it, like Nazario! Petitioner furthmore alerts the Court on how destructive Cayosas TV statements on the dignity and Holy Name of Petitioner. Dahil kay Cayosa, pati itong si tandang kulubang Agabin, na virus na rin! It is all about anger management! Marcelo "Celing" Briones Fernn (October 24, 1927) died in extreme pain, and slowly, on July 11, 1999, 9 Novena Corona days, before Petitioner was suspended by Flerida Ruth-Romero because of

- 42 -

massive stroke patient Alfredo L. Benipayos right hand signature. Fernan resigned as Chief Justice in 1991 to run as president of the country. He later accepted the offer of House Speaker Ramon Mitra as his vice presidential candidate of the LDP Party. In the 1992 elections, he however lost to actor and Senator Joseph Estrada. His Uncle, Manuel Briones, was also a Supreme Court justice from 19451949. Like Fernan, Briones also ran and lost for the Vice-Presidency in 1949. Petitioner furthmore alerts the Court on the mystic fire that destroyed JBC member Aurora Lagmans RTC Malolos sala vis--vis the supreme curse upon the very physical office she now stays at daily. Her office had been occupied by Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison, the mastermind of Petitioners 14 years jobless Judge in pretend world suffering. Her successor, JBC Member Raoul Victorino lost his wife 6 days after Justice Nazarios August 11, 2006 Denial Resolution of Petitioners first appeal. Inside the JBC and Supreme Court offices, a circulating Curse & Spell of the 3 mystic dwarves thrives, an outerspace virus from the 24 Archangels, led by St. Michael, Prince of Angels, holding a flaming sword, St. Raphael, St. Gabriel and 9 Choirs of Angels, ready to flash the Lights into the heartless corpores of the Magistrates, to wit: Aftermath and unusual circumstances "At the same time, a series of unfortunate incidents have befallen the supreme court justices or their families, including serious illnesses and car accidents," the American Bar Association (ABA), an 1878 voluntary bar association of 410,000 members, lawyers and law students, with national headquarters in Chicago, Illinois, with a significant branch office in Washington, D.C., in its Jounal, said. "Floro says the person to blame for the mishaps is one of the elves, 'Luis,' a 'King of kings' who is an avenger. He told the newspaper that the elves help him predict the future, but he has

- 43 -

never consulted them when issuing judicial decisions," the ABA added. In an interview, on August, 2006, by The Standard, Hong Kong's first English and free newspaper, the main local competitor of the South China Morning Post, journalist Sam Chambers met Judge Floro at the famous Hobbit Bar on Mabini St, in Malate, Manila, amid a bottle of Australian shiraz. "One such blogger described Florentino as a Filipino X-Man for his efforts to rid the country's judiciary of corruption. However, Florentino admits to having a darker mission, avenging those who corrupt the legal system. This has led him to be dubbed an angel of death, a description he does not dispute," wrote Chambers of The Standard. "Eight Justices who Florentino has deemed corrupt have all been struck with serious illnesses, three of them dying. He has, he confesses, been psychically "inflicting illnesses" upon his tormentors, even going so far as to ensure one of them gave birth to a child with epilepsy," Chambers added. In a special interview, on August, 2007, by The Wall Street Journal, an English-language international daily newspaper published by Dow Jones & Company (acquired by News Corp) in New York City with a worldwide daily circulation of more than 2 million, and with approximately 931,000 paying online subscribers, as of 2007, journalist James Hookway, on September 17, 2007, wrote that "Mr. Floro, 54 years old, has become a media celebrity; he is now wielding his new clout to campaign for the return of his job -- and exact vengeance on the Supreme Court of the Philippines." Mr. Hookway explained that Judge Floro become a regular on Philippine television. "They say your show will be taken off the air if you don't feature me more often, Mr. Floro's told one interviewer; even so, a series of dire incidents appear to have the nation's top jurists rattled; according to local newspaper reports, a mysterious fire destroyed the high court's crest in its session hall on
- 44 -

January 16, 2007, and a number of members of the court and their close family members have developed serious illnesses or have fallen victim to car accidents," Mr. Hookway added. Five mystic court fires "The fire gutted the en banc session hall, with the flames reaching the ceiling and perimeter wall. It started when we were having a meeting. The smoke came from one of the conference rooms. Thick smoke billowed out of the third floor of the main building, said Chief Justice Reynato Puno. On July 22, 2000, one year and two days after Judge Floro was suspended, the Catmon, Malabon City Halls of Justice was burned, destroying 5 million pesos worth of court properties. The one hour dawn fire reached 5th alarm and fully destroyed the Fiscal's and Clerk of Court's Offices, the court salas, offices of Judges, canteen and stockroom, except Judge Floro's. According to Mr. Hookway, enough bizarre events came to pass that in July, 2007 the Supreme Court issued an en banc resolution warning Judge Floro to stop in his threats of "ungodly reprisal." Judge Floro told Mr. Hookway that he is not suffering from psychosis, and that he's not to blame for the dire disasters. "He points the finger squarely at 'king of kings' elf Luis, who Mr. Floro says is bent on cleaning up what he says is the Philippines' corrupt legal system, and who had taken vengeance. During the court hearing, Mr. Floro revealed that Luis predicted that thenPhilippine President Joseph Estrada would be ousted from office; Mr. Estrada was forced from power by a popular revolt two years later in 2001 and was sentenced last week to life in prison for corruption," Mr. Hookway elaborated. The second fire also halved the Commission on Elections's seal on March 12, 2007, while the third fire almost obliterated the entire fourth floor of the Philippine Court of Appeals on July 26, 2007. The fourth mystic fire burned the Muntinlupa City halls and Metropolitan Trial Court on August 4, 2007.
- 45 -

