Tell me about yourself. "I was born in Canton, Ohio and attended Lincoln High School.

Ever since I was a teenager, I tinkered with computers. It was my hobby, my passion, and my way of learning. Like most kids I enjoyed computer games. When my folks gave me a computer as a reward for making honor roll my sophomore year, I mastered DOS, Windows, and WordPerfect within six months. I then went on to teach myself programming basics. By the time I graduated high school, I knew I wanted to study programming. From that point on, everything fell into place. My life revolved around computing. By my junior year at Syracuse, I decided I wanted to work for a major software manufacturer. That is why I had an internship last summer at FastTrack Software. I now want to work for a major player so I can be at the forefront of breaking trends and new technology. When my college roommate told me about his start in your department, I hounded him until he helped me get a referral, which brought me here today. I am prepared to answer any questions you may have about my education and experience." Where do you see yourself five years from now? "In five years I hope to be working with an employer in an increasingly responsible position, that enables me to utilize my talents and work closely with my colleagues in solving important problems. I see myself taking on new and exciting challenges in an enjoyable environment and hopefully this will be with your company." What type of decisions do you have difficulty making? "I sometimes have difficulty choosing between two equally good ideas." or "I used to have difficulty saying 'no' to people until I learned to better set priorities."

internet should be censored! Or Government's action on social networking sites is justified BackGround

Internet censorship is the control or suppression of the publishing of, or access to information on the Internet. It may be carried out by governments or by private organizations either at the behest of government or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship on their own or due to intimidation and fear.

Internet censorship in India is selectively practiced by both federal and state governments. While there is no sustained government policy or strategy to block access to Internet content on a large scale, measures for removing content that is obscene or otherwise objectionable, or that endangers public order or national security have become more common in recent years.

Favor

The words and images users post on the Internet may be available for years, and your profile may be viewed by future employers and school admissions officials, as well as identity thieves, spammers, and stalkers.This information can be used for the different purpose without any acknowledgement to user. Many individuals and groups are using the social networking sites to provoke the users against the government.Its all politically motivated.They are using the tactics which are not acceptable in real world. Apart from political motives many terrorist and racist organizations are using the social media for hurting the emotions of people and spewing hate against the castes, religions and races. Internet is in a completely in chaos due to less censorship.There is need to censor the content and usage or the internet.People are abusing each other anonymously there is no one out on internet who can take care on these Problems.We need internet police. Internet censorship is not at all about the hindering the freedom it is about the mapping the virtual world with the real world ethics. Against

Internet is a open and free medium.It can be accessed by anyone by any where.That is the power of internet.If government start censoring voices of the people then internet will loose its charm. I agree that on internet and on social media websites lot of content available which could be against few groups or government.But content available is a view of another group.We can not stop people of keeping a different perception.We cant hinder the freedom. The content available on different forums or social networking sites are always publish with a report feature.If a person or group find it offensive they can report it.And the site

could take action on the content.Need is to make generic standards for all sites to filter the content based on the hate.This mechanism is already there so what is need to censor further. Why government need to control the content.Political parties can be use the content for their personal profit. Parties would censor only content what is against them not against the opposition. So if required to regulate there must be a third party censorship firm or agency or regulatory body.Which can take action without partiality. Conclusion

There is no need to censor the internet.What is required is to setup the a mechanism or regulatory body which can take care of websites to manage their content. Internet is free medium and no one should have right to censor things on it.

In an over-regulated society corruption is inevitable.(MICA)

Favour

Forcing human mind to follow the rules which are unnecessary and biased make them revolutionary and they move towards revange and corruption is one of the way to take that revange form governement. Few people believe laws are made to be broken so this is case of the economic phenomenon of regulatory arbitrage

Against

corruption is a personal equation and holds good or bad depending on an individual's and organization's personal value systems.Regulations , like democracy is a systemic phenomenon ;Both have nothing to do with each other. Conclusion

Over regulating simple things of daily life can create problem in daily life but regulations are must to run the complex morden life .

For the poorer sections of society, a state controlled economy is better than a liberalized economy

Favour

China is biggest example of success of state controlled economy. In libral ecnomies richer become more richer and poors are getting more poor. A controlled economy will result in proper flow of benefits towards the rural masses. The state has control over the production and the markets helping the poorer sections to avail benefits which they otherwise would have been deprived of.