Unexplained series of car accidents, illnesses, surgeries and deaths of Philippines jurists and lawyers Just five days after the Supreme Court of the Philippines released on March 31, 2006, the decision in these consolidated cases, unexplained series of car accidents, illnesses, surgeries and deaths had befallen upon Philippines jurists and lawyers. On April 12, 2006 and April 25, 2007, Luzvimanda D. Puno and Narcisa Puno, wife and mother, respectively of Chief Justice Reynato Puno passed away. On July 17, 2006 and November 16, 2008, Hilario Davide, Sr. and Edon Brion, the parents of Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr. and Supreme Court Associate Justice Arturo D. Brion, respectively, also died. Chief Justice Hilario Davide, Jr.'s brothers, the eldest, Jose Davide, a lawyer-engineer, and Jorge Davide, a doctor in soil, died in 2004 and 2002, respectively. Lirio B. Bautista, wife of former Judical and Bar Council Member, retired Sandiganbayan Justice Raoul Villaflor Victorino, passed away on August 5, 2006, at Medical City, 6 days before the Supreme Court released on August 11, the resolution dismissing the appeal of Judge Floro. "Alfredo Benipayo had chronic cough that bothered him for years. At first the best doctors thought the trouble was with his lungs. They found out later that it was his heart. He was suffering from CAD (coronary artery disease). His heart was clogged," wrote Fr. Rolando de La Rosa, O.P., UST in the Manila Bulletin. On February 21, 2001, Benipayo underwent angioplasty surgery 5 days after his appointment as Commission on Elections Chair. My doctor said, "We see a block in one of your arteries. To make sure that it's there, you better undergo an angiogram. It's true enough, not only one, but three of my arteries were severely blocked. Luckily, the operation was very successful. That was on a Friday, my fifth day in office. Sunday, I left the hospital, St. Luke's Medical Center," Benipayo told the Makati Business Club.
- 46 -

It was Justice Benipayo who signed the Memorandum of Suspension of Judge Floro on July 13, 1999. On February 22, 2008, 3 p.m., Alfredo Benipayo (Dean of the faculty of civil law at the University of Santo Tomas) was hospitalized in Iloilo City's Saint Paul's Hospital. At the middle of his lecture before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines Iloilo Chapter in a hotel, he collapsed. On the evening of January 26, 2007, Judge Floro's expert witness, parapsychologist Jaime Licauco almost died, having had a near-fatal heart attack (Myocardial infarction). he was rushed to the Makati Medical Center and finally transferred to the Philippine Chinese General Hospital. Licaucos cardiologist, Dr. Dy Bun Yok found (angiogram) that 70% of one of his arteries is blocked. Licauco stayed in the coronary care unit for 4 days, and thereafter, he underwent an angioplasty. After 2 days, Licauco left the hospital (after almost 2 weeks stay thereat). "My new cardiologist, Dr. Dy Bun Yok found one of my arteries was 70 percent blocked," Licauco wrote in the Philippine Daily Inquirer. On February, 2007, the judiciary mourned the twin deaths of retired S.C. Justice Vicente Ericta and C.A. Justice Roberto Barrios.[98]S.C. Justice Antonio Martinez died of kidney failure on March 17, 2007. On March 9, 2007, the neighbor of Judge Floro, Judge Rosa Reyes, Br. 74, RTC, Malabon died after 2 years battle with lung cancer. Associate Justice Bienvenido L. Reyes, who served as RTC Judge, in Br. 74, Malabon City, the neighbor of Judge Floro and precedessor of deceased Judge Rosa Reyes, suffered a heart attack (seizure) on August 8, 2009 and stayed in the intensive care unit of the Capitol Medical Center, Quezon City for "valvular heart disease, secondary to rheumatic heart disease; mitral regurgitation; and aortic valve stenosis (AS)." Reyes's physician, Dr. Francisco Lukban said.

- 47 -

Department of Justice Secretary Raul M. Gonzalez suffered from acute renal failure and in September 2007 he received a successful kidney transplant. Judge Floro's counsel of record in these cases, Rene Saguisag suffered a dire car accident on November 8, 2007, in Makati City. A speeding dump truck struck Saguisag's van, killing his wife Dulce Saguisag, a former Secretary of the Department of Social Welfare and Development. Saguisag was in critical condition and stayed for 20 days in the ICU of St. Luke's Hospital. He had seven broken ribs and small blood clots in his brain.[103] Makati City Mayor Jejomar Binay on April 21, 2008 asked the public to pray for Saguisag who was still recovering. "Hanggang ngayon e talagang hindi niya makalimutan yung nangyaring aksidente sa kanya (Until now, he cannot forget the accident)," Binay said. Guihulngan, Negros Oriental Regional Trial Court Judge Mario Trinidad, was the 16th Filipino judge murdered, since 1999, (when Judge Floro was suspended), the Monsters and Critics reported. The Manila Times and Counsels for the Defense of Liberties (CODAL), Philippines, a lawyers organization stated, in their special reports, that since 2001, 26 lawyers were killed due to their professions; 755 civilians had been killed extrajudicially, while 359 survived attacks, but 184 persons were still missing. Since the Supreme Court was created by law in 1901, no Supreme Court magistrate ever retired before the aged of compulsory retirement. But Justice Ma. Alicia Austria-Martinez, had to hand her robes due to health reasons. We were told she had health problems even when she was in the CA, a JBC member confirmed Austria-Martinez opted for early retirement on April 4, 2009 because of health reasons. "I am saddened that Justice Ma. Alicia Austria-Martinez has opted to retire early from the Supreme Court due to 'health reasons.' She is not bedridden. Neither is she physically or mentally incapacitated, but she has chosen to retire on April 30, 2009 because she felt she could no longer cope with the
- 48 -

heavy caseload," retired Chief Justice of the Philippines Artemio Panganiban wrote in his column in the Philippine Daily Inquirer. Former Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Francis E. Garchitorena, the predecessor of the ponente of these cases, Justice Minita Chico-Nazario, died of brain tumor on February 25, 2005, at the Makati Medical Center. To Filipinos, who are superstitious and believe in magical creatures - some invisible, some half-human, half- animal - which are all said to inhabit the Philippine countryside. Dwarves or duende are elf-like beings, something like tiny magical goblins who dwell in the forests. According to Philippine mythology and folklore, there are two types: the black ones, who are evil and can harm, and the red ones, who are good and can heal. In Mindoro, the Mangyan tribe claim to barter with the few remaining duende for forest products. Then there are the nocturnal Agta, tall black men who also hang out in the forests; the Batibat, found in Ilocos, look like fat women who live inside posts, and suffocate people by sitting on top of them; the bovine-like Mantahungal have fearsome teeth; the Pugot are self-beheading multi-formed creatures, and the Tikbalang are centaurs in reverse. [from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Florentino_Floro&oldid=291975074#Aftermath_and_unusual_circumsta nces].

VI.

Petitioner questions the legality, competence, integrity, probity and psychological fitness of JBC ex-officio member Chiz Escudero vis-vis his 2011 car accident trauma and 2012 annulment of marriage woes. In several JBC En Banc rulings in 2010-2011, Escudero voted against Petitioner, based on the ground of disqualification due to P 40,000.00 fine. Chiz, however, voted to exclude Petitioner in the July 6, 9-10, 2012 JBC Long List of Nominees because of alleged Psychosis finding of the 2006 Decision. His presence in the JBC is now challenged as farce by the Chavez vs. JBC SC case. Escudero vote and presence violated the Constitutional mandate of only 1 representative from Congress. He and his predecesors must reimburse the Treasury all moneys he and they received as JBC exofficio members.
- 49 -

JBC member Escudero voted to remove petitioner from the Long List of Nominees (22), on the ground of Psychosis-Dismissal finding of the 2006 Nazario Decision. Escuder forgot that he and the entire JBC previously ruled that Petitioner is disqualified in JBC nominations because of the P 40,000.00 gross ignorance of the law fine in the Fallo of the 2006 Decision (Vide: Annexes B and its sub-markings). After Escudero voted to oust Petitioner (who wrote the Court and the JBC that Chiz is not destined to be President of the Philippines), the good Senator suffered the dire Omen of car accident on June 13, 2011 which catapulted his family to the Family Court of woes. Petitioner consulted his 3 duendes on Senator Escuderos family troubles vis--vis his total car wreck, serious hand injuries and pains caused to other accident victims. Written in the stars is the fact that Escudero is not only incompetent to sit as JBC member, aside from lack of integrity,

probity, but as litigant in the annulment of marriage case which destroys his family, Escudero cannot escape the dictum of Karma: nagging puwing ako sa mata ni Chiz, nagging tinik sa lalamunan ni Escuder and 3 duende! Marital-psychological unfitness is too glaring to be disregarded by the Court. Under this mentally disabling disease, Escudero could be found by the marriage Court to be suffering from either a) impotence or b) psychological incapacity. Justice Pompeyo Diaz, Ateneo Law School professor lectured to Petitioner in persons-family class: When I was CFI Judge at Laguna, at the pre-trial, I stared at the penis of the husband; it is as big as a babys! (Canizares vs. Canizares case). Petitioner is not accusing Escudero of being impotent nor should he be under the continous guide of a psychiatrist, for anger management. If Escudero cannot tame his wife and educate properly his children, how can he vote in the JBC using the wisdom of King Solomon? Kaya nga sa galit niya sa asawa niya, Petitioner became a kitchen and sink tapunan. The result: petitioner is a dismissed Judge, due to Pyschosis, isang tabi na yang April 12, 2011 GRANT of Appeal. Escudero miserably
- 50 -

failed to learn the golden rule: Karma, Curse & Spell, 3 Stooges in his life until his final breath. Further, Chiz never learned, until today the significance of the July 11, 2012 Congress-Tupas fire which foretells in no uncertain terms: Hindi kana magiging Presidente! So, Chiz is planning to takbo-takbo as VP, so what! Like CJ nominee Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel
Siaynco, Escudero had been in virtual marriage prison for how many years? 1, 2, 3 ang tatay mong kalbo? Sana tigilan na niya itong 3 duende na wala namang kapangyarihan na ipagtanggol angmga sarili nila sa loob ng JBC En Banc deliberations. The PD Inquirer learned treatise is cited in support of the 2nd dire Omen in the soul and spirit of Escudero: Commentary - JBC is a farce By: MANUEL F. ALMARIO D Inquirer Friday, July 13th, 2012 The invitation by the Judicial and Bar Council for all nominees for chief justice to a job interview is demeaning to both the nominees and the Supreme Court itself. Justices of the Supreme Court are chosen; they do not apply for the job. In the United States, from which we borrowed many of our democratic concepts and practices, the President nominates the justice, and the nomination is confirmed by the Senate after a proper hearing by a bipartisan judiciary committee. When a vacancy occurs, the President conducts a search for a nominee, aided by his staff and advisors. The potential nominee is not even aware that he or she is being vetted until notification by the Office of the President. The nominees background is examined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which submits a report to the Senate judiciary record to determine suitability for office, then holds a hearing to question him or her about judicial record, political philosophy, ideology, and anything else deemed appropriate. The committee then makes a recommendation to the Senate, which approves or disapproves the nomination by majority vote. Under the Philippines 1935 Constitution, the procedure was for the President to make the nomination. It is then submitted to the Commission on Appointments (CA), which is composed of 24 members (12 each from the House of Representatives and the Senate). If the CA disapproves by majority vote, the President makes another selection. Thus, there was a real check and balance, as the CA is a body independent of the Office of the President. This provision of the 1935 Charter may be considered an improvement over the US
- 51 -