Against

The state controlled economies are big problem in the path of growing business in country which will surely affect the country's growth which eventually affects poors. Russia is biggest example of failure of state controlled economy The communist countries are a bright example that state controlled economies do not result in uplifting the poor. As history stands a proof state controlled economies have higher rates of corruption and mismanaged economies. A liberalized economy with sound regulatory framework will ensure employment and a healthy economy.

Conclusion

State controlled ecnomy is having few benefits but from evidances from history the conclusion is that state controlled economy is big failure.

India should be reorganized into smaller states.

Favour

By dividing the problem in small parts and cooncentrating on the problems regionvise there are more chances of better growth We need governance at small level so that we can manage and regulate the life more appropriately By recognizing the india into smaller states on the basis of problems(illittracy,poority)can give the chance to goverment to resolve those problems on those portions of india

Against

Dividing india into not the solution of the problem.Because it creates hatered and bifurcation between people of 2 states. More over dividing on the basis of caste and religion is creating more issues like minor ,major population with in newly created state Even if we divide on the basis of problem We can resolve that perticular problem but that state again left in total growth. The resources of the india become property of that state so other states become insecure and only people of that perticular reason become more rich. Conclusion

Recognizing the india into smaller states is not a good idea

We can recognize few more states on the basis of problem in that area so that those problem could be resolved but proper laws should be there Dividing the india into smaller states on the basis of caste and religion is not worthy.

Life may start getting happier after 50 Favor

Number of studies says at age of 50 happiness begins to peak while stress,anger and worry all start to fade. With age comes experience and wisdom tools that increase one's ability to accept the world the way it is rather than whine over its imperfactions. We have to diffrentiate happiness and enjoyment.Perhaps spirit of youth allows one to indulge in enjoyment.But it is when someone is 50 he experiences true happiness born out of the contentment. indeed while approaching the end humans realise that life is too short for worrying about the things we are not taking to our graves. Besides scintific advances provide us opprotunity to lead a healthy life even in age of 50.

Against

Contentment satisfaction happiness they are matter of perspective and perspective not tied to any particular age. There may be few people who gain correct perspective to view life as beautiful at the age of 50 but there are more people who find life more exciting in younger age.when personal health is at its peakand future posibilities are open. Happiness is state of mind and individual doent need to be of a certain age to acquire that state of mind. Conclusion

There is no denying it. At 50+ years old, we are not as young as we used to be. That does not mean that we have to stop living life well. Fifty is a great time to turn your attention to your total wellbeing. For many people turning 50 can be an even higher hurdle than when they turned 30. They begin to think of themselves as old and dull. It does not have to be so. This can be the best time of your life. You can have a life full of health, vitality, and happiness after 50 and beyond.

Youth in India are becoming greedy by the day

Favour

Surely the young genration is becoming greedy every one running behind easy money and dont want to put the efforts to earn it by hard work. The youth is getting so much opportunities ,still they want to go to ONsite and earn money from there they dont want to contribute in nations growth but want more benfits from government. Youth dont want to stay in india they want to sattle abroad.

Against

Ambition is being misunderstood for greediness. The way youth behaved in last decade in india the way they have worked and shown there qualities made the india one of the biggest contender for next super power. Conclusion

The youth some how running behind money but there ambitions and dreams are acelrated by there own hard work so they derve it. freshers are better then laterels

Favour (Yes)

Frehers have more enthusiasm and energy and motivation Freshers comeup with new inovative ideas to the organization Freshers not have pre assumptions so they come up and fight the challenges and try to change the things.Whereas the experience people are filled with the preassumpions so they want to tackle things in routine way

Against (No)

Fresher also be needed to get trained from the laterels as experice is also need in the business matters where it to critical for the freshers to take the decision Laterals have the experience to deal with the situations which could affect the buisness Laterals had been freshers at some point of time so they have the equal energy and and ideas at past. Laterals are very important for consistant and smooth running business beacause reinventing the wheel approach has to be used if only freshers will work. Conclusion

Freshers are very important for junior level where as the laterals needs for the higher level of the project.There should be proper mixed of freshers and laterals for every project.