procedure, because it allowed both chambers of Congress to participate in the appointment of a justice. Under the 1972 Philippine Constitution, only the President had the power to appoint the justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the lower courts. No check and balance, in accord with the dictatorship imposed by Ferdinand Marcos. But under the 1987 Cory Constitution, a Judicial and Bar Council was established to make a list of at least three nominees from which the President selects the justice. The JBC has eight members, who serve for a term of four years. They are the Chief Justice, who presides as ex officio chair, the justice secretary, a representative of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), a professor of law, a retired member of the Supreme Court, a representative of the private sector, and one representative each of the House and the Senate. Except for the two Congress representatives, all are appointed by the President and are normally expected to follow what he/she dictates. Hence, the check and balance over appointments to the judiciary was abolished. It is a dictatorship in disguise. Moreover, legal practitioners from the IBP and the private sector (whatever that means) are included in the JBC as presidential appointees, injecting private and professional interest in the selection of justices and judges. Legal practitioners may expect to gain some advantage if appointed to the JBC because of influential connections to the anointed one. (That is why the IBP tended to favor then Chief Justice Renato Corona in the impeachment case.) The JBC is a farce, making possible the appointment of mediocre and self-serving justices, and habitually kowtowing to the appointing power. We should go back to the system established by the 1935 Constitution in which a real check and balance was maintained in appointments to the judiciary. The US system in appointing justices has worked effectively. The US Senate has rejected certain nominees not just for their lack of personal integrity but also for their positions on civil liberties, human rights, and social and political issues. One noteworthy case involved former Attorney General and Yale law professor Robert Bork, who was nominated to the Supreme Court in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan. His nomination was strongly opposed by civil rights and womens groups for his stated desire to roll back civil rights decisions by previous courts. The late Sen. Ted Kennedy took the Senate floor to oppose Borks nomination, declaring: Robert Borks America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the government, and the doors of the federal courts would
- 52 -

be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary isand often the onlyprotector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy As solicitor general under President Richard Nixon, Bork was responsible for the Saturday Night MassacreNixons firing of special prosecutor Archibald Cox and his deputies for requesting the submission of the White House tapes that implicated Nixon in the Watergate scandal. He was considered a loyal political operator of the disgraced President. (Corona was impeached by the Senate for, among other things, showing partiality to former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in her attempt to leave the country despite pending court cases.) On the other hand, President Barack Obamas nomination of Sonia Maria Sotomayor in 2009 as associate justice of the Supreme Courtits first Hispanic justice and its third female justice was approved by the US Senate by a 68-31 vote despite opposition from the Republicans. Public opinion was sharply divided over her nomination because of her Latino background, with US Rep. Newt Gingrich at one time calling her a racist. Sotomayor also refused to answer when asked what her stand would be if the decision in Roe vs. Wade, which legalized abortion in the United States, were brought before her. But her integrity and prudent decisions as a judge in the district and appellate courts won her the support of the Senate and much of the American public. One would not expect the eight members of the JBC, most of whom are presidential appointees, to publicly debate over their choices for the Supreme Court. They operate as a semisecret chamber. Since the JBC was established, there has been no public debate over the qualifications, opinions and judicial records of the nominees. In the past under the 1935 Constitution, when the President took full responsibility for the nomination of a justice, and Congress, through the CA, shared in the responsibility, the Philippines had great justices like Jose Abad Santos, Jose P. Laurel, Claro M. Recto and JBL Reyes, whose integrity and erudite decisions resonate through the years. We should return to the CA or the Senate the power to confirm or ratify presidential appointments to the Supreme Court and the lower courts. With elected peoples representatives, and not only a cabal of eight, participating in the selection, perhaps we will get a more effective, wiser and more righteous judiciary. [Manuel F. Almario is a lawyer and journalist. He is the spokesperson of the Movement for Truth in History. http://opinion.inquirer.net/32543/jbc-is-a-farce] Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J., who becomes less wise as he grows too old, like Agabin, submitted the following comedy of errors:

- 53 -

2 representatives, 1 vote for Congress in JBCFr. Bernas By Marlon Ramos Philippine Daily Inquirer Thursday, June 28th, 2012 What wrong could there be in allowing a senator and a congressman to participate in the search for the countrys next Chief Justice? Certainly none, at least in the opinion of one of the framers of the 1987 Constitution. Constitutionalist Fr. Joaquin Bernas Jr., one of the delegates to the Constitutional Commission which drafted the countrys charter, said the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) may continue to have eight members even if the Constitution states that it should only have seven. (The JBC members should be) seven, but in practice before, we put eight there, Bernas told reporters late Tuesday. But he noted that the senator and congressman in the JBC have half a vote each, or they alternated.
[http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/219539/2-representatives-1-vote-for-congress-injbc%E2%80%94fr-bernas]

It is sad, pathetic and mentally disturbing that Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S.J., and a Chaves vs JBC case are now sowing fear and anger in the corridors of power. The Constitutional issue could have been resolved thereat in the 1st year Law School classrooms, not in the Lyceum of Aurora Galman, not in the cursed Ateneo Law School rooms which were occupied by the Petitioners classmates-professors, but in Bulacan State University, whose former Dean Fiscal Liberato Reyes did suffer a massive stroke, after the Law School denied Petitioners application to teach law. Using a Statutory Construction book, the Court can handle the hot issue, thusly: Congress must vote and resolve in joint or separate session, who must sit as its representative in the JBC. Bernas is legally wrong, for there is no basis whatsoever (even from the 1986 Constitutional Assembly journals and ledgers, there at the OPAC, Ateneo Library) for suggesting that Escudero and Tupas can have vote each. These 2 lawmakers cannot alternate, unless the Family Court rules that Escudero is not suffering from mental disease, impotent and a bad father, and while Tupas is ruled by the Impeachment Court to have skeptically brush aside the July 11,

- 54 -

2012 Tongress fire that has a chilling effect upon the July 6, 9-10, 2012 Floro-JBC-exclusion ruling.
VII.

Petitioner asks the Court to preserve the integrity of the process of the alleged farce respondent JBC and to defend itself from a a) charming Liar, Dante Jimenez and a b) cognitive dementia patient, Lauro Visconde. Jimenez was adjudged guilty and punished by the Corona Spinea Court. Petitioner, on bended knees, was rejected and his 2000 written appeal was junked by both VACC powerful rulers who have no agenda but to eat anger, drink vengeance and accuse all insects and birds in the air.
Like the finally adjudged mentally sick RTC Malolos Judge

Manuel, the core duo Lauro Visconde and Jimenez faced-to-faced Petitioner months after the latter was suspended by the Court on July 20, 1999. While healing his classmate DOJ Chief of Staff Veni Fule in the presence of Vice Chief Pamela Lazatin, En Caguioa (Ateneo assistant registrar and wife of dismissed Judge Ramon Caguioa, classmate of petitioner) advised the Duende Judge to ask the help of Persida Acosta to secure an audience from the most powerful Lauro Visconde. Petioner discussed his case and submitted voluminous documents to the funny duet singers of VACC. In the interview at the 2nd floor of Pius XII Catholic Center VACC office, Petitioner observed the demeanor of Lauro. This is a sick man! said the 3 duendes. Lauro appeared too depressed, looking at the butiki and the gamugamos on the floor and ceiling. He never listened to Petitioners one hour submission of a more painful case. E, kahit maglulupasay siya, kahit magluto ng daga, at kahit magtanim ng kamote, kalabasa at tanglad, hindi na babalik pa ang mga Estrellita (49, had suffered thirteen stab wounds; Carmela, 19, had suffered seventeen stab wounds and had been raped before she was killed; and Jennifer, 6, had nineteen stab wounds). Dante Jimenez also displayed his charm, as a perfumed liar [Petitioner plagiarizes from the race horse Charming Liar running is SLLP stakes races]. VACC never entertained Petitioner since the Crusaders only deal with vengeance, hatred, getting-even and going to funerals of their co-victims of their own sin: hypocrisy.

- 55 -

The Court should not be helpless in smashing the VACC duos collateral attack (via JBC opposition) of the final contempt judgment. However, putting them to jail or punishing them again, would only create media blitz in their favor. The sole remedy of the Carpio court, is silence, but with utter vengeance in the name of Karma, Curse & Spell of the 3 duendes. Kahit naman maglulupasay sina Dante at Lauro, gaya ng ginawa ni Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison, hindi pa rin nila mapipigil ang pag-appoint sa bagong Chief Justice na uusig sa kanilang pagka-balatkayo! Dante Jimenez was cited in contempt and fined P30,000 in early 2011 for cursing the magistrates who voted to acquit Webb during an impromptu news conference soon after the verdict was announced. In separate affidavits, Jimenez and Vizconde said they went to visit Corona in his chambers in 2010 soon after he assumed the post of Chief Justice in order to congratulate him.
[http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/226748/vacc-no-to-carpio-as-chief-justice Anticrime group opposes Carpio as Chief Justice By Cathy Yamsuan Philippine Daily Inquirer Wednesday, July 11th, 2012].

VIII.

Petitioner predicts by way of dire Omen the fate of the respondent JBC: Raoul Victorinos IBP dictum has a chilling effect on sould and spirit of the JBC vis--vis the DOJ mysterious suicide of a jobless employee.
When JBC member Raoul Victorino occupied the hot seat of

Teresita Cruz-Sison, the mastermind of Petitoners 14 years suffering, and after the most painful death of his wife Lily (5 days before Justice Nazario junked Petitioners 1st Appeal, on July 11, 2006), the IBP listened to this proud mans care na care for integrity of the JBC process, even inventing a forum where he can sow fear, anger and anxiety, as he did before, when Petitioner filed several on bended knees applications junked by the respondent JBC. Now, Victorino sings: Raoul Victorino, retired Sandiganbayan justice and dean of the Philippine Christian University College of Law, said the next chief justice "must be unwavering in defending the independence of the judiciary. [http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/07/16/12/ibp-no-puppet-cj IBP: No to 'puppet CJ'By Jing Castaeda, ABS-CBN News Posted at 07/16/2012 6:36 PM | Updated as of 07/16/2012 6:36 PM] As if, things happen as directed by coincidence, JBC member Raoul Victorino must read forthwith this 2nd dire Omen for the respondent
- 56 -

JBC and himself: MANILA, PhilippinesThe utility worker who was found unconscious inside an office at the Department of Justice building in Manila on Monday afternoon passed away in the evening, it was learned. Flor Aviles, sister-in-law of the victim, Arlyn Aviles, said Arlyn was declared dead at 7:25 p.m. by doctors at the Philippine General Hospital, where she was taken after the victim was found lying face down around 2:30 p.m. inside Room 127, the office of State Prosecutor Caridad M. Junio. Police said Arlyn, of Poblacion, Muntinlupa City, drank a still undetermined poison. Found beside her was a suicide note addressed to an employee of the DoJ, whom she called kuya. The content of the note was not immediately available. The victims friends and colleague from DearJohn Services, a janitorial agency contracted by the DoJ, said Aviles suffered depression after the agency lost at the DoJ bidding and learned she would not be absorbed by the DoJ. [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/229793/doj-utility-worker-in-suicide-try-diesin-hospital DoJ utility worker in suicide try dies in hospital By Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net 12:48 am | Tuesday, July 17th, 2012] Unlike Marcelo Fernan, Victorino and Arlyn, who became too depressed after they lost the VP race, his wife and her job, Petitioner solely relies upon Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr.s November 12, 2003 Vindication by the Almighty, that is Divine Retribution against Cayosa & Capacite, inter alia, vis--vis his December 24, 1999 handwritten note and signature for Petitioner (Annex 1 hereof). Amen+

A MESSAGE TO THE NEXT CHIEF JUSTICE, TO ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ANTONIO T. CARPIO AND JBC CHAIR DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Lux in Domino * Ave Maria The Davide, Jr., Panganiban, Puno & Corona JBC-Courts of inJustice refused and failed and continued to fail and refuse to grant
- 57 -

Petitioner's Marian (Blue Madonna)-Eucharist-Black Nazarene Motions dated April 4, 2007 (and several multiple appeals, including the last, the 131-page Supplemental Omnibus Motion dated February 3, 2012 which inserted the Fallo of the Senate conviction of Renato C. Corona). Our Lady of Lourdes, of Fatima and of Akita is so desperate for She, as Ina ng Awa is so concerned of Her children who continue to suffer, sin and perish. Because of Her and Christs 47 Apparitions to Petitioner since September 13, 2008 (including 2 in 1999), the Black Nazarene and "Ang Himala" ("Soy la Imaculada Concepcion", Ave Maria) sent her 24 Archangels with billions of Angels (9 Choirs of Angels) to be photographed by the Petitioner: "The Philippines will not be spared!" - the dire 3 secrets of Fatima ... Petitioner had repeatedly implemented the Writ of Execution (mandate of Akita) vis-avis the Conditional Global Annihilation (Sendai, Sendong, Impeachment, Nimfa Cuesta- Vilches, JBC Conrado J Castro, Leo Dacera III, Rod Nazario, etc.). The Tupas-Congress fire of July 11, 2012 sends a strong message to the JBC Members and its Vice-Chair Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. (who is replaced by SC Associate Justice Diosdado M. Peralta). Petitioner, on bended knees, hereby ask the Court to allow him to be included in the televised Panel Interview, to fulfil and publish the Blue Madonna-MarianEucharist-Black Nazarene mandate, dire message and prophecy for the Filipino nation to hear and meditate upon. The following CODED messages posted in the Philippines first and foremost authority (forum) on photography is reproduced hereunder. Petitioner will thereafter deliver in writing this photo message to the Ateneo Law School Dean and the Ateneo de Manila University President, including its Psychology Department (Chair Lota Teh), inter alia, for expert examination [against a) atheists, b) born again Christians who desecrate Holy Images or Icons of Mary and the Black Nazarene, inter alia and c) Catholic priests, bishops and cardinals who were foretold (in the Fatima apparitions) to have continued and to continue to sin and plunge into darkness. ***** freethought-forum.com

- 58 -

Congratulations! This is the culmination of your years of unremitting loyalty to LUIS. The Archangels are more adorable than I ever could have imagined. livius drusus
http://www.freethought-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=26706

armchairgeneral.com Finally...documentary evidence The nay-sayers have been refuted... with prejudice. Skoblin
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124343 http://i35.tinypic.com/28vzymx.gif My transformer snail senses danger!

The Court, the JBC and the Filipino nation will witness a sign, a miracle and a dire Omen after this Court and respondent JBC would have received the Original and copies of this Blue Madonna-Marian-EucharistBlack Nazarene pleading (entitled VERY URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI vis-a-vis the Tupas-Congress fire). Are the UFO and Angel photos unexplained? Started by FlorentinoFloro, 07-11-2012 05:51 PM Replies: 3 Views: 191 07-11-2012, 05:51 PM #1 FlorentinoFloro DPP Member Join Date Aug 2011 Location Bulacan, Philippines Posts 4 I started taking photos of UFOs and Angel like lights between 11 p.m. to 1 a.m. since May 4, 2012. I desire to publish these pictures here for comment on what they really are on the mind of professional photography. Please help me know the photo truth for I am scientific amid my religious beliefs. Here: http://ufojf.blogspot.com/ example: DSC04796.jpg eljunPacomios DPP Member Join Date Mar 2011 Posts 563 Post July 12, 2012 Hi Sir. I am no professional. Your photos gave me goosebumps. I want to hear from the others. Up for you sir. Karlo Ibarra DPP Member Join Date Aug 2011 Posts 319 Post Photography-wise, the images are not good. The subjects are out of focus and the low resolution and small image size did not help. It's hard to know exactly what we're looking at. They could be lens flares or dust reflecting light. and they may not stand well as scientific evidence. And besides, with the state of today's image manipulation technology, it is not entirely impossible to reproduce something like these.
- 59 -

Nelson Yu DPP Member Join Date Jun 2012 Location Manila Posts 236 Post July 12, 2012 , 02:15 PM At this day in age, almost anything that was first thought to be impossible was already made possible. Space is astronomically gargantuan, our own Sun alone is not even a speck size compared to Antares. With all the heavenly bodies that is out in space, with the forces immeasurable from the beginningless time, what is space if it is just a barren lifeless void? With your pictures I agree with Karlo, could this be a proof that Aliens exist, No. Unless they would land somewhere and buy Nikon or Canon from Mang Ramon of Mayer, I think he is alien too, can't say that your pictures can hold weight in gold. If they are here on Earth for a visit or stay, I wouldn't wonder, just hope they wouldn't mutate us to have two heads in a body. One brain is already too much to deal with in our current society and most don't use them to full potential and fill it with porn.
[http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/showthread.php?47619-Are-theUFO-and-Angel-photos-unexplained]

N.B.: July 7, 2012 Astronomers announce the discovery of S/2012 P 1, the fifth moon of Pluto. An Image of P5, the newly discovered fifth moon of Pluto by the Hubble Space Telescope. S/2012 (134340) 1 (also informally known as S/2012 P 1 or P5) is a small natural satellite of Pluto whose existence was announced on 11 July 2012. It is the fifth confirmed satellite of Pluto, and was found approximately one year after S/2011 P 1, Pluto's fourth discovered satellite . [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/Pluto_P5_Discovery_Image.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S/2012_P_1]

CONCLUSION The Judicial and Bar Council clearly erred, has acted without or in excess of its or his jurisdiction, with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, since Petitioners exclusion from the final List of Chief Justice candidates scheduled for JBC Panel Interview (on July 44-27, 2012) is null and void

- 60 -

under the law and Constitution. Ergo, Petitioner is praying that judgment be rendered annulling the exclusion ruling and proceedings of such Council, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require. The petition is accompanied by a) the attached Original of the published JBC judgment, order or resolution subject thereof (which clearly shows that the name of Peitioner is not included, corroborated by print and broadcast media announcements of JBC ex-officio Members Cong. Neil S. Tupas, Senator Chiz Escudero and Atty. Jose Mejia (which official statements can be taken judicial notice of by the Court), b) copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a c) sworn certification of non-forum shopping. This Petition is an ideal vehicle to use for dispelling lingering confusion over the scope of an important constitutional protection. The Petition should be granted.

Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., Petitioner, Cel. # 0915-5330008, c/o Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN, Tel. # (044) 840-8176

Relief
PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully prayed to this Honorable Court, that the instant

VERY URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI --- be given DUE COURSE, duly NOTED and GRANTED.
FURTHER, it is respectfully and specifically prayed that Petitioner be included in the Long List of JBC Panel Interview Chief Justice Candidates (set on January 24-27, 2012, from which List, the Short List
- 61 -

would originate from, based on the July 30, 2012 final Voting of the JBC En Banc), in view of the extraordinary circumstances above-submitted. FURTHERMORE, it is respectfully prayed that the instant Petition be included in a Special Raffle (that Petitioner requests the Clerk of Court En Banc to conduct), since time is of the essence.

The Clerk of Court should furnish copies of all pleadings, Judgments, Resolutions and papers, etc. to:
Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., Petitioner, Cel. # 0915-8308816, c/o Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN.

Other reliefs and remedies, just and equitable under the circumstances are likewise prayed for, including but not limited to the following: 1) To require JBC Member Maria Milagros N. FernanCayosa & Executive Officer, Annaliza S. Ty-Capacite, to explain, why they included in the JBC Long List of 22 Chief Justice Candidates, a SC adjudged (by final annulment 2004 SC Judgment), retired Malolos City RTC Judge Manuel Siaynco (shackled-sick man-psychotic and a sex pervert-philanderer who endured and suffered through his turbulent and loveless marriage to his wife for twenty-two (22) years, in G.R. NO. 158896 October 27, 2004 JUANITA CARATING-SIAYNGCO, petitioner, vs. MANUEL SIAYNGCO, respondent. CHICO-NAZARIO, J.); 2) To direct the respondent JBC to strike-out forthwith Judge Manuel Siayncos name from the July 24-27, 2012 JBC Long List of 22 Chief Justice Candidates; 3) To stop JBC ex-officio member Francis Chiz Escudero from attending and participating the JBC En Banc meetings and deliberations (until the Court decides with finality the Chavez vs. JBC

- 62 -

case), and to annul his vote to exclude Petitioner from the JBC Long List of Chief Justice Candidates. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I signed this Petition, this Friday the 13th, 2012, at Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan, Philippines for Manila, Metro Manila. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., Petitioner, Cel. # 0915-8308816, c/o Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN,
[I.D. Number: RTCJ-317 / EDP Number: 38676300; ROLL OF ATTORNEYS NO. 32800, Pg. No. 60, Book No. XIV].

Urgent NOTICE (Request for Special Raffle-Agendum)

TO: Atty. Enriqueta Esguera Vidal, Clerk of Court, En Banc, (Tel. No. 5236558, 524-9560), Supreme Court, En Banc, Manila: Please AGENDUM forthwith this pleading-Petition and submit it immediately to the Supreme Court, En Banc, upon receipt hereof, for its assignment to a Ponente, its deliberation and resolution, since time is of the essence, and considering the urgency, importance and landmark nature of the matter. FURTHERMORE, it is respectfully prayed that the instant Petition be included in a Special Raffle (that Petitioner requests the Clerk of Court En Banc to conduct), since time is of the essence. JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., Petitioner VERIFICATION & CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM SHOPPING
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S. I, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., petitioner, under oath, depose/say, that: I am the petitioner in this case. I caused the preparation, signed and read the instant pleading, and all the contents/allegations thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records. I CERTIFY (a) that I have not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein; the A.M. No. RTJ99-1460, Office of the Court Administrator v. Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr), is totally different from this and is no longer pending, in so far as the finality is concerned (except the matter of collection of backwages to execute the Resolution, inter alia) since the SC En Banc Resolution of April 12, 2012 has not been appealed and is final and executory; (b) if there is such other pending action or claim, I will file a complete statement of the present status thereof, but there is none; and (c) if I should thereafter learn that the same or similar

- 63 -

action or claim has been filed or is pending, I shall report that fact within five (5) days therefrom to the court wherein his aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this Friday the 13th, July, 2012, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 20011. BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public, Until Jan.31, 2012, PTR NO. 7960111, 12- 2811, Atty.s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 852362, 1-2,12 MCLE COMP. III-0019636, 12- 21-10 2nd Floor, BPSTA Bldg., Provincial Compound, Malolos City, Bulacan, (044) 6625335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary DOC. NO. 81, PAGE NO. 18, BOOK NO. 96, SERIES OF 2012.

COPY FURNISHED-SERVED:
By Personal Service: ***The Judicial and Bar Council, the Chairman, the Members, and Ex-Offico Secretary, through the Secretariat, 2nd Floor, Centennial Bldg., Supreme Court, Padre Faura, Manila Philippines 1000 (Email: jbc@sc.judiciary.gov.ph jbc87supremecourt@gmail.com Phone No.: (02) 552-9512 / 552-9608 Fax No.: (02) 552-9607). By Registered Mail with Return Card: Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copies of this pleading was made by registered mail with return card upon herein parties: ***Office of the Solicitor General Francis Jardaleza, 134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, Makati City Tel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037 Email: docket@osg.gov.ph Original of the Registry Receipt is attached above, in the Original of the Petition, while the xerox of the Registry Receipts is attached with the copies of the Petition. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) City of Malolos, Bulacan ) S.S. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
I, Judge Florentino Floro, Petitioner, with residence, and mailing address at c/o Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan City, 3020 Bulacan, after being duly sworn, depose and say: That on July 18, 2012, I served copies of the petition with annexes of the following pleading/paper by personal service in accordance with Rule 13, inter alia, of the Revised Rules of Court, by delivering personally a copy to the party or JBC secretariat, by leaving it in its office with his clerk or with a person having charge thereof, as evidenced by the rubber stamp mark of the office herewith. Nature of Pleading/Paper Certiorari Case, G.R. No. ___________, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. vs. JBC. The addressees are as follows: By Personal Service: The Judicial and Bar Council, the Chairman, the Members, and Ex-Offico Secretary, through the Secretariat, 2nd Floor, Centennial Bldg., Supreme Court, Padre Faura, Manila Philippines

- 64 -

1000 (Email: jbc@sc.judiciary.gov.ph jbc87supremecourt@gmail.com Phone No.: (02) 5529512 / 552-9608 Fax No.: (02) 552-9607). Chair Justice DIOSDADO M. PERALTA Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA Hon. FRANCIS JOSEPH G. ESCUDERO Hon. NIEL C. TUPAS JR. Hon. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Hon. ENRIQUETA ESGUERRA VIDAL Hon. REGINO C. HERMOSISIMA JR.

Hon. JOSE V. MEJIA

Hon. AURORA SANTIAGO LAGMAN

Hon. MARIA MILAGROS N. FERNAN-CAYOSA c/o The JBC Secretariat: Atty. ANNALIZA S. TY-CAPACITE, BC Executive Officer That on July 18, 2012, I served copy of the petition with annexes of the following pleading/paper by depositing the copy of the petition with annexes in the Pulilan, Bulacan post office, in sealed envelope, plainly addressed to the party or its counsels at its office, with postage fully pre-paid, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after ten (l0) days if undelivered, as evidenced by the registry receipts attached herewith. Certiorari Case, G.R. No. ___________, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. vs. JBC. By Registered Mail with Return Card: Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copy of this pleading with annexes was made by registered mail with return card upon herein: Office of the Solicitor General Francis Jardaleza, 134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, 1229 Makati City Tel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037 Email: docket@osg.gov.ph

Original of the Registry Receipt is attached above, in the Original of the Petition, while the xerox of the Registry Receipts is attached with the copies of the Petition.

Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 18th, July, 2012, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2011. BERNAR D. FAJARDO
Notary Public, Until Jan.31, 2012, PTR NO. 7960111, 12- 2811,

- 65 -

Atty.s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 852362, 1-2,12 MCLE COMP. III-0019636, 12- 21-10 2nd Floor, BPSTA Bldg., Provincial Compound, Malolos City, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary

DOC. NO. 82, PAGE NO. 18, BOOK NO. 96, SERIES OF 2012. *****

Download this document: Download: 68-page - VERY URGENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF

CERTIORARI

***** References Download this document: Download: 97 pages - Florentino Floro, Black Nazarene, Virgin Mary, June 12, 2012

http://www.scribd.com/doc/96791797 http://en.calameo.com/books/001207381f1c679af6621
*****

http://www.flickr.com/photos/79584531@N04/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/79262015@N07/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/79442122@N06/ ***** http://ufojf.blogspot.com/

24 Jupiter-Venus-Mars Aliens-Archangels & UFOs: LUIS, Armand & Angel

http://nazarenejfloro.blogspot.com/ http://jfvfhealers.blogspot.com/

- 66 